Researchers from different fields of study applied numerous theories to study and understand users’ online information privacy concerns, behaviours, attitudes, preferences, as well as the outcomes of their behaviours on the website. Up to date, there are only a few studies that reviewed and integrated theories in the literature to produce an integrated theoretical framework for online information privacy. This study reviewed twelve theoretical frameworks used in online information privacy. It followed the common approach of the literature review. The initial search resulted in over 102 studies from ScienceDirect, EBSCO and Scopus databases. The findings of the study revealed that reviewed theoretical frameworks have limitations recognized in the literature which include conflicting norms/duties, as well as overlapping spaces, minimization of emotional response, ignorance of biological differences and hormonal responses, missing of constructs, such as trust and explicit focus on the individuals. There were also criticisms of reviewed theoretical frameworks noted in the literature such as oversimplified views of social influence on individuals, theories not falsifiable and the use of surveys as a form of cultural inquiry. Finally, the findings of the study revealed open issues in online information privacy such as hidden cookies, unsecured location sharing, scanning cyber security, as well as data never forgetting individuals. The study recognizes that there are various theories or frameworks in this field, all of which deal with privacy behaviour, implying that studies in the future should combine theories or frameworks to better understand users’ online information privacy perceptions.Keywordsonline information privacytheoretical frameworkinformation disclosure