ArticlePDF Available

A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN APACHE II AND RANSON’S SCORING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTING THE SEVERITY OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to compare the Ranson’s scoring system with APACHE II score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. Methods: 50 cases having acute pancreatitis were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Institutional ethical committee was approved the study. The duration of study was 2 years. Informed consent was obtained from the patients. Assessment of severity of pancreatitis was done on the basis of Ranson’s scoring as well as APACHE II score. Final severity score of the patients on the basis of both the scoring systems was assessed to determine the efficacy of each scoring system in predicting the severity. Results: Out of these 50 cases, there were 37 (74%) males and 13 (26%) females. The mean age of affected cases was found to be 36.86±7.91 years. The most common etiological factor was chronic alcoholism which was seen in 22 (44%) patients followed by biliary tract disease or stones (24%), hypertriglyceridemia (14%), post ERCP (2%), idiopathic (14%), and autoimmune pancreatitis (2%). Mild and severe pancreatitis was seen in 35 (70%) and 15 (30%), respectively. APACHE II score was found to be having more sensitivity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of severe pancreatitis as compared to Ranson’s score. There was no significant difference in specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy as determined by Ranson’s and APACHE II Score. Conclusion: APACHE II score is better in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis as it is found to have a better sensitivity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of severe pancreatitis as compared to Ranson’s score.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Vol 16, Issue 6, 2023
Online - 2455-3891
Print - 0974-2441
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN APACHE II AND RANSON’S SCORING SYSTEMS IN
PREDICTING THE SEVERITY OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS
MANOHAR KADAM1*, DHARMENDRASINH GOHIL2
Received: 02 April 2023, Revised and Accepted: 15 May 2023
ABSTRACT
Methods: 50 cases having acute pancreatitis were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Institutional
ethical committee was approved the study. The duration of study was 2 years. Informed consent was obtained from the patients. Assessment of
severity of pancreatitis was done on the basis of Ranson’s scoring as well as APACHE II score. Final severity score of the patients on the basis of both
the scoring systems was assessed to determine the efficacy of each scoring system in predicting the severity.
Results: Out of these 50 cases, there were 37 (74%) males and 13 (26%) females. The mean age of affected cases was found to be 36.86±7.91 years.
The most common etiological factor was chronic alcoholism which was seen in 22 (44%) patients followed by biliary tract disease or stones (24%),
hypertriglyceridemia (14%), post ERCP (2%), idiopathic (14%), and autoimmune pancreatitis (2%). Mild and severe pancreatitis was seen in
35 (70%) and 15 (30%), respectively. APACHE II score was found to be having more sensitivity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of severe
pancreatitis as compared to Ranson’s score. There was no significant difference in specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy as determined
by Ranson’s and APACHE II Score.
Conclusion: APACHE II score is better in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis as it is found to have a better sensitivity and positive predictive value
for the diagnosis of severe pancreatitis as compared to Ranson’s score.
Keywords: Acute pancreatitis, Ranson’s, APACHE II score, Complications, Sensitivity.
INTRODUCTION
Acute pancreatitis can be defined as inflammation of pancreatic
parenchyma as well as surrounding peri-pancreatic tissue. It
is one of the leading causes of gastrointestinal system-related
morbidity as well as mortality in surgical practice. The pre-disposing
factors for development of pancreatitis include cholelithiasis,
hypertriglyceridemia, chronic alcoholism, trauma, and viral infections
such as cytomegalovirus, mums, and Epstein–Bar virus. Drug-induced
pancreatitis can be secondary to the drugs such as azathioprine,
sulfonamides, tetracycline, and didanosine. The less common causes
include autoimmune pancreatitis, neoplastic diseases, and procedures
such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [1].
Acute pancreatitis usually presents as dull abdominal pain which
gradually increases in severity and is usually associated with nausea
vomiting as well as anorexia. The abdominal pain in pancreatitis
characteristically reduces upon sitting but this improvement is usually
temporary and there is gradual worsening of abdominal pain [2]. Unless
it is diagnosed early and appropriately managed acute pancreatitis has
the potential to culminate into catastrophic complications such as shock
multi-organ dysfunction that may eventually cause death. According to
the severity, acute pancreatitis is divided into mild acute pancreatitis
(absence of organ failure and local or systemic complications,
moderately acute pancreatitis (no organ failure or transient organ
failure <48 h with or without local complications) and severe acute
pancreatitis (persistent organ failure more than 48 h that may involve
one or multiple organs) [3].
Since in many cases, abdominal pain initially is dull and bearable and
many times associated with nausea, vomiting as well as diarrhea, it
may be attributed to other gastrointestinal diseases and a high index
of suspicion, particularly in individuals known to have risk factors for
development of acute pancreatitis, is essential for early diagnosis of
acute pancreatitis [4]. Serum amylase and lipase levels are increased
in cases with acute pancreatitis, however, these enzymes are non-
specific and cannot be relied upon for the diagnosis. The diagnosis of
pancreatitis is usually confirmed on the basis of imaging techniques
such as ultrasound imaging, computed tomography, and in selected
cases, magnetic resonance imaging can be done [5]. In cases of acute
pancreatitis, on ultrasound, pancreas usually appears to be having
heterogeneous echotexture with decreased echogenicity and presence
of peripancreatic fluid collection. Ultrasound examination, however,
is having less sensitivity particularly in obese and non-cooperative
patients. On computerized tomography, acute pancreatitis may present
as diffusely enlarged pancreas with indistinct margins and surrounding
fat stranding. On MRI diffusion-weighted images, it may present as
hyperintense signal of the involved parenchyma [6].
Identification of severity is one of the essential parts of management
of patients with acute pancreatitis and is essential in further guiding
management strategies in cases of pancreatitis [7]. Several scoring
system, such as APACHE II, Ranson’s score bedside index for severity
in acute pancreatitis (BISAP), and modified Glasgow score, is in use for
the assessment of severity. Out of these scores, APACHE II and Ranson’s
score are more commonly used for the assessment of severity in cases
of acute pancreatitis [8].
We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of APACHE II and
Ranson’s score in the assessment of severity of cases having acute
pancreatitis.
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023v16i6.48438. Journal homepage: https://innovareacademics.in/journals/index.php/ajpcr
Research Article
1Department of General Surgery, Vedanta Institute of Medical Sciences, Dhundalwadi, Maharashtra, India. 2Department of General
Surgery, PDU Medical College and Hospital, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. Email: drmanoharka93@gmail.com
Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to compare the Ranson’s scoring system with APACHE II score in predicting the
severity of acute pancreatitis.
173
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 16, Issue 6, 2023, 172-175
Kadam and Gohil
METHODS
This was a comparative study conducted in the department of general
surgery of PDU Medical College and Hospital of Saurashtra University
to compare the RANSON scoring system with APACHE II score in
predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. 50 patients diagnosed to
be having acute pancreatitis were included in this study on the basis
of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Institutional ethical
committee approved the study. The duration of study was 2 years.
Informed and written consent was obtained from the patients before
enrolling them in the study.
Sample size calculation was calculated on the basis of pilot studies done
for analyzing cases of acute pancreatitis. Keeping power (1-Beta error) at
80% and confidence interval (1-alpha error) at 95%, the minimum sample
size required was 40 patients; therefore, we included 50 cases in this study.
A detailed history was taken in all the cases particularly with respect to
predisposing factors such as alcohol intake, cholelithiasis, and drug intake
for the development of pancreatitis. A thorough clinical examination
was done in all the cases. Routine investigations such as complete blood
count, renal function tests, hepatic function test, and coagulation profile
was done in all cases. Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was made on the
basis Atlanta criteria that consisted of acute abdominal pain suggestive
of pancreatitis along with either serum amylase or lipase level >3 times
the upper normal value or characteristic imaging findings. Imaging
studies consisted of ultrasound as well as computerized tomography. In
addition to the diagnosis of pancreatitis, imaging also was used for the
detection of biliary causes of pancreatitis such as cholelithiasis and/or
choledocholithiasis. Acute pancreatitis was classified as alcohol related
when the patient reported a regular higher intake of alcohol or an alcoholic
binge directly before the onset of the disease and no signs of possible
other causes will be found like gall stones pancreatitis. The cases were
classified as severe pancreatitis if there was presence of multiorgan failure
or complications such as hypotension and shock (systolic BP <90 mmHg),
pulmonary insufficiency (PaO2 60 mmHg or less), renal failure (serum
creatinine >2 mg), or gastrointestinal bleeding (>500 mL/24 h).
Assessment of severity of pancreatitis was done on the basis of Ranson’s
scoring [9] as well as APACHE II score [10]. Final severity score of
the patients on the basis of both the scoring systems was assessed to
determine the efficacy of each scoring system in predicting the severity.
For statistical purposes, SSPS 21.0 software was used. Sensitivity,
specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were
calculated. p<0.05 was taken as statistically significant.
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients admitted and diagnosed to be having acute pancreatitis on
the basis of imaging
2. Age above 20 years
3. Patients who gave informed written consent to be part of study.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patient who refused consent to be part of study
2. Known cases of chronic pancreatitis
3. Recurrence of acute pancreatitis
4. Patients with severe comorbid conditions such as uncontrolled
diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, and severe systemic
autoimmune conditions.
RESULTS
Total 50 patients were studied. Out of these 50 cases, there were
37 (74%) males and 13 (26%) females. There was a male preponderance
with an M: F ratio being 1:0.35 (Fig. 1).
The analysis of patients on the basis of age group showed that the
most common affected age group was between 31 and 40 (42%)
years followed by 41–50 (36%) years and 20–30 years (16%). 3 (6%)
patients were above 50 years of age. The mean age of affected cases was
found to be 36.86±7.91 years (Table 1).
The analysis of predisposing factors for the development of pancreatitis
showed that the most common etiological factor was chronic alcoholism
which was seen in 22 (44%) patients followed by biliary tract disease or
stones (24%), hypertriglyceridemia (14%), post-ERCP (2%), idiopathic
(14%), and autoimmune pancreatitis (2%) (Fig. 2).
The analysis of patients on the basis of severity showed that out of
50 studied cases, mild and severe pancreatitis was seen in 35 (70%)
and 15 (30%), respectively. Most common age group to be affected by
severe pancreatitis was between 31 and 40 years (12%) followed by
31–40 years (10%). Only 1 patient (2%) above 50 years was found to
be above 50 years of age (Table 2).
The analysis of patients on the basis of clinical classification showed
that 15 (30%) were having severe pancreatitis. 9 (18%) and 13 (26%)
patients were found to be having severe pancreatitis as assessed by
Ranson’s and APACHE II score, respectively (Table 3).
The analysis of severity of pancreatitis as assessed by Ranson’s score
as well as APACHE II score showed that the sensitivity of Ranson’s
and APACHE II score for the diagnosis of severe pancreatitis was 60%
Fig. 1: Gender distribution of the studied cases
Table 1: Gender‑wise distribution of age in studied cases
Age Male Female
No of
cases
Percentage No of
cases
Percentage
20–30 years 5 10 3 6
31–40 years 16 32 5 10
41–50 years 14 28 4 8
Above 50 years 2 4 1 2
Total 37 74% 13 26
Mean age=36.86±7.91 years
Fig. 2: Predisposing factors for the acute pancreatitis
174
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 16, Issue 6, 2023, 172-175
Kadam and Gohil
Table 2: Severity of pancreatitis in studied cases
Age Mild pancreatitis Severe pancreatitis
No of
cases
Percentage No of
cases
Percentage
20–30 years 5 10.00 3 6.00
31–40 years 15 30.00 6 12.00
41–50 years 13 26.00 5 10.00
Above 50 years 2 4.00 1 2.00
Total 35 70 15 30.00
Table 3: Assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis by
Ranson’s and APACHE II score
Severity of pancreatitis No of cases Percentage
Clinical
Mild pancreatitis 35 70
Severe pancreatitis (multiorgan
dysfunction, respiratory failure, renal
failure, or significant GI bleeding)
15 30
Ranson’s score
<3 41 76
≥3 9 24
APACHE II scoring system
<8 37 74
≥8 13 26
Fig. 3: Complication in studied cases
and 80%, respectively. APACHE II score was found to be having more
sensitivity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of severe
pancreatitis as compared to Ranson’s score. There was no significant
difference in specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy as
determined by Ranson’s and APACHE II score (Table 4).
The analysis of complications in the studied cases showed that out of 50
studied cases, complications were seen in 11 (22%) patients. The most
common complication was found to be local peripancreatic collection
which was seen in 3 (6%) patients. The other complications included
biliary obstruction (4%), respiratory failure (4%), and multiorgan
dysfunction (6%). Renal failure was seen in 1 (2%) patient (Fig. 3).
DISCUSSION
We conducted this study to compare Ranson’s and APACHE II scores
in the assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis. Total 50 patients
admitted with acute pancreatitis were included in this study on the basis
of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. In our study, there were
37 (74%) males and 13 (26 %) females. There was a male preponderance
with an M: F ratio being 1:0.35. The most common affected age group
was found to be 31–40 years and the mean age was found to be
36.86±7.91 years. Ramu et al. conducted a study of patients with acute
pancreatitis [11]. In this study, out of 436 cases, 318 (72.9%) were males
and 118 (27.1%) were females. The mean age of studied cases was found
to be s 43.45 years (median 41 years). Similar male preponderance was
also reported by the authors such as Panda et al. [12] and Satoh et al. [13].
In our study, chronic alcoholism (44%) followed by biliary tract
disease or stones (24%), hypertriglyceridemia (14%), post-ERCP (2%),
idiopathic (14%), and autoimmune pancreatitis (2%) were common
predisposing factors for the development of acute pancreatitis.
Prasad and Nagarjuna conducted a study of 40 patients with acute
pancreatitis [14]. The common predisposing factors for pancreatitis in
this study were found to be biliary causes (55%) followed by alcoholism
(32.5%), idiopathic pancreatitis (7.5%), hyperlipidemia (2.5%), and
traumatic (2.5%) pancreatitis. Similar to our study, alcoholism and
biliary tract diseases were most common causes of acute pancreatitis
in this study. Similar predisposing factors were also reported to be the
authors such as Spicák [15] and Weiss et al. [16].
The most common complication was found to be local peripancreatic
collection which was seen in 3 (6%) patients. The other complications
included biliary obstruction (4%), respiratory failure (4%), and
multiorgan dysfunction (6%). Renal failure was seen in 1 (2%) patient.
In our study, complications were seen in 11 (22%) patients. Sonawane
et al. conducted a study of 53 patients with pancreatitis [17]. In this
study, 12 (22.6%) patients developed complications, 3(5.66%) had
acute fluid collections, 2(3.77%) had pseudocyst, 8(15.1%) had ascites,
9(16.98%) had pleural effusion, 2 (3.77%) had pancreatic necrosis,
1 (1.89%) had superior mesenteric vein thrombosis, 1 (1.89%) had GI
bleed, and 5 (9.43%) had organ failure. The complication rate in this
study was found to be comparable to our study.
The analysis of severity of pancreatitis as assessed by Ranson’s score
as well as APACHE II score showed that the sensitivity of Ranson’s
and APACHE II score for the diagnosis of severe pancreatitis was 60%
and 80%, respectively. APACHE II score was found to be having more
sensitivity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of severe
pancreatitis as compared to Ranson’s score. There was no significant
difference in specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy
as determined by Ranson’s and APACHE II score. In a prospective
study, Malathy and Sundarapandian enrolled 50 patients with acute
pancreatitis [18]. Severity of pancreatitis in these cases was assessed
by APACHE II and Ranson’s scores. The study found that an APACHE II
score of ≥10 on admission predicted a complicated outcome in patients
with acute pancreatitis with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 80%,
positive predictive value of 62%, and negative predictive value of 100%.
Scores below 10 predicted an uncomplicated outcome. On the basis of
these findings, the authors concluded that APACHE II score was a better
predictor of systemic complications (sensitivity 100%) than RANSON
score (sensitivity 66.7%). These findings were similar to our study.
Similar superiority of APACHE II score in assessment of severity of
acute pancreatitis was also reported by the authors such as Kumar and
Griwan [19] and Khanna et al. [20].
Table 4: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in studied cases
Ranson’s score 60.00 94.24 81.82 84.62 84
APACHE II score 80.00 97.14 92.31 91.89 92
p-value 0.003 (significant) 0.49 (not significant) 0.049 (significant) 0.14 (not significant) 0.12 (not significant)
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive predictive value (%) Negative predictive value (%) Accuracy (%)
175
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 16, Issue 6, 2023, 172-175
Kadam and Gohil
Limitation of the study
Relatively small number of cases is one of the important limitations of
this study. A large randomized control trial will further substantiate
the findings of this study. Moreover, the cases were not followed up for
prolonged period of time to assess long-term complications such as
pseudocyst formation.
CONCLUSION
APACHE II is found to be better in assessment of cases with acute
pancreatitis as it is found to have a better sensitivity and positive
predictive value for the diagnosis of severe pancreatitis as compared
to Ranson’s score.
WORK ATTRIBUTED TO
Department of General Surgery, PDU Medical College and Hospital,
Rajkot.
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION
MK – Concept and design of the study, prepared first draft of manuscript;
DG – Interpreted the results, reviewed the literature, and manuscript
preparation and revision of the manuscript.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
REFERENCES
1. Wang GJ, Gao CF, Wei D, Wang C, Ding SQ. Acute pancreatitis: Etiology
and common pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:1427-30.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1427.
2. Cappell MS. Acute pancreatitis: Etiology, clinical presentation,
diagnosis, and therapy. Med Clin North Am 2008;92:889-923, ix-x.
doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2008.04.013.
3. Lee DW, Cho CM. Predicting severity of acute pancreatitis. Medicina
(Kaunas) 2022;58:787. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060787.
4. Haas S, Singer MV. Differential diagnosis and therapy of acute
pancreatitis. Praxis (Bern 1994) 2002;91:1595-602. German.
doi: 10.1024/0369-8394.91.39.1595.
5. Busireddy KK, AlObaidy M, Ramalho M, Kalubowila J, Baodong L,
Santagostino I, et al. Pancreatitis-imaging approach. World J
Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2014;5:252-70. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i3.252.
6. Sandrasegaran K, Heller MT, Panda A, Shetty A, Menias CO. MRI in
acute pancreatitis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020;45:1232-42. doi: 10.1007/
s00261-019-02141-w.
7. Staubli SM, Oertli D, Nebiker CA. Laboratory markers predicting
severity of acute pancreatitis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2015;52:273-83.
doi: 10.3109/10408363.2015.1051659.
8. Venkatesh NR, Vijayakumar C, Balasubramaniyan G, Chinnakkulam
Kandhasamy S, Sundaramurthi S, Sreenath GS, et al. Comparison of
different scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis:
A prospective observational study. Cureus 2020;12:e6943. doi: 10.7759/
cureus.6943.
9. Basit H, Ruan GJ, Mukherjee S. Ranson criteria. In: StatPearls. Treasure
Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
10. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II:
A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818-29.
11. Ramu R, Paul V, Devipriya S, Philip NC. Etiology, clinical profile and
outcome of acute pancreatitis in a tertiary care teaching hospital in rural
South India: A ten year retrospective study. Int Surg J 2019;6:3794-9.
12. Panda S, Tirkey R, Swain BM, Jena S, Sarangi AK, Sarangi A. Acute
pancreatitis, its diagnosis with special reference to contrast enhanced
CT scan (CECT) and serum enzyme studies: A comparative study in
tertiary referral hospital of Odisha, India. Int Surg J 2017;4:4022-8.
13. Satoh K, Shimosegawa T, Masamune A, Hirota M, Kikuta K, Kihara Y,
et al., Research Committee of Intractable Diseases of the Pancreas.
Nationwide epidemiological survey of acute pancreatitis in Japan.
Pancreas 2011;40:503-7. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318214812b.
14. Prasad HL, Nagarjuna TR. Clinical profile of patients with acute
pancreatitis. Int J Res Med Sci 2016;4:2994-7.
15. Spicák J. Etiological factors of acute pancreatitis. Vnitr Lek
2002;48:829-41.
16. Weiss FU, Laemmerhirt F, Lerch MM. Etiology and risk factors
of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Visc Med 2019;35:73-81.
doi: 10.1159/000499138. Epub 2019 Mar 13. PMID: 31192240
17. Sonawane B, Kshirsagar S, Phadke N Study of clinical presentation and
management of acute pancreatitis at a tertiary hospital. MedPulse Int J
Surg 2021;20:81-4.
18. Malathy D, Sundarapandian R. A comparative study between apache
ii and Ranson scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute
pancreatitis. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2018;5:1013-6. DOI: 10.18410/
jebmh/2018/208
19. Kumar AH, Griwan MS. A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson’s
score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis
based on the 2012 revised Atlanta classification. Gastroenterol Rep
(Oxf) 2018;6:127-31. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gox029.
20. Khanna AK, Meher S, Prakash S, Tiwary SK, Singh U, Srivastava A, et al.
Comparison of Ranson, Glasgow, MOSS, SIRS, BISAP, APACHE II,
CTSI Scores, IL-6, CRP and Procalcitonin in predicting severity, organ
failure, pancreatic necrosis, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. HPB
Surg 2013;2013:367581.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Acute pancreatitis has a diverse etiology and natural history, and some patients have severe complications with a high risk of mortality. The prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis should be achieved by a careful ongoing clinical assessment coupled with the use of a multiple-factor scoring system and imaging studies. Over the past 40 years, various scoring systems have been suggested to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis. However, there is no definite and ideal scoring system with a high sensitivity and specificity. The interest in new biological markers and predictive models for identifying severe acute pancreatitis testifies to the continued clinical importance of early severity prediction. Although contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing pancreatic necrosis, early scanning for the prediction of severity is limited because the full extent of pancreatic necrosis may not develop within the first 48 h of presentation. This article provides an overview of the available scoring systems and biochemical markers for predicting severe acute pancreatitis, with a focus on their characteristics and limitations.
Article
Full-text available
Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory condition of the pancreas mostly due to alcohol or gallstones. Various scoring systems were involved in identifying the severity of the disease. The standard single score to identifying the severity remains uncertain. Methodology This prospective observational study was carried out for two years in a tertiary care center from South India. The diagnosis of AP was made based on Atlanta criteria, and a total of 164 patients were included. All patients were assessed by acute physiology and chronic health evaluation ll (APACHE II), bedside index for severity in AP (BISAP), modified Glasgow score (MGS), and Ranson score on admission and 48 hours after admission scores. Procalcitonin was done in all patients with AP. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen was done in 69 patients who had features of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were calculated for each score, and procalcitonin for CT documented severe patients and organ failure patients together. Results A total of 164 patients were included in this study. CT abdomen showed a modified CT severity index (MCSI) ≥8 in all 69 (100%) patients. APACHE II score could predict SAP based on CT findings in 44 patients (63.76%), BISAP score in 22 patients (31.88%), MGS in 55 patients (79.71%), Ranson score at admission in 31 patients (44.92%), Ranson score 48 hours after admission in 44 patients (63.76%), and procalcitonin on admission in 69 patients (100%) when cut-off used as per the literature. APACHE II score could predict SAP in cases of AP (n=164) in 52 patients (50%), BISAP score in 27 patients (26%), MGS in 79 patients (76%), Ranson score at admission in 34 patients (33%), and Ranson score 48 hours after admission in 61 (59%) patients when cut-off was used as per the literature. This study demonstrated that Ranson score on admission had a good area under the curve (AUC). AUC (0.8483), APACHE II (AUC 0.7708), and Ranson score 48 hours after admission (AUC 0.8167) had a fair accuracy. BISAP (AUC 0.6399) and MGS (AUC 0.6486) had poor accuracy for the prediction of severity in AP based on receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Conclusion Among the scoring system compared, MGS had the highest sensitivity for predicting the severity of AP. However, Ranson score on admission had better diagnostic accuracy for predicting severity, organ failure, and mortality based on ROC curves. Procalcitonin had the best sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy for association with severity in AP.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Acute pancreatitis is a complex condition with diverse local and systemic complications, dealt by the surgeons all over the world. There were no previous detailed studies regarding the etiology, clinical profile and outcome of acute pancreatitis in rural Kerala.Methods: This is a hospital based study by retrospective chart analysis of all acute pancreatitis cases from the past 10 years in this tertiary care centre which have clinical/ laboratory/ radiological findings suggestive of acute pancreatitis.Results: Among 436 cases studied 318 (72.9%) were males and 118 (27.1%) were females. Epigastric pain without radiation to the back (51.6%) was the most common clinical presentation. Alcohol was the most common etiological factor seen in 42.4% followed by idiopathic pancreatitis (IP) (36.9% cases) and then by gallstone/biliary pancreatitis (14.5%). Acute fluid collection was the most common local complication seen in 29.1% cases and respiratory system involvement was the most common organ involvement seen in 16.5% of cases.Conclusions: Epigastric pain without radiation to the back was the most common clinical presentation. Incidence of alcoholic pancreatitis (42.4%) and idiopathic pancreatitis (36.9%) was slightly higher in our study, which should prompt us to look with further studies for identifiable new aetiologies in the idiopathic group. This work provides the first known regional description of the etiology, clinical profile and outcome of acute pancreatitis. Due to institutional and population similarities, this may represent the status of developing countries in general. This will help in formulating a hospital policy which would be beneficial.
Article
Full-text available
Computed tomography (CT) is the most commonly performed imaging test for acute pancreatitis. Nevertheless, magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging is useful in many specific situations. These include evaluating patients with acute pancreatitis who cannot receive iodinated CT contrast, elucidating the underlying cause of acute pancreatitis, assessing ductal disconnection and for guiding intervention of necrotic collections. Non-contrast MRI is superior to non-contrast CT and MRI for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. We discuss these specific uses of MRI in acute pancreatitis. We highlight the future advances in MRI including faster, free-breathing scans that allow MRI to be completed within 10 min.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Our aim was to prospectively compare the Accuracy of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), Ranson’s score and modified Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI) in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on Atlanta 2012 definitions in a tertiary care hospital in northern India. Methods Fifty patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our hospital during the period of March 2015 to September 2016 were included in the study. APACHE II, BISAP and Ranson’s score were calculated for all the cases. Modified CTSI was also determined based on a pancreatic protocol contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CT). Optimal cut-offs for these scoring systems and the area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated based on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and these scoring systems were compared prospectively. Results Of the 50 cases, 14 were graded as severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic necrosis was present in 15 patients, while 14 developed persistent organ failure and 14 needed intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The AUC for modified CTSI was consistently the highest for predicting severe acute pancreatitis (0.919), pancreatic necrosis (0.993), organ failure (0.893) and ICU admission (0.993). APACHE II was the second most accurate in predicting severe acute pancreatitis (AUC 0.834) and organ failure (0.831). APACHE II had a high sensitivity for predicting pancreatic necrosis (93.33%), organ failure (92.86%) and ICU admission (92.31%), and also had a high negative predictive value for predicting pancreatic necrosis (96.15%), organ failure (96.15%) and ICU admission (95.83%). Conclusion APACHE II is a useful prognostic scoring system for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis and can be a crucial aid in determining the group of patients that have a high chance of need for tertiary care during the course of their illness and therefore need early resuscitation and prompt referral, especially in resource-limited developing countries.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Acute pancreatitis is sudden swelling and inflammation of the pancreas. It can be diagnosed on the basis of clinical and laboratory data. At times, it may be difficult to differentiate it from other acute abdominal conditions. In these patients, serum enzymes (amylase and lipase) study, imaging by ultrasonography (USG) and/or computed tomography (CT) is of immense value in arriving at a diagnosis. In this study, we have compared the role of serum enzymes (amylase and lipase) levels, with the imaging studies (US/CECT scan) in relation to early diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and to find out the most specific and sensitive diagnostic modality.Methods: 300 patients (220 males, 80 females) in age group of 21 to 62 years with a clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, which were admitted to surgical ward of S.C.B. Medical College Hospital, Cuttack during a period from November 2013 to October 2015, were included in the study. All selected cases (clinically diagnosed as acute pancreatitis) were serially subjected to tests of serum amylase and lipase estimation, USG and CECT scan of abdomen.Results: In our study the most common cause found was gall stone disease followed by chronic alcoholism. Serum amylase test showed diagnostic accuracy of 46.66% whereas serum lipase it was 70 %. Further USG of abdomen diagnostic accuracy was 83.33%, finally CECT scan had a diagnostic accuracy of 93.33%.Conclusions: Comparing all the diagnostic modalities described above it was found that contrast enhanced CT scan has highest accuracy rate (i.e. about 93% in our study) in detecting acute pancreatitis. This study proved that CECT scan was very important in the following up of the patients in order to detecting regression of disease appearance and complication in relation to acute pancreatitis.
Article
Based on the recognition of common etiological and genetic risk factors, acute and chronic pancreatitis are increasingly regarded as a continuum of the same disease, with a significant overlap of clinical manifestations and phenotypes but distinct morphological and imaging appearances. Recent population-based and cohort studies have found that tobacco smoke conveys a greater risk than immoderate alcohol consumption for the development of chronic pancreatitis, and hypertriglyceridemia has been identified as a risk factor for acute pancreatitis – even when plasma levels are only mildly elevated. Hereditary pancreatitis, in its autosomal dominant form, is associated with mutations in the cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1), whereas a number of germline variations in other genes have been found to represent risk factors for chronic as well as acute pancreatitis. For now, most of these involve the pancreatic digestive protease/antiprotease system. Oftentimes, affected patients are burdened with multiple or accumulating risk factors, and genetic traits when combined with environmental toxins compound the chance of developing the disease. Determining the underlying etiology of pancreatitis is worth the effort since formerly intractable varieties such as autoimmune pancreatitis are now becoming increasingly treatable, and subtype-specific therapeutic modalities may become available.
Article
BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is a condition which involves a wide variety of clinical signs and symptom. The course of which ranges from a mild self-limiting inflammatory process to a more fulminant course which could involve multiorgan dysfunction and lead to mortality. There are several scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis of which the commonly used are APACHE II and Ranson’s scoring systems. But the usage of these two are still under debate and hence the essential for the study. The aim and objective of the study is to compare the RANSON scoring system with APACHE II in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study is a prospective study of 50 cases of acute pancreatitis admitted in Government Tiruvannamalai Medical College Hospital, Tiruvannamalai, during the study period from May 2015 to September 2015. Fifty cases for the purpose of the study were selected on the basis of the nonprobability (purposive) sampling method. CONCLUSION The study includes 50 patients with acute pancreatitis, peak incidence was in the fourth decade with alcohol accounting for 30.3% of the attacks while gallstones accounted for 40.4%. An APACHE II score of ≥10 on admission predicted a complicated outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 62% and negative predictive value of 100%. Scores below 10 predicted an uncomplicated outcome. On admission APACHE II score was a better predictor of systemic complications (sensitivity 100%) than RANSON score (sensitivity 66.7%). Patients with APACHE II scores>10 benefitted from initial ICU care with aggressive therapy aimed at disease cure and dealing with the complications. Hence APACHE II Scoring can be used as a reliable tool in predicting the severity and prognosis than RANSON scoring in patients with Acute Pancreatitis.