ArticlePDF Available

Design Criteria for Designing Sustainable Commercial Buildings in Hot and Arid Climate

Trans Tech Publications Ltd
Construction Technologies and Architecture
Authors:

Abstract

As climate change effect on our daily life is clear, and the awareness of greenhouse gases damages is increased, architects and many developers necessitate green and sustainable buildings design by focusing on energy efficiency, avoiding harmful materials, and taking care of indoor air quality to construct environmentally friend buildings. Also, adopting energy efficiency strategies and renewable energy applications in buildings design generally and particularly in commercial buildings will drop the produced amount of CO2 emissions, as well as operational emissions and embodied emissions are attributed to the building materials and energy required for construction.This research is proposing energy efficient commercial building design proposal as an approach to green architecture in Egypt. First, commercial buildings impact is studied, then choosing energy simulation tool to assess the solution as DesignBuilder software, the design of commercial building proposal respect the triple bottom line of sustainability, to introduce innovative, efficient and environmental building design respecting users’ needs and achieve high economic value, finally, after simulating the building model in DesignBuilder to reach the highest energy saving and ensure the thermal comfort for users, the design is evaluated by LEED criteria to measure the environmental impact of the building and indicate how this design is successful or not.Finally, this research focuses on proposing a design design cliteria and apply it on designing new commercial buildings to enhance the building performance and being environmentally integrated based on design design cliteria that represent the three major design principles and they are Nature, Culture and Art. Nature for respecting and integrating with the environment, Culture for respecting the location and user’s needs, Art for offering a unique architecture design leave strong mental image impression.
Design Criteria for Designing Sustainable Commercial Buildings in Hot
and Arid Climate
Hesham Helal, a, Rania F. Ismail2,b *
1Arch. Hesham Helal, CEO & Founder of Criteria Design Group, Egypt
2Rania Fouad Ismail, Assistant Professor at Matarya Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University,
Egypt
ah.helal@criteriadesigns.com, bdr.raniafouadismail@gmail.com*
Keywords: Commercial Building, Design Design cliteria, DesignBuilder, sustainable design,
Abstract
As climate change effect on our daily life is clear, and the awareness of greenhouse gases damages is
increased, architects and many developers necessitate green and sustainable buildings design by
focusing on energy efficiency, avoiding harmful materials, and taking care of indoor air quality to
construct environmentally friend buildings. Also, adopting energy efficiency strategies and renewable
energy applications in buildings design generally and particularly in commercial buildings will drop
the produced amount of CO2 emissions, as well as operational emissions and embodied emissions are
attributed to the building materials and energy required for construction.
This research is proposing energy efficient commercial building design proposal as an approach to
green architecture in Egypt. First, commercial buildings impact is studied, then choosing energy
simulation tool to assess the solution as DesignBuilder software, the design of commercial building
proposal respect the triple bottom line of sustainability, to introduce innovative, efficient and
environmental building design respecting users’ needs and achieve high economic value, finally, after
simulating the building model in DesignBuilder to reach the highest energy saving and ensure the
thermal comfort for users, the design is evaluated by LEED criteria to measure the environmental
impact of the building and indicate how this design is successful or not.
Finally, this research focuses on proposing a design design cliteria and apply it on designing new
commercial buildings to enhance the building performance and being environmentally integrated
based on design design cliteria that represent the three major design principles and they are Nature,
Culture and Art. Nature for respecting and integrating with the environment, Culture for respecting
the location and user’s needs, Art for offering a unique architecture design leave strong mental image
impression.
Introduction
As climate change effect on our daily life is clear, and the awareness of greenhouse gases damages is
increased, architects and many developers necessitate green and sustainable building design by
focusing on energy efficiency, avoiding harmful materials, and taking care of indoor air quality to
construct environmentally friend buildings. Also, adopting energy efficiency strategies and renewable
energy applications generally in buildings design and specially in commercial one will drop the
produced amount of CO2 emissions, as well as, operational emissions and embodied emissions are
attributed to the building materials and energy required for construction, will likely dominate new
building life cycle emissions by 2050. [1]
From this point of view, this research focuses on proposing a design proposal for new commercial
buildings and the ability to enhance the building performance to be environmentally integrated based
on design criteria represented in three major principles and they are Nature, Culture and Art.
Commercial buildings are not limited to stores, but also include offices, gymnasiums, libraries, clinics
and more. As indication of the augmenting of commercial buildings volume, in the U.S., 5.9 million
commercial buildings in 2018 an increase of 56% in number of buildings since 1979. Also,
commercial building floor space is expected to increase by 33% from 2020 to 2050 [2]. The typical
commercial buildings, energy efficiency measures can reduce energy consumption by 20-30% with
no significant design alterations. [3], [4]
Any sustainable building design especially public buildings like commercial or administrative
buildings must be evaluated by environmental rating system like LEED or BREAM or local rating
systems to assess the design effect on building users health and behaviors. Nowadays, there are many
environmental assessment tools have been developed to evaluate green building designs all over the
world. Internationally, LEED rating system (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is the
most widely used green building rating system in the world, as LEED provides a design cliteria for
healthy, efficient, carbon and cost-saving green buildings [5]. Locally, in Egypt, GPRS (Green
Pyramid Rating System) is a rating system for assessing buildings that will be new constructed, this
system was launched in 2011 by the green building Council in Egypt and US Green Building Council.
Also, there is another new Egyptian rating system named TASHEED was developed by Egypt Green
Building Council (EGBC) (a non-governmental organization called) with the goal of encouraging the
design and construction of sustainable buildings in Egypt. [6]
Research methodology
This research is proposing energy efficient commercial building design proposal for existing land as
an approach to green architecture in Egypt. First, commercial buildings impact is studied, then
choosing energy simulation tool to assess the solution, the design the commercial building proposal
with respect for triple bottom line of sustainability, to introduce efficient and environmental building
respecting users’ needs and achieve high economic value, finally, after simulating the building model
in DesignBuilder to reach the highest energy saving and ensure the thermal comfort for users, the
design is evaluated by LEED criteria to measure the environmental impact of the building and indicate
how this design is successful or not.
Commercial sustainable design
Studying and offering different design proposals for environmentally friend commercial buildings
that will be evaluated by environmental rating system is a must. Commercial buildings are a major
energy consumer building type, for example, they consumed 18% of all energy in the U.S. in 2020
and this energy consumption represents increase by 59% from 1980. [7]. In Egypt, over 55% of the
total electricity consumption is attributed to residential, commercial, and institutional buildings.
Artificial lighting is estimated to account for 36% of the electricity used in the commercial sector
during 2013 and 2014. A significant increase in electricity demand is expected over the next few
years with a growth rate of 6.8% [8]. This amount of energy consumption reflects on the produced
carbon dioxide (CO2) as in 2020 in the U.S. only, these commercial buildings emitted 718 million
metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), which represents approximately 16% of all U.S. CO2 emissions
that year because of fossil fuels consumption to provide energy.[9] . According to many studies, the
design, construction, operation, and demolition of commercial buildings impact natural resources,
environmental quality, worker productivity, and community well-being so it’s essential to integrate
appropriate environmental design cliteria in this building design. [10]
So, the proposed design in this research is focusing in designing low energy consumption commercial
building and the common areas are naturally ventilated as approach for sustainable building design
in Egypt.
Energy simulation as an architectural design tool
The ability to produce energy efficient design proposals within the architectural field is becoming a
requirement more than an option. [11]
As part of the development design strategy, an extensive simulation analysis is carried to determine
the most energy efficiency solution suitable for commercial building in this specific location. There
are more than one software to simulate building energy performance like DesignBuilder, Ecotect,
Revit Insight, and more. But the chosen one in this study is DesignBuilder because DesignBuilder
provides accurate energy, comfort, cost and daylighting performance data to help inform and guide
your design decisions in addition to the ability to simulate design CFD (Computational Fluid
Dynamic) [12].
Building Form and openings are considered one of the fundamental design features of energy-
efficient buildings. Unfortunately, integration of daylighting in commercial buildings is almost never
considered in Egypt but in this proposed design it is essential design factor.
Application case study
The research case study is design proposal for energy efficient commercial building that represents
an approach to green architecture in Egypt. First, commercial buildings impact is studied, then
choosing energy simulation tool to assess the solution as DesignBuilder software, the design of
commercial building proposal respect the triple bottom line of sustainability, to introduce innovative,
efficient and environmental building design respecting users’ needs and achieve high economic value,
finally, after simulating the building model in DesignBuilder to reach the highest energy saving and
ensure the thermal comfort for users, the design is evaluated by LEED criteria to measure the
environmental impact of the building and indicate how this design is successful or not.
This paper proposes a design cliteria for designing sustainable innovative commercial building design
in Egypt as shown in Figure 1 that site analysis is essential start, then design must achieve these three
main values (Culture Nature Art) by interacting with project location, users’ needs, market needs
and sustainability principals at the same time, also, it summarizes results of a detailed simulation
analysis to the building energy use and Co2 emission.
This study applies the proposed design cliteria in designing commercial building at Fifth settlement,
Cairo, Egypt where the climate known as hot and arid climate.
The project land area is 7000m2 and building footprint is 120%, project consist of ground and 3floors,
40% of project area at ground floor, 30% at first floor, 27% at second floor, and 23% at third floor.
Figure 1: Proposed design cliteria for sustainable commercial buildings, Source: Authors
5.1 Site analysis
Project site is analyzed to determine the advantages to integrate it in the design and the disadvantages
to avoid it or create a solution to deal with it. As, project sun path is studied, prevailing wind direction
is determined which represents main design factor and surrounded noise location as shown in Figure
2. The project land forms triangle shape and the total area is 7000m2 , and the tallest side located on
the main road.
Figure 2: Project Site analysis
5.2 Environmental Design concept development
In the design concept development stages, all the previous weather factors are considered in addition
to the values that needed to be considered in the design like aesthetic, environmental, cultural values.
Design concept steps are developed as shown in Figure 3. First, the design starts to interact with site
edges to create inner plaza, but the customers can interact with the main elevation only and the hole
project cannot be naturally ventilated. Second try achieved good natural ventilation to the project but
still project main façade separate customers form integration to the hole project. Third try concept
developed to degrade each floor mass to expand the opening and let the highest amount of prevailing
winds to flow in the project, also create wider vision angle for all the project units. The fourth and
last design development based on maximizing the prevailing wind flow through the project by
integrated 6 vertical courtyards, also these openings solved the problem of users’ visual integration
from inside or outside the project.
Figure 3: Environmental Design concept development, Source: Authors
5.3 Project Natural Ventilation study
The project is designed to maximize the benefits of prevailing wind and enhance hole project natural
ventilation, great semi-opened plaza and 6 vertical courtyards were distributed all over the project
mass to facilitate the wind flow as approach to reduce project energy consumption to the minimum.
Also, project elements are distributed to minimize the effect of solar radiation on the project to reduce
the mechanical loads that needed in cooling process, as approach to reduce total building energy
consumption. Corridors and services area are positioned in high solar radiation places to protect
project main elements. As shown in Figure 4 the plan is divided into 3 zones, at zone 1 and 2 all units
are oriented to north and service corridor located in south for zone 1 and located in west for zone 2
to enhance day lighting and reduce heat radiation on commercial and administrative units.
Zone 3 all units are oriented to main street view and building mass is degraded to create horizontal
shades to protect south façade.
Figure 4: ventilation study for each floor, Source: Authors
5.4 Project model environmental simulation
Phase 3 at the design concept is considered as environmental proposal but phase 4 is enhancement to
this environmental design, so phase 3 represents the basic model to simulate and phase 4 represents
the final proposed design, each model is constructed at DesignBuilder software as shown in Figure 5
and the results are compared to define the benefits.
Figure 5: Basic conceptual model and developed final model at DesignBuilder, Source: Authors
Simulations had been done to ensure that the design is ready to be LEED certified. Project design
increases energy efficiency in the hole building and ensures the highest possible indoor air quality
while maintaining the most cost-effective energy consumption levels which lead to less CO2 emission
and more efficient building.
As LEED certificate is effective tool for assessing the sustainability of a building design, construction,
and operational stages. This building design achieves all LEED prerequisites, and they are included
in the early design stage.
Results
Simulations had been done to ensure that the design is sustainable and ready to be LEED certified.
Project design increases energy efficiency in the hole building and ensures the highest possible indoor
air quality while maintaining the most cost-effective energy consumption levels which lead to less
CO2 emission and more efficient building.
After running the simulations for conceptual design phasis the final model is less in energy
consumption by 48%, adding vertical courtyards reduce cooling energy consumption from 858 MWh
to 456 MWh which means 46% energy saving, also, this resulting 40% reduction in Co2 building
production.
At the end, this paper represents a high-performance commercial building is a building that uses
whole-building design to achieve energy, economic, and environmentally sustainable performance.
Summary
This research is recommending follow the proposed design design cliteria to design sustainable
commercial buildings. The proposed design design cliteria for commercial buildings based on three
main values to respect and integrate in design (Culture Nature Art).
References
[1] Simonen, K. e.. Benchmarking the Embodied Carbon of Buildings.”. Technology|Architecture
Design, (2017) 208218.
[2] Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan.. Commercial Buildings Factsheet.
Michigan: Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, (September 2021) Pub. No.
CSS05-05.
[3] Kneifel, J.. Life-cycle carbon and cost analysis of energy efficiency measure in new commercial
buildings. Energy and Buildings, 42, (2010) 333-340.
[4] David Sundfors, M. B.. Sustainability metrics for commercial buildings in Sweden. Property
Management. (July 2018)
[5] USGBC. Retrieved from www.usgbc.org: https://www.usgbc.org/leed , last access (2022, august
7th ).
[6] Karmany, H. M.. Evaluation of green building rating systems for Egypt. American University in
Cairo. (2016)
[7] EIA, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) .
Buildings Energy Data Book. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy (EERE) . (Monthly Energy Review April 2021).
[8] Ahmed Osama Daoud, A. A. Overcoming the limitations of the green pyramid rating system in
the Egyptian construction industry: a critical analysis. Architectural Engineering and Design
Manage. ( August 2020).
[9] U.S. EIA. Annual Energy Outlook 2021. U.S. EIA . (2022)
[10] Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, Commercial Buildings Factsheet,
september2021, Pub No. CSS05-05
[11] Khaled Tarabieh, M. A. Teaching energy simulation in the architectural design studio: An
experimental approach. Engineering of Science and Military Technologies, Volume (2)( Issue (2)).
(2018). 1036.1043
[12] designbuilder. designbuilder. Retrieved from designbuilder.co.uk/:
https://designbuilder.co.uk/software/for-architects , last access (2022, November 22nd).
Conference Paper
This paper presents a unique design philosophy that concluded from the integration of environmental responsibility, financial prudence, and artistic expression in architectural design, it called the "Values Trilogy", it is a novel design philosophy. The Values Trilogy posits that sustainable design offers potential for long-term economic viability. It integrates sustainable practices throughout the design and construction process. Empirical evidence is provided through the application of the Values Trilogy to diverse building types and scales, encompassing educational, commercial, residential, and administrative projects and the result of each design is sustainable building well integrated with nature, satisfying social needs and achieve unique architecture footprint. The paper analyzes case studies demonstrating how this philosophy has achieved: sustainable integration of buildings within the natural environment, social responsiveness by addressing the needs and aspirations of building users, and unique architectural identity through cultivating a unique and memorable aesthetic expression. Also, it contributes to the scientific discourse by demonstrating design methodology led to sustainable design both environmentally responsible and financially advantageous in unique artistic expression. The Values Trilogy design philosophy aligns with global sustainability goals and presents a valuable framework for stakeholders, organizations, and decision-makers to consider when pursuing sustainable architecture. The undeniable influence of climate change on everyday life, coupled with a heightened awareness of the detrimental effects of greenhouse gas emissions (IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2021), has necessitated a paradigm shift in the construction industry. Architects and building sector developers are increasingly recognizing the crucial role of green and sustainable building design. This approach emphasizes energy efficiency, the elimination of harmful materials, and meticulous attention to indoor air quality, ultimately leading to the creation of environmentally responsible structures. Furthermore, the strategic adoption of energy-efficient measures and the integration of renewable energy sources within the design process, particularly for commercial buildings, offer a significant pathway towards curbing CO2 emissions. This multifaceted approach addresses not only operational emissions stemming from building energy consumption but also the embodied emissions associated with the materials and energy employed during construction. Research suggests that by 2050, embodied emissions are likely to surpass operational emissions, highlighting the critical need to prioritize sustainable practices throughout a building's life cycle. (Simonen, 2017) This paper introduces the Values Trilogy Design Philosophy, a novel approach that strives to seamlessly integrate these three crucial considerations (Culture-Nature-Art) within the architectural design process based on three pillars (Sustainability-Cost-Effectiveness-Artistic Expression). The Three Pillars are:-Sustainability: This pillar prioritizes the utilization of environmentally friendly materials, construction practices that minimize environmental impact, and the incorporation of renewable energy sources.-Cost-Effectiveness: Focuses on optimizing resource allocation, employing efficient construction methods, and minimizing waste to ensure the affordability of the built environment.-Artistic Expression: Recognizes the inherent value of aesthetics in design, aiming to create structures that are not only functional but also visually stimulating and emotionally engaging. Traditionally, architectural design has often prioritized one aspect over the others. Focusing solely on sustainability can result in cost-prohibitive projects, while prioritizing aesthetics can compromise environmental responsibility. Similarly, solely emphasizing cost-effectiveness may lead to the neglect of both environmental and aesthetic considerations.
Article
Full-text available
Despite the tangible contributions of the construction industry to social development and economic growth, it is known for its natural resources overconsumption and solid waste (SW) generation both of which have major negative impacts on the natural environment. In the particular case of materials waste, the construction industry worldwide accounts for about 50% of global annual generated SW. In addition, construction materials may contribute up to 50% of the total project cost. Accordingly, the negative implications of the construction industry have compelled many nations to develop green building rating systems in order to preserve the environment, promote the economic efficiency of using resources, and enhance the quality of citizens’ lives which are necessary aspects for achieving the triple bottom line (TBL) of sustainability. Recently, Egypt developed the Green Pyramid Rating System (GPRS) in its first version in 2011. Through investigating the GPRS and especially its Materials and Resources (M&R) category, some shortcomings were identified. Towards improving the GPRS, this paper aims to investigate the GPRS and compare it with its peers BREEAM and LEED with a special focus on M&R category. The investigation and comparison results helped proposing suggestions which may improve the GPRS on the categorical level and the criteria level of M&R category. Moreover, the importance of M&R category is demonstrated by a case study through using palm fronds as a green material for concrete reinforcement to prove the positive impact of this category on the TBL of sustainability.
Article
Full-text available
Green Pyramid Rating System “GPRS” was established in 2009, Yet sustainable architecture practices in Egypt does not shows constant steps of growth. This research discusses the reasons behind the negligence of implementing GPRS into projects as a sustainable design approach. The research intends to identify the gaps between the architectural curriculum’s and GPRS aspects. Research methods are divided into two parts the first part is a survey questionnaire targeting senior architecture students at Egyptian private universities and public universities, as well as experienced architects in order to determine their level of awareness toward the aspects of the GPRS. While the second method presents a relation matrix that identifies the gaps between GPRS aspects and architecture curriculum in high educational facilities. The study revealed that energy efficiency, materials and resources are the most covered aspects in Egyptian curriculums while Management and Innovation are not well covered in Egyptian high educational facilities. Keywords: Egypt, Green Pyramid Rating Systems, Architecture curriculum, High Educational Institutions
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Environmental rating systems typically focus on building characteristics at a specific point in time; but from investment and valuation perspectives, actual performance over time should be the most important thing. Newly constructed commercial buildings today usually come with a high degree of technically advanced installations and a wide range of monitoring possibilities. This provides us with the possibility of monitoring a building’s in-use performance. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how frontrunners in the Swedish green building market actually monitor their new buildings, and look for similarities in that area. Design/methodology/approach By investigating a selected case study, conducting a survey and follow-up interviews among Swedish real estate companies and finally studying the available industry information, this paper considers what key performance indicators real estate developers choose to monitor as well as how they go about collecting and using the data. By doing this, we can get an idea of what is already monitored and to what extent. The case study also provides an insight into what is technologically possible. Findings A comparison of the gathered data from this study is then made with information that investors and property valuers would be expected to be interested in. The results show that these data are, to a large extent, information that the frontrunners already gather, but it is not made publicly available. One area where important information is lacking, however, is data about indoor climate. Research limitations/implications The study is solely focussed on commercial buildings in Sweden and also on real estate owners with a high sustainability profile. Originality/value This paper presents a starting point in introducing the research area of the continued sustainability performance of our built environment. In order to understand and improve the environmental performance over time of our buildings and the connection to potential value, it is important to know what we can and should monitor.
Article
Full-text available
Greenhouse gas emissions from extracting and manufacturing building materials, often termed “embodied carbon,” are produced before buildings are occupied and are more critical to meeting global climate targets than commonly assumed. In order to motivate reductions in embodied carbon, we need better data and established benchmarks. Although Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods have been used to analyze individual buildings, there has not been an agreed-upon understanding of the order magnitude and range of variation of the embodied carbon of buildings. In order to address this knowledge gap, the largest known database of building embodied carbon was compiled, normalized, and analyzed. In addition to establishing the range of embodied carbon values, this research identified sources of uncertainty and proposed strategies to advance embodied carbon benchmarking practice.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter reviews passive design strategies and the benefits of using such strategies not only in the building design but also related to the urban context and human factors, which would be linked to urban sustainable design, policies and strategies. The key to designing a passive building is by taking advantage of the local climate (micro-climate) and therefore, climate characteristics and classification can help with identifying approaches as early as site planning and analysis. Therefore, climate and comfort are the two fundamental measures in passive design that require attention. Passive design is a major part of environmental design, and approaches utilising several techniques and strategies that can be employed to the buildings in all types of climates around the world such as orientation, ventilation, shading devices, thermal mass, insulation, daylighting and so on. These techniques and strategies can also be supported by various other parameters such as using technologies (passive and/or active) and customisable controls as well as enhanced by patterns of biophilic design for improving health and well-being in the built environment. There are also passive solar technologies including direct and indirect solar gains for space heating, solar water heating systems, solar cookers, use of thermal mass and phase-change materials for slowing indoor air temperature swings, solar chimney for enhancing natural ventilation, and earth sheltering that can be considered as part of the actual design. Today, passive design strategies can be easily evaluated with the use of either simple or more sophisticated Building Performance Simulation (BPS) tools such as Ecotect, IES VE, etc.
Thesis
The average life of most structural types of buildings is fifty years. This projected lifespan will accordingly have an impact not only on the current inhabitants but also on the future generations. Therefore, nowadays, the subject of environmental conditions, and how our actions affect it, is of considerable consideration.
Article
Energy efficiency in new building construction has become a key target to lower nation-wide energy use. The goals of this paper are to estimate life-cycle energy savings, carbon emission reduction, and cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency measures in new commercial buildings using an integrated design approach, and estimate the implications from a cost on energy-based carbon emissions. A total of 576 energy simulations are run for 12 prototypical buildings in 16 cities, with 3 building designs for each building-location combination. Simulated energy consumption and building cost databases are used to determine the life-cycle cost-effectiveness and carbon emissions of each design. The results show conventional energy efficiency technologies can be used to decrease energy use in new commercial buildings by 20–30% on average and up to over 40% for some building types and locations. These reductions can often be done at negative life-cycle costs because the improved efficiencies allow the installation of smaller, cheaper HVAC equipment. These improvements not only save money and energy, but reduce a building’s carbon footprint by 16% on average. A cost on carbon emissions from energy use increases the return on energy efficiency investments because energy is more expensive, making some cost-ineffective projects economically feasible.