Birds from four little-known protected areas in the state of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil

Abstract

An increasing number of ornithological studies has been carried out in recent decades in Integral Protected Areas (IPA) in the state of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil, mostly concentrated within Eastern native habitats. However, in inland São Paulo, IPA are smaller, surrounded by fragmented landscapes and poorly covered by recent ornithological studies. We aimed to carry out rapid ornithological inventories in four IPA in inland São Paulo to characterize their avifauna and to make these IPA better-known, encouraging future scientific research. We visited IPA in the municipalities of Andradina, Marília, Paulo de Faria and São Simão. We used 10-species lists conducted during 1-3 days in each location, from September 2021 to January 2022. Overall, we recorded 278 species, of which five are endemic to the Cerrado, one to the Atlantic Forest, and five are threatened in the State. Past records from the same areas and adjacent regions indicate a total species richness of 358 species, with five of those being endemic to the Cerrado, nine to the Atlantic Forest, and 26 threatened in São Paulo. Such results demonstrate the importance of these IPA for maintaining bird species in natural environments of inland regions. They also suggest that the detection of species of conservation interests require a greater effort, or that such individuals may have been undetected in these locations. Our database can be used for future comparisons of the regional avifauna.

Full text

Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
http://doi.org/10.24278/2178-5031.202335104
ISSN impresso 0103-2674/on-line 2178-5031
______
1Recebido para análise em 06.09.2022. Aceito para publicação em 28.04.2023. Publicado em 22.05.2023.
2 Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Professor Doutor Antonio Celso Wagner Zanin, 250, 18618-689, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.
3Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Avenida BPS, 1303, 37500-903, Itajubá, MG, Brasil.
4 Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos - CBRO, Av. Eugênio Bartolomai, 386, 04785-040, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
5Autor para correspondência: Vagner Cavarzere - vagner.cavarzere@unesp.br
BIRDS FROM FOUR LITTLE-KNOWN PROTECTED AREAS IN THE STATE OF SÃO PAULO,
SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL1
AVES DE QUATRO UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO POUCO CONHECIDAS DO ESTADO DE
SÃO PAULO, SUDESTE DO BRASIL1
Vagner CAVARZERE 2, 5; Thiago Vernaschi Vieira da COSTA 3; Fabio SCHUNCK4
ABSTRACT - An increasing number of ornithological studies has been carried out in recent
decades in Integral Protected Areas (IPA) in the state of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil, mostly
concentrated within Eastern native habitats. However, in inland São Paulo, IPA are smaller,
surrounded by fragmented landscapes and poorly covered by recent ornithological studies. We
aimed to carry out rapid ornithological inventories in four IPA in inland São Paulo to
characterize their avifauna and to make these IPA better-known, encouraging future scientific
research. We visited IPA in the municipalities of Andradina, Marília, Paulo de Faria and São
Simão. We used 10-species lists conducted during 1 - 3 days in each location, from September
2021 to January 2022. Overall, we recorded 278 species, of which five are endemic to the
Cerrado, one to the Atlantic Forest, and five are threatened in the State. Past records from the
same areas and adjacent regions indicate a total species richness of 358 species, with five of
those being endemic to the Cerrado, nine to the Atlantic Forest, and 26 threatened in São
Paulo. Such results demonstrate the importance of these IPA for maintaining bird species in
natural environments of inland regions. They also suggest that the detection of species of
conservation interests require a greater effort, or that such individuals may have been
undetected in these locations. Our database can be used for future comparisons of the regional
avifauna.
Keywords: Biological reserve; Ecological station; Protected habitats; Santa Maria.
RESUMO – Um número crescente de estudos ornitológicos tem sido desenvolvido nas últimas
décadas em Unidades de Proteção Integral (UPI) do estado de São Paulo, mas estão
concentrados em ambientes nativos da região leste. As UPI do interior paulista, no entanto, são
menores, cercadas por paisagem fragmentada e pouco contempladas de forma abrangente por
estudos ornitológicos recentes. Deste modo, nosso objetivo foi realizar inventários
ornitológicos rápidos em quatro UPI do interior do estado de São Paulo para caracterizar suas
avifaunas e divulgar estas importantes áreas protegidas, incentivando futuras pesquisas
científicas. Foram visitadas UPI localizadas nos municípios de Andradina, Marília, Paulo de
Faria e São Simão, e utilizadas listas de 10 espécies, conduzidas durante até três dias em cada
localidade, entre setembro de 2021 e janeiro de 2022. Foram registradas 278 espécies no total,
sendo cinco endêmicas do Cerrado, uma da Mata Atlântica e cinco ameaçadas de extinção no
estado. Registros pretéritos das mesmas áreas e regiões adjacentes indicaram riqueza total de
358 espécies, sendo as mesmas cinco endêmicas do Cerrado, nove da Mata Atlântica e 26
ameaçadas de extinção em São Paulo. Tais resultados demonstram a importância destas UPI
para a manutenção da riqueza de aves dos ambientes naturais do interior paulista. No entanto,
também sugerem que as detecções de espécies de interesse conservacionista podem demandar
maior esforço amostral, ou mesmo que tais espécies possuem populações de difícil detecção
nestes locais. A base de dados do presente estudo poderá ser utilizada em futuras comparações
sobre as avifaunas destas regiões.
Palavras-chave: Áreas protegidas; Estação Ecológica; Reserva Biológica; Santa Maria.

46
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
1 INTRODUCTION
The state of São Paulo has ornithological
records dating from the 1500s onwards, with the
arrival of European explorers, but the greatest
production of technical data on its avifauna began
in 1808, with the participation of foreign
naturalists (Pelzeln, 1868; Pinto, 1979; Willis and
Oniki, 2003). Between the end of the 19th and the
beginning of the 20th century, naturalists from
Museu Paulista (currently Museu de Zoologia da
Universidade de São Paulo) and collaborators from
different regions, such as H. Pinder, R Krone, O.
Dreher, A. Hempel, J. L. Lima (father and son), E.
Garbe, E. Dente, A. Olalla, H. F. A. Camargo and
O. M. O. Pinto, among others, began ornithological
explorations (Pinto, 1945, 1979; Camargo, 1998;
Grola, 2012). In recent decades, the production of
ornithological knowledge in São Paulo has been
expanded by ornithologists from universities,
research institutes, as well as by the popularization
of birdwatching, via online platforms, generating
historical and current knowledge of 803 bird
species in São Paulo (Willis and Oniki, 2003;
Silveira and Uezu, 2011).
Naturalists and researchers covered much of
São Paulo’s territory during the early 1900s, but
the rapid degradation of inland natural
environments by human colonization and coffee
monoculture directly and negatively reflected the
current number and size of the current Integral
Protected Areas (IPA) (Dean, 1997; Victor et al.,
2005; Project Mapbiomas, 2020). As a result,
recurrent ornithological studies started covering
large natural areas in Eastern São Paulo (located in
less suitable topographies for human occupation),
such as Serra do Mar and Serra da Mantiqueira
(Camargo, 1946; Pinto, 1978; Willis and Oniki,
2003). Consequently, the Eastern region of São
Paulo presented a greater number of studied and
inventoried locations regarding their avifauna,
while inland areas, whether protected or not, were
less visited for the same purposes (Willis and
Oniki, 2003; Hasui et al., 2018; Rodrigues et al.,
2019).
For several years, researchers have
systematically studied bird communities in few
locations in inland São Paulo, such as a fragment
in Rio Claro (Willis and Oniki, 2002) or in
Itirapina Ecological Station (Motta-Junior et al.,
2008; Willis, 2004). Others have compared
historical and recent records, such as in the
Caetetus Ecological Station (Cavarzere et al.,
2009) and the Ipanema National Forest (Cavarzere
et al., 2017). Other locations with published
records represent sporadic or one-year-cycle
studies (Dias, 2000; Pozza and Pires, 2003;
Develey et al., 2006; Lucindo et al., 2015;
Sementili-Cardoso et al., 2019; Prist et al., 2021)
or locations inventoried for specific purposes
(Gomes et al., 2018). There has also been a joint
effort to initially characterize the bird communities
of 14 IPA in São Paulo (Antunes et al., 2016).
However, many areas, including IPA, remain with
no basic ornithological data, or with dispersed,
overlooked information, preventing their use in
management and conservation actions (Silveira et
al., 2010).
Based on this scenario, we organized and
evaluated the information from different sources.
We further produced new field data on the bird
community of four IPA in inland São Paulo and
their respective municipalities. Our main objective
was to evaluate the knowledge available for little-
known IPA in inland São Paulo and to make the
data available for management, ecotourism,
environmental education, and conservation actions.
2 MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1 Study areas
This study included four IPA and their
respective municipalities located in inland São
Paulo (Figure 1).

47
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Figure 1. State of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil, with the mesoregions and municipalities of inventoried localities: 1)
Andradina - Andradina Biological Reserve, mesoregion of Araçatuba; 2) Marília - Marília Ecological Station,
mesoregion of Marília; 3) Paulo de Faria - Paulo de Faria Ecological Station, mesoregion of São José do Rio Preto; 4)
São Simão - Santa Maria Ecological Station, mesoregion of Ribeirão Preto. Red dots indicate the location of Integral
Protected Areas. Green shadings correspond to the Atlantic Forest, and orange shadings correspond to the Cerrado.
Figura 1. Estado de São Paulo, sudeste do Brasil, com indicação das mesorregiões e municípios das localidades
inventariadas: 1) Andradina - Reserva Biológica de Andradina, mesorregião de Araçatuba; 2) Marília - Estação
Ecológica de Marília, mesorregião de Marília; 3) Paulo de Faria - Estação Ecológica de Paulo de Faria, mesorregião de
São José do Rio Preto; 4) São Simão - Estação Ecológica de Santa Maria, mesorregião de Ribeirão Preto. Os pontos
vermelhos indicam a localização das Unidades de Proteção Integral. Áreas em verde correspondem ao domínio da Mata
Atlântica, e em laranja, ao domínio do Cerrado.
2.1.1 Andradina Biological Reserve
Located in the municipality of Andradina, with
168 ha, it was created on December 17, 1985. It is
inserted within the Seasonal Semideciduous Forest,
with areas in advanced stage of regeneration
(Oliveira, 2009), in addition to anthropic areas,
such as pastures and monocultures. According to
Köppen’s climate classification, Andradina
Biological Reserve is Aw, tropical with dry winters
(Alvares et al., 2013). Field sampling was carried
out in two days with total duration of 16 h,
covering all the boundaries of the IPA, as well as
short trails in the forest fragment, totaling 23 km
(Table 1).
2.1.2 Marília Ecological Station
Located in the municipality of Marília, with
607 ha, it was created on December 28, 2010. It is
inserted within Montane Seasonal Semideciduous
Forest (in interfluve areas) and Alluvial Seasonal
Semideciduous Forest along water courses.
Montane forests occupy 167 ha (28%), with
different stages of regeneration, while alluvial
forests occupy 76 ha (13%), on the banks of the
Tibiriçá River, with different heights and densities
along the river. Pioneer formations comprise 100
ha (17%) of the Ecological Station and
reforestation totals 136 ha (22%). Other
environments constitute different types of
vegetation, including degraded areas (Ivanauskas

48
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
et al., 2017). Compared to mappings from the
1970s, native vegetation has expanded, accounting
for 66% of the IPA, although the exotic
reforestation area has remained constant
(Ivanauskas et al., 2017). A total of 302 species of
vascular flora, 25 of which are exotic, have been
reported (Ivanauskas et al., 2017). According to
Köppen’s climate classification, Marília Ecological
Station is Cfa, humid subtropical with hot summers
(Alvares et al., 2013). In Marília, the average
annual precipitation is 1,428 mm, with a 23.5º C
average temperature, ranging from 17.3º to 29.5º C
(Cepagri, 2014 apud Ivanauskas et al., 2017).
Areas on both sides of the BR-153 highway were
visited along two days (8 h per day), covering the
existing roads on the IPA limits, totaling 4 km
(Table 1).
2.1.3 Paulo de Faria Ecological Station
Located in the municipality of Paulo de Faria,
on the banks of the Grande River, in front of Água
Vermelha Reservoir, on the border of the states of
São Paulo and Minas Gerais, with 435.73 ha, it is
the first Ecological Station created in São Paulo,
established on September 23, 1981. It is inserted
within Seasonal Semideciduous Forest, with 201
plant species (Stranghetti and Ranga, 1998).
Climate has two seasons, a dry season from April
to September (average rainfall of 167 mm), and a
rainy season from October to March (average 978
mm). According to Köeppen’s climate
classification, it is considered Aw, tropical with
dry winters (Alvares et al., 2013). Field sampling
was carried out in four days totaling 16 h, covering
23 km from the Eastern and Western limits of the
Ecological Station, as well as the trail that crosses
it; the left bank of the Água Vermelha Reservoir
was also visited, at 19º55’1.25”S and
49º32’0.44”W (Table 1).
2.1.4 Santa Maria Ecological Station
Located in the municipality of São Simão, with
1,300 ha, it was created on January 13, 2010. It is
inserted within Cerrado, and the predominant
vegetation occupies 510 ha of the Ecological
Station, represented by cerradão woodlot, cerrado
stricto sensu and campo sujo. Another 308 ha of
native vegetation (totaling the 818 ha of native
vegetation of this IPA) are represented by Alluvial,
Deciduous and Semideciduous Seasonal Forests, in
addition to other areas with pioneer formations and
exotic vegetation (Antunes et a., 2016). According
to Köeppen’s climate classification, it is
considered Cwa, humid subtropical with dry
winters and hot summers (Alvares et al., 2013).
Field sampling was carried out in two days totaling
8 h, covering existing roads, as well as some trails,
for a total of 5 km (Table 1).
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We recorded 233 species (four of those were
classified only to genus level) of terrestrial
vertebrates for the ASF (Figure 3).
Table 1. Locations (indicated chronologically by dates of visits) and coordinates, visit dates and sources of bird records
from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State. Numbers correspond to localities in Figures 2-5.
Tabela 1. Localidades (indicadas em ordem cronológica de visitas) e coordenadas, datas de visitas e as fontes dos
registros de aves de quatro unidades de conservação do interior do estado de São Paulo. Os números correspondem as
localidades das Figuras 2-5.
#
Locality
Date
Source
Latitude S
Longitude W
1
REBIO Andradina
May 2008 - April 2009
Oliveira (2009)
-
-
2
Andradina-listas
históricas
September 2021
eBird
20º51'30,51"
51º21'42,98"
3
Rodovia Marechal
Rondon, Andradina
BR-SP
September 2021
eBird
20º51'41.84"
51º25'31"
4
REBIO Andradina
September 13 and 14 2021
This study
20°49'45.07"
51°20'24.54"
5
REBIO Andradina
September 13 and 14 2021
This study
20°50'0.01"
51°20'1.66"
6
Brejo do rio Tibiriçá
October 1982
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
22º5'0"
49º53'0"
to be continued
continua

49
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
#
Locality
Date
Source
Latitude S
Longitude W
7
Fazenda Santa
Terezinha
January 1984
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
22º6'0"
49º58'0"
8
Marília
January 1986
Silva e Silva
(1996)
22º13'
49º56'
9
Marília-área urbana
October 2000 and February 2002
eBird
22º13'9.56"
49º56'53.61"
10
Distrito de Dirceu
July 2007
Xeno-canto
22º8'21.1"
49º54'51.86"
11
-
September 2018
Xeno-canto
22º14'57.48"
49º57'58.68"
12
Mini Pantanal de
Marília
October 2021
eBird
22º8'31.11"
49º54'38.91"
13
17560-000, Marília
BR-SP
October and November 2021
eBird
22º14'17.13"
49º52'18.2"
14
E.Ec. Marília
January 2 and 3 2022
This study
22º0'59.53"
49º55'30.67"
15
E.Ec. Marília
January 2 and 3 2022
This study
22º0'58.3"
49º53'51.12"
16
Cidade
Not informed
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
22º13'0"
49º57'0"
17
E.Ec. Marília
January 22 - 24 2013
Antunes et al.
(2016)
22º0'59.53"
49º55'30.67"
18
E.Ec. Paulo de Faria
1979 - 2004
São Paulo (not
dated)
-
-
19
Cidade
September 1984
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
20º2'0"
49º24'0"
20
Ilha do Marimbondo
September 1984; October 1987
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
20º0'0"
49º16'0"
21
E.Ec. Paulo de Faria
September 1984; October 1987 and 1996
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
19º57'27.1"
49º31'51.23"
22
Mata particular
September 1984
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
19º59'0"
49º33'0"
23
Reserva Estadual
Paulo de Faria
1987
Hasui et al. (2018)
19º56'0"
49º32'0"
24
E.Ec. Paulo de Faria
December 1994; September and October
2020; July and December 2021
eBird
19º56'54.45"
49º31'21.85"
25
Paulo de Faria-
área geral
April 2018
eBird
20º1'55.87"
49º23'52.73"
26
Paulo de Faria-
Prainha (Balsa)
April 2018; December 2021
eBird
19º59'30.15"
49º25'37.85"
27
Paulo de Faria-
Fazenda Tangará
September 2018
eBird
19º59'38.94"
49º18'20.3"
28
Paulo de Faria-
Fazenda Tangará -
Fragmento de mata
September 2018
eBird
19º59'31.02"
49º19'42.5"
29
15490, Paulo de Faria
BR-SP
March 2020
eBird
19º56'7.57"
49º34'54.71"
30
15490, Paulo de Faria
BR-SP
September 2020
eBird
19º55'45.93"
49º35'0.9"
31
15490, Paulo de Faria
BR-SP
September 2020
eBird
19º59'4.45"
49º19'47.61"
32
15490, Paulo de Faria
BR-SP
September 2020
eBird
19º59'49.26"
49º17'11.07"
33
Represa Água
Vermelha, Paulo de
Faria BR-SP
September 2020
eBird
19º59'2.81"
49º19'45.79"
34
15490, Paulo de Faria
BR-SP
July 2021
eBird
20º5'25.68"
49º18'36.7"
35
E.Ec. Paulo de Faria
September 14 and 15 2021 and January 3
and 4 2022
This study
19º57'27.1"
49º31'51.23"
36
E.Ec. Paulo de Faria
September 14 and 15 2021 and January 3
and 4 2022
This study
19º55'3.28"
49º31'58.56"
to be continued
continua

50
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
#
Locality
Date
Source
Latitude S
Longitude W
37
E.Ec. Paulo de Faria
Not informed
Hasui et al. (2018)
19º56'0"
49º32'0"
38
Ilha do Marimbondo
Not informed
Hasui et al. (2018)
20º0'0"
49º16'0"
39
Paulo de Faria
Not informed
Hasui et al. (2018)
19º59'0"
49º33'0"
40
Reserva Estadual
Not informed
Hasui et al. (2018)
19º58'0"
49º31'0"
41
Reserva Estadual
Paulo de Faria
Not informed
Hasui et al. (2018)
19º56'0"
49º32'0"
42
-
Not informed
Hasui et al. (2018)
20º6'0"
49º32'0"
43
Fazenda Aretuzina
October 1998
Willis (2002)
21º26'0"
47º35'0"
44
São Simão-área geral
October and Novermber 2014, 2015 and
2016; Novermber 2017; February, May,
June and October 2018; March 2019
eBird
21º28'44"
47º33'3"
45
São Simão-Cerradão
do Assentamento
Mario Covas
March 2020
eBird
21º25'41.24"
47º35'46.74"
46
São Simão-Cerradão
do Urubitinga
March 2020
eBird
21º30'38.66"
47º26'45.07"
47
E.Ec. Santa Maria
January 6 and 7 2022
This study
21º24'4,31"
47º36'15.17"
48
E.Ec. Santa Maria
January 6 and 7 2022
This study
21º23'59.95"
47º37'38.27"
49
E.Ec. Santa Maria
January 6 and 7 2022
This study
21º22'17.16"
47º38'39.48"
50
"Cerradão"
Not informed
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
21º25'0"
47º36'0"
51
Estação Ferroviária
Sucuri
Not informed
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
21º31'0"
47º31'0"
52
Fazenda Aretuzina
Not informed
Willis and Oniki
(2003)
21º26'0"
47º35'0"
53
Cerradão
Not informed
Hasui et al. (2018)
21º25'0"
47º36'0"
54
-
Not informed
Hasui et al. (2018)
21º28'0"
47º33'0"
55
E.Ec. Santa Maria
May 4 - 7 2015
Antunes et al.
(2016)
-
-
2.2 Field data
We used 10-species lists, in which 10 species are
annotated in sequence, without repetition, while
observers walk along transects. Species that have
already been detected can only be enrolled again in
subsequent lists. Thus, sampling effort is given as
the number of accumulated lists (Ribon, 2010). We
also determined List Frequency Indexes (IFL, in
Portuguese) for each species per locality, dividing
the number of times each species was detected per
location by the total number of lists accumulated in
that location (Ribon, 2010). We started
observations about 15 min before sunrise,and birds
were visually identified with binoculars, and
aurally. Inventories were carried out from
September 14, 2021 to January 7, 2022, totaling 10
days and 40 h. The authors VC and FS conducted
inventories within IPA between 2021 and 2022
(Table 1), while TVVC qualitatively collected
information over 10 years (2009 - 2019) within the
municipality of Marília.
2.3 Secondary data
Secondary data were obtained by reviewing
articles, books, book chapters, as well as technical
documents. We used databases such as Directory
of Open Access Journals – DOAJ, Google Scholar,
Scielo, Scopus, JSTOR and Web of Knowledge,
with combinations of words: birds, avifauna (both
Portuguese and English), Andradina, Marília,
Paulo de Faria, Santa Maria, and São Simão. We
also consulted, until July 19, 2022, data available
on online platforms such as eBird
(www.ebird.org), iNaturalist
(https://www.inaturalist.org), Global Biodiversity
Information Facility – GBIF
(https://www.gbif.org), WikiAves

51
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
(www.wikiaves.com.br), and Xeno-Canto
(www.xeno-canto.org).
2.4 Analyses
For taxonomy and phylogenetic sequences of
bird species, recommendations of the Brazilian
Committee of Ornithological Records (Pacheco et
al., 2021) were followed. Species were classified
as Cerrado (Silva, 1995) or Atlantic Forest (Vale et
al., 2018) endemics. For threat levels we consulted
red lists at state (São Paulo, 2018), national (Brasil,
2022) and global (IUCN, 2021) levels.
We constructed species accumulation curves in
R (R Core Team, 2020), as well as calculated
Chao2 non-parametric species estimator, which
weighs the presence of rare species (Colwell and
Coddington, 1994). We then generated heatmaps
based on the number of species by location with
QGis (Qgis Development Team, 2019), with a
0.02º resolution.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We found eight studies on birds that included
the localities of interest, five of which were
published (Silva e Silva, 1996; Willis, 2002; Willis
and Oniki, 2003; Antunes et al., 2016; Hasui et al.,
2018) and the remainder corresponded to
management plans (São Paulo, not dated) or an
unpublished thesis (Oliveira, 2009) developed
within IPA. Of all records, we determined that 10
species corresponded to misidentification because
they resemble species whose distribution is not
congruent with the study areas. Such species,
Penelope obscura Temminck, 1815, Patagioenas
plumbea (Vieillot, 1818), Aramides saracura
(Spix, 1825), Himantopus mexicanus (Statius
Muller, 1776), Picumnus cirratus Temminck,
1825, Brotogeris tirica (Gmelin, 1788),
Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus (Latham, 1790),
Grallaria varia (Boddaert, 1783), Cacicus cela
(Linnaeus, 1758) e Coryphospingus pileatus
(Wied, 1821), therefore, were not included in this
compendium as they deserve attention regarding
their proper documentation.
Based on these studies and on ornithological
platforms data, we determined that the four IPA
and their respective municipalities have 358 bird
species (26 orders and 65 families), five of which
are endemic to the Cerrado (Silva, 1995) and nine,
to the Atlantic Forest (Vale et al., 2018). This total
corresponds to 45% of all bird species in the state
of São Paulo (Silveira and Uezu, 2011). Of these,
25 are threatened according to the state red list,
being Coryphaspiza melanotis (Temminck, 1822)
extinct in São Paulo. At the national level, two
species are Endangered and another three are
Vulnerable; at the global level, one species is
Endangered and three are Vulnerable (Appendix
1). Considering only IPA, our primary data
resulted in 278 species (25 orders and 61 families),
five of which are endemic to the Cerrado, four to
the Atlantic Forest, and 16 threatened with
extinction at the state level, four of which are
Critically Endangered, two Endangered, and 10
Vulnerable (Appendix 1). For secondary data, 354
species were detected within IPA. Species
recorded in municipalities and outside IPA were
316 (25 orders and 64 families), sharing the five
Cerrado endemics and another six species endemic
to the Atlantic Forest. There were 23 threatened
species in São Paulo, six of them Critically
Endangered, five Endangered, and 11 Vulnerable.
One Regionally Extinct species was recorded only
outside IPA. Species exclusively recorded within
IPA accounted for 11% (38), while those
exclusively recorded outside IPA totaled 76 (21%).
All Cerrado endemic species had records inside
and outside IPA, while five of the nine Atlantic
Forest endemic species were only recorded outside
them. Four out of the eight Critically Endangered
species, two out of the five Endangered species,
and 10 out of the 12 Vulnerable species in São
Paulo, are found within IPA (Appendix 1).
3.1 Andradina
Andradina Biological Reserve was first
inventoried between May 2008 and April 2009,
when 100 species were recorded in 192 hours of
observations (Oliveira, 2009). Our records (26
lists) detected 103 species (39 exclusive), of which
64 were common to both studies. Overall, this
Biological Reserve had 139 species. Of these,
Antilophia galeata (Lichtenstein, 1823) is the only
endemic species (Cerrado) in the area. Three
species are Vulnerable, and one of them, Ara
ararauna (Linnaeus, 1758), was only recorded
during the first inventory at the site. The same
species was recorded by us, however, in an urban
area of the municipality (Appendix 1). Notably,
this locality does not have Atlantic Forest endemic
species, since it is located less than 50 km
Northeast of Valparaíso, where, in the 1950s,
dozens of endemic species were collected (Pinto,
1978). Possibly, the de-characterization of the
vegetation has resulted in the loss of such species
over time (Ribon et al., 2003).
The other areas visited within Andradina had 80
species, none of these are endemic, one

52
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Endangered and two Vulnerable. Because
WikiAves platform, which contributed with 79
species, does not provide coordinates, only the
records from the eBird platform could be inserted
into the map of records of the municipality. Such
records refer to two locations, each with one
species (Figure 2A). The heatmap shows greater
species richness within the Biological Reserve due
to the greater sampling effort accumulated therein
(Figure 2B). In this case, although little studied,
Andradina Biological Reserve has greater
information compared to the other localities visited
in the municipality.
Figure 2. A) Localities where bird inventories were carried out in the municipality of Andradina, inland São Paulo
State. B) Heatmap indicating the inventoried localities with the highest and lowest bird species richness in Andradina.
Figura 2. A) Localidades onde foram realizados inventários de aves no município de Andradina, interior do estado de
São Paulo. B) Mapa de calor indicando os pontos amostrados com maiores e menores valores de riqueza de espécies de
aves em Andradina.
3.2 Marília
Marília Ecological Station has been previously
inventoried (Antunes et al., 2016). In that study,
the authors recorded 143 species. In 10 lists, we
recorded 102 species (16 exclusive), of which 86
were common to both studies. Overall, Marília
Ecological Station had 159 species. Of these,
Cyanocorax cristatellus (Temminck, 1823) is
endemic to the Cerrado, and two species are
endemic to the Atlantic Forest. One Vulnerable
species, Primolius maracana (Vieillot, 1816), was
only recorded during the first inventory at the site
(Appendix 1). The most important population of
this parrot is located approximately 50 km to the
Southeast, in Caetetus Ecological Station (Nunes
and Galetti, 2007). Within the same mesoregion,
Caetetus is a well-preserved forest remnant,
subject to earlier (Willis and Oniki, 1981;
Cavarzere et al., 2009), although with few, recent
studies (Christianini, 2018).
The remaining areas visited within Marília had
236 species, three of which are endemic to the
Cerrado and one to the Atlantic Forest; there were
two Vulnerable species. WikiAves platform, which
contributed with 230 species, does not provide
coordinates. Therefore, the records of the eBird
(128 species) and Xeno-canto (14 species)
platforms, as well as other sources, included
another nine localities, which could be inserted in
the municipality map of records (Figure 3A). The
heatmap shows the greatest species richness within
Marília Ecological Station, but locations numbers
9, 11 and 13 stood out regarding their species
richness (Figure 3B). Marília Ecological Station
showed greater knowledge compared to the other
localities visited within the municipality.

53
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Figure 3. A) Localities where bird inventories were carried out in the municipality of Marília. B) Heatmap indicating
inventoried localities with the highest and lowest bird species richness in Marília.
Figura 3. A) Localidades onde foram realizados inventários de aves no município de Marília. B) Mapa de calor
indicando os pontos amostrados com maiores e menores valores de riqueza de espécies de aves em Marília.
3.3 Paulo de Faria
Paulo de Faria Ecological Station was
mentioned in three references (Willis and Oniki,
2003; Hasui et al., 2018; São Paulo, not dated),
which reported 1, 68 and 199 species, respectively.
In 17 lists, we recorded 112 species (five unique).
Overall, Paulo de Faria Ecological Station had 230
species. Of these, four species are endemic to the
Atlantic Forest. One species, Crax fasciolata Spix,
1825, is Vulnerable at the global level, while three
are Critically Endangered, two are Endangered and
eight are Vulnerable at the state level. Our recent
inventories detected only three Vulnerable species
(Appendix 1). This Ecological Station still had
fewer Atlantic Forest endemic species compared to
the nearest well-preserved remnant, situated in the
Municipality of Matão, ca. 160 km to the Southeast
(Bispo et al., 2011).
During our first visit (September 2021), we
witnessed a severe drought that had been lasting
for several months, and that may have accounted
for less records of birds. Nonetheless, the number
of endemic species was higher compared to the
other three IPA. We also noticed that the landscape
around Paulo de Faria was not composed
exclusively of monocultures and pastures. Indeed,
even pastures presented several isolated trees and
small forest remnants (Vagner Cavarzere, personal
communication), which may be associated with the
percentage of forest cover necessary to minimize
the effects of fragmentation on different spatial
scales (Bhakti et al., 2018; Morante-Filho et al.,
2021).
The remaining areas visited in Paulo de Faria
had 207 species, one endemic to the Atlantic
Forest, and one globally Critically Endangered
species, in addition to three Critically Endangered,
three Endangered and nine Vulnerable species in
São Paulo. WikiAves platform, which contributed
with 51 species, does not provide coordinates.
Therefore, the records on the eBird platform (112
species), as well as the other references, added up
to another 15 localities, which could be inserted in
the municipality map of records (Figure 4A). The
heatmap shows the greatest richness within the
Paulo de Faria Ecological Station, also
highlighting the high species richness on the banks
of the Grande River, on the border with Minas
Gerais (Figure 4B). Paulo de Faria Ecological
Station has greater information compared to the
other localities visited.

54
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Figure 4. A) Localities where bird inventories were carried out in the municipality of Paulo de Faria. B) Heatmap
indicating the inventoried localities with the highest and lowest bird species richness in Paulo de Faria.
Figura 4. A) Localidades onde foram realizados inventários de aves no município de Paulo de Faria. B) Mapa de calor
indicando os pontos amostrados com maiores e menores valores de riqueza de espécies de aves em Paulo de Faria.
3.4 São Simão
Santa Maria Ecological Station was initially
inventoried in 2o15, when 119 species were
mentioned (Antunes et al., 2016). In nine lists, we
recorded 87 species (22 exclusive). Overall, Santa
Maria Ecological Station had 141 species. Of
these, five species are endemic to the Cerrado.
Laterallus xenopterus Conover, 1934 is globally
Vulnerable and nationally Endangered, whereas at
the state level it is Critically Endangered. The
Rufous-faced Crake has few records in the state
and was first documented in the Itirapina region
(Willis, 2004). It has few other published records,
such as in Santa Bárbara Ecological Station
(Lucindo et al., 2015). For Santa Maria, there is
also a record of Myiothlypis leucophrys (Pelzeln,
1868), Vulnerable in São Paulo (Appendix 1),
which is limited to the West by the right margin of
the Tietê River (Willis and Oniki, 2003). This IPA
is the only situated within the Cerrado, and the
presence of savanna-endemic species were
expected. It also suggests those five species are
widely distributed in the municipality, and
appropriate habitats are still found inside the
Ecological Station. Our recent inventories,
however, did not detect those species.
The remaining areas visited in São Simão had
215 species, five of which are endemic to the
Cerrado and four to the Atlantic Forest (Willis,
2002; Willis and Oniki, 2003; Hasui et al., 2018).
Five species are endemic to the Cerrado and
another four to the Atlantic Forest. Two species are
threatened, one is Endangered and one is
Vulnerable at a global level, and in addition to
these, four more species are threatened in Brazil. In
São Paulo, three are Critically Endangered, one
Endangered and two Vulnerable species. WikiAves
platform, which contributed with 178 species, does
not provide coordinates. Therefore, the records on
the eBird platform (97 species), as well as the other
sources, added up to another six localities, which
could be inserted in the map of records of the
municipality (Figure 5A). The heatmap shows
similar species richness values inside and outside
Santa Maria Ecological Station (Figure 5B). This
suggests that representative remnants of distinct
habitats may not be found within the Ecological
Station. For example, cerradão woodlots (localities
45, 50 and 53), are all distributed outside this
IPA’s limits (Willis and Oniki, 2003; Hasui et al.,
2018.

55
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Figure 5. A) Localities where bird inventories were carried out in the municipality of São Simão. B) Heatmap indicating
the inventoried localities with the highest and lowest bird species richness in São Simão.
Figura 5. A) Localidades onde foram realizados inventários de aves no município de São Simão. B) Mapa de calor
indicando os pontos amostrados com maiores e menores valores de riqueza de espécies de aves em São Simão.
Figure 6. Species accumulation curve of the IPA based on the number of lists. Sest = number of estimated species
according to the non-parametric Chao2 estimator. Shades around lines indicate standard deviation intervals.
Figura 6. Curva de acumulação de espécies das UPI amostradas com base em número de listas de espécies. Sest =
número de espécies estimado segundo o estimador não paramétrico Chao2. Áreas ao redor das linhas indicam intervalos
de desvio padrão.

56
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Although many authors have conducted studies
in IPA where the Atlantic Forest has remained
partially unchanged due to the Serra do Mar relief,
researchers have been less dedicated to the
remnants of Midwest and Northeast São Paulo
(Bispo et al, 2011; Antunes et al., 2016; Hasui et
al., 2018; Rodrigues et al., 2019). Based on our
results, it becomes clear why these regions need
recent ornithological inventories and monitoring,
since little is known about their respective bird
communities. Our inventories are the first
specifically devoted to address the bird
communities of two of the four studied areas. In
this context, E. O. Willis and Y. Oniki were the
researchers who contributed the most to the
ornithological knowledge of inland São Paulo,
highlighting this lack of information 40 years ago
(Willis and Oniki, 1981, 2003). Little has changed
since then.
On the one hand, our results are significant for
better characterizing the bird communities of the
four IPA we visited. On the other hand, we caution
that the bird diversity within those areas may
already be considerably lost given we failed to find
some endemic or threatened species. Clearly,
imperfect detection plays an important role when
considering species occupancy (MacKenzie et al.,
2002). Even though, when analyzing past records,
several Atlantic Forest endemic species were not
detected at Andradina, Marília or Paulo de Faria.
One can assume that early records in pristine
forests might indicate how habitat modification
acted in changing forest bird communities. The
municipality of Valparaíso is one such place, as
mentioned above (Pinto, 1978). Researchers who
monitored fragments for decades also documented
the loss of species and ecological guilds (Willis,
1979; Antunes, 2005). Furthermore, endemic
species still occur in preserved and large forest
fragments in inland São Paulo, such as Caetetus
Ecological Station, Morro do Diabo State Park and
a private forest in the municipality of Matão
(Cavarzere et al., 2009; Bispo et al., 2011; Hasui et
al., 2018). Once again, E. O. Willis and Y. Oniki
were proven right, as they noticed such losses
almost half a century ago (Willis and Oniki, 1992).
3.5 Threatened species with current records
Of the 26 species under threat categories in São
Paulo, 15 were present within the four IPA, but we
only recorded five of them. As the species
accumulation curves failed to reach asymptotes,
our sampling effort may have been insufficient to
record more endangered species. However, one
should not rule out the hypothesis that the
populations of such species may be reduced,
making their detections less evident. Information
on endangered species detected in the field is
presented below.
Crypturellus undulatus (Vulnerable). We heard
six individuals at Paulo de Faria Ecological
Station. Usually, this species is found in riparian
forests, and its presence indicates the preservation
of this important environment (Sick, 1997). In the
state of São Paulo, its main threat is habitat loss,
forest fragmentation and hunting (Antunes, 2009a).
Phaetusa simplex (Vulnerable). We observed a
small group, with five individuals, foraging and
resting in Grande River, in front of Paulo de Faria
Ecological Station. This is a typical species of
rivers in inland São Paulo, it is threatened due to
habitat modification, such as water bodies and
beaches where it nests, in addition to the
disordered recreational use of the rivers (Schunck,
2009).
Mosana nigrifrons (Vulnerable). We heard two,
and about 10 individuals, along forest edges at
Andradina Biological Reserve and Paulo de Faria
Ecological Station, respectively. It is a typical
species of riparian forests in the West and
Northwest of São Paulo, threatened by habitat loss
and forest fragmentation (Uezu, 2009).
Pteroglossus castanotis (Vulnerable). We heard
one individual at Paulo de Faria Ecological Station.
This species is found throughout inland São Paulo,
but its populations seem to be less noticeable in
fragments of the Midwest São Paulo when
compared to inland Paraná State (e.g. Quagliato
and Cavarzere, 2021). Its main threat is habitat loss
and forest fragmentation (Figueiredo, 2009).
Ara ararauna (Vulnerable). We saw a pair
flying over the urban area of Andradina. A typical
species from inland São Paulo, it has disappeared
from many regions in recent decades due to habitat
degradation, forest fragmentation and capture for
wild animal illegal trade (Antunes, 2009b).
However, recent records from online platforms
(WikiAves, eBird) show a wider range than that
observed until 2009 (Antunes, 2009b), indicating a
possible population recovery of the species,
reintroduction of the species in inland São Paulo,
or a greater coverage of bird watchers. Such
speculations are not mutually exclusive and
demand further investigation.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The municipalities had few published bird
inventories, and most of the information originated
from online ornithological platforms. For one of
the four inventoried IPA, we gathered as much

57
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
information from inside as from outside its
boundaries and, generally, all of them remain with
incipient information about their bird communities.
Within IPA, we recently failed to detect 10
endangered species that had been recorded in the
past. Thus, we reinforce the need to monitor these
IPA, which represent the last fragments of
preserved native vegetation in their respective
municipalities.
5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais
(IPA) for authorization IF.006245/2021-66 to carry
out scientific research at Ecological Stations, and
the staff, especially the managers Osmar Vilas
Bôas, Nelson Gallo and Patrícia Barbosa Fazano
(Marília), Alírio Fábio (Paulo de Faria) and Paulo
Henrique Peira Ruffino and Maico D. Correa Porto
(Santa Maria) for information about the areas. We
are also grateful to Instituto Agronômico,
Biológico e de Zootecnia on behalf of Neli
Belmiro dos Santos for authorizing the research at
Andradina. Aline Corrêa clarified the validity of
the subspecies of Pulsatrix perspicilata, and Karlla
Barbosa helped on several field trips. VC is
grateful to the following institutions for funding or
donating equipment that made this study possible:
IdeaWild, The Rufford Foundation (18269-1) and
CNPq (PDJ-503496/2014-6). The English version
of this manuscript was revised by Tikinet thanks to
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Naturais
e Sustentabilidade (UTFPR-SH).
REFERENCES
ALVARES, C.A. et al. Köppen’s climate
classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische
Zeitschrift, v. 22, n. 6, p. 711–728, 2013.
_____. Alterações na composição da comunidade
de aves ao longo do tempo em um fragmento
florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Ararajuba, v. 13, n.
1, p. 47–61, 2005.
_____. Crypturellus undulatus (Temminck, 1815)
Tinamiformes, Tinamidae. In: BRESSAN, P.M. et
al. (Ed). Fauna ameaçada de extinção no estado
de São Paulo: vertebrados. São Paulo: Fundação
Parque Zoológico de São Paulo e Secretaria do
Meio Ambiente, 2009a. p. 103.
_____. Ara ararauna (Linnaeus, 1758). In:
BRESSAN, P.M. et al. (Ed). Fauna ameaçada de
extinção no estado de São Paulo: vertebrados.
São Paulo: Fundação Parque Zoológico de São
Paulo e Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, 2009b. p.
162.
_____.; KANASHIRO, M.M.; ESTON, M.R. Aves
registradas em 14 áreas protegidas no interior do
estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista do Instituto
Florestal, v. 28, n. 2 p. 135-157, 2016.
BHAKTI, T. et al. Does scale matter? The
influence of three-level spatial scales on forest bird
occurrence in a tropical landscape. PloS one, v. 13,
n. 6, p. e0198732, 2018.
BISPO, A.A. et al. Aves da região noroeste do
estado de São Paulo. In: JÚNIOR, O. N. (Ed.).
Fauna e flora de fragmentos florestais
remanescentes da região noroeste do estado de
São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto: Holos Editora, 2011. p.
242–268.
BRASIL. Portaria MMA n° 148, de 7 de junho de
2022. Altera os Anexos da Portaria n° 443, de 17
de dezembro de 2014, da Portaria nº 444, de 17 de
dezembro de 2014, e da Portaria n° 445, de 17 de
dezembro de 2014, referentes à atualização da
Lista Nacional de Espécies Ameaçadas de
Extinção. Diário Oficial da União, v. 148, p. 1-89,
2022.
CAMARGO, H.F.A. Sobre uma pequena coleção
de aves de Boracéia e do Varjão do Guaratuba
(Estado de São Paulo). Papéis Avulsos de
Zoologia, v. 7, p. 143–164, 1946.
_____. Helmuth Pinder, o primeiro coletor e
taxidermista de aves do Museu Paulista.
Ararajuba, v. 6, n. 1, p. 54–57, 1998.
CAVARZERE, V. et al. Avifauna da Estação
Ecológica dos Caetetus, interior de São Paulo,
Brasil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, v. 49, n. 35,
p. 477–485, 2009.
_____. et al. Museum collections indicate bird
defaunation in a biodiversity hotspot. Biota
Neotropica, v. 17, n. 4, p. e20170404, 2017.
CHRISTIANINI, A.V. Several cavity-nesting birds
fight for a single tree hollow in an Atlantic Forest
fragment: consequence of increasing nest-site
limitation? Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, v.
26, n. 1, p. 12–14, 2018.
COLWELL, R.K.; CODDINGTON, J.A.
Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through
extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological
Sciences, v. 345, n. 1311, p. 101–118, 1994.

58
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
DEAN, W. A ferro e fogo: a história da
devastação da Mata Atlantica brasileira. Rio de
Janeiro: Companhia das letras, 1997.484 p.
DEVELEY, P.F.; CAVANA, D.D.; PIVELLO,
V.R. Aves. In: PIVELLO, V.R.; VARANDA,
E.M.O. (Eds.) Cerrado Pé-de-Gigante (Parque
Estadual de Vassununga, São Paulo) – Ecologia
e Conservação. São Paulo: Secretaria do Meio
Ambiente do Estado de São Paulo, 2006. p. 121-
134.
DIAS, M.M. Avifauna das Estações Ecológica de
Jataí e Experimental de Luiz Antônio, São Paulo,
Brasil. In: SANTOS, J.E.; PIRES, J.S.R. (Eds.).
Estação Ecológica de Jataí. São Paulo: Rima,
2000. p. 285-301.
eBird. eBird: An online database of bird
distribution and abundance, 2022. Available from:
<https://ebird.org/>. Accessed in: 14 Jan. 2022.
FIGUEIREDO, L.F.A. Pteroglossus castanotis
Gould, 1834. In: BRESSAN, P.M. et al. (Eds.).
Fauna ameaçada de extinção no estado de São
Paulo: vertebrados. São Paulo: Fundação Parque
Zoológico de São Paulo e Secretaria do Meio
Ambiente, 2009. p. 199.
GBIF. GBIF Home Page, 2022. Available from
<https://www.gbif.org/>. Accessed in: 13 Jan.
2022.
GOMES, A.P.N. et al. The importance of protected
areas for conservation of bare-faced curassow
(Crax fasciolata spix, 1825) (Galliformes:
Cracidae) in the São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota
Neotropica, v. 18, n. 3, p. e20180524, 2018.
GROLA, D.A. O comércio de espécimes na
formação das coleções de História Natural do
Museu Paulista, 1894-1916. In: SEMINÁRIO
NACIONAL DE HISTÓRIA DA CIÊNCIA E DA
TECNOLOGIA, 13., 2012, São Paulo. Anais...
São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de História da
Ciência, 2012. p.800-817.
HASUI, É. et al. ATLANTIC BIRDS: a data set of
bird species from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
Ecology, v. 99, n. 2, p. 497, 2018.
iNaturalist. iNaturalist, 2022. Available from:
<https://inaturalist.org/>. Accessed in: 14 Jan.
2022.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR
CONSERVATION OF NATURE – IUCN. The
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Availabel
at: <https://www.iucnredlist.org>. Acesso em: 6
set. 2021.
IVANAUSKAS, N.M. et al. Diagnóstico e
propostas de manejo da vegetação da Estação
Ecológica de Marília, SP, sudeste do Brasil. IF
Série Registros, v. 55, p. 29–73, 2017.
LUCINDO, A.D.S. et al. Aves da Estação
Ecológica de Santa Bárbara, um dos últimos
remanescentes de Cerrado no Estado de São Paulo,
Brasil. Biota Neotropica, v. 15, n. 4, p. e0155,
2015.
MACKENZIE, D.I. et al. Estimating site
occupancy rates when detection probabilities are
less than one. Ecology, v. 83, n. 8, p. 2248–2255,
2002.
MORANTE-FILHO, J.C et al. Landscape
composition is the strongest determinant of bird
occupancy patterns in tropical forest patches.
Landscape Ecology, v. 36, n. 1, p. 105–117, 2021.
MOTTA-JUNIOR, J.C et al. Aves da Estação
Ecológica de Itirapina, estado de São Paulo, Brasil.
Biota Neotropica, v. 8, n. 3, p. 00308032008,
2008.
NUNES, M.F.C.; GALETTI, M. Use of forest
fragments by blue-winged macaws (Primolius
maracana) within a fragmented landscape.
Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 16, p. 953–
967, 2007.
OLIVEIRA, L.V.L. Levantamento preliminar da
avifauna em área ecótone no interior do estado
de São Paulo. 2009. 41 f. Monografia (Graduação
em Ciências Biológicas). Universidade Federal do
Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande.
PACHECO, J.F. et al. Annotated checklist of the
birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological
Records Committee—second edition. Ornithology
Research, v. 29, n. 2, p. 94–105, 2021.
PELZELN, A. Zur Ornithologie Brasiliens:
Resultate von Johann Natterers Reisen in den
Jahren 1817 bis 1835. 1. ed. Wien: A. Pichler’s
Witwe & Sohn, 1868. 462 p.

59
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
PINTO, O.M.O. Cinquenta anos de investigação
ornitológica. Arquivos de Zoologia, v. 4, p. 265–
340, 1945.
_____. Novo catálogo das aves do brasil; 1a Parte
aves não Passeriformes e Passeriformes não
Oscines, com exclusão da família Tyrannidae.
Revista do Museu Paulista, v. 22, p. 1–566, 1978.
_____. A ornitologia do Brasil através das
idades (século XVI a século XIX). São Paulo:
Empresa Gráf. da Revista dos Tribunais, 1979. 117
p.
POZZA, D.D.; PIRES, J.S.R. Bird communities in
two fragments of semideciduous forest in rural São
Paulo State. Brazilian Journal of Biology, v. 62,
v. 2, p. 307-319, 2003.
PROJECT MAPBIOMAS. Collection 6.0 of
Brazilian Land Cover & Use Map Series, 2020.
Available from: <https://mapbiomas.org/>.
Accessed in: 14 Jan. 2022.
QGIS DEVELOPMENT TEAM. QGIS
Geographic Information System. Open Source
Geospatial Foundation Project, 2019. Available
from: <http://qgis.osgeo.org>. Accessed in: 10 Jan.
2022.
QUAGLIATO, I.S.; CAVARZERE, V. An
ornithological inventory in a reforested woodlot in
western Paraná state, southern Brazil. Papéis
Avulsos de Zoologia, v. 61, p. e20216130, 2021.
R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment
for statistical computing, 2020. Available from:
<https://www.r-project.org/>. Accessed in: 05 Jan.
2022.
RIBON, R. Amostragem de aves pelo método de
listas de Mackinnon. In: VON MATTER, S. et al.
Ornitologia e Conservação. Rio de Janeiro:
Technical Books, 2010. p. 1–16.
_____. et al. Bird extinctions in Atlantic forest
fragments of the Viçosa region, southeastern
Brazil. Conservation Biology, v. 17, n. 6, p.
1827–1839, 2003.
RODRIGUES, R.C. et al. ATLANTIC BIRD
TRAITS: a data set of bird morphological traits
from the Atlantic forests of South America.
Ecology, v. 100, n. 6, p. e02647, 2019.
SÃO PAULO. Plano de Manejo. Estação
Ecológica Paulo de Faria. São Paulo: SMA, not
dated. 483 p.
______. Decreto no 63.853, de 27 de novembro
de 2018. Declara as espécies da fauna silvestre
no Estado de São Paulo regionalmente extintas,
as ameaçadas de extinção, as quase ameaçadas e
as com dados insuficientes para avaliação, e dá
providências correlatas, 2018. Available from:
<https://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/de
creto/2018/decreto-63853-27.11.2018.html>.
Accessed in: 14 Jan. 2022.
SCHUNCK, F. Phaethusa simplex (Thunberg,
1823). In: BRESSAN, P.M et al. (Ed.). Fauna
Ameaçada de extinção no Estado de São Paulo -
Vertebrados. São Paulo: Fundação Parque
Zoológico de São Paulo e Secretaria do Meio
Ambiente, 2009. p. 154.
SEMENTILI-CARDOSO, G.; VIANNA, R.M.;
GEROTTI, R.W.; DONATELLI, R.J. A bird
survey in a transitional area between two major
conservation hotspots in southeastern Brazil.
Check List, v. 15, n. 3, p. 527–548, 2019.
SICK, H. Ornitologia Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro:
Nova Fronteira, 1997. 862 p.
SILVA, J.M.C. Birds of the Cerrado Region, South
America. Steenstrupia, v. 21, p. 69–92, 1995.
SILVA E SILVA, R. Records and geographical
distribution of the Peregrine Falcon (Falco
peregrinus Tunstall, 1771) in Brazil. Papéis
Avulsos de Zoologia, v. 39, n. 13, p. 249–270,
1996.
SILVEIRA, L.F. et al. Para que servem os
inventários de fauna? Estudos avançados, v. 24,
n. 68, p. 173–207, 2010.
______.; UEZU, A. Checklist das aves do Estado
de São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropica, v. 11, n.
suppl 1, p. 83–110, 2011.
STRANGHETTI, V.; RANGA, N. Levantamento
florístico das espécies vasculares da floresta
estacional mesófila semidecídua da Estação
Ecológica de Paulo de Faria - SP. Brazilian
Journal of Botany, v. 21, n. 3, p. 289–298, 1998.
UEZU, A. Monasa nigrifrons Spix, 1824. In:
BRESSAN, P.M. et al. (Ed.). Fauna Ameaçada
de extinção no Estado de São Paulo -
Vertebrados. São Paulo: Fundação Parque
Zoológico de São Paulo e Secretaria do Meio
Ambiente, 2009. p. 194.

60
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
VALE, M.M. et al. Endemic birds of the Atlantic
Forest: traits, conservation status, and patterns of
biodiversity. Journal of Field Ornithology, v. 89,
n. 3, p. 193–206, 2018.
VICTOR, M. et al. Cem anos de devastação:
revisitada 30 anos depois. Brasília: Ministério do
Meio Ambiente, 2005. 68 p.
WILLIS, E.O. The composition of avian
communities in remanescent woodlots in southern
Brazil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, v. 33, p. 1–
25, 1979.
WILLIS, E.O. Birds at Eucalyptus and other
flowers in Southern Brazil: A review. Ararajuba,
v. 10, n. 1, p. 43–66, 2002.
_____. Birds of a habitat spectrum in the Itirapina
savanna, São Paulo, Brazil (1982-2003). Brazilian
Journal of Biology, v. 64, n. 4, p. 901–910, 2004.
______., E.O.; ONIKI, Y. Levantamento
preliminar de aves em treze áreas do Estado de São
Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, v. 41, n. 1,
p. 121–135, 1981.
_____, E.O.; ONIKI, Y. Losses of São Paulo birds
are worse in the interior than in Atlantic forest.
Ciência e Cultura, v. 44, n. 5, p. 326–328, 1992.
_____; ONIKI, Y. Birds of a central São Paulo
woodlot: 1. Censuses 1982-2000. Brazilian
Journal of Biology, v. 62, n. 2, p. 197–210, 2002.
______.; ONIKI, Y. Aves do estado de São
Paulo. Rio Claro: Divisa, 2003. 398 p.
WikiAves. WikiAves – A enciclopédia das Aves
do Brasil, 2022. Available from
<http://wikiaves.com.br/>. Accessed in: 15 Jan.
2022.
Xeno-canto. Xeno-canto. Sharing wildlife sounds
from around the world, 2022. Available from
<https://xeno-canto.org/>. Accessed in: 16 Jan.
2022.

61
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Appendix 1. List of bird species recorded in four municipalities of interior São Paulo state, Southeastern
Brazil. MA = Atlantic Forest endemic species, CE = Cerrado endemic species. Species are classified
according to state (SP), country (BR) and global (IUCN) threat. VU = vulnerable, EN = endangered, CR =
critically endangered, RE = regionally extinct. Ornithological platforms: A = eBird, B = WikiAves, C =
Xeno-canto. References: 1 = Willis (2002); 2 = Willis and Oniki (2003) – m: museum record, c: authors’
own record, lit: literature until 1990; 3 = Oliveira (2009); 4 = Antunes (2018a); 5 = Hasui et al. (2018) – m:
museum record, lit: literature record until 2017, obs: ornithologists’ record; 6 = São Paulo (2019); 7 = this
study – s: September 2021, j: January 2022; P = management plan (not dated).
Apêndice 1. Lista de espécies de aves registradas em quatro municípios do interior do estado de São Paulo,
sudeste do Brasil. MA = espécie endêmica da Mata Atlântica, CE = espécie endêmica do Cerrado. As
espécies estão classificadas de acordo com ameaças em nível de estado (SP), país (BR) e global (IUCN). VU
= vulnerável, EN = em perigo, CR = criticamente em perigo, RE = regionalmente extinto. Plataformas
ornitológicas: A = eBird, B = WikiAves, C = Xeno-canto. Referências: 1 = Willis (2002); 2 = Willis e Oniki
(2003) – m: registro de museus, c: registro dos próprios autores, lit: literatura até 1990; 3 = Oliveira (2009); 4
= Antunes (2018a); 5 = Hasui et al. (2018) – m: registro de museus, lit: registro proveniente da literatura até
2017, obs: registros de ornitólogos; 6 = São Paulo (2019); 7 = este estudo – s: setembro de 2021, j: janeiro de
2022; P = plano de manejo (sem data).
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Municipali
ty
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Rheiformes
Rheidae
Rhea americana
(Linnaeus, 1758) SP(CR)
A,P
A,B
Tinamiformes
Tinamidae
Crypturellus undulatus
(Temminck, 1815) SP(VU)
A,P,2c,7j
A,B,5l
it
B
Crypturellus parvirostris
(Wagler, 1827)
7
4,7
A,B,2c
A,2c,7j
A,B,2
c
6,7
A,B,2
c
Crypturellus tataupa
(Temminck, 1815)
A,B,C
A
Rhynchotus rufescens
(Temminck, 1815)
3
4
A,B,2c
A,2c
A,2c
Nothura maculosa
(Temminck, 1815)
4
A,B,C,2c
A,2c
2c
Anseriformes
Anhimidae
Anhima cornuta
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3
B
4,7
B
A
A,B
Anatidae
Dendrocygna viduata
(Linnaeus, 1766)
4
B
P,2c
2lit
7
to be continued
continua

62
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Dendrocygna
autumnalis (Linnaeus,
1758)
3,7
B
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
Cairina moschata
(Linnaeus, 1758)
3,7
4,7
A,B
2c,7j
A,2c
7
2c
Sarkidiornis sylvicola
Ihering & Ihering,
1907 SP(VU)
B
2c
2c
Amazonetta
brasiliensis (Gmelin,
1789)
B
4,7
A,B,2c
2c
A,2c
2c
Nomonyx dominicus
(Linnaeus, 1766)
B
Oxyura vittata
(Philippi, 1860)
B
Galliformes
Cracidae
Penelope superciliaris
Temminck, 1815
B
Crax fasciolata Spix,
1825 SP(CR), IUCN (VU)
P,2c
A,B,5li
t
Podicipediformes
Podicipedidae
Tachybaptus
dominicus (Linnaeus,
1766)
B
2c
B
Podilymbus podiceps
(Linnaeus, 1758)
B
Columbiformes
Columbidae
Columba livia Gmelin,
1789
A,B
A
6
B
Patagioenas picazuro
(Temminck, 1813)
3,7
4,7
A,B,2c
A,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Patagioenas
cayennensis
(Bonnaterre, 1792)
7
7
B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
B,2c
Leptotila verreauxi
Bonaparte, 1855
7
4,7
A,B,2c
A,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
to be continued
continua

63
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Leptotila rufaxilla
(Richard & Bernard,
1792)
7
A,P,7s,7j
7
Zenaida auriculata
(Des Murs, 1847)
3,7
B
4
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s
A,B,2c
,7s
6,7
B,2c
Claravis pretiosa
(Ferrari-Perez, 1886)
2c,7j
Columbina minuta
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3
Columbina talpacoti
(Temminck, 1811)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
A,B
Columbina squammata
(Lesson, 1831)
3,7
4,7
A,B,2c
P,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
6,7
B,2c
Columbina picui
(Temminck, 1813)
7
Cuculiformes
Cuculidae
Guira guira (Gmelin,
1788)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s
A,2c
6
B,2c
Crotophaga ani
Linnaeus, 1758
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
2c
6,7
B,2c
Tapera naevia
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
4
B
2c,7j
A,B,2c
B,2c
Dromococcyx
pavoninus Pelzeln,
1870
B,C
7s
Coccycua minuta
(Vieillot, 1817)
B
Micrococcyx cinereus
(Vieillot, 1817)
2c
5lit
Piaya cayana
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c,2
m
6
A,B,2c
Coccyzus
melacoryphus Vieillot,
1817
7
B
A,2c,7j
Nyctibiiformes
Nyctibiidae
Nyctibius griseus
(Gmelin, 1789)
7
4
2c
7
B
Caprimulgiformes
Caprimulgidae
Antrostomus rufus
(Boddaert, 1783)
A,2c,7s
2c
Lurocalis
semitorquatus
(Gmelin, 1789)
A,2c,7s,7j
2c
Nyctidromus albicollis
(Gmelin, 1789)
7
4,7
B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
B,2c
7
B,2c
to be continued
continua

64
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Hydropsalis parvula
(Gould, 1837)
7
2c,7s
2c
B
Hydropsalis
maculicaudus
(Lawrence, 1862) SP(EN)
B
Hydropsalis torquata
(Gmelin, 1789)
B
2c
Podager nacunda
(Vieillot, 1817)
4
2c
2c
2c
A,B
Chordeiles minor
(Forster, 1771)
2c
2c
Apodiformes
Apodidae
Cypseloides fumigatus
(Streubel, 1848)
2c
Streptoprocne zonaris
(Shaw, 1796)
A,B
Chaetura meridionalis
Hellmayr, 1907
4,7
A,B
2c
Tachornis squamata
(Cassin, 1853)
B
A
B
Trochilidae
Florisuga fusca
(Vieillot, 1817)
B
1,2c
Phaethornis pretrei
(Lesson & Delattre,
1839)
7
4,7
B
2c,7s
2c
6,7
B,1,2c
Colibri serrirostris
(Vieillot, 1816)
B
Anthracothorax
nigricollis (Vieillot,
1817)
3
4
B
2c
2c
1,2c
Heliomaster
squamosus
(Temminck, 1823)
B
6
B,1,2c
Chlorostilbon lucidus
(Shaw, 1812)
3
4,7
A,B
A
6,7
A,B,1,
2c
Eupetomena macroura
(Gmelin, 1788)
3
B
7
A,B
2c
A
6,7
A,B,1,
2c
Aphantochroa
cirrochloris (Vieillot,
1818)
B
Chrysuronia versicolor
(Vieillot, 1818)
7
Chionomesa fimbriata
(Gmelin, 1788)
2c
B
Chionomesa lactea
(Lesson, 1832)
B
6,7
A,B,1,
2c
Hylocharis chrysura
(Shaw, 1812)
3,7
4,7
A,B,C
A,2c,7j
A
7
A,B,1,
2c
to be continued
continua

65
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Gruiformes
Aramidae
Aramus guaraúna
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
4
B
2c
A,2c
B
Rallidae
Porphyrio martinica
(Linnaeus, 1766)
B
4
B
A,2c
Rufirallus viridis
(Statius Muller, 1776)
2c
A,2c
A,B
Laterallus
melanophaius
(Vieillot, 1819)
4
2c
Laterallus xenopterus
Conover, 1934 SP(CR),
BR(EN), IUCN(VU)
6
Mustelirallus albicollis
(Vieillot, 1819)
7
4,7
A,B,C
2c,2m
A,2c
6
2c
Pardirallus nigricans
(Vieillot, 1819)
7
4,7
A,B,2c
2c
6
Amaurolimnas
concolor (Gosse,
1847)
A
Aramides cajaneus
(Statius Muller, 1776)
3,7
A,B
2c
6
2c
Gallinula galeata
(Lichtenstein, 1818)
4
B
Heliornithidae
Heliornis fulica
(Boddaert, 1783) SP(EN)
2c,5lit
Charadriiformes
Charadriidae
Pluvialis dominica
(Statius Muller, 1776)
2c
Vanellus chilensis
(Molina, 1782)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c,2
m
6
A,B,2c
Charadrius collaris
Vieillot, 1818
2m
Recurvirostridae
Himantopus melanurus
Vieillot, 1817
B
2c
2c
Scolopacidae
Bartramia longicauda
(Bechstein, 1812) SP(VU)
2c
Calidris melanotos
(Vieillot, 1819)
2c
Gallinago paraguaiae
(Vieillot, 1816)
4
A,B,2c
2c
2c
to be continued
continua

66
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Tringa solitaria
Wilson, 1813
B
2c
2c
A,B
Tringa flavipes
(Gmelin, 1789)
B
2c
Jacanidae
Jacana jacana
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
4
A,B,2c
2c,7j
A,2c
A,B,2c
Laridae
Rynchops niger
Linnaeus, 1758
2c
Phaetusa simplex
(Gmelin, 1789) SP(VU)
7j
A,2c
Ciconiiformes
Ciconiidae
Ciconia maguari
(Gmelin, 1789) SP(VU)
A
Jabiru mycteria
(Lichtenstein, 1819)
7
A,B,2c
,5lit
A,B
Mycteria americana
Linnaeus, 1758
B
B
A,B,2c
,5lit
B
Anhingidae
Anhinga anhinga
(Linnaeus, 1766)
A,2c
2c
Phalacrocoracidae
Nannopterum
brasilianum (Gmelin,
1789)
3
A,B
A,2c,7j
A,2c
B
Pelecaniformes
Ardeidae
Tigrisoma lineatum
(Boddaert, 1783)
4
B
2c
A,2c
B,2c
Botaurus pinnatus
(Wagler, 1829)
2c
Nycticorax nycticorax
(Linnaeus, 1758)
B
B,2c
B
Butorides striata
(Linnaeus, 1758)
3
4,7
B,2c
B,2c
B,2c
Bubulcus ibis
(Linnaeus, 1758)
3
B
7
A,B
2c
A
6
B
Ardea cocoi Linnaeus,
1766
3
4
B
A,2c
A,2c
B,2c
Ardea alba Linnaeus,
1758
3
A,B
P,2c,7j
A,2c
6
B,2c
Syrigma sibilatrix
(Temminck, 1824)
3
B
4,7
A,B
2c,7s
A
B
Egretta thula (Molina,
1782)
A,B
P,2c,7j
A,2c
to be continued
continua

67
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Threskiornithidae
Mesembrinibis
cayennensis (Gmelin,
1789)
3,7
4
A,B
B,2c
Phimosus infuscatus
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
4,7
A,B
B
Theristicus caudatus
(Boddaert, 1783)
A,B
2c,7s,7j
A
6,7
A,B
Platalea ajaja
Linnaeus, 1758
B
B,2c
Cathartiformes
Cathartidae
Sarcoramphus papa
(Linnaeus, 1758)
B
A,P,2c,5lit
B
Coragyps atratus
(Bechstein, 1793)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Cathartes aura
(Linnaeus, 1758)
3
7
B
6
A,B
Accipitriformes
Pandionidae
Pandion haliaetus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
B
7j
B
Accipitridae
Gampsonyx swainsonii
Vigors, 1825
B
A,B
6
A,B
Elanus leucurus
(Vieillot, 1818)
B
2c
6
B
Leptodon cayanensis
(Latham, 1790)
A,B
A,2c
Elanoides forficatus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
B
B
Busarellus nigricollis
(Latham, 1790)
B
Rostrhamus sociabilis
(Vieillot, 1817)
B
A,B
2c
A,2c
A,B
Ictinia plumbea
(Gmelin, 1788)
4,7
A,B
A
A,B
A,B,2c
Hieraspiza
superciliosa (Linnaeus,
1766)
3
Accipiter striatus
Vieillot, 1808
B,2c
Geranospiza
caerulescens (Vieillot,
1817)
7
B
2c
B
Heterospizias
meridionalis (Latham,
1790)
B
A,B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
to be continued
continua

68
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Urubitinga urubitinga
(Gmelin, 1788)
A,B
P
A,B
Urubitinga coronata
(Vieillot, 1817) SP(CR),
BR(EN), IUCN(EN)
A,B
Rupornis magnirostris
(Gmelin, 1788)
3,7
4,7
A,B
A,2c
A
6,7
A,B,2c
Geranoaetus
albicaudatus (Vieillot,
1816)
3
B
B
A,B
Buteo nitidus (Latham,
1790)
2c
B,5obs
Buteo brachyurus
Vieillot, 1816
4
A,B
A,B
Strigiformes
Tytonidae
Tyto furcata
(Temminck, 1827)
4
B
Strigidae
Megascops choliba
(Vieillot, 1817)
3,7
B
4
B
2c
7
A,B
Pulsatrix perspicillata
(Latham, 1790) SP(CR)
B
Pulsatrix
koeniswaldiana
(Bertoni & Bertoni,
1901) MA
B
Bubo virginianus
(Gmelin, 1788)
A,7j
B
B
Glaucidium
brasilianum (Gmelin,
1788)
7
A,2c,7s,7j
A
B
Athene cunicularia
(Molina, 1782)
3
B
4
A,B,2c
A,7s,7j
A
6
A,B,2c
Aegolius harrisii
(Cassin, 1849)
B
Asio clamator
(Vieillot, 1808)
B
Asio stygius (Wagler,
1832)
B
Trogoniformes
Trogonidae
Trogon surrucura
Vieillot, 1817
A,2c
Coraciiformes
Momotidae
Baryphthengus
ruficapillus (Vieillot,
1818) MA
4
A
to be continued
continua

69
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Momotus momota
(Linnaeus, 1766)
7
7
A,2c,7j
A
Alcedinidae
Megaceryle torquata
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
4
B
A,2c,7j
2c
B
Chloroceryle amazona
(Latham, 1790)
3
B
P,2c
A,2c
2c
Chloroceryle
americana (Gmelin,
1788)
4
B
A
B,2c
Galbuliformes
Galbulidae
Galbula ruficauda
Cuvier, 1816
7
B
4,7
B
A,B
6,7
A,B,2c
Bucconidae
Monasa nigrifrons
(Spix, 1824) SP(VU)
7
A,2c,2m,7j
A,B,2c
,5lit,7j
Malacoptila striata
(Spix, 1824) MA
B
Notharchus swainsoni
(Gray, 1846) MA
2c
B
Nystalus chacuru
(Vieillot, 1816)
3
4,7
A,B,2c
A,2c
2c
A,B
Piciformes
Ramphastidae
Ramphastos toco
Statius Muller, 1776
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
6
A,B,2c
Pteroglossus
castanotis Gould, 1834
SP(VU)
3,7
B
A,2c,7j
A,B
Picidae
Picumnus
albosquamatus
d'Orbigny, 1840
3,7
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Melanerpes candidus
(Otto, 1796)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,2c,7s
2c,7s
6,7
B,2c
Melanerpes flavifrons
(Vieillot, 1818) MA
A,2c,7s,7j
Veniliornis passerinus
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,C
A,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
,2m
6
A,B,2c
Campephilus
melanoleucos (Gmelin,
1788)
3
B
7
B
A,2c,7j
A,B,2
m,7j
7
A,B,2c
Dryocopus lineatus
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
B
4,7
B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6
B,2c
Celeus flavescens
(Gmelin, 1788)
B
2c
2c
Colaptes
melanochloros
(Gmelin, 1788)
3
B
4
A,B
A,2c,7s
A,2m
6
B,2c
to be continued
continua

70
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Colaptes campestres
(Vieillot, 1818)
3,7
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
B,2c
Cariamidae
Cariamiformes
Cariama cristata
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
B
Falconiformes
Falconidae
Herpetotheres
cachinnans (Linnaeus,
1758)
4
A,B
A,2c,7j
6
A,B,2c
Micrastur
semitorquatus
(Vieillot, 1817)
A
B
Caracara plancus
(Miller, 1777)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Milvago chimachima
(Vieillot, 1816)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c
2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Falco sparverius
Linnaeus, 1758
3
4
B
A,2c,7j
2c
6
B,2c
Falco femoralis
Temminck, 1822
7
A,B
2c
B,2c
Falco peregrinus
Tunstall, 1771
B,0,2lit
Psittaciformes
Psittacidae
Brotogeris chiriri
(Vieillot, 1818)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c,2
m
6,7
A,B,2c
Pionus maximiliani
(Kuhl, 1820)
4,7
P
Amazona aestiva
(Linnaeus, 1758)
3,7
B
7
A,2c,7s,7j
A,5lit
Amazona amazonica
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
7
A,2c,7s,7j
A,2c,5l
it
Forpus
xanthopterygius (Spix,
1824)
3,7
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7j
A
6,7
2c
Eupsittula aurea
(Gmelin, 1788)
7
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s
A,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Aratinga auricapillus
(Kuhl, 1820)
B
7
B
A,2c7s,7j
A,2c,5l
it
7
A,B
Primolius maracana
(Vieillot, 1816) SP(VU)
4
A,B
Ara ararauna
(Linnaeus, 1758) SP(VU)
3
A,B,7
A,P,7s
Ara chloropterus Gray,
1859 SP(VU)
P
Psittacara
leucophthalmus
(Statius Muller, 1776)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,2c,7s,7j
2c
6,7
B,2c
to be continued
continua

71
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Passeriformes
Thamnophilidae
Formicivora rufa
(Wied, 1831)
B
B
6,7
B,2c
Dysithamnus mentalis
(Temminck, 1823)
2c
Herpsilochmus
longirostris Pelzeln,
1868 CE
7
B
Herpsilochmus
atricapillus Pelzeln,
1868
7
4
B
2c
6
A,B,2c
Thamnophilus doliatus
(Linnaeus, 1764)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,C
A,2c
2c,2m
6
A,B,2c
Thamnophilus pelzelni
Hellmayr, 1924
7
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
A
6,7
A,B,2c
Thamnophilus
caerulescens Vieillot,
1816
A,B
Taraba major
(Vieillot, 1816)
7
B
4,7
A,B,C
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c,2
m
6
A,B,2c
Drymophila ferruginea
(Temminck, 1822) MA
B
Dendrocolaptidae
Dendrocolaptes
platyrostris Spix, 1825
B
A,2c,7j
A,2m
Lepidocolaptes
angustirostris
(Vieillot, 1818)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Xenopidae
Xenops rutilans
Temminck, 1821
B
2m
Furnariidae
Furnarius figulus
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
A
Furnarius rufus
(Gmelin, 1788)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s
A,2c
6
A,B,2c
Automolus
leucophthalmus (Wied,
1821) MA
2m
Phacellodomus
rufifrons (Wied, 1821)
7
Phacellodomus ruber
(Vieillot, 1817)
7
2c,7j
A,2c,2
m
Phacellodomus
ferrugineigula
(Pelzeln, 1858) MA
2c
Anumbius annumbi
(Vieillot, 1817)
A,P
6
to be continued
continua

72
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Cranioleuca vulpina
(Pelzeln, 1856)
B
2c
2c
6
B
Certhiaxis
cinnamomeus (Gmelin,
1788)
4
B
A,2c
B,2c,2
m
6
B,2c
Schoeniophylax
phryganophilus
(Vieillot, 1817)
3
B
Synallaxis scutata
Sclater, 1859 SP(EN)
2c
5lit
Synallaxis hypospodia
Sclater, 1874 SP(VU)
2c
B
Synallaxis spixi
Sclater, 1856
B
6
Synallaxis albescens
Temminck, 1823
B
4
B
A,2c,7s,7j
2c,2m,
7s,7j
6,7
B,2c
Synallaxis frontalis
Pelzeln, 1859
3,7
4
B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A
6,7
A,B,2c
Pipridae
Neopelma pallescens
(Lafresnaye, 1853)
B
A,B
Antilophia galeata
(Lichtenstein, 1823) CE
7
A,B
6,7
A,B
Manacus manacus
(Linnaeus, 1766)
B
Tityridae
Tityra inquisitor
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
7
B
A,2c
Tityra cayana
(Linnaeus, 1766)
4
A,2c
Pachyramphus viridis
(Vieillot, 1816)
B
Pachyramphus
castaneus (Jardine &
Selby, 1827)
A
Pachyramphus
polychopterus
(Vieillot, 1818)
A
2c,7j
7
Pachyramphus validus
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
7
4
B
A,P,2c
2c,2m
Rhynchocyclidae
Leptopogon
amaurocephalus
Tschudi, 1846
4
B
A,2c
B
6
2c
Corythopis delalandi
(Lesson, 1830)
B
A,B
Tolmomyias
sulphurescens (Spix,
1825)
A
B
7
A,B
Todirostrum cinereum
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c
A,2c
6,7
A,B
to be continued
continua

73
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Poecilotriccus
latirostris (Pelzeln,
1868)
7
4,7
A,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
A
Myiornis auricularis
(Vieillot, 1818) MA
4
2c
Hemitriccus
margaritaceiventer
(d'Orbigny &
Lafresnaye, 1837)
7
A,B,C
2c
2c
Tyrannidae
Hirundinea ferruginea
(Gmelin, 1788)
4
A,B
B
Euscarthmus
meloryphus Wied,
1831
A
7j
2c
Camptostoma
obsoletum (Temminck,
1824)
7
4,7
B
A,2c,7s
B,2c,7s
6,7
A,B,2c
Elaenia flavogaster
(Thunberg, 1822)
3,7
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c
2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Elaenia spectabilis
Pelzeln, 1868
7
B
2c
A,2c
A,B
Elaenia parvirostris
Pelzeln, 1868
B
Elaenia mesoleuca
(Deppe, 1830)
B
Elaenia cristata
Pelzeln, 1868
A
Suiriri suiriri (Vieillot,
1818)
2c
7
Myiopagis gaimardii
(d'Orbigny, 1839)
SP(EN)
2c
5lit
Myiopagis caniceps
(Swainson, 1835)
A,P,2c,7s,7j
2c
Myiopagis viridicata
(Vieillot, 1817)
P,2c,7j
A
2c
Legatus leucophaius
(Vieillot, 1818)
3
Myiarchus swainsoni
Cabanis & Heine, 1859
B
A,2c
A
Myiarchus ferox
(Gmelin, 1789)
7
4,7
A,B
2c,7s
A,2m
6,7
A,B,2c
Myiarchus tyrannulus
(Statius Muller, 1776)
7
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Sirystes sibilator
(Vieillot, 1818)
A
Casiornis rufus
(Vieillot, 1816)
A,2c,7s,7j
A
A,B,2c
,2m
to be continued
continua

74
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Capsiempis flaveola
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
2c
Phaeomyias murina
(Spix, 1825)
A
Serpophaga
subcristata (Vieillot,
1817)
A,B
2c
6,7
Pitangus sulphuratus
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,C
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
B,2c
Philohydor lictor
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
7
P
Machetornis rixosa
(Vieillot, 1819)
3
4,7
A,B
A
6
B,2c
Myiodynastes
maculatus (Statius
Muller, 1776)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
2c
7
B,2c
Megarynchus pitangua
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
A
6,7
A,B,2c
Myiozetetes cayanensis
(Linnaeus, 1766)
2c
A
Myiozetetes similis
(Spix, 1825)
7
4
B
A,2c
A,2c,2
m
6,7
A,B,2c
Tyrannus albogularis
Burmeister, 1856
7
A
B
2c
A,B
Tyrannus savana
Daudin, 1802
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7j
2c
7
A,B,2c
Griseotyrannus
aurantioatrocristatus
(d'Orbigny &
Lafresnaye, 1837)
B
2c
7
B
Empidonomus varius
(Vieillot, 1818)
3,7
4,7
A,B
2c
2c
7
A,B,2c
Colonia colonus
(Vieillot, 1818)
7
4
B
2c
6
B
Arundinicola
leucocephala
(Linnaeus, 1764)
3
4
B
A,2c,2
m
6
B
Fluvicola albiventer
(Spix, 1825)
2c
A,B,2c
Fluvicola nengeta
(Linnaeus, 1766)
B
B
7j
A
6
A,B
Pyrocephalus rubinus
(Boddaert, 1783)
3,7
B
B
6
Gubernetes yetapa
(Vieillot, 1818)
3
B
4,7
A,B,2c
2c
A,2c,2
m
6
B,2c
Myiophobus fasciatus
(Statius Muller, 1776)
B
2c,7s
A
6
Cnemotriccus fuscatus
(Wied, 1831)
7
4
B,C
A,2c,7s,7j
2c
7
A,2c
Lathrotriccus euleri
(Cabanis, 1868)
B
2c
Satrapa icterophrys
(Vieillot, 1818)
B
to be continued
continua

75
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Knipolegus
cyanirostris (Vieillot,
1818)
B
Xolmis velatus
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
3
B
4
A,B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
2c
6
B
Nengetus cinereus
(Vieillot, 1816)
B
A,P,2c
2c
6
B
Vireonidae
Cyclarhis gujanensis
(Gmelin, 1789)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
B,2c
Vireo chivi (Vieillot,
1817)
4
A,B
2c,7j
2c
B,2c
Corvidae
Cyanocorax
cristatellus
(Temminck, 1823) CE
4
B
6,7
B,2c
Cyanocorax chrysops
(Vieillot, 1818)
3
4
A,B,C
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Hirundinidae
Pygochelidon
cyanoleuca (Vieillot,
1817)
3,7
4,7
A,B
A,P
A
6,7
A,2c
Alopochelidon fucata
(Temminck, 1822)
A,B
Stelgidopteryx
ruficollis (Vieillot,
1817)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s
A,2c
6
B,2c
Progne tapera
(Linnaeus, 1766)
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c
A,2c,2
m
2c
Progne chalybea
(Gmelin, 1789)
7
A,B,2c
A,2c
A,B
7
B
Tachycineta albiventer
(Boddaert, 1783)
B
P,2c
A,2c
Tachycineta
leucorrhoa (Vieillot,
1817)
4,7
A,B,2c
A,2c
A,B,2c
6
B,2c
Riparia riparia
(Linnaeus, 1758)
3
2c
Hirundo rustica
Linnaeus, 1758
7
A,2c
2c
Petrochelidon
pyrrhonota (Vieillot,
1817)
A
Troglodytidae
Troglodytes musculus
Naumann, 1823
3,7
4,7
A,B,2c
2c
2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Cantorchilus leucotis
(Lafresnaye, 1845)
A,2c
2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Polioptilidae
Polioptila dumicola
(Vieillot, 1817)
3,7
B
B
A,P,2c
B,2c
A
to be continued
continua

76
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Donacobiidae
Donacobius atricapilla
(Swainson, 1831)
4,7
B,2c
2c
A,2c,2
m
A,B,2c
Turdidae
Turdus leucomelas
Vieillot, 1818
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Turdus rufiventris
Vieillot, 1818
B
A,P
2c
Turdus
amaurochalinus
Cabanis, 1850
4
A,B,2c
A,P,2c
A,B,2c
B,2c
Turdus subalaris
(Seebohm, 1887)
2c
Mimidae
Mimus saturninus
(Lichtenstein, 1823)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c
A,2c,2
m
6,7
A,B,2c
Estrildidae
Estrilda astrild
(Linnaeus, 1758)
B
Passeridae
Passer domesticus
(Linnaeus, 1758)
3
B
4
A,B
A,7j
A
6
B
Motacillidae
Anthus chii Vieillot,
1818
7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s
A,B,2c
,2m
6
B
Fringillidae
Cyanophonia
cyanocephala
(Vieillot, 1818)
B
Euphonia chlorotica
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s
A,2m
6,7
A,B,2c
Euphonia violacea
(Linnaeus, 1758)
B
Ammodramus
humeralis (Bosc,
1792)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,B,2c
6,7
B,2c
Arremon flavirostris
Swainson, 1838
4
A,B
A,B,2c
Arremon polionotus
Bonaparte, 1850
B,C
Zonotrichia capensis
(Statius Muller, 1776)
4,7
A,B,2c
P
6,7
A,B,2c
Leistes superciliaris
(Bonaparte, 1850)
3,7
4
A,B,2c
A,P
A,2c
6
B
Cacicus haemorrhous
(Linnaeus, 1766)
7
B
A,P,2c
A,2m
Icterus jamacaii
(Gmelin, 1788)
B
Icterus pyrrhopterus
(Vieillot, 1819)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7j
A,2m
6
A,B,2c
to be continued
continua

77
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Molothrus
rufoaxillaris Cassin,
1866
4
2c
A,2c,7s
2c
Molothrus oryzivorus
(Gmelin, 1788)
2c
5lit
Molothrus bonariensis
(Gmelin, 1789)
3
4,7
A,B,2c
P,2c
A,2c,2
m
2c
Amblyramphus
holosericeus (Scopoli,
1786)
4
A,B,2c
Gnorimopsar chopi
(Vieillot, 1819)
4
2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6
Icteridae
Agelasticus
atroolivaceus (Wied-
Neuwied, 1831)
B
2c
2c,2m
Chrysomus ruficapillus
(Vieillot, 1819)
4,7
B
B,2c
B,2c
Pseudoleistes
guirahuro (Vieillot,
1819)
3
B
4,7
A,B,2c
2c
2m
6,7
A,B,2c
Parulidae
Geothlypis
aequinoctialis
(Gmelin, 1789)
B
2c,7j
2c
7
A,B,2c
Setophaga pitiayumi
(Vieillot, 1817)
A,P,2c
Myiothlypis leucophrys
(Pelzeln, 1868) SP(EN) |
CE
6
2m
Myiothlypis flaveola
Baird, 1865
7
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Basileuterus
culicivorus (Deppe,
1830)
A,B,C
A,2c
5m
6
A,B,2c
Cardinalidae
Piranga flava
(Vieillot, 1822)
B
Habia rubica (Vieillot,
1817)
3
Cyanoloxia
glaucocaerulea
(d'Orbigny &
Lafresnaye, 1837)
B
Thraupidae
Nemosia pileata
(Boddaert, 1783)
3,7
B
7
A,B
A,P,2c
6,7
B,2c
Coryphaspiza
melanotis (Temminck,
1822) SP(RE), BR(VU),
IUCN(VU)
2m,5lit
,5
to be continued
continua

78
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Emberizoides
herbicola (Vieillot,
1817)
3,7
4
A,B
2c
6
2m
Hemithraupis guira
(Linnaeus, 1766)
B
A,2c,7s,7j
Tersina viridis (Illiger,
1811)
3,7
4,7
A,B
6
A,B,2c
Dacnis cayana
(Linnaeus, 1766)
A,B
2c
6
A,B,2c
Saltatricula atricollis
(Vieillot, 1817) CE
B
6,7
B
Saltator similis
d'Orbigny &
Lafresnaye, 1837
4
2c
2c
2c
Coereba flaveola
(Linnaeus, 1758)
A,B
B
Volatinia jacarina
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Eucometis penicillata
(Spix, 1825)
A,2c,7s,7j
Coryphospingus
cucullatus (Statius
Muller, 1776)
B
4,7
A,B
A,2c,7s,7j
6,7
A,B,2c
Tachyphonus rufus
(Boddaert, 1783)
2c
Ramphocelus carbo
(Pallas, 1764)
4
A,B
2c
2m
6
A,B,2c
,2m
Sporophila lineola
(Linnaeus, 1758)
4,7
B
6,7
B
Sporophila collaris
(Boddaert, 1783)
B
4
B
2c
A,2c,2
m
Sporophila nigricollis
(Vieillot, 1823)
2c
Sporophila ardesiaca
(Dubois, 1894)
4
Sporophila
caerulescens (Vieillot,
1823)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7j
2c
6,7
A,2c
Sporophila leucoptera
(Vieillot, 1817)
3
B
B
2c
7
Sporophila bouvreuil
(Statius Muller, 1776)
SP(VU)
2c
2c,5lit
Sporophila hypoxantha
Cabanis, 1851 SP(CR),
BR(VU)
B
Sporophila
melanogaster (Pelzeln,
1870) SP(CR), BR(VU)
B
Sporophila angolensis
(Linnaeus, 1766)
A,B
to be continued
continua

79
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Continuation – Appendix 1
Continuação – Apêndice 1
Taxa
Andradina
Marília
Paulo de Faria
São Simão
Biological
Reserve
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Ecological
Station
Munici
pality
Thlypopsis sordida
(d'Orbigny &
Lafresnaye, 1837)
B
Cypsnagra
hirundinacea (Lesson,
1831) SP(EN)
B
Conirostrum
speciosum (Temminck,
1824)
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s
A
6
A,B,2c
Sicalis citrina Pelzeln,
1870
A,B
Sicalis flaveola
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3
B
4,7
A,B
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2m
6,7
A,B
Sicalis luteola
(Sparrman, 1789)
B
A,B
A,7j
6
Pipraeidea
melanonota (Vieillot,
1819)
B
Rauenia bonariensis
(Gmelin, 1789)
B
Cissopis leverianus
(Gmelin, 1788)
2c
Paroaria capitata
(d'Orbigny &
Lafresnaye, 1837)
B
Thraupis sayaca
(Linnaeus, 1766)
3,7
B
4,7
A,B,2c
A,P,2c,7s,7j
A,2c
6,7
A,B,2c
Thraupis palmarum
(Wied, 1821)
B
A
B
Stilpnia cayana
(Linnaeus, 1766)
B
4,7
A,B
2c
A,2c
6,7
A,B,2c

80
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
Appendix 2. Frequency in Lists Indexes (IFL) for bird species recorded in four Protected Areas in interior São Paulo
state, southeastern Brazil.
Apêndice 2. Índices de Frequência em Listas (IFL) para espécies de aves registradas em quatro Unidades de
Conservação no interior do estado de São Paulo, sudeste do Brasil.
Locality
Species
IFL
REBIO Andradina
Crypturellus parvirostris (Wagler, 1827)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Dendrocygna autumnalis (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Cairina moschata (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Patagioenas picazuro (Temminck, 1813)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Patagioenas cayennensis (Bonnaterre, 1792)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Leptotila verreauxi Bonaparte, 1855
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Leptotila rufaxilla (Richard & Bernard, 1792)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Zenaida auriculata (Des Murs, 1847)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Columbina talpacoti (Temminck, 1811)
0.423
REBIO Andradina
Columbina squammata (Lesson, 1831)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Guira guira (Gmelin, 1788)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Crotophaga ani Linnaeus, 1758
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Tapera naevia (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Piaya cayana (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Nyctibius griseus (Gmelin, 1789)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Nyctidromus albicollis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Hydropsalis parvula (Gould, 1837)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Phaethornis pretrei (Lesson & Delattre, 1839)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Chrysuronia versicolor (Vieillot, 1818)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Hylocharis chrysura (Shaw, 1812)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Aramus guarauna (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Mustelirallus albicollis (Vieillot, 1819)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Pardirallus nigricans (Vieillot, 1819)
0.269
REBIO Andradina
Aramides cajaneus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Vanellus chilensis (Molina, 1782)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Jacana jacana (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Jabiru mycteria (Lichtenstein, 1819)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Mesembrinibis cayennensis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Coragyps atratus (Bechstein, 1793)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Geranospiza caerulescens (Vieillot, 1817)
0.192
REBIO Andradina
Rupornis magnirostris (Gmelin, 1788)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Megascops choliba (Vieillot, 1817)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Glaucidium brasilianum (Gmelin, 1788)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Momotus momota (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Megaceryle torquata (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
to be continued
continua

81
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
REBIO Andradina
Galbula ruficauda Cuvier, 1816
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Monasa nigrifrons (Spix, 1824)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Ramphastos toco Statius Muller, 1776
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Pteroglossus castanotis Gould, 1834
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Picumnus albosquamatus d'Orbigny, 1840
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Melanerpes candidus (Otto, 1796)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Veniliornis passerinus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Dryocopus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Colaptes campestris (Vieillot, 1818)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Cariama cristata (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Caracara plancus (Miller, 1777)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Milvago chimachima (Vieillot, 1816)
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Falco femoralis Temminck, 1822
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Brotogeris chiriri (Vieillot, 1818)
0.308
REBIO Andradina
Amazona aestiva (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Amazona amazonica (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Forpus xanthopterygius (Spix, 1824)
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Eupsittula aurea (Gmelin, 1788)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Ara ararauna (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Psittacara leucophthalmus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Herpsilochmus atricapillus Pelzeln, 1868
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Thamnophilus doliatus (Linnaeus, 1764)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Thamnophilus pelzelni Hellmayr, 1924
0.231
REBIO Andradina
Taraba major (Vieillot, 1816)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Lepidocolaptes angustirostris (Vieillot, 1818)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Furnarius rufus (Gmelin, 1788)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Phacellodomus ruber (Vieillot, 1817)
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Synallaxis frontalis Pelzeln, 1859
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Antilophia galeata (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Pachyramphus validus (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Todirostrum cinereum (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Poecilotriccus latirostris (Pelzeln, 1868)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Hemitriccus margaritaceiventer (d'Orbigny &
Lafresnaye, 1837)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Camptostoma obsoletum (Temminck, 1824)
0.038
to be continued
continua

82
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
REBIO Andradina
Elaenia flavogaster (Thunberg, 1822)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Elaenia spectabilis Pelzeln, 1868
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Myiarchus ferox (Gmelin, 1789)
0.269
REBIO Andradina
Myiarchus tyrannulus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Pitangus sulphuratus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Machetornis rixosa (Vieillot, 1819)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Myiodynastes maculatus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Megarynchus pitangua (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.231
REBIO Andradina
Myiozetetes similis (Spix, 1825)
0.308
REBIO Andradina
Tyrannus albogularis Burmeister, 1856
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Tyrannus melancholicus Vieillot, 1819
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Tyrannus savana Daudin, 1802
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Empidonomus varius (Vieillot, 1818)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Colonia colonus (Vieillot, 1818)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Pyrocephalus rubinus (Boddaert, 1783)
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Cnemotriccus fuscatus (Wied, 1831)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Cyclarhis gujanensis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Pygochelidon cyanoleuca (Vieillot, 1817)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Stelgidopteryx ruficollis (Vieillot, 1817)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Troglodytes musculus Naumann, 1823
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Polioptila dumicola (Vieillot, 1817)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Turdus leucomelas Vieillot, 1818
0.192
REBIO Andradina
Mimus saturninus (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Anthus chii Vieillot, 1818
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Euphonia chlorotica (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Ammodramus humeralis (Bosc, 1792)
0.077
REBIO Andradina
Leistes superciliaris (Bonaparte, 1850)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Icterus pyrrhopterus (Vieillot, 1819)
0.308
REBIO Andradina
Myiothlypis flaveola Baird, 1865
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Nemosia pileata (Boddaert, 1783)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Emberizoides herbicola (Vieillot, 1817)
0.038
REBIO Andradina
Tersina viridis (Illiger, 1811)
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Volatinia jacarina (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.115
REBIO Andradina
Sporophila caerulescens (Vieillot, 1823)
0.154
REBIO Andradina
Thraupis sayaca (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.038
to be continued
continua

83
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Marília
Crypturellus parvirostris (Wagler, 1827)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Anhima cornuta (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Cairina moschata (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Amazonetta brasiliensis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.7
EEc de Marília
Patagioenas picazuro (Temminck, 1813)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Patagioenas cayennensis (Bonnaterre, 1792)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Leptotila verreauxi Bonaparte, 1855
1.6
EEc de Marília
Columbina talpacoti (Temminck, 1811)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Columbina squammata (Lesson, 1831)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Columbina picui (Temminck, 1813)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Guira guira (Gmelin, 1788)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Crotophaga ani Linnaeus, 1758
0.2
EEc de Marília
Piaya cayana (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Coccyzus melacoryphus Vieillot, 1817
0.2
EEc de Marília
Nyctidromus albicollis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Chaetura meridionalis Hellmayr, 1907
0.1
EEc de Marília
Phaethornis pretrei (Lesson & Delattre, 1839)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Chlorostilbon lucidus (Shaw, 1812)
0.3
EEc de Marília
Eupetomena macroura (Gmelin, 1788)
0.3
EEc de Marília
Hylocharis chrysura (Shaw, 1812)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Mustelirallus albicollis (Vieillot, 1819)
0.3
EEc de Marília
Pardirallus nigricans (Vieillot, 1819)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Vanellus chilensis (Molina, 1782)
0.6
EEc de Marília
Butorides striata (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.9
EEc de Marília
Bubulcus ibis (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Syrigma sibilatrix (Temminck, 1824)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Phimosus infuscatus (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Coragyps atratus (Bechstein, 1793)
0.6
EEc de Marília
Cathartes aura (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Ictinia plumbea (Gmelin, 1788)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Rupornis magnirostris (Gmelin, 1788)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Momotus momota (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Galbula ruficauda Cuvier, 1816
0.3
EEc de Marília
Nystalus chacuru (Vieillot, 1816)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Ramphastos toco Statius Muller, 1776
0.5
to be continued
continua

84
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Marília
Picumnus albosquamatus d'Orbigny, 1840
0.6
EEc de Marília
Melanerpes candidus (Otto, 1796)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Veniliornis passerinus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Campephilus melanoleucos (Gmelin, 1788)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Dryocopus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Colaptes campestris (Vieillot, 1818)
0.6
EEc de Marília
Cariama cristata (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Caracara plancus (Miller, 1777)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Milvago chimachima (Vieillot, 1816)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Brotogeris chiriri (Vieillot, 1818)
0.7
EEc de Marília
Pionus maximiliani (Kuhl, 1820)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Amazona aestiva (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Amazona amazonica (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Forpus xanthopterygius (Spix, 1824)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Eupsittula aurea (Gmelin, 1788)
0.3
EEc de Marília
Aratinga auricapillus (Kuhl, 1820)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Psittacara leucophthalmus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Thamnophilus doliatus (Linnaeus, 1764)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Thamnophilus pelzelni Hellmayr, 1924
0.1
EEc de Marília
Taraba major (Vieillot, 1816)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Lepidocolaptes angustirostris (Vieillot, 1818)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Furnarius rufus (Gmelin, 1788)
0.3
EEc de Marília
Tityra inquisitor (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Todirostrum cinereum (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Poecilotriccus latirostris (Pelzeln, 1868)
0.7
EEc de Marília
Camptostoma obsoletum (Temminck, 1824)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Elaenia flavogaster (Thunberg, 1822)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Myiarchus ferox (Gmelin, 1789)
0.3
EEc de Marília
Myiarchus tyrannulus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Pitangus sulphuratus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Machetornis rixosa (Vieillot, 1819)
0.8
EEc de Marília
Myiodynastes maculatus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Megarynchus pitangua (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Tyrannus melancholicus Vieillot, 1819
0.3
EEc de Marília
Tyrannus savana Daudin, 1802
0.3
to be continued
continua

85
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Marília
Empidonomus varius (Vieillot, 1818)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Gubernetes yetapa (Vieillot, 1818)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Cyclarhis gujanensis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Pygochelidon cyanoleuca (Vieillot, 1817)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Stelgidopteryx ruficollis (Vieillot, 1817)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Progne tapera (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.3
EEc de Marília
Progne chalybea (Gmelin, 1789)
1.1
EEc de Marília
Tachycineta leucorrhoa (Vieillot, 1817)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Hirundo rustica Linnaeus, 1758
0.1
EEc de Marília
Troglodytes musculus Naumann, 1823
0.4
EEc de Marília
Donacobius atricapilla (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.6
EEc de Marília
Turdus leucomelas Vieillot, 1818
0.6
EEc de Marília
Mimus saturninus (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.8
EEc de Marília
Euphonia chlorotica (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Ammodramus humeralis (Bosc, 1792)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Zonotrichia capensis (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.3
EEc de Marília
Cacicus haemorrhous (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Icterus pyrrhopterus (Vieillot, 1819)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Molothrus bonariensis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.1
EEc de Marília
Chrysomus ruficapillus (Vieillot, 1819)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Pseudoleistes guirahuro (Vieillot, 1819)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Myiothlypis flaveola Baird, 1865
0.5
EEc de Marília
Nemosia pileata (Boddaert, 1783)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Tersina viridis (Illiger, 1811)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Volatinia jacarina (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Coryphospingus cucullatus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Sporophila lineola (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Sporophila caerulescens (Vieillot, 1823)
0.2
EEc de Marília
Conirostrum speciosum (Temminck, 1824)
0.5
EEc de Marília
Sicalis flaveola (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.4
EEc de Marília
Thraupis sayaca (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.8
EEc de Marília
Stilpnia cayana (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.3
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Crypturellus undulatus (Temminck, 1815)
0.412
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Crypturellus parvirostris (Wagler, 1827)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Dendrocygna autumnalis (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.353
to be continued
continua

86
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Cairina moschata (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Patagioenas picazuro (Temminck, 1813)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Patagioenas cayennensis (Bonnaterre, 1792)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Leptotila verreauxi Bonaparte, 1855
0.353
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Leptotila rufaxilla (Richard & Bernard, 1792)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Zenaida auriculata (Des Murs, 1847)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Claravis pretiosa (Ferrari-Perez, 1886)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Columbina talpacoti (Temminck, 1811)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Columbina squammata (Lesson, 1831)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Guira guira (Gmelin, 1788)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Crotophaga ani Linnaeus, 1758
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Tapera naevia (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.353
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Dromococcyx pavoninus Pelzeln, 1870
0.294
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Piaya cayana (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Coccyzus melacoryphus Vieillot, 1817
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Antrostomus rufus (Boddaert, 1783)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Lurocalis semitorquatus (Gmelin, 1789)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Nyctidromus albicollis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Hydropsalis parvula (Gould, 1837)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Phaethornis pretrei (Lesson & Delattre, 1839)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Hylocharis chrysura (Shaw, 1812)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Vanellus chilensis (Molina, 1782)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Jacana jacana (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Phaetusa simplex (Gmelin, 1789)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Nannopterum brasilianum (Gmelin, 1789)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Ardea alba Linnaeus, 1758
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Syrigma sibilatrix (Temminck, 1824)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Egretta thula (Molina, 1782)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Theristicus caudatus (Boddaert, 1783)
0.412
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Coragyps atratus (Bechstein, 1793)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Pandion haliaetus (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.882
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Heterospizias meridionalis (Latham, 1790)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Bubo virginianus (Gmelin, 1788)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Glaucidium brasilianum (Gmelin, 1788)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Athene cunicularia (Molina, 1782)
0.118
to be continued
continua

87
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Momotus momota (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Megaceryle torquata (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Monasa nigrifrons (Spix, 1824)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Ramphastos toco Statius Muller, 1776
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Pteroglossus castanotis Gould, 1834
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Picumnus albosquamatus d'Orbigny, 1840
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Melanerpes candidus (Otto, 1796)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Melanerpes flavifrons (Vieillot, 1818)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Veniliornis passerinus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.294
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Campephilus melanoleucos (Gmelin, 1788)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Dryocopus lineatus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Colaptes melanochloros (Gmelin, 1788)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Colaptes campestris (Vieillot, 1818)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Cariama cristata (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Herpetotheres cachinnans (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.294
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Caracara plancus (Miller, 1777)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Falco sparverius Linnaeus, 1758
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Brotogeris chiriri (Vieillot, 1818)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Amazona aestiva (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Amazona amazonica (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.941
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Forpus xanthopterygius (Spix, 1824)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Eupsittula aurea (Gmelin, 1788)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Aratinga auricapillus (Kuhl, 1820)
0.353
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Ara ararauna (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Psittacara leucophthalmus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.412
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Thamnophilus pelzelni Hellmayr, 1924
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Taraba major (Vieillot, 1816)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Dendrocolaptes platyrostris Spix, 1825
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Lepidocolaptes angustirostris (Vieillot, 1818)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Furnarius rufus (Gmelin, 1788)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Phacellodomus ruber (Vieillot, 1817)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Synallaxis albescens Temminck, 1823
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Synallaxis frontalis Pelzeln, 1859
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Pachyramphus polychopterus (Vieillot, 1818)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Poecilotriccus latirostris (Pelzeln, 1868)
0.176
to be continued
continua

88
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Camptostoma obsoletum (Temminck, 1824)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Myiopagis caniceps (Swainson, 1835)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Myiopagis viridicata (Vieillot, 1817)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Myiarchus ferox (Gmelin, 1789)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Myiarchus tyrannulus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Casiornis rufus (Vieillot, 1816)
0.647
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Pitangus sulphuratus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Myiodynastes maculatus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Megarynchus pitangua (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Tyrannus melancholicus Vieillot, 1819
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Tyrannus savana Daudin, 1802
0.353
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Fluvicola nengeta (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.353
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Myiophobus fasciatus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Cnemotriccus fuscatus (Wied, 1831)
0.941
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Xolmis velatus (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Cyclarhis gujanensis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Vireo chivi (Vieillot, 1817)
0.353
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Cyanocorax chrysops (Vieillot, 1818)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Stelgidopteryx ruficollis (Vieillot, 1817)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Turdus leucomelas Vieillot, 1818
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Anthus chii Vieillot, 1818
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Euphonia chlorotica (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.588
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Ammodramus humeralis (Bosc, 1792)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Icterus pyrrhopterus (Vieillot, 1819)
0.235
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Molothrus rufoaxillaris Cassin, 1866
0.353
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Gnorimopsar chopi (Vieillot, 1819)
0.412
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Geothlypis aequinoctialis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.353
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Myiothlypis flaveola Baird, 1865
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Hemithraupis guira (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Volatinia jacarina (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Eucometis penicillata (Spix, 1825)
0.059
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Coryphospingus cucullatus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Sporophila caerulescens (Vieillot, 1823)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Conirostrum speciosum (Temminck, 1824)
0.059
to be continued
continua

89
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Sicalis flaveola (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.176
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Sicalis luteola (Sparrman, 1789)
0.118
EEc de Paulo de Faria
Thraupis sayaca (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.059
EEc de Santa Maria
Crypturellus parvirostris (Wagler, 1827)
0.333
EEc de Santa Maria
Dendrocygna viduata (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Cairina moschata (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Patagioenas picazuro (Temminck, 1813)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Patagioenas cayennensis (Bonnaterre, 1792)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Leptotila verreauxi Bonaparte, 1855
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Leptotila rufaxilla (Richard & Bernard, 1792)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Zenaida auriculata (Des Murs, 1847)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Columbina talpacoti (Temminck, 1811)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Columbina squammata (Lesson, 1831)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Crotophaga ani Linnaeus, 1758
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Nyctibius griseus (Gmelin, 1789)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Nyctidromus albicollis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Phaethornis pretrei (Lesson & Delattre, 1839)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Chlorostilbon lucidus (Shaw, 1812)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Eupetomena macroura (Gmelin, 1788)
0.556
EEc de Santa Maria
Chionomesa lactea (Lesson, 1832)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Hylocharis chrysura (Shaw, 1812)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Theristicus caudatus (Boddaert, 1783)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Coragyps atratus (Bechstein, 1793)
0.444
EEc de Santa Maria
Heterospizias meridionalis (Latham, 1790)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Rupornis magnirostris (Gmelin, 1788)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Megascops choliba (Vieillot, 1817)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Galbula ruficauda Cuvier, 1816
0.667
EEc de Santa Maria
Picumnus albosquamatus d'Orbigny, 1840
0.333
EEc de Santa Maria
Melanerpes candidus (Otto, 1796)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Campephilus melanoleucos (Gmelin, 1788)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Colaptes campestris (Vieillot, 1818)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Cariama cristata (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Caracara plancus (Miller, 1777)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Milvago chimachima (Vieillot, 1816)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Brotogeris chiriri (Vieillot, 1818)
0.111
to be continued
continua

90
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Santa Maria
Forpus xanthopterygius (Spix, 1824)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Eupsittula aurea (Gmelin, 1788)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Aratinga auricapillus (Kuhl, 1820)
0.333
EEc de Santa Maria
Psittacara leucophthalmus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Formicivora rufa (Wied, 1831)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Herpsilochmus longirostris Pelzeln, 1868
0.333
EEc de Santa Maria
Thamnophilus pelzelni Hellmayr, 1924
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Lepidocolaptes angustirostris (Vieillot, 1818)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Phacellodomus rufifrons (Wied, 1821)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Synallaxis albescens Temminck, 1823
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Synallaxis frontalis Pelzeln, 1859
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Antilophia galeata (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Pachyramphus polychopterus (Vieillot, 1818)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Tolmomyias sulphurescens (Spix, 1825)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Todirostrum cinereum (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.333
EEc de Santa Maria
Camptostoma obsoletum (Temminck, 1824)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Elaenia flavogaster (Thunberg, 1822)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Suiriri suiriri (Vieillot, 1818)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Serpophaga subcristata (Vieillot, 1817)
0.444
EEc de Santa Maria
Myiarchus ferox (Gmelin, 1789)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Myiarchus tyrannulus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Pitangus sulphuratus (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Myiodynastes maculatus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Megarynchus pitangua (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.444
EEc de Santa Maria
Myiozetetes similis (Spix, 1825)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Tyrannus melancholicus Vieillot, 1819
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Tyrannus savana Daudin, 1802
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Griseotyrannus aurantioatrocristatus (d'Orbigny &
Lafresnaye, 1837)
0.333
EEc de Santa Maria
Empidonomus varius (Vieillot, 1818)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Cnemotriccus fuscatus (Wied, 1831)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Cyclarhis gujanensis (Gmelin, 1789)
1.444
EEc de Santa Maria
Cyanocorax cristatellus (Temminck, 1823)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Cyanocorax chrysops (Vieillot, 1818)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Pygochelidon cyanoleuca (Vieillot, 1817)
0.222
to be continued
continua

91
CAVARZERE, V.; COSTA, T.V.; SCHUNCK, F. Birds from four protected areas in inland São Paulo State
Rev. Inst. Flor. v. 35 n. 1 p. 45-91 jun. 2023
continuation Apendix 2
continuação Apêndice 2
Locality
Species
IFL
EEc de Santa Maria
Progne chalybea (Gmelin, 1789)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Troglodytes musculus Naumann, 1823
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Cantorchilus leucotis (Lafresnaye, 1845)
0.333
EEc de Santa Maria
Turdus leucomelas Vieillot, 1818
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Mimus saturninus (Lichtenstein, 1823)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Euphonia chlorotica (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Ammodramus humeralis (Bosc, 1792)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Zonotrichia capensis (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Pseudoleistes guirahuro (Vieillot, 1819)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Geothlypis aequinoctialis (Gmelin, 1789)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Myiothlypis flaveola Baird, 1865
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Nemosia pileata (Boddaert, 1783)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Saltatricula atricollis (Vieillot, 1817)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Volatinia jacarina (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.111
EEc de Santa Maria
Coryphospingus cucullatus (Statius Muller, 1776)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Sporophila lineola (Linnaeus, 1758)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Sporophila caerulescens (Vieillot, 1823)
0.556
EEc de Santa Maria
Sporophila leucoptera (Vieillot, 1817)
0.222
EEc de Santa Maria
Sicalis flaveola (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.444
EEc de Santa Maria
Thraupis sayaca (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.667
EEc de Santa Maria
Stilpnia cayana (Linnaeus, 1766)
0.667