... Community disaster resilience (CDR) has become an important social goal that attracts the attention of scientists and decision-makers in various sectors and scientific disciplines (Aleksandrina, Budiarti, Yu, Pasha, & Shaw, 2019;Cvetković, Bošković, & Ocal, 2021;Cvetković & Filipović, 2018;Dufty, 2012;Goyal, 2019;Jehoshaphat & Oghenah, 2021;Jurgens & Helsloot, 2018;Kabir, Hossain, & Haque, 2022;Keck & Sakdapolrak, 2013;Liu & Mishna, 2014). The analysis of the literature on CDR (Aitsi-Selmi, Egawa, Sasaki, Wannous, & Murray, 2015;Akter, Roy, & Aktar, 2023;Aleksandar, Cvetković, & Sudar, 2016;Baruh, Dey, & Dutta, 2023;El-Mougher, Abu Sharekh, Abu Ali, & Zuhud, 2023;Mohammed Mohammed El-Mougher, Sharekh, Ali, & Zuhud, 2023;Fujioka, 2016;Holmes, 2016;Jurgens & Helsloot, 2018;Kabir et al., 2022;Liu & Mishna, 2014;Winderl, 2014) and social identity (SI) has identified a number of shortcomings ( Figure 1) that need to be addressed, which indicate significant importance of the projected research: insufficiently examined the impact of SI on building CDR; there is no consensus on the content and scope of the concept of resilience, on the unique dimensions and indicators of CDR and SI; there are no clearly defined measures and scales of CDR and SI; development of tools to measure CDR are at the emerging stage insufficiently developed, undeveloped generic framework of CDR that could be applied to different social communities; insufficiently developed procedures for designing and validating tools for measuring CDR; insufficiently examined influences systematized indicators of SI on building CDR; some CDR frameworks have been developed specific to a particular disaster and some other for a specific geographical area; insufficiently developed strategies, recommendations and programs for improving the level of CDR; insufficiently developed and elaborated predictive models of the impact of different variables on the further development of CDR; insufficiently investigated influences of SI (cognitive, evolutionary and emotional dimensions) on strengthening or weakening CDR; the lack of a methodology to engage and empower resilience in society; the complexity of reaching consensus on the unique characteristics of resilient communities among researchers and policy makers; lack of interest of researchers in examining the potential of SI to contribute to CDR due to lack of available data at the local level; the existence of different disciplinary and methodological frameworks for analysing CDR without their deeper analytical connection; tool development and monitoring of CDR progress are critical components requiring extensive research to better understand and apply in practice. The application of the concept of CDR in the domestic demographic, socio-cultural and psychological context is an exciting and fruitful field for discussion (Akter et al., 2023;Baruh et al., 2023;Hossen, Nawaz, & Kabir, 2022) and potential reformulation of the concept of resilience. ...