In 2008, the Ministry of Environmental Protec-tion (MEP) in co-operation with Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) initiated work on a comprehensive new edition of the Red List of the Chinese flora. The project, named China Biodiversity Red List—Higher Plants, extended to 2013. We assessed the threatened status of all known species of higher plants in China to produce the Red List of China Higher Plants (RLCHP). In September 2013, the RLCHP was officially released in the form of a joint announcement by MEP and CAS (http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/ 201309/t20130912_260061.htm/).
In the present paper, we report on the revised 2013 Red List through the use of new literature and data (Dong et al, 2017; He & Jia, 2017; Qin et al, 2017; Yang et al, 2017). Due to space limitations, we list only 3,879 threatened species, i.e. species categorized as Critically Endagnered (CR), Endangered (EN) and Vulnerable (VU). The data include the scientific name of each species, the Chinese name, endemism, red list category and criterion for assigning the designation.
We invited more than 300 experts to contribute survival information of species and/or to review the assessments. The RLCHP covers 35,784 species, in-cluding 30,068 species of angiosperms, 251 species of gymnosperms, 2,244 species of lycophytes and ferns, and 3,221 species of bryophytes. This is the first Red List that covers the entire Chinese flora, and the number of experts involved and data used are much more than in previous analyses.
Two documents were used as a standard in this assessment: IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Version 3.1, Second edition) (IUCN, 2012a) and Guideline for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels (Version 4.0) (IUCN, 2012b). Nine IUCN Red List categories were applied to the RLCHP: Extinct (EX), Extinct in the Wild (EW), Regionally Extinct (RE), Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN), Vulnerable (VU), Near Threatened (NT), Least Concern (LC), and Data Deficient (DD).
Four steps were applied in the assessment: setting up a baseline checklist, collecting data, species as-sessment and review. For instance, during the review of the angiosperms assessments, eight expert meetings were held in six cities (Guangzhou, Guilin, Kunming, Wuhan, Nanjing and Beijing), and 87 experts took part in one-on-one interviews with staff members of the program. To guarantee professional results of the as-sessment, we invited 19 leading experts from institu-tions of CAS and universities to join the red list steering committee. The committee was responsible for examining and approving the assessment methodology, examining the annual report and reviewing the results of the assessments. Four steering committee meetings were held in Beijing between 2008 and 2012.
Of the 35,784 assessed species of China higher plants, 21 species are Extinct (EX), 9 species are Ex-tinct in the Wild (EW), 10 species are Regionally Ex-tinct (RE), 614 species are Critically Endangered (CR), 1,313 speices are Endangered (EN), 1,952 species are Vulnerable (VU), 2,818 species are Near Threatened (NT), 24,243 species are of Least Concern (LC), and 4,804 species are Data Deficient (DD). The results show that 3,879 species, representing 10.84% of the evaluated species, have been identified as threatened categories (CR, EN and VU).
The references cited in this paper can be found at the website http://www.biodiversity-science.net/fileup/ PDF/ 2017-144-1.pdf/.