Content uploaded by Lekshmi R S
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Lekshmi R S on Jun 07, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2497
HARDCORE CULTURE AND ERGOPHOBIA OF
EMPLOYEES IN CHEMICAL INDUSTRY
Dr.K.Jawaharrani1, Dr.R.S.Lekshmi2, Dr.J.Srilekha3,
Dr.Vijayakanthan4, Dr. R.Muzhumathi 5, Dr.A.Nirmalraj6
Article History: Received: 18.02.2023 Revised: 07.04.2023 Accepted: 23.05.2023
Abstract
People spend roughly one-third of their full-blown life at work, which makes ergophobia a
prevalent cause of hard core culture and, in turn, affects employee performance. There will
always be tension and problems at work since no company can have everyone's jobs,
expectations, and personalities match perfectly. In the past three decades, there has been a
deeper understanding of the prevalence and detrimental effects of workplace issues, as
evidenced by extended and enhanced research, increasing public awareness initiatives, and
changes in legislation and policy, notably in India. Chemical businesses feel that cost-cutting
measures will save billions of dollars in a highly competitive global business environment,
which might enhance their profit and help them achieve their organisational goals in the current
engineering world.
Key words: hard core culture, ergophobia, Role conflict, Organisational Politics
1,2Professor, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, OMR, Chennai.
3Assistant Professor, Ethiraj College for Women, Chennai.
4Assistant Professor, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai.
5Assistant Professor, Velammal Engineering College, Chennai.
6Professor, Velammal Engineering College, Chennai.
DOI: 10.31838/ecb/2023.12.s2.312
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2498
1. INTRODUCTION
Workplace troubles are a major source of
stress for many because people spend
roughly one-third of their full-blown life at
work. It is difficult to create a workplace
where everyone gets along well and there is
no friction between their positions,
expectations, and personalities. As a result,
certain hard core cultures may result in
unpleasant psychological effects. A higher
incidence of mental health conditions
including depression and anxiety has been
linked to perceived stress at work,
according to research. Employees can
discover that speaking with a qualified
mental health practitioner about their job
stress or difficulties benefits them both
emotionally and professionally.
Employees with assorted personalities,
communication manners, and worldviews
continually interact in the workplace. These
discrepancies are one possible source of
workplace problems that can eventually
base for stress and tension for people
engaged by challenging the organization's
basic values. While it is everyone's right to
be treated fairly and feel comfortable at
work, some employees do encounter
bullying, harassment, or discrimination.
Hard core culture can result in meagre
performance or productivity, loss of
employment, lower happiness or
satisfaction, stress, and a host of other
mental health conditions.
Hard core culture
Recent years have seen an increase in the
number of firms balancing the costs of
managing hard core culture ineffectively
against its advantages. Hard core culture, as
used in human resource management, refers
to problems with the workplace,
organisational politics, employee
behaviour, communication, role conflicts,
employee appointment & termination, and
employee development that have an impact
on an organization's general performance,
stability, and culture. Hard core culture
management, in its broadest sense, refers to
the management of problems that the
human race currently faces in
organisational and societal affairs. Due to
the importance of reducing and managing
human activity in hard core culture, the
current research study must concentrate on
hard core culture's long-term effects on
work performance. Only a small number of
scholars have thoroughly examined all of
the aforementioned hard core cultures. For
this reason, the researcher is concentrating
more on the hard core cultures' key
concerns, which have received less
attention from researchers. Role conflict,
difficulties connected to the work
environment, and organisational politics are
assessed by the hard core culture research
framework employed in the study.
When someone is required to perform two
conflicting responsibilities, role conflicts
result. Role conflicts can arise when a
person is expected to fulfil various tasks
inside the same company or when they are
requested to perform roles for distinct
organisations. A worker is more likely to
experience stress at work if there is more
role conflict. Role conflict in the workplace
is measured using the following variables:
inter-role distance, self-role distance, role
stagnation, role overload, and resource
insufficiency.
The surroundings in which a person works
are referred to as the "work environment."
The actual surroundings of the workplace,
such the temperature of the office, or the
tools used, like computers, may make up
the working environment. It may also be
connected to elements like work processes
or protocols.
Organizational politics refers to casual,
unauthorised, and occasionally secret
actions taken to advance ideas, influence
organisations, consolidate power, or
accomplish other specific goals.
Organizational politics denotes to a wide
range of actions linked to the employment
of influence techniques to advance specific
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2499
or group objectives. Politically minded
people do better than their politically
illiterate counterparts in terms of earning
greater personal authority as well as
handling stress and job expectations,
according to studies. They also have a
bigger influence on organisational results.
Ergophobia
Ergophobia is a special phobia linked to the
workplace and an anxiety condition.
Ergophobia is the term used to indicate a
severe anxiety reaction to thoughts of or
events in the job. The most severe type of
anxiety connected to the workplace is
ergophobia. The following is a definition of
it: Ergophobia is recognized by a typical
phobic anxiety response to the jobs
stimulus. When approaching or thinking
about the job, it manifests as a panic-like
reaction with physiological arousal. The
individual clearly avoids the workplace by
acting in this way. There must be
significant subjective distress and/or
impairment in performing regular job
activities as a result of the symptoms.
Though the origin is not fully known, there
are many different causes of ergophobia.
Ergophobia can result from prior
unpleasant job experiences like bullying or
intimidation, as well as from mental
conditions that may be difficult for people
to conceal given the social and continual
nature of the workplace. Ergophobia
therapy is problematic because one of the
most effective phobia therapies, delayed
habituation that leads to desensitization, is
tough since the workplace cannot be
artificially replicated, thus the patient must
get treatment in a public setting. Based on
this, the corporation may concentrate on the
welfare of its workers and lessen workplace
concerns like role conflict and
organisational politics. Organizations
might emphasis avoiding the strict core
cultural behaviours in order to prevent this
fear.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Every single employee spends close to one-
third of their full-blown life at work.
Ergophobia affects many working-class
people's daily lives (Mucci et al., 2016), and
one-third of this group suffers from
distressing mental illnesses (Wittchen, et
al., 2011). For many workers, the main
source of stress is problems at work. There
is no such thing as a problem-free
workplace where everyone's
responsibilities, ambitions, and traits mesh
together without any conflicts. According
to the ADAA's (Anxiety Disorders
Association of America) report, stress and
anxiety at work may be associated.
According to Muschalla (2009), avoidance
of the workplace and its symptoms might
hinder one's ability to carry out everyday
tasks at work or cause great subjective pain.
Swarnalatha (2013) has documented a
variety of behaviours that disrupt the
atmosphere of workplace tranquilly. The
degree of management, age, characteristics
related to family, detachment from one's
job, and involvement in categorisation are
all impacted negatively by significant
disparities in roles. Work is becoming
increasingly time-constrained, socially and
technologically dependent, and
intellectually challenging. Muschalla and
M. Linden (2016) highlighted that
employees with workplace fear had taken
longer sick leaves than patients without
such phobia. Literature indicates that
workplace design may influence
organisational and employee outcomes,
including improved communication,
collaboration, innovation, and increased
employee engagement, happiness, well-
being, performance, and staff retention.
Beate & Michael (2014) calculated the
overall prevalence of the common
workplace phobia and the relative phobia as
well as its context-related characteristics.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
• To identify the main issues with hard core
culture that affect workers in the chemical
industry.
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2500
• To examine how demographic factors
affect ergophobia and hard core culture.
• To examine how ergophobia is impacted
by hard core culture
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The researcher tried to assess the hard core
culture and its effect on ergophobia in the
chosen chemical enterprises in Chennai in
this study. Due to the abundance of
significant industrial facilities and related
businesses in and around the city, Chennai
has been dubbed the "Detroit of Asia."
Therefore, it appears that this title has a
larger scope for the research in the location
(Chennai) that was chosen to conduct the
study. In addition to offering trade union
recognition, gratuity payments, incentives,
rights to collective bargaining, and
termination or suspension of employees
from work for violating company policies
and codes of behaviour, two of the chemical
companies in Chennai were the subjects of
the research.
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The target audience for this study was the
workers from two chemical companies in
Chennai. It uses a descriptive research
approach. A well-constructed questionnaire
was used to gather information from 408
respondents. In order to analyse the
collected data, SPSS is employed. The data
were analysed using the statistical
techniques of percentage, ANOVA,
Independent t-Test, and Regression
analysis.
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Profile of Sampled Employees from
Chemical Sector
Table 1 Profile of sampled employees from chemical sector
Categories
Attributes
Per cent
Age Group
20-35 Years
54.7
36 - 50 Years
33.6
51 - 60 Years
11.8
Marital Status
Single
26.0
Married
74.0
Educational Qualification
Up to 12th Std.
27.7
ITI/ Diploma
53.4
Undergraduate
18.9
Annual Income
Less than 2 Lakhs
36.0
2 Lakhs - 4 Lakhs
50.5
More than 4 Lakhs
13.5
Work Place
Shop floor
86.0
Admin Office
14.0
Category of Employment
Apprenticeship/ Training
15.7
Temporary /Contract
42.4
Permanent
41.9
Experience in the current
Organization
Less than 5 Years
45.3
6 - 10 years
21.1
11 - 15 years
24.3
More than 15 years
9.3
The following inferences were made from
the Table 1.From the percentage analysis it
found that majority (54.7%) of the sampled
employees belong to the age group of 20-35
years, 33.6% of the employees fall under
the category of 36-50 years of age category
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2501
and only 11.8 % of the sampled employees
are in the age category of 51- 60 years.
It is also figured out that most (74.0%) of
the sampled employees working in the
chosen chemical company are married and
only one-fourth (26.0%) of them are single
in their personal life which includes
bachelors, divorced/ separated, and
widowers.
With respect to their educational
qualification, the result of the analysis show
that 53.4% of them are qualified with
technical education such as ITI/ Diploma,
27.7% of them are completed their
educational qualification only up to 12th and
18.9% of them have completed their
undergraduate in various arts & science,
and engineering courses.
The analysis also narrates about the annual
income earned by the sampled employees
where 50.5% of them earn a yearly income
of 2 to 4 lakhs, around one-third (36.0%) of
the sampled employees earn less than 2
lakhs in a year and only 13.5% of them
found to be drawing an annual income of
more than 4 Lakhs per year.
With regards to the work place of the
employees, it is resulted out that most
(86.0%) of the sampled employees are
working in shop floor and 14.0% of them
work in the administration office.
42.4% of the sampled employees have their
category of employment as temporary or
contract basis, 41.9% of them are found to
be permanent employees with regards to the
type of employment and 15.7% are doing
apprenticeship or undergoing their
educational training at chemical
organizations.
According to the data, 45.3% of the
sampled respondents had fewer than five
years of experience in the present chemical
organisation, and 24.3% have between six
and eleven years of experience. Similarly,
21.1% of the employees have six to ten
years of experience in the current
organization and 9.3% of them are found to
have above fifteen years of experience.
T Test for Marital Status and Workplace
on Hard Core Culture & Ergophobia
H01: No significant mean difference
is found between marital status and
workplace of employees with respect to the
hard core culture and ergophobia in the
chemical organizations.
Ha1: Significant mean difference is
found between marital status and workplace
of employees with respect to the hard core
culture and ergophobia in the chemical
organizations
Table 2 T test for marital status and workplace on hard core culture and ergophobia
Factors of hard core culture
&Ergophobia
Frequency
Mean
SD
T
value
P
value
Result
Hard core
culture
Marital
status
Single
106
64.9
24.217
-
3.601
0
Significant
Married
302
73.65
20.515
Ergophobia
Single
106
25.13
8.823
-3.33
0.001
Significant
Married
302
28.48
8.959
Hard core
culture
Work place
Shop
floor
351
74.28
24.35
3.63
0.004
Significant
Admin
Office
57
66.77
19.096
Ergophobia
Shop
floor
351
27.99
9.299
3.566
0.003
Significant
Admin
Office
57
24.24
9.05
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2502
The above table display the outcome of T
test analysis carried out between marital
status of the employees and Hard core
culture s. From the analysis it is discovered
that the significance value of all the three
types of Hard core culture such as role
conflict, work environment, organizational
politics and overall score of Hard core
culture are found to be less than 0.01,
therefore we reject null hypothesis (H01),
and accept alternate hypothesis (Ha1),
which proves that significant difference
exists between single and married
employees with respect to their opinion
towards all the three types of Hard core
culture s. Therefore the outcome of the
assessment narrates that married employees
feel more Hard core culture while
compared to the single employees with a
total mean score value of 73.65 and
standard deviation is 20.51.
Generally, married employees may face
more problems in their personal life. If they
even problems or issues in Hard core
culture s, they find very difficult to handle
it and exaggerate even some petty issues in
their personal and/or work life, whereas the
employees who are not married have less
burden in their personal life, and they take
it is easy when they face problems in their
work life, and able to resolve the issues and
adopt to the flaws in the system without
having more negative feeling towards their
job and the organization.
The Table also exhibits the outcome of T
test analysis carried out between marital
status and outcome variables of the
research. From the analysis, it is discovered
that the significance value of Ergophobia is
less than 0.01, which discards the null
hypothesis (H02), and confirms the
alternate hypothesis (Ha2). Henceforth, it is
declared that significant difference is found
between single and married employees with
respect to Ergophobia in the chemical
organizations. Moreover the married
employees perceive higher level of
Ergophobia while compared to single
employees with the mean score value of
28.48 and standard deviation is 8.959. The
married employees those who perceive
more issues at their workplace have
exhibited higher level of ergophobia.
The outcome T test analysis carried out
between wok place and Hard core culture is
also shown in Table 2. From the above
results, it is exposed that the significance
value of role conflict, work environment,
organizational politics and overall score of
Hard core culture are below 0.01. Hence
from the T test analysis it is attested that
null hypothesis (H01) is discarded with
regards to all the three types of Hard core
culture and alternate hypothesis (Ha1) is
acknowledged. Furthermore the test also
shows that the employees working in shop
floor and administration office significantly
varies with respect to their views about the
issues at workplace. Therefore it is declared
that the employees working in shop floor
perceive comparatively more role conflict,
and work environment related issues,
whereas the employees working in
administration office perceive more politics
in their workplace. However, overall the
shop floor employees perceive more issues
at their workplace with a total mean score
value of 74.28 and standard deviation is
24.350.
The category of employment, work
environment, educational qualification and
family background of the employees may
significantly vary from the employees those
who are working in shop floor from the
employees working in administration
office, so consequently the kind of Hard
core culture they face in the workplace also
may be different.
From the analysis it is discovered that the
significance value of the outcome variables
Ergophobia is below 0.01 level significant.
Hence from the T test analysis it is attested
that null hypothesis (H01) is not accepted
and alternate hypothesis (Ha1) is accepted,
therefore it is concluded that significant
difference is resulted between employees
working in shop floor and administration
office with respect to ergophobia. The
results further explores that the employees
working in shop floor have exhibited
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2503
comparatively higher level of Ergophobia
with a total mean score value of 27.99 and
standard deviation is 9.299.
Anova on Age Category, designation and
experience vs. Hard core culture &
Ergophobia
H02:Age Category, designation and
experience of the employee is not having
noteworthy impact on their opinion towards
the various Hard core culture and
Ergophobia
Ha2:Age Category, designation and
experience of the employee is having
noteworthy impact on their opinion towards
the various Hard core culture and
Ergophobia
Table 3 ANOVA: Age Category, designation and experience vs. hard core culture and
ergophobia
Factors of hard core culture
Samples
Mean
SD
F
value
P value
Hard core
culture
Age
25 – 35Years
223
65.34 b
26.67
10.973
<0.001
Significant
36 - 50 Years
137
65.54 b
24.26
51 - 60 Years
48
48.31 a
25.08
Ergophobia
25 – 35Years
223
26.73b
10.985
14.112
<0.001
Significant
36 - 50 Years
137
30.41c
9.614
51 - 60 Years
48
21.22a
11.4
Hard core
culture
Designation
Apprentice/Helper
60
68.11b
27.439
10.455
0.001
Significant
Technician
288
72.52b
29.922
Clerk/Accountant/
Admin
33
51.12a
30.197
Others
27
45.11a
28.001
Ergophobia
Apprentice/Helper
60
27.81b
10.406
11.868
0.001
Significant
Technician
288
29.11b
12.845
Clerk/Accountant/
Admin
33
19.24a
13.5
Others
27
15.59a
13.362
Hard core
culture
Experience
Less than 5 Years
185
75.70 b
27.843
12.949
<0.001
Significant
6 - 10 years
86
74.98 b
32.842
11 - 15 years
99
58.24 a
30.114
More than 15
years
38
51.92 a
28.387
Ergophobia
Less than 5 Years
185
27.40b
11.858
6.213
<0.001
Significant
6 - 10 years
86
27.19b
14.125
11 - 15 years
99
22.90a
13.449
More than 15
years
38
19.18a
13.298
*Note: The significance among subgroups of age categories are specified through the
different letters a, b.
The results of one-way ANOVA between
age category of the employees and their perception towards various Hard core
culture in chemical sector are exposed in
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2504
Table 3. Various types of hard core culture
examined under this research are having
significant value less than 0.01, which
confirms alternate hypothesis (Ha2), and
leads to the conclusion of age Category of
the employee is having noteworthy impact
on their opinion towards the various Hard
core culture at selected chemical sectors
from Chennai city.
The researcher adopted Duncan Multiple
Range Test (DMRT) post-hoc test to further
explore the significance difference among
the subgroups, and the existence of
significant difference among the different
subgroups based on age categories are
represented through letters a, and b. The
employees aged 51-60 years significantly
differ from the employees aged up to 50
years (i.e. 25-35 years, and 35-50 years)
with respect to their perception towards role
conflict, and organizational politics,
however there is no significant difference
exists between the employees aged 25-35
years, and 35-50 years with regards to role
conflict, and organizational politics. In case
of the issues related to work environment
the employees aged above 35 years (i.e. 36-
50 years, 51-60 years) significantly differ
from the employees aged 25-35 years.
Overall, the employees aged 51-60 years
perceived least level of Hard core culture in
their chemical organization with the mean
score of 48.31 and SD of 25.081, and the
highest level of Hard core culture are
perceived by the employees aged (65.54),
and followed by 25-35 years (65.34).
The employees aged 25-35 years have
perceived highest level of role conflict in
the workplace, because they are in the entry
level, and they are learning their
organization practices, procedures, work
styles. During this period there may be
mismatch between their individual goals
and organizational goals, and their
expectations and assumption about the
organization and their roles &
responsibilities may become
disappointment in the reality. Similarly, the
employees aged 36-50 years also perceived
more issue on role clarity due to improper
balance between work and family interface,
lack of clarity in their roles &
responsibilities, etc. The employees aged
51-60 years are almost in the end of their
career life, and their focus would me more
on personal life rather than professional
life. These employees should have
accustomed to Hard core culture and also
know how to handle those issues, so they
will not give more importance to these
issues. Ergophobia analyzed under this
research are having significant value less
than 0.01, which confirms alternate
hypothesis (Ha2), and leads to the
conclusion of Age Category of the
employee is having noteworthy impact on
their perception towards the Ergophobia at
selected chemical organizations from
Chennai city.
The researcher adopted Duncan Multiple
Range Test (DMRT) post-hoc test to further
explore the significance difference among
the subgroups, and the existence of
significant difference among the different
subgroups based on age categories are
represented through letters a, and b. The
employees aged 51-60 years significantly
differ from the employees aged up to 50
years (i.e. 25-35 years, and 35-50 years)
with respect to their perception towards
ergophobia; however there is a significant
difference exists between the employees
aged 25-35 years, and 35-50 years with
regards to ergophobia.
The employees aged 51-60 years have
perceived least level of ergophobia, while
compared to the employees aged 36-50
years those who have recorded the highest
level of ergophobia, which is followed by
the employees aged 25-35 years.
The employees aged 36-50 years have lot of
personal commitments, such as children’s
education, younger siblings marriage,
parents health issues, etc., They also are in
the mid of their professional life, so they
want to put their maximum efforts to grow
in their career, but the interference of
personal life in to career, and interference
of work life in to personal life would be
more in this age category, so therefore
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2505
facing more issues at workplace may easily
create Ergophobia in this age category,
whereas the employees aged 25-35 would
more focus on work life to have growth in
their career, whereas 51-60 years would
give priority to personal life rather than to
the career because they are in the end of
their professional life. Therefore, they are
least affected with ergophobia.
Various types of Hard core culture
surveyed under this research are having
significance value less than 0.01, which
confirms alternate hypothesis (Ha2), and
leads to the conclusion of designation of the
employee is having noteworthy impact on
their perception towards the various Hard
core culture at selected chemical sectors
from Chennai city.
The employees working as technicians, and
Apprentice/Helper significantly differ from
the employees designated as Clerk/
Accountant/ Admin, and other categories
(supervisors/ store in-charge, etc.) with
respect to their perception towards role
conflict, work environment and
organizational politics, however there is no
significant difference exists between the
technicians, and Apprentice /Helper.
Overall, the employees working as
technicians perceived highest level of Hard
core culture in the chemical organization
with the mean score of 72.52 and SD of
29.922, and the least level of Hard core
culture are perceived by the other category
employees (45.11), and followed by Clerk/
Accountant/ Admin (51.12), and
Apprentice /Helper (68.11).
Ergophobia are having significance value
less than 0.01, which confirms alternate
hypothesis (Ha10), and leads to the
conclusion of designation of the employees
are having noteworthy impact on their
perception towards the Ergophobia at
selected chemical organizations from
Chennai city. The employees working as
technicians, and Apprentice /Helpers
significantly differ from the employees
working as Clerk/ Accountant/ Admin, and
other category employees with regards to
their perception towards Ergophobia and
job performance, however there is a
significant difference exists between the
employees technicians, and Apprentice
/Helpers, and also between Clerk/
Accountant/ Admin, and other category
employees with regards to ergophobia, and
job performance.
The employees working as technicians have
demonstrated highest level of ergophobia,
while compared to the Apprentice /Helpers,
Clerk/ Accountant/ Admin, and others
category. The employees working as more
occupational stress to meet their work
targets, and they face issues such as lack of
cooperation and team work, poor job fit, job
insecurity, poor work environment,
discrimination by the supervisor/ manager,
etc., which creates Ergophobia in this
category of the employees.
Ergophobia analyzed under this research
are having significance value less than 0.01,
which confirms alternate hypothesis (Ha2),
and leads to the conclusion of designation
of the employees are having noteworthy
impact on their perception towards the
Ergophobia at selected chemical
organizations from Chennai city.
The employees having less than 10 years of
experience (i.e. less than 5 years, and 6-10
years) significantly differ from the
employees having more than 10 years (i.e.
11-15 years, and more than 15 years) of
experience with respect to their perception
towards ergophobia. The employees
having more than 15 years of experience in
the present organization have shown least
level of ergophobia, while compared to the
employees having less than 15 years of
experience (i.e. less than 5 years, 6-10
years, 11-15 years). The employees having
more number of years of experience in the
present organization learns how to handle
the issues at workplace, and/ or getting
adopted to such environment, whereas the
employees who has less experience in the
present organization may struggle to handle
few unique issues at the workplace.
Regression Analysis on Effect of Role
Conflict, Work Environment, and
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2506
Organizational Politics on Hard core
culture
Hard core culture (Y) is the dependent
variable, and Role Conflict (X1), Work
Environment (X2), and Organizational
Politics (X3) act as independent variables.
The multiple R value is 0.811, R square
value is 0.672, adjusted R square is 0.611,
F value is 12.675, and significance value of
the model is <0.001.
The adjusted R –square value is closer to R-
square value, which indicates that all the
independent variables are having
significant effect on dependent variable.
According to Adjusted R-square value
0.611, 61.1% of the variance in Hard core
culture (dependent variable) is explained by
the independent variables (role conflict,
work environment, and organizational
politics).
Table 4 Hard core culture Estimates
Variables
Un standardized.
Estimates
Standardized
Estimates
t value
P value
Constant
3.376
-
10.843
<0.001**
Role Conflict(X1)
0.727
0.454
15.732
<0.001**
Work Environment(X2)
0.694
0.326
11.532
<0.001**
Organizational Politics(X3)
0.783
0.463
18.223
<0.001**
Note:** significant at 1% level.
Table 4 displays that multiple correlation
coefficient is 0.811 which indicates the
degree of relationship among the actual and
predicted values of Hard core culture s. In
this analysis the predicted values are
computed by linear combination of the
variables such as Role Conflict(X1), Work
Environment(X2), and Organizational
Politics(X3) the coefficient value of 0.811
which denotes that the relationship among
Hard core culture and the three independent
variables (i.e. types of Hard core culture s)
are optimistic.
The goodness-of-fit of the regression model
is assessed through R Square value (i.e.
coefficient of determination), which
explains estimated SRP in terms of the
proportion of the variation in the dependent
variables described by the fitted sample
regression equation.
It is exposed form the analysis that the
0.672 is the value of R-square, which
represent 67% of the variation in Hard core
culture is described by the estimated SRP
that uses the Independent Variables such as
role conflict, work environment and
organizational politics.
Equation of Multiple Regression is
presented below:
Y = 3.376 + 0.454X1 +0.326X2 + 0.463X3
The effect of independent variables on
dependent variable specified through the
above mentioned regression equation. From
the above equation, it is interpreted that one
unit of rise in role conflict has 0.454 unit of
rise in Hard core culture s, whereas one unit
of increase in work environment related
issues has 0.324 unit of increase in Hard
core culture s, and one unit of rise in
organizational politics has 0.463 unit of rise
in Hard core culture s, without changing
other independent variables of the research
and all these coefficients are positive and
significant at 1% level.
Among the three different types of issues,
organizational politics has the major impact
on Hard core culture construct. The above
investigation proves that organizational
politics is the prime factor for Hard core
culture in the chosen chemical companies.
Regression Analysis on Effect of Role
Conflict, Work Environment, and
Organizational Politics on Ergophobia
Ergophobia(Y) is the dependent variable,
and Role Conflict (X1), Work Environment
(X2), and Organizational Politics (X3) act
as independent variables. The multiple R
value is 0.681, R square value is 0.522,
adjusted R square 0.516, F value is 46.407,
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2507
and significance value of the model
is<0.001.
In this regression analysis, the adjusted R –
square value is closer to R-square value,
which indicates that all the independent
variables are having significant effect on
dependent variable. According to Adjusted
R-square value 0.516, 51.6% of the
variance in Ergophobia(dependent
variable) is explained by the independent
variables (role conflict, work environment,
and organizational politics).
Table 5 Ergophobia– Regression Estimates
Variables
Unstandardized
Estimates
Standardized
Estimates
t value
P value
Constant
8.573
-
10.314
<0.001**
Role Conflict (X1)
0.327
0.339
4.156
<0.001**
Work Environment (X2)
0.443
0.391
4.674
<0.001**
Organizational Politics(X3)
0.605
0.462
8.647
<0.001**
Note: ** significant at 1% level.
Table 5 displays that multiple correlation
coefficient is 0.681 which indicates the
degree of relationship among the actual and
forecasted values of ergophobia. In this
analysis the forecasted values are computed
by linear combination of the variables such
as Role Conflict (X1), Work
Environment(X2), and Organizational
Politics (X3) the coefficient value of 0.681
which denotes that the relationship among
Ergophobia and the three independent
variables (i.e. types of Hard core culture s)
are optimistic.
It is exposed form the analysis that the
0.522 is the value of R-square, which
represent 52% of the variation in
Ergophobia are described by the estimated
SRP that uses the independent variables
such as role conflict, work environment and
organizational politics.
Equation for Multiple Regression Equation:
Y = 8.573 + 0.339X1 +0.491X2 + 0.662X3
The effect of independent variables on
dependent variable specified through the
above mentioned regression equation. From
the above equation, it is interpreted that one
unit of rise in role conflict has 0.339 unit of
rise in ergophobia, whereas one unit of rise
in work environment related issues has
0.391 unit of increase in ergophobia, and
one unit of rise in organizational politics
has 0.462 unit of rise in ergophobia, without
changing other independent variables of the
research and all these coefficients are
positive and significant at 1% level.
Among the three different types of issues,
organizational politics has the major impact
on ergophobia. The above investigation
proves that organizational politics is the key
factor which has major effect on
Ergophobia in the chemical organizations.
4. CONCLUSION
This study focused on ergophobic issues,
which are costly, have negative effects on
occupational health, and which need more
research. The findings of our study revealed
that ergophobia is both a novel idea and a
significant problem in the workplace.
Absenteeism and organisational expenses
are connected to employee health.
Ergophobia should be recognised by upper-
and middle-level management, especially
when employees often take extended sick
leaves. This study expands on our
knowledge of the value of employees'
psychological well-being at work and
demonstrates how risk factors for disability,
including ergophobia, may be reduced.
5. REFERENCES:
1. American Psychiatric
Association, Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, 5th (DSM-5), American
Section A-Research paper
Hardcore Culture And Ergophobia Of Employees In Chemical Industry
Eur. Chem. Bull. 2023, 12 (S2), 2497 – 2508 2508
Psychiatric Publishing,
Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
2. Anuradha, M & Jawahar Rani, K
2019, ‘Examining the impact of
E-learning on resolving work place
issues in manufacturing industries
at Chennai city’, The Online Journal
of Distance Education and
e-Learning, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 81-88.
3. Beate Muschalla & Michael Linden
2014, ‘Workplace Phobia,
Workplace Problems, and Work
Ability among Primary Care
Patients with Chronic Mental
Disorders’, The Journal of the
American Board of Family
Medicine, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 486–
494.
4. Haines, J, Williams, CL & Carson,
JM, 2002, ‘Workplace Phobia:
Psychological and
Psychophysiological Mechanisms’,
International Journal of Stress
Management, vol. 9, issue 3, pp.
129-145.
5. Linden M. and Muschalla B 2007,
“Anxiety disorders and workplace-
related anxieties,” Journal of
Anxiety Disorders, vol. 21, no. 3,
pp. 467–474.
6. Mucci N., Giorgi G., S. Ceratti. D.
P, Fiz-Pérez J., Mucci F., and
Arcangeli G 2016, “Anxiety, stress-
related factors, and blood pressure
in young adults,” Frontiers in
Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 1–10.
7. Muschalla B 2009, “Workplace
phobia,” German Journal of
Psychiatry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–
53,.
8. Prem Chopra 2009, ‘Mental health
and the workplace: issues for
developing countries’, International
Journal of Mental Health Systems,
vol. 3, issue 4, pp. 1-9.
9. Swarnalatha 2013, ‘Workplace
Harassment and Job Satisfaction:
An Empirical study among
employees of Automotive
Industries in India’, Tactful
Management Research Journal, vol.
1, issue 5, pp. 1-6.
10. Wittchen H. U., Jacobi F., Rehm J.
2010, “The size and burden of
mental disorders and other disorders
of the brain in Europe” European
Neuro psycho pharmacology, vol.
21, no. 9, pp. 655–679, 2011.