Content uploaded by Rubaid Ashfaq
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Rubaid Ashfaq on May 14, 2024
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 43
Uncovering the Impact of Social Media Disseminated
Misinformation on Public Health: A Study of the
Effects of False and Misleading Information on Social
Media on Consumer Health Behaviours and Decision
Making
Ms. Nishtha Sachdev1, Dr Rubaid Ashfaq2*
1Amity School of Communication Amity University India
2*Associate Professor, Amity School of Communication, Amity University India
Corresponding Email: 2*rubaidashfaq@gmail.com
Received: 14 February 2023 Accepted: 29 April 2023 Published: 17 June 2023
Abstract: Human beings are inquisitive creatures who are always looking for new
information everywhere they go, and from everyone they meet. In the current tech savvy
scenario, we seek information from various Social Media platforms. There is significant
proclivity in the way information reaches the audience the speed at which it reaches the
audience. Social media is a very powerful medium of spreading any kind of information, but
not all information is right and useful for the audience. Sometimes the information shared
on social media can be misleading and have negative impacts on the course of life of the
audience which is consuming it. In adverse situations the information available on public
health can either be a boon or curse for the audience. The objective of this study is to
understand the impact social media disseminated misinformation has on the decision
making of people, further uncovering the impact it has on their health. The data will be
collected by conducting a survey with the audience that spends a significant amount of their
day on social media platforms. Data will also be collected by reading various papers on
misinformation regarding public health.
The study will aid in understanding if the impact of misinformation on public health is
positive or negative and in which proportion.
Keywords: Social Media, Disseminated Misinformation, Consumer Health Behaviors,
Health Literacy, Risk Perception, Online Communication.
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 44
1. INTRODUCTION
Evolution has taught us one very important thing and that is the importance of knowledge and
learning new things on a daily basis. The learning happens by getting information through
different sources. The sources could be our friends, family, teachers , books , websites blogs
and social media platforms. As humans we are eager to learn every bit of news that is happening
around us and then pass it on to our near and dear ones without giving it a second thought. This
passing on of unsolicited information and advice can create adverse situations in someone
else’s life. The practice of disseminating misinformation evolved with humans too – from
passing on misinformation verbally to sending it forward through social media multiplied it
effect on the way people see their lives and try adapting to the forwarded misinformation.
There are various Social Media platforms which provide information on all fields of life and
Public Health is one of them. People are blindly following the information available on this
topic, which is not a very sensible thing to do.
With the increasing use of the internet and media to communicate our thoughts and ideas to
people we must learn to have a sense of judgement while consuming media. In a day we come
across numerous posts, articles blogs and videos which provide us information on everything
including public health. We need Media literacy in order to educate ourselves about where to
get this information from and what to take seriously and what should be shared with other
people. We must have the capability to understand the difference between misleading
information and facts. Media Literacy will help us evaluate the sources we use to consume the
information and then educate us about which ones to trust when it comes to our health.
Specialists and wellbeing experts are among those best positioned to invalidate falsehood and
direct clients to data sources that are proof based. Countermeasures incorporate mindfulness
lobbies for patients and medical services experts, stages with proof-based information, the
consideration of logical proof in wellbeing related content in broad communications, and
endeavors to further develop media and wellbeing proficiency.
"Advancing and spreading reliable wellbeing data is pivotal for legislatures, wellbeing
specialists, analysts, and clinicians to offset bogus or misdirecting wellbeing data scattered in
web-based entertainment," the dissertation states. It features that virtual entertainment channels
can likewise be utilized to counter bogus or deluding data, however that further examinations
might be expected to assess the best arrangement for such effort and to figure out which
channels turn out best for various populaces, geological settings, and social settings.
1.1 Objectives of the Study
The objective of this study is to:
Understand the impact social media disseminated misinformation has on the decision
making of people.
Uncovering the impact of these decisions on their health.
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 45
Review of Literature
Misinformation & Fake News
Nowadays, concerns regarding health misinformation—defined as misleading information that
is purposefully, accidentally, or erroneously spread—usually center on anti-vaccine material.
This is significant because there has been a correlation between rising anti-vaccine beliefs and
a rise in measles outbreaks in the US. As they should, social media sites like Facebook,
Instagram, YouTube, and Pinterest are taking action to stop the propagation of anti-vaccine
content on their networks.
However, there are other forms of false information that we come across frequently. You have
probably seen advertising for miracle treatments, game-changing dietary supplements, or quick
weight loss plans if you watch television or use social media.
These misleading and unconfirmed cases can impact our day-to-day choices and can adversely
affect the general's wellbeing. Elhajjar & Oaida (2022) examined the fake news and
misinformation which leads to deception.
Deception can be intense or ongoing. A case that eating only meat will prompt fast weight
reduction is intense since it tends to be handily rectified by wellbeing specialists sharing
realities in actuality. Conversely, ongoing deception is generally connected to individual or
social convictions or standards and is in this manner more hard to cure in any event, when there
is information running against the norm.
The thought processes in sharing deception fluctuate. Some offer misleading substance without
monitoring its incorrectness. Others purposefully course bogus substance to confound,
misdirect, or for monetary benefit. Also, others feel that it is their commitment to share this
substance since they genuinely accept the proof is off-base and their feelings or stories are a
significant disclosure that will save others.
Public Health
Perceiving that deception can adversely affect the general's wellbeing is a certain something.
Tending to and restricting the effect of falsehood is trying for some reasons. As far as one might
be concerned, studies propose that bogus data spreads more rapidly than truth via virtual
entertainment stages. Also, the manner in which falsehood or bits of hearsay spread via online
entertainment shifts by subject. For instance, entertainers producing falsehood on diet and
exercise, could vary from those spreading against immunization messages. The spread of
hostile to immunization content is supported by bots and savages, while significant patrons of
diet and exercise deception could incorporate organizations, superstars, and web-based
entertainment powerhouses. Al-Samydai & Al-Kholaifeh (2019) suggested that another
justification for why restricting deception content is testing is that cases are not generally
unequivocally expressed however the data is introduced in a manner that permits people to
reach dangerous determinations.
There are numerous fad diets available on the social media platforms which promise people of
curing their illnesses in an easy way which is attractive to the audience. This method is then
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 46
shared with someone who might use and take it seriously but there is no guaranteed cure and
there are no facts supporting the theory. The recommendations attract the audience, and they
adapt these major lifestyle changes without giving it a thought.
There are exercises being shown by the influencers on social media which the audience follows
regardless of the fact that what their body allows and what is better for their bodies. The
audience does not keep their injuries in mind before following such exercises and this leads to
major harm.
This is simpler for particular kinds of wellbeing falsehood, (for example, hostile to antibody
messages) than others. Boyer (2011) conducted a study on the sorts of falsehood that push
conduct changes with commitments of further developed wellbeing could require master like
a nutritionist's-assessment. These substances are typically somewhat precise (e.g., beetroots
have medical advantages) however the outlining and asserts are off base (e.g., beetroots can fix
a wide range of joint torment and irritation).
While tech organizations, social researchers, and general wellbeing authorities are looking for
answers for address the spread of against immunization messages via online entertainment
stages, we should contemplate the possible effects of different sorts of falsehood that impact
day to day wellbeing choices. We don't need our sisters, girls, and moms to accept that
embedding jade eggs into their vaginas will fix hormonal issues.
Infodemic
This term Infodemic was coined during the Pandemic so that people would stop spreading false
information about the COVID 19 flu and misleading the crowd and creating havoc amongst
the masses. Van Looy (2022) conducted a study to assess the parameters of disseminating
information on health. There were rumors being spread about the vaccine causing major health
issues and rumors were being spread to such extent that people were holding riots against
doctors and nurses who were just trying to be helpful. The Government was being blamed and
false information was the root cause of all the mis happenings. The dissemination of
misinformation lead to the masses avoiding the vaccine and attacking the health providers. It
creates turmoil and chance taking ways of behaving that can hurt wellbeing. It additionally
prompts doubt in wellbeing specialists and subverts the general wellbeing reaction. Infodemic
the executives are the methodical utilization of hazard and proof-based examination and ways
to deal with deal with deal with deal with the infodemic and diminish its effect on wellbeing
ways of behaving during wellbeing crises.
Infodemic the board intends to empower great wellbeing rehearses through 4 kinds of
exercises:
Paying attention to local area concerns and questions
Advancing comprehension of chance and wellbeing master guidance
Building flexibility to falsehood
Connecting with and engaging networks to make a positive move.
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 47
Population’s Need of Information on Public Health -During a Health Emergency
The Coronavirus pandemic has featured the horde ways individuals look for and get wellbeing
data, whether from the radio, papers, their nearby neighbor, their local area wellbeing laborer,
or progressively, on the screens of the telephones in their pockets. The pandemic's going with
infodemic, a staggering of data, including mis-and disinformation following a wellbeing crisis,
has overpowered people, networks, and wellbeing frameworks. Neiger, Thackeray, Hanson,
West & Fagen (2012) conducted a study on excess of data, or data over-burden, can prompt
individuals to have data evasion, for example, attempting to keep away from the news or
switching off cautions on their telephones. This affects how they get data, and getting
dependable, precise data to them turns out to be more difficult when individuals limit the
wellsprings of data they counsel. This applies to both wellbeing laborers and people. In this
manner, tuning in and understanding those data needs and ways of behaving is basic for
mounting a successful crisis reaction.This new truth of how data is provided food and served
by calculations via online entertainment and web takes care of for people and how they counsel
various sources implies more adaptable methodologies are expected to all the more likely
screen and comprehend the data climate individuals and networks live in. Repeating different
kinds of feedback that go neglected across time and topography can make favorable places for
falsehood. For instance, discussions about general wellbeing and social estimates presented in
one nation could influence talk in another country. Worries about immunization aftereffects
could be commandeered and fictionalized to spread sincerely upsetting falsehood about
antibodies hurting weak individuals. Kotov (2015) examined stories of worry that were left
neglected in networks frequently would reemerge during Coronavirus. Different kinds of
feedback about wellbeing, particularly about arising wellbeing subjects that element agitated
science is genuine, however in the event that they are not completely tended to, less solid
sources will make up for the shortfall. This makes wellbeing data and deception unique in
relation to different kinds of falsehood that were talked about before the pandemic in areas of
decisions and environmental change.
Consequently, a methodical way to deal with checking infodemics and creating infodemic bits
of knowledge that are reproducible, and proof based are required. While observing discussions
and the data climate on wellbeing subjects, individuals will communicate questions, concerns,
disarray, and stories that can educate the entire regarding the crisis reaction, consequently
working on the probability of populace acknowledgment and adherence to wellbeing direction,
medicines, diagnostics and general wellbeing and social measures. Infodemic experiences
proposals might incorporate explaining befuddling wellbeing direction, further developing
assistance conveyance, further developing gamble correspondence, extending local area
commitment, or reinforcing wellbeing laborer limit.
Today, WHO's prepared infodemic administrators, north of 1,300 from more than 142 nations,
have extended how they might interpret the complicated data climate and what it means for
wellbeing frameworks and wellbeing crisis reactions. Over 95% of Part States detailed
following wellbeing falsehood and it keeps on being quite difficult for different episodes and
crises. The learnings from these encounters are that we really want to more readily locate
among on the web and disconnected information sources to make an extensive image of how a
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 48
populace's inquiries, concerns, data voids, stories and circling mis-and disinformation
influence their insights, perspectives, and conduct. Calloway & Reach (2011) studied about
expanding on this experience and in wide meeting from working infodemic supervisors across
UN organizations and worldwide general wellbeing accomplices, impending direction on
coordinating different datasets in examining and understanding infodemics in unambiguous
populaces and settings will be distributed in a manual by WHO and accomplices.
From the absolute first infodemiology gathering and the first WHO worldwide infodemic
director stages of preparation in quite a while, of morals have been examined while leading
social tuning in and infodemic the board exercises. In mid-2023, WHO met a morals board on
morals of social tuning in and infodemic the executives, with impending direction for wellbeing
specialists that leading social tuning in and infodemic bits of knowledge age, planning and
carrying out infodemic the executives mediations, and building general wellbeing frameworks
to elevate strength to wellbeing deception.
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Philosophy is characterized as the various advances that are trailed by a scientist to
lead a broad essential or optional exploration in view of the topic of a specific on-field or off-
field research. In this examination approach different apparatuses, information assortment
technique, number of respondents, goals of this exploration.
The essential information was collected or assembled through an overview with a designed or
normalized survey. This integrates assembling direct information by asking the respondents
straightforwardly/talking inquiries. The essential work was done utilizing exploratory and
unmistakable examinations. The accentuation is on acquiring experience and commonality for
later examination or when issues are at a primer examination level. A survey was made to get
a total thought on the impacts and validity of media revealing and struggle detailing. The
respondent's comments gives the unmistakable thought of their perspectives about the
equivalent. The study was made web based, utilizing comfort examining, and connect was
shipped off respondents. I tended to the respondents through email, web-based entertainment
and WhatsApp.
Research Tools
For this research, tool used was questionnaire that was built to carry out the research. A
survey had been carried out on the users of Delhi, Noida, Jamshedpur and Bangalore.
Research Design
A descriptive and experimental design research has been used for conducting this research.
Number of Participants
Data has been collected from 150 respondents who were contacted over WHATSAPP using
google form.
Data Collection
The data for this research was collected in two ways.:
1.) Primary Data: It is based on the observations gathered from the survey.
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 49
2.) Secondary Data: This information is collected from the research papers, website, journals,
blogs, news articles.
Data Collection & Interpretation
Table 1
Do you use Information on the internet for your Wellbeing?
Response
Yes
88.70%
No
11.30%
The majority i.e., 88.70% is using the internet to seek information regarding their health which
shows only some of the population is careful and vigilant about the information on wellbeing.
The repercussions of deception via web-based entertainment incorporate such adverse
consequences as an expansion in mistaken understanding of logical information, assessment
polarization, raising trepidation and frenzy or diminished admittance to medical services.
Table 2
Consumers tend to adapt Major lifestyle changes after getting information on
Social Media?
Response
Agree
78.98%
Disagree
21.02%
The survey conducted shows that consumers tend to adapt to lifestyle changes through social
media that get help from reliable sources. 78.98% of respondents choose to adapt lifestyle
changes by getting information on social media. Only 21.02% of respondents disagree with
adapting major lifestyle changes through social media disseminated information.
The expanded spread of wellbeing related falsehood in a wellbeing crisis is advanced quickly
by simple admittance to online substance, particularly on cell phones. During emergencies, for
example, irresistible illness episodes and catastrophes, the overproduction of information from
different sources, the nature of the data and the speed at which new data is spread make social
and wellbeing related influences.
Table 3
The Government has banned Influencers from Advertising any Supplements on
Social Media without Proper & Valid Certificates. Are you aware about this?
Response
Yes
46.56%
No
53.44%
The survey shows that the audience is unaware about government regulations regarding the
social media promotion of products without valid certificates. There are only 46.56% people
who are aware of this fact.
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 50
The creators found that web-based entertainment have been proliferating low quality wellbeing
related data during pandemics, philanthropic emergencies, and wellbeing crises at a rising rate.
They note, such spreading of inconsistent proof on wellbeing subjects enhances immunization
aversion and advances doubtful medicines.
Table 4
Response
Do you think the above action is a Right step or Not?
Right
89.97%
Wrong
10.13%
The survey’s results show that people support the government’s regulation regarding the
influencer marketing. 89.97% of respondents are in favor of this.
The efficient survey found that individuals feel mental, social, political as well as financial pain
because of misdirecting and bogus wellbeing related content via virtual entertainment during
pandemics, wellbeing crises and helpful emergencies.
Table 5
Response
Are you aware of the term Infodemic?
Yes
46.98%
No
53.02%
The term infodemic is lesser known to the audience. The survey shows that the only 46.98%
of the respondents are aware of this term and what it actually means.
In any case, not all impacts of online entertainment have been negative during the Coronavirus
pandemic. Eight audits announced positive results, and a few found that few online
entertainment stages created fundamentally further developed information and mindfulness,
higher consistence with wellbeing proposals, and more sure wellbeing related ways of behaving
among clients contrasted with exemplary data spread models.
Table 6
Do You think the audience that shares health related information without giving
any thought to it?
Response
Always
68.79%
Sometimes
21.59%
Never
9.62%
The survey shows that 68.79% of the respondents forward or share health related information
without giving it a second thought. Only 9.62% of respondents give some time and thought
before forwarding health related misinformation.
The dissertation recognizes the job of virtual entertainment in emergency correspondence and
the board during wellbeing crises yet focuses to the need to counter the development of
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 51
deception on these stages. Neighborhood, public and global endeavors are expected, as well as
extra exploration.
Table 7
Do free recommendations and consultations on Social Media Platforms attract
the Audience?
Response
Yes
87.06%
No
12.94%
The survey shows that 87.06% of the respondents are attracted to free recommendations and
consultations available on social media. A very low proportion of respondents do not prefer it.
Future examination ought to explore the adequacy and security of PC driven remedial and
interventional measures against wellbeing falsehood, disinformation and phony news and
designer ways of sharing wellbeing related content via virtual entertainment stages without
contorted informing.
Table 8
Does this increase the Adverse effects on Public Health?
Response
Yes
92.84%
No
7.16%
92.84% of respondents agree to the fact that these free consultations and recommendations lead
to adverse effects on the public health.
The expanded spread of wellbeing related falsehood in a wellbeing crisis is advanced quickly
by simple admittance to online substance, particularly on cell phones. During emergencies, for
example, irresistible illness episodes and catastrophes, the overproduction of information from
different sources, the nature of the data and the speed at which new data is spread make social
and wellbeing related influences.
Table 9
Do you think short cuts are reliable when it comes to health?
Response
Yes
29.87%
No
70.13%
The survey suggests that only 29.87% of respondents rely on shortcuts when it comes to their
health and nutrition. 70.13% respondents are more conscious and are not reliable on shortcuts.
Table 10
Do you prefer Government provided websites for health recommendations or
Social media Platforms?
Response
Government provided websites
25.47%
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 52
Social Media Platforms
64.98%
Both
9.55%
The survey shows that 64.98% of respondents prefer social media platforms over government
provided websites for information on health.
The creators found that web-based entertainment have been proliferating low quality wellbeing
related data during pandemics, philanthropic emergencies, and wellbeing crises at a rising rate.
They note, such spreading of inconsistent proof on wellbeing subjects enhances immunization
aversion and advances doubtful medicines.
Table 11
Is media literacy mandatory for everyone?
Response
Yes
84.69%
No
15.31%
The majority of the respondents agree that media literacy is a must for everyone. 84.69% of
respondents agree with educating the audience on media.
The dissertation recognizes the job of virtual entertainment in emergency correspondence and
the board during wellbeing crises yet focuses to the need to counter the development of
deception on these stages. Neighborhood, public and global endeavors are expected, as well as
extra exploration.
3. CONCLUSION & SUGGESTIONS
People these days are getting ignorant towards making conscious decisions and everyone is
working on Herd Mentality which is adversely affecting their wellbeing. The study shows that
everyone is looking for shortcuts to make their lives better. Smart work is an intelligent way of
doing things, but short cuts often lead to problems. The influencers on Instagram have become
role models for the audience and they tend to imitate every possible habit of these influencers
in order to look like them. The solution to people blindly absorbing and imitating information
is media literacy. And this has to be started from an early age as there is no control over the
dissemination of information and the sharing of the same.
There are numerous fad diets available on the social media platforms which promise people of
curing their illnesses in an easy way which is attractive to the audience. This method is then
shared with someone who might use and take it seriously but there is no guaranteed cure and
there are no facts supporting the theory. The recommendations attract the audience and they
adapt these major lifestyle changes without giving it a thought.
There are exercises being shown by the influencers on social media which the audience follows
regardless of the fact that what their body allows and what is better for their bodies. The
audience does not keep their injuries in mind before following such exercises and this leads to
major harm.
There were rumors being spread about the vaccine causing major health issues and rumors were
being spread to such extent that people were holding riots against doctors and nurses who were
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 53
just trying to be helpful. The Government was being blamed and false information was the root
cause of all the mis happenings. The dissemination of misinformation lead to the masses
avoiding the vaccine and attacking the health providers.
Evolution has taught us one very important thing and that is the importance of knowledge and
learning new things on a daily basis. The learning happens by getting information through
different sources. The sources could be our friends , family, teachers , books , websites blogs
and social media platforms. As humans we are eager to learn every bit of news that is happening
around us and then pass it on to our near and dear ones without giving it a second thought. This
passing on of unsolicited information and advice can create adverse situations in someone
else’s life. The practice of disseminating misinformation evolved with humans too – from
passing on misinformation verbally to sending it forward through social media multiplied it
effect on the way people see their lives and try adapting to the forwarded misinformation.
There are various Social Media platforms which provide information on all fields of life and
Public Health is one of them. People are blindly following the information available on this
topic, which is not a very sensible thing to do.
For the majority of Twitter's set of experiences, its newsfeed was direct: The application
showed tweets backward sequential request.
Last year, the organization's designing group uncovered how its ongoing calculation functions.
Likewise with Facebook and YouTube, Twitter currently depends on a profound learning
calculation that has figured out how to focus on satisfied with more noteworthy earlier
commitment. By searching through Twitter's information, the calculation has instructed itself
that Twitter clients are bound to keep close by on the off chance that they see content that has
proactively gotten a ton of retweets and makes reference to, contrasted and content that has
less.
4. REFERENCES
1. Ahuja, K., Bala, I. (2021). Role of Artificial Intelligence and IoT in Next Generation
Education System. In: Al-Turjman, F., Nayyar, A., Devi, A., Shukla, P.K. (eds)
Intelligence of Things: AI-IoT Based Critical-Applications and Innovations . Springer,
Cham.
2. Ali, A., Magdy, W., & Vogel, S. (2013, July). A tool for monitoring and analyzing
healthcare tweets. In HSD workshop, SIGIR 2013.
3. Al-Samydai, M., Al-kholaifeh, A., & Al-Samydai, A. (2019). The impact of social media
in improving patient’s mental image towards healthcare provided by private hospitals’ in
Amman/Jordan. Indian J Public Health Res Dev, 10(2), 491-49.
4. Alsughayr, A. R. (2015). Social media in healthcare: uses, risks, and barriers. Saudi
Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 3(2), 105.
5. Anitha, K. (2021). Social Media Data Analysis: Rough Set Theory Based Innovative
Approach. In: Al-Turjman, F., Nayyar, A., Devi, A., Shukla, P.K. (eds) Intelligence of
Things: AI-IoT Based Critical-Applications and Innovations . Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82800-4_9
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 54
6. Antonucci, L. (2020). Third international conference on Data Science & Social Research.
7. Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in
marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79-95.
8. Ashfaq, R. (2021). Study and Analysis of 5G Enabling Technologies, Their Feasibility
and the Development of the Internet of Things. In: Al-Turjman, F., Nayyar, A., Devi, A.,
Shukla, P.K. (eds) Intelligence of Things: AI-IoT Based Critical-Applications and
Innovations . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82800-4_5
9. Ashfaq, R. (2023). Caste System and Indian Media: A Complex Relationship. Journal of
Media, Culture and Communication (JMCC) ISSN: 2799-1245, 3(02), 1-6.
10. Ashfaq, R., & Nabi, Z. (2022). Media Literacy and Learning: Conceptual Contribution in
the Field of Media Education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and
Educational Studies, 3(4), 1-11. doi: 10.21608/ihites.2021.107738.1082
11. Boyer, C. (2011). Social media for healthcare makes sense. Frontiers of health services
management, 28(2), 35-40.
12. Calloway, J., & Reach, C. S. (2011). Social media management tools. GPSolo, 28, 54.
13. Courtney, K. (2013). The use of social media in healthcare: organizational, clinical, and
patient perspectives. Enabling health and healthcare through ICT: available, tailored and
closer, 183, 244.
14. Dr. Rubaid Ashfaq, Ms. Zeba Nabi, & Dr. Rohit. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and the
Indian Media Industry: the Future is Now. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Machine
Learning and Neural Network (JAIMLNN) ISSN: 2799-1172, 2(06), 24–31.
https://doi.org/10.55529/jaimlnn.26.24.31
15. Dr. Rubaid Ashfaq. (2022). Social Behaviours in Virtual Reality. Journal of Social
Responsibility,Tourism and Hospitality(JSRTH) ISSN 2799-1016, 2(05), 12–16.
https://doi.org/10.55529/jsrth.25.12.16
16. Dr. Rubaid Ashfaq. (2023). Caste System and Indian Media: A Complex Relationship.
Journal of Media,Culture and Communication(JMCC) ISSN:2799-1245, 3(02), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.55529/jmcc.32.1.6
17. Elhajjar, S., & Ouaida, F. (2022). Use of social media in healthcare. Health Marketing
Quarterly, 39(2), 173-190.
18. Gamache-OLeary, V., & Grant, G. (2017, January). Social media in healthcare.
In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
19. Garg, A., Singh, A.K. (2021). Applications of Internet of Things (IoT) in Green
Computing. In: Al-Turjman, F., Nayyar, A., Devi, A., Shukla, P.K. (eds) Intelligence of
Things: AI-IoT Based Critical-Applications and Innovations . Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82800-4_1
20. Kaplan, A. M. (2015). Social media, the digital revolution, and the business of
media. International Journal on Media Management, 17(4), 197-199.
21. Kotov, A. (2015). Social Media Analytics for Healthcare. Healthcare data analytics, 1,
309-340.
22. Lambert, K. M., Barry, P., & Stokes, G. (2012). Risk management and legal issues with
the use of social media in the healthcare setting. Journal of Healthcare Risk
Management, 31(4), 41-47.
Journal Healthcare Treatment Development
ISSN: 2799-1148
Vol: 03, No. 04, June-July 2023
http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JHTD
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jhtd.34.43.55
Copyright The Author(s) 2023.This is an Open Access Article distributed under the CC BY
license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) 55
23. Malita, L. (2011). Social media time management tools and tips. Procedia computer
science, 3, 747-753.
24. McGowan, B. S., Wasko, M., Vartabedian, B. S., Miller, R. S., Freiherr, D. D., &
Abdolrasulnia, M. (2012). Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and
meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information. Journal of
medical Internet research, 14(5), e2138.
25. Miller, A. R., & Tucker, C. (2013). Active social media management: the case of health
care. Information Systems Research, 24(1), 52-70.
26. Montalvo, R. E. (2011). Social media management. International Journal of Management
& Information Systems (IJMIS), 15(3), 91-96.
27. Neiger, B. L., Thackeray, R., Van Wagenen, S. A., Hanson, C. L., West, J. H., Barnes,
M. D., & Fagen, M. C. (2012). Use of social media in health promotion: purposes, key
performance indicators, and evaluation metrics. Health promotion practice, 13(2), 159-
164.
28. Ranney, M. L., & Genes, N. (2016). Social media and healthcare quality improvement: a
nascent field. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(6), 389-391.
29. Sharp, J. (2011). Brand awareness and engagement: a case study in healthcare social
media. Frontiers of health services management, 28(2), 29-33.
30. Taprial, V., & Kanwar, P. (2012). Understanding social media. Bookboon
