References

Full text

133
References
Abdallah, C., Denis, J.-L., & Langley, A. (2011). Having your cake and eating it too:
Discourses of transcendence and their role in organizational change dynamics.
Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3): 333–348.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Metatheory: Lessons from social identity research.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2): 98–106.
Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 61–89.
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. Scandinavian
Journal of Management, 21(4): 429–449.
Alderfer, C. (2011). The practice of organizational diagnosis: Theory and methods.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Allen, V. L. (1975). Social analysis: A Marxist critique and alternative. New York,
NY: Longman.
Alvarez, S. A., Zander, U., Barney, J. B., & Afuah, A. (2020). Developing a theory
of the firm for the 21st century. Academy of Management Review, 45(4): 711–716.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problem-
atization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 247–271.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity‐based theory of organizations. Journal
of Management Studies, 49(7): 1194–1220.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control:
Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39: 619–644.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2012). Making sense of management: A critical intro-
duction. London, UK: Sage.
Ancona, D., Bresman, H., & Kaeufer, K. (2002). The comparative advantage of
X-teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3): 33–39.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and
organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization
Science, 20(4): 696–717.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes:
Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range
Planning, 43(1): 104–122.
Andrzejewski, A. V. (2008). Building power: Architecture and surveillance in
Victorian America. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Aoki, K. (2020). The roles of material artifacts in managing the learning-performance
paradox: The Kaizen case. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4): 1266–1299.
Appelrouth, S. (2005). Body and soul: Jazz in the 1920s. American Behavioral
Scientist, 48(11): 1496–1509.
Arendt, H. (1972). Crisis of the republic. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Argan, G. C. (1968). Storia dell’arte italiana. Vol. 2 Da Giotto a Leonardo. Sansoni.
Argyris, C. (1994). Good communication that blocks learning. Harvard Business
Review, 72(4): 77–85.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
134
Aroles, J., & McLean, C. (2016). Rethinking stability and change in the study of
organizational routines: Difference and repetition in a newspaper-printing factory.
Organization Science, 27(3): 535–550.
Ashby, M. N., Riad, S., & Davenport, S. (2019). Engaging with paradox, striving for
sustainability: Relating to public science and commercial research. Organization &
Environment, 32(3): 255–280.
Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47(7): 755–778.
Ashforth, B. E., & Reingen, P. H. (2014). Functions of dysfunction: Managing the
dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 59(3): 474–516.
Ashforth, B. E., Rogers, K. M., Pratt, M. G., & Pradies, C. (2014). Ambivalence in
organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science, 25(5): 1453–1478.
Azoulay, P., Repenning, N. P., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2010). Nasty, brutish, and short:
Embeddedness failure in the pharmaceutical industry. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 55(3): 472–507.
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motiva-
tional basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 34(10): 2045–2068.
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation.
Academy of Management Review, 14: 496–515.
Bachmann, C., Habisch, A., & Dierksmeier, C. (2018). Practical wisdom: Management’s
no longer forgotten virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1): 147–165.
Bahcall, S. (2019). Loonshots. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Baines, D. (2020). What 16,000 missing coronavirus cases tell us about how the UK is
handling the pandemic. The Conversation, 7 October 2020, https:// theconversation
.com/ what -16 -000 -missing -coronavirus -cases -tell -us -about -how -the -uk -is -handling
-the -pandemic -147539 (accessed 3 December 2020).
Baker, D. (2013). Service quality and customer satisfaction in the airline industry:
A comparison between legacy airlines and low-cost airlines. American Journal of
Tourism Research, 2(1): 67–77.
Ballesteros, A. (2020). Digitocracy: Ruling and being ruled. Philosophies, 5(2): 1–9.
Bansal, P., & Song, H.-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate
sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1):
105–149.
Bansal, P., Kim, A., & Wood, M. O. (2018). Hidden in plain sight: The importance of
scale in organizations’ attention to issues. Academy of Management Review, 43(2):
217–241.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how
matter comes to matter. Signs, 28: 801–831.
Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource‐based theory’s model of profit appropriation must
incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13):
3305–3325.
Barton, M. A., & Kahn, W. A. (2018). Group resilience: The place and meaning of
relational pauses. Organization Studies, 40(9): 1409–1429.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology,
psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Aylesbury, UK: Intertext.
Bateson, G., Jackson, D. D., Haley, J., & Weakland, J. H. (1956). Toward a theory of
schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 1(4): 251–264.
Battilana, J., Besharov, M., & Mitzinneck, B. (2017). On hybrids and hybrid organiz-
ing: A review and roadmap for future research. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 135
Lawrence, & R. Meyer (eds), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism
(2nd edn, pp. 133–169). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Beckett, S. (1958 [2009]). Three novels. Molloy. Malone dies. The unnamable. New
York, NY: Grove Press.
Bednarek, R., Chalkias, K., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2020). Managing risk as a duality
of harm and benefit: A study of organizational risk objects in the global insurance
industry. British Journal of Management. First published: 28 November 2019,
https:// doi .org/ 10 .1111/ 1467 -8551 .12389
Bednarek, R., Paroutis, S., & Sillince, J. (2017). Transcendence through rhetorical
practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organization Studies, 38(1):
77–101.
Bednarek, R., Cunha, M. P., Schad, J., & Smith, W. K. (eds) (2021). Both-anding
paradox theory. Research in the sociology of organizations, forthcoming.
Beech, N., Burns, H., de Caestecker, L., MacIntosh, R., & MacLean, D. (2004).
Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations,
57(10): 1313–1332.
Benders, J., & Van Veen, K. (2001). What’s in a fashion? Interpretative viability and
management fashions. Organization, 8(1): 33–53.
Bennis, W. G. (2000). Managing the dream: Reflections on leadership and change.
New York: Basic Books.
Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 22(1): 1–21.
Bentham, J. (2017a). Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, volume 1: 1752 to 1776.
Edited by Timothy L. S. Sprigge & J. H. Burns. London, UK: UCL Press.
Bentham, J. (2017b). Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, volume 4: October 1788 to
December 1793. Edited by A. T. Milne & J. R. Dinwiddy. London, UK: UCL Press.
Berg Johansen, C., & De Cock, C. (2018). Ideologies of time: How elite corporate
actors engage the future. Organization, 25(2): 186–204.
Berti, M. (2017). Elgar introduction to organizational discourse analysis. Cheltenham,
UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Berti, M. (2021). Logic(s) and paradox. Research in the sociology of organizations,
forthcoming.
Berti, M., & Simpson, A. V. (2019). The dark side of organizational paradoxes: The
dynamics of disempowerment. Academy of Management Review. Published online:
26 November 2019. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2017.0208.
Berti, M., & Simpson, A. V. (2020). On the practicality of resisting pragmatic par-
adoxes. Academy of Management Review. Published online: 24 July 2020. DOI:
10.5465/amr.2020.0258
Berti, M., Simpson, A. V., & Clegg, S. R. (2018). Making a place out of space:
The social imaginaries and realities of a Business School as a designed space.
Management Learning, 49(2): 168–186.
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations:
Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review,
39(3): 364–381.
Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and exten-
sion. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1): 5–14.
Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds, UK: Leeds Books.
Bion, W. R. (1946). The leaderless group project. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic,
10(3): 77–81.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
136
Blau, P. M. (1954). Co-operation and competition in a bureaucracy. American Journal
of Sociology, 59(6): 530–535.
Boje, D. M., & Dennehy, R. F. (1993). Managing in the postmodern world: America’s
revolution against exploitation. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory—the skeleton of science. Management
Science, 2(3): 197–208.
Braverman, H. (1975). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the
twentieth century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Brenkert, G. G. (2009). Google, human rights, and moral compromise. Journal of
Business Ethics, 85(4): 453–478.
Brooks, D. (2019, 18 June). Harvard’s false path to wisdom. The New York Times.
Brown, N. J. L., Sokal, A. D., & Friedman, H. L. (2014). The persistence of
wishful thinking: Response to “updated thinking on positivity ratios”. American
Psychologist, 69: 629–632.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking
complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 1–34.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as struc-
tured chaos. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in
organizations. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Brunsson, N. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy. Copenhagen: Copenhagen
Business School Press.
Bufford, R. K. (2006). Paradox. https:// digitalcommons .georgefox .edu/ gscp _fac/ 305
(accessed 1 December 2020).
Bussing, A., Bissels, T., Fuchs, V., & Perrar, K.-M. (1999). A dynamic model of work
satisfaction: Qualitative approaches. Human Relations, 52(8): 999–1028.
Byggeth, S., & Hochschorner, E. (2006). Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for
sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production,
14(15–16): 1420–1430.
Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in concep-
tions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5): 539–553.
Cameron, K. S. (2008). Paradox in positive organizational change. The Journal of
Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1): 7–24.
Cameron, K. S. (2011). Responsible leadership as virtuous leadership. Journal of
Business Ethics, 98(1): 25–35.
Cameron, K. S. (2017a). Cross-cultural research and positive organizational scholar-
ship. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(1): 13–32.
Cameron, K. S. (2017b). Paradox in positive organizational scholarship. In W. K.
Smith, M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski, et al. (eds), The Oxford handbook of organi-
zational paradox (pp. 216–238). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, K. S., & Lavine, M. (2006). Making the impossible possible: Leading extraor-
dinary performance: The Rocky Flats story. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory
of change in organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing
Company.
Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2012). The Oxford handbook of positive organiza-
tional scholarship. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J., & Quinn, R. E. (2003a). Positive organizational scholar-
ship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 137
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003b). Foundations of positive
organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (eds),
Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 3–13).
San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Cameron, K. S., Quinn, R. E., DeGraff, J., & Thakor, A. V. (2014). Competing values
leadership. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Campbell, P., Keohane, D., & Inagaki, K. (2019, 9 December). Staying together.
Financial Times, 17.
Camus, A. (1955). The myth of Sisyphus, and other essays. New York, NY: Alfred A.
Knopf.
Cappellaro, G., Compagni, A., & Vaara, E. (2021). Maintaining strategic ambiguity for
protection: Struggles over opacity, equivocality, and absurdity around the Sicilian
mafia. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1): 1–37.
Capra, F. (1975). The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern
physics and eastern mysticism. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.
Carlsen, A., & Sandelands, L. (2015). First passion: Wonder in organizational inquiry.
Management Learning, 46(4): 373–390.
Carlsen, A., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., & Mortensen, T. F. (2020). From ideas of power
to the powering of ideas in organizations: Reflections from Follett and Foucault.
European Management Journal, https:// doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .emj .2020 .03 .006
Carter, C., McKinlay, A., & Rowlinson, M. (2002). Introduction: Foucault, manage-
ment and history. Organization, 9(4): 515–526.
Cassidy, J. (2020, 17 September). How Boeing and the F.A.A. created the 737 MAX
catastrophe. The New Yorker, https: //www .newyorker .com/ news/ our -columnists/
how -boeing -and -the -faa -created -the -737 -max -catastrophe (accessed 30 November
2020).
Chen, M. J. (2002). Transcending paradox: The Chinese “middle way” perspective.
Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2–3): 179–199.
Child, C. (2019). Whence paradox? Framing away the potential challenges of doing
well by doing good in social enterprise organizations. Organization Studies, 41(8):
1147–1167.
Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy,
organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and
Society, 40, 78–94.
Chytry, J. (2003). Between polis and poiēsis: On the ‘Cytherean’ ambiguities in the
poetry of James G. March. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4): 943–960.
Clair, J. A., & Dufresne, R. L. (2007). Changing poison into medicine: How companies
can experience positive transformation from a crisis. Organizational Dynamics,
36(1): 63–77.
Clark, C. M., Tan, M. L., Murfett, U. M., Rogers, P. S., & Ang, S. (2019). The call
center agent’s performance paradox: A mixed-methods study of discourse strategies
and paradox resolution. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(2): 152–170.
Clarke, C. A., & Knights, D. (2014). It’s a bittersweet symphony, this life: Fragile aca-
demic selves and insecure identities at work. Organization Studies, 35(3): 335–357.
Clarke, C., Knights, D., & Jarvis, C. (2012). A labour of love? Academics in business
schools. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28: 5–15.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London, UK: Sage.
Clegg, S. R. (1990). Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern
world. London, UK: Sage.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
138
Clegg, S. R. (1994). Weber and Foucault: Social theory for the study of organizations.
Organization, 1(1): 149–178.
Clegg, S. R. (ed.) (2002). Management and organization paradoxes. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Clegg, S. R., & Cunha, M. P. (2017). Organizational dialectics. In W. K. Smith, M.
W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (eds), The Oxford handbook of organiza-
tional paradox (pp. 105–124). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Clegg, S. R., & Dunkerley, D. (2013). Organization, class and control. London, UK:
Routledge.
Clegg, S. R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London,
UK: Sage.
Clegg, S. R., Cunha, M. P., & Berti, M. (2020). Research movements and theorizing
dynamics in management and organization studies. Academy of Management
Review. Published online: 29 October 2020, https:// doi .org/ 10 .5465/ amr .2018 .0466t
Clegg, S. R., Cunha, J. V., & Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A rela-
tional view. Human Relations, 55(5): 483–503.
Clegg, S. R., Cunha, M. P., & Rego, A. (2012). The theory and practice of utopia
in a total institution: The pineapple panopticon. Organization Studies, 33(12):
1735–1757.
Clegg, S. R., van Rijmenam, M. H., & Schweitzer, J. (2019). The politics of openness.
In D. Seidl, G. von Krogh, & R. Whittington (eds), Cambridge handbook of open
strategy, vol. 1 (pp. 307–325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clegg, S. R., Cunha, M. P., Rego, A., & Dias, J. (2013). Mundane objects and the banal-
ity of evil: The sociomateriality of a death camp. Journal of Management Inquiry,
22(3): 325–340.
Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., Pitsis, T., & Mount, M. (2019). Managing and organiza-
tions: An introduction to theory and practice (5th edn). London, UK: Sage.
Clegg, S. R., Simpson, A., Berti, M., & Cunha, M. P. (2020). Artificial intelligence
and the future of practical wisdom in business management. In B. Schwartz, C.
Bernacchio, C. González-Cantón, et al. (eds), Handbook of practical wisdom in
business and management. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Clegg, S. R., Cunha, M. P., Munro, I., Rego, A., & Sousa, M. O. (2016). Kafkaesque
power and bureaucracy. Journal of Political Power, 9(2): 157–181.
Clift, B., & Robles, T. A. (2020). The IMF, tackling inequality, and post-neoliberal
‘reglobalization’: The paradoxes of political legitimation within economistic param-
eters. Globalizations, 18(1): 39–54.
Clifton, D. O., & Harter, J. K. (2003). Investing in strengths. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton,
& R. Quinn (eds), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new disci-
pline (pp. 111–121). Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Cohen, S., & Taylor, L. (2003). Escape attempts: The theory and practice of resistance
in everyday life. London, UK: Routledge.
Collins, J. C. & Porras, J. I. (2005). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary compa-
nies. New York, NY: Random House.
Coman, S., & Casey, A. (2021). The enduring presence of the founder. In M. Maclean,
S. R. Clegg, R. Suddaby, & C. Harvey (eds), Historical organization studies: Theory
and applications (pp. 131–148). London, UK: Routledge.
Cooper, R. (1986). Organization/disorganization. Social Science Information, 25(2):
299–335.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 139
Cooren, F., & Seidl, D. (2020). Niklas Luhmann’s radical communication approach
and its implications for research on organizational communication. Academy of
Management Review, 45(2): 479–497.
Corritore, M., Goldberg, A., & Srivastava, S. B. (2020). The new analytics of culture.
Harvard Business Review, 98(1): 76–83.
Courpasson, D. (2000). Managerial strategies of domination. Power in soft bureaucra-
cies. Organization Studies, 21(1): 141–161.
Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., & Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues,
values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business
Ethics, 113(4): 567–581.
Crowley, M., Payne, J. C., & Kennedy, E. (2014). Working better together?
Empowerment, panopticon and conflict approaches to teamwork. Economic and
Industrial Democracy, 35(3): 483–506.
Crozier, M. (1964). The bureaucratic phenomenon. London, UK: Tavistock.
Cuganesan, S. (2017). Identity paradoxes: How senior managers and employees negoti-
ate similarity and distinctiveness tensions over time. Organization Studies, 38(3–4):
489–511.
Cunha, M. P., & Clegg, S. R. (2019). Improvisation in the learning organization:
A defense of the infra-ordinary. The Learning Organization, 26(3): 238–251.
Cunha, M. P., & Putnam, L. L. (2019). Paradox theory and the paradox of success.
Strategic Organization, 17(1): 95–106.
Cunha, M. P., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). Reforming the state: Understanding the vicious
circles of reform. European Management Journal, 33(4): 225–229.
Cunha, M. P., Clegg, S. R., Rego, A., & Berti, M. (2021). Paradoxes of power and
leadership. Cheltenham, UK: Routledge.
Cunha, M. P., Clegg, S. R., Rego, A., & Lancione, M. (2012). The Organization
(Ângkar) as a state of exception: The case of the S-21 extermination camp, Phnom
Penh. Journal of Political Power, 5(2): 279–299.
Cunha, M. P., Giustiniano, L., Rego, A., & Clegg, S.R. (2019a). Heaven or Las Vegas:
Competing institutional logics and individual experience. European Management
Review, 16(3): 781–798.
Cunha, M. P., Guimarães-Costa, N., Rego, A., & Clegg, S. R. (2010). Leading and
following (un)ethically in limen. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2): 189–206.
Cunha, M. P., Rego, A., Simpson, A. V., & Clegg, S. R. (2020). Positive organizational
behaviour: A reflective approach. London, UK: Routledge.
Cunha, M. P., Simpson, A. V., Clegg, S., & Rego, A. (2019b). Speak! Paradoxical
effects of a managerial culture of “speaking up”. British Journal of Management,
30(4): 829–846.
Cunha, M. P., Neves, P., Clegg, S. R., Costa, S., & Rego, A. (2018a). Paradoxes of
organizational change in a merger context. Qualitative Research in Organizations
and Management: An International Journal, 14(3): 217–240.
Cunha, M. P. Cardona, M. J., Clegg, S.R., Gomes, J. F., Matallana, M., Rego, A., &
Sánchez, I. D. (2018b). Through the looking glass: Leader personhood and the inter-
subjective construction of institutions. Journal of Political Power, 11(3): 378–402.
Currie, G., Lockett, A., & Suhomlinova, O. (2009). The institutionalization of distrib-
uted leadership: A ‘catch-22’in English public services. Human Relations, 62(11):
1735–1761.
Czakon, W., Srivastava, M. K., Le Roy, F., & Gnyawali, D. (2020). Coopetition strat-
egies: Critical issues and research directions. Long Range Planning, 53(1): 101874.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
140
Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Daar, A. S., Chang, T., Salomon, A., & Singer, A. (2018). Grand challenges in human-
itarian aid. Nature, July: 169–173.
D’Adderio, L., Glaser, V., & Pollock, N. (2019). Performing theories, transform-
ing organizations: A reply to Marti and Gond [letter to the editor]. Academy of
Management Review, 44(3): 676–679.
Davies, A. (2019). Water wars: Will politics destroy the Murray-Darling Basin plan –
and the river system itself? The Guardian, 14 December, https:// www .theguardian
.com/ australia -news/ 2019/ dec/ 14/ water -wars -will -politics -destroy -the -murray
-darling -basin -plan -and -the -river -system -itself (accessed 29 November 2020).
Davis, G. F. (2020). Corporate purpose needs democracy. Journal of Management
Studies. Online first. DOI: 10.1111/JOMS.12659
Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and
a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2): 309–344.
De Rond, M. (2012). There is an I in team: What elite athletes and coaches really know
about high performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Dekker, S. (2012). Just culture: Balancing safety and accountability. Farnham, UK:
Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007, 01/01). Strategizing in plural-
istic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60, DOI:
10.1177/0018726707075288
Dewettinck, K., & Buyens, D. (2006). Linking behavioral control to employee
outcomes: Testing two explanations using motivation theories. In Academy of
Management Proceedings. Best conference paper.
Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. London, UK:
Penguin.
Diamond, M. A. (1986). Resistance to change: A psychoanalytic critique of Argyris
and Schon’s contributions to organization theory and intervention. Journal of
Management Studies, 23(5): 543–562.
Dodd, D., & Favaro, K. (2006). Managing the right tension. Harvard Business Review,
84(12): 62–74.
Dopson, S., & Neumann, J. E. (1998). Uncertainty, contrariness and the double-bind:
Middle managers’ reactions to changing contracts. British Journal of Management,
9(3): S53–S70.
Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large
firms. Organization Science, 3(2): 179–202.
Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Drucker, P. F. (1995). Introduction: Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of management. In
P. Graham (ed.), Mary Parker Follett prophet of management: A celebration of
writings from the 1920s (pp. 1–10). Washington, DC: Beard Books.
Duran, J. (1993). Escher and Parmigianino: A study in paradox. The British Journal of
Aesthetics, 33(3): 239–246.
Dutton, J. E., & Glynn, M. A. (2008). Positive organizational scholarship. In C. Cooper
& J. Barling (eds), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 693–712). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dylan, B. (1966). Stuck inside of Mobile (with the Memphis blues again). Blonde on
blonde. New York, NY: Columbia CD.
Dylan, B. (2020). I contain multitudes. Rough and rowdy ways. New York, NY:
Columbia CD.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 141
Eden, C., Jones, S., Sims, D., & Smithin, T. (1981). The intersubjectivity of issues and
issues of intersubjectivity. Journal of Management Studies, 18(1): 37–47.
Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in
the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. New York, NY: John Wiley &
Sons.
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renais-
sance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational
Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1): 23–43.
Ehrig, T., & Schmidt, J. (2019). Making biased but better predictions: The tradeoffs
strategists face when they learn and use heuristics. Strategic Organization. Published
online first. DOI: 10.1177/1476127019869646
Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Jamming: Transcendence through organizing. Communication
Research, 17(2): 139–164.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2000). Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change
and pluralism. Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 703–705.
Ekman, S. (2012). Authority and autonomy: Paradoxes in modern knowledge work.
Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradic-
tions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of
Organizational Change Management, 24(3): 368–387.
Escher, M. C. (2000). MC Escher: The graphic work. Köln: Taschen.
Es-Sajjade, A., Pandza, K., & Volberda, H. (2020). Growing pains: Paradoxical
tensions and vicious cycles in new venture growth. Strategic Organization. First
published 21 June 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1476127020929003
Ewing, J. (2017). Faster, higher, farther: The inside story of the Volkswagen scandal.
New York, NY: Random House.
Eylon, D. (1998). Understanding empowerment and resolving its paradox. Journal of
Management History, 4(1): 16–28.
Fairhurst, G. T. (2019). Reflections: Return paradox to the wild? Paradox interventions
and their implications. Journal of Change Management, 19(1): 6–22.
Fairhurst, G. T., & Grant, D. (2010). The social construction of leadership: A sailing
guide. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2): 171–210.
Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2006). The hidden costs of control. The American Economic
Review, 96(5): 1611–1630.
Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of
Management Review, 35(2): 202–225.
Farjoun, M. (2019). Strategy and dialectics: Rejuvenating a long-standing relationship.
Strategic Organization, 17(1): 133–144.
Farjoun, M., Smith, W., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (eds) (2018). Dualities, dialectics,
and paradoxes in organizational life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Farson, R. (1996). Management of the absurd. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Feather, N. T. (1989). Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the tall poppy.
Australian Journal of Psychology, 41(3): 239–267.
Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory.
Organization Science, 22: 1240–1253.
Fineman, S. (2006). On being positive: Concerns and counterpoints. Academy of
Management Review, 31(2): 270–291.
Fiol, C. M. (2002). Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming
organizational identities. Organization Science, 13(6): 653–666.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
142
Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management
Reviews, 12(4): 384–412.
Fleming, P. (2013). ‘Down with Big Brother!’ The end of ‘corporate culturalism’?
Journal of Management Studies, 50(3): 474–495.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Power in management and organization science. The
Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 237–298.
Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. London: Longmans, Green and Company.
Follett, M. P. (1941 [2003]). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary
Parker Follett: Early sociology of management and organizations. Abingdon, UK:
Routledge.
Follett, M. P. (1995). Mary Parker Follett prophet of management: A celebration of
writings from the 1920s. Edited by P. Graham. Washington, DC: Beard Books.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Trans. A. Sheridan.
New York, NY: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings,
1972–1977. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. (1984). Truth and power. In P. Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault reader
(pp. 51–75). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Francis, H., & Keegan, A. (2018). The ethics of engagement in an age of austerity:
A paradox perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 162: 593–607. DOI: 10.1007/
s10551-018-3976-1
Fredrickson, B. (2009). Positivity. New York, NY: Crown.
Fredrickson, B. (2013). Updated thinking on positivity ratios. American Psychologist,
68(8): 814–822.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The
broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3): 218.
Freedman, L. (2020). Strategy for a pandemic: The UK and COVID-19. The Survival
Editors’ blog, https:// www .iiss .org/ blogs/ survival -blog/ 2020/ 05/ the -uk -and -covid
-19 (accessed 3 December 2020).
Friedman, M. (1970 [2007]). The social responsibility of business is to increase its
profits. In W. C. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger, & K. Richter (eds), Corporate ethics and
corporate governance (pp. 173–178). Berlin: Springer.
Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Rousseau, D. M., et al. (2020). Line managers as paradox naviga-
tors in HRM implementation: Balancing consistency and individual responsiveness.
Journal of Management, 46(2): 203–233.
Gaim, M., Clegg, S., & Cunha, M. P. (2019). Managing impressions rather than emis-
sions: Volkswagen and the false mastery of paradox. Organization Studies. DOI:
10.1177/0170840619891199 9
Gaim, M., Wåhlin, N., & Jacobsson, M. (2019). The role of space for a paradoxical way
of thinking and doing: A study of idea work in architectural firms. Creativity and
Innovation Management, 28(2): 265–281.
Gaim, M., Clegg, S. R., Cunha, M. P., & Berti, M. (2020). Responding to paradox: The
role of intensity. Unpublished manuscript.
Gannon, M. J., & Pillai, R. (2015). Understanding global cultures: Metaphorical jour-
neys through 34 nations, clusters of nations, continents, and diversity. Los Angeles,
CA: Sage.
Gapper, J. (2011). “America’s turbulent jobs flight”. Financial Times, 27 July,
https:// www .ft .com/ content/ 1d467a7c -b883 -11e0 -8206 -00144feabdc0 (accessed 10
December 2020).
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 143
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Garland, T., Jr. (2014). Trade-offs. Current Biology, 24(2): R60–R61.
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Tharchen, T. (2018). Performativity as ongoing journeys:
Implications for strategy, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Long Range Planning,
51(3): 500–509.
Gherardi, S. (1994). The gender we think, the gender we do in our everyday organiza-
tional lives. Human Relations, 47(6): 591–610.
Gherardi, S. (2012). How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods.
Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management prac-
tices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 75.
Gibeau, É., Langley, A., Denis, J. L., & van Schendel, N. (2019). Bridging competing
demands through co-leadership? Potential and limitations. Human Relations, 73(4).
DOI: 0018726719888145
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating
role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2):
209–226.
Gimpl, M. L., & Dakin, S. R. (1984). Management and magic. California Management
Review, 27(1): 125–136.
Giustiniano, L., Clegg, S. R., Cunha, M. P., & Rego, A. (2018). Elgar introduction to
theories of organizational resilience. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Giustiniano, L., Cunha, M. P., Simpson, A. V., Rego, A., & Clegg, S. (2020). Resilient
leadership as paradox work: Notes from COVID-19. Management and Organization
Review. Online first: DOI: 10.1017/mor.2020.57
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor
Books for Doubleday.
Goldstein, J., Hazy, J. K., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2010). The innovative power of posi-
tive deviance. In Complexity and the nexus of leadership (pp. 125–146). New York,
NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goldstein, L. (1996). Reflexivity, contradiction, paradox and M. C. Escher. Leonardo,
29(4): 299–308.
Gondo, M. B., & Amis, J. M. (2013). Variations in practice adoption: The roles of con-
scious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review, 38(2): 229–247.
Goode, E. (1991). Positive deviance: A viable concept? Deviant Behavior, 12(3):
289–309.
Goodman, P. S. (2000). Missing organizational linkages: Tools for cross-level
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership:
Development of leader-member exchange (LMX). Theory of leadership over 25
years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly,
6(2): 219–247.
Grebner, S., Semmer, N. K., & Elfering, A. (2005). Working conditions and three
types of well-being: A longitudinal study with self-report and rating data. Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology, 10(1): 31.
Greiner, L. E. (1998). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard
Business Review, 76(3): 55–64.
Gruber, J., & Trickett, E. J. (1987). Can we empower others? The paradox of empow-
erment in the governing of an alternative public school. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 15(3): 353–371.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
144
Guérard, S., Langley, A., & Seidl, D. (2013). Rethinking the concept of performance
in strategy research: Towards a performativity perspective. M@n@gement, 16(5):
566–578.
Guérin, P., Natalucci, F., & Suntheim, F. (2020). Firms’ environmental performance in
times of crisis. IMF Blog, 26 October 2020, https:// blogs .imf .org/ 2020/ 10/ 26/ firms
-environmental -performance -in -times -of -crisis
Gümüsay, A. A., Smets, M., & Morris, T. (2020). “God at work”: Engaging central and
incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Academy of Management
Journal, 63(1): 124.
Gylfe, P., Franck, H., & Vaara, E. (2019). Living with paradox through irony.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155: 68–82.
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hahn, T., & Knight, E. (2019). The ontology of organizational paradox: A quantum
approach. Academy of Management Review. Published online: 30 September 2019.
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2018.0408
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2010). Trade‐offs in corporate sustaina-
bility: You can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment,
19(4): 217–229.
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate
sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business
Ethics, 148(2): 235–248.
Halse, C., Honey, A., & Boughtwood, D. (2007). The paradox of virtue: (Re) thinking
deviance, anorexia and schooling. Gender and Education, 19(2): 219–235.
Hamel, G. (2007). The future of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change.
American Sociological Review, 49(2): 149–164.
Hargrave, T. (2021). The paradox perspective and the dialectics of contradiction
research. In M. S. Poole & A. Van de Ven (eds), The Oxford handbook of organiza-
tional change and innovation (2nd edn). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2017). Integrating dialectical and paradox
perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organization Studies,
38(3–4): 319–339.
Harris, C. J., & White, I. (1987). Advances in command, control and communication
systems. London, UK: Peregrinus.
Harrison, J. S., Phillips, R. A., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). On the 2019 Business
Roundtable “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation”. Journal of Management,
46(7): 1223–1237.
Harrison, S., Carlsen, A., & Skerlavaj, M. (2019). Marvel’s blockbuster machine:
How the studio balances continuity and renewal. Harvard Business Review, 97(4):
136–145.
Hatch, M. J. (1997). Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of
a management team. Organization Science, 8(3): 275–288.
Hatch, M. J., & Erhlich, S. B. (1993). Spontaneous humour as an indicator of paradox
and ambiguity in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(4): 505–526.
Hatch, M. J., Schultz, M., & Skov, A. M. (2015). Organizational identity and culture in
the context of managed change: Transformation in the Carlsberg Group, 2009–2013.
Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(1): 58–90.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1812 [2010]). The science of logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 145
Heil, J. F. (1996). Why is Aristotle’s brave man so frightened? The paradox of courage
in the “eudemian ethics". Apeiron, 29(1): 47.
Helbling, T. (2020). Externalities: Prices do not capture all costs. Finance & Development,
https:// www .imf .org/ external/ pubs/ ft/ fandd/ basics/ external .htm (accessed 3 December
2020).
Heller, J. (1961 [2010]). Catch-22: A novel. London, UK: Vintage Books.
Hengst, I.-A., Jarzabkowski, P., Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. (2020). Toward a process
theory of making sustainability strategies legitimate in action. Academy of
Management Journal, 63(1): 246–271.
Hennestad, B. W. (1990). The symbolic impact of double bind leadership: Double bind
and the dynamics of organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 27(3):
265–280.
Heracleous, L., & Wirtz, J. (2014). Singapore Airlines: Achieving sustainable advan-
tage through mastering paradox. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2):
150–170.
Heracleous, L., Papachroni, A., Andriopoulos, C., & Gotsi, M. (2017). Structural
ambidexterity and competency traps: Insights from Xerox PARC. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 117: 327–338.
Hernes, T., & Bakken, T. (2003). Implications of self-reference: Niklas Luhmann’s
autopoiesis and organization theory. Organization Studies, 24(9): 1511–1535.
Hill, A. (2019, 2 December). Messy jargon can swamp lucid business thinking.
Financial Times, 14.
Hirsch, F. (1978). Social limits to growth. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hodson, R., Martin, A. W., Lopez, S. H., & Roscigno, V. J. (2013a). Rules don’t apply:
Kafka’s insights on bureaucracy. Organization, 20(2): 256–278.
Hodson, R., Roscigno, V. J., Martin, A., & Lopez, S. H. (2013b). The ascension of
Kafkaesque bureaucracy in private sector organizations. Human Relations, 66(9):
1249–1273.
Howcroft, D., & Wilson, M. (2003). Paradoxes of participatory practices: The Janus
role of the systems developer. Information and Organization, 13(1): 1–24.
Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well‐being: Evidence regarding its causes and
consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(2): 137–164.
Huq, J.-L., Reay, T., & Chreim, S. (2017). Protecting the paradox of interprofessional
collaboration. Organization Studies, 38(3–4): 513–538.
Huy, Q. N. (2001). In praise of middle managers. Harvard Business Review, 79(8):
72–79.
ILO (2020). Global Wage Report 2020–21: Wages and minimum wages in the time
of COVID-19, https:// www .ilo .org/ global/ publications/ books/ WCMS _762534/ lang
- -en/ index .htm (accessed 3 December 2020).
IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2015). Guidance note for surveillance under Article
IV consultation (IMF Policy Papers), https:// www .imf .org/ ~/ media/ Websites/ IMF/
imported -full -text -pdf/ external/ np/ pp/ eng/ 2015/ _031915 .ashx (accessed 3 December
2020).
Irvine, A. D., & Deutsch, H. (2016). Russell’s paradox. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2016 edn.
Jackall, R. (1988). Moral Maze. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
Jamet, E. (2019, 16 May). Jacinda Ardern or inclusive leadership exemplified. Forbes.
Jansen, K. J. (2004). From persistence to pursuit: A longitudinal examination of
momentum during the early stages of strategic change. Organization Science, 15(3):
276–294.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
146
Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. (1999). The world in two and a third way out? The
concept of duality in organization theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of
Management, 15(2): 121–139.
Jarzabkowski, P. A., & Lê, J. K. (2017). We have to do this and that? You must be
joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization
Studies, 38(3–4): 433–462.
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., & Lê, J. (2018). Studying paradox as process and
practice: Identifying and following moments of salience and latency. In M. Farjoun,
W. Smith, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (eds), Perspectives on process organization
studies: Dualities, dialectics and paradoxes in organizational life (pp. 175–194).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. K., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to competing
strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve.
Strategic Organization, 11(3): 245–280.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid
organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 137–159.
Jeffries, F. L., & Reed, R. (2000). Trust and adaptation in relational contracting.
Academy of Management Review, 25: 873–882.
Jennings, P. D., & Hoffman, A. J. (2019). Three paradoxes of climate truth for
the Anthropocene social scientist. Organization & Environment. DOI:
1086026619858857
Johnson, B. (2014). Reflections: A perspective on paradox and its application to
modern management. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2): 206–212.
Joosten, A., Van Dijke, M., Van Hiel, A., et al. (2014). Being “in control” may make
you lose control: The role of self-regulation in unethical leadership behavior.
Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1): 1–14.
Josserand, E., Teo, S., & Clegg, S. R. (2006). From bureaucratic to post-bureaucratic:
The difficulties of transition. Journal of Organizational Change Management,
19(1): 54–64.
Kafka, F. (1925 [2007]). The Trial. Trans. D. Wyllie. Teddington, UK: Echo.
Kafka, F. (1926 [2009]). The Castle. Trans. A. Bell. Oxford, UK: Oxford University
Press.
Kaminska, I. (2019, 27 November). Gig employers are undermining the social contract.
Financial Times, 9.
Kaplan, S. (2019). The 360° corporation: From stakeholder trade-offs to transforma-
tion. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & McMillan, D. (2020). Updating the business scorecard for triple
bottom line strategies. Harvard Business School Working Paper 21-028.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996a). Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy.
California Management Review, 39(1): 53–79.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996b). Using the balanced score card as a strategic
management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1): 75–85.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd edn). New
York, NY: Wiley.
Kaufman, A., & Englander, E. (2005). A team production model of corporate govern-
ance. Academy of Management Executive, 19(3): 9–22.
Keller, J., & Chen, E. W. (2017). A road map of the paradoxical mind. In W. K. Smith,
M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (eds), The Oxford handbook of organ-
izational paradox (pp. 66–86). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 147
Keller, J., Loewenstein, J., & Yan, J. (2017). Culture, conditions and paradoxical
frames. Organization Studies, 38(3–4): 539–560.
Keller, J., Wong, S.-S., & Liou, S. (2020). How social networks facilitate collective
responses to organizational paradoxes. Human Relations, 73(3): 401–428.
Kenny, K. (2019). Whistleblowing: Toward a new theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Kentikelenis, A. E., Stubbs, T. H., & King, L. P. (2016). IMF conditionality and devel-
opment policy space, 1985–2014. Review of International Political Economy, 23(4):
543–582.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1995). Organizational paradoxes: Clinical approaches to
management. London, UK: Routledge.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2011). The hedgehog effect: The secrets of building high per-
formance teams. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Keynes, J. M. (1930 [1963]). Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In Essays in
Persuasion (pp. 358–373). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
Khorasani, S. T., & Almasifar, M. (2017). Evolution of management theory within
20 century: A systemic overview of paradigm shifts in management. International
Review of Management and Marketing, 7(3).
Kilduff, M., Mehra, A., & Dunn, M. B. (2011). From blue sky research to problem
solving: A philosophy of science theory of new knowledge production. Academy of
Management Review, 36(2): 297–317.
Kirn, W. (2010, 15 February). The fakery of CEOs undercover. Bloomberg
BusinessWeek, 78–79.
Kizilos, P. (1990). Crazy about empowerment? Training, December: 47–56.
Knight, E., & Paroutis, S. (2017). Becoming salient: The TMT leader’s role in shaping
the interpretive context of paradoxical tensions. Organization Studies, 38(3–4):
403–432.
Korczynski, M. (2011). The dialectical sense of humour: Routine joking in a Taylorized
factory. Organization Studies, 32(10): 1421–1439.
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional plu-
ralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds), The
Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). London, UK: Sage.
Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., Wright, P., & Kroll, M. (2006). Paradox and theorizing
within the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 115–131.
Langfred, C. W. (2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of
the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing
teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4): 885–900.
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies
of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and
flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 1–13.
Law, J. (2008). On sociology and STS. The Sociological Review, 56(4): 623–649.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment. Boston, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Leonard‐Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in man-
aging new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1): 111–125.
Leonardi, P. (2020). You’re going digital – now what? MIT Sloan Management Review,
61(2) (Winter): 28–30, 32–35.
Levinson, H. M. (1960). Pattern bargaining: A case study of the automobile workers.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74(2): 296–317.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
148
Lévi-Strauss C. (1967). Structural anthropology. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor
Books.
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide.
Academy of Management Review, 25(4): 760–776.
Lewis, M. W., & Dehler, G. E. (2000). Learning through paradox: A pedagogical
strategy for exploring contradictions and complexity. Journal of Management
Education, 24(6): 708–725.
Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective:
Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. Journal of Applied Behavioral
Science, 50(2): 127–149.
Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical leadership to
enable strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3): 58–77.
Lewis, M., Smith, W. K., Jarzabkowski, P., & Langley, A. (eds) (2017). The Oxford
handbook of organizational paradox: Approaches to plurality, tensions, and contra-
dictions (pp. 105–124). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, R. L., Brown, D. A., & Sutton, N. C. (2019). Control and empowerment as an
organising paradox: Implications for management control systems. Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(2): 483–507.
Li, J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic
fault lines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management
Journal, 48(5): 794–813.
Li, P. P. (1998). Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic,
dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19(5): 829–861.
Li, P. P. (2014). The unique value of Yin-Yang balancing: A critical response.
Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 321–332.
Li, P. P. (2016). Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the
East: how to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cultural &
Strategic Management, 23(1): 42–77.
Li, X. (2020). Solving paradox by reducing expectation. Academy of Management
Review. Published online:7 May 2020. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2020.0005
Lindberg, O., Rantatalo, O., & Hällgren, M. (2017). Making sense through false
syntheses: Working with paradoxes in the reorganization of the Swedish police.
Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(3): 175–184.
Lindgreen, A., & Maon, F. (2019). Organization and management paradoxes.
International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(2): 139–142.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public
service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Liu, Y., Xu, S., & Zhang, B. (2020). Thriving at work: How a paradox mindset influ-
ences innovative work behaviour. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3):
347–366.
Locke, E. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human
Performance, 4(4): 309–336.
Lockwood, C., Giorgi, S., & Glynn, M. A. (2019). “How to do things with words”:
Mechanisms bridging language and action in management research. Journal of
Management, 45(1): 7–34.
Logue, D. M., Jarvis, W. P., Clegg, S. R., & Hermens, A. (2015). Translating models
of organization: Can the Mittelstand move from Bavaria to Geelong? Journal of
Management & Organization, 21(01): 17–36.
Lopes, P. (2005). Signifying deviance and transgression: Jazz in the popular imagina-
tion. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(11): 1468–1481.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 149
Lounsbury, M., & Carberry, E. J. (2005). From king to court jester? Weber’s fall from
grace in organizational theory. Organization Studies, 26(4): 0170–8406.
Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer & J. van der
Zouwen (eds), Sociocybernetic paradoxes, vol. 6 (pp. 172–192). London, UK:
SAGE.
Luhmann, N. (1995a). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1995b). The paradoxy of observing systems. Cultural Critique, 31:
37–55.
Luhmann, N. (2018). Organization and decision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sen-
semaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2):
221–240.
Luscombe, B. (2020). A year after Christchurch, Jacinda Ardern has the world’s atten-
tion. How will she use it? Time, 20 February.
Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society –
a relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1): 99–115.
Mahoney, J. (1998). Editorial adieu: Cultivating moral courage in business. Business
Ethics: A European Review, 7(4): 187–192.
Manson, M. (2016). The subtle art of not giving a f*ck: A counterintuitive approach to
living a good life. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
March, J. G. (ed.) (1965 [2013]). Handbook of organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand
McNally.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.
Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.
March, J. G. (2006a). Poetry and the rhetoric of management: Easter 1916. Journal of
Management Inquiry, 15(1): 70–72.
March, J. G. (2006b). Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic
Management Journal, 27(3): 201–214.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
March, J. G., & Weil, T. (2009). On leadership. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
March, J. G., Schulz, M., & Zhou, X. (2000). The dynamics of rules: Change in written
organizational codes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Marti, E., & Gond, J.-P. (2018). When do theories become self-fulfilling? Exploring
the boundary conditions of performativity. Academy of Management Review, 43(3):
487–508.
Martin, R. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive
advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. New York, NY: Vintage.
Marx, K. (1976). Capital (Vol. 1). London: NLR/Penguin.
Masters, B. (2019). Boeing will pay for cosy relations with regulators. Financial Times,
4 December, 13.
Masuch, .M (1985). Vicious circles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly,
30(1): 14–33.
Mayer, C. (2020). The future of the corporation and the economics of purpose. Journal
of Management Studies. DOI: 101111/JOMS.12660
McCabe, D. (2016). ‘Curiouser and curiouser!’: Organizations as Wonderland – a met-
aphorical alternative to the rational model. Human Relations, 69(4): 945–973.
McKenna, B., Rooney, D., & Boal, K. B. (2009). Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical
basis for evaluating leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2): 177–190.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
150
McKenna, S., Garcia-Lorenzo, L., & Bridgman, T. (2010). Managing, manage-
rial control and managerial identity in the post-bureaucratic world. Journal of
Management Development, 29(2): 128–136.
McNulty, J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive:
A contextual analysis of the long-term effects of problem-solving behaviors on
changes in relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
98(4): 587–604.
McTague, T. (2020). How the pandemic revealed Britain’s national illness. The
Atlantic, 12 August 2020, https:// www .theatlantic .com/ international/ archive/ 2020/
08/ why -britain -failed -coronavirus -pandemic/ 615166/ (accessed 3 December 2020).
Mease, J. J. (2019). Applied tensional analysis: Engaging practitioners and the consti-
tutive shift. Management Learning, 50(4): 409–426.
Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action.
American Sociological Review, 1(6): 894–904.
Metcalf, W. (1940). The reality of the unobservable. Philosophy of Science, 7(3):
337–341.
Methmann, C. P. (2010). ‘Climate protection’ as empty signifier: A discourse theo-
retical perspective on climate mainstreaming in world politics. Millennium, 39(2):
345–372.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as
myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363.
Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. A. (1995). Crossroads tempered radicalism and the
politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6(5): 585–600.
Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J., et al. (2013). The relationship between ethical leadership
and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects? Journal of
Business Ethics, 116(3): 641–653.
Michel, A. (2014). The mutual constitution of persons and organizations: An ontologi-
cal perspective on organizational change. Organization Science, 25(4): 1082–1110.
Mikkelsen, E. N., & Wahlin, R. (2020). Dominant, hidden and forbidden sensemaking:
The politics of ideology and emotions in diversity management. Organization,
27(4): 557–577.
Miller, D. (1993). The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review,
18(1): 116.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1980). Momentum and revolution in organizational adap-
tation. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4): 591–614.
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in
competitive advantage from great family businesses. Boston, MA: Harvard Business
Press.
Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and crea-
tive sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2): 229–240.
Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2018).
Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the
problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1): 26–45.
Miska, C., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2018). Responsible leadership: A mapping of extant
research and future directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1): 117–134.
Momani, B. (2010). Internal or external norm champions: The IMF and multilateral
debt relief. In S. Park & A. Vetterlein (eds), Owning development: Creating policy
norms in the IMF and the World Bank (pp. 29–47). New York, NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 151
Morgan, G. (2011). Reflections on images of organization and its implications for
organization and environment. Organization & Environment, 24(4): 459–478.
Murnighan, J. K., & Conlon, D. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups:
A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 165–186.
Murrell, K. L. (1985). The development of a theory of empowerment: Rethinking
power for organization development. Organization Development Journal, Summer:
34–38.
Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Neumann, J. E., James, K. T., & Vince, R. (2019). Key tensions in purposive action by
middle managers leading change. In A. B. Shani & D. A. Noumair (eds), Research
in Organizational Change and Development, 27: 111–140.
Newark, D. (2018). Leadership and the logic of absurdity. Academy of Management
Review, 43(2): 198–216.
Nguyen-Vo, T.-H. (2012). The ironies of freedom: Sex, culture, and neoliberal govern-
ance in Vietnam. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical
lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies, 30(12): 1391–1418.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions:
Understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4):
321–334.
Offe, C., & Wiesenthal, H. (1980). Two logics of collective action: Theoretical notes
on social class and organizational form. Political Power and Social Theory, 1(1):
67–115.
O’Neill, O. A., Stanley, L. J., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2011). Disaffected Pollyannas: The
influence of positive affect on salary expectations, turnover, and long‐term satis-
faction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(3): 599–617.
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past,
present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4): 324–338.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation
of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1):
433–474.
Ortiz, J. T. (2020). Political leadership for peace processes: Juan Manuel Santos –
between hawk and dove. Leadership. DOI: 10.1177/1742715020951229
Orwell, G. (1946) Politics and the English language. Horizon (April 1946 issue), http://
www .public -library .uk/ ebooks/ 72/ 30 .pdf
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. London, UK: Martin Secker & Warburg.
Ostry, J. D., Loungani, P., & Furceri, D. (2016). Neoliberalism: Oversold. Finance &
Development, 53(2): 38–41.
Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organi-
zations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science,
24(5): 1517–1538.
Owens, B. P., Wallace, A. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). Leader narcissism and fol-
lower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 100(4): 1203–1213.
Oxfam (2020). IMF paves way for new era of austerity post-COVID-19, https://
www .oxfam .org/ en/ press -releases/ imf -paves -way -new -era -austerity -post -covid -19
(accessed 30 November 2020).
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
152
Oxfam Canada (2016). An economy for the 1%. www .oxfam .ca/ our -work/ publications/
an-economy-for-the-1 (accessed 30 January 2020).
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2012). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling
as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal,
56(4): 972–1001.
Pacheco de Almeida, G., Henderson, J. E., & Cool, K. O. (2008). Resolving the
commitment versus flexibility trade-off: The role of resource accumulation lags.
Academy of Management Journal, 51(3): 517–536.
Padavic, I., Ely, R. J., & Reid, E. M. (2020). Explaining the persistence of gender ine-
quality: The work–family narrative as a social defense against the 24/7 work culture.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1): 61–111.
Page, R. (2011). Co-determination in Germany – a beginners’ guide. Arbeitspapiere,
33. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.
Palmer, D. (2012). Normal organizational wrongdoing: A critical analysis of theories
of misconduct in and by organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Papachroni, A., & Heracleous, L. (2020). Ambidexterity as practice: Individual ambi-
dexterity through paradoxical practices. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
56(2): 143–165.
Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American
Philosophical Society, 107(3): 232–258.
Parsons, T. (1964). Evolutionary universals in society. American Sociological Review,
29(3): 339–357.
Pascale, R. T., & Sternin, J. (2005). Your company’s secret change agents. Harvard
Business Review, 83(5): 72–81.
Pérezts, M., Bouilloud, J.-P., & de Gaulejac, V. (2011). Serving two masters: The con-
tradictory organization as an ethical challenge for managerial responsibility. Journal
of Business Ethics, 101(1): 33–44.
Perrow, C. (1977). The bureaucratic paradox: The efficient organization centralizes in
order to decentralize. Organizational Dynamics, 5(4): 3–14.
Peters, T., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s
best-run companies. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2011). Character strengths and virtues: Their role in
well-being. In S. I. Donaldson, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & J. Nakamura (eds), Applied
positive psychology: Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and society
(pp. 49–62). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A hand-
book and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Petriglieri, G. (2020). F**k science!? An invitation to humanize organ-
ization theory. Organization Theory. First published 23 January 2020. DOI:
10.1177/2631787719897663
Petriglieri, G., & Petriglieri, J. (2020). The return of the oppressed: A systems psycho-
dynamic approach to organization studies. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1):
411–449.
Petriglieri, G., Petriglieri, J. L., & Wood, J. D. (2018). Fast tracks and inner jour-
neys: Crafting portable selves for contemporary careers. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 63(3): 479–525.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total non-
sense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business
School Press.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 153
Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in manage-
ment. Journal of Management, 39(2): 313–338.
Pigou, A. C. (2013). The economics of welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pink, D. (2009). Drive. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Pinkse, J., Hahn, T., & Figge, F. (2019). Supersized tensions and slim responses?
The discursive construction of strategic tensions around social issues. Academy of
Management Discoveries, 5(3): 314–340.
Pirson, M. (2019). A humanistic perspective for management theory: Protecting dignity
and promoting well-being. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1): 39–57.
Poole, M. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and
organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 562–578.
Porter, E. (2002). What is this thing called jazz? African American musicians as artists,
critics, and activists. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business
Review, 89(1/2): 62–77.
Pradies, C., Tunarosa, A., Lewis, M. W., & Courtois, J. (2020). From vicious to virtu-
ous paradox dynamics: The social-symbolic work of supporting actors. Organization
Studies. First published 18 March 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0170840620907200
Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple
organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 18–42.
Priest, G. (1979). The logic of paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 219–241.
Priest, G., Berto, F., & Weber, Z. (2018). Dialetheism. The Stanford encyclopedia of
philosophy (Fall 2018 edn), https:// plato .stanford .edu/ entries/ dialetheism/ (accessed
10 December 2020).
Prillaman, S. A., & Meier, K. J. (2014). Taxes, incentives, and economic growth:
Assessing the impact of pro-business taxes on US state economies. The Journal of
Politics, 76(2): 364–379.
Putnam, L. L. (1986). Contradictions and paradoxes in organizations. In L. Thayer (ed.),
Organization communications: Emerging perspectives (pp. 151–167). Norwood,
NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Putnam, L. L., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2017). Gender and organizational paradox. In W. K.
Smith, M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (eds), The Oxford handbook of
organizational paradox (pp. 331–352). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and
paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management
Annals, 10(1): 65–171.
Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2014). Examining the tensions in
workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations,
67(4): 413–440.
Quinn, R. E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and com-
peting demands of high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Quinn, R. E. (2015). The positive organization: Breaking free from conventional
cultures, constraints, and beliefs. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory
of change in organization and management. New York, NY: Ballinger.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
154
Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1985). The transformation of organizational cultures:
A competing values perspective. In P. J. Frost, L. Moore, M. R. Louis, et al. (eds),
Organizational culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raisch, S., Hargrave, T. J., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2018). The learning spiral: A process
perspective on paradox. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8): 1507–1526.
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational
ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance.
Organization Science, 20(4): 685–695.
Ramarajan, L. (2014). Past, present and future research on multiple identities: Toward
an intrapersonal network approach. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1): 589–659.
Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. W. (2016). A realist perspective of entrepreneurship:
Opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review, 41(3): 410–434.
Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2014). The coopetition paradox and tension
in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2): 189–198.
Reardon, K. (2007). Courage as a skill. Harvard Business Review, January: 58–64.
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional
logics. Organization Studies, 30(6): 629–652.
Rego, A., Cunha, M. P., & Clegg, S. R. (2012). The virtues of leadership: Contemporary
challenges for global managers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rego, A., Owens, B., Yam, K. C., et al. (2019). Leader humility and team performance:
Exploring the mediating mechanisms of team PsyCap and task allocation effective-
ness. Journal of Management, 45(3): 1009–1033.
Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D. (2002). Capability traps and self-confirming
attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 47(2): 265–295.
Rescher, N. (1960). Choice without preference. A study of the history and of the logic
of the problem of “Buridan’s Ass”. Kant-Studien, 51(1–4): 142–175.
Rescher, N. (2001). Paradoxes: Their roots, range, and resolution. Chicago, IL: Open
Court.
Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. Boston, MA: Allyn &
Bacon.
Ritzer, G. (1990). Metatheorizing in sociology: The basic parameters and the potential
contributions of postmodernism. Sociological Forum, 5(1): 3–15.
Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldization of society. London, UK: Pine Forge Press.
Riviezzo, A., Garofano, A., Napolitano, M. R., & Marino, V. (2015). Moving forward
or running to standstill? Exploring the nature and the role of family firms’ strategic
orientation. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(3): 190–205.
Rizio, S. M., & Skali, A. (2019). How often do dictators have positive economic
effects? Global evidence, 1858–2010. The Leadership Quarterly. Published 1 June
2019.
Ro, C. (2020). The Covid-19 recession is unique among modern economic shocks in
its harm to women’s finances and prospects. Can this be reversed? https:// www
.bbc .com/ worklife/ article/ 20201021 -why -this -recession -disproportionately -affects
-women (accessed 5 December 2020).
Roberts, K. H., & Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Research in nearly failure-free, high-reliability
organizations: Having the bubble. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,
36(2): 132–139.
Roberts, L. M. (2006). Shifting the lens on organizational life: The added value of
positive scholarship. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 292–305.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 155
Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated
equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5): 1141–1166.
Rowden, R. (2013). The deadly ideas of neoliberalism: How the IMF has undermined
public health and the fight against AIDS. London, UK: Zed Books.
Sandelands, L. E., & Carlsen, A. (2013). The romance of wonder in organization
studies. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 10(4): 358–379.
Sasaki, I., Ravasi, D., & Micelotta, E. (2019). Family firms as institutions: Cultural
reproduction and status maintenance among multi-centenary shinise in Kyoto.
Organization Studies, 40(6): 793–831.
Schabram, K., & Maitlis, S. (2017). Negotiating the challenges of a calling: Emotion
and enacted sensemaking in animal shelter work. Academy of Management Journal,
60(2): 584–609.
Schad, J. (2017). Ad Fontes. Philosophical foundations of paradox research. In W. K.
Smith, M. W. Lewis, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (eds), The Oxford handbook of
organizational paradox (pp. 27–47). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Schad, J., & Bansal, P. (2018). Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspec-
tive informs paradox research. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8): 1490–1506.
Schad, J., & Smith, W. K. (2019). Addressing grand challenges’ paradoxes: Leadership
skills to manage inconsistencies. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(4): 55–59.
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2019). Quo vadis, paradox? Centripetal and
centrifugal forces in theory development. Strategic Organization, 17(1): 107–119.
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in
management science: Looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management
Annals, 10(1): 5–64.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York, NY: Holt,
Reinhart, and Winston.
Schilling, M. A. (2000). Decades ahead of her time: Advancing stakeholder theory
through the ideas of Mary Parker Follett. Journal of Management History, 6(5):
224–242.
Schulz, M., Hatch, M. J., & Larsen, M. H. (eds) (2000). The expressive organiza-
tion: Linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand. Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Schütz, A. (1974). The structures of the life-world. London, UK: Heinemann.
Schwartz, B. (2011). Practical wisdom and organizations. Research in Organizational
Behavior, 31: 3–23.
Seidl, D. (2004). Luhmann’s theory of autopoietic social systems. Working paper.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München-Munich School of Management, https://
www .zfog .bwl .uni -muenchen .de/ files/ mitarbeiter/ paper2004 _2 .pdf. (accessed 9
December 2020).
Seidl, D., & Mormann, H. (2014). Niklas Luhmann as organization theorist. In P.
Adler, P. du Gay, G. Morgan, & M. Reed (eds), Oxford handbook of sociology,
social theory and organization studies: Contemporary currents (pp. 125–157).
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Seltzer, L. F. (1986). Paradoxical strategies in psychotherapy: A comprehensive over-
view and guidebook. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). Dualities and tensions of planned
organizational change. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (eds), Handbook of
organizational change and innovation (pp. 73–107). New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
156
Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). Empowerment or emasculation? Shopfloor
surveillance in a Total Quality Organization. In P. Blyton & P. Turnbull (eds),
Reassessing human resource management (pp. 97–115). London, UK: Sage.
Shapira, Z. (2011). “I’ve got a theory paper – do you?”: Conceptual, empirical, and
theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organization
Science, 22(5): 1312–1321.
Sharma, G., & Bansal, P. (2017). Partners for good: How business and NGOs engage
the commercial–social paradox. Organization Studies, 38(3–4): 341–364.
Sheep, M. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Khazanchi, S. (2017). Knots in the discourse of
innovation: Investigating multiple tensions in a reacquired spin-off. Organization
Studies, 38(3–4): 463–488.
Shenhav, Y. (1995). From chaos to systems: The engineering foundations of organiza-
tion theory, 1879–1932. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 557–585.
Silva, T., Cunha, M. P., Clegg, S. R., Neves, P., Rego, A., & Rodrigues, R. A. (2014).
Smells like team spirit: Opening a paradoxical black box. Human Relations, 67(3):
287–310.
Simon, B. L. (1990). Rethinking empowerment. Journal of Progressive Human
Services, 1(1): 27–39.
Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Simons, R. (1995). Levels of control. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Simpson, A. V., & Berti, M. (2020). Transcending organizational compassion para-
doxes by enacting wise compassion courageously. Journal of Management Inquiry,
29(4): 433–449.
Simpson, A. V., Clegg, S., & Freeder, D. (2013). Power, compassion and organization.
Journal of Political Power, 6(3): 385–404.
Simpson, A. V., Clegg, S., Lopes, M. P., et al. (2014a). Doing compassion or doing dis-
cipline? Power relations and the Magdalene Laundries. Journal of Political Power,
7(2): 253–274.
Simpson, A. V., Clegg, S., & Pitsis, T. (2014b). Normal compassion: A framework for
compassionate decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4): 473–491.
Skousen, M., & Taylor, K. C. (1997). Puzzles and paradoxes in economics. Cheltenham,
UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance trading in
Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice.
Academy of Management Journal, 58(3): 932.
Smets, M., Moss Cowan, A., Athanasopoulou, A., Moos, C., & Morris, T. J. (2019).
Taking to making paradox: A multi-level perspective on how CEOs balance nested
paradoxes. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1): 18917.
Smith, I.H., & Kouchaki, M. (2018). Moral humility: In life and at work. Research in
Organizational Behavior, 38: 77–94.
Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict,
paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing
strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6): 1592–1623.
Smith, W. K., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Bowing before dual gods: How structured
flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly,
64(1): 1–44.
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilib-
rium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2): 381–403.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 157
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2012). Leadership skills for managing paradoxes.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(2): 227–231.
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top
management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5):
522–536.
Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. L. (2016). Both/and leadership. Harvard
Business Review, 94(5): 62–70.
Smith, W. K., Erez, M., Jarvenpaa, S., Lewis, M. W., & Tracey, P. (2017). Adding
complexity to theories of paradox, tensions, and dualities of innovation and change:
Introduction to Organization Studies special issue on paradox, tensions, and dualities
of innovation and change. Organization Studies, 38(3–4): 303–317.
Smythe, J. (2019). Jacinda Ardern’s ‘solace and steel’ seen uniting New Zealand.
Financial Times, 22 March.
Soderstrom, S. B., & Heinze, K. L. (2019). From paradoxical thinking to practicing
sustainable business: The role of a business collective organization in supporting
entrepreneurs. Organization & Environment. First published 6 November 2019,
DOI: 10.1177/1086026619885108
Sorensen, R., & Sainsbury, M. (2020). The number of unknown paradoxes. Philosophy,
95(2): 155–159.
Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2003). Positive deviance and extraordinary organ-
izing. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (eds), Positive organizational
scholarship (pp. 207–224). San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler.
Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive
deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6): 828.
Stacey, K. (2019). Boeing staffer warned of 737 Max risk. Financial Times, 12
December, 12.
Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. Oakland, CA:
Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2002). Complexity and management. London,
UK: Routledge.
Stadtler, L., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2016). Coopetition as a paradox: Integrative
approaches in a multi-company, cross-sector partnership. Organization Studies,
37(5): 655–685.
Stark, D. (1999). Heterarchy: Distributing authority and organizing diversity. In J. H.
Clippinger III (ed.), The biology of business: Decoding the natural laws of enterprise
(pp. 153–179). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stearns, S. C. (1989). Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Functional Ecology, 3(3):
259–268.
Stein, M. (2003). Unbounded irrationality: Risk and organizational narcissism at long
term capital management. Human Relations, 56(5): 523–540.
Sterman, J. D., Repenning, N. P., & Kofman, F. (1997). Unanticipated side effects of
successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement.
Management Science, 43(4): 503–521.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. A. C. Baum & F.
Dobbin (eds), Economics meets sociology in strategic management. Advances in
strategic management, volume 17 (pp. 229–259). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Stohl, C., & Stohl, M. (2017). Clandestine/hidden organizations. In The international
encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1–9). Chichester, UK and New
York, NY: London: John Wiley & Sons.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
158
Stouten, J., Van Dijke, M., Mayer, D. M., et al. (2013). Can a leader be seen as too
ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly,
24(5): 680–695.
Streatfield, P. J. (2001). The paradox of control in organizations. London, UK:
Routledge.
Strese, S., Meuer, M. W., Flatten, T. C., & Brettel, M. (2016). Examining cross-functional
coopetition as a driver of organizational ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing
Management, 57: 40–52.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches.
Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610.
Sull, D. N., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2015). Simple rules: How to thrive in a complex
world. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of
governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 397–415.
Switek, G. (2016). A simple idea in architecture: On the principles of projecting
prisons. In J. Simon, T. Nicholas, & R. Tobe (eds), Architecture and justice: Judicial
meanings in the public realm. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Takeuchi, H. T., Osono, E., & Shimizu, N. (2008). The contradictions that drive
Toyota’s success. Harvard Business Review, 86(6): 96–104.
Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy.
Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 314–329.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). Principles of scientific management. New York, NY: W. W.
Norton.
Taylor, M. (2010). Does locus of control predict young adult conflict strategies with
superiors? An examination of control orientation and the organisational communi-
cation conflict instrument. North American Journal of Psychology, 12(3): 445–458.
Ten Bos, R., & Rhodes, C. (2003). The game of exemplarity: Subjectivity, work and the
impossible politics of purity. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19(4): 403–423.
Tetenbaum, T. J. (1998). Shifting paradigms: From Newton to chaos. Organizational
Dynamics, 26(4): 21–33.
Tett, G. (2015). The silo effect: The peril of expertise and the promise of breaking down
barriers. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Thomas, K.W., & Velthouse, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An
“interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review,
15(4): 666–681.
Thornborrow, T., & Brown, A. D. (2009). Being regimented: Aspiration, discipline
and identity work in the British parachute regiment. Organization Studies, 30(4):
355–376.
Tracy, S. J. (2004). Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing
employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication
Research, 32(2): 119–146.
Treffers, T., Klarner, P., & Huy, Q. N. (2020). Emotions, time, and strategy: The effects
of happiness and sadness on strategic decision-making under time constraints. Long
Range Planning, 53(5): 101954.
Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal
analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4):
378–385.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3):
403.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 159
Tsoukas, H. (2017). Don’t simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjunctive the-
orizing in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies,
54(2): 132–153.
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organiza-
tional change. Organization Science, 13(5): 567–582.
Tsoukas, H., & Cunha, M. P. (2017). On organizational circularity: Vicious and
virtuous circles in organizing. In M. W. Lewis, W. K. Smith, P. Jarzabkowski, &
A. Langley (eds), The Oxford handbook of organizational paradox: Approaches
to plurality, tensions, and contradictions (pp. 393–412). New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Tsoukas, H., Patriotta, G., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Maitlis, S. (2020). On the way to Ithaka:
Commemorating the 50th anniversary of the publication of Karl E. Weick’s The
social psychology of organizing. Journal of Management Studies, 57(7): 1315–1330.
Tuckermann, H. (2018). Visibilizing and invisibilizing paradox: A process study
of interactions in a hospital executive board. Organization Studies. DOI:
10.1177/0170840618800100
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing
evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4):
8–29.
Tye-Williams, S., & Krone, K. J. (2017). Identifying and re-imagining the paradox of
workplace bullying advice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(2):
218–235.
Tyler, E. R., & Blader, S. L. (2005). Can business effectively regulate employee
conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Academy of Management
Journal, 48(6): 1143–1158.
Upchurch, M., & Grassman, R. (2016). Striking with social media: The contested
(online) terrain of workplace conflict. Organization, 23(5): 639–656.
Vaill, P. B. (1998). Spirited leading and learning: Process wisdom for a new age. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Van Buren, M., & Safferstone, T. (2009). The quick wins paradox. Harvard Business
Review, 87(1): 54–61.
Van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K. (2015). Compassionate love as a cornerstone of
servant leadership: An integration of previous theorizing and research. Journal of
Business Ethics, 128(1): 119–131.
van Zoonen, W., Verhoeven, J. W., & Vliegenthart, R. (2016). Social media’s dark side:
Inducing boundary conflicts. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(8): 1297–1311.
Veblen, T. B. (1899 [2007]). The theory of the leisure class. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Verhoest, K., Peters, G., Boukart, G., & Vershuere, B. (2004). The study of organi-
sational autonomy: A conceptual review. Public Administration and Development,
24(2): 101–118.
Vignehsa, K. (2014). Stuckedness: On the organizational art of forbearance. University
of Technology Sydney doctoral dissertation.
Vince, R., & Broussine, M. (1996). Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and
working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization
Studies, 17(1): 1–21.
Vohnsen, N. H. (2015). Street-level planning: The shifty nature of “local knowledge
and practice”. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 4(2): 147–161.
Vohnsen, N. H. (2017). The absurdity of bureaucracy: How implementation works.
Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

Elgar introduction to organizational paradox theory
160
Voronov, M., & Weber, K. (2020). People, actors, and the humanizing of institutional
theory. Journal of Management Studies, 57(4): 873–884.
Wagner, J. A. I. (1978). The organizational double bind: Toward an understanding of
rationality and its complement. Academy of Management Review, 3(4): 786–795.
Waldman, D. A., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader.
Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3): 316–327.
Waldman, D. A., Putnam, L. L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Siegel, D. (2019). The role
of paradox theory in decision making and management research. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155(81): 1–6.
Walker, M., Fleming, P., & Berti M. (2020). “You can’t pick up a phone and talk to
someone”: How algorithms function as biopower in the gig economy. Organization.
Online first.
Wang, A. C. (2019). Developmental or exploitative? How Chinese leaders inte-
grate authoritarianism and benevolence to cultivate subordinates. Academy of
Management Discoveries, 5(3): 291–313.
Watzlawick, P. (1965). Paradoxical predictions. Psychiatry, 28(4): 368.
Watzlawick, P., Jackson, D. D., & Bavelas, J. B. (1967). Pragmatics of human commu-
nication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York,
NY: Norton.
Waycott, J., Thompson, C., Sheard, J., & Clerehan, R. (2017). A virtual panopticon in
the community of practice: Students’ experiences of being visible on social media.
The Internet and Higher Education, 35: 12–20.
Weber, M. (1948). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Translated, edited and with
introduction by H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (2nd edn). Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
Weick, K. E. (1992). Agenda setting in organizational behavior: A theory-focused
approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1(3): 171–182.
Weijers, I. (1999). The double paradox of juvenile justice. European Journal on
Criminal Policy and Research, 7(3): 329–351.
Wendt, R. F. (1995). Women in positions of service: The politicized body.
Communication Studies, 46(3–4): 276–296.
Wendt, R. F. (1998). The sound of one hand clapping: counterintuitive lessons extracted
from paradoxes and double binds in participative organizations. Management
Communication Quarterly, 11(3): 323–371.
Westenholz, A. (1993). Paradoxical thinking and change in the frames of reference.
Organization Studies, 14(1): 37–58.
Whyte, W. H. (1956). The organization man. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Wicks, A. C., Berman, S. L., & Jones, T. M. (1999). The structure of optimal trust:
Moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 99–116.
Wickstead, E. (2019). Why Jacinda Ardern is a leader for our times. Vogue, 21 March.
Wiedemann, N., Cunha, M. P., & Clegg, S. (2019). Rethinking resistance as an act of
improvisation: Lessons from the 1914 Christmas truce. Organization studies. First
published 12 December 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619882957
Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: Managing culture in
modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4): 515.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account

References 161
Willmott, H. (2013). The substitution of one piece of nonsense for another: Reflections
on resistance, gaming, and subjugation. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3):
443–473.
Wittgenstein, L. (1964). Philosophical remarks. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Wohlleben, P. (2016). The hidden life of trees: What they feel, how they communicate—
discoveries from a secret world. Vancouver: Greystone Books.
Wolf, M. (2019). How to reform today’s rigged capitalism. Financial Times, 4
December, 13.
Woo, D., & McDermott, K. W. (2019). Portrayals of unethical and unvirtuous work-
place behaviors on TV: Implications for vocational anticipatory socialization.
International Journal of Communication, 13(19): 2859–2877.
Wood, G., & Hughes, S. (2015) (eds). The central contradiction of capitalism?
A collection of essays on capital in the twenty-first century. London, UK: Policy
Exchange.
World Economic Forum (2019). The universal purpose of a company in the Fourth
Industrial Revolution. Financial Times, 2 December, 5.
Worline, M. C. (2012). Courage in organizations: An integrative review of the “difficult
virtue”. In K. M. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (eds), The Oxford handbook of positive
organizational scholarship (pp. 304–315). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wray‐Bliss, E. (2003). Quick fixes, management culture and drug culture: Excellence
and ecstasy, BPR and brown. Culture and Organization, 9(3): 161–176.
Wray‐Bliss, E. (2012). Leadership and the deified/demonic: A cultural examination of
CEO sanctification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(4): 434–449.
Yan, H. K. (2009). A paradox of virtue: The Daodejing on virtue and moral philosophy.
Philosophy East and West, 59(2): 173–187.
Yi, S., Knudsen, T., & Becker, M. (2016). Inertia in routines: A hidden source of organ-
izational variation. Organization Science, 27(3): 782–800.
Yong, E. (2016). I contain multitudes: The microbes within us and a grander view of
life. London, UK: Bodley Head.
Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., et al. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors
in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management
Journal, 58(2): 538–566.
Zheng, W., Kark, R., & Meister, A. L. (2018). Paradox versus dilemma mindset:
A theory of how women leaders navigate the tensions between agency and commun-
ion. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5): 584–596.
Zorina, A., Belanger, F., Kumar, N., & Clegg, S. R. (2021). The Web of veillance:
Enacting visibility in the digital age. Organization Science.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at
the new frontier of power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
Marco Berti, Ace Simpson, Miguel P. Cunha, and Stewart R. Clegg -
9781839101144
Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 07/02/2024 11:30:24PM
via communal account