ArticlePDF Available

The Maxwell-Faraday Equation Extended for Convection

Authors:

Abstract

To show that the curl of E = v×B is an additional convective component to the Maxwell-Faraday equation.
1
The Maxwell-Faraday Equation Extended for Convection
Frederick David Tombe,
Belfast, Northern Ireland,
United Kingdom,
sirius184@hotmail.com
17th July 2023
Abstract. To show that the curl of E = v×B is an additional convective component to the
Maxwell-Faraday equation.
The Electromagnetic Forces
I. When a charged particle is placed in a magnetic field, it experiences a force
under two conditions. If the magnetic field is varying in time, the particle
experiences a force,
E = −∂A/∂t (1)
where E is the force per unit charge, and where,
B = ×A (2)
When the charged particle is moving with velocity, v, it experiences a
deflecting force in the form,
E = v×B (3)
We will now take the curl of the total electromagnetic force, as in,
×E = ×[−∂A/∂t + v×B] (4)
From equation (2), this leads to the Maxwell-Faraday equation, but with an
additional convective term, ×(v×B), on the right-hand-side, as in,
×E = −∂B/∂t + ×(v×B) (5)
If we can show that,
×(v×B) = (v·)B (6)
then we will have shown that ×(v×B) is the convective component of the
total time derivative,
2
d/dt = ∂/∂t + (v·) (7)
where the partial time derivative, ∂/∂t, is known as the local time derivative,
and where (v·) is known as the convective derivative. Hence,
×E = −dB/dt (8)
Unlike in the 1982 derivation, [1], this will now be demonstrated by
multiplying out the components in full.
The Analysis
II. The analysis begins by multiplying out the components of v×B. These are,
(vyBz vzBy)i (9)
(vzBx vxBz)j (10)
(vxBy vyBx)k (11)
We then take the curl of equations (9), (10), and (11), and at this stage it is
important to bear in mind that v is the velocity of a charged particle and that it is
not therefore a vector field. Hence, the spatial derivatives of v will all be zero.
The result is,
[vxBy/∂y + vxBz/∂z]i (12)
[vy∂Bz/∂z + vy∂Bx/∂x]j (13)
[vz∂Bx/∂x + vz∂By/∂y]k (14)
Now we need to take account of the fact that magnetic fields are
solenoidal, and that from equation (2), we know that,
·B = 0 (15)
and hence,
∂Bx/∂x + ∂By/∂y + ∂Bz/∂z = 0 (16)
3
As pointed out by Professor Halim Boutayeb, Professor at Université du
Québec en Outaouais, in a private correspondence on ResearchGate, we can
isolate any of the three terms on the left-hand-side of equation (16) and equate it
with the negative of the sum of the other two terms. As such, substituting
equation (16) into (12), (13), and (14), we obtain,
[vx∂Bx/∂x]i (17)
[vy∂By/∂y]j (18)
[vz∂Bz/∂z]k (19)
These are the equivalent of (v·)B which is what we set out to
demonstrate. ×(v×B) is therefore the additional convective component
required to make the Maxwell-Faraday equation into a total time derivative
equation as per equation (8).
The Galilean Transformation
III. The convective term, v×B, in electromagnetic induction is not the
consequence of a Galilean transformation. The Galilean transformation ignores
the existence of the physical medium through which motion is defined and
which is responsible for generating both the inertial forces and the
electromagnetic forces. This medium is a dense sea of rotating electron-positron
dipoles that fills all of space, [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].
Conclusion
IV. The term, v×B, which first appeared in the electromotive force equation
(equation (77)) in Maxwell’s 1861 paper, “On Physical Lines of Force”, [7], is
the convective term which would complete the Maxwell-Faraday equation, that
being the curl of equation (77). This is the deflecting force which acts on a
moving charged particle in an already existing background magnetic field, and
which is due to the asymmetrical contact with the field. The magnetic field is
constructed from tiny rotating electron-positron dipoles, mutually aligned along
their rotation axes, and so the component of the particles motion at right-angles
to the field lines, will generate a differential centrifugal pressure on either side
of the particle, at right-angles to that component of its motion. This will cause
the particle to deflect away from its straight-line path. Meanwhile, the moving
particle itself also generates its own superimposed magnetic field which causes
an additional v×B force to press inwards evenly all around it, at right-angles to
its direction of motion. This latter force is also accompanied by an asymptotic
4
factor which predicts a terminal speed and hence betrays the inertial resistance
that arises due to the presence of the all-pervading electron-positron sea. In
order to derive v×B in this latter context, we need to use a Lorentz
transformation and we need to also involve the electrostatic force, ψ, since it
is involved in the construction of the magnetic field lines, [8].
Finally, it’s important to note that the Lorentz transformation is not actually
a coordinate frame transformation at all, but rather it is an analysis which
describes the manner in which a rotating dipole precesses and tends towards a
terminal speed as it is linearly accelerated through the electron-positron sea, [8].
References
[1] Tombe, F.D., “Maxwell’s Equations and Galilean Relativity”, (1984)
https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Journal%20Reprints-
Mechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/3757
[2] Tombe, F.D., “The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field”, (2006)
Galilean Electrodynamics, vol. 24, number 2, p.34, (March/April 2013)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295010637_The_Double_Helix_Theory_of_the_M
agnetic_Field
[3] Tombe, F.D., “Atomic Clocks and Relativity”, (2023)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372165749_Atomic_Clocks_and_Relativity
[4] Tombe, F.D., The Positronium Orbit in the Electron-Positron Sea, (2020)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338816847_The_Positronium_Orbit_in_the_Electr
on-Positron_Sea
[5] Tombe, F.D., “The Double Helix and the Electron-Positron Aether”, (2017)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319914395_The_Double_Helix_and_the_Electron-
Positron_Aether
[6] Tombe, F.D., “The Electron-Positron Sea”, (2014)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320173646_The_Electron-
Positron_Sea_The_Electric_Sea
[7] Clerk-Maxwell, J., “On Physical Lines of Force”, Philosophical Magazine, Volume
XXI, Fourth Series, London, (1861)
http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf
[8] Tombe, F.D., “The Lorentz Aether Theory”, (2020)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339696770_The_Lorentz_Aether_Theory
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
There are two physical effects which cause atomic clocks to run slower. These are motion and gravity, and the rate of retardation can be quantified using equations that are closely related to the equations of relativity. This article will examine why this should be, and what the common physical mechanism is between motion and escape velocity that results in these two factors having an identical physical effect on the clock mechanism.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose is to show that the equation E = mc^2 was already implicit in Maxwell's 1861 paper "On Physical Lines of Force" and that it doesn't mean that mass is equivalent to energy, but rather it relates to the propagation of electromagnetic radiation through a sea of rotating electron-positron dipoles which pervades all of space.
Article
Full-text available
It is proposed that all space is permeated with a dense electrically neutral sea of electrons and positrons which serves as the medium for the propagation of light. The challenge remains to devise a stable bonding mechanism within this luminiferous medium that conforms with Maxwell's equations by providing the necessary solidity and the physical mechanism that will give rise to the characteristics of electromagnetic waves, while at the same time allowing for the fluidity that would avoid the problem of friction in the planetary orbits.
Article
Full-text available
The historical linkage between optics and electromagnetism can be traced back to the year 1855, when Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch, by discharging a Leyden Jar (a capacitor), demonstrated that the ratio of the electrostatic and electrodynamic units of charge is equal to c√2, where c is the directly measured speed of light. Although not initially aware of the connection to the speed of light, Weber interpreted c√2 as a kind of mutual escape velocity for two elements of electricity in relative motion, such as would enable the induced magnetic force to overcome the mutual electrostatic force. A few years later, James Clerk Maxwell converted this ratio from electrodynamic units to electromagnetic units, hence exposing the speed of light directly. On connecting Weber’s ratio to the dielectric constant in an all-pervading elastic solid, Maxwell concluded that light consists in the transverse undulations of the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena. The differing perspectives of Weber and Maxwell can be reconciled by linking the speed of light to the circumferential speed of the electric particles surrounding the tiny molecular vortices that Maxwell believed to be the constituent units of the luminiferous medium. If we consider these molecular vortices to be tiny electric current circulations, mutually aligned along their rotation axes to form magnetic lines of force, magnetic repulsion can then be explained in terms of centrifugal pressure acting sideways from these field lines. And if these molecular vortices should take the more precise dipolar form of an electron and a positron in mutual orbit, we can then further explain magnetic attraction, this time in terms of the more fundamental electrostatic force being channeled along the double helix of electrons and positrons that forms a magnetic line of force.
Maxwell's Equations and Galilean Relativity
  • F D Tombe
Tombe, F.D., "Maxwell's Equations and Galilean Relativity", (1984) https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Journal%20Reprints-Mechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/3757