ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Parasites can affect their hosts in various ways, and this implies that parasites may act as additional biotic stressors in a multiple-stressor scenario, resembling conditions often found in the field if, for example, pollutants and parasites occur simultaneously. Therefore, parasites represent important modulators of host reactions in ecotoxicological studies when measuring the response of organisms to stressors such as pollutants. In the present article, we introduce the most important groups of parasites occurring in organisms commonly used in ecotoxicological studies ranging from laboratory to field investigations. After briefly explaining their life cycles, we focus on parasite stages affecting selected ecotoxicologically relevant target species belonging to crustaceans, molluscs, and fish. We included ecotoxicological studies that consider the combination of effects of parasites and pollutants on the respective model organism with respect to aquatic host-parasite systems. We show that parasites from different taxonomic groups (e.g. Microsporidia, Monogenea, Trematoda, Cestoda, Acanthocephala, Nematoda) clearly modulate the response to stressors in their hosts. The combined effects of environmental stressors and parasites can range from additive, antagonistic to synergistic. This review points to potential drawbacks of ecotoxicological tests if parasite infections of test organisms, especially from the field, remain undetected and unaddressed. If these parasites are not detected and quantified, their physiological effects on the host cannot be separated from the ecotoxicological effects. This may render this type of ecotoxicological test erroneous. In laboratory tests, for example to determine effect or lethal concentrations, the presence of a parasite can also have a direct effect on the concentrations to be determined and thus, on the subsequently determined security levels such as predicted no effect concentrations.
Life cycles of parasitic plathelminths. (A) Life cycle of monogenean. Adult parasites live on fish and reproduce. Eggs are released to the water and an Oncomiracidium hatches that actively locates a new fish host, attaches, and develops to the adult. (B) Macrodactylogyrus congolensis attached to the gill filament of Claris gariepinus (arrow). Scale bar 500 µm. (C) Opisthaptor of M. congolensis. Scale bar 200 µm (photographs in 3B and 3C by N. Smit). (D) Life cycle of the cestode Ligula intestinalis. Adult cestodes in the intestine of a fish-eating bird. Eggs are released with faeces from the bird and coracidium larva hatches in water. The coracidium is consumed by a copepod and develops in its hemocoel to the procercoid larva. A fish (second intermediate host) is consuming the infected copepod and the larva migrates to the body cavity, where it develops to the large plerocercoid larva. Birds get infected by feeding on infected fish containing the plerocercoids. The cestode larva matures in the bird intestine and adult worms reproduce sexually (Gutiérrez & Hoole, 2022). (E) Plerocercoid larva of L. intestinalis dissected from the body cavity of roach. (F) Generalized life cycle of Trematoda. Eggs are released by the definitive host. The next host (first intermediate host) is a mollusc, in most cases a snail, that gets infected by ingesting the parasite eggs or miracidia (the larval stage that hatches from eggs). In the snail, the parasite develops into sporocysts and/or rediae (depending on trematode species) and multiplies asexually. Large numbers of free-swimming larval stages (cercariae) are produced and released to the water where (depending on the trematode species) they infect a second intermediate host, encyst on plants or other organisms (e.g., shells of snails), or are directly infective for the final vertebrate host where the parasite reproduces sexually (Esch et al., 2002). (G) Cercaria of Echinostoma recurvatum. (H) Redia of E. recurvatum containing developing cercariae. Scale bars 100 µm. Photographs: J. Schwelm.
… 
Content may be subject to copyright.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2023 The Authors
Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVolume 00, Number 00pp. 114, 2023
Received: 9 February 2023
|
Revised: 16 March 2023
|
Accepted: 4 June 2023 1
Environmental Toxicology
Parasites and Pollutants: Effects of Multiple Stressors
on Aquatic Organisms
Daniel Grabner,
a,
* Louisa E. Rothe,
a
and Bernd Sures
a,b,c
a
Aquatic Ecology and Centre for Water and Environmental Research, University of DuisburgEssen, Essen, Germany
b
Research Center One Health Ruhr, Research Alliance Ruhr, University DuisburgEssen, Essen, Germany
c
Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, NorthWest University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
Abstract: Parasites can affect their hosts in various ways, and this implies that parasites may act as additional biotic stressors
in a multiplestressor scenario, resembling conditions often found in the eld if, for example, pollutants and parasites occur
simultaneously. Therefore, parasites represent important modulators of host reactions in ecotoxicological studies when
measuring the response of organisms to stressors such as pollutants. In the present study, we introduce the most important
groups of parasites occurring in organisms commonly used in ecotoxicological studies ranging from laboratory to eld
investigations. After briey explaining their life cycles, we focus on parasite stages affecting selected ecotoxicologically
relevant target species belonging to crustaceans, molluscs, and sh. We included ecotoxicological studies that consider the
combination of effects of parasites and pollutants on the respective model organism with respect to aquatic hostparasite
systems. We show that parasites from different taxonomic groups (e.g., Microsporidia, Monogenea, Trematoda, Cestoda,
Acanthocephala, and Nematoda) clearly modulate the response to stressors in their hosts. The combined effects of envi-
ronmental stressors and parasites can range from additive, antagonistic to synergistic. Our study points to potential draw-
backs of ecotoxicological tests if parasite infections of test organisms, especially from the eld, remain undetected and
unaddressed. If these parasites are not detected and quantied, their physiological effects on the host cannot be separated
from the ecotoxicological effects. This may render this type of ecotoxicological test erroneous. In laboratory tests, for
example to determine effect or lethal concentrations, the presence of a parasite can also have a direct effect on
the concentrations to be determined and thus on the subsequently determined security levels, such as predicted noeffect
concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;00:114. © 2023 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
Keywords: Aquatic toxicology; Contaminants; Ecotoxicology; Environmental toxicology; Stressor
INTRODUCTION
In ecotoxicological studies, various test organisms are used
for either laboratory or eld investigations to assess the effects
of pollutants at various levels. In many cases, these test or-
ganisms might be infected by parasites. In fact, it is estimated
today that the number of parasite species ranges from one
third to over one half of the earth's total biodiversity
(Poulin, 2014; Poulin & Morand, 2004), therefore parasites are
common in most eldcollected test organisms used to study
toxicant effects. Because parasites often act as an additional
stressor, they will likely affect the outcome of ecotoxicological
studies (Marcogliese & Pietrock, 2011; Sures et al., 2023; Sures,
Nachev, Selbach, et al., 2017). Adverse effects of parasites on
the health of their hosts can usually be expected given the fact
that they have long been recognized as important pathogens
of different organisms, among them humans and livestock
(Sures, Nachev, Pahl, et al., 2017). The harm associated with
parasites has long been the main reason to study parasites,
which ended up in a wealth of medical and veterinary text-
books about their pathogenic effects and their possible treat-
ment. Following this initial awareness of parasites several key
studies demonstrated the wide distribution of parasites in wild
animals and gave examples of their ecological implications and
effects on ecosystem processes (e.g., Hudson et al., 2006;
Poulin, 1999; Timi & Poulin, 2020; Tompkins et al., 2011; Wood
& Johnson, 2015). In this context, it has to be noted that effects
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons
AttributionNonCommercialNoDerivs License, which permits use and
distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is
noncommercial and no modications or adaptations are made.
Published online 7 June 2023 in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5689
* Address correspondence to daniel.grabner@uni-due.de
are often more severe for intermediate hosts compared with
the nal host in the life cycle, particularly if the parasite is
trophically transmitted. Furthermore, some parasites do not
cause obvious effects on their hosts (Øverli & Johansen, 2019).
According to our common understanding, we can dene a
parasite as an organism that lives in or on another organism of a
different species (host) and has some effect on the host that has
mostly a negative, but sometimes also a positive, effect on the
host tness (Bollache et al., 2002; Cornet et al., 2009; Giari
et al., 2020; Helluy, 2013; Jacquin et al., 2014; Marcogliese,
2004, 2005; Piscart et al., 2007; Sures, Nachev, Pahl, et al., 2017;
Thomas et al., 2000). Although this denition might also include
bacteria and viruses, the word parasitesas opposed to
pathogensoftenrefersonlytoeukaryoticorganisms.Inthe
following sections, we use the term parasitein this sense.
Besides the consumption of host resources, parasites can mod-
ulate various host body functions such as the immune and hor-
mone system, metabolism and energy storage, the general stress
response (e.g., heat shock protein 70 [hsp70], cortisol), oxidative
stress, and other biomarkers (Ford & Fernandes, 2005; Marco-
gliese & Pietrock, 2011; Minguez et al., 2009; Morley, 2006;
Poulin, 1992; Sures, 2006, 2008a, 2008b; Sures, Nachev, Sel-
bach, et al., 2017; Tekmedash et al., 2016). In addition, several
parasites can accumulate toxicants and can reduce the tissue
concentrations in the host, which might, as a consequence, lead
to a different stress response in infected versus uninfected
hosts (Nachev & Sures, 2016; Sures & Nachev, 2022; Sures
et al., 2023). Before going into details with respect to possible
parasitepollutant interactions and their combined effects on
hosts and ecotoxicologically relevant parameters, we will give a
brief overview of the most important groups of parasites occur-
ring regularly in selected ecotoxicological target species be-
longing to crustaceans, molluscs, and sh.
ECOTOXICOLOGICALLY RELEVANT
PARASITE TAXA
Some parasite groups occur frequently in test organisms
that are used in ecotoxicological studies and can have a sig-
nicant impact on the response to further stressors. We briey
summarize the life cycles of the major parasite groups that are
relevant for our review.
Microsporidia
Taxonomically, the Microsporidia are closely related to the
fungi and belong to the group Opisthosporidia (Bojko
et al., 2022). They can parasitize a wide variety of hosts, in-
cluding crustacea and other invertebrates or sh, where they
develop intracellularly in various tissues, depending on the
microsporidian species. Transmission can be horizontally from
one host to the next or vertically via the gonads from mother to
offspring (Dunn et al., 2001; Smith, 2009; see Figure 1 for de-
tails). Because microsporidia cannot usually be detected by the
naked eye in their hosts, molecular analyses are necessary to
determine the infection status of the studied freeliving species
(e.g., Link et al., 2022).
Plathelminthes
The parasitic plathelminths comprise the Monogenea (skin
ukes), Cestoda (tapeworms), and Trematoda (ukes). Mono-
geneans are mostly ectoparasites (atworms of gills or skin) of
aquatic organisms like sh or amphibians (Figure 2AC). They
have simple life cycles using a single host species and without
asexual reproduction (Figure 2A). Some species are oviparous,
(A)(B)
FIGURE 1: Life cycle of microsporidians with (A) horizontal and (B) vertical transmission. (A) Horizontally transmitted microsporidians are usually
more pathogenic, and development of spores leads to host death and release of spores to the environment, where they are taken up by uninfected
amphipods. (B) In the case of vertical transmission, stages of the parasite enter the eggs via the ovary of the female and are transmitted to the
offspring. Vertically transmitted microsporidians are dependent on the host reproduction and will not have a signicant impact on the survival of
their host (Dunn et al., 2001). Nevertheless, these parasites can modulate the sex ratio of their host population by either male killing or feminization
(e.g., amphipods; Haine et al., 2007; Smith, 2009; Stentiford & Dunn, 2014).
2Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114Grabner et al.
© 2023 The Authors wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
producing eggs that release a freeswimming larval stage called
oncomiracidium, while some species are viviparous. On the host,
the adult monogeneans attach with a posterior structure, the
opisthaptor bearing hooks and/or suckers (Figure 2B,C), and
feed on mucus, epithelial cells, or blood (Bakke et al., 2007;
Buchmann & Bresciani, 2006). Monogenean populations were
found to react strongly to environmental stressors like metals or
eutrophication (Gilbert & AvenantOldewage, 2021) and were
(A)(D)
(E)
(B)
(F)
(G)
(H)
(C)
FIGURE 2: Life cycles of parasitic plathelminths. (A) Life cycle of monogenean. Adult parasites live on sh and reproduce. Eggs are released to the
water and an Oncomiracidium hatches that actively locates a new sh host, attaches, and develops to the adult. (B)Macrodactylogyrus congolensis
attached to the gill lament of Claris gariepinus (arrow). Scale bar 500 µm. (C) Opisthaptor of M. congolensis. Scale bar 200 µm (photographs in 3B
and 3C by N. Smit). (D) Life cycle of the cestode Ligula intestinalis. Adult cestodes in the intestine of a sheating bird. Eggs are released with faeces
from the bird and coracidium larva hatches in water. The coracidium is consumed by a copepod and develops in its hemocoel to the procercoid
larva. A sh (second intermediate host) is consuming the infected copepod and the larva migrates to the body cavity, where it develops to the large
plerocercoid larva. Birds get infected by feeding on infected sh containing the plerocercoids. The cestode larva matures in the bird intestine and
adult worms reproduce sexually (Gutiérrez & Hoole, 2022). (E) Plerocercoid larva of L. intestinalis dissected from the body cavity of roach.
(F) Generalized life cycle of Trematoda. Eggs are released by the denitive host. The next host (rst intermediate host) is a mollusc, in most cases a
snail, that gets infected by ingesting the parasite eggs or miracidia (the larval stage that hatches from eggs). In the snail, the parasite develops into
sporocysts and/or rediae (depending on trematode species) and multiplies asexually. Large numbers of freeswimming larval stages (cercariae) are
produced and released to the water where (depending on the trematode species) they infect a second intermediate host, encyst on plants or other
organisms (e.g., shells of snails), or are directly infective for the nal vertebrate host where the parasite reproduces sexually (Esch et al., 2002).
(G) Cercaria of Echinostoma recurvatum.(H) Redia of E. recurvatum containing developing cercariae. Scale bars 100 µm. Photographs: J. Schwelm.
Parasites and pollutantsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114 3
wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2023 The Authors
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
found to respond to environmental pollution (SanchezRamirez
et al., 2007).
In contrast to monogeneans, adult cestodes (tapeworms)
live in the host intestine. These parasites can have complex
life cycles with details that can vary largely depending on
the cestode species (Figure 2D,E). For example, the cestode
Ligula intestinalis, a parasite that interfers with the hormone
balance of its sh intermediate host, has a life cycle including a
copepod, a sh intermediate host, and a bird as the nal
host (Figure 2D). L. intestinalis has a strong inuence on the
hormone system of the sh and thereby interferes with host
reproduction (Schabuss et al., 2005; Trubiroha et al., 2010).
The life cycles of trematodes involve a vertebrate nal
host and one or two intermediate hosts, including a phase of
massive asexual multiplication in the rst intermediate host
(mostly snail; see Figure 2FH for details).
Acanthocephala
The exclusively parasitic helminth group Acanthocephala is
also called thornyheaded worms.These parasites have life
cycles that involve an invertebrate intermediate host (e.g., am-
phipods) and a vertebrate nal host (e.g., sh; Kennedy, 2006;
PerrotMinnot et al., 2023; see Figure 3 for details). The cys-
tacanth larvae (Figure 3B) often manipulate the behaviour of
their invertebrate intermediate host by interfering with host
physiology to enhance the trophic transmission to the nal host
(Helluy, 2013) and thereby execute a variety of physiological
effects (e.g., Bailly et al., 2018; Bakker et al., 2017; Bollache
et al., 2000; Cornet, 2011), which might also be important for
ecotoxicological studies (Grabner & Sures, 2019). Adult acan-
thocephalans (Figure 3C) are known to accumulate enormous
amounts of metals inside their bodies, often exceeding the
concentrations detected in the organs of their sh hosts (Sures &
Nachev, 2022). This enormous metal accumulation might even
lead to reduced metal concentrations in tissues of infected hosts
as compared with uninfected ones (see Sures, Nachev, Selbach,
et al., 2017; Sures et al., 2023, and references therein), sug-
gesting that adult acanthocephalans might be benecial to their
hosts under polluted conditions.
Nematoda
Not many nematodes (also called roundworms) have been
studied in an ecotoxicological context so far. One species for
which additional stressor effects on the host are comparatively
well studied is the eel nematode Anguillicola crassus. This
parasite is an invasive eel parasite in Europe and other parts
of the world, and uses different species of copepods as
intermediate hosts (see Figure 4 for details). As adults, these
nematodes suck blood from the capillaries inside the swim
bladder of eels and are therefore considered a serious threat to
the population of European eels (Sures & Knopf, 2004).
PARASITES AND POLLUTANTS AS
MULTIPLE STRESSORS
When parasitized test organisms are exposed to additional
stressors such as pollutants, they are subjected to multiple
stressors (Sures et al., 2023). The effects of the combined
stressors might be different compared with what can be
expected from each single stressor. Conceptually, there can be
different scenarios when dealing with two stressors (Figure 5):
First, one of the stressors can be dominant and override
(A)(B)
(C)
FIGURE 3: (A) Life cycle of the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus sp. In the sh nal host, the adult parasite lives in the intestine and reproduces
sexually. The females lay eggs that are released with the host faeces and are infective for the intermediate host that takes up the eggs containing
the acanthor stage orally (Taraschewski, 2000). In the amphipod intermediate host, the parasite develops to the acanthella and later to the
cystacanth stage, which is trophically transmitted to the sh. (B) Infected amphipod with cystacanth larva in the body cavity that can grow to a
considerable size compared with the host and is visible from the outside in the living host (arrow). (C) Opened sh intestine with heavy infection of
Pomphorhynchus sp.
4Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114Grabner et al.
© 2023 The Authors wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
the effects of the second stressor. Second, the two stressors
do not inuence each other in a way that their combined
effect is additive and, third, there can be an interaction be-
tween the stressors that is either synergistic or antagonistic
(Birk et al., 2020). In addition, there can be special cases, for
example the reversal of the response to combined stressors
compared with the predicted effect (Jackson et al., 2016; Vos
et al., 2023).
In the present study, we summarized examples that illustrate
the combined effects of parasites and pollutants on the
response of the host, focusing on aquatic parasites. Examples
that refer to the mere effects of the parasite are not considered
here. Also, we are not addressing studies describing the
effects of stressors on the parasite population or community.
Furthermore, we want to highlight some elds of research that
should be addressed to improve our understanding of the role
of parasites in ecotoxicological research. Overall, we intend to
create awareness in the ecotoxicology community for the wide
variety of effects parasites might have alone or in combination
with other stressors on the physiological homeostasis of their
hosts in eld and experimental studies. Moreover, when
addressing regulatory issues with the aim of determining safe
environmental contaminant concentrations, such approaches
should also consider parasitised test organisms because
(B)(A)
FIGURE 4: Life cycle of the eel nematode Anguillicola crassus.(A) Life cycle including the eel nal host where the adult nematodes live in the swim
bladder and reproduce sexually. Eggs are released with eel faeces and the L2 larval stage is taken up by copepods. The larva moults to the L3 stage,
which is infective for the eel (De Charleroy et al., 1990). Optional paratenic sh hosts can feed on infected copepods and transmit the parasite to
eels (Moravec & Skorikova, 1998; Thomas & Ollevier, 1992). (B) Photograph of A. crassus adults recovered from a dissected swim bladder.
FIGURE 5: Schematic overview of the effects of parasitism and pollutionrelated stress on organisms at various levels. Potential response is shown:
(a) additive effect of both stressors, (b) antagonistic effect, and (c) synergistic effect. Black arrows, effect of individual stressor; green arrows,
combined effect of both stressors; +/indicates direction of effect). Some elements of the gure were created with BioRender.com.
Parasites and pollutantsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114 5
wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2023 The Authors
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
parasites could alter both contaminant accumulation patterns
and host responses to contaminants.
COMBINED EFFECTS OF PARASITES AND
OTHER STRESSORS
In this section, we give examples of the response of
organisms to both parasites and other (mostly chemical)
stressors. The examples are grouped by the way of stressor
interactions (additive, synergistic, antagonistic) as far as this can
be inferred from the results. Finally, we will address several
further aspects that determine the interaction of parasites and
other stressors.
Putative additive effects
An additive effect occurs if the measured response of a test
organism to a chemical stressor is further increased due to in-
fection by a parasite. There are not many examples that could
be recovered from the literature describing an additive effect of
parasite +stressor. This might indicate that the interaction of
parasites and additional stressors shows a more complex pattern
in most cases. One example of a signicant additive effect on
mortality was found for sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka)
that were exposed to zinc if in addition they were
infected with adult cestodes (Eubothrium salvelini). The time
to reach 50% mortality was reduced by 25% in infected and
exposed sh relative to uninfected and exposed sh (Boyce &
Yamada, 1977). Similarly, individuals of threespined sticklebacks
(Gasterosteus aculeatus) infected with plerocercoid larvae of the
cestode Schistocephalus solidus showed increased mortality
(maximum reduction of mean period of survival from ~800 to
300 h) and consequently a lower 50% lethal concentration (LC50)
for cadmium compared with uninfected sh (Pascoe &
Cram, 1977). On the sublethal level, an additive effect of para-
site and pollution on the number of pigmented macrophages
was observed in spottail shiners (Notropis hudsonius)infectedby
the apicomplexan Eimeria degiustii (Thilakaratne et al., 2007).
Additive effects were also detected for ectoparasites and pol-
lution exposure. In the guppy Poecila reticulata,exposuretozinc
led to increased epidermal thickness, and infection with the
monogenean Gyrodactylus turnbulli further increased this effect
at moderate parasite densities (Gheorghiu et al., 2012). A similar
additive effect was found for the activities of the biomarkers
aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, and
the concentrations of creatinine and urea in sh (Oreochromis
niloticus,Clarias gariepinus) exposed to elevated metal levels
and ectoparasites (Monogenea, Crustacea, Protozoa). The bio-
marker levels in infected sh were increased by 13% to 40%
compared with uninfected sh (ElSeify et al., 2011).
These examples show that the lack of consideration of
parasite infections can lead to an overestimation of the toxicity
of a pollutant according to the effects on the host. On the other
hand, results obtained from parasitefree populations can lead
to false conclusions about the toxic potential of a substance
under eld conditions when parasites come into play.
Putative synergistic effects
In contrast to the simple additive effect of two stressors,
synergistic effects might lead to unexpected results that cannot
be predicted based on the single stressor effects. In some
cases, the effects of toxicants only become detectable in par-
asitized hosts (Coors & De Meester, 2008; Coors et al., 2008;
Rothe et al., 2022). Furthermore, toxicant effects can be in-
creased by the parasite to a higher level than expected based
on the outcome of each single stressor exposure (either pol-
lution or parasite) due to a synergistic effect of the two stressors
(Thilakaratne et al., 2007). As a consequence, the combined
effect of parasites and pollution is higher than the sum of the
two effects measured in a single exposure, thus parasites can
make pollution effects detectable, which may result in a pol-
lutant being deemed environmentally relevant. Conversely, the
effects of parasites can become apparent through additional
exposure of the host to further stressors. For example, a dif-
ferential response of the biomarker lipid peroxidation (~26%
higher in infected sh) between individuals of yellow perch
(Perca avescens) that were infected or uninfected with the
nematode Raphidascaris acus was only observed if an addi-
tional chemical stressor was present (Marcogliese, Brambilla,
et al., 2005). A comparable reaction was found in female
Gammarus roeselii that were exposed to cadmium and infected
with microsporidian parasites. The amphipods showed reduced
energy reserves (~40% decrease in total lipids and 30% de-
crease in glycogen level relative to the uninfected amphipods),
elevated susceptibility to oxidative stress (up to 60% decreased
levels of reduced glutathione relative to uninfected amphi-
pods) and approximately 50% increased cellular damage
(based on levels of malondialdehyde) compared with unin-
fected cadmiumexposed individuals. Parasite infection alone
did not affect the tested biomarkers (Gismondi et al., 2012b).
Presumably, the change in host metabolism caused by the
parasite leads to a stronger response to another stressor. This
in turn illustrates that a parasitized population may already
show effects at lower pollutant concentrations than would be
the case with a nonparasitized population.
Putative antagonistic effects
In some cases, parasites increase the tolerance of the host
to stressors due to an antagonistic effect of the parasite. In this
context, Piscart et al. (2007) found that acanthocephalan
infected amphipods show an increased tolerance to elevated
salinity levels of approximatley 60% to more than 100% based
on LC50. Similarly, cestode larvae were described to increase
Artemia sp. resistance to arsenic during acute toxicity tests
(Sánchez et al., 2016). In infected Artemia sp., consistently in-
creased LC50 values (50% to over 100%) were found compared
with uninfected conspecics. Even after increasing the water
temperature from 25 °C to 29 °C the benecial effects of the
cestode infection prevail with infected Artemia sp. The latter
showed approximately 60% higher levels of catalase and
approximately 50% higher glutathione reductase activity
compared with uninfected individuals, which both can be
6Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114Grabner et al.
© 2023 The Authors wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
interpreted as protection measures against (temperature
induced) oxidative stress (Sánchez et al., 2016).
Likewise, a positive effect on survival of infected compared
with uninfected hosts was found in some cases for trematode
infected snails (Zeacumantus subcarinatus) that were exposed
experimentally to different oceanacidication conditions. At
pH 7.6, mortality ranged between 3% and 23% in infected
snails (depending on the trematode species) and was 28% in
uninfected snails. At pH 7.4, the mortality rate of infected snails
ranged from 13% to 31% compared with 22% for the unin-
fected snails. In contrast at pH 8.1, the mortality rate of unin-
fected snails was lower (3%) compared with infected snails
(7%33%; MacLeod & Poulin, 2016b). A similar nding was
made for trematodeinfected mussels (Pisidium amnicum) ex-
posed to pentacholorophenol. The mean survival time of the
infected mussels was increased by more than 100% at 19 °C
but there was an overall negative tness effect of the parasite
due to castration of the host (Heinonen et al., 2001). Reduced
mortality of the host even under stressor exposure might be
benecial for the parasite because the host will provide habitat
and resources for growth, development, and/or multiplication
of the parasite (e.g., trematode larvae in snails). Even for
trophically transmitted parasites (e.g., cestode larvae in
Artemia sp.) survival of the intermediate host is essential during
the development of the parasite larva (until it is infective for the
next host; see Bailly et al., 2018; Dianne et al., 2011; Franceschi
et al., 2008). Furthermore, host death might interfere with
transmission if the nal host feeds only on live prey.
Another example of a potential protective effect of acan-
thocephalans was found in chub (Squalius cephalus), where
signicantly lower oxidative damage was observed in tissues of
chub that were exposed to organic pollutants if they were also
infected with acanthocephalans (Pomphorhynchus sp.; Molbert
et al., 2020). In general, some acanthocephalan species are
presumably benecial for their host because there are several
studies showing the accumulation potential of acanthocepha-
lans for metals. Tissue concentrations of metals in the parasite
can highly exceed those of the host and metal concentrations
can even be reduced in tissues of infected compared with
uninfected hosts (Sures, 2006; Sures, Nachev, Selbach,
et al., 2017; Sures et al., 2023).
Antagonistic effects of parasites can also have negative
consequences for the host if a protective stressor response
(e.g., hsp70, metallothioneins) is decreased in infected hosts.
Such a case was found in cockles (Cerastoderma edule) in-
fected by trematodes and exposed to cadmium. By reducing
the production of protective metallothioneins by 70% relative
to the uninfected hosts, the parasites impaired the detox-
ication mechanisms of the host and caused an increase in
cadmium accumulation (795 ng/g in infected vs. 569 ng/gin
uninfected cockles) and presumably increased toxic effects
(Baudrimont & de Montaudouin, 2007). The larvae of the
acanthocephalan parasite Polymorphus minutus reduced
(~80% compared with uninfected amphipods) or completely
disrupted the hsp70 response caused by cadmium or heat
exposure in amphipods (Gammarus fossarum and G. roeselii;
Frank et al., 2013; Sures & Radszuweit, 2007). It is not clear to
date whether the reduction of the detoxication capabilities or
the cellular defence mechanisms have an effect on host tness.
Also, the potential biological signicance of the impairment for
the parasite is not known.
Another presumably antagonistic effect of the combination
of parasite and chemical stress was observed in a study of
European eel (Anguilla anguilla) infected with the swimbladder
nematode Anguillicola crassus that were exposed to both
cadmium and 3,3,4,4,5pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126). At the
end of the experiment, cortisol levels in the parasiteinfected
and chemicalexposed group were only 60% of those of the
parasitized eel without exposure. An explanation could be
cortisolmediated immune suppression induced by the parasite
that might be disturbed by the chemical exposure (Sures
et al., 2006). However, it is not known whether the interference
with immune suppressive mechanisms of the parasite inu-
ences the host defence against the parasite.
No combined stressor effects
It is important to note that parasites do not necessarily have
an inuence on the effects of further stressors in the host. For
example, no effect of parasitism on the host response was
found in toxapheneexposed Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
infected with the tapeworm Diphyllobothrium dendriticum and
tadpoles of the frog Rana palustris exposed to malathion and
infected with the trematode Echinostoma trivolvis (Blanar
et al., 2005; Budischak et al., 2009). Similarly, parasites had no
signicant effect on the biomarker response of common carp
(Cyprinus carpio) and African sharptooth catsh (Clarias
gariepinus) sampled from stream sites with elevated metal
concentrations in the study of Erasmus et al. (2020), even
though several metals were accumulated by the parasites and
thereby reduced in the host tissues. These examples show that
it is not possible to assume in all cases that parasites will affect
the response of the host to pollutants. Nevertheless, the host
stress response in relation to parasites can be affected by fur-
ther factors, for example the infection intensity of the parasite
(see section Additional factors inuencing the host stress
response).
Additional factors inuencing the host stress
response
The effect of parasites on the host response to other stres-
sors is difcult to generalize because the outcome can be de-
pendent on a variety of factors, some of which are outlined in
this section.
Temperature. When using temperature as a stressor it was
found that infection by the trematode Himasthla elongata in-
creased the mortality of the gastropod host Littorina littorea at
elevated temperatures (e.g., median survival duration of 5 and
16 days for infected and uninfected snails, respectively; Diaz
Morales et al., 2022). In a similar way, brown trout (Salmo trutta)
fry and alevins exposed to the oomycete Saprolegnia parasitica
Parasites and pollutantsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114 7
wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2023 The Authors
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
showed increased mortality in the parasite treatment (50% up
to 100% mortality compared with <30% in the uninfected sh)
when facing intermittent temperature increases (CasasMulet
et al., 2021). Temperature is normally controlled in laboratory
experiments and reported in eld studies. However, when
planning studies, especially with parasites, it must be consid-
ered that different temperature levels can lead to signicantly
different results. There are several other examples where bio-
marker responses due to parasites and additional stressors
showed additive, but overall complex patterns (e.g., con-
trasting results depending on host sex). These studies will be
shown in the following sections.
Speciesspecic effects. Effects of stressors were found to be
highly speciesspecic depending on the parasite and host
species studied, with clear differences found even for closely
related taxa. For example, exposure to desethylatrazine caused
an increase in mortality in the freshwater gastropod Stagnicola
elodes if infected by a trematode (gymnocephalustype cer-
cariae, ~30% survival) but did not affect mortality in exposed
snails infected with Echinoparyphium sp. (~80% survival;
Koprivnikar & Walker, 2011). Parasite species also made a con-
siderable difference in the study of MacLeod and Poulin (2016a),
who found signicantly variable rates of oxygen consumption
and tissue glucose levels in the intertidal gastropod Z. sub-
carinatus kept at different pH treatments depending on the
trematode species present. Similarly, the reaction of the stress
protein hsp70 can be modulated by parasites, but the outcome
depends largely on the hostparasite system studied. While
elevated temperature or cadmium exposure in combination with
microsporidian infection caused increased hsp70 levels in Gam-
marus pulex and G. fossarum, there was no modulation of hsp70
by the acanthocephalan P. minutus in G. fossarum, irrespective of
the exposure (Chen et al., 2015; Grabner et al., 2014). On the
other hand, an over 2000% higher induction of hsp70 was found
in the study of Frank et al. (2013) in P. minutusinfected G. fos-
sarum. In the same study, cadmium exposure also induced a
more than 7000% increase of hsp70 levels, whereas the combi-
nation of parasite and cadmium resulted in a lower hsp70 re-
sponse than the metal exposure in uninfected individuals (Frank
et al., 2013). These partly contradictory results might be due to
unnoticed microsporidian infections in the amphipods in the
study of Frank et al. (2013). Rothe et al. (2022) found an in-
creasing effect on several biomarkers in the same P. minutusG.
fossarum system, whereas there was no signicant effect of
treated wastewater. Interestingly, the same acanthocephalan
species completely disrupted the hsp70 response of the am-
phipod G. roeselii even after exposure to palladium and heat
(Sures & Radszuweit, 2007). The impairment of the stress re-
sponse by one parasitepollutant combination can be further
modulated by coinfecting parasites present in the same host
individual. For example, microsporidian parasites can disrupt the
effects of acanthocephalan parasites on the host. In G. roeselii
infected with both the microsporidian Dictyocoela roeselum and
the acanthocephalan P. minutus, the microsporidian effects on
the biomarker response dominated that of the acanthocephalan
compared with infections with only a single parasite (Gismondi
et al., 2012a). The reason for this observation might be the more
severe impact of the microsporidians on host metabolism during
phases of massive multiplication.
These examples make it clear that it is not appropriate to
speak of parasites in general terms if we want to understand
ecotoxicological relationships. On the contrary, different par-
asite taxa need to be considered individually and their impact
on the host has to be assessed in each case.
Concentrationdependent or parasite infection intensity
effects. It was found that the effects of parasites can vary
greatly depending on the concentration of the pollutants or the
number of parasite stages per host. For example, trematodes
in sh (yellow perch, P. avescens) caused an increase in cat-
alase and a decrease of glutathione reductase activity but only
at sites with the highest pollutant levels, while no parasite
effect on the biomarker response was observed in sh from
sites with low pollutant concentrations (Marcogliese
et al., 2010). Molbert et al. (2021) also found a response of
chub (S. cephalus) parasitized with acanthocephalans (Pom-
phorhynchus sp.) depending on the exposure levels to poly-
cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Interestingly, levels of
oxidative stress were more than 60% higher in parasitized sh
exposed to low PAH levels but approximately 40% lower at
higher PAH concentrations compared with uninfected sh from
the same exposure. Similarly, northern leopard frogs (Lith-
obates pipiens) naturally exposed to different atrazine levels
showed an interaction of the nematode parasite Oswaldocruzia
sp. and atrazine on the oxidative stress marker thiol. Thiol levels
were increased with parasite abundance, but only at low atra-
zine levels while decreasing thiol levels were measured
with increasing parasite abundance at high atrazine levels
(Marcogliese et al., 2021). An effect of infection intensity was
found in yellow perch (P. avescens) infected with trematode
metacercariae of the trematode A. brevis. If more than
10 metacercariae were detected, the sh showed 40% to
50% higher levels of lipid peroxidation than sh with <10
metacercariae (Marcogliese, Brambilla, et al., 2005).
Overall, these results show that the stress response of the
host often is not linearly related to parasite intensity and/or
pollutant concentrations, therefore it is important to test a
range of pollutants, but at the same time to consider parasite
infection intensity for the effect that is caused in the host. In-
fection intensity is not always considered, mainly for micro-
parasites that cannot be quantied easily. For parasite stages
that are not directly countable, semiquantitative methods
could be applied (e.g., rating intensity from low, medium to
high), or molecular methods such as quantitative polymerase
chain reaction could be used.
Effect of host age. The age distribution in the host pop-
ulation plays an important role to determine infection param-
eters and disease progression (BenAmi, 2019; Thomas, 2002).
This aspect has been rarely investigated in an ecotoxicological
context. For example, Thilakaratne et al. (2007) found stronger
parasiteinduced effects according to the biomarker response
in younger spottail shiners (N. hudsonius) compared with older
8Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114Grabner et al.
© 2023 The Authors wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
sh. In many cases it will be difcult to determine the age of
the hosts if no laboratorybred individuals are available. Host
size can be used for some species for an approximation of host
age or at least to distinguish juvenile from adult individuals.
Effect of host gender. Gender is also an important factor
that can have a tremendous effect on the outcome of eco-
toxicological studies, as has been shown, for example, for
amphipods (Gismondi et al., 2013). Accordingly, the response
to the combined effects of parasites and further stressors is
often dependent on the host sex. Minguez et al. (2009) found
structural changes in the lysosomal system and an increase in
neutral lipids in the tissues of male Dreissena polymorpha
infected with parasites and exposed to pollution (30% higher
males), whereas the opposite trend was found in parasitized
and exposed female D. polymorpha (45% higher in females).
In an amphipodacanthocephalan system, under cadmium
exposures, decreased mortality was found for G. roeselii
males infected with P. minutus compared with uninfected
amphipods (LC50 almost 200% higher in infected amphi-
pods). In contrast, mortality was increased (LC50 more than
200% higher in uninfected amphipods), and a stronger re-
sponse of toxic effect biomarkers was found in infected and
exposed females compared with uninfected individuals (e.g.,
50% increased malondialdehyde levels in cadmiumexposed
uninfected females, whereas infected females showed an in-
crease of 160% under cadmium exposure; Gismondi, Beisel,
et al., 2012; Gismondi, CossuLeguille, et al., 2012). Similarly,
glycogen levels were increased by 60% only in female
G. fossarum infected with the microsporidian Dictyocoela
duebenum and exposed to sublethal cadmium levels, but not
in males, in the study of Chen et al. (2015). Complex sex
specic differences were also found in the marine amphipod
Gammarus tigrinus exposed to different temperature levels
and infected with the trematode Podocotyle atomon.Infected
females showed lower phenoloxidase activity than males at
14 and 18 °C, and catalase activity was increased at higher
temperatures for infected males and uninfected females while
being increased at lower temperatures for infected females
(DiazMorales et al., 2023).
These results highlight that host sex should be used as a
factor in the analysis of stressor effects. Furthermore, it is
important to improve the understanding of differences in the
reaction of female and male individuals to pollutants and par-
asites, and to clarify the underlying mechanisms.
FUTURE DIRCTIONS OF RESEARCH ON
PARASITES AND STRESSORS
The examples presented in the previous section (Com-
bined effects of parasites and other stressors) illustrate the
inuence of parasites on the stress response of the host and
therefore their importance for ecotoxicological studies. We
therefore advocate the deliberate inclusion of parasite in-
fectionintheplanninganddesign of ecotoxicological studies.
The possible forms of interaction of the effects (additive,
synergistic, antagonistic) should be taken into account when
formulating hypotheses. Furthermore, based on the addi-
tional factors inuencing parasite/stressor interactions out-
lined above, we recommend that the following factors, which
have received little attention to date, should be considered to
a greater extent. First, different temperature and pollutant
levels should be applied to study the gradient of responses of
both parasitized and unparasitized hosts. If possible, parasite
infection intensities should be assessed, or even controlled.
Second, host age and gender should be assessed and used as
factors whenever possible. This will improve the systematic
investigation of parasite effects, including additional stressors,
and lead to a mechanistic understanding of how parasites
inuence the host response.
Furthermore, there are some elements of the host biology
that can be inuenced both by environmental stressors and
parasites, but their interaction is only poorly understood: en-
docrine effects of parasites and pollutants, and the interactive
effects of parasites and chemical stressors on the host micro-
biome. Due to their importance for ecotoxicological questions,
both aspects will be summarized briey in the following sec-
tions. In addition, there are common test organisms that have
not been subject to studies involving parasites, although they
can be affected by various parasites in natural systems.
Effects of parasites on the endocrine system
of the host
Some parasites interfere with the endocrine system of their
host, mostly impairing the reproductive system or causing the
phenomenon of intersex, for example the cestode larva of
Ligula intestinalis in sh, trematodes in snails, or vertically
transmitted (from mother to offspring) microsporidians (Ford
& Fernandes, 2005; Grabner & Sures, 2019; Jobling &
Tyler, 2003; Lewis et al., 2015; Morley, 2006; Trubiroha
et al., 2009). Pollution might have similar effects that can be
difcult to disentangle from the parasite (Ford et al., 2006;
Schabuss et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2008). For example, in the
amphipod G. pulex it was found that vertically transmitted
microsporidian parasites interfere with the effects of the en-
docrine disruptor cyproterone on sperm production of the
host (Gismondi et al., 2017).
Further studies are needed to understand the combined
effect on the endocrine system of parasites and chemicals, for
example those enhancing the knowledge of relevant bio-
markers to assess feminization or sexual dysfunction and dis-
tinguish between the effects of parasites and toxicant exposure
(Short et al., 2014). As a starting point, relatively wellstudied
endocrinedisrupting parasites, for example L. intestinalis as a
model parasite in vertebrates and microsporidians in amphi-
pods for invertebrates, should be studied in more detail.
However, for the latter, much more fundamental knowledge
needs to be gained on the endocrinedisrupting effects of the
parasite itself. The goal should be to analyse the combination
of parasites that affect the hormone system of the host with
exposure to endocrinedisrupting chemicals.
Parasites and pollutantsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114 9
wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2023 The Authors
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Effects of the host microbiome
Studying the role of the microbiome of organisms is be-
coming more and more important in various research elds.
This applies also to ecotoxicology, where the interplay of the
gut microbiota, toxicant exposure, and physiological effects is
being investigated (Claus et al., 2016). Recent ndings high-
light that parasites have a substantial inuence on the host
microbiome (Dheilly et al., 2019; Fu et al., 2022) and that the
effects of parasites on the gut microbiota of sh (chub, Squalius
cephalus) can be more pronounced than exposure to PAHs
(Colin et al., 2022). Nevertheless, this research eld is in its
infancy and the signicance of changes in the microbiome
(e.g., by parasites and/or pollutants) for the host is still un-
known, therefore the rst step is to improve knowledge of the
microbiome function in vertebrates and invertebrates. The
second step is to test of the microbiome response to parasite
and pollutant exposure. Exposurerelated changes in the host
microbiome might also provide explanations for stressor effects
reported previously (e.g., biomarker responses).
Further parasites and pathogens that might have
an inuence on the stress response
The parasites of some commonly used test organisms have
been well characterized and we already have some knowledge of
the combined effects of toxicant exposure, for example for
amphipods, sh, snails, and mussels (see above). Daphnia spp.
can be affected by a number of parasites under natural con-
ditions (Stirnadel & Ebert, 1997) and provide a great opportunity
to study parasite (e.g., Microsporidia) and environmental stressor
effects under laboratory conditions because protocols exist
for the controlled infection of Daphnia under these conditions
(e.g., Coors et al., 2008). However, there is a number of common
ecotoxicological test organisms for which only limited in-
formation is available on the role of parasites in addition to other
stressors. Zebrash, for example, can be affected by several
parasite taxa even under laboratory conditions (Kent et al., 2020)
and infections by microsporidians were even found in research
strains with sometimes subclinical infections that might affect
the outcome of experiments (Sanders et al., 2012). Among
invertebrate models, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is
used in ecotoxicological standard tests (e.g., Schertzinger
et al., 2017), but freeliving individuals can be infected by
microsporidians or pathogenic bacteria (Hodgkin & Partridge,
2008), therefore toxicity testing including parasitized test groups
might be possible for this species. Lubriculus variegatus is
also commonly used for ecotoxicological sediment testing
(e.g., Kontchou et al., 2023), but Lumbriculus spp. (and other
oligochaetes) are also common hosts for myxozoans (Kent et al.,
2001). This might be an interesting hostparasite model because
infected individuals can be identied according to the detection
of actinospores from infected individuals.
Some of the test organisms are available as pathogenfree
cultures, for example C. elegans,Lumbriculus spp., and Daphnia
sp., and provide the possibility to study toxicant effects
without confounding effects from parasites. However, from an
ecotoxicological perspective, conclusions drawn from parasite
free laboratory populations might not reect the response of
natural eld populations that are affected by parasites. This is
particularly relevant for parameters that are used to determine
safety limits of substances like LC50 and lowest or no observed
effect concentrations. These values might be considerably dif-
ferent if determined with parasitefree test organisms or if para-
site infection is included, therefore including parasites in
ecotoxicological studies will provide a more realistic assessment
of stressor effects in a natural environment. Such experiments, in
which parasite infection is controlled, are less problematic if an
infection can be detected easily, such as for acanthocephalan
cystacanth larvae in amphipods that can be observed in the living
host, and host individuals can be selected according to the ex-
perimental design (Grabner & Sures, 2019). Nevertheless, most
parasites are visible only after the dissection of the host and the
use of further diagnostic techniques such as molecular detection.
In the latter case, initial parasitological screening of eld pop-
ulations will help to estimate the prevalence of parasites in the
population and help in planning experiments. Test organisms
should then be analysed for parasites at the end of the experi-
ment to be able to elucidate potential parasite effects on the
selected endpoints. Alternatively, experimental infections of
laboratorycultured test organisms can be conducted in the
course of ecotoxicological experiments if appropriate protocols
for a standardized infection are developed.
In addition to protist or metazoan parasites, there are sev-
eral pathogens such as viruses and bacteria that rarely have
been considered as an inuencing factor in ecotoxicological
studies because their impact on the host is often not known (for
amphipods, see Bojko & Ovcharenko, 2019; for Daphnia, see
Stirnadel & Ebert, 1997). Those pathogens and further, un-
described parasites have to be characterized in more detail to
know the full inventoryof the test organisms.
CONCLUSION
If we want to understand ecosystem processes, including
the effects of toxic substances on organisms and populations,
we need to consider parasites as integral parts of ecosystems
to get a reliable estimation of pollutant effects under reallife
conditions and to determine the safety limits of chemicals that
reect the responses of natural populations. We therefore
should consider naturally occurring parasites when using test
organisms from the eld and, if possible, also conduct tests
with laboratoryinfected hosts in addition to other stressors.
AcknowledgmentsThe present study was performed within
the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 1439 RESIST (sub-
project A09) funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG, German Research Foundation)CRC 1439/1project
number: 426547801. Open Access funding enabled and
organized by the open access publication fund of the University
of DuisburgEssen (Projekt DEAL).
Conict of InterestThe authors declare no conict of interest.
10 Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114Grabner et al.
© 2023 The Authors wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Author Contribution StatementDaniel Grabner: Conceptu-
alization; Writingoriginal draft; Writingreview & editing.
Louisa E. Rothe: Visualization; Writingoriginal draft;
Writingreview & editing. Bernd Sures: Conceptualization;
Funding acquisition; Writingoriginal draft; Writingreview &
editing.
Data Availability StatementNo original data was produced
for this review article.
REFERENCES
Bailly, Y., Cezilly, F., & Rigaud, T. (2018). Stagedependent behavioural
changes but early castration induced by the acanthocephalan parasite
Polymorphus minutus in its Gammarus pulex intermediate host. Para-
sitology,145(3), 260268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017001457
Bakke, T. A., Cable, J., & Harris, P. D. (2007). The biology of gyrodactylid
monogeneans: The Russiandoll killers.Advances in Parasitology,64,
161376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(06)64003-7
Bakker, T. C. M., Frommen, J. G., Thünken, T., & Bshary, R. (2017). Adaptive
parasitic manipulation as exemplied by acanthocephalans. Ethology,
123(11), 779784. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12660
Baudrimont, M., & de Montaudouin, X. (2007). Evidence of an altered
protective effect of metallothioneins after cadmium exposure in the
digenean parasiteinfected cockle (Cerastoderma edule). Parasitology,
134(Part 2), 237245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182006001375
BenAmi, F. (2019). Host age effects in invertebrates: Epidemiological,
ecological, and evolutionary implications. Trends in Parasitology,35(6),
466480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.03.008
Birk, S., Chapman, D., Carvalho, L., Spears, B. M., Andersen, H. E., Argillier,
C., Auer, S., BaattrupPedersen, A., Banin, L., Beklioglu, M., Bondar
Kunze, E., Borja, A., Branco, P., Bucak, T., Buijse, A. D., Cardoso, A. C.,
Couture, R. M., Cremona, F., de Zwart, D., & Hering, D. (2020). Impacts
of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and eco-
systems. Nature, Ecology & Evolution,4(8), 10601068. https://doi.org/
10.1038/s41559-020-1216-4
Blanar, C. A., Curtis, M. A., & Chan, H. M. (2005). Growth, nutritional
composition, and hematology of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus)
exposed to toxaphene and tapeworm (Diphyllobothrium dendriticum)
larvae. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,48(3),
397404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-004-0064-6
Bojko, J., & Ovcharenko, M. (2019). Pathogens and other symbionts of the
Amphipoda: Taxonomic diversity and pathological signicance. Diseases
of Aquatic Organisms,136(1), 336. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03321
Bojko, J., Reinke, A. W., Stentiford, G. D., Williams, B., Rogers, M. S. J., &
Bass, D. (2022). Microsporidia: A new taxonomic, evolutionary, and
ecological synthesis. Trends in Parasitology,38(8), 642659. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.pt.2022.05.007
Bollache, L., Gambade, G., & Cézilly, F. (2000). The effects of two
acanthocephalan parasites, Pomphorhynchus laevis and Polymorphus
minutus, on pairing success in male Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Am-
phipoda). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,49(4), 296303. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s002650000300
Bollache, L., Rigaud, T., & Cezilly, F. (2002). Effects of two acanthocephalan
parasites on the fecundity and pairing status of female Gammarus
pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,79(2),
102110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2011(02)00027-7
Boyce, N. P., & Yamada, S. B. (1977). Effects of a parasite, Eubothrium
salvelini (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea), on the resistance of juvenile sockeye
salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka,tozinc.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and
Aquatic Sciences,34(5), 706709. https://doi.org/10.1139/f77-110
Buchmann, K., & Bresciani, J. (2006). Monogenea (Phylum Platyhelminthes).
In P. T. K. Woo (Ed.), Fish diseases and disorders. Volume 1: Protozoan
and metazoan infections (pp. 297344). CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/
10.1079/9780851990156.0297
Budischak, S. A., Belden, L. K., & Hopkins, W. A. (2009). Relative toxicity
of malathion to trematodeinfected and noninfected Rana palustris
tadpoles. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,
56(1), 123128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9167-9
CasasMulet, R., Matthews, E., Geist, J., Durance, I., & Cable, J. (2021).
Negative effects of parasite exposure and variable thermal stress on
brown trout (Salmo trutta) under future climatic and hydropower pro-
duction scenarios. Climate Change Ecology,2, 100039. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ecochg.2021.100039
Chen, H. Y., Grabner, D. S., Nachev, M., Shih, H. H., & Sures, B. (2015).
Effects of the acanthocephalan Polymorphus minutus and the micro-
sporidian Dictyocoela duebenum on energy reserves and stress re-
sponse of cadmium exposed Gammarus fossarum.PeerJ,3, e1353.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1353
Claus, S. P., Guillou, H., & ElleroSimatos, S. (2016). The gut microbiota: A
major player in the toxicity of environmental pollutants? NPJ Biolms and
Microbiomes,2(1), 16003. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjbiolms.2016.3
Colin, Y., Molbert, N., Berthe, T., Agostini, S., Alliot, F., Decencière, B.,
Millot, A., Goutte, A., & Petit, F. (2022). Dysbiosis of sh gut microbiota
is associated with helminths parasitism rather than exposure to PAHs
at environmentally relevant concentrations. Scientic Reports,12(1),
11084. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15010-2
Coors, A., & De Meester, L. (2008). Synergistic, antagonistic and additive
effects of multiple stressors: Predation threat, parasitism and pesticide
exposure in Daphnia magna.Journal of Applied Ecology,45(6),
18201828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01566.x
Coors, A., Decaestecker, E., Jansen, M., & De Meester, L. (2008). Pesticide
exposure strongly enhances parasite virulence in an invertebrate host
model. Oikos,117(12), 18401846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.
2008.17028.x
Cornet, S. (2011). Densitydependent effects on parasite growth and
parasiteinduced host immunodepression in the larval helminth Pom-
phorhynchus laevis.Parasitology,138(2), 257265. https://doi.org/10.
1017/S0031182010001083
Cornet,S.,Franceschi,N.,Bauer,A.,Rigaud,T.,&Moret,Y.(2009).Im-
mune depression induced by acanthocephalan parasites in their in-
termediate crustacean host: Consequences for the risk of super
infection and links with host behavioural manipulation. International
Journal for Parasitology,39(2), 221229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijpara.2008.06.007
De Charleroy, D., Grisez, L., Thomas, K., Belpaire, C., & Ollevier, F. (1990).
The life cycle of Anguillicola crassus.Diseases of Aquatic Organisms,
8(2), 7784.
Dianne, L., PerrotMinnot, M. J., Bauer, A., Gaillard, M., Leger, E., & Rigaud,
T. (2011). Protection rst then facilitation: A manipulative parasite
modulates the vulnerability to predation of its intermediate host ac-
cording to its own developmental stage. Evolution,65(9), 26922698.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01330.x
Dheilly, N. M., Martínez Martínez, J., Rosario, K., Brindley, P. J., Fichorova,
R. N., Kaye, J. Z., Kohl, K. D., Knoll, L. J., Lukeš, J., Perkins, S. L., Poulin,
R., Schriml, L., & Thompson, L. R. (2019). Parasite microbiome project:
Grand challenges. PLoS Pathogens,15(10), e1008028. https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.ppat.1008028
DiazMorales, D. M., Bommarito, C., Vajedsamiei, J., Grabner, D. S., Rilov,
G., Wahl, M., & Sures, B. (2022). Heat sensitivity of rst host and cer-
cariae may restrict parasite transmission in a warming sea. Scientic
Reports,12(1), 1174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05139-5
DiazMorales, D. M., Khosravi, M., Grabner, D. S., Nahar, N., Bommarito, C.,
Wahl, M., & Sures, B. (2023). The trematode Podocotyle atomon mod-
ulates biochemical responses of Gammarus locusta to thermal stress but
not its feeding rate or survival. Science of the Total Environment,
858(Part 3), 159946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159946
Dunn, A. M., Terry, R. S., & Smith, J. E. (2001). Transovarial transmission in
the microsporidia. Advances in Parasitology,48,57100. https://doi.org/
10.1016/s0065-308x(01)48005-5
ElSeify, M. A., Zaki, M. S., Desouky, A. R. Y., Abbas, H. H., Abdel Hady,
O. K., & Abou Zaid, A. A. (2011). Study on clinopathological and
biochemical changes in some freshwater shes infected with external
parasites and subjected to heavy metals pollution in Egypt. Life Science
Journal,8(3), 401405.
Erasmus, J. H., Wepener, V., Nachev, M., Zimmermann, S., Malherbe, W.,
Sures, B., & Smit, N. J. (2020). The role of sh helminth parasites in
monitoring metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A case study in the
world's most productive platinum mining region. Parasitology Research,
119(9), 27832798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06813-1
Esch, G. W., Barger, M. A., & Fellis, K. J. (2002). The transmission of dige-
netic trematodes: Style, elegance, complexity. Integrative and Com-
parative Biology,42(2), 304312. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.2.304
Parasites and pollutantsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114 11
wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2023 The Authors
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Ford, A. T., & Fernandes, T. F. (2005). Better the devil you know? A pre-
cautionary approach to using amphipods and daphnids in endocrine
disruptor studies. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,24(5),
10191021. https://doi.org/10.1897/04-363r.1
Ford, A. T., Fernandes, T. F., Robinson, C. D., Davies, I. M., & Read, P. A.
(2006). Can industrial pollution cause intersexuality in the amphipod,
Echinogammarus marinus?Marine Pollution Bulletin,53(14), 100106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.09.040
Franceschi, N., Bauer, A., Bollache, L., & Rigaud, T. (2008). The effects of
parasite age and intensity on variability in acanthocephalaninduced
behavioural manipulation. International Journal for Parasitology,38(10),
11611170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.01.003
Frank, S. N., Godehardt, S., Nachev, M., Trubiroha, A., Kloas, W., & Sures,
B. (2013). Inuence of the cestode Ligula intestinalis and the acantho-
cephalan Polymorphus minutus on levels of heat shock proteins (HSP70)
and metallothioneins in their sh and crustacean intermediate hosts.
Environmental Pollution,180, 173179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.
2013.05.014
Fu, P. P., Xiong, F., Wu, S. G., Zou, H., Li, M., Wang, G. T., & Li, W. X. (2022).
Effects of Schyzocotyle acheilognathi (Yamaguti, 1934) infection on the
intestinal microbiota, growth and immune reactions of grass carp (Cte-
nopharyngodon idella). PLoS One,17(4), e0266766. https://doi.org/10.
1371/journal.pone.0266766
Gheorghiu, C., Marcogliese, D. J., & Scott, M. E. (2012). Waterborne zinc
alters temporal dynamics of guppy Poecilia reticulata epidermal re-
sponse to Gyrodactylus turnbulli (Monogenea). Diseases of Aquatic
Organisms,98(2), 143153. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02434
Giari, L., Fano, E. A., Castaldelli, G., Grabner, D., & Sures, B. (2020). The
ecological importance of amphipodparasite associations for aquatic
ecosystems. Water,12(9), 2429. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092429
Gilbert, B. M., & AvenantOldewage, A. (2021). Monogeneans as bio-
indicators: A metaanalysis of effect size of contaminant exposure to-
ward Monogenea (Platyhelminthes). Ecological Indicators,130, 108062.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108062
Gismondi, E., Beisel, J. N., & CossuLeguille, C. (2012). Polymorphus minutus
affects antitoxic responses of Gammarus roeseli exposed to cadmium.
PLoS One,7(7), e41475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041475
Gismondi, E., CossuLeguille, C., & Beisel, J. N. (2012). Acanthocephalan
parasites: Help or burden in gammarid amphipods exposed to cad-
mium? Ecotoxicology,21(4), 11881193. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10646-012-0873-8
Gismondi, E., CossuLeguille, C., & Beisel, J. N. (2013). Do male and female
gammarids defend themselves differently during chemical stress?
Aquatic Toxicology,140141, 432438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
aquatox.2013.07.006
Gismondi, E., Fivet, A., & JoaquimJusto, C. (2017). Effects of cyproterone
acetate and vertically transmitted microsporidia parasite on Gammarus
pulex sperm production. Environmental Science and Pollution Research
International,24(29), 2341723421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-
0162-4
Gismondi, E., Rigaud, T., Beisel, J. N., & CossuLeguille, C. (2012a). Effect of
multiple parasitic infections on the tolerance to pollutant contamination.
PLoS One,7(7), e41950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041950
Gismondi, E., Rigaud, T., Beisel, J. N., & CossuLeguille, C. (2012b). Mi-
crosporidia parasites disrupt the responses to cadmium exposure in a
gammarid. Environmental Pollution,160(1), 1723. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.envpol.2011.09.021
Grabner, D., Schertzinger, G., & Sures, B. (2014). Effect of multiple micro-
sporidian infections and temperature stress on the heat shock protein 70
(hsp70) response of the amphipod Gammarus pulex.Parasites & Vectors,
7,170.
Grabner, D., & Sures, B. (2019). Amphipod parasites may bias results of
ecotoxicological research. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms,136(1),
123134. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03355
Gutiérrez, J. S., & Hoole, D. (2022). Ligula intestinalis. Trends in Para-
sitology,38(4), 344345. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PT.2021.09.005
Haine, E. R., Motreuil, S., & Rigaud, T. (2007). Infection by a vertically
transmitted microsporidian parasite is associated with a femalebiased
sex ratio and survival advantage in the amphipod Gammarus
roeseli.Parasitology,134(Part 10), 13631367. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S0031182007002715
Heinonen, J., Kukkonen, J. V., & Holopainen, I. J. (2001). Temperatureand
parasiteinduced changes in toxicity and lethal body burdens of
pentachlorophenol in the freshwater clam Pisidium amnicum.Environ-
mental Toxicology and Chemistry,20(12), 27782784. https://doi.org/
10.1002/etc.5620201217
Helluy, S. (2013). Parasiteinduced alterations of sensorimotor pathways in
gammarids: Collateral damage of neuroinammation? Journal of Ex-
perimental Bioliogy,216(Part 1), 6777. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.
073213
Hodgkin, J., & Partridge, F. A. (2008). Caenorhabditis elegans meets
Microsporidia: The nematode killers from Paris. PLoS Biology,6(12),
e1000005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000005
Hudson, P. J., Dobson, A. P., & Lafferty, K. D. (2006). Is a healthy eco-
system one that is rich in parasites? Trends in Ecology and Evolution
(Personal Edition),21(7), 381385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.
04.007
Jackson, M. C., Loewen, C. J., Vinebrooke, R. D., & Chimimba, C. T. (2016).
Net effects of multiple stressors in freshwater ecosystems: A meta
analysis. Global Chang Biology,22(1), 180189. https://doi.org/10.1111/
gcb.13028
Jacquin, L., Mori, Q., Pause, M., Steffen, M., & Medoc, V. (2014). Non
specic manipulation of gammarid behaviour by P. minutus parasite
enhances their predation by denitive bird hosts. PLoS One,9(7),
e101684. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101684
Jobling, S., & Tyler, C. R. (2003). Endocrine disruption, parasites and
pollutants in wild freshwater sh. Parasitology,126(Suppl), S103108.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182003003652.
Kennedy, C. R. (2006). Ecology of the Acanthocephala. Cambridge
University Press.
Kent, M. L., Andree, K. B., Bartholomew, J. L., ElMatbouli, M., Desser, S. S.,
Devlin, R. H., Feist, S. W., Hedrick, R. P., Hoffmann, R. W., Khattra, J.,
Hallett, S. L., Lester, R. J. G., Longshaw, M., Palenzeula, O., Siddall, M.
E., & Xiao, C. (2001). Recent advances in our knowledge of the Myxozoa.
The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology,48(4), 395413.
Kent, M. L., Sanders, J. L., Spagnoli, S., AlSamarrie, C. E., & Murray, K. N.
(2020). Review of diseases and health management in zebrash Danio
rerio (Hamilton 1822) in research facilities. Journal of Fish Diseases,
43(6), 637650. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13165
Kontchou, J. A., Baetz, N., Grabner, D., Nachev, M., Tuerk, J., & Sures, B.
(2023). Pollutant load and ecotoxicological effects of sediment from
stormwater retention basins to receiving surface water on Lumbriculus
variegatus.Science of the Total Environment,859(Part 2), 160185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160185
Koprivnikar, J., & Walker, P. A. (2011). Effects of the herbicide atrazine's
metabolites on host snail mortality and production of trematode cer-
cariae. Journal of Parasitology,97(5), 822827. https://doi.org/10.1645/
GE-2814.1
Lewis, S. E., Freund, J. G., Wankowski, J. L., & Baldridge, M. G. (2015).
Correlations between estrogen and testosterone concentrations,
pairing status and acanthocephalan infection in an amphipod. Journal of
Zoology,298(4), 241248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12309
Link, M., Schreiner, V. C., Graf, N., Szocs, E., Bundschuh, M., Battes, K. P.,
Cimpean, M., Sures, B., Grabner, D., Buse, J., & Schafer, R. B. (2022).
Pesticide effects on macroinvertebrates and leaf litter decomposition
in areas with traditional agriculture. Science of the Total Environment,
828, 154549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154549
MacLeod, C. D., & Poulin, R. (2016a). Parasitic infection alters
the physiological response of a marine gastropod to ocean
acidication. Parasitology,143(11), 13971408. https://doi.org/10.
1017/S0031182016000913
MacLeod, C. D., & Poulin, R. (2016b). Parasitic infection: A buffer against
ocean acidication? Biology Letters,12(5), 20160007. https://doi.org/10.
1098/rsbl.2016.0007
Marcogliese, D. J. (2004). Parasites: Small players with crucial roles in the
ecological theater. EcoHealth,1(2), 151164. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10393-004-0028-3
Marcogliese, D. J. (2005). Parasites of the superorganism: Are they in-
dicators of ecosystem health? International Journal for Parasitology,
35(7), 705716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.01.015
Marcogliese, D. J., Brambilla, L. G., Gagne, F., & Gendron, A. D. (2005).
Joint effects of parasitism and pollution on oxidative stress biomarkers in
yellow perch Perca avescens.Diseases of Aquatic Organisms,63(1),
7784. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao063077
Marcogliese, D. J., Dautremepuits, C., Gendron, A. D., & Fournier, M.
(2010). Interactions between parasites and pollutants in yellow perch
12 Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114Grabner et al.
© 2023 The Authors wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
(Perca avescens) in the St. Lawrence River, Canada: Implications for
resistance and tolerance to parasites. Canadian Journal of Zoology,
88(3), 247258. https://doi.org/10.1139/z09-140
Marcogliese, D. J., King, K. C., & Bates, K. A. (2021). Effects of multiple
stressors on northern leopard frogs in agricultural wetlands. Para-
sitology,148(7), 827834. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118202100038X
Marcogliese, D. J., & Pietrock, M. (2011). Combined effects of parasites
and contaminants on animal health: Parasites do matter. Trends in
Parasitology,27(3), 123130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2010.11.002
Minguez, L., Meyer, A., Molloy, D. P., & Giamberini, L. (2009). Interactions
between parasitism and biological responses in zebra mussels (Dreissena
polymorpha): Importance in ecotoxicological studies. Environmental
Research,109(7), 843850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2009.07.012
Molbert, N., Agostini, S., Alliot, F., Angelier, F., Biard, C., Decenciere, B.,
LerouxCoyau, M., Millot, A., Ribout, C., & Goutte, A. (2021). Parasitism
reduces oxidative stress of sh host experimentally exposed to PAHs.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,219, 112322. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112322
Molbert, N., Alliot, F., LerouxCoyau, M., Médoc, V., Biard, C., Meylan, S.,
Jacquin, L., Santos, R., & Goutte, A. (2020). Potential benets of acan-
thocephalan parasites for chub hosts in polluted environments. Envi-
ronmental Science & Technology,54(9), 55405549. https://doi.org/10.
1021/acs.est.0c00177
Moravec, F., & Skorikova, B. (1998). Amphibians and larvae of aquatic
insects as new paratenic hosts of Anguillicola crassus (Nematoda:
Dracunculoidea), a swimbladder parasite of eels. Diseases of Aquatic
Organisms,34, 217222.
Morley, N. J. (2006). Parasitism as a source of potential distortion in studies
on endocrine disrupting chemicals in molluscs. Marine Pollution Bulletin,
52(11), 13301332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.08.025
Nachev, M., & Sures, B. (2016). Environmental parasitology: Parasites as
accumulation bioindicators in the marine environment. Journal of Sea
Research,113,4550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2015.06.005
Øverli, Ø., & Johansen, I. B. (2019). Kindness to the nal host and vice versa:
A trend for parasites providing easy prey? Frontiers in Ecology and
Evolution,7(50). https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00050
Pascoe, D., & Cram, P. (1977). The effect of parasitism on the toxicity of
cadmium to the threespined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L.
Journal of Fish Biology,10, 467472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-
8649.1977.tb04079.x
PerrotMinnot, M. J., Cozzarolo, C. S., Amin, O., Barčák, D., Bauer, A., Fil-
ipovićMarijić, V., GarcíaVarela, M., Hernández Orts, J. S., Le, T. T. Y.,
Nachev, M., Orosová, M., Rigaud, T., Šariri, S., Wattier, R., Reyda, F., &
Sures, B. (2023). Hooking the scientic community on thornyheaded
worms: Interesting and exciting facts, knowledge gaps and perspectives
for research directions on Acanthocephala. Parasite,30, 23. https://doi.
org/10.1051/parasite/2023026
Piscart, C., Webb, D., & Beisel, J. N. (2007). An acanthocephalan parasite
increases the salinity tolerance of the freshwater amphipod Gammarus
roeseli (Crustacea: Gammaridae). Naturwissenschaften,94(9), 741747.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0252-0
Poulin, R. (1992). Toxic pollution and parasitism in freshwater sh. Parasitology
Today,8(2), 5861. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4758(92)90090-o
Poulin, R. (1999). The functional importance of parasites in animal commun-
ities: Many roles at many levels? International Journal for Parasitology,
29(6), 903914. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00045-4
Poulin, R. (2014). Parasite biodiversity revisited: Frontiers and constraints.
International Journal for Parasitology,44(9), 581589. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.ijpara.2014.02.003
Poulin, R., & Morand, S. (2004). Parasite biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution
Books.
Rothe, L. E., Loefer, F., Gerhardt, A., Feld, C. K., Stift, R., Weyand, M.,
Grabner, D., & Sures, B. (2022). Parasite infection inuences the bio-
marker response and locomotor activity of Gammarus fossarum exposed
to conventionallytreated wastewater. Ecotoxicology and Environmental
Safety,236, 113474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113474
Sánchez, M. I., Pons, I., MartínezHaro, M., Taggart, M. A., Lenormand, T., &
Green, A. J. (2016). When parasites are good for health: Cestode par-
asitism increases resistance to arsenic in brine shrimps. PLoS Pathogens,
12,119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005459
SanchezRamirez, C., VidalMartínez, V. M., AguirreMacedo, M. L., Rodriguez
Canul, R. P., GoldBouchot,G.,&Sures,B.(2007).Cichlidogyrus
sclerosus (Monogenea: Ancyrocephalinae) and its host, the Nile tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus), as bioindicators of chemical pollution. Journal of
Parasitology,93, 10971106. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1162R.1
Sanders, J. L., Watral, V., & Kent, M. L. (2012). Microsporidiosis in zebrash
research facilities. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal,
53(2), 106113. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.53.2.106
Schabuss, M., Gemeiner, M., Gleiss, A., Lewis, J. W., Miller, I., Mostl, E.,
Schober, U., Tschulenk, W., Walter, I., & Grillitsch, B. (2005). Ligula in-
testinalis infection as a potential source of bias in the bioindication
of endocrine disruption in the European chub Leuciscus cephalus.Journal
of Helminthology,79(1), 9194. https://doi.org/10.1079/joh2004268
Schertzinger, G., Zimmermann, S., Grabner, D., & Sures, B. (2017). As-
sessment of sublethal endpoints after chronic exposure of the nematode
Caenorhabditis elegans to palladium, platinum and rhodium. Environ-
mental Pollution,230,3139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.
06.040
Short, S., Yang, G., Guler, Y., Green Etxabe, A., Kille, P., & Ford, A. T.
(2014). Crustacean intersexuality is feminization without demasculiniza-
tion: Implications for environmental toxicology. Environmental Science
& Technology,48(22), 1352013529. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5050503
Smith, J. E. (2009). The ecology and evolution of microsporidian
parasites. Parasitology,136(14), 19011914. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S0031182009991818
Stentiford, G. D., & Dunn, A. M. (2014). Microsporidia in aquatic in-
vertebrates. In L. M. Weiss & J. Becnel (Eds.), Microsporidia: Pathogens
of opportunity (pp. 579604). John Wiley & Sons.
Stirnadel, H. A., & Ebert, D. (1997). Prevalence, host specicity and impact
on host fecundity of microparasites and epibionts in three sympatric
Daphnia species. Journal of Animal Ecology,66, 212222.
Sures, B. (2006). How parasitism and pollution affect the physiological
homeostasis of aquatic hosts. Journal of Helminthology,80(2), 151157.
https://doi.org/10.1079/joh2006346
Sures, B. (2008a). Environmental parasitology. Interactions between para-
sites and pollutants in the aquatic environment. Parasite,15(3), 434438.
https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2008153434
Sures, B. (2008b). Hostparasite interactions in polluted environments.
Journal of Fish Biology,73(9), 21332142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.
1095-8649.2008.02057.x
Sures, B., & Knopf, K. (2004). Parasites as a threat to freshwater eels? Sci-
ence,304, 209211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.304.5668.209
Sures, B., Lutz, I., & Kloas, W. (2006). Effects of infection with Anguillicola
crassus and simultaneous exposure with Cd and 3,3,4,4,5
pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB 126) on the levels of cortisol and glucose in
European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Parasitology,132(Part 2), 281288.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182005009017
Sures, B., & Nachev, M. (2022). Effects of multiple stressors in sh: How
parasites and contaminants interact. Parasitology,149, 18221828.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182022001172
Sures, B., Nachev, M., Pahl, M., Grabner, D., & Selbach, C. (2017). Parasites
as drivers of key processes in aquatic ecosystems: Facts and future
directions. Experimental Parasitology,180, 141147. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.exppara.2017.03.011
Sures, B., Nachev, M., Schwelm, J., Grabner, D., & Selbach, C. (2023). En-
vironmental parasitology: Stressor effects on aquatic parasites. Trends in
Parasitology,39, 461474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2023.03.005
Sures, B., Nachev, M., Selbach, C., & Marcogliese, D. J. (2017). Parasite
responses to pollution: What we know and where we go in Environ-
mental Parasitology.Parasites & Vectors,10(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.
1186/s13071-017-2001-3
Sures, B., & Radszuweit, H. (2007). Pollutioninduced heat shock protein
expression in the amphipod Gammarus roeseli is affected by larvae of
Polymorphus minutus (Acanthocephala). Journal of Helminthology,
81(2), 191197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X07751465
Taraschewski, H. (2000). Hostparasite interactions in Acanthocephala: A
morphological approach. Advances in Parasitology,46,1179. https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(00)46008-2
Tekmedash, F. S., Hemmatzadeh, M., & Khara, H. (2016). Stress indices of
grass carp, Ceteopharyngodon idella, (Cuvier and Valenciennes, 1884)
change in response to Monogenean parasites pollution, Gyrodactylus
spp. and Dactylogyrus spp. Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Ofcial Organ
of the Indian Society for Parasitology,40(3), 10441046. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s12639-014-0632-2
Thilakaratne, I. D. S. I. P., McLaughlin, J. D., & Marcogliese, D. J. (2007).
Effects of pollution and parasites on biomarkers of sh health in spottail
Parasites and pollutantsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114 13
wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC © 2023 The Authors
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
shiners Notropis hudsonius (Clinton). Journal of Fish Biology,71(2),
519538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01511.x
Thomas, F., Poulin, R., Guégan, J. F., Michalakis, Y., & Renaud, F. (2000).
Are there pros as well as cons to being parasitized? Parasitology Today,
16(12), 533536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4758(00)01790-7
Thomas, J. D. (2002). The ecology of sh parasites with particular reference
to helminth parasites and their salmonid sh hosts in Welsh rivers: A
review of some of the central questions. Advances in Parasitology,52,
1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-308x(02)52011-x
Thomas, K., & Ollevier, F. (1992). Paratenic hosts of the swimbladder
nematode Anguillicola crassus.Diseases of Aquatic Organisms,13,
165174.
Timi, J. T., & Poulin, R. (2020). Why ignoring parasites in sh ecology is a
mistake. International Journal for Parasitology,50(1011), 755761.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.04.007
Tompkins, D. M., Dunn, A. M., Smith, M. J., & Telfer, S. (2011). Wildlife
diseases: From individuals to ecosystems. Journal of Animal Ecology,
80(1), 1938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01742.x
Trubiroha, A., Kroupova, H., Würtz, S., Frank, S. N., Sures, B., & Kloas, W.
(2010). Naturallyinduced endocrine disruption by the parasite Ligula
intestinalis (Cestoda) in roach (Rutilus rutilus). General and Comparative
Endocrinology,166, 234240.
Trubiroha, A., Wuertz, S., Frank, S. N., Sures, B., & Kloas, W. (2009). Ex-
pression of gonadotropin subunits in roach (Rutilus rutilus, Cyprinidae)
infected with plerocercoids of the tapeworm Ligula intestinalis (Ces-
toda). International Journal for Parasitology,39(13), 14651473. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.05.003
Vos, M., Hering, D., Gessner, M. O., Leese, F., Schäfer, R. B., Tollrian, R.,
Boenigk, J., Haase, P., Meckenstock, R., Baikova, D., Bayat, H., Beer-
mann, A., Beißer, D., Beszteri, B., Birk, S., Boden, L., Brauer, V., Brauns,
M., Buchner, D., Sures, B. (2023). The Asymmetric Response Concept
explains and predicts ecological consequences of multiple stressor ex-
posure and release. Science of the Total Environment, in press. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162196
Wood, C. L., & Johnson, P. T. (2015). A world without parasites: Exploring
the hidden ecology of infection. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environ-
ment,13(8), 425434. https://doi.org/10.1890/140368
Yang, G., Kille, P., & Ford, A. T. (2008). Infertility in a marine crustacean:
Have we been ignoring pollution impacts on male invertebrates?
Aquatic Toxicology,88(1), 8187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.
2008.03.008
14 Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2023;00:114Grabner et al.
© 2023 The Authors wileyonlinelibrary.com/ETC
15528618, 0, Downloaded from https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.5689 by Cochrane Germany, Wiley Online Library on [08/07/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
... However, scientists have recently emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary work to untangle the knots of stressor interaction that contribute to biodiversity loss (Sigmund et al., 2023;Sylvester et al., 2023). This also involves broadening the focus to include locally relevant species groups, ecological interactions and significant evolutionary processes (Grabner et al., 2023;Jourdan et al., 2023;Sylvester et al., 2023). ...
... For example, infected G. roeselii showed escape mechanisms that prevented predation of a non-host crustacean predator (Dikerogammarus villosus) but still allowed increased predation by potential final vertebrate hosts (Médoc et al., 2006). Another aspect that has hardly been considered in the past is that parasites can influence the outcomes of ecotoxicological studieswhich is problematic if the infection of a test species remains unknown (Grabner et al., 2023). A very recent example of significantly altered tolerance comes from Acanthocephala-infected G. roeselii (Kochmann et al., 2023): In an acute toxicity assay with the pyrethroid deltamethrin, infected G. roeselii showed significantly lower toxicity compared to uninfected individuals within the first 72 h of the test. ...
... The combination of different micropollutants can induce severe mixture effects even if critical concentrations of single compounds are not reached in the environment (Backhaus, 2014(Backhaus, , 2023Kidd et al., 2023). Additionally, there are multiple other stressors (climate change, invasive species, chemical pollution, parasitation) to consider that cause adverse effects for ecosystems (Bundschuh et al., 2020;Grabner et al., 2023;Groh et al., 2022;Kochmann et al., 2023;Siddique et al., 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Increasing chemical pollution calls for a closer look at ecologically highly relevant host-parasite interactions to understand the persistence of organisms and populations in a polluted environment. The impact of chemical exposure within the host-parasite interactions – particularly the distinctive bioaccumulation behavior of organic micropollutants – can substantially influence the persistence of a species. This significance has been emphasized by previous research showing a higher tolerance of Gammarus roeselii (Amphipoda, Crustacea) infected with acanthocephalans during acute exposure to a pyrethroid. This suggests the presence of infection-related benefits within polluted environments. The present study addressed this complex relationship by investigating the chemical body burden and internal pollutant concentrations of both G. roeselii and its acanthocephalan parasites across a pollution gradient. Specifically, we analyzed 405 organic micropollutants and identified 123 of these in gammarids and their acanthocephalan parasites. Among the detected compounds, 22 are either banned or are no longer permitted for use in Germany. Remarkably, we discovered that the concentrations of pollutants were up to 35 times higher in the acanthocephalan parasites than in their crustacean intermediate hosts. The log KOW, the most frequently used measure of chemical hydrophobicity, could not explain the accumulation. Instead, the accumulation is likely explained by the unique physiology and high absorption capacity of acanthocephalans, combined with potentially limited biotransformation and excretion ability. This results in a redistribution of micropollutants within the host-parasite system, reducing the burden on the host up to 13.9% and potentially explaining the observed helpful effects of parasitized G. roeselii in polluted environments. Our study underscores the often overlooked but significant role of host-parasite interactions in human-altered ecosystems, revealing how these relationships can mediate and amplify the impacts of micropollutants within aquatic communities. These insights stress the need to consider the pervasive influence of metazoan parasites in environmental assessments and pollution management strategies.
... In both aquaculture and wild fisheries, fish are highly susceptible to a variety of diseases. Moreover, a variety of parasites have been linked to zoonotic illnesses worldwide even in seemingly healthy fish [17,18]. Pollution and parasitism are related, and parasites can serve as bioindicators for heavy metal contamination [18,19]. ...
... Moreover, a variety of parasites have been linked to zoonotic illnesses worldwide even in seemingly healthy fish [17,18]. Pollution and parasitism are related, and parasites can serve as bioindicators for heavy metal contamination [18,19]. Previous reports have addressed the ability of some parasites to accumulate heavy metal from their hosts, such as Acanthocephalans, cestodes, and parasitic nematodes [20,21]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The study aims to assess the overall safety of cultured tilapias in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia by assessing the impact of infection and anthropogenic pollution on farmed tilapias based on fish sex, body weight, length, and heavy metals contamination. Materials and methods: A total of 111 fish were collected from an aquaculture farm in Hada Al-Sham, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Physicochemical parameters of water from the culture system were evaluated. Both ecto- and endoparasites were checked. Haematological, biochemical and histopathological investigations were evaluated. In addition, heavy metals, namely, cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) were evaluated in different fish tissues and water samples from the aquaculture system. Results: The study revealed stressed aquaculture system. Tilapias were infested by both ectoparasites including Trichodina, Icthyophthirius multifiliis, Dactylogrus, and Cichlidogyrus, and endoparasites as Icthyophonus hoferi, the nematode Capillaria and coccidian protozoa. The study showed that male tilapias had greater infestation rates than females and longer and heavier male fish tended to be more susceptible to Dactylogyrus infection. Infected fish showed altered biochemical markers with subsequent increases in inflammatory and oxidative stress markers. The post-mortem lesion in the skin, gill lamellae, intestine, spleen, and liver showed significant pathological remarks. All investigated fish tissues revealed higher rates of heavy metals bioaccumulation compared to the surrounding waters. On the other hand, infected Nile tilapia tissues showed higher rate of metals accumulation compared to non-infected ones. Metals accumulated at a higher rate in the liver followed by kidney, intestine, gills, and muscles, respectively. Conclusions: This study is recognized as the first to address the food safety of farmed tilapias in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The results emphasized a significant relation between parasites and heavy metal in disrupting fish defense systems and harming fish’s physiological homeostasis and the histological state of tissues. The parasitized and polluted farmed fish pose health risk to humans due to possible zoonosis from parasitic infections and its subsequent bacterial infections with long-term exposure to toxic chemicals. Addressing the need for a combination of improved aquaculture practices, and stringent regulatory oversight.
... Parasites are important natural stressors that have an impact on the development, reproduction, and lifespan of their host. Chemical stressors may potentially intensify the damaging effects of a parasite infection or, conversely, reduce infection rates by increasing in parasite vulnerability [9][10][11] . Goutte and Molbert 12 emphasise that interactions between parasite and contaminant are complex and influenced by both biological and environmental factors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Marine organisms are increasingly exposed to a combination of environmental stressors. However, most studies focus on single factors, limiting our understanding of real-world ecological challenges. This study investigates the combined effects of metal pollution, parasites, pathogens, and environmental variables on the health of Perumytilus purpuratus, a mussel species inhabiting the coast of northern Chile. The upwelling system in this area, combined with low water turnover, creates a unique environment in which to study how multiple factors interact. Mussels were sampled from several sites affected by metal discharges. Analyses revealed that individuals from central and northern sites exhibited the highest levels of parasites, pathogens, and tissue lesions. These health impacts were strongly associated with elevated pH, salinity, cadmium and copper concentrations in the water. Findings emphasise the synergistic effects of chemical and abiotic factors, underscoring the importance of incorporating multiple factors interactions into monitoring programmes. Such an approach can enhance predictions of ecological responses, inform conservation efforts, and guide policies addressing global challenges like aquatic pollution. Our study provides critical insights into how combined factors threaten aquatic ecosystems, offering a framework for more comprehensive environmental assessment.
... Environmental pollutants, however, may inhibit viral replication and influence microbial community dynamics. Studies suggest that viruses play an integral role in transferring metabolic genes, thereby impacting microbial community structure and function [56,57]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Chemical exposure in the environment can adversely affect the biodiversity of living organisms, particularly when persistent chemicals accumulate over time and disrupt the balance of microbial populations. In this study, we examined how chemical contaminants influence microorganisms in sediment and overlaying water samples collected from the Kinnickinnic, Milwaukee, and Menomonee Rivers near Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. We characterized these samples using shotgun metagenomic sequencing to assess microbiome diversity and employed chemical analyses to quantify more than 200 compounds spanning 16 broad classes, including pesticides, industrial products, personal care products, and pharmaceuticals. Integrative and differential comparative analyses of the combined datasets revealed that microbial density, approximated by adjusted total sequence reads, declined with increasing total chemical concentrations. Protozoan, metazoan, and fungal populations were negatively correlated with higher chemical concentrations, whereas certain bacterial (particularly Proteobacteria) and archaeal populations showed positive correlations. As expected, sediment samples exhibited higher concentrations and a wider dynamic range of chemicals compared to water samples. Varying levels of chemical contamination appeared to shape the distribution of microbial taxa, with some bacterial, metazoan, and protozoan populations present only at certain sites or in specific sample types (sediment versus water). These findings suggest that microbial diversity may be linked to both the type and concentration of chemicals present. Additionally, this study demonstrates the potential roles of multiple microbial kingdoms in degrading environmental pollutants, emphasizing the metabolic versatility of bacteria and archaea in processing complex contaminants such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons and bisphenols. Through functional and resistance gene profiling, we observed that multi-kingdom microbial consortia—including bacteria, fungi, and protozoa—can contribute to bioremediation strategies and help restore ecological balance in contaminated ecosystems. This approach may also serve as a valuable proxy for assessing the types and levels of chemical pollutants, as well as their effects on biodiversity.
... Acanthocephalans have complex lifecycles that involve multiple hosts, including aquatic invertebrates as intermediate hosts (Duarte et al., 2020;Schmidt, 1971;Sures, 2015), and fish or birds as definitive hosts (Giari et al., 2020;Grabner et al., 2023). The acanthocephalan Polymorphus minutus (Lühe, 1911;Zeder, 1800) is commonly found in G. fossarum . ...
... Parasites are another stressor for marine animals, though often underestimated (Sures and Nachev, 2022;Timi and Poulin, 2020). Notably, ecotoxicological studies can be flawed if parasite infestations go unnoticed (Grabner et al., 2023). Parasite infestations reduce host fitness by triggering pathological and physiological responses (Gérard et al., 2016, and reviewed by Sures and Nachev, 2022). ...
Article
The ontogenetic bioaccumulation of trace elements in marine species is influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors , including parasitic infestation. The Mackerel icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) plays a significant role in the Antarctic ecosystem. Yet the impact of parasites on trace element accumulation in this species remains unclear. This study aims to gain insight into the ontogenetic accumulation patterns of trace elements in C. gunnari and how parasitic infestations affect these patterns. Two ectoparasites (Eubrachiella antarctica and Notobdella notothe-niae) were found on C. gunnari, but no endoparasites were detected. Concentrations of 34 elements in C. gunnari were analyzed, including essential elements (e.g. Yb). Major essential elements, such as magnesium (Mg, 1420-2380 μg g −1) and calcium (Ca, 436-1850 μg g −1), were significantly higher than minor elements like zinc (Zn, 19.5-29.3 μg g −1) and iron (Fe, 6.59-19.4 μg g −1) in both infested and non-infested fish. Strontium (Sr), though a non-essential element exhibited concentrations comparable to Fe of ranging from 2.45 to 13.6 μg g −1. Although the rare earth elements were detected, their concentrations were significantly lower, several orders of magnitude below those of the major and trace elements. Scandium (Sc, 0.06-0.27 μg g −1) was the only rare earth element comparable in magnitude to certain trace elements. Parasitic infestation altered the relationships between certain elements (e.g., P, Zn, and Dy) and fish length, as well as (e.g., Li, Co, Cu, and Sr) with fish weight. Nevertheless, all elements displayed consistent relationships with the condition factor, regardless of parasitic infestation, indicating that it remains a reliable indicator of trace element bioaccumulation in C. gunnari, even in the presence of ectoparasites.
... Its decomposition releases mature acanthors into the water environment. The life cycle continues when they are eaten by a suitable intermediate host (Grabner et al., 2023). One of the main problems in studying the species distribution of the Acanthocephala is their complex taxonomy, which can lead and/or has led to misidentifications in the past (Perrot-Minnot et al., 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of our study was to investigate the genetic variability of two members of two evolutionary different classes of the Acanthocephala, Eoacanthocephala ( Neoechinirhynchus sp.) and Palaeacanthocephala ( Acanthocephalus sp.) from the same host, Squalius cephalus , from rivers of the Adriatic (rivers in Lika region: Lika, Novčica, Bogdanica and Jadova) and the Black Sea basins (Medsave location on the Sava River) in Croatia. The samples were collected from May 2021 to July 2022. To put the genetic position of the analyzed acanthocephalans in a broader context, the COI sequences of other specimens from the NCBI GenBank were used. BLAST analysis of partial COI sequences of acanthocephalans showed the presence of two different species: Acanthocephalus sp. and Neoechinorhynchus sp. Acanthocephalus sp. specimens did not show different grouping related to geographical origin (Bogdanica, Lika, Jadova) or Black Sea basin (Medsave-Sava River). Acanthocephalus cluster was subdivided into five main subclusters and 13 haplotypes were determined. When we compared our haplotypes with those from the NCBI GenBank, our haplotypes were closer to the A. anguillae specimens from the Kupa River and Dobra River in Croatia, and also to the haplotypes from Austria. For the species Neoechinorhynchus sp. from the Lika River and the specimens from the NCBI GenBank, four haplotypes were found out of five specimens. This genus was recorded for the first time in the Lika River area and for the first time in European chub in Croatia. The closest species Neoechinorhynchus sp. from Austria and Finland were grouped separately. Due to the lack of NCBI GenBank data for this species from other geographical regions, our data could not be compared. This shows that the taxonomy of the genus Neoechinorhynchus from Europe remains a challenge and underlines the need for further DNA sequence data and in-depth morphological study.
... In Europe, Pomphorhynchus laevis, P. tereticollis, and Polymorphus minutus appear to be the most prevalent aquatic Acanthocephala (Schmidt-Rhaesa, 2015). The role of these infections in the face of chemical pollution is recently discussed as potentially advantageous, as ecotoxicological studies have observed higher survival rates of infected amphipods in the presence of chemical pollution (Grabner et al., 2023;Kochmann et al., 2023). Kochmann et al. (2023) further observed exceptional high prevalences (up to 73% mainly P. laevis) of G. roeselii in a polluted river. ...
Article
Native and invasive species often occupy similar ecological niches and environments where they face comparable risks from chemical exposure. Sometimes, invasive species are phylogenetically related to native species, e.g. they may come from the same family and have potentially similar sensitivities to environmental stressors due to phylogenetic conservatism and ecological similarity. However, empirical studies that aim to understand the nuanced impacts of chemicals on the full range of closely related species are rare, yet they would help to comprehend patterns of current biodiversity loss and species turnover. Behavioral sublethal endpoints are of increasing ecotoxicological interest. Therefore, we investigated behavioral responses (i.e., change in movement behavior) of the four dominant amphipod species in the Rhine-Main area (central Germany) when exposed to the neonicotinoid thiacloprid. Moreover, beyond species-specific behavioral responses, ecological interactions (e.g. parasitation with Acanthocephala) play a crucial role in shaping behavior, and we have considered these infections in our analysis. Our findings revealed distinct baseline behaviors and species-specific responses to thiacloprid exposure. Notably, Gammarus fossarum exhibited biphasic behavioral changes with hyperactivity at low concentrations that decreased at higher concentrations. Whereas Gammarus pulex, Gammarus roeselii and the invasive species Dikerogammarus villosus, showed no or weaker behavioral responses. This may partly explain why G. fossarum disappears in chemically polluted regions while the other species persist there to a certain degree. But it also shows that potential pre-exposure in the habitat may influence behavioral responses of the other amphipod species, because habituation occurs, and potential hyperactivity would be harmful to individuals in the habitat. The observed responses were further influenced by acanthocephalan parasites, which altered baseline behavior in G. roeselii and enhanced the behavioral response to thiacloprid exposure. Our results underscore the intricate and diverse nature of responses among closely related amphipod species, highlighting their unique vulnerabilities in anthropogenically impacted freshwater ecosystems.
Article
Full-text available
Aquatic organisms are challenged by changes in their external environment, such as temperature and salinity fluctuations. If these variables interacted with each other, the response of organisms to temperature changes would be modified by salinity and vice versa. We tested for potential interaction between temperature and salinity effects on freshwater, brackish, and marine organisms, including algae, macrophytes, heterotrophic protists, parasites, invertebrates, and fish. We performed a meta-analysis that compared the thermal tolerance (characterised by the temperature optimum, lower and upper temperature limits, and thermal breadth) at various salinities. The meta-analysis was based on 90 articles (algae: 15; heterotrophic protists: 1; invertebrates: 43; and fish: 31). Studies on macrophytes and parasites were lacking. We found that decreasing salinity significantly increased and decreased the lower and upper temperature limits, respectively, in all groups. Thus, a lowered salinity increased the thermal sensitivity of organisms. These findings mainly reflect the response of brackish and marine organisms to salinity changes, which dominated our database. The few studies on freshwater species showed that their lower thermal limits increased and the upper thermal limits decreased with increasing salinity, albeit statistically nonsignificant. Although non-significant, the response of thermal tolerance to salinity changes differed between various organism groups. It generally decreased in the order of: algae > invertebrates > fish. Overall, our findings indicate adverse effects of salinity changes on the temperature tolerance of aquatic organisms. For freshwater species, studies are comparatively scarce and further studies on their thermal performance at various salinity gradients are required to obtain more robust evidence for interactions between salinity and temperature tolerance. Considering test conditions such as acclimation temperature and potential infection with parasites in future studies may decrease the variability in the relationship between salinity and thermal tolerance.
Article
Full-text available
Lake Baikal is one of the largest and oldest freshwater reservoirs on the planet with a huge endemic diversity of amphipods (Amphipoda, Crustacea). These crustaceans have various symbiotic relationships, including the rarely described phenomenon of leech parasitism on amphipods. It is known that leeches feeding on hemolymph of crustacean hosts can influence their physiology, especially under stressful conditions. Here we show that leeches Baicalobdella torquata (Grube, 1871) found on gills of Eulimnogammarus verrucosus (Gerstfeldt, 1858), one of the most abundant amphipods in the Baikal littoral zone, indeed feed on the hemolymph of their host. However, the leech infection had no effect on immune parameters such as hemocyte concentration or phenoloxidase activity and also did not affect glycogen content. The intensity of hemocyte reaction to foreign bodies in a primary culture was identical between leech-free and leech-infected animals. Artificial infection with leeches also had only a subtle effect on the course of a model microbial infection in terms of hemocyte concentration and composition. Despite we cannot fully exclude deleterious effects of the parasites, our study indicates a low influence of a few leeches on E. verrucosus and shows that leech-infected amphipods can be used at least for some types of ecophysiological experiments.
Article
Full-text available
Although interest in Acanthocephala seems to have reached only a small community of researchers worldwide, we show in this opinion article that this group of parasites is composed of excellent model organisms for studying key questions in parasite molecular biology and cytogenetics, evolutionary ecology, and ecotoxicology. Their shared ancestry with free-living rotifers makes them an ideal group to explore the origins of the parasitic lifestyle and evolutionary drivers of host shifts and environmental transitions. They also provide useful features in the quest to decipher the proximate mechanisms of parasite-induced phenotypic alterations and better understand the evolution of behavioral manipulation. From an applied perspective, acanthocephalans’ ability to accumulate contaminants offers useful opportunities to monitor the impacts – and evaluate the possible mitigation – of anthropogenic pollutants on aquatic fauna and develop the environmental parasitology framework. However, exploring these exciting research avenues will require connecting fragmentary knowledge by enlarging the taxonomic coverage of molecular and phenotypic data. In this opinion paper, we highlight the needs and opportunities of research on Acanthocephala in three main directions: (i) integrative taxonomy (including non-molecular tools) and phylogeny-based comparative analysis; (ii) ecology and evolution of life cycles, transmission strategies and host ranges; and (iii) environmental issues related to global changes, including ecotoxicology. In each section, the most promising ideas and developments are presented based on selected case studies, with the goal that the present and future generations of parasitologists further explore and increase knowledge of Acanthocephala.
Article
Full-text available
Our capacity to predict trajectories of ecosystem degradation and recovery is limited, especially when impairments are caused by multiple stressors. Recovery may be fast or slow and either complete or partial, sometimes result in novel ecosystem states or even fail completely. Here, we introduce the Asymmetric Response Concept (ARC) that provides a basis for exploring and predicting the pace and magnitude of ecological responses to, and release from, multiple stressors. The ARC holds that three key mechanisms govern population, community and ecosystem trajectories. Stress tolerance is the main mechanism determining responses to increasing stressor intensity, whereas dispersal and biotic interactions predominantly govern responses to the release from stressors. The shifting importance of these mechanisms creates asymmetries between the ecological trajectories that follow increasing and decreasing stressor intensities. This recognition helps to understand multiple stressor impacts and to predict which measures will restore communities that are resistant to restoration.
Article
Full-text available
Interest in local environmental conditions and the occurrence and behaviour of parasites has increased over the last 3 decades, leading to the discipline of Environmental Parasitology. The aim of this discipline is to investigate how anthropogenically altered environmental factors influence the occurrence of parasites and how the combined effects of pollutants and parasites affect the health of their hosts. Accordingly, in this paper, we provide an overview of the direct and indirect effects of pollutants on the occurrence and distribution of fish parasites. However, based on current knowledge, it is difficult to draw general conclusions about these interdependencies, as the effects of pollutants on free-living (larval) parasite stages, as well as their effects on ectoparasites, depend on the pollutant–host–parasite combination as well as on other environmental factors that can modulate the harmful effects of pollutants. Furthermore, the question of the combined effects of the simultaneous occurrence of parasites and pollutants on the physiology and health of the fish hosts is of interest. For this purpose, we differentiate between the dominance effects of individual stressors over other, additive or synergistically reinforcing effects as well as combined antagonistic effects. For the latter, there are only very few studies, most of which were also carried out on invertebrates, so that this field of research presents itself as very promising for future investigations.
Article
Full-text available
Although parasite infection and pollution are common threats facing wild populations, the response of the gut microbiota to the joint impact of these stressors remains largely understudied. Here, we experimentally investigated the effects of exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and infection by a common acanthocephalan intestinal parasite (Pomphorhynchus sp.) on the gut microbial flora of a freshwater fish, the European chub (Squalius cephalus). Naturally infected or uninfected individuals were exposed to PAHs at environmentally realistic concentrations over a five-week period. Characterization of the gut bacterial community through 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed that parasitic infection was a more structuring factor of bacterial diversity and composition than PAH exposure. Specifically, chub infected by Pomphorhynchus sp. harbored significantly less evenly represented gut bacterial communities than the uninfected ones. In addition, substantial changes in sequence abundance were observed within the main bacterial phyla, including the Firmicutes, Fusobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, and Proteobacteria. Again, these compositional changes correlated with host infection with Pomphorhynchus sp., confirming its pivotal role in gut microbial assemblage. Overall, these results highlight the importance of defining the parasitic status of individuals when conducting microbial ecotoxicological analyses at the digestive tract level, as this should lead to better understanding of microbiota modulations and help to identify microbial markers specifically associated with chemicals.
Article
Full-text available
Our understanding of interactions among intestinal helminths, gut microbiota and host is still in its infancy in fish. In this study, the effects of Schyzocotyle acheilognathi infection on the intestinal microbiota, growth and immune reactions of grass carp were explored under laboratory conditions. 16S rDNA amplification sequencing results showed that S. acheilognathi infection altered the composition of intestinal microbiota only at the genus level, with a significant increase in the relative abundance of Turicibacter and Ruminococcus (P < 0.05) and a significant decrease in the relative abundance of Gordonia, Mycobacterium and Pseudocanthomonas (P < 0.05). Schyzocotyle acheilognathi infection had no significant effect (P > 0.05) on the alpha diversity indices (including Chao1, ACE, Shannon, Simpson index) of intestinal microbiota in grass carp, but PERMANOVA analysis showed that microbial structure significantly (P < 0.01) differed between hindgut and foregut. PICRUST prediction showed that some metabolism-related pathways were significantly changed after S. acheilognathi infection. The relative abundance of Turicibacter was positively correlated with the fresh weight of tapeworm (foregut: r = 0.48, P = 0.044; hindgut: r = 0.63, P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the body condition of grass carp between the S. acheilognathi infected group and the uninfected group (P > 0.05). Intestinal tissue section with HE staining showed that S. acheilognathi infection severely damaged the intestinal villi, causing serious degeneration, necrosis and shedding of intestinal epithelial cells. The real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR results showed that S. acheilognathi infection upregulated the mRNA expression of the immune-related genes: Gal1−L2, TGF−β1 and IgM.
Article
Full-text available
Modern wastewater treatment plants cannot completely remove pollutants. Often, effluents entering the aquatic environment still contain micropollutants such as pharmaceuticals or pesticides, which may impose adverse effects on aquatic biota. At the same time, a large proportion of free-living aquatic species are known to be infected with parasites, which raises the question of interactions between environmental stressors (such as micropollutants) and parasite infection. We chose the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum (Koch, 1835) as a test organism to investigate potential pollutant-parasite interactions. This gammarid is frequently used in ecotoxicological tests and is also commonly infected with larvae of the acanthocephalan parasite species Polymorphus minutus (Zeder, 1800) Lühe, 1911. We exposed infected and uninfected specimens of G. fossarum to conventionally-treated wastewater and river water in a 22-day flow channel experiment. The test organisms’ response was measured as mortality rates, concentrations or activities of five biomarkers, and overall locomotor activity. No significant differences were found between mortality rates of different exposure conditions. Contrastingly, three biomarkers (phenoloxidase activity, glycogen, and lipid concentrations) showed a significant increase in infected gammarids, while the effect of the water type was insignificant. Infected gammarids also showed a significantly higher locomotor activity in both water types. Our results suggest that the response of G. fossarum during the exposure experiments was mainly driven by parasite infection. This implies that parasites may act as additional biotic stressors in multiple stressor scenarios, and therefore, might play an important role when measuring the response of organisms to chemical stressors. Future ecotoxicological studies and assessments thus should consider parasite infection as an additional test parameter.
Article
Anthropogenic stressors are causing fundamental changes in aquatic habitats and to the organisms inhabiting these ecosystems. Yet, we are still far from understanding the diverse responses of parasites and their hosts to these environmental stressors and predicting how these stressors will affect host-parasite communities. Here, we provide an overview of the impacts of major stressors affecting aquatic ecosystems in the Anthropocene (habitat alteration, global warming, and pollution) and highlight their consequences for aquatic parasites at multiple levels of organisation, from the individual to the community level. We provide directions and ideas for future research to better understand responses to stressors in aquatic host-parasite systems.
Article
The overflow of stormwater retention basins during intense and prolonged precipitation events may result in the direct input of particulate pollutants and remobilization of already sedimented particle-bound pollutants to receiving freshwater bodies. Particle-bound pollutants may cause adverse effects on aquatic biota, particularly sediment dwellers. Therefore, we investigated the sediment pollution load of a stream connected to the outfalls of two stormwater basins to determine the impact of the basins' discharges on the metal and organic pollutant content of the sediment. Also, the possible adverse effects of the pollutant load on benthic dwellers were evaluated in sediment toxicity tests with Lumbriculus variegatus and the effects on its growth, reproduction and the biomarkers catalase, acetylcholinesterase and metallothionein were analyzed. The results showed that the retention basins contained the highest load of pollutants. The pollutant load in the stream did not show a clear pollution pattern from the inlets. However, metal enrichment ratios revealed contamination with Cu, Pb and Zn with Pb and Zn above threshold effect concentrations in all sites. Ecotoxicity results showed that the retention basin samples were the most toxic compared to sediment from the stream. Exposure experiments with the stream sediment did not show considerable effects on reproduction, catalase activity and metallothionein concentration. However, modest inhibitions of growth and activity of acetylcholinesterase were detected. Based on the observed results, it cannot be concluded that overflows of the retention basin are responsible for the pollutant contents downstream of their inlet. Other sources that were not considered in this study, such as diffuse input, historic pollution and point sources further upstream as well as along the stream, are likely the major contributors of pollutant load in the sediment of the studied transects of the stream. Additionally, the observed results in the stormwater basin sediment further highlight their importance in retaining particle-bound pollutants and preventing ecotoxicological effects from receiving surface water bodies.
Article
Although parasitism is one of the most common species interactions in nature, the role of parasites in their hosts' thermal tolerance is often neglected. This study examined the ability of the trematode Podocotyle atomon to modulate the feeding and stress response of Gammarus locusta towards temperature. To accomplish this, infected and uninfected females and males of Gammarus locusta were exposed to temperatures (2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30 °C) for six days. Shredding (change in food biomass) and defecation rates (as complementary measure to shredding rate) were measured as proxies for feeding activity. Lipid and glycogen concentrations (energy reserves), catalase (oxidative stress indicator), and phenoloxidase (an immunological response in invertebrates) were additionally measured. Gammarid survival was optimal at 10 °C as estimated by the linear model and was unaffected by trematode infection. Both temperature and sex influenced the direction of infection effect on phenoloxidase. Infected females presented lower phenoloxidase activity than uninfected females at 14 and 18 °C, while males remained unaffected by infection. Catalase activity increased at warmer temperatures for infected males and uninfected females. Higher activity of this enzyme at colder temperatures occurred only for infected females. Infection decreased lipid content in gammarids by 14 %. Infected males had significantly less glycogen than uninfected, while infected females showed the opposite trend. The largest infection effects were observed for catalase and phenoloxidase activity. An exacerbation of catalase activity in infected males at warmer temperatures might indicate (in the long-term) unsustainable, overwhelming, and perhaps lethal conditions in a warming sea. A decrease in phenoloxidase activity in infected females at warmer temperatures might indicate a reduction in the potential for fighting opportunistic infections. Results highlight the relevance of parasites and host sex in organismal homeostasis and provide useful insights into the organismal stability of a widespread amphipod in a warming sea.
Article
Microsporidian diversity is vast. There is a renewed drive to understand how microsporidian pathological, genomic, and ecological traits relate to their phylogeny. We comprehensively sample and phylogenetically analyse 125 microsporidian genera for which sequence data are available. Comparing these results with existing phylogenomic analyses, we suggest an updated taxonomic framework to replace the inconsistent clade numbering system, using informal taxonomic names: Glugeida (previously clades 5/3), Nosematida (4a), Enterocytozoonida (4b), Amblyosporida (3/5), Neopereziida (1), and Ovavesiculida (2). Cellular, parasitological, and ecological traits for 281 well-defined species are compared with identify clade-specific patterns across long-branch Microsporidia. We suggest that future taxonomic circumscriptions of Microsporidia should involve additional markers (SSU/ITS/LSU), and that a comprehensive suite of phenotypic and ecological traits help to predict broad microsporidian functional and lineage diversity.