ArticlePDF Available

MDMA-Assisted Therapy for Severe PTSD: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study

Authors:

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) presents a major public health problem for which currently available treatments are modestly effective. We report the findings of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-site phase 3 clinical trial (NCT03537014) to test the efficacy and safety of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted therapy for the treatment of patients with severe PTSD, including those with common comorbidities such as dissociation, depression, a history of alcohol and substance use disorders, and childhood trauma. After psychiatric medication washout, participants (n = 90) were randomized 1:1 to receive manualized therapy with MDMA or with placebo, combined with three preparatory and nine integrative therapy sessions. PTSD symptoms, measured with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5, the primary endpoint), and functional impairment, measured with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS, the secondary endpoint) were assessed at baseline and at 2 months after the last experimental session. Adverse events and suicidality were tracked throughout the study. MDMA was found to induce significant and robust attenuation in CAPS-5 score compared with placebo (P < 0.0001, d = 0.91) and to significantly decrease the SDS total score (P = 0.0116, d = 0.43). The mean change in CAPS-5 scores in participants completing treatment was -24.4 (s.d. 11.6) in the MDMA group and -13.9 (s.d. 11.5) in the placebo group. MDMA did not induce adverse events of abuse potential, suicidality or QT prolongation. These data indicate that, compared with manualized therapy with inactive placebo, MDMA-assisted therapy is highly efficacious in individuals with severe PTSD, and treatment is safe and well-tolerated, even in those with comorbidities. We conclude that MDMA-assisted therapy represents a potential breakthrough treatment that merits expedited clinical evaluation. Appeared originally in Nat Med 2021; 27:1025-1033.
Related research
Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment:
Safety and Eicacy of MDMA-
Assisted Psychotherapy Compared
to Paroxetine and Sertraline
!"#$%&' ()&&*#'+#,-.-$&-/&'
0'1#'2/'3
Abstract
4$#'"-#)"',5'.$'6 !"#$%&' ()&&*#'+#,-.-$&-/&'
Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment: Safety and Eicacy
of MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy Compared to
Paroxetine and Sertraline
7)8',9:9;<=,
(>?@0,AB',7C)"8-&,CD,4$D'&C8E,4'-"3
,9FG;HI;:JK;FL<=,
M>NI,F:OFFPJQ-11$ODC%)RO9;:9F:F;
!&&$RC8,!,('S)%%$-<=,4$R-,7'"C2'<=, T'""-,U-V-"*W&CR$8RX$<=,0BC6,-&&,J,-)#BC"R<=
5$%X,MC/&$8
5'R'-"%B,N8#'"'R#,0%C"'
FO:
?$#-#$C8R
:
5'%C22'8S-#$C8R
F
5'-SR
9P
Learn about stats on ResearchGate
?C8#'8#,)1&C-S'S,/Y,!&&$RC8,!,('S)%%$- !)#BC",%C8#'8#
Content may be subject to copyright.
Company
!/C)#,)R
T&CE
?-"''"R
Resources
5'R'-"%BZ-#',@1S-#'R
['&1,?'8#'"
?C8#-%#,)R
Business Solutions
\-"X'#$8E,0C&)#$C8R
0%$'8#$D$%,5'%")$#2'8#
])/&$RB'",0C&)#$C8R
!© 2008 - 2023 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved. Terms Privacy Copyright Imprint
(C&&C6,^C)"8-&
Clinical Enterprise
5 Signs of a Reputable
Reference Lab Partner
What traits should you look for to ensure the
best match?
White Paper
Find a partner that gives
you fast, accurate, cost-
effective results.
!S
MC68&C-S
_$'6,2C"'
@8R)%%'RRD)&&Y,#"'-#'S,1CR##"-)2-#$%,R#"'RR,S$RC"S'",G]A0MH,$R,-,R'"$C)R,-8S,&$D'*
#B"'-#'8$8E,S$RC"S'"O,A6C,2'S$%-#$C8R`,1-"C+'#$8',BYS"C%B&C"$S',-8S,R'"#"-&$8'
BYS"C%B&C"$S'`,-"',-11"C.'S,#"'-#2'8#R,DC",]A0M,/Y,#B',(CCS,-8S,M")E
!S2$8$R#"-#$C8,G(M!HO,!8-&YR'R,CD,1B-"2-%C#B'"-1$'R,DC",]A0M,DC)8S,C8&Y,R2-&&
#C,2CS'"-#','DD'%#R,6B'8,%C21-"'S,6$#B,1&-%'/CO,AB',\)&#$S$R%$1&$8-"Y
!RRC%$-#$C8,DC",]RY%B'S'&$%,0#)S$'R,G\!]0H,C/#-$8'S,T"'-X#B"C)EB,AB'"-1Y
M'R$E8-#$C8,GTAMH,D"C2,#B',(M!,DC",;`LK2'#BY&'8'S$C+Y2'#B-21B'#-2$8'
G\M\!HK-RR$R#'S,1RY%BC#B'"-1Y,DC",#"'-#2'8#,CD,]A0M,C8,#B',/-R$R,CD,1CC&'S
-8-&YR'R,RBC6$8E,-,&-"E','DD'%#,R$V',DC",#B$R,#"'-#2'8#O,AB$R,"'.$'6,%C.'"R,S-#-
R)11C"#$8E,TAMO,N8,#B$R,#"'-#2'8#`,\M\!,$R,-S2$8$R#'"'S,6$#B,1RY%BC#B'"-1Y,$8
)1,#C,#B"'',2C8#B&Y,aKB,R'RR$C8RO,]-"#$%$1-8#R,-"',1"'1-"'S,DC",#B'R',R'RR$C8R
/'DC"'B-8S`,-8S,1"C%'RR,2-#'"$-&,-"$R$8E,D"C2,#B',R'RR$C8R,$8,DC&&C6*)1
$8#'E"-#$.',1RY%BC#B'"-1Y,R'RR$C8RO,?C21-"$8E,S-#-,)R'S,DC",#B',-11"C.-&,CD
1-"C+'#$8',-8S,R'"#"-&$8',-8S,1CC&'S,S-#-,D"C2,]B-R',9,R#)S$'R`,\!]0
S'2C8R#"-#'S,#B-#,\M\!K-RR$R#'S,1RY%BC#B'"-1Y,%C8R#$#)#'R,-,R)/R#-8#$-&
$21"C.'2'8#,C.'",-.-$&-/&',1B-"2-%C#B'"-1$'R,$8,#'"2R,CD,R-D'#Y,-8S,'DD$%-%YO
0#)S$'R,CD,\M\!K-RR$R#'S,1RY%BC#B'"-1Y,B-S,&C6'",S"C1C)#,"-#'R,%C21-"'S,#C
R'"#"-&$8',-8S,1-"C+'#$8',#"$-&RO,!R,\M\!,$R,C8&Y,-S2$8$R#'"'S,)8S'",S$"'%#
C/R'".-#$C8,S)"$8E,-,&$2$#'S,8)2/'",CD,R'RR$C8R`,#B'"',$R,&$##&',%B-8%',CD
S$.'"R$C8`,-%%$S'8#-&,C",$8#'8#$C8-&,C.'"SCR'`,C",6$#BS"-6-&,RY21#C2R,)1C8
S$R%C8#$8)-#$C8O,TAM,R#-#)R,B-R,'+1'S$#'S,#B',S'.'&C12'8#,CD,\!] 3<5'-S,2C"'
Public Full-text 1
]-E',F
1
September 2019 | Volume 10 | Article 650
REVIEW
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00650
published: 12 September 2019
Frontiers in Psychiatry | www.frontiersin.org
Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment:
Safety and Efficacy of MDMA-
Assisted Psychotherapy Compared
to Paroxetine and Sertraline
Allison A. Feduccia 1, Lisa Jerome 1*, Berra Yazar-Klosinski 2, Amy Emerson 3,
Michael C. Mithoefer 4 and Rick Doblin 2
1 Department of Research Development and Regulatory Affairs, MAPS Public Benefit Corporation, Santa Cruz, CA, United
States, 2 Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, Santa Cruz, CA, United States, 3 MAPS Public Benefit
Corporation, Santa Cruz, CA, United States, 4 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of
South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
Unsuccessfully treated posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a serious and life-
threatening
disorder.
Two
medications,
paroxetine
hydrochloride
and
sertraline
hydrochloride, are approved treatments for PTSD by the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). Analyses of pharmacotherapies for PTSD found only small to moderate effects
when
compared
with
placebo.
The
Multidisciplinary
Association
for
Psychedelic
Studies (MAPS) obtained Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) from the FDA for
3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for treatment
of PTSD on the basis of pooled analyses showing a large effect size for this treatment.
This review covers data supporting BTD. In this treatment, MDMA is administered
with psychotherapy in up to three monthly 8-h sessions. Participants are prepared
for these sessions beforehand, and process material arising from the sessions in
follow-up integrative psychotherapy sessions. Comparing data used for the approval of
paroxetine and sertraline and pooled data from Phase 2 studies, MAPS demonstrated
that
MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy
constitutes
a
substantial
improvement
over
available pharmacotherapies in terms of safety and efficacy. Studies of MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy had lower dropout rates compared to sertraline and paroxetine trials. As
MDMA is only administered under direct observation during a limited number of sessions,
there is little chance of diversion, accidental or intentional overdose, or withdrawal
symptoms upon discontinuation. BTD status has expedited the development of MAPS
phase 3 trials occurring worldwide, leading up to a planned submission seeking FDA
approval in 2021.
Clinical
Trial Registration:
www.ClinicalTrials.gov,
identifiers
NCT00090064,
NCT00353938, NCT01958593, NCT01211405, NCT01689740, NCT01793610.
Keywords: methylenedioxymethamphetamine, posttraumatic stress disorder, breakthrough therapy, sertraline,
paroxetine, anxiety
Edited by:
Felix Müller,
University Psychiatric Clinic Basel,
Switzerland
Reviewed by:
Tomislav Majic,
Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin,
Germany
Katrin H. Preller,
University of Zurich,
Switzerland
*Correspondence:
Lisa Jerome
ilsa@mapsbcorp.com
Specialty section:
This article was submitted to
Psychopharmacology,
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Received:
26 June 2019
Accepted:
13 August 2019
Published:
12 September 2019
Citation:
Feduccia!AA, Jerome!L,
Yazar-Klosinski!B, Emerson!A,
Mithoefer!MC and Doblin!R (2019)
Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment:
Safety and Efficacy of MDMA-
Assisted Psychotherapy Compared
to Paroxetine and Sertraline.
Front. Psychiatry 10:650.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00650
]-E',9
Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment
Feduccia et al.
2
September 2019 | Volume 10 | Article 650
Frontiers in Psychiatry | www.frontiersin.org
INTRODUCTION
Breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) is one of the Food
and Drug Administration’s (FDA) expedited drug development
pathways. To be eligible for BTD, a sponsor must demonstrate
that the investigational product is intended to treat a serious
and life-threatening condition, with preliminary evidence
supporting a substantial advantage at a clinically signicant
endpoint over existing drugs (1). On August 16, 2017, the FDA
granted breakthrough therapy designation for MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder
(PTSD). This application was among the 45% of applications
granted BTD status in 2017 ( 2). The aim of this review is to
summarize the data and rationale presented in the application
that led FDA to grant this designation.
PTSD is considered a serious and life-threatening disorder
and is associated with increased mortality, cardio-metabolic
morbidity,
and
suicide
risk.
PTSD
negatively
impacts
a
person’s daily life, often resulting in fractured relationships,
depression, decreased daily functioning, diminished cognitive
and psychosocial functioning, substance abuse, and high-cost
healthcare utilization ($34.9 billion in inflation-adjusted charges
for hospitalizations (2002–2011) ( 3). Approximately 7% of the
U.S. population, and 11.2–17.1% of veterans (4), will have PTSD
sometime in their life (5).
Only two drugs, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
(SSRIs)
sertraline
hydrochloride
(Zoloft)
and
paroxetine
hydrochloride (Paxil), are approved oral medications for PTSD
(6–8). These medications and trauma-focused psychotherapies
(e.g., eye movement desensitization, cognitive processing therapy,
prolonged exposure) are recommended asrst-line treatments
for PTSD ( 9–12). In a meta-analysis evaluating psychotherapy
versus
pharmacotherapy,
trauma-focused
psychotherapies
resulted
in
greater
and
longer
lasting
improvements
than
medications ( 12). Meta-analyses and network meta-analyses
found paroxetine, but not sertraline, performed better than
placebo ( 13, 14). Hoskins and colleagues reported that SSRIs
had a small effect size with respect to PTSD symptom reduction.
When compared to a control group, SSRIs either had insignicant
effects or small/moderate effects, while trauma-focused therapies
varied from small to large effects ( 12). The average dropout
rate for the 55 studies included in the meta-analysis was 29%
(0–79%) demonstrating that many individuals fail to tolerate or
respond to available treatments (12), including trauma-focused
psychotherapies, where the dropout can range from 28 to 68%
(15, 16). A network meta-analysis reported that dropout rate for
paroxetine and sertraline was greater than placebo (14).
The Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies
(MAPS)
holds
an
Investigational
New
Drug
Application
(IND)
for
MDMA
as
an
adjunct
to
psychotherapy
for
treatment of PTSD. MAPS has sponsored six phase 2 trials
of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD that lasted from
April 2004 to March 2017. The safety and efficacy results from
these trials were submitted to the FDA, along with a summary
of the sertraline and paroxetine data that supported the New
Drug Application (NDA) for approval of these drugs for
the indication of PTSD. Sertraline and paroxetine summary
data was extracted from documents found in the FDA drug
database, including the Review and Evaluation of Clinical
Data and the drug labels (17–20).
Here,
we
present
the
evidence
included
within
the
breakthrough therapy application showing that MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy was superior in phase 2 trials in terms of safety
and efficacy compared to the two approved SSRIs for treatment
of PTSD. The control groups in the MDMA trials also received
intensive psychotherapy (approximately 30 h), while SSRIs
pivotal trials used a placebo without any type of therapy for
comparison. Since the FDA does not regulate psychotherapy, the
BT application did not compare MDMA-assisted psychotherapy
to trauma-focused therapies. However, since trauma-focused
therapies have evidence for the greatest effectiveness in reducing
PTSD symptoms, we have included an additional section in this
review comparing MDMA-assisted-psychotherapy with first-line
psychological therapies.
EFFICACY AND DURABILITY OF
RESPONSE: MDMA VS. SSRIS
MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy
MDMA is a ring-substituted phenethylamine that is classied
as an entactogen in the Merck Index ( 21) due to its properties
that can promote empathy and compassion for self and others.
MDMA stimulates release of serotonin, norepinephrine and
dopamine, and may act directly on some adrenergic, cholinergic,
and serotonergic receptors ( 22). MDMA elevates levels of the
neurohormone oxytocin, an effect likely mediated through direct
or indirect action on 5HT1A, 5HT2A, and 5HT4 receptors (23–
25), as well as elevating levels of prolactin, arginine vasopressin
(AVP), adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), and cortisol
(26–29). MDMA possesses a unique pharmacodynamic profile in
humans that includes increased emotional empathy, an increase
in feelings of interpersonal closeness, greater prosocial behavior,
and an increased ability to tolerate distressing memories, greater
reward from pleasant memories, and less distress in response to
social exclusion ( 30–34). Imaging studies found that MDMA
reduced activity in brain areas associated with anxiety, including
the amygdala, and increased activity in prefrontal cortex (35–37).
Hypotheses for MDMAs therapeutic action include enhanced
fear extinction, memory reconsolidation, enhanced therapeutic
alliance, widening a window of tolerance for distressing thoughts
or experiences, and re-opening or enhancing a critical period
for experiencing social reward ( 25, 38, 39). It is likely through
these effects that MDMA augments and enhances effectiveness
of psychotherapy.
Investigators have developed standardized psychotherapeutic
methods for combining MDMA and psychotherapy that include
up to 3 sessions with MDMA and up to 12 non-drug sessions.
During preparatory sessions participants meet with the two
co-therapists, usually one male and one female, when they
discuss their goals, and concerns, and learn what to expect
during the MDMA-assisted session. The psychotherapy during
MDMA-assisted sessions is relatively non-directive, supporting
the
participants
spontaneous
experience,
and
designed
to
]-E',;
Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment
Feduccia et al.
3
September 2019 | Volume 10 | Article 650
Frontiers in Psychiatry | www.frontiersin.org
facilitate processing of challenging emotions in a safe and
controlled setting (40–44). Participants may use eye shades, and
may listen to a program of music designed to support the therapy.
Periods of inner focus alternate with periods of talking to the
therapists. Vital signs are assessed periodically. Material arising
during MDMA-assisted psychotherapy sessions is integrated in
subsequent psychotherapy visits. Subsequently, participants are
encouraged to make time to explore and express their unfolding
experience using journaling or artwork. Participants in Phase 2
studies were contacted for 7 days after each experimental session.
More information concerning MDMA-assisted psychotherapy
can be found in publications and in the MDMA Treatment
Manual (42). Studies with a long term follow up demonstrate
durable improvement in PTSD ( 41, 43–45), social anxiety in
autistic adults ( 46), and anxiety associated with facing a life
threatening illness (22, 38).
Phase 2 Trials of MDMA-Assisted
Psychotherapy for PTSD Treatment
The six Phase 2 studies of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy
that
supported
the
breakthrough
application
followed
a
randomized,
double-blind,
placebo-controlled
design
with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV
(CAPS-IV) as the primary efficacy measure ( 41, 44, 45,
47, 48). The CAPS-IV is an established measure of PTSD
symptoms (49, 50). To enroll, participants were required to
have a CAPS-IV total severity score of 50 or greater and to
have failed to respond to or tolerate at least one course of
treatment. The average duration of PTSD was 17.9 years.
The basic study design for the six studies included three
preparatory psychotherapy sessions, followed by 2–3 blinded,
8-h experimental psychotherapy sessions with MDMA (75–
125 mg) or comparator/placebo (0–40 mg MDMA), and three
90-min non-drug integrative psychotherapy visits following
each
experimental
session.
Experimental
sessions
were
scheduled approximately a month apart. Independent Raters
(not present during treatment, blinded to group assignment)
administered CAPS-IV at baseline, primary endpoint (3–8
weeks after two blinded sessions, or after three sessions in
one study), and secondary endpoints (time points during the
open-label crossover and at the 12-month follow-up).
Data was pooled across the six phase 2 studies (
Table 1
).
Results showed that the active dose group (MDMA 75–125 mg,
n = 72) was statistically superior to the control group (0–40 mg,
n = 31) at the primary endpoint (independent samples t-test,
p!<!0.001), with average (SD) drop in CAPS-IV total scores 37.8
(29.29) for the active group and 11.6 (17.93) for the control
group. There was large between-group Cohen’s
d
effect size (0.9).
Prior to enrollment in MAPS-sponsored Phase 2 trials, 17
and 35 subjects (of n = 105) had previously taken paroxetine and
sertraline, respectively (
Table 2
). Twelve participants had tried
both SSRIs. These individuals did not reach adequate symptom
reduction or failed to tolerate the SSRIs. From this subset,
20/38 (52.6%) subjects that received active doses of MDMA
(75–125! mg) no longer met criteria for PTSD at the primary
endpoint. The average drop in CAPS-IV total scores was 40.1
(25.66) for participants who had previously taken paroxetine and
35.04 (27.5) in participants who had previously taken sertraline
(
Table 2
). The other 14 subjects were randomized to the control
group. The high response rate and large drops in CAPS-IV total
score in this subset suggests that MDMA therapy may be able
to effectively treat PTSD in individuals who do not adequately
respond to SSRIs.
Sertraline Phase 3 Trials for PTSD
Sertraline was investigated by Pzer for treatment of PTSD in
four studies of similar design with a 12-week flexible dose (50,
100, 150, and 200 mg with 25 mg starting dose for titration)
(17, 20). Subjects who met DSM-III-R criteria with a CAPS-2
total score of 50 or greater were enrolled. Patients had a mean
duration of PTSD for 12 years and 44% of patients also had a
depressive disorder. Two of the four studies failed to find a
signicant difference between the sertraline and placebo treated
groups on any of the primary efficacy outcomes. One study
(640, n = 208) reported efficacy on CAPS-2 total score at week
12 [last observation carried forward (LOCF) method, p = 0.043]
but not week 12 [observed case (OC)] or any earlier weeks.
Placebo-subtracted effect size was 0.31, with a 6.8 point mean
difference between groups in CAPS-2 total score (LOCF). The
other study (671, n = 183) detected efficacy (OC) of sertraline at
weeks 2 (p!=!0.041), 4 (p = 0.0002), 6 (p = 0.011), 8 (p = 0.006),
TABLE 2 |
Mean change from baseline to the primary endpoint in CAPS-IV
total scores in MAPS-sponsored phase 2 subjects who had previously taken
sertraline, paroxetine, or both.
Paroxetine
n = 17
Sertraline
n = 35
Paroxetine/
sertraline
n = 12
Control group, mean
(SD)
(MDMA 040 mg)
21.0 (24.01)
n = 4
15.9 (16.87)
n = 10
30.3 (18.50)
n = 3
Active group
(MDMA 75125 mg)
40.1 (25.66)
n = 13
35.04 (27.5)
n = 25
38.2
(29.90)
n = 9
TABLE 1 |
Pooled CAPS-IV data from six phase 2 MAPS-sponsored studies of
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy.
Active group
(MDMA 75125 mg)
N = 72
Control group
(MDMA 040 mg)
N = 31
Change in CAPS-IV total scores a,
mean (SD)
37.8 (29.29)
11.6 (17.93)
Cohen’s
d
effect sizeb
1.5
0.6
Dropouts, n (%)c
5 of 74 (6.8%)
3 of 31 (9.7%)
aChange in CAPS-IV scores from baseline to the primary endpoint (1–2 months post
23 MDMA sessions).
bWithin-group Cohen’s d effect size calculated by dividing the change from baseline to
primary endpoint by the standard deviation.
cFor the active group, 3 terminated early but completed an endpoint assessment and
2 terminated early with no endpoint assessments. For the control group, 3 terminated
early but completed an endpoint assessment.
]-E',L
Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment
Feduccia et al.
4
September 2019 | Volume 10 | Article 650
Frontiers in Psychiatry | www.frontiersin.org
10 (p!=!0.04), and 12 (p = 0.016) on CAPS-2 but only in females
which was influenced by mood improvement.
A combined analysis of the two positive studies found a
signicant difference between sertraline and placebo groups only
in women but not in men. Results suggest much of the effect
on PTSD scales correlated with improvement in the HAM-D,
therefore it is unclear whether sertraline treats PTSD or comorbid
depression, an indication the drug was already approved for. The
report stated that there was insufficient evidence to support any
efficacy claim beyond 3 weeks of treatment. However, a longer-
term study that randomized responders (n = 96) in a 24-week
open-label continuation trial of sertraline (50–200 mg/day), or
switched to placebo for 28 weeks, found signicantly reduced
relapse rates for the sertraline group, in both males and females.
Paroxetine Phase 3 Trials for PTSD
Paroxetine
(20–50
mg/day)
demonstrated
superiority
over
placebo on change from baseline for the CAPS-2 total score
in two multicenter, placebo-controlled studies in adults who
met DSM-IV criteria for PTSD. The trials were sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline ( 18, 51). In these studies, 858 patients had
PTSD symptoms with duration on average of 13 years. Major
depressive disorder was present in 41% of patients and non-
PTSD anxiety disorder was reported for 40% of patients. Primary
outcomes were change from baseline to endpoint on CAPS-2
total score and the proportion of responders assessed by the
Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement Scale (CGI-I),
a 3-item observer-rated scale.
In Study 1 (20 and 40 mg) and Study 2 (20 and 50 mg),
paroxetine
was
signicantly
superior
to
placebo
on
both
outcome measures. In Study 1 (n = 551), paroxetine was better
than placebo (p < 0.001) at 4, 8, and 12-week time points for
the LOCF and OC analyses. 71% of 40 mg paroxetine and 76%
of 20 mg paroxetine treated patients met response criteria on
CGI-I compared to 48% of placebo (p < 0.001). The difference
between paroxetine and placebo groups on CAPS-2 total score
was approximately 14 units for LOCF and OC analyses for both
dose groups. In Study 2 (n = 307), paroxetine was better than
placebo (p < 0.001) at 12-week time point for the LOCF and OC
analyses. 76% of paroxetine treated patients met response criteria
on CGI-I compared to 50% of placebo (p < 0.001). The difference
between paroxetine and placebo groups on CAPS-2 total score
was approximately 11 units for LOCF and 14 units for OC.
A third study with flexible doses (20–50 mg) found paroxetine
to be signicantly better than placebo on CAPS-2 total score,
but not on CGI-I responders (dened as patients having a
score of! 1 “very much improved” or 2 “much improved”). In
Study 3 (n!=!322), CAPS-2 total score was statically superior in
paroxetine group compared to placebo for LOCF (p = 0.047) but
not OC analysis (p = 0.071) at the 12-week time point. On the
CGI-I, 60% of paroxetine treated subjects met response criteria
compared to 52% of placebo (not statistically signicant). The
difference between paroxetine and placebo groups on CAPS-2
total score was approximately 6 units for LOCF and OC
analysis. Analyses did not detect any differences in gender on
treatment!outcomes.
The difference in CAPS-2 total scores between paroxetine and
placebo in mean change from baseline at 12 weeks was roughly
6-14 units across the three studies. According to the drug label,
the efficacy of paroxetine to treat PTSD beyond 12 weeks had
not been investigated in controlled clinical trials, yet PTSD is a
chronic condition.
Comparison: SSRIs vs. MDMA
Primary efficacy evaluation of six MAPS-sponsored phase 2!trials
on change from Baseline to Primary Endpoint in CAPS-IV
Total Severity indicated a signicant effect of MDMA over the
comparator group (p < 0.001), with a large between-group effect
size (0.9 Cohen’s
d
effect size) that was approximately double that
of paroxetine (0.45–0.56) and triple that of sertraline (0.31–0.37).
In comparison of mean change in CAPS total scores, placebo
subtracted scores for sertraline ranged from 6.8–9.8 units, for
paroxetine 6–14 units, and for MDMA 26.2 units (
Table 3
).
The fact that the control group in MDMA studies received the
same intensive psychotherapy as the active dose group adds to
the clinical signicance of these differences. Results from MAPS-
sponsored MP-1 study detected signicant (p = 0.013) difference
between MDMA (125 mg) and placebo groups on CAPS-IV total
scores 3–5 days after therst experimental session, demonstrating
a rapid clinical response after a single MDMA dose. SSRIs require
at least 2 weeks of daily dosing with dose titrations to produce
any detectable PTSD symptom improvements, and one pivotal
TABLE 3 |
Comparison of sertraline, paroxetine, and MDMA mean CAPS reduction LOCF, intent-to-treat.
Sertraline
Paroxetine
MDMA
CAPS-2 (sertraline
placebo)a
Dropout %
CAPS-2 (paroxetine
placebo)a
Dropout %
CAPS-IV (MDMA–
control)b
Dropout %
Study 1
6.8
(effect size 0.31)
29.3%
14
(effect size 0.56)
35.5%
26.2
(effect size 0.9)
7.6%
Study 2
9.8
(effect size 0.37)
28.4%
11
(effect size 0.45)
39.0%
Study 3
6
(effect size 0.09)
33.0%
aEffect sizes were not reported in FDA statistical package for paroxetine. Placebo subtracted effect. Size were determined from CAPS scores by calculating the change from baseline
divided by the standard deviation.
bPrimary endpoint was 1–2 months after 2–3 blinded experimental sessions.
4$#'"-#)"',5'.$'6 !"#$%&'
Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment: Safety and Efficacy of MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy Compared to Parox
>.'".$'6
0#-#R
?C22'8#R
?$#-#$C8R
5'D'"'8%'R,GJaH
MC68&C-S
0B-"'
\C"'
Recommend
Recommend this work
Follow
Get updates
Share
Share in a message
[C2' 6b)'R#$C8R 7C/R
!SS,8'6
0'-"%B,DC","'R'-"%B`,^C)"8-&R`,1'C1&'`,'#%O
8 2 8
... Los psicodélicos serotoninérgicos clásicos son la psilocibina, el LSD, la DMT o la mescalina; la MDMA y la ketamina son sustancias con efectos similares. La investigación sobre la psilocibina en particular ha demostrado su considerable potencial para tratar una amplia variedad de problemas de salud mental, especialmente la ansiedad y la depresión, incluida la angustia existencial en pacientes de cuidados paliativos, y para tratar la dependencia de sustancias, incluida la adicción al alcohol y al tabaco. 1 La MDMA es una herramienta muy eficaz para tratar el trastorno de estrés postraumático (Mitchell et al., 2021). La investigación clínica sobre psicodélicos está experimentando un auge mundial, con 450 ensayos clínicos registrados hasta febrero de 2023 que investigan los efectos terapéuticos de los psicodélicos en una serie de indicaciones que incluyen la depresión, la ansiedad o el trastorno de estrés postraumático, así como los trastornos bipolares, obsesivo-compulsivos o alimentarios; los estudios también incluyen el tratamiento con psicodélicos de las adicciones al alcohol, el tabaco y otras drogas (como la metanfetamina o la cocaína), la obesidad, las migrañas, la epilepsia, la enfermedad de Alzheimer o de Parkinson, etc. (World Drug Report, 2023). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This article critically reflects on the current psychedelic renaissance from a decolonial perspective, with the aim of examining how ancestral Indigenous knowledge and practices are positioned within contemporary scientific, therapeutic, and cultural frameworks. The central objective is to interrogate the epistemic asymmetries and colonial continuities embedded in the global resurgence of interest in psychoactive substances such as psilocybin and ayahuasca. Methodologically, the article employs a reflexive analysis of interdisciplinary scholarly literature—drawing from decolonial theory, Indigenous studies, anthropology, and psychedelic science—to assess the ways in which Indigenous cosmovisions and healing traditions are being appropriated, commodified, and marginalized. The analysis is grounded in the theoretical frameworks of Epistemologies of the South, interculturality, and epistemic justice, and supported by case studies of the Mazatec and Amazonian peoples. It identifies key challenges posed by the medicalization and commercialization of sacred medicines, including testimonial and hermeneutical injustices, the dominance of Eurocentric epistemologies, and the exclusion of Indigenous actors from benefit-sharing and political participation. At the same time, the article highlights emerging initiatives advocating for reciprocal and ethical collaborations. The findings emphasize the urgent need for an epistemologically pluralist and ethically grounded paradigm shift in psychedelic research and practice—one that centers Indigenous sovereignty, promotes intercultural dialogue, and restores the spiritual, cultural, and territorial dimensions of ancestral medicines. The article concludes that a truly decolonial approach to the psychedelic renaissance must involve not only recognition but also structural transformation towards justice, autonomy, and mutual respect.
... This constellation of potential mental health benefits appears to closely resemble the one reported for psychedelics (e.g. [1][2][3][4][5]. Consistent with this, the subjective experiences arising acutely during circular breathwork have been tentatively aligned with those produced by psychedelic interventions-both anecdotally and in a small number of explorative studies 8 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Altered states of consciousness (ASCs), induced e.g. during psychedelic-assisted therapy, show potential to treat prevalent mental health disorders like depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. However, access to such treatments is restricted by legal, medical, and financial barriers. Circular breathwork may present a non-pharmacological and hence more accessible alternative to engage similar therapeutic processes. Scientific studies of breathwork are only just emerging and its physiological and psychological mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we track physiological and experiential dynamics throughout a breathwork session, comparing two forms of breathwork: Holotropic and Conscious-Connected breathwork. We show that a reduction in end-tidal CO 2 pressure due to deliberate hyperventilation is significantly correlated to ASC onset ( r = -0.46; p < 0.001). Based on standard questionnaires (MEQ-30 and 11-DASC), the ASCs evoked by breathwork resembled those produced by psychedelics across several experiential domains such as ego dissolution, and their depth predicted psychological and physiological follow-on effects, including improved well-being and reduced depressive symptoms. Further analysis showed that different breathwork approaches produced highly similar outcomes. Our findings identify physiological boundary conditions for ASCs to arise in a non-pharmacological context, shedding light on the functional mechanisms of breathwork as well as its potential as a psychotherapeutic tool.
... Music mindfulness can also play an important role in psychedelicassisted therapy, which has re-emerged as a promising therapeutic modality for stress-related disorders such as PTSD, anxiety, and depression (Mitchell et al., 2023;Carhart-Harris et al., 2021;Gukasyan et al., 2022;Griffiths et al., 2016;Grob et al., 2011). Music is already an important facilitative tool during psychedelic dosing sessions (Adamska and Finc, 2023;Kaelen et al., 2015;Kaelen et al., 2018;Barrett et al., 2017;Bonny and Pahnke, 1972) and can support meaning-making, emotionality, and mental imagery after psychedelic administration (Barrett et al., 2017;Kaelen et al., 2018;Barrett et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Anxiety and depression reduce autonomic system activity, as measured by Heart Rate Variability (HRV), and exacerbate cardiac morbidity. Both music and mindfulness have been shown to increase HRV, and clinical approaches incorporating these interventions show promise as effective treatments for symptoms of anxiety and depression. Music mindfulness, which combines music listening with mindfulness activities, may provide unique and synergistic therapeutic benefits for stress management. However, to date, no studies have evaluated the physiological mechanisms underlying a community-based music mindfulness paradigm. Methods We used wearable technology to record electrocardiography and electroencephalography signals from participants with moderate symptoms of anxiety and depression during a community-based music mindfulness paradigm. We also assessed the impact of our music mindfulness session on participant’s psychological state. Results and discussion We found that music mindfulness sessions acutely enhanced multiple measures of HRV and altered EEG power spectral density across various frequency bands in frontotemporal electrodes. Both live and virtual music mindfulness sessions also acutely reduced stress and altered participants’ state of consciousness; however, only live sessions fostered social connection. Additionally, the physiological and psychological effects of music mindfulness varied based on participants’ self-reported sex. Overall, our findings demonstrate that music mindfulness effectively engages autonomic and frontotemporal neural mechanisms, which may contribute to the treatment of anxiety and depression symptoms.
Article
Psychiatric disorders are a major cause of illness in the world. Unfortunately, many patients are resistant to treatment and present serious complications. Schizophrenia is refractory to treatment in about one-third of patients. Antidepressants are effective in about half of patients. Suicidal ideation is an increasing issue in patients with mixed features in bipolar disorder (BD). Therefore, there is a need to develop and test new drugs or new indications of available medications for the treatment of psychiatric disorders through evidence-based investigations. This narrative review aims to present the molecules approved by the main drug agencies, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), from 2018 to date, along with new indications and new formulations of existing medications. We searched PubMed for new drugs approved for schizophrenia, BD, major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We evaluated their clinical benefits, safety, and tolerability profiles. Finally, we considered studies on the main molecules that have shown initial evidence of efficacy and are in the process of obtaining approval. Our search suggested that a new antipsychotic, lumateperone, and two drug combinations, olanzapine/samidorphan (OLZ/SAM) and xanomeline/trospium (KarXT), were approved for schizophrenia. In addition, some new methods of administration—monthly risperidone administration, subcutaneous risperidone administration, and transdermal asenapine administration—obtained approval from the main drug agencies. Lumateperone and OLZ/SAM were also approved in BD. Esketamine, a compound that modulates glutamatergic transmission, was approved to treat treatment-resistant depression and acute suicidal ideation. The dextromethorphan/bupropion combination was approved for MDD. Two new agents, brexanolone and zuranolone, were approved for treatment of postpartum depression. On the other hand, no new drugs received approval for anxiety disorders or OCD. In summary, some new psychotropic medications have been developed, in particular with the aim to improve the symptoms of resistant patients and to decrease the incidence of adverse effects. It is necessary to continue testing the effectiveness of new compounds in methodologically rigorous studies.
Article
Full-text available
Background and aims Psychedelic and MDMA-assisted psychotherapy are at the forefront of new treatment models for mental illnesses such as PTSD and depression, as well as improving well-being. Mindfulness meditation and loving-kindness meditation have also gained research traction, showing promise for enhancing emotional regulation and psychological well-being. This paper explores the therapeutic convergence of these modalities, highlighting their neurobiological, psychological, and phenomenological overlap, and suggesting potential bidirectional synergy as a foundation for psychedelic or MDMA-assisted therapy. Methods A narrative and theoretical review of the current literature was conducted, examining the neurobiological, psychological, and phenomenological effects of MDMA, psychedelics, and meditation. Studies focusing on their potential synergy and mechanisms of action were prioritized and used as a backing for a theoretical framework. Results Psychedelics may improve psychological flexibility, prosocial behaviors, empathy, and neuroplasticity. Meditation research suggests similar benefits, including enhanced decentering capacity, emotional regulation, and well-being. Both modalities influence overlapping neural circuitry, particularly the amygdala, hippocampus, and default mode network. Integrating meditation with MDMA or psychedelic-assisted therapy may stabilize insights gained during altered states of consciousness, promote sustained therapeutic benefits, and minimize distress during therapy. Conclusions The convergence of meditation and psychedelics or MDMA-assisted therapy is a novel and promising approach for enhancing mental health treatments. Future research should investigate structured protocols combining these modalities, focusing on optimizing “set and setting” and long-term integration practices.
Article
Full-text available
The recent review of a new drug application for MDMA‐assisted therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder by the United States' Food and Drug Administration (FDA) highlighted epistemological and methodological challenges for evidence assessments. Similar challenges will also be faced in reviews of other compounds in early‐ and late‐stage development, like psilocybin for depression. The regulatory demand for two successful phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) seems problematic, given a current lack of agreement on what constitutes “success”, particularly when psychoactive drug administration is concomitant with (psycho)therapy. These complex arrangements challenge the internal validity of estimated average treatment effect through comparison with conventional control conditions. This paper reviews the assumptions behind RCTs' current “gold‐standard” status in the hierarchy of evidence‐based medicine (EBM). Recapitulating known epistemic limits of randomization and blinding, it emphasizes the urgent need to avoid the extrapolation fallacy. The resulting argument is that the degree of trustworthiness that efficacy—reported in RCTs—will reliably predict effectiveness—in target populations outside RCTs—depends on what type of psychedelic treatments will be regulated. If “stand‐alone” drugs for large‐scale prescription and consumption, trustworthiness should be graded low. On the other hand, for regulation of drug‐assisted (psycho) therapies, the degree of trustworthiness can be considered high. The reason being that these two treatment approaches are based on different causal claims with distinct external validities. Therefore, careful assessment of support factors in each is recommended to prevent detrimental consequences, from potential rejection of effective therapies up to medical reversal of eventually approved drugs.
Article
Full-text available
Psychedelic treatments like MDMA can sometimes have side effects which persist despite management with Western medical approaches. In what follows, we present a case study of an individual who suffered from insomnia, anxiety, tinnitus, and more for months following MDMA therapy. Ultimately, her symptoms responded to management within the Traditional Chinese Medicine framework. We present this case in detail, and argue that psychedelic management, especially in the integration phase, can benefit from the incorporation of techniques which engage with energies that Western medicine do not address.
Thesis
This study investigated the lived experience of an adaptive resolution, a key experiential feature in EMDR therapy, as both a process and outcome, from the perspectives of adult clients in an outpatient mental health setting in the United States. It aimed to lift the voices of clients to provide a well-rounded evidence base for EMDR therapy, and to provide clarity of the processes and features which shape the unfolding of adaptive resolution, which can lead to improvements in research and practice. Giorgi’s descriptive phenomenological method was used to analyze interview data from eight participants and the results were used to answer the research questions about the nature and extent of the change, how the experience impacts the clinical issues a client seeks treatment for, and to greater understand how trauma resolution is determined. The results of this analysis revealed a phenomenological structure of an adaptive resolution as a change process consisting of movement from constriction to expansion, by a process of descent and re-emergence. Essential constituents of the process are identified along with the various pathways that participants took to resolve trauma. Significant findings included transpersonal experiences as a way of resolving trauma, a first finding in the EMDR therapy’s qualitative research studies from the perspectives of clients. Additionally, growth beyond the cessation of symptoms as an outcome of adaptive resolution was found, including spiritual and transpersonal, which has had little mention in current EMDR therapy’s qualitative research studies from the perspectives of clients. All findings are discussed for their application to research and practice, and frameworks from the field of transpersonal psychology are provided to help understand the transpersonal data that emerged from this study and how it may be used to expand theory and practice.
Article
Full-text available
Background Chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a disabling condition that generates considerable morbidity, mortality, and both medical and indirect social costs. Treatment options are limited. A novel therapy using 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has shown efficacy in six phase 2 trials. Its cost-effectiveness is unknown. Methods and findings To assess the cost-effectiveness of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy (MAP) from the health care payer’s perspective, we constructed a decision-analytic Markov model to portray the costs and health benefits of treating patients with chronic, severe, or extreme, treatment-resistant PTSD with MAP. In six double-blind phase 2 trials, MAP consisted of a mean of 2.5 90-minute trauma-focused psychotherapy sessions before two 8-hour sessions with MDMA (mean dose of 125 mg), followed by a mean of 3.5 integration sessions for each active session. The control group received an inactive placebo or 25–40 mg. of MDMA, and otherwise followed the same regimen. Our model calculates net medical costs, mortality, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Efficacy was based on the pooled results of six randomized controlled phase 2 trials with 105 subjects; and a four-year follow-up of 19 subjects. Other inputs were based on published literature and on assumptions when data were unavailable. We modeled results over a 30-year analytic horizon and conducted extensive sensitivity analyses. Our model calculates expected medical costs, mortality, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Future costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% per year. For 1,000 individuals, MAP generates discounted net savings of 103.2millionover30yearswhileaccruing5,553discountedQALYs,comparedtocontinuedstandardofcare.MAPbreaksevenoncostat3.1yearswhiledelivering918QALYs.Makingtheconservativeassumptionthatbenefitsceaseafteroneyear,MAPwouldaccruenetcostsof103.2 million over 30 years while accruing 5,553 discounted QALYs, compared to continued standard of care. MAP breaks even on cost at 3.1 years while delivering 918 QALYs. Making the conservative assumption that benefits cease after one year, MAP would accrue net costs of 7.6 million while generating 288 QALYS, or $26,427 per QALY gained. Conclusion MAP provided to patients with severe or extreme, chronic PTSD appears to be cost-saving while delivering substantial clinical benefit. Third-party payers are likely to save money within three years by covering this form of therapy.
Article
Full-text available
Rationale MDMA-assisted psychotherapy is under investigation as a novel treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The primary mechanism of action of MDMA involves the same reuptake transporters targeted by antidepressant medications commonly prescribed for PTSD. Objectives Data were pooled from four phase 2 trials of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy. To explore the effect of tapering antidepressant medications, participants who had been randomized to receive active doses of MDMA (75–125 mg) were divided into two groups (taper group (n = 16) or non-taper group (n = 34)). Methods Between-group comparisons were made for PTSD and depression symptom severity at the baseline and the primary endpoint, and for peak vital signs across two MDMA sessions. Results Demographics, baseline PTSD, and depression severity were similar between the taper and non-taper groups. At the primary endpoint, the non-taper group (mean = 45.7, SD = 27.17) had a significantly (p = 0.009) lower CAPS-IV total scores compared to the taper group (mean = 70.3, SD = 33.60). More participants in the non-taper group (63.6%) no longer met PTSD criteria at the primary endpoint than those in the taper group (25.0%). The non-taper group (mean = 12.7, SD = 10.17) had lower depression symptom severity scores (p = 0.010) compared to the taper group (mean = 22.6, SD = 16.69). There were significant differences between groups in peak systolic blood pressure (p = 0.043) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.032). Conclusions Recent exposure to antidepressant drugs that target reuptake transporters may reduce treatment response to MDMA-assisted psychotherapy.
Article
Full-text available
Unsuccessfully treated posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a serious and life-threatening disorder. Two medications, paroxetine hydrochloride and sertraline hydrochloride, are approved treatments for PTSD by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Analyses of pharmacotherapies for PTSD found only small to moderate effects when compared with placebo. The Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) obtained Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) from the FDA for 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of PTSD on the basis of pooled analyses showing a large effect size for this treatment. This review covers data supporting BTD. In this treatment, MDMA is administered with psychotherapy in up to three monthly 8-h sessions. Participants are prepared for these sessions beforehand, and process material arising from the sessions in follow-up integrative psychotherapy sessions. Comparing data used for the approval of paroxetine and sertraline and pooled data from Phase 2 studies, MAPS demonstrated that MDMA-assisted psychotherapy constitutes a substantial improvement over available pharmacotherapies in terms of safety and efficacy. Studies of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy had lower dropout rates compared to sertraline and paroxetine trials. As MDMA is only administered under direct observation during a limited number of sessions, there is little chance of diversion, accidental or intentional overdose, or withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuation. BTD status has expedited the development of MAPS phase 3 trials occurring worldwide, leading up to a planned submission seeking FDA approval in 2021. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers NCT00090064, NCT00353938, NCT01958593, NCT01211405, NCT01689740, NCT01793610.
Article
Full-text available
Background Posttraumatic stress disorder is a prevalent mental health condition with substantial impact on daily functioning that lacks sufficient treatment options. Here we evaluate six phase 2 trials in a pooled analysis to determine the study design for phase 3 trials of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD. Methods Six randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials at five study sites were conducted from April 2004 to February 2017. Active doses of MDMA (75–125 mg, n = 72) or placebo/control doses (0–40 mg, n = 31) were administered to individuals with PTSD during manualized psychotherapy sessions in two or three 8-h sessions spaced a month apart. Three non-drug 90-min therapy sessions preceded the first MDMA exposure, and three to four followed each experimental session. Results After two blinded experimental sessions, the active group had significantly greater reductions in CAPS-IV total scores from baseline than the control group [MMRM estimated mean difference (SE) between groups − 22.0 (5.17), P < 0.001]. The between-group Cohen’s d effect size was 0.8, indicating a large treatment effect. After two experimental sessions, more participants in the active group (54.2%) did not meet CAPS-IV PTSD diagnostic criteria than the control group (22.6%). Depression symptom improvement on the BDI-II was greatest for the active group compared to the control group, although only trended towards significant group differences [MMRM, estimated mean difference (SE) between groups − 6.0 (3.03), P = 0.053]. All doses of MDMA were well tolerated, with some expected reactions occurring at greater frequency for the active MDMA group during experimental sessions and the 7 days following. Conclusions MDMA-assisted psychotherapy was efficacious and well tolerated in a large sample of adults with PTSD. These studies supported expansion into phase 3 trials and led to FDA granting Breakthrough Therapy designation for this promising treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00090064, NCT00353938, NCT01958593, NCT01211405, NCT01689740, NCT01793610.
Article
Full-text available
A critical period is a developmental epoch during which the nervous system is expressly sensitive to specific environmental stimuli that are required for proper circuit organization and learning. Mechanistic characterization of critical periods has revealed an important role for exuberant brain plasticity during early development, and for constraints that are imposed on these mechanisms as the brain matures¹. In disease states, closure of critical periods limits the ability of the brain to adapt even when optimal conditions are restored. Thus, identification of manipulations that reopen critical periods has been a priority for translational neuroscience². Here we provide evidence that developmental regulation of oxytocin-mediated synaptic plasticity (long-term depression) in the nucleus accumbens establishes a critical period for social reward learning. Furthermore, we show that a single dose of (+/−)-3,4-methylendioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) reopens the critical period for social reward learning and leads to a metaplastic upregulation of oxytocin-dependent long-term depression. MDMA-induced reopening of this critical period requires activation of oxytocin receptors in the nucleus accumbens, and is recapitulated by stimulation of oxytocin terminals in the nucleus accumbens. These findings have important implications for understanding the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental diseases that are characterized by social impairments and of disorders that respond to social influence or are the result of social injury³.
Article
Full-text available
Genetic variation in serotonin transporter (SERT) that reduces transcriptional efficiency is associated with higher anxiety and fear traits and a greater incidence of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although previous studies have shown that rats with no expression of SERT (SERT−/−) have increased baseline anxiety behaviors, SERT+/− rats with low SERT expression (and more relevant to the clinical condition with low SERT expression) do not. Yet, no systematic studies of fear acquisition/extinction or their underlying neural mechanisms have been conducted in this preclinical genetic SERT+/− model. Here we sought to determine if SERT+/− or SERT−/−, compared to wildtype, rats would show exacerbated panic responses and/or persistent conditioned fear responses that may be associated with PTSD or phobia vulnerability. Results: Only SERT−/− rats showed increased baseline anxiety-like behaviors with heightened panic respiratory responses. However SERT+/− (also SERT-/-) rats showed enhanced acquisition of fear and delayed extinction of fear that was associated with changes in serotonergic-related genes (e.g., reduced 5-HT1A receptor) and disrupted inhibition within the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Furthermore, the disrupted fear responses in SERT+/− rats were normalized with 5HT1A antagonist infusions into the BLA. Enhanced acquisition and failure to extinguish fear memories displayed by both SERT−/− and SERT+/− rats are cardinal symptoms of disabling anxiety disorders such as phobias and PTSD. The data here support the hypothesis that reduced SERT function is a genetic risk that disrupts select gene expression and network properties in the amygdala that could result in vulnerability to these syndromes.
Article
Full-text available
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic, often debilitating mental health disorder that may develop after a traumatic life event. Fortunately, effective psychological treatments for PTSD exist. In 2017, the Veterans Health Administration and Department of Defense (VA/DoD) and the American Psychological Association (APA) each published treatment guidelines for PTSD, which are a set of recommendations for providers who treat individuals with PTSD. The purpose of the current review article is to briefly review the methodology used in each set of 2017 guidelines and then discuss the psychological treatments of PTSD for adults that were strongly recommended by both sets of guidelines. Both guidelines strongly recommended use of Prolonged Exposure (PE), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) and trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Each of these treatments has a large evidence base and is trauma-focused, which means they directly address memories of the traumatic event or thoughts and feelings related to the traumatic event. Finally, we will discuss implications and future directions.
Article
Full-text available
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is an extensively validated and widely used structured diagnostic interview for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The CAPS was recently revised to correspond with PTSD criteria in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). This article describes the development of the CAPS for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and presents the results of an initial psychometric evaluation of CAPS-5 scores in 2 samples of military veterans (Ns = 165 and 207). CAPS-5 diagnosis demonstrated strong interrater reliability (к = .78 to 1.00, depending on the scoring rule) and test-retest reliability (к = .83), as well as strong correspondence with a diagnosis based on the CAPS for DSM-IV (CAPS-IV; к = .84 when optimally calibrated). CAPS-5 total severity score demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .88) and interrater reliability (ICC = .91) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = .78). It also demonstrated good convergent validity with total severity score on the CAPS-IV (r = .83) and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (r = .66) and good discriminant validity with measures of anxiety, depression, somatization, functional impairment, psychopathy, and alcohol abuse (rs = .02 to .54). Overall, these results indicate that the CAPS-5 is a psychometrically sound measure of DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis and symptom severity. Importantly, the CAPS-5 strongly corresponds with the CAPS-IV, which suggests that backward compatibility with the CAPS-IV was maintained and that the CAPS-5 provides continuity in evidence-based assessment of PTSD in the transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 criteria. (PsycINFO Database Record
Article
Returning veterans often face multiple concurrent psychiatric and behavioral conditions that negatively impact reintegration into civilian life and are associated with functional disability. Understanding how conditions interact to negatively impact functioning is an important step toward developing holistic treatment approaches optimized for this population. This study utilized a cross‐sectional and prospective longitudinal cohort design, applying regression algorithms to understand the relative contribution of common clinical issues to functional disability in U.S. veterans who served after the September 11, 2001 (9/11), terror attacks. Community‐dwelling post‐9/11 veterans (N = 397) completed detailed assessments, including common clinical condition diagnoses, combat experience, and demographics, which were used to predict functional disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule); 205 participants were reassessed approximately 1–2 years after enrollment. Regression analyses showed a strong association between the predictor variables and functional disability, f 2 = 1.488. Validation analyses showed a high prediction ability of functional disability to independent samples, r = .719, and across time in the same individuals, r = .780. The strongest predictors included current posttraumatic stress disorder, depressive disorder, sleep disturbance, and pain diagnoses. These results demonstrate the importance of considering multiple common co‐occurring conditions when assessing functional disability in post‐9/11 veterans and suggest that certain syndromes contribute the most unique information to predicting functional disability with high confidence. As most U.S. veterans utilize private healthcare systems, these results have clinical utility for both Veterans Affairs and civilian healthcare practitioners in assessing and monitoring functional disability in post‐9/11 veterans over time.