ArticlePDF Available

Scientometric Analysis of Top 100 High Cited Papers on COVID-19 Research in Nepal : A Study

Authors:
  • National Institute of Science Technology & Development Studies (NISTADS) CSIR New Delhi
  • Government First Grade College, Hospet

Abstract

Objectives: High-cited papers are considered publications with a great impact on a scientific community and have been investigated in different fields and countries. This study aimed at analyzing the top 100 high-cited papers (with 31 or more citations) on Covid-19 research in Nepal. It aimed to evaluate the characteristics and trends in Covid-19 research in Nepal using bibliometric and visualizations methods.
43
Scientometric Analysis of Top 100 High Cited Papers on COVID-19 Research in
Nepal : A Study
B.M. Gupta1
Mallikarjun M Kappi2
Jivesh Bansal3
Rajpal Walke4
Ghouse Modin Mamdapur5
Abstract
Objectives: High-cited papers are considered publications with a great impact on a scientific community
and have been investigated in different fields and countries. This study aimed at analyzing the top
100 high-cited papers (with 31 or more citations) on Covid-19 research in Nepal. It aimed to evaluate
the characteristics and trends in Covid-19 research in Nepal using bibliometric and visualizations
methods.
Methods: The data for the study was sourced from Scopus database since the origin of virus till
16.5.2023, using a search strategy. The search yielded 1157 papers, which were rearranged by
frequency of citations to obtain top 100 high cited papers
Results:Of the 1157 papers indexed in Scopus database on Covid-19 in Nepal till 16.5.2023, the top
100 (9.46%) high-cited papers registered 31 to 1507 citations, averaging 118.55 CPP. An external
funding was received by only 29.0% publications, which were cited 2931 times (with an average of
135.55 CPP). Similarly, 85% of the top 100 Nepal HCPs were involved in international collaboration,
which were cited 11003 times, with an average of 129.45. Among the foreign countries participation
in 85 ICPs of Nepal, the lead countries were India (n=50), USA (n=35), U.K. (n=31) and Saudi
Arabia (n=28)., Colombia and Australia (n=26 each), China (n=22), Japan and Pakistan (n=13
each), etc, The top three most productive participating organizations in Nepal Covid-19 research
were Tribhuvan University (n=36), Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (n=20) and Patan
Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur (n=5) and the top 3 most impactful organizations were Nepal
Medicity Hospital (279.5 and 2.36), Kathmandu Medical College & Teaching Hospital (229.5 and
1.94) and Lod Buddha Education Foundation (171,.33 and 1.45). The top three most productive
authors were R. Sah (n=22), P. Sharma (n=5) and B. Rayamajhee (n=3) and the top three most
impactful authors were D. Aryal (335.0 and 2.83), J.M. Chatterjee (171.33 and 1.45) and R. Sah
(171.09 and 1.44). The top three mostproductive journals were Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
(n=8),Frontiers In Public Health (n=4) and Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
(n=3). Epidemiology and clinical studies accounted maximally (25.0% and 19.0%) and “Coronavirus
Disease 2019” (n=69), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” (n=48) “Virus Pneumonia”(n=31),
“Virology”(n=17) and “Disease Transmission” (n=14) were the most significant keyword appearing
in the literature.
1 Formerly with CSIR-NISTADS, New Delhi 110012, India. E-Mail. bmgupta@gmail.com. 2Government First
Grade College, Jagalur – 577528, Karnataka,3Panjab University, Central Library, Chandigarh. 4CSIR-NPL Library,
New Delhi -110012, India, 5Synthite Industries (P) Ltd, Kolenchery, Kerala, 682311, India.
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
Article
44
1. Introduction
Covid-19, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2),
was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 has spread worldwide claiming more
than 766,895,075 confirmed cases, including 6,935,889 deaths worldwide as of 24 May 2023,
as reported by WHO (1). On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared
it as a pandemic (2). Despite substantial efforts to manage and control the pandemic, morbidity,
and mortality due to COVID-19 and its variants have led to significant alterations in daily
life. Continuous viral evolution, the lack or limited availability of vaccines, and wave after
wave of outbreaks have posed significant challenges to resource-limited countries such as
Nepal in responding to the pandemic Nepal detected its first COVID-19 case on 23 January
2020,when a 31-year-old student, who had returned to Kathmandu from Wuhan on 9 January
2019, tested positive for the disease. On 4 April 2020, the first locally transmitted case was
diagnosed in Kailali District and the first death occurred on 14 May 2019[3]. Since then, the
number of cases has increased dramatically to 1003,307 confirmed cases of Covid-19 with
12,031 deaths, as reported to WHO. As of 23 May 2023, a total of 61,933,902 vaccine doses
have been administered in Nepal [4].
There has been a high influx of publications on the COVID-19 worldwide since its
origin. Nepal too had a substantial number of publications on the same, and there was a need
to track the most relevant and impactful to the scientific community through bibliometric
analysis.High-cited papers provide interesting information about the contributors, articles and
topics which are influential in the research community during a certain period and have a
greater chance of visibility, thus attracting greater attention among researchers [5]. Evaluating
the top cited publications content is therefore very useful for obtaining information about the
trends of specific fields in the perspective of research progress [6]
Although many bibliometric studies have been performed in relation to COVID-19 in
general [6] but specific subject of the Covid-19 research in Nepal has so far attracted
comparatively less attention from researchers. A few bibliometric studies have been published
on assessment of global Covid-19 research literature in South Asia countries [7-11], which
make the quantitative and qualitative assessment by way of analyzing various features of
research output and citations. Although one study by Raut, Sah et al [12] has examined Covid-
19 publications in Nepal, but it covered only 72 indexed publications from Scopus database
published till 17 July 2020.
Keeping the above mentioned literature gap in Nepal Covid-19 research in view, we
decided to undertake the present study focusing on the analysis of top 100 high-cited papers
published on Covid-19 research in Nepal till 16.5.2023 as reported in Scopus database. The
main objectives of the present study are to study the trends and general characteristics of
literature in Covid-19 in Nepal, identify the major players (organizations and authors), major
themes being persued using significant keywords and leading channels of communications,
besides understanding the co-occurrence of significant keywords.
2. Methods
Studies published between December 2019 and 16.5.2023 on Covid-19 research from Nepal
were retrieved from the Scopus database using a pre-defined search strategy. From the 1157
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
B.M. Gupta, at al
45
studies retrieved, 100 were identified and assumed as high-cited papers (HCPs) having 31 or
more citations. From the 100 HCPs, information about publications outputs, c such as countries,
institutions, journals, keywords, citation counts, collaboration, funding, document and source
type was identified. Data analysis and visualization were conducted using Microsoft Excel,
VOSviewer and Bibliometrix R software.
TITLE-ABS-KEY (“COVID 19” OR “2019 novel coronavirus” OR “coronavirus 2019” OR
“SARS-CoV-2” OR “SARS-CoV 2” OR “coronavirus disease 2019” OR “2019-novel CoV
OR “2019 ncov” OR “COVID 2019” OR “corona virus 2019” OR “nCoV-2019” OR ncov2019
OR “nCoV 2019 OR 2019-ncov OR covid-19 OR “Severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2” OR “Novel Coronavirus”) AND (LIMIT-TO (AFFILCOUNTRY , “Nepal”)).
3. Results
3.1 Overall Picture
Of the 1157 papers indexed in Scopus database on Covid-19 in Nepal till 16.5.2023, the top
100 (9.46%) high-cited papers registered 31 to 1507 citations, averaging 118.55 CPP. The top
100 HCPs, consists of 52 articles, 24 reviews, 13 letters, 7 editorials, 3 notes and 1 short
survey. Yearwise distribution of top 100 HCPs indicate 59 papers in 2020, 33 papers in 2021
and 8 papers in 2022. Of the top 100 HCPs, 85 HCPs involve international collaboration
(ICPs) and they together registered 11003 citations, averaging 129.45 CPP. Among ICPs, the
largest participation comes from India (n=50), followed by USA (N=35), U.K. (n=31), Saudi
Arabia (n=28), Colombia and Australia (n=26 each), China (n=22), Japan and Pakistan (n=13
each), Bangladesh (n=14), et al. Of the top 100 HCPs, only 29 received external funding
support from international and national agencies and they together received 3931 citations,
averaging 135.55 CPP. The major agencies supporting external funded research include
National Institutes of Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations and National Health & Medical
Research Council (5 papers each), The Wellcome Trust and US Agency for International
Development(3 papers each), Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medical Research
Council (2 papers each), etc.
By type of research, it was observed that epidemiology research contributed the largest share
(25.0%) in 100 HCPs, followed by clinical studies (19.0%), pathophysiology (10.0%), risk
factors (9.0%), complications (5.0%) and genetics (2.0%)
By type of population group studied, it was observed that adults constituted the largest share
(23.0%) in top 100 HCPs, followed by middle aged (13.0%), child & adolescents (10.0%)
and aged (9.0%).
3.2 Analysis by Broad and Narrow Subjects
3.21 Broad Subjects
By classifying top 100 HCPs by Scopus subject categories, it was observed that Medicine
contributed the largest share (75.0%), followed byBiochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology
(15.0%), Immunology & Microbiology (9.0%), Neuroscience (7.0%), etc. In terms of citation
impact, Veterinary Science registered the highest (189.0) citations per paper and Social Sciences
the least (41.83) (Table 1).
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
Scientometric Analysis of Top 100 High Cited Papers on COVID-19 Research
46
S.No Name of broad subject* TP TC CPP %TP
1 Medicine 75 9649 128.65 75.00
2 Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology 15 1468 97.87 15.00
3 Immunology & Microbiology 9 622 69.11 9.00
4 Neuroscience 7 1010 144.29 7.00
5 Social Sciences 6 251 41.83 6.00
6 Agricultural & biological Sciences 6 285 47.50 6.00
7 Pharmacology, Toxicology & Pharmaceutics 3 316 105.33 3.00
8 Computer Science 3 131 43.67 3.00
9 Psychology 3 246 82.00 3.00
10 Veterinary Science 1 189 189.00 1.00
Nepal Total 100 11855 118.55
TP= Total papers; TC=Total citations; CPP=Citations per paper
There is an overlapping of literature under various subjects and as a result there
some total is more than 100%
3.2.2. Significant Keywords
A total of 1813 keywords were identified from the 100 HCPs on Covid-19 research in
Bangladesh. The frequency of occurrence of keywords indicates their importance in this area.
The analysis of 1813 keywords revealed a lack of research focus and continuity, with the
majority of keywords (93.77%) occurring only 1-4 times.The 36 significant keywords selected
with a frequency of 5 or more from 1686 keywords are presented in Table 2. Here keywords
are arranged by number of occurrences. The leading significant keywords were: “Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (n=69), “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” (n=48) “Virus Pneumonia”
(n=31), “Virology” (n=17), “Disease Transmission” (n=14), “Prevention & Control” (n=13),
“Vaccination(n=11), etc.
The analysis of 1813 keywords revealed a lack of research focus and continuity, with
the majority of keywords (93.77%) occurring only 1-4 times. To further explore the thematic
clusters, a co-occurrence network of selected keywords was visualized in Figure 1. The network
consisted of 37 nodes connected by 418 links, with a total of 1229 link strengths. This
visualization provides valuable insights into the main topics within the research field. Four
clusters, represented by different colors, were identified: red (medical aspects), green (clinical
aspects), blue (psychological and social aspects), and yellow (preventive measures and
vaccination). The red cluster focused on understanding severe respiratory symptoms, with
keywords like “severe acute respiratory syndrome,” “Hydroxychloroquine,” and Virus
Replication” being prominent. The green cluster highlighted respiratory complications and
mechanical ventilation, while the blue cluster explored disease transmission and the
Table 1. Distribution of Papers by Broad Subjects
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
B.M. Gupta, at al
47
psychological impact of quarantine. The yellow cluster emphasized coronavirus disease
prevention, control, and vaccination. Overall, these findings indicate a lack of research focus
but provide insights into different aspects of Covid-19 research.
Table 2: Selected Keywords
S No Keyword Occ TLS Cluster color S No Keyword Occ TLS Cluster color
1 Severe Acute 48 249 Red 19 Coughing 7 41 Green
Respiratory Syndrome
2 Hydroxychloroquine 9 80 Red 20 Zoonosis 7 47 Green
3 Virus Replication 8 57 Red 21 Artificial 6 35 Green
Ventilation
4 Angiotensin 7 53 Red 22 Diagnosis 6 51 Green
Converting Enzyme 2
5 Antivirus Agent 7 51 Red 23 Intensive 6 44 Green
Care Unit
6 Adult Respiratory 6 45 Red 24 Dyspnea 5 47 Green
Distress Syndrome
7 Immunology 6 43 Red 25 Hospitalization 5 34 Green
8 Remdesivir 6 54 Red 26 Zoonoses 5 32 Green
9 C Reactive Protein 5 33 Red 27 Disease 14 86 Blue
Transmission
10 Drug Therapy 5 31 Red 28 Quarantine 12 74 Blue
11 Favipiravir 5 48 Red 29 Psychology 8 32 Blue
12 Immune Response 5 31 Red 30 Mental Health 6 29 Blue
13 Lopinavir Plus 5 47 Red 31 Anxiety 5 18 Blue
Ritonavir
14 Tocilizumab 5 46 Red 32 Gene Sequence 5 34 Blue
15 Virus Pneumonia 33 180 Green 33 Coronavirus 92 340 Yellow
Disease 2019
16 Pneumonia, Viral 29 149 Green 34 Prevention And 13 61 Yellow
Control
17 Virology 17 102 Green 35 Vaccination 11 41 Yellow
18 Pathology 8 65 Green 36 Infection 6 31 Yellow
Prevention
OCCUR=Number of Occurrences of keywords; TLS=Total link strength
Figure 1: Selected all keywords network
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
Scientometric Analysis of Top 100 High Cited Papers on COVID-19 Research
48
3.3. Most Productive Journals
The 100 Nepal High-Cited Papers (HCPs) in Covid-19 were published in 70 journals. The
distribution of HCPs by reporting journals is widely scattered, i.e., 54 journals published one
paper each, 8 journals published 2 papers each, 6 journals published 3 papers each and 2
journals published 4 and 8 papers each respectively. The top 16 journals (Table 3) published
2 to 8 papers and together published 46 papers and 6929 citations, accounting for 46.0% and
58.45% share in Nepal total HCPs and their citations. Among the top 16 journals, the journal
“Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease” emerges as the most productive journal with eight
publications and a significant total citation count of 2087. It also exhibits a high citation per
paper (CPP) value of 260.875, indicating the impact and recognition of the published research.
“Frontiers in Public Health” follows closely with four publications and 447 citations, with a
corresponding CPP of 111.750. Similarly, “Anna ls of Clinica l Microbiology and
Antimicrobials,” “Asian Journal of Psychiatry,” and “Infezioni in Medicina” showcase three
publications each, with varying citation counts and CPP values (Table 3).
Noteworthy journals such as “Plos One,” “Psychiatry Research,” and “The Lancet”
also demonstrate impactful research, each with three publications and notable citation counts.
“The Lancet” stands out as a prominent multidisciplinary journal with a diverse range of
research topics. Other journals in the list, including “Agricultural Systems,” “Critical Care,”
“Journal of Travel Medicine,” and Leukemia,” among others, contribute to the research
landscape within their respective fields. While they may have a smaller number of publications,
their citation counts and impact indicators suggest a considerable influence on the scholarly
community (Table 3).
Journals like “Nature Medicine,” “New England Journal of Medicine,” “Pathogens,”
and “The Lancet Psychiatry” showcase higher citation counts and CPP values, indicating
their importance in the field of medicine and biomedical research. Among the 70 journals, 15
met the threshold. These 15 journals are scattered in 7 different colored clusters with 19 links
and 28 total link strengths (Figure 2).
Table 3: Most Productive Journals
Journal Name TP TC CPP
1 Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 8 2087 260.875
2 Frontiers In Public Health 4 447 111.750
3 Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 3 206 68.667
4 Asian Journal of Psychiatry 3 245 81.667
5 Infezioni In Medicina 3 628 209.333
6 Plos One 3 149 49.667
7 Psychiatry Research 3 302 100.667
8 The Lancet 3 249 83.000
9 Agricultural Systems 2 110 55.000
10 Critical Care 2 154 77.000
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
B.M. Gupta, at al
49
Journal Name TP TC CPP
11 Journal of Travel Medicine 2 78 39.000
12 Leukemia 2 197 98.500
13 Nature Medicine 2 485 242.500
14 New England Journal of Medicine 2 897 448.500
15 Pathogens 2 123 61.500
16 The Lancet Psychiatry 2 572 286.000
Total of 16 journals 46 6929 150.63
Nepal total of HCPs 100 11855 118.55
Share of top 24 journals in Nepal 100 HCps 46.0 58.45
TP= Total papers; TC=Total citations; CPP=Citations per paper
Figure 2- Co-citation Network of Journals
3.4. Most Productive & Impactful Authors
In all 115 Nepalese authors participated in Nepal Covid-19 research, of which 94
contributed 1 papers each, 13 authors 2 papers each, 5 authors 3 papers each and 1 author
each 4 and 5 papers and 1 author 22 papers. The top 21 authors individually contributed 2 to
22 papers and these together contributed 72papers and 9464 citations, accounting for 72.0%
and 79.83% share each in global publications and citations of Nepal HCPs. On further analysis,
it was observed that 3 authors contributed more than the average group productivity (3.43) of
all 21 authors: R. Sah (n=22), P. Sharma (n=5) and C.L. Ranabhat (n=4). Five authors have
registered citations per paper and relative citation index above the group average (131.44 and
1.11) of all 21 authors: B.R. Shrestha (479.5 and 4.04), D. Aryal (335.0 and 2.83), M. Chatterjee
(171.33 and 1.45), R. Sah (71.09 and 1.44) and G.S. Shrestha (138.0 and 1.16). Table 4 presents
the bibliometric profile of top 21 most productive authors having published 2 or more papers.
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
Scientometric Analysis of Top 100 High Cited Papers on COVID-19 Research
50
The national collaboration among top 21 authors is very weaks. Only few authors have only
one to one bilateral collaborative link among themselves.
S.No Author Af filiation TP TC CPP RCI
1 Sah R Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, 22 3764 171.09 1.44
Kathmandu
2 Sharma P Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur 5 474 94.80 0.80
3 Ranabhat, C.L. Global Center for Research & Development, 4 224 56.00 0.47
Kathmandu
4 Rayamajhee B Kathmandu Research Institute for Biological 3 251 83.67 0.71
Sciences
5 Chatterjee JM Lord Buddha Education Foundation, Kathmandu 3 514 171.33 1.45
6 Aryal D Nepal Intensive Care Research Foundation, 3 1005 335.00 2.83
Kathmandu
7 S. Shrestha National Health Research & Innovation 3 107 35.67 0.30
Foundation, Lalitpur
8 Shrestha, A National Cancer Hospital & Research Center, 3 235 78.33 0.66
Lalitpur
9 Shrestha, B.R. Kathmandu Medical College & Teaching 2 959 479.50 4.04
Hospital
10 Bastola, A Sukraraj Tropical & Infectious Disease Hospital, 2 260 130.00 1.10
Kathmandu
11 G. Rasul International Center for Integrated Mountain 2 106 53.00 0.45
Development, Kathmandu
12 Shrestha, G.S Tribhvan University Teaching Hospital 2 276 138.00 1.16
13 Shrestha, D.B. Mangalbare Hospital 2 102 51.00 0.43
14 S.Bhattarai Global Institute of Interdisclinary Studies 2 167 83.50 0.70
15 B.K. Lal Epidemiology and Disease Control Division, 2 260 130.00 1.10
Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepa
16 R.M. Mehta National Public Health Laboratory, Kathmandu 2 73 36.50 0.31
17 H.C.Ojha Epidemiology and Disease Control Division, 2 260 130.00 1.10
Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepa
18 K.K. Aryal Abt Associates Nepal, Lalitpur 2 80 40.00 0.34
19 Dhungane, P Far Western University, Mahendragarh 2 166 83.00 0.70
20 Mahotra, N.B. Tribhuvan University, Department of Clinical 2 80 40.00 0.34
Physiology, Kathmandu
21 Subedi, A Tribhuvan University Teaching Hosp, Institute 2 101 50.50 0.43
of Medicine, Kathmandu
Total of top 21 authors 72 9464 131.44 1.11
Nepal total of HCPs 100 11855 118.55 1.00
Share of 21 authors in Nepal 100 HCPs 72.0 79.83
TP= Total papers; TC=Total citations; CPP=Citations per paper; RCI=Relative citation index
Table 4: Bibliometric Profile of Top 21 Authors (2 or more papers)
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
B.M. Gupta, at al
51
S.No Name of the author Affilaition of the author TP TC CPP
1 A.J. Rodriquez- Fundacion Universitaria Autonoma des las Americas, 19 3593 189.11
Columbia
2 A.A.Rabaan John Hopkins Aramvo Healthcare, Saudi Arabia 14 3078 219.86
3 K.Dhama Indian Veterinary Research institute, Bareilly, India 11 2836 257.82
4 R. Tiwari Indian Veterinary Research institute, Bareilly, India 9 1217 135.22
5 S.K.Patel Indian Veterinary Research institute, Bareilly, India 6 550 91.67
6 M.Pathak Indian Veterinary Research institute, Bareilly, India 6 550 91.67
6 M.I. Yatoo Indian Veterinary Research institute, Bareilly, India 5 804 160.80
7 S.M.Y.Arafat Enam Medical College & Hospital, Bangladesh 5 473 94.60
8 S.K.Kar King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, India 5 473 94.60
9 R.Kabir Anglia Ruskin University, Bangladesh 4 418 104.50
10 S. Shrestha Monash University, Malaysia 3 110 36.67
11 D.Aryal Amsterdam University Medical Center, Netherlands 3 1019 339.67
12 A.Paniz-Monddolfi Hopital Infantil de Mexico, Mexico 3 1796 598.67
TP= Total papers; TC=Total citations; CPP=Citations per paper
3.4.1.Role of Foreign Authors
Since of 85% of the Nepal HCPs in covid-19 involve international collaboration, it will be
useful to identify top 12 most collaborative foreign authors collaborating most with Nepal
authors. These 12 foreign authors are listed in Table 5.Since of 85% of the Nepal HCPs in
covid-19 involve international collaboration, it will be useful to identify top 12 foreign authors
collaborating most with Nepal authors. These 12 foreign authors are listed in Table 7. By
publication productivity, the largest contribution (n=19 each) were made by A.J. Rodriquez-
Morales, followed by A.A.Rabaan (n=14), K.Dhama (n=11) and R. Tiwari (n=9). K.Dhama
registered the highest (257.82) citation per paper among the top 12 foreign authors A.Paniz-
Monddolfi registered the highest (598.67) citation per paper among the top 12 foreign authors,
followed by by K. Dhama (257.82), A.A.Rabaan (219.86), A.J. Rodriquez-Morales (189.11).
John Hopkins Aramvo Healthcare, Saudi Arabia (207.4).
Table 5. List of Foreign Authors Most Actively Collaborating with Nepalese Authors
3.5 Most Productive & Impactful Organizations
In all 65 Nepalese organizations participated in Nepal Covid-19 research, of which 35
organizations contributed 1 paper each, 14 organizations 2 papers each, 11 organizations 3
papers each, 2 organizations 4 papers each and 1 author each 5, 20 and 36 papers each. The
top 30 organizations individually contributed 2 to 36 papers and these together contributed
130 papers and 16166 citations, accounting for more than 100.0% share each in Nepal
publications and citations from HCPs. On further analysis, it was observed that 3 organizations
contributed more than the average group productivity (4.33) of all 30 organizations: Tribhuvan
University(n=36), Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (n=20) and Patan Academy of
Health Sciences, Lalitpur (n=5). Nine organizations have registered citations per paper and
relative citation index above the group average (124.35 and 1.05) of all 30 organizations:
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
Scientometric Analysis of Top 100 High Cited Papers on COVID-19 Research
52
S No Affiliation TP TC CPP RCI
1 Tribhuvan University 36 4682 130.06 1.10
2 Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital 20 3425 171.25 1.44
3 Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur 5 525 105.00 0.89
4 Chitwan Medical College, Bhatatpur 4 166 41.50 0.35
5 Global Center for Research & Development, Kathmandu 4 249 62.25 0.53
6 National Public Health Laboratory, Kathmandu 3 132 44.00 0.37
7 Policy Research Institute, Kathmandu 3 206 68.67 0.58
8 Kathmandu Research Institute of Biological Sciences 3 251 83.67 0.71
9 Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu 3 307 102.33 0.86
10 Nepal Cancer Hospital & Research Center, Lalitpur 3 283 94.33 0.80
11 Lod Buddha Education Foundation 3 514 171.33 1.45
12 Ministry of Health & Population 3 327 109.00 0.92
13 International Center for Integrated Mountain Development, 3 162 54.00 0.46
Kathmandu
14 National Health Research & Innovation Foundation, Lalitpur 3 107 35.67 0.30
15 KIST Medical College & Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur 3 172 57.33 0.48
16 Nepal Medicity Hospital 3 900 300.00 2.53
17 Sukraraj Tropical & Infectious Diseases Hospital, Kathmandu 2 262 131.00 1.11
18 Golden Community, Research Center 2 265 132.50 1.12
19 Epidemiology & Disease Control Division, Govt. of Nepal 2 260 130.00 1.10
20 B.P. Koirala Institute of Medical Sciences, Dharan 2 97 48.50 0.41
21 Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital & 2 92 46.00 0.39
Research Center, Pokharan
22 National Academy of Medical Sciences 2 178 89.00 0.75
23 Kathmandu Institute of Applied Sciences 2 159 79.50 0.67
24 Nepal Intensive Care Research Foundation 2 897 448.50 3.78
25 Kathmandu Medical College & Teaching Hospital 2 959 479.50 4.04
26 Mangalbare Hospital 2 102 51.00 0.43
27 Global Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies 2 80 40.00 0.34
28 Abt Associates Nepal, Lalitpur 2 80 40.00 0.34
29 Far Western University, Mahendragarh 2 166 83.00 0.70
30 Kathmandu University, Palpa 2 161 80.50 0.68
130 16166 124.35 1.05
100 11855 118.55 1.00
TP= Total papers; TC=Total citations; CPP=Citations per paper; RCI=Relative citation index
Kathmandu Medical College & Teaching Hospital (479.5 and 4.04), Nepal Intensive Care
Research Foundation (448.5 and 3.78), Nepal Medicity Hospital (300.0 and 2.53), Lord Buddha
Education Foundation (171.33 and 1.45), Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (17.25 and
1.44), Golden Community, Research Center (132.5 and 1.12), Sukraraj Tropical & Infectious
Diseases Hospital, Kathmandu (131.0 and 1.11), Tribhuvan University (130.06 and 1.10) and
Epidemiology & Disease Control Division, Govt. of Nepal (130.0 and 1.10). Table 6 presents
the bibliometric profile of top 30 most productive organizations having published 2 or more
papers.
Table 6. Bibliometric Profile of Top 30 Organizations (2 or more papers)
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
B.M. Gupta, at al
53
3.5.1. Role of Foreign Organizations
Since of 85% of the Nepal HCPs in covid-19 involve international collaboration, it will be
useful to identify top 10 foreign organizations collaborating most with Nepal organizations.
These 10 foreign organizations are listed in Table 7. By publication productivity, the largest
contribution (n=19 each) were made by Fundacion Universitaria Autonoma des las Americas,
Columbia and Universidad Technologica Tribhuvan Perreira, Columbia, followed by John
Hopkins Aramvo Healthcare, Saudi Arabia (n=15), Indian Veterinary Research Institute,
Bareilly, India (n=12), University of Oxford, U.K (n=11) and UNSW, Sydney, Australia (n=10
Universidad Cientifica del Sur registered the highest (447.25) citation per paper among the
top 10 foreign organizations, followed by Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly
(238.42), University of Toronto, Canada (225.86). John Hopkins Aramvo Healthcare, Saudi
Arabia (207.4),
Table 7. List of Foreign Organizations Most Actively Collaborating with Nepalese
Organizations
S.No Name of the organization TP TC CPP
1 Fundacion Universitaria Autonoma des las Americas, Columbia 19 3439 181.00
2 Universidad Technologica Tribhuvan Perreira, Columbia 19 3548 186.74
3 John Hopkins Aramvo Healthcare, Saudi Arabia 15 3111 207.40
4 Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), Bareilly, India 12 2861 238.42
5 University of Oxford, U.K. 11 1828 166.18
6 UNSW, Sydney, Australia 10 794 79.40
7 Harvard Medical School, USA 9 1487 165.22
8 University of Toronto, Canada 7 1581 225.86
9 Mahidol University, Thailand 7 454 64.86
10 Universidad Cientifica del Sur 4 1789 447.25
TP= Total papers; TC=Total citations; CPP=Citations per paper
3.6. Top 10 High Cited Papers
These 100 HCPS fall in following citation range: 38 papers (31-50 citations range), 26 papers
(51-100 citations), 34 papers (101-500 citations) and 2 papers (916-1507 citations). The paper
with themost number of citations was 1512 times by Rodriguez-Morales et al. and was published
inTravel Medicine and Infectious Disease(IF 4.589). This was followedby the article by
Phua et al., in the journal The Lancet Respiratory Medicine(IF25.09).Thisarticlewascited
920 times to date. A list of top 10 most high-cited papers are given in Table. Most of the top 10
HCPs involve international collaboration and received international funding and were published
in journals with high impact factor.
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
Scientometric Analysis of Top 100 High Cited Papers on COVID-19 Research
54
4. Summary & Conclusion
This study provided an insight into understanding of research status including trends and the
most influential contributions. It has identified the leading countries, institutions, journals, hotspots
and development trend in the field that could provide the foundation for further investigations.
The bibliometric analysis will help the clinicians to rapidly identify the potential collaborative
partners, identify significant studies, and research topics within their domains of Covid-19
research in BangladeshThe above study examined top 100 high-cited papers in Covid-19
research in Nepal, focusing on the trends and characteristics of research, by identifying the
main and sub-type types of subjects contributing to Covid-19 research and their distribution by
type of research and population age groups. More than 75% of literature in Covid-19 research
S.No Name of authors Title Source TC
1 Rodriguez-Morales, Clinical, laboratory and imaging features Travel Medicine and
A.J, Bonilla-Aldana, of Covid-19: A systematic review and Infectious 1512
D.K, Sah, R et al meta-analysis Disease,2020, 34, art.
no. 101623,
2 Phua, J., Shrestha, Intensive care management of coronavirus The Lancet Respiratory
B.R. et al disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges Medicine, 2020, 8(5), 920
recommendations
3 Goligher, E.C, Aryal, Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin New England Journal
D et al. in critically ill patients with covid-19 of Medicine, 2021, 385 460
(9), pp. 777-789
4 Lawler, P.R, Aryal, D Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin New England Journal
et al. in noncritically ill patients with Covid-19 of Medicine, 2021, 385 444
(9), pp. 790-802
Solis Arce, J.S. Covid-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy Nature Medicine, 2021,
5 Kharel, A et al. in low and middle-income countries 27 (8), pp. 1385-1394 432
Rabaan, A.A., Sah, R SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS Infezioni in Medicina,
6 et al. CoV : A comparative overview 2020, 28 (2), pp. 174 401
184
Suicide trends in the early months of the
7 Pirkis, J., Marahatta, Covid-19 pandemic : an interrupted time The Lancet Psychiatry,
K et al. series analysis of preliminary data 21 2021, 8 (7), pp.579- 327
countries
Iwendi, C., COVID-19 patient health prediction using Frontiers in Public
8 Chatterjee, J.M et al. boosted random forest algorithm Health, 2020, 8, art. no. 254
357
Kola, L, Luitel, N.P Covid-19 mental health impact and Kola, L, Luitel, N.P et
et al responses in low-income and middle- al
9 income countries: reimagining global The Lancet Psychiatry, 246
mental health 2021, 8 (6), pp.535-
550
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic
KC, A, Gurung, R., response on intrapartum care, stilbirth, and The Lancet Global
10 Sunny, A.K. Basnet, neonatal mortality outcomes in Nepal: a Health, 2020, 8 (10), 227
O et la prospective observational study pp. e1273-11281
Table 8. List of Top 10 HCPs
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
B.M. Gupta, at al
55
involved foreign collaboration and as a result the author identified leading foreign organizations
and authors participation in Covid-19 research from Nepal. The study also identified the leading
organizations and authors participating in Covid-19 research in Nepal, besides identifying leading
journals publishing research in this area.
At the institutional level, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital
and Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur were the most productive organizations
(n=36, 20 and 5) and Kathmandu Medical College & Teaching Hospital (479.5 and 4.04),
Nepal Intensive Care Research Foundation (448.5 and 3.78), Nepal Medicity Hospital (300.0
and 2.53) received the highest CPP and RCI. At the author level, R. Sah, P. Sharma and C.L.
Ranabhat were the most productive authors (n=22, 5 and 4) and B.R. Shrestha (479.5 and
4.04), D. Aryal (335.0 and 2.83) and M. Chatterjee (171.33 and 1.45) were the most impact
authors in terms of CPP and RCI. At the journal level, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease,
Frontiers in Public Health, Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials and Asian
Journal of Psychiatry were the most productive journals (n=8, 4, 3 and 3) and The Lancet
Psychiatry (286.0), Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease (260.87), Frontiers In Public Health
(111.75) and Psychiatry Research (100.67) were the most impactful in terms of CPP.
The analysis of HCPs on Nepal HCPs on Covid-19 suggests that the epidemiology
and clinical studies were the most researched areas (with 25.0% and 19.0% publication share).
The priorities were also studies through their distribution by population age groups. Here the
most researched groups were adults and middle aged (23.0% and 13.0%). There is a limitation
in the study, as only Scopus database was only searched. It may be possible that some potentially
valuable information may have been missed. However, use of multiple databases may lead to
other difficulties of merging existing data in different databases, which pose significant problems.
In this bibliometric study, we identified and analysed the top 1006 high-cited publications
on Nepal Covid-19 research from 1157 papers indexed in Scopus Database since the origin if
Covid-19 virus till beginning of May 2023. The research is widely scattered as few organizations
and authors contributing the most. Most of the funding received came from foreign agencies
and 75% of total research involved international collaboration. In order to improve research
environment and research output, one needs to encourage the government to invest more in
R&D and also increase substantially national collaboration among various partcipitating
organizations.
References
1. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Overview.24 May 2023. https://
covid19.who.int/
2. WHO. Situation Reports. (2021). Available online at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-
source/coronaviruse/wou_2021_ 1March2021.pdf?sfvrsn =18b1db33_1 & download=
true
3. Shrestha R, Shrestha S, Khanal P, et al. Nepal’s first case of COVID-19 and public
health response. J Med 2020;27:taaa024. doi:10.1093/jtm/taaa024Google Scholar
4. WHO Coronavirus (Covid-19) Dashboard. Nepal.24 May 2023. https://covid19.who.int/
5. Fardi A. Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endo. 2011;37(9):1183-90.
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
Scientometric Analysis of Top 100 High Cited Papers on COVID-19 Research
56
6. Gupta BM, Dhawan SM, Ahmed KK Mueen, Mamdapur Ghouse Modin. Global research
on Covid-19 disease: A scientific assessment of publications during 2020-21.
International Journal of Medicine and Public Health. 2021;11(2):76-84
7. Gupta, B. M., Dhawan, S. M. and Surulinathi, M. Select South Asian Countries in
Covid-19 Research: A Bibliometric Assessment of their Publications during 2019-21.
Journal of Young Pharmacists, 2021, 13(3S), s19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/
jyp.2021.13s.67
8. Koser, N.(2022). Bibliometric analysis of contribution of South Asian Countries in
research conducted on Covid-19. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Explorer, 2(11), 25- 38. https://doi.org/10.1212/IJMRE.2022685715
9. Gupta, B.M. (2021). India’s Research on Covid-19: A Scientometric Assessment of
Publications 2019-21. J Young Pharm, 13(3), S30-S41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5530/
jyp.2021.13s.68
10. Shah, S.A.H.; & Shaikh, A. (2020). COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) and bibliometrics of
Pakistani research. Lambert Academic Publishing
11. Gupta, B. M., Kappi, M., Walke, R., & Bansal, M. Covid-19 research in Bangladesh: A
scientometric analysis during 2020-23. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement
and Communication, 2023, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.445
12. Raut, R., Sah, R., Dixit, K., Rodriguez-Morales, A. J., Marco, Z., Dhama, K., and Lee,
A. A review of the scientific contributions of Nepal on Covid-19. Current Tropical
Medicine Reports, 2021, 1-8, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-021-00247 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-021-00247-0
Indian Journal of Information Library & Society, 36, 1-2 (2023) : 43-56
B.M. Gupta, at al
... Although numerous studies have been conducted in the past to identify and examine the high-cited papers (HCPs) in the various sub-fields of medicine at the global level, such as health care24 , health policy 25 , etc., except for UK26 . However, few bibliometric studies have been undertaken to study specific sub-fields of medical research in South Asia 27 , India 28-31 , Bangladesh 32 , and Nepal level[33][34][35] , but no bibliometric study has been undertaken which examined high-cited publications in the health and medical sciences at the national level in Nepal. ...
Article
Nepal's medical research output has grown significantly over the three decades. Most (around 95%) of Nepal's highly-cited research involved international collaboration, with only a small portion being purely national. Additionally, about half received external funding. These findings highlight the importance of collaboration and funding for impactful research in Nepal. The leading research areas include non communicable diseases, followed by infectious diseases and maternal/child health. Notably, all of Nepal's top medical institutions contributed to these publications.
... These papers provide valuable insights into influential contributors, articles and topics, attracting greater attention among researchers. [4] Although many bibliometric studies exist on the assessment of global COVID-19 research literature in South Asia countries, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] only one study exists on the assessment of COVID-19 publications from Bangladesh. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives We aimed to analyse the highly-cited papers on COVID-19 research from Bangladesh. This study used bibliometric methods to examine the characteristics and trends of COVID-19 research in the country. Material and Methods To source publication data for the study, the Scopus database was used, until 26th July 2023, employing a specific search strategy. The search yielded 4124 papers, which were then rearranged based on the frequency of citations to obtain the highly cited papers (HCPs), which received 100 or more citations. Results The 110 (2.67%) HCPs registered citations ranging from 100 to 1502, with an average of 236.21 Citations per Paper (CPP). Only 30.9% of the publications received external funding and and received an average CPP of 332.0. Similarly, 80% of the HCPs were involved in international collaboration, and and received an average of 249.89 CPP. The major international contributors were the USA, Australia, U.K., and China. The most productive organisations were Jahangirnagar University, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, and University Of Dhaka. The most impactful organisations were Neurogen Children’s Healthcare, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, and Begum Rokeya University. Three most productive authors were Mamun, M.A. (n=8), Saiful Islam, M. (n=6), Tajuddin Sikder, Md. and Bodrud-Doza, Md. (n=4 each). Conclusion This study provides the current status of research on COVID-19, including its trends and the most significant contributions from Bangladesh. It has highlighted the top authors, organisations, journals, and research hotspots in the field of COVID-19 research. This information can also help researchers identify potential collaborators, relevant papers, and important research questions in their areas of expertise.
... 29 This analysis provides valuable insights into the collaborative landscape among institutions within the field of research. Co-authorship analysis plays a vital role in assessing research quality within an academic discipline 30 Being a bibliometric study, it suffers from the drawbacks and limitations of such a scientific study. Although, bibliometrics analysis is a valuable tool, but it should be used alongside other methods for a comprehensive understanding of research activity and impact and should not be taken as the sole measure of research quality. ...
Article
Decoding India's Research on Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Bibliometric Analysis (1994-2023) Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune condition impacting millions globally. Understanding research trends in this field is crucial for improving diagnosis, treatment, and ultimately, patient outcomes. Our recent publication in the Journal of Nepal Health Research Council sheds light on India's contribution to RA research over the past three decades (1994-2023) through a bibliometric analysis. What is Bibliometrics? Bibliometrics is a field that uses quantitative analysis to assess research output. By examining factors like publication numbers, citations, and collaborations, we gain valuable insights into research trends and areas of focus. Key Findings of the Study Growth in Publications: The study identified over 1600 publications by Indian researchers on RA, reflecting a steady rise in research activity over the years. Citation Impact: These publications garnered over 36,800 citations, indicating significant global recognition of Indian research in this area. Collaboration and Funding: The study highlights a trend towards increased collaboration between Indian research institutions. Additionally, a significant portion of the research received external funding, which is a positive sign for future advancements. Leading Institutions and Authors: The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) emerged as the most productive institutions. Individual researchers like Dr. A. Aggarwal, Dr. R. Misra, and Dr. A. Chopra were identified as the most prolific contributors. Focus Areas: The research primarily focused on clinical studies (diagnosis and management), pathophysiology (understanding the disease process), and treatment outcomes. Notably, "Rheumatoid Arthritis," "Methotrexate" (a common RA medication), and "Rheumatoid Factor" were the most frequent keywords used, indicating a strong emphasis on these aspects. Significance of the Study This bibliometric analysis provides valuable insights for Indian researchers and policymakers. It highlights the strengths and potential areas for improvement in India's RA research. The findings can guide future research efforts by: Identifying areas where further exploration is needed. Encouraging collaboration among researchers and institutions. Highlighting impactful research areas that can attract more funding. Future Directions By understanding our research landscape, we can strategically steer future endeavors. This will allow Indian researchers to play an even more prominent role in the global fight against RA. This summary provides a brief overview of our research. If you'd like to delve deeper, you can access the full publication here (DOI: https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.5061).
... 12 We concur that the HCPs can influence the research frontier and attract more readership and thus can create a substantial influence. 13,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Ennis et al. evaluated the 50 most cited articles on PJI. They observed that the most common Levels of Evidence of these papers were 2 and 3, and the clinical outcomes were the most common article types. ...
Article
Background and aims: Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a serious clinical problem after Arthroplasty. The research field on PJI is emerging, but there is a paucity of information on the most impactful publications on it. This prompted us to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the global research output, from 2003 to 2022, to identify the growth of publications, the key players in this research field and to evaluate the characteristics of highly-cited publications (HCPs) on the PJI. Methods: Publications related to PJI research were identified globally from the Scopus database, using specific keywords, covering the literature from 2003 to 2022. The HCPs were considered those with 100 or more citations. Information on publication year, citation count, funding sources, title, author, journal, country, institution, research area, and strategic keywords were collected from these HCPs. Publication data was imported into Microsoft Excel and analyzed further using VOSviewer and R software. Results: There were 182 HCPs (3.12%), which received a total citation of 124701 (average CPP of 21.41), with the citation range from 100 to 1921. Research articles were the most predominant publications (69.2%), but their average citations per paper (CPP) of 189.78 was lower than that of Review articles (average CPP: 253.17). The USA has been the leading country in terms of total publications (31.58%), and HCPs (36.99%), followed by Switzerland, Spain, UK and China. There were no HCPs from developing countries. J. Parvizi of Thomas Jefferson University, USA (with a total publications of 31 and an average CPP of 315.7), and W. Zimmerli of Basel University , Switzerland (with a TP of 11 and an average CPP of 341.9), were the most productive and impactful authors in PJI global research output. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis identified the most productive and impactful authors, organizations, countries, and journals in the research of PJI, of the last two decades.
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to analyse the characteristics, trends, current status and hotspots in Pakistan COVID-19 research output. We retrieved the relevant literature on Pakistan COVID-19 from the Scopus database from 2020 to 2023. Bibliometric and visualisation analysis was undertaken using MS Excel and VOSviewer software. Results: In all 7,749 papers on Pakistan COVID-19 research was published in 1,471 sources contributed by 12,633 authors affiliated to 5,305 institutions. The 17.77% share of 7749 Pakistan publications received external funding support and 64.64% publications were involved in international collaboration with 86 foreign countries. Among foreign countries, Saudi Arabia, China and the USA collaborated with Pakistan in almost half of Pakistan's collaborative publications. The Aga Khan University, Karachi and Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi contributed the highest number of publications. I. Ullah and S. Ahmad contributed the most, while A.M. Baig and Z.A. Bhutta registered the highest average citations per paper. The Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal (n=222) and Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association (n=176) published the most papers. Only 2.33% share of its total publications were considered as High-Cited Papers (HCPs), as they received 100 to 1,609 citations. This study will provide an opportunity to scholars and policy-makers to understand the overall trends, current status and research hotspots in Pakistan's COVID-19 research, help in identifying the future subject areas of collaboration and may be used as a valuable reference for future research.
Article
Full-text available
Highly Cited Papers (HCPs) are influential sources of information that highlight trend-setting areas of research and identify key players within a subject. This study aims to measure the research performance of Pakistan in COVID-19-related research from 2020 to 2023, focusing specifically on HCPs that have received more than 100 citations. A bibliometric approach was employed to analyse COVID-19 research papers from Pakistan, with data sourced from Scopus. The period covered was from 2020 to 2023. The analysis included metrics such as the number of HCPs, citation counts, international collaboration, and funding sources. A total of 7602 COVID-19-related papers were published by Pakistani researchers, of which 164 (1.59%) were classified as HCPs. These HCPs collectively registered 38,244 citations, averaging 233.10 citations per paper. International collaboration was evident in 81.71% of these HCPs, and 32.92% were funded by external agencies. The USA, China, UK, and Saudi Arabia were identified as the leading international collaborating partners. Despite the high collaboration rates, the average productivity per organization in Pakistan was low, with only 6.32 HCPs per organization. Similarly, the average productivity of 31 research authors was 2.48 HCPs per author. International collaboration has positioned Pakistan at the centre stage in COVID-19 research, with external funding significantly enhancing research quality. However, the share of HCPs remains less than 2% of Pakistan's total COVID-19-related publications, indicating a significant gap between the quantity and quality of research output. This suggests that while Pakistan has made notable contributions, there remains substantial potential for addressing the ongoing health challenges posed by COVID-19 through enhanced research efforts.
Article
Full-text available
Background and Aims: Highly cited papers (HCPs) can influence both research and clinical practice. They help to identify core literature and important advances in a field. This study aimed to assess the current status and prospects of South Asia COVID-19 research from the HCPs using bibliometric indicators. Methodology: COVID-19 literature from South Asia published between December 2019 and 29 November 2023 in the Scopus database was analysed. The top HCPs, having more than 200 citations, were evaluated. Information about citation counts, authors and organisations and their affiliations, year of publication, source journal, geographical origin, subject, article type, funding details, etc. were retrieved and analysed. Data and visualisation analysis was undertaken using Microsoft Excel and other bibliometric software. Results: The 298 South Asia HCPs were published from 2020 to 2023 and were cited 200–3,596 times, with a mean average of 413.9 citations per paper (CPP). Around 24.5% and 51.3% of HCPs received external funding support and were involved in international collaboration, respectively. The most productive organisations were the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, and the Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, while the most impactful organisations were Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, and Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital & Medical Research Institute, Mumbai. The most productive journals were Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. Conclusions: This study has identified core and significant authors, organisations, journals, subject fields and significant keywords, collaborators and funding agencies involved in South Asia’s COVID-19 research.
Article
Full-text available
Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a serious clinical problem after Arthroplasty. The research field on PJI is emerging, but there is a paucity of information on the most impactful publications on it. This prompted us to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the global research output, from 2003 to 2022, to identify the growth of publications, the key players in this research field and to evaluate the characteristics of highly-cited publications (HCPs) on the PJI. Methods- Publications related to PJI research were identified globally from the Scopus database, using specific keywords, covering the literature from 2003 to 2022. The HCPs were considered those with 100 or more citations. Information on publication year, citation count, funding sources, title, author, journal, country, institution, research area, and strategic keywords were collected from these HCPs. Publication data was imported into Microsoft Excel and analysed further using VOSviewer and R software. Results- There were 182 HCPs (3.12%), which received a total citation of 124701 (average CPP of 21.41), with the citation range from 100 to 1921. Research articles were the most predominant publications (69.2%), but their average citations per paper (CPP) of 189.78 was lower than that of Review articles (average CPP: 253.17). The USA has been the leading country in terms of total publications (31.58%), and HCPs (36.99%), followed by Switzerland, Spain, UK and China. There were no HCPs from developing countries. J. Parvizi of Thomas Jefferson University, USA (with a total publications of 31 and an average CPP of 315.7), and W. Zimmerli of Basel University, Switzerland (with a TP of 11 and an average CPP of 341.9), were the most productive and impactful authors in PJI global research output. Conclusion- This bibliometric analysis identified the most productive and impactful authors, organizations, countries, and journals in the research of PJI, of the last two decades.
Article
Full-text available
Objective. We examined the bibliometric characteristics of 3616 Bangladesh’s publications on Covid-19 during 2020-2023. For this purpose, we used quantitative and qualitative bibliometric indicators. Design/Methodology/Approach. Bangladesh publications on Covid-19 during 2020-2023 were retrieved using the Scopus database. From each record, we retrieved data on the title, author, organizations, journal, publication type and source, country, collaboration, funding, topic and keywords. They were exported to MS-Excell for bibliometric analysis, and VOSviewer software was used for analyzing keyword co-occurrence networks. Results/Discussion. The Bangladesh-related Covid-19 papers in the Scopus database constitute 3616 papers, which hold 50th global rank with 0.75% share in global output and registered 14.63 average citations per article (CPP). The 732 (21.52%) out of 3616 Bangladesh papers attracted external funding support, and 2493 (72.28%) have participated in international collaboration. The U.K., USA, India and Saudi Arabia contributed the most to Bangladesh’s international collaborative papers. The University of Dhaka, Jahangirnagar University, North South University and Daffodil International University were the most productive organizations. In contrast, CHINTA Research, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Jahangirnagar University and Jashore University of Science & Technology registered the highest impact. The most preferred communication channels were PLOS One, Heliyon, Frontiers in Public Health and Annals of Medicine & Surgery. The Asian Journal of Psychiatry, IEEE Access, Science of the Total Environment and BMJ Global Health registered the highest citations. Clinical studies were the most frequent category, followed by epidemiology, risk factors and diagnosis. In contrast, adults and the middle-aged formed the largest population age groups, followed by aged, children and adolescents. Conclusion. The bibliometric analysis of Covid-19 research has evolved global interest, including in Bangladesh. For the first time, the present study throws light on the current status and publication trends of research and development efforts in Bangladesh.
Book
Full-text available
BACKGROUND: Novel corona virus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been declared as pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO). This manuscript reviews two aspects of COVID-19 including its prevalence in world’s top nine countries compared with eight South Asian counterparts and bibliometrics of COVID-19 related research trends among Pakistani researchers. METHODS: The COVID-19 related data of Pakistani authors from 22 online journals/databases were searched and divided into four major groups: Group-I: Articles with Pakistani authors only; Group-II: Joint articles with authors within Pakistan and either all Pakistani abroad or authors from other countries; Group-III: Pakistani authors with editing or publication of e-books or manuals, and Group IV: Unpublished data of Pakistani authors. RESULTS: The confirmed COVID-19 cases (as accessed on April 17, 2020) from top to low were found in United States>Spain>Italy>France>Germany>United Kingdom>China>Iran>Turkey; while among South Asian the similar rank was in India>Pakistan>Bangladesh>Afghanistan>Sri Lanka>Nepal>Maldives>Bhutan, respectively. Based on the content of the studies (n=83), highest percentage covered the general aspects of disease (35.37%), followed by methods (19.51%), issues and policy (8.54% each); models and survey (7.32% each); genomes and medicinal plants (3.66% each); e-books (2.44%); and library/information professionals, manual and unique study (health related statements of Prophet MuhammadSAW, 1.22% each). CONCLUSION: A complete or partial lockdown along with staying home and maintaining social distance strategy ensures the minimum local COVID-19 transmission as a global practice and its impact is also reflected on research outcome of Pakistani contributors.
COVID-19) Dashboard. Overview.24
  • Who Coronavirus
WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Overview.24 May 2023. https:// covid19.who.int/
Nepal's first case of COVID-19 and public health response
  • R Shrestha
  • S Shrestha
  • P Khanal
Shrestha R, Shrestha S, Khanal P, et al. Nepal's first case of COVID-19 and public health response. J Med 2020;27:taaa024. doi:10.1093/jtm/taaa024Google Scholar 4. WHO Coronavirus (Covid-19) Dashboard. Nepal.24 May 2023. https://covid19.who.int/ 5. Fardi A. Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endo. 2011;37(9):1183-90.
Mamdapur Ghouse Modin. Global research on Covid-19 disease: A scientific assessment of publications during 2020-21
  • B M Gupta
  • S M Dhawan
  • K K Ahmed
  • Mueen
Gupta BM, Dhawan SM, Ahmed KK Mueen, Mamdapur Ghouse Modin. Global research on Covid-19 disease: A scientific assessment of publications during 2020-21. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health. 2021;11(2):76-84
Bibliometric analysis of contribution of South Asian Countries in research conducted on Covid-19
  • N Koser
Koser, N.(2022). Bibliometric analysis of contribution of South Asian Countries in research conducted on Covid-19. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Explorer, 2(11), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1212/IJMRE.2022685715
A review of the scientific contributions of Nepal on Covid-19
  • R Raut
  • R Sah
  • K Dixit
  • A J Rodriguez-Morales
  • Z Marco
  • K Dhama
  • A Lee
Raut, R., Sah, R., Dixit, K., Rodriguez-Morales, A. J., Marco, Z., Dhama, K., and Lee, A. A review of the scientific contributions of Nepal on Covid-19. Current Tropical Medicine Reports, 2021, 1-8, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-021-00247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-021-00247-0