ArticlePublisher preview available

A Distress-Processing Model for Clients in Suicidal Crisis

Hogrefe Publishing
Crisis: the Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Background: While crisis intervention frameworks have indicated the importance of clients in suicidal crisis better understanding their distress to decrease suicidality, it is unclear how clients in suicidal crisis process their distress. Aims: To develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a sequential distress-processing model for clients in suicidal crisis. Methods: Applying task analysis, Study 1 consisted of three phases, which resulted in a theoretically and empirically informed model. In Study 2, we examined the distress-processing model’s validity using a longitudinal design. In both studies, data were online crisis chats with adults in suicidal crisis. Results: In Study 1, we developed a sequential five-stage distress-processing model: (Stage 1) unengaged with distress, (Stage 2) distress awareness, (Stage 3) distress clarity, (Stage 4) distress insight, and (Stage 5) applying distress insight. In Study 2, the model’s validity was supported via evidence that (H1) progression through the processing stages was sequential and (H2) clients with good outcomes had greater progression in their processing than clients with poor outcomes. Limitation: Clients who were suicidal but did not disclose their suicidality were not included. Conclusion: Our findings provide a framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing how clients move through suicidal crises, which can facilitate intervention and research developments.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Research Trends
A Distress-Processing Model for
Clients in Suicidal Crisis
Development and Initial Validation
Johanna M. Mickelson
1
, Daniel W. Cox
1
, Richard A. Young
1
, and David Kealy
2
1
Counselling Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Abstract: Background: While crisis intervention frameworks have indicated the importance of clients in suicidal crisis better understanding their
distress to decrease suicidality, it is unclear how clients in suicidal crisis process their distress. Aims: To develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a
sequential distress-processing model for clients in suicidal crisis. Methods: Applying task analysis, Study 1 consisted of three phases, which
resulted in a theoretically and empirically informed model. In Study 2, we examined the distress-processing models validity using a longitudinal
design. In both studies, data were online crisis chats with adults in suicidal crisis. Results: In Study 1, we developed a sequential five-stage
distress-processing model: (Stage 1) unengaged with distress, (Stage 2) distress awareness, (Stage 3) distress clarity, (Stage 4) distress insight,
and (Stage 5) applying distress insight. In Study 2, the models validity was supported via evidence that (H1) progression through the processing
stages was sequential and (H2) clients with good outcomes had greater progression in their processing than clients with poor outcomes.
Limitation: Clients who were suicidal but did not disclose their suicidality were not included. Conclusion: Our findings provide a framework for
conceptualizing and operationalizing how clients move through suicidal crises, which can facilitate intervention and research developments.
Keywords: client change, crisis intervention, suicidal crisis
Crisis counselors apply crisis theory to help clients in
suicidal crisis move from a crisis state back to their
baseline. Within crisis theory, crisis occurs when peoples
perceptions of experiences create psychological distress
and the distress exceeds their ability to cope (Yeager &
Roberts, 2015). As those in crisis increasingly understand
their distress, distress decreases and they are more able to
adaptively cope (Mishara et al., 2007).
While crisis theorists have indicated the importance of
clients better understanding their experience to reduce
their psychological distress (e.g., Roberts & Ottens, 2005),
how clients make sense of their distress is unclear.
Therefore, the aim of our two studies was to develop a
model of how clients in suicidal crisis process their dis-
tress. By understanding the distress-processing stages,
suicide intervention practices can be tailored to address
clientsstage-specific needs.
Crisis Theory
Within crisis theory, suicidal crises occur when an expe-
rience is perceived as intolerable and inescapable
(Granello, 2010; Yeager & Roberts, 2015). When in crisis
states, people often feel overwhelmed by their emotions,
are unable to cope, and see suicide as an escape (Granello,
2010; Yeager & Roberts, 2015). As clients better under-
stand their distress, their agency and hopefulness increase
and their distress decreases. Once clients are less dis-
tressed, they are more able to adaptively cope and reduce
their suicidality (Granello, 2010; Roberts & Ottens, 2005).
Several studies have found that crisis theory-based in-
terventions have been linked with distress reductions
among those in crisis (Gould et al., 2007; Mishara et al.,
2007). In the following section, we consider relevant
distress-processing theory as a framework for this client-
change process.
Distress Processing
Within distress-processing theories, psychological distress
occurs when the perception of an experience conflicts with
existing beliefs (Stiles, 2001). Processing is making sense
of distress by bringing the perceptions of experiences in-
line with existing beliefs. Processing occurs via (a) ad-
justing perceptions of experiences to be consistent with
existing beliefs or (b) altering beliefs to be consistent with
perceptions of experiences. As the conflict between per-
ceptions of experiences and beliefs abate, so does distress.
Crisis (2024), 45(1), 1825
https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000907
© 2023 Hogrefe Publishing
... Suicide crisis is used to describe the psychological state preceding a suicide behavior, characterized by cognitive and affective dysregulation. It occurs when individuals experience intolerable emotions and they think only to be able to escape through one's death [19][20][21]. Acute behavioral, emotional, and cognitive changes characterizing the "suicide crisis" could develop during days, hours, and minutes before a suicide behavior, and suicide can occur suddenly in the suicidal process [22,23]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background A suicide crisis represents a psychological state preceding a suicide behavior and occurs when an individual experiences intolerable emotions. Only a few instruments have been developed so far to assess cognitions and emotions associated with a specific interpretative model of the suicide crisis. Objectives We aimed to (1) evaluate the psychometric properties of a new questionnaire (Suicidal Crisis Evaluation Scale, SCES) that could potentially assess cognitions and emotions relevant to the suicide crisis; (2) evaluate whether cognitions and emotions investigated with the SCES were characteristics of psychiatric patients at greater risk for suicide; (3) investigate whether the presence and severity of suicide-relevant cognitions and mental states could be associated with affective temperaments; and (3) study whether the severity of current depression at least partially mediated the association between affective temperaments and negative mental states. Methods We included 188 adult psychiatric inpatients admitted to the Sant’Andrea Hospital psychiatric inpatient unit in Rome. We administered the SCES and questionnaires to measure current depression, and affective temperaments. Results A common factor explained around 70% of SCES variance, and SCES scores were significantly higher in patients with a recent suicide attempt than in other patients. Part of the variance in common between some affective temperaments and SCES scores was explained by the presence and severity of current depressive symptoms. Conclusion Psychiatric patients need to be assessed for the presence and severity of cognitions and emotions present during the suicide crisis for a better understanding of the complex architecture of suicide risk. The SCES is a valid and reliable measure that could capture such mental states. More studies are necessary to confirm and expand our results in independent samples.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Crisis counselors’ active listening and collaborative problem-solving helping styles have been associated with outcomes for clients in suicidal crises. These associations have been based on static conceptualizations of helping (i.e., helping style for the entire session). Our aim was to further understand how the crisis counseling helping process unfolds (i.e., helping trajectory) and helping trajectories’ association with clients’ outcomes. Methods Online crisis chats (N = 269) with suicidal adults were coded for crisis counselors’ helping styles (i.e., active listening and collaborative problem-solving) and clients’ outcomes (i.e., resolved or unresolved). Each talk-turn was coded for helping style, which were used to examine helping-style trajectories. Results Growth-curve models indicated that helping styles varied over the course of chats and that helping trajectories were different for resolved and unresolved chats. In resolved chats, helping styles moved from primarily active listening to primarily problem-solving—with a deceleration in the middle of chats. In unresolved chats, helping initially moved from primarily active listening to primarily problem-solving, but this trajectory decelerated in the middle of chats and then turned back toward primarily active listening. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that how the helping process unfolds is related to clients’ outcomes. Implications for practice and research are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Background This paper describes a program of work designed to inform a service model to address a challenge for telephone helplines, namely frequent callers. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review and four empirical studies that drew on different data sources—(a) routinely collected calls data from Lifeline, Australia’s largest telephone helpline; (b) data from surveys/interviews with Lifeline frequent callers; (c) data from the Diagnosis, Management and Outcomes of Depression in Primary Care (diamond) study; and (d) data from Australia’s National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Results Frequent callers represent 3 % of callers but make 60 % of calls. They are isolated and have few social supports but are not “time wasters”; they have major mental and physical health problems and are often in crisis. They make use of other services for their mental health problems. The circumstances under which they use telephone helplines vary, but current service models reinforce their calling behaviour. Conclusions The findings point to a service model that might better serve the needs of both frequent callers and other callers. The model involves offering frequent callers an integrated, tailored service in which they are allocated a dedicated and specially trained telephone crisis supporter (TCS), and given set calling times. It also involves promoting better linkages between telephone helplines and other services that provide mental health care, particularly general practitioners (GPs) and other primary care providers. The next step is to refine and test the model.
Article
Full-text available
Suicide risk assessment includes estimating the likelihood of suicide in words such as ‘low, medium or high’. A ‘high suicide risk’ rating can trigger a powerful urge to eliminate risk immediately. But it is far from clear what ‘high suicide risk’ actually means. In the current state of knowledge, suicide reduction measures should apply to all psychiatric patients, irrespective of an individual patient's perceived risk. For patients presenting with suicidal thoughts, feelings and behaviour, assessment and management should focus on reducing or tolerating emotional pain. Declaration of interest D.M. has received payments from Janssen-Cilag and Servier. Copyright and usage © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) licence.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Research on the assimilation model has suggested that psychological change takes place in a sequence of stages punctuated by setbacks, that is, by transient reversals in the developmental course. This study analyzed such setbacks in one good outcome case and one poor outcome case of Emotion-focused therapy (EFT) for depression. Method: Intensive analyses of five transcribed sessions from each case identified 26 setbacks in the good outcome case and 27 in the poor outcome case. The reason for each setback was classified into one of four categories: balance strategy, exceeding the therapeutic zone of proximal development either induced by the therapist (ZPD-T) or induced by the client (ZPD-C), or spontaneous switches. Results: In the good outcome case the most frequent reasons for setbacks were balance strategy and spontaneous switches, whereas in the poor outcome case the most frequent reason for setbacks was ZPD-T. Conclusions: As in previously studied therapies, setbacks in EFT, usually represent productive work on relatively less advanced strands of the client's major problems. Results point to the importance of the therapist attending to the limits of the client's therapeutic ZPD.
Article
Background: The clinical care of psychiatric patients is often guided by perceptions of suicide risk. The aim of this study was to examine the methods and results of studies reporting high-risk models for inpatient suicide. Methods: We conducted a registered meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched for relevant peer-reviewed cohort and controlled studies indexed in Medline, EMBASE and PsychINFO. Results: The pooled odds ratio (OR) among 18 studies reporting high-risk models for inpatient suicide was 7.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2-12.2]. Between-study heterogeneity in ORs was very high (range 0-94.8, first quartile 3.4, median 8.8, third quartile 26.1, prediction interval 0.80-63.1, I 2 = 88.1%). The meta-analytically derived sensitivity was 53.1% (95% CI 38.2-67.5%, I 2 = 95.9%) and specificity was 84.2% (95% CI 71.6-91.9%, I 2 = 99.9%) with an associated meta-analytic area under the curve of 0.83. The positive predictive value of risk categorization among six cohort studies was 0.43% (95% CI 0.014-1.3%, I 2 = 95.9%). A history of suicidal behavior and depressive symptoms or affective disorder was included in the majority of high-risk models. Conclusions: Despite the strength of the pooled association between high-risk categorization and suicide, the very high degree of observed heterogeneity indicates uncertainty about our ability to meaningfully distinguish inpatients according to suicide risk. The limited sensitivity and low positive predictive value of risk categorization suggest that suicide risk models are not a suitable basis for clinical decisions in inpatient settings.
Article
Objective: The Assimilation model argues that therapists should work responsively within the client's therapeutic zone of proximal development (TZPD). This study analyzed the association between the collaborative processes assessed by the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System (TCCS) and advances in assimilation, as assessed by the Assimilation of Problematic Experiences Scale (APES). Method: Sessions 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 of two contrasting cases, Julia and Afonso (pseudonyms), drawn from a clinical trial of 16-sessions emotion-focused therapy (EFT) for depression, were coded according to the APES and the TCCS. Julia met criteria for reliable and clinically significant improvement, whereas Afonso did not. Results: As expected, Julia advanced farther along the APES than did Afonso. Both therapists worked mainly within their client's TZPD. However, Julia's therapist used a balance of supporting and challenging interventions, whereas Afonso's therapist used mainly supporting interventions. Setbacks were common in both cases. Conclusions: This study supports the theoretical expectation that EFT therapists work mainly within their client's TZPD. Therapeutic exchanges involving challenging interventions may foster client change if they occur in an overall climate of safety.
Article
Objective: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is a widely used reliability index in test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliability analyses. This article introduces the basic concept of ICC in the content of reliability analysis. Discussion for researchers: There are 10 forms of ICCs. Because each form involves distinct assumptions in their calculation and will lead to different interpretations, researchers should explicitly specify the ICC form they used in their calculation. A thorough review of the research design is needed in selecting the appropriate form of ICC to evaluate reliability. The best practice of reporting ICC should include software information, "model," "type," and "definition" selections. Discussion for readers: When coming across an article that includes ICC, readers should first check whether information about the ICC form has been reported and if an appropriate ICC form was used. Based on the 95% confident interval of the ICC estimate, values less than 0.5, between 0.5 and 0.75, between 0.75 and 0.9, and greater than 0.90 are indicative of poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability, respectively. Conclusion: This article provides a practical guideline for clinical researchers to choose the correct form of ICC and suggests the best practice of reporting ICC parameters in scientific publications. This article also gives readers an appreciation for what to look for when coming across ICC while reading an article.