ArticlePublisher preview available

The Moral Economy of the Agatu “Massacre”: Reterritorializing Farmer-Herder Relations

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract and Figures

The Agatu “Massacre” is a conflict between pastoralists and farmers in the Agatu area of Benue State, Nigeria. The conflict is significant because of the event’s gravity, but no scholarly inquiry that involves thoughtful and reflective methodological and theoretical approaches has been made. This paper investigates how the farmer-herder relations in Agatu became a violent crisis and situates it within relevant literature to fill gaps in farmer-herder conflicts literature in Africa. Existing literature demonstrates the pertinence of moral economies for resource use, spatial pattern, and manifestations of conflicts in developing and developed worlds. However, studies have yet to use the moral economy concept to explore the African farmer-herder conflicts from a political ecology perspective. This paper demonstrates that the Agatu crisis emerged due to reterritorializations in the moral economy of farmers and herders, disrupting their social ties. It further illustrates that the violence in Agatu was caused by the deviation from the traditional approach to addressing the damage done to crops by herding livestock. Nevertheless, the paper argues that this deviation is the consequence of modifications in the moral economy of farmers and herders driven by the aspiration for financial gain rather than the subsistence of agro-pastoral relations. The paper argues that changes in moral economies can disrupt social relations and lead to farmer-herder conflicts, leading to the exclusion of pastoralists from resource access through policy and legislation.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Society (2023) 60:359–371
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00860-x
(IM)MOBILITIES, SECURITY ANDIDENTITIES INWEST AFRICA BORDERLANDS
The Moral Economy oftheAgatu “Massacre”: Reterritorializing
Farmer‑Herder Relations
CletusFamousNwankwo1,2
Accepted: 16 May 2023 / Published online: 6 June 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023
Abstract
The Agatu “Massacre” is a conflict between pastoralists and farmers in the Agatu area of Benue State, Nigeria. The conflict
is significant because of the event’s gravity, but no scholarly inquiry that involves thoughtful and reflective methodologi-
cal and theoretical approaches has been made. This paper investigates how the farmer-herder relations in Agatu became
a violent crisis and situates it within relevant literature to fill gaps in farmer-herder conflicts literature in Africa. Existing
literature demonstrates the pertinence of moral economies for resource use, spatial pattern, and manifestations of conflicts
in developing and developed worlds. However, studies have yet to use the moral economy concept to explore the African
farmer-herder conflicts from a political ecology perspective. This paper demonstrates that the Agatu crisis emerged due to
reterritorializations in the moral economy of farmers and herders, disrupting their social ties. It further illustrates that the
violence in Agatu was caused by the deviation from the traditional approach to addressing the damage done to crops by herd-
ing livestock. Nevertheless, the paper argues that this deviation is the consequence of modifications in the moral economy
of farmers and herders driven by the aspiration for financial gain rather than the subsistence of agro-pastoral relations. The
paper argues that changes in moral economies can disrupt social relations and lead to farmer-herder conflicts, leading to the
exclusion of pastoralists from resource access through policy and legislation.
Keywords Agatu “Massacre”· Farmer-herder conflict· Moral economy· Political ecology· Reterritorialization
Introduction
The Agatu “Massacre” is a conflict between native Idoma
farmers and the Fulani herders in the Agatu local govern-
ment area (LGA) of Benue State in Nigeria. The crisis began
in 2012, leading to the heaviest battle in 2016, dubbed the
Agatu “Massacre” (Mayah, 2016). The Agatu crisis began in
Akpeko in the Ocholoyan village of Okokolo ward and even-
tually spread throughout the Agatu LGA. The Idoma farmers
claim that the Fulani pastoralists aim to take over Agatu,
especially the riverine villages such as Obagaji, Adagbo,
Akwu, Odugbehon, Aila, Okokolo, and Odejo, due to their
fertile land and freshwater suitable for agro-pastoral produc-
tion (Mayah, 2016). However, the Fulani herders stated that
the Agatu people were wrong and pretended to be victims.
The conflict escalated when an Agatu and Tiv militia group
killed a Fulani herder named Sehu Abdullahi and stole over
200 cattle (Mayah, 2016). Despite the murder, no serious
action was taken by the police or government. The herders
indicated that theconflict intensified when the Agatu mili-
tia beheaded a well-known Fulani leader named Madaki.
Madaki attended a meeting to resolve issues surrounding the
death of Sehu Abdullahi and the damage his cattle inflicted
on crops (Mayah, 2016). His death provoked the Fulani
people, which resulted in a crisis involving killings and the
destruction of property. A report indicates 3920 people died
from the conflict between 2013 and 2017, and 2000 died in
internally displaced person camps (Duru, 2017). Exploring
the nature and dynamics of this conflict can contribute to the
literature on farmer-herder conflicts in Africa.
Although the media reports offer some background infor-
mation about the crisis, serious scholarly research on the
conflict that involves thoughtful and reflective methodo-
logical and theoretical approaches has not been conducted.
The research examines the nature of the Agatu massacre to
understand how the farmer-herder conflict in Agatu became
* Cletus Famous Nwankwo
cfn5@leicester.ac.uk
1 School ofGeography, Geology andtheEnvironment,
University ofLeicester, Leicester, England
2 Department ofGeography, University ofNigeria, Nsukka,
Nigeria
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Rejecting the scarcity explanation, Akov's (2017, p. 288) study in Central Nigeria identified a bunch of issues "including elite land grabbing, ethno-religious identity construction, weak state capabilities, the citizenship question, corrupt traditional institutions, the lack of an effective land tenure system and a widespread culture of impunity". Others focused on "the complex relationships between political interests, moralities, and resource access" (Turner, 2004, p. 863) and how moral transgressions heighten exclusion because of indigenous status (Nwankwo & Okafor, 2021;Nwankwo, 2023). Another set of literature shows how state land use and tenure marginalisation engender farmer-herder conflicts (Nwankwo, 2024d;Nwankwo, 2025;Walwa, 2020). ...
... This study uses a qualitative approach. Qualitative research does not use probability sampling, which is used to determine the sample size for the study given the study area population (Nwankwo, 2023). Interviews were conducted until saturation was reached. ...
... Interviews were conducted until saturation was reached. Saturation is when additional interviews do not review new information about the conflict (Nwankwo, 2023). ...
Article
Conflicts between farmers and pastoralists have had devastating consequences in Nigeria’s Benue Valley. While previous studies have emphasized environmental resource scarcity arising from population growth, environmental degradation, and climate change as the main sources of scarcity engendering conflicts, the social production of scarcity through accumulation by dispossession has received limited attention. This paper fills that gap by investigating the farmer-herder conflicts in the Benue Valley and highlighting how scarcity of critical land is socially produced through capitalist accumulation by dispossession. This scarcity leads to tensions between pastoralists and farmers, underscoring the relevance of accumulation by dispossession in this specific context.
... Eco-violence does pose significant challenges due to the mass murders and destruction associated with it (Nwankwo, 2023;Olumba, 2023), but it also greatly impacts the mobility and immobility patterns of people. Eco-violence between social groups in Nigeria is garnering increased scholarly attention (Nwankwo, 2020;Ogu, 2020;Ojo, 2023;Olumba, 2023); in contrast, most research on the (im)mobility of Nigerians is increasingly focusing on crossborder movements. ...
... Narratives about their ancestral ties to the land and the attempts by "settlers" to claim it have reinforced their resolve to maintain control over their communal land. The Agatu local government area is infamous for the "Agatu Massacres", a term that describes a series of deadly attacks by alleged herder militias over multiple days across several communities, resulting in the death of over 500 people (Jimoh, 2016;Mayah, 2016;Uwazuruike, 2020;Nwankwo, 2023). The "Agatu Massacres" exemplify a recent incident similar to what rural communities in the Middle Belt experienced during the colonial period (Nwankwo, 2023;Olumba, 2023, p. 6). ...
... The Agatu local government area is infamous for the "Agatu Massacres", a term that describes a series of deadly attacks by alleged herder militias over multiple days across several communities, resulting in the death of over 500 people (Jimoh, 2016;Mayah, 2016;Uwazuruike, 2020;Nwankwo, 2023). The "Agatu Massacres" exemplify a recent incident similar to what rural communities in the Middle Belt experienced during the colonial period (Nwankwo, 2023;Olumba, 2023, p. 6). ...
Article
Full-text available
While prevailing research on migration predominantly concentrates on individuals fleeing adversities, this approach results in an underrepresentation of communities that exhibit a desire for immobility even in adversity. Thus, the decision of some community members to resist displacement and stay put in communities exposed to adversity, such as violent conflict—eco-violence, is underexplored; this article addresses this gap. In this article, grounded in the concept of collective memory, a reflexive thematic approach is used to analyze data collected in May 2022 from focus group participants in Benue and Nasarawa states in the North Central region of Nigeria. Among other things, the findings highlight the role of collective and materialized memories in shaping the attachments of community members to their ancestral land and their subsequent voluntary adoption of immobility. This article enriches the literature by presenting a perspective on how people’s memories shape the dynamics that support their quest for immobility within their conflict-affected communities, in this case, in the Nigerian context.
... Eco-violence is the violent conflict between sedentary farmers and nomadic Fulani herders over access to and control of land, water, and other agricultural resources (Olumba et al. 2022). It has left millions displaced, thousands dead, and entire communities destroyed (Nwankwo 2023;Olumba 2024a). These violent conflicts are particularly pronounced in the Middle Belt (Olumba 2024a;Nwankwo 2024;Nwosu et al. 2025), where the sedentary farmers from the Idoma and Tiv ethnic groups, amongst others, assert their indigeneity in these communities (Olumba 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Current migration studies often prioritize Western-centric and individualistic perspectives, focusing on persons fleeing adversity. As a result, the staying behaviours of communities, particularly those who choose immobility in areas affected by violent conflict and other adversities, are often overlooked. In addition, existing theoretical frameworks fail to capture the distinctive migratory processes and experiences of communities committed to remaining on their ancestral lands. This article introduces the resilience–accessibility framework, a novel analytical framework developed by integrating theoretical insights from the aspirations–capabilities framework with qualitative data from focus group discussions involving 106 respondents in conflict-affected communities in the Middle Belt region in Nigeria. While the framework primarily addresses immobility in conflict-affected areas, it also applies to collectives, such as Indigenous communities, facing challenges like climatic stress, natural disasters, environmental degradation, and governance instability. By broadening the scope of (im)mobility categories, this article offers a framework that foregrounds often-excluded experiences of immobility. It provides analytical tools to examine how resilience, resource accessibility, and structural conditions shape collective decisions to stay put, particularly in communities in the Global South. In doing so, it addresses a persistent research opportunity in migration studies, where immobility remains under-theorized, especially in conditions of adversity.
... However, peaceful negotiation (24.0%), enlightenment of farmers and herdsmen (24.0%) and establishment of grazing points (12.0%) were the least methods of conflict resolution used. Findings from this study align with that of Nwankwo (2023) who reported some traditional approaches to farmerherder conflict resolution in Benue State, Nigeria to include the court of law, intervention of traditional institutions, farmer associations and local government authorities. ...
... The study shows how moral transgressions amplify identity constructions exacerbating conflicts and pastoralists' exclusion (Nwankwo & Okafor, 2021. Another study by Nwankwo (2023) in Nigeria, applying the moral economy concept within a political ecology framework, argues that changes in the moral economy of farmers and herders marred their relationships, escalating the conflict to violence. Shifts in customary approaches to handling crop destruction and pursuing profit-seeking instead of subsistence relations defined their changes in the moral economy, resulting in violence and exclusion. ...
Article
Climate change impacts various social systems and has been linked to conflicts, especially resource conflicts in dry and semi-dry lands of West Africa. Climate change exacerbates conflicts by influencing the migration of pastoralists towards southern West Africa. Thus, resolving farmer-herder conflicts can be placed in the context of addressing climate change impacts. The political imbroglio in negotiating the climate change regime has impacted communities exposed to climate change. The difficulty of reaching a global binding regime that addresses climate change ethically because of power struggles among states defines climate change geopolitics. Climate change geopolitics thus remains a challenge to addressing farmer-herder conflicts and sustainable development goals 15 and 16 concerning sustainable use of land and promoting peace, respectively. This article argues that the geopolitical ecology framework can help analyse the link between climate change geopolitics and farmer-herder conflicts that addresses the limitation of the eco-violence thesis. Building on the emerging literature on conservation geopolitics dubbed ‘geopolitical ecology’, it demonstrates how integrating the critical geopolitics perspective that has received little attention in the farmer-herder conflicts literature with the blossoming ‘access to resource’ framework of political ecology helps to achieve this.
Article
Studies on farmer-herder conflicts using the Critical Discourse Approach often focus on media portrayals of the conflict. However, the interplay between discursive constructions by primordial or ethnic associations, their dissemination through the media, and their potential effects on the conflict remain underexplored. Therefore, this paper examines the potential effects of the primordially driven discourses on farmer-herder crises in Nigeria. Discourses from civil society on farmer-herder violence in Nigeria hold the potential for two key outcomes: the escalation of the conflict and the creation of doubts about the state’s capacity and impartiality in addressing the violence, leading to calls for restructuring the security architecture to include non-formal security options. Employing Critical Discourse Analysis, the paper examines statements from major ethnic associations across 30 Nigerian online news articles, assessing their role in shaping public perceptions of violence and influencing civil society advocacy for alternative security mechanisms. This paper demonstrates how these narratives can intensify tensions, undermine trust in state security institutions, and, in addition, enable the prioritisation of ethnic biases over constructive dialogue, posing challenges to resolving these violent conflicts. The findings highlight the importance of fostering inclusive and neutral discourse to promote civility and mitigate the worsening of farmer-herder violence.
Article
Full-text available
This paper advocates for an integrated approach to exploring and analysing contemporary conflicts, especially in complex socio-political and cultural contexts. It examines how a framework that incorporates cognitive, socio-political and historical factors can enhance our understanding of these conflicts. Grounded in the ‘cognitive turn’, an idea that advocates combining cognitive and social sciences insights to understand human experiences and actions, this paper draws on secondary sources to demonstrate how neglecting emotion-laden factors and local contextual realities has undermined conflict analysis. Using as case studies the US intervention in Afghanistan and the French missions in the Sahel region it argues that emotional blind spots led them to overlook critical local factors while focusing narrowly on the rational aspects of the conflicts. The paper promotes the development and adoption of cross-disciplinary theoretical models that integrate cognitive influences, environmental conditions and politico-historical contexts to improve conflict analysis and intervention outcomes.
Article
Studies on farmer-herder conflicts in Africa have concentrated on how scarcity of resources, marginalization, ethno-religious and political factors and institutional and governance failures have engendered the conflicts. Little attention is paid to how perceptions of injustices contribute to the escalation of conflict and violence. Thus, this paper examines the escalation of farmer-herder conflict and violence in the Benue-Nasarawa borderland in Nigeria from the perspective of natural resource scarcity and perceptions of injustices. The study uses interviews and field observations for data collection. It uses a political ecology approach to clarify the material interests underlying the conflict stemming from grievances regarding crop damage and cattle killings. The political ecology approach helps to analyze how the acquisition and privatization of wetlands by agro-industrial projects increased the resource competition between pastoralists and farmers, resulting in more crop damage by herders’ cattle and cattle theft/killings by farmers. Then, it uses relative deprivation theory and social injustice perspectives to explore how the perception of injustices about managing the disagreement concerning crop damage by herders’ cattle and cattle theft/killings by farmers following increased resource competition escalate the conflict. It argues that state intervention, notably the anti-open grazing law, amplifies the perceptions of procedural and restorative injustice, prompting violent responses from pastoralists and counter-attacks from farmers. Contrary to the political ecology perspective that often attributes the conflict to state policies marginalizing pastoralists, I argue that material interests are at the heart of the conflict, with perception injustices escalating it into violence. The paper suggests that the analysis of the conflicts can be improved by incorporating political ecology, social justice and relative deprivation perspectives, which arguably improves the understanding of how resource scarcity leads to conflict intensification and escalation of violence.
Article
Full-text available
With increasingly fragmented rangelands, restricted mobility and climatic stress, diversification has accelerated among East African pastoralists. Diversification is also promoted as a climate change adaptation strategy to reduce climatic exposure. Through a study of a Maasai communal land in southern Kenya, we analyze how pastoralists navigate changing access to key productive resources that are linked to diversification processes, social differentiation, and the reshaping of livelihood practices. By integrating an intersectional approach in access theory, we unpack a deeper level of context specific patterns of inclusion and exclusion embedded within evolving production relations.
Article
Full-text available
In Namibia, the institutional framework for governing rural water infrastructure has changed profoundly over the last decades. Following a community-based water management (CBWM) strategy, post-independence policies transferred the responsibility for providing water from the state to local user groups. This turned water from a public good into a common good, and today all pastoral communities must collectively cover the costs of water. In this article, we explore the economic consequences of these developments in the Kunene region of northwestern Namibia. Our analysis reveals that CBWM places a significant burden on all households but that, at the same time, the effects differ across the region. In the northern part of the research area the poor pay a high share, while in the south they find ways to resist. Our analysis reveals that 'moral economic practices' such as food sharing can account for those differences to a significant degree. Communities in the north are characterised by very strong reciprocal patron-client networks, which give the poor relatively little power to oppose pricing rules that are preferred by their wealthy neighbours. In the southern part of the Kunene region, by contrast, social networks are based on sharing norms and are much more egalitarian. Along with other factors, those differences help to explain why the poor in the north find it much more difficult to resist their wealthy neighbours than do the poor in the south. In the end, the actual price of water differs across the region as it intersects with different moral economic practices.
Article
Full-text available
Desertification-induced conflict involving pastoralists and farmers is primarily driven by competition for water, forage, and land, other factors like ethnicity and religion also come into play. This paper utilizes descriptive analysis and secondary data, adopting the Economic & Migration Theory to explain the issue in the southern frontiers. Findings from the paper show that in the southward frontiers, the conflict has taken a different dimension due to differences in culture and religion. The migration from the core north which has been ravaged by desertification to the south has increased confrontation between these groups.
Article
Full-text available
The farmer-pastoralist conflict (FPC) has been discussed and given ethnic and religious appellations in some countries of West Africa, such as Ghana and Nigeria. In Nigeria, such a reading of the conflict is rampant in the media and dominant in national political discourse. However, these ethno-religious insinuations have not received serious scholarly treatment in Nigeria or been downplayed. In this paper, I examine the context in which ethnicity becomes vital to the FPCs, based on fieldwork in the Nimbo-Adani area of Uzo-Uwani municipal council of Enugu State affected most by the conflict in SouthEastern Nigeria. This area is an essential hot spot of the FPCs that has not been explored in analyzing the FPCs in Nigeria. The study is based on field observations and semi-structured in-depth interviews. The paper draws on the FPCs literature regarding the influence of ethnic identities on the conflict. It shows that the difference in ethnicity between pastoralists and farming communities is not the primary root of the conflict. At the first outbreak of violence, the difference in ethnicity was not the cause of the conflict. Ethnic identity only gets cited after the first brutal fighting between the nomads and the farming community. Non-violent conflicts often occur because of cattle destruction of farm crops and pollution of water sources. Although the herders are accused of various atrocities, such as rape and kidnapping, the first outbreak of violence was caused by retaliation for killing a herder in one of the villages. Heightening ethnic identity amplifies the construction of the herders' identity and social status as non-indigenous and non-belonging in the villages. Thus, the villages seek the eviction of the herders based on their social status as non-indigenes. The paper argues that ethnic faultlines matter to the FPCs but only after other factors have initiated the conflict. Therefore, we should pay attention to the primary root of conflicts and how they get the basis for social exclusion activated.
Article
Full-text available
Climate change has remained a major problem around which global development policies are framed. The effects of climate change are rising tremendously and are more evident in Africa with low adaptive capacity to the impacts of climate change and where climate change has led to drought and desertification with consequences for safety and security in the region. Although the connection between climate change and conflicts is well studied, there is little research on the geopolitical contribution of climate change to conflicts. Using a dominant qualitative approach based on secondary data and eco-violence theory, this study examines how geopolitics affects climate change-induced conflicts and displacement in West Africa. Drawing largely from Nigeria and Mali, the study argues that, despite the destructive effects of anthropogenic activities created by insufficient competing areas for livelihood and subsistence resources, the implementation of climate resolution among countries and regions of the world has remained obscure. The repercussions of the geopolitics of climate change are the insurgencies and cattle herders’ unrest in Africa, especially the West African region.
Article
Full-text available
Existing studies of the farmer-herder conflicts (FHCs) in Nigeria have not explored the political ecology of the conflict in South-Eastern Nigeria (SEN). Using the political ecology framework (PEF), the paper examines the nature of the FHCs in Nimbo and Awgu areas in SEN. Data were collected through field observations and in-depth interviews. The paper shows that resource scarcity or reduced farming and grazing spaces did not engender violent FHCs in the study area. Instead, actions of the actors that are perceived to be morally wrong are critical. Allegations of moral transgression such as rape, kidnapping by herders and claims that a herder was used as a sacrifice by villagers triggered the violent episode. The pastoralists are discriminated against on the ground of indigenous belonging only after being alleged to have morally transgressed by kidnapping and raping women. However, on the ground that a herder was allegedly used as a sacrifice, they felt also wronged. While the herders are discriminated against based on their non-belonging in the community because they are not indigenous, they have mount resistance by emphasising their citizenship rights and using force to maintain access to grazing spaces, thereby amplifying the farmer-herder tensions. Thus, while identity has contributed to the FHCs violence, moral wrongs enacted and amplified it. The paper contributes to the literature by arguing that while what triggers FHCs may be moral wrongs, moral transgressions can heighten identity constructions that get implicated in practices of exclusion.
Article
Full-text available
Natural resource conflicts in Mali in the last decade represent an important case to visualise the interconnection between land and climate issues. The country has received significant international attention in recent years both due to the announcement of large-scale land deals and due to its perceived vulnerability to climate stress. At the same time, Malian peasant movements have formed important networks of resistance and have been leading the pilot implementation of village land commissions to recognise and manage community resources, based on a new Agricultural Land Law. This paper explores emerging trends in natural resource politics through the lens of interactions between land and climate policies and discourses. We analyse the growing use of the frame of ‘climate security’ to associate climate change, conflict and migration in relation to countries such as Mali, by looking into the possibilities that this frame could shift focus and blame towards conflicts between marginalised groups and further close space for bottom-up participation. As an alternative, we explore the relevance of a platform of agrarian climate justice and the possibilities and challenges of enacting some of its principles through the implementation of the village land commissions.
Article
Full-text available
Violent clashes between Fulani and Dogon have recently escalated in the Seeno plains in central Mali. After failing to defeat a “jihadist” insurgency dominated by Fulani, the Malian army has sponsored and trained a Dogon militia, which has systematically attacked Fulani villages, and again caused counterattacks. In addition, internal conflicts within Fulani and Dogon society have emerged. This demonstrates the complexities of the current crisis in Mali and how simplistic narratives about its causes are unhelpful. It also shows how views of the enemy as “terrorists” or “jihadists” are dangerous and able to further fuel violent conflicts.
Article
Nicaraguan campesinos partially resist the commoditisation of labour through different ways of valuing, pricing and prioritising their work. Resistance is enabled by everyday practices, moral ideologies and social norms regarding labour exchange. Moral norms simultaneously enable safety nets for emergencies and the destitute, and allow people to participate in capitalist labour markets with a degree of autonomy. However, these moral economies disguise class and gender conflicts. This article breaks down the idea that market exchanges are only profit-seeking and gift-giving is solely the product of mutuality: labour exchanges are a contested battlefield, where exploiters can portray themselves as helpers.