ArticlePublisher preview available

Personality traits, democratic support, and authoritarian nostalgia

Wiley
Social Science Quarterly
Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract and Figures

Objective Why do democratic voters feel nostalgia for an authoritarian past? This article introduces a dispositional framework for authoritarian nostalgia, showing that in addition to situational factors, an enduring source of sentimental longing for the authoritarian past may very well be rooted in a person's core psychological structure. Methods I use mixed‐methods approach with data collection from South Korea and Taiwan. Using linear regression models with interaction terms, I analyze the contingent effects of personality traits on authoritarian nostalgia. Results I find that people high in emotional stability are likely to be nostalgic and that the trait's effects are greater than those from other traits traditionally associated with authoritarian ideology. Results from the interaction model show that these impacts are more pronounced with weak and moderate democrats but not with strong democrats. Conclusion People high in emotional stability are nostalgic due to their longing for the proven socioeconomic performance of the past. In addition, the democratic values of individual citizens can constrict how personality shapes voters’ view of former dictatorships.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Received: 1 February 2023 Revised: 1 May 2023 Accepted: 19 May 2023
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13286
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Personality traits, democratic support, and
authoritarian nostalgia
Sanghoon Kim-Leffingwell
Center for Advanced Governmental Studies, Johns
Hopkins University, Washington, District of
Columbia, USA
Correspondence
Sanghoon Kim-Leffingwell Senior Lecturer, Center
for Advanced Governmental Studies, Johns Hopkins
University, Washington, DC, USA.
Email: skl@jhu.edu
Abstract
Objective: Why do democratic voters feel nostalgia for an
authoritarian past? This article introduces a dispositional frame-
work for authoritarian nostalgia, showing that in addition to
situational factors, an enduring source of sentimental longing for
the authoritarian past may very well be rooted in a person’s core
psychological structure.
Methods: I use mixed-methods approach with data collection
from South Korea and Taiwan. Using linear regression mod-
els with interaction terms, I analyze the contingent effects of
personality traits on authoritarian nostalgia.
Results: I find that people high in emotional stability are likely
to be nostalgic and that the trait’s effects are greater than those
from other traits traditionally associated with authoritarian ideol-
ogy. Results from the interaction model show that these impacts
are more pronounced with weak and moderate democrats but
not with strong democrats.
Conclusion: People high in emotional stability are nostalgic due
to their longing for the proven socioeconomic performance of
the past. In addition, the democratic values of individual citi-
zens can constrict how personality shapes voters’ view of former
dictatorships.
KEYWORDS
authoritarian nostalgia, big-five framework, personality traits, postauthoritarian
democracies
More than three decades have passed since the third wave of democratization at the end of the 20th
century. While the statues and statutes of former dictators have long since been destroyed, democratic
frustration and authoritarian nostalgia have met with a rise in support for authoritarian alternatives in many
new democracies, and nostalgic rhetoric has functioned as a rallying cry in many democratic elections.
Authoritarian successors have returned to power in Eastern Europe and Latin America, and in East and
Southeast Asia, exemplified by Park Geun-hye in South Korea and Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in the Philippines,
among others. This lingering political legacy of former dictatorships begs the following questions: Why do
voters feel nostalgic for former dictatorships and their leaders? And why do some people feel this nostalgia
more strongly or more often than others?
Social Science Quarterly. 2023;104:619–635. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ssqu © 2023 by the Southwestern Social Science Association. 619
... While the paper does contain statistical inference 8 , it limits itself to demographic variables such as education, age, and ethnicity, and none of the potentially salient variables familiar in the literature, such as psychological orientation on politics and government, individual personality traits, and even emotions. 9 In this paper, we leverage the result of the 2022 Philippine presidential election to articulate potential avenues of research on the ongoing critical debates of the Marcos family revival in contemporary Philippine politics. We outline and develop analytical perspectives and key areas of focus that do not seek to supplant existing theoretical frameworks but rather to enrich and supplement them. ...
Article
The electoral victory of Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., son and namesake of the ousted Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr., has sparked significant debate among academics and commentators. This outcome underscores the need to refine prevailing analytical frameworks, particularly within the broader context of authoritarian resurgence in fragile democracies. This paper critically evaluates existing perspectives on Marcos Jr.’s victory, including arguments centered on historical revisionism, social media disinformation, and the “Duterte effect,” and advances supplemental theoretical approaches. We argue that the Marcos family’s political comeback illustrates the persistent influence of latent authoritarian values among citizens in post-authoritarian democracies. In addition, we identify three key potential determinants of authoritarian resurgence: (1) pro-dictator bias, (2) risk-aversion and preference for continuity, and (3) the role of multiple memory systems in shaping electoral behavior. By proposing these analytical perspectives and key areas of focus, this study aims to offer a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics of Philippine politics and democratization, while contributing to the broader discourse on contemporary challenges facing post-authoritarian democracies worldwide, marked by authoritarian nostalgia and democratic decline.
... Authoritarian nostalgia can generate group sentiment among voters who share the core values from former authoritarian political rhetoric, such as economic prosperity, political stability, and social membership (Kim-Leffingwell, 2023;Choi, 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Legacies of an authoritarian past have enduring effects on voters’ attitudes and behaviors. I argue that authoritarian nostalgia is an important source of group sentiment and voter behavior in post-authoritarian democracies. Voters with nostalgic sentiment construct strong group sentiment based on historical perception and express attachment towards authoritarian successors. I test this argument with a new measure of authoritarian nostalgia. With original data collected from South Korea and Taiwan, I provide evidence that nostalgic voters are likely to exhibit strong group sentiment observable through partisan attachment. Abstracting from the specific cases, I use a randomly assigned candidate comparison analysis to demonstrate that voters high in authoritarian nostalgia are more attracted to hypothetical candidates invoking nostalgia than those with high programmatic or ideological proximity. Overall, the results show how authoritarian nostalgia remains important as a source of group sentiment in maturing democracies.
... Authoritarian personality is frequently used to describe personality traits of the individual that are biased in favor of social obedience, authority-worship, and dependence on the group (Ma 2022). Numerous studies have demonstrated that individuals with authoritarian personalities exhibit a rigid, binary worldview; struggle with ambiguity and complexity; are highly sensitive to perceived threats; and demonstrate stronger animosity toward outgroups that diverge from their views (Jost, Federico, and Napier 2009;Jost et al. 2018;Sanghoon 2023). Individuals with an authoritarian personality are more inclined to disregard conflicting facts in favor of ideas aligning with their views, particularly in perceived high-security risk situations. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Scholarship has now recognized the potentially detrimental effects of social media on political knowledge, but the question as to whether political knowledge and susceptibility to misinformation are related remains open. Furthermore, there are not many cross‐national comparison studies. This study compares the general and differential factors of the mechanisms of misinformation formation in social media between China and the United States from the perspectives of media factors and psychological factors. Methods Using the 2020 Netizen Social Awareness Survey, we analyze the relationships between social media, personality traits, cognitive closure, and misinformation in China and the United States. Results The study shows that social media such as Microblog and Twitter do not mislead news consumers. Personality traits and motivational factors have a significant impact on people's misinformation. Authoritarian personality is a general psychological factor affecting public misinformation. Moreover, under different media systems in China and the United States, the impact of social media on misinformation varies with the degree of cognitive closure. Conclusion It is evident that in the era of social media, cultivating rational and knowledgeable democratic citizens cannot focus solely on the role of the media. It must also consider the cultural and psychological characteristics of the national population.
Article
Full-text available
Recent studies suggest that young individuals living in consolidated democracies are growing increasingly disillusioned with liberal democratic institutions and becoming more receptive to alternative forms of governance. This study investigates the democratic orientations of young individuals by examining support for different forms of leadership in South Korea. It argues that some young Koreans are following the global trend and are increasingly showing less faith in democracy. Specifically, they are showing more support for strongman leaders due to the way in which these leaders appeal to these voters. An original survey with an embedded experiment suggests that, while the general Korean public tends to support democratic leaders, young Koreans increasingly express a greater preference for strongman leaders due to their growing public anxieties and societal grievances along with the leaders’ painted image to resolve problems. These findings empirically challenge the long-held belief that young people inherently and undoubtedly prefer democracy and suggest that more needs to be done to overcome their diminishing faith in democratic leadership. The study thus prompts a reconsideration of how generational value changes may influence democracies in the future.
Article
Comparative politics scholars have long noted the presence of authoritarian nostalgia in emerging democracies. In this paper, we explore how the combination of nostalgia and authoritarianism influenced public attitudes within the U.S. context. Specifically, we use a module from the Cooperative Election Study to explore the relationship between nostalgia and four measures of authoritarian attitudes. Our findings show that nostalgia has the expected relationship in all four models. Nostalgic Americans are more likely to support political strongmen, violations of rules, norms, and institutions, and the use of political violence against political opponents. This paper contributes to the literature on authoritarian nostalgia by establishing a link between nostalgia and authoritarianism in an established democracy without a recent authoritarian past.
Article
Throughout the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump promised to voters that, if elected, he would “make America great again.” Trump’s explicitly nostalgic appeal was rooted in the collective perception, shared by at least some voters, that life was better (and simpler) in the past. Nostalgic appeals have a long history in American politics. Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) slogan was co-opted from Reagan’s “let’s make America great again.” Despite their long history, we suspect that, as nostalgic appeals have become central to the Republican Party’s messaging, nostalgia-susceptible voters have sorted into the Republican Party. Recently, scholars have attempted to better understand the political consequences of nostalgia on voting for populist parties, both in general and specifically for Donald Trump. We make three contributions to the literature. First, using an open-ended prompt, we consider more carefully what people mean when they say they long for the “good old days.” Second, we use these open-ended responses to inform our measurement of nostalgia and whether it reflects a longing for the past or pessimism about the future. In doing so, we show the importance of religiosity and media consumption (i.e., Fox News) as predictors of individual-level nostalgia. Third, we connect our measure of nostalgia to vote choice during the 2022 midterm election—demonstrating that the effects are broader than support for Donald Trump. Overall, we contend that if one is to fully understand contemporary politics, one needs to know how nostalgia influences political attitudes and behaviors.
Article
Purpose During the pandemic, restaurants closed due to restrictions and economic instabilities. This research paper aims to investigate the motivational effect of nostalgia induced by fear of missing out (FOMO) upon the e-WOM about the dining place. Did FOMO evoke nostalgic memories and emotional symptoms with the dining place? It further inspected if the diners trust the restaurant for these nostalgic memories and their emotional connect. Design/methodology/approach A survey-based questionnaire was applied to collect data. A two-step method for analyzing the measurement and structural model was applied by using the principles of SEM to analyze the associations among key constructs in the proposed model. Findings Psychological constructs like nostalgia and personality drove the diners’ behavior of trust and e-WOM. The findings also confirmed the mediation effect of brand nostalgia, brand personality and brand trust between FOMO and e-WOM. Further, the model has elucidated the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) and usage gratification theories. Originality/value This paper has contributed to the branding literature by examining how brand constructs have mediated the path between FOMO and e-WOM. Multiple serial mediation effect among the key variables has been a novel contribution of this study. The ELM and the usage gratification theory have been integrated to extend the theoretical underpinnings in the hospitality sector.
Article
Full-text available
Traditional research on political parties pays little attention to the temporal focus of communication. It usually concentrates on promises, issue attention, and policy positions. This lack of scholarly attention is surprising, given that voters respond to nostalgic rhetoric and may even adjust issue positions when policy is framed in nostalgic terms. This article presents a novel dataset, PolNos, which contains six text-based measures of nostalgic rhetoric in 1,648 party manifestos across 24 European democracies from 1946 to 2018. The measures combine dictionaries, word embeddings, sentiment approaches, and supervised machine learning. Our analysis yields a consistent result: nostalgia is most prevalent in manifestos of culturally conservative parties, notably Christian democratic, nationalist, and radical right parties. However, substantial variation remains regarding regional differences and whether nostalgia concerns the economy or culture. We discuss the implications and use of our dataset for studying political parties, party competition, and elections.
Article
Full-text available
This study explores how authoritarian distributive policies may not only generate political support for the autocrat but may also help sustain powerful and lasting authoritarian legacies. We use microlevel data from South Korea's New Village Movement, a 1970s rural development program implemented under dictator Park Chung‐hee and widely touted as contributing to the country's rapid economic development. Our analysis shows that townships in receipt of larger cash transfers cast more votes for Park's incumbent party in the subsequent election. More importantly, we show that the effects of the subsidies still appeared almost four decades later in 2012, when the dictator's daughter was democratically elected as the president of South Korea. We show that these effects were not driven by villagers’ long‐term income gains or enhanced social capital due to the program but by the unwavering support of the beneficiary villagers for the dictator, whose legacy remained strong long after democratization.
Article
Full-text available
Objective The purpose of this article is to investigate the associations between submissive authoritarianism, multiculturalism, and perceived economic threat. More specifically, it explores whether the effects of multiculturalism on authoritarianism are moderated by perceived economic anxieties. Methods An original data set was collected using the online platform Qualtrics, which consisted of a stratified sample of 1010 complete responses from a German non‐probability sample in January 2019. Results In simple additive models, multiculturalist attitudes show a statistically significant depressing effect on authoritarianism, while economic threat significantly increases it. However, when multiculturalist attitudes are interacted with perceived economic threats, the depressing effect of multiculturalism on authoritarianism wanes. While low levels of economic threat demonstrate a statistically significant depressing effect of multiculturalism on authoritarianism, at higher levels of economic threat, this effect wanes and becomes statistically insignificant. Conclusion This article shows that turning away from inclusionary policies may lead not only to a withering of multiculturalism but also to an increased tendency to succumb to authoritarian temptations, particularly in a climate of rising economic anxieties.
Article
Full-text available
Populist movements typically endorse a pessimistic view that blames the “elites” for societal problems. Why is this populist worldview so appealing to many citizens? We propose that populism is associated with nostalgia: A bittersweet feeling defined as a sentimental longing for a better past. We tested this idea in three preregistered studies. Study 1 revealed that both personal and collective nostalgia (i.e., referring to either personal memories, or a shared national history) were associated with populist attitudes. Moreover, the nostalgia measures mediated a link between collective angst and populist attitudes. Studies 2 and 3, then, were experiments designed to investigate the causal order between nostalgia and populist attitudes. In Study 2, a manipulation of nostalgia could not establish a causal effect on populist attitudes; however, a measure of nostalgia was again correlated with populist attitudes. In Study 3, we tested the reverse causal order by exposing participants to either a populist or pluralist speech. Results revealed that exposure to the populist speech increased both personal and collective nostalgia. In all studies, these effects emerged independent of political orientation. Apparently, feelings of nostalgia are closely associated with populist attitudes, and may help explain why citizens find a populist worldview appealing.
Article
Full-text available
Through the case of the New Right movement in South Korea in the early 2000s, this article explores how history has become a battleground on which the Right tried to regain its political legitimacy in the postauthoritarian context. Analyzing disputes over historiography in recent decades, this article argues that conservative intellectuals—academics, journalists, and writers—play a pivotal role in constructing conservative historical narratives and building an identity for right-wing movements. By contesting what they viewed as “distorted” leftist views and promoting national pride, New Right intellectuals positioned themselves as the guardians of “liberal democracy” in the Republic of Korea. Existing studies of the Far Right pay little attention to intellectual circles and their engagement in civil society. By examining how right-wing intellectuals appropriated the past and shaped triumphalist national imagery, this study aims to better understand the dynamics of ideational contestation and knowledge production in Far Right activism.
Article
Full-text available
This article scrutinizes the relationship between collective nostalgia and populism. Different populist figures utilize nostalgia by referring to their country's 'good old' glorious days and exploiting resentment of the elites and establishment. Populists instrumentalize nostalgia in order to create their populist heartland, which is a retrospectively constructed utopia based on an abandoned but undead past. Using two original datasets from Turkey, this study first analyzes whether collective nostalgia characterizes populist attitudes of the electorate. The results illustrate that collective nostalgia has a significantly positive relationship with populist attitudes even after controlling for various independent variables, including religiosity, partisan-ship, satisfaction with life and Euroscepticism. Secondly, the study tests whether nostalgic messages affect populist attitudes using an online survey experiment. The results indicate that Ottoman nostalgia helps increase populist attitudes. Kemalist nostalgia, however, has a weak direct effect on populist attitudes that disappears after controlling for party preference.
Article
Full-text available
Scholars and commentators have argued that national nostalgia forms a germane element of the rhetoric of populist radical right parties (PRRP). We addressed the national nostalgia component of PRRP ideology with respect to voters. Relying on political science theorizing and social psychological evidence, we proposed that national nostalgia forms a new emotion-based explanation for PRRP support within the cultural grievance framework. National nostalgia reflects grievances over perceived loss of the ethnically and culturally homogeneous moral community. Such grievances are subsequently mobilized by PRRP to justify and increase the persuasiveness of their nativist ideology. We hypothesized that voters who experience higher national nostalgia would evince stronger support for PRRP, due to national nostalgia’s association with endorsement of PRRP’s nativist ideology (i.e., ethnic nationhood, anti-Muslim attitudes). We tested this hypothesis by surveying a representative sample of native majority members in The Netherlands (N = 1934). The results were consistent with the hypothesis, highlighting the relevance of national nostalgia for understanding PRRP success.
Chapter
Full-text available
This volume both reflects and exemplifies the recent resurgence of interest in the social and psychological characteristics and processes that give rise to ideological forms. Ideology is an elusive, multifaceted construct that can usefully be analyzed in terms of “top-down” processes related to the social construction and dissemination of ideology, as well as to “bottom-up” processes, including dispositional and situational factors, that make certain ideological outcomes more likely than others. The twenty chapters of this volume focus on the cognitive and motivational antecedents and consequences of adopting specific ideologies, the functions served by those ideologies, and the myriad ways in which people accept and justify (versus reject) aspects of the social and political worlds they inhabit. Current challenges and future directions for the study of ideology and system justification are also discussed in several chapters. The volume represents a wide variety of research traditions bearing on the social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. These traditions include (a) the study of attitudes, social cognition, and information processing at both conscious and nonconscious levels of awareness, (b) theories of motivated reasoning and goal-directed cognition, (c) research on personality and dispositional correlates of political orientation, (d) work on social justice and the origins of moral values, (e) the myriad ways in which social and political opinions are shaped by local situations and environments, and (f) studies of stereotyping, prejudice, and the ideological correlates of intergroup attitudes.
Article
Full-text available
Objective This article examines to what extent the image that individuals have about past authoritarian regimes affects citizens’ support for contemporary democracies. Methods Drawing on the 2010 Latinobarómetro survey, we test whether the “deviation in evaluations” (i.e., the difference between the individuals’ evaluation of the present country economic situation and the individuals’ evaluation of the last authoritarian regime) affect support for democracy in Latin America. Results We found that as the assessment of the last authoritarian government outperforms that of the present country economy, individuals are less likely to support democracy, and this effect is stronger for old people. Conclusion This finding reveals important challenges for democratic consolidation: emerging democracies do not only have to display a good economic performance by themselves, but they also must prove to be better than previous authoritarian regimes.
Article
How does an authoritarian past shape voters’ left-right orientation? Recent studies investigate “anti-dictator bias” in political ideology, where citizens in a former right-wing (left-wing) dictatorship may display a leftist (rightist) bias in their ideological self-identification. In this paper, I provide evidence for a “pro-dictator bias” where citizens hold ideological positions close to those of the dictator, depending on their experiences prior to transition. In countries with high economic growth under dictatorship and without violent ruling party ouster, authoritarian successors could continue mobilizing the popular base and invoke positive sentiment on the past in democratic elections. Such positive sentiment can facilitate individual ideological orientation close to the ideological label of the former dictatorship. I test this hypothesis by combining individual- and country-level data covering 1985 to 2018 from 48 countries. I demonstrate that voters in countries with high economic growth during dictatorship and without violent party exit are more likely to have pro-dictator bias in ideology. I further show that voters in former developmental states show pro-dictator bias from the history of economic growth and more peaceful transition. The findings emphasize the role of pre-transition features in shaping alternative legacies on voter attitudes in post-authoritarian societies.
Article
How can leaders recover public trust and approval when government performance is low? We argue politicians use speeches evoking images of deceased predecessors to reactivate support temporarily. This distracts supporters from the poor performance and arouses empathy and nostalgia among them, causing them to perceive the current leader more favorably. We test this argument by scraping for all speeches by Argentine president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. We identify all instances when she referenced Juan Perón—the charismatic founder of the Justice Party. We find that as Kirchner’s approval rating decreases, the number of Perón references increases. To identify the causal mechanism and to ensure that endogeneity is not a concern, we employ text analysis and a natural experiment—courtesy of LAPOP. The results provide robust evidence that leaders reference their dead predecessors to evoke positive feelings. However, while doing so can improve public opinion, the effects manifest only in the short term and among supporters.