ArticlePublisher preview available

Conformity to Masculine Norms, the Dark Tetrad, and Men’s Rape Myth Acceptance

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This study extended research on men’s rape myth acceptance (RMA) by examining the relative contributions of conformity to masculine norms and the Dark Tetrad of personality to RMA in 301 predominantly White and heterosexual men in the United States. Results of hierarchical regressions revealed that conformity to masculine norms and the Dark Tetrad each accounted for incremental variance (i.e., beyond the other variable set) in men’s RMA, with conformity to power over women and heterosexual self-presentation norms and psychopathy emerging as unique and positive predictors. Results of post hoc mediation analyses indicated that psychopathy’s relation to RMA was partially to fully mediated through conformity to the power over women norm. Results of correlations supported hypothesized associations of conformity to power over women and violence norms with psychopathy and sadism, conformity to the risk-taking norm with psychopathy, and conformity to the playboy norm with three of the four Dark Tetrad traits.
Conformity to Masculine Norms, the Dark Tetrad, and
Mens Rape Myth Acceptance
David M. Tokar
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Central State University
This study extended research on mens rape myth acceptance (RMA) by examining the relative contribu-
tions of conformity to masculine norms and the Dark Tetrad of personality to RMA in 301 predominantly
White and heterosexual men in the United States. Results of hierarchical regressions revealed that
conformity to masculine norms and the Dark Tetrad each accounted for incremental variance (i.e., beyond
the other variable set) in mens RMA, with conformity to power over women and heterosexual self-
presentation norms and psychopathy emerging as unique and positive predictors. Results of post hoc
mediation analyses indicated that psychopathys relation to RMA was partially to fully mediated through
conformity to the power over women norm. Results of correlations supported hypothesized associations of
conformity to power over women and violence norms with psychopathy and sadism, conformity to the risk-
taking norm with psychopathy, and conformity to the playboy norm with three of the four Dark Tetrad traits.
Public Signicance Statement
Mens rape myth acceptance has been linked to attitudinal and behavioral indicators of sexual
aggression; therefore, it is important to identify factors that may underlie mens endorsement of
rape myths. The present study demonstrated that men who conformed more to masculine norms
especially desiring power over women and disdaining gay menand possessed higher levels of
psychopathy were more likely to endorse rape myths.
Keywords: rape myth acceptance, conformity to masculine norms, Dark Tetrad, psychopathy
Prevalence data from a recent National Intimate Partner and
Sexual Violence Survey indicate that almost one in ve (19.1%)
U.S. women has experienced attempted or completed rape during
their lifetime, and more than one in three (36.3%) experienced some
form of contact sexual violence (i.e., rape, being made to penetrate
someone else, sexual coercion, and/or unwanted sexual contact) at
some point in their lives (Smith et al., 2017). Given that over 90% of
the perpetrators of rape and other forms of contact sexual violence
against women are male (Smith et al., 2017), it is important to
understand factors that may underlie mens likelihood to commit
sexual violence against women. One such risk factor is mens rape
myth acceptance (RMA).
Burt (1980) dened rape myths as prejudicial, stereotyped, or
false beliefs about rape, rape victims, and rapists(p. 217).
Although they are generally false, rape myths are believed to be
widely held cultural beliefs that serve to deny and justify male
sexual aggression against women(Lonsway & Fitzgerald, 1994,
p. 134) and blame women victims. Examples of rape myths include
beliefs that women mean yeswhen they say no,rape is often the
womans fault, and women enjoy being raped. Importantly, mens
endorsement of rape myths has been signicantly and positively
associated with attitudinal and behavioral indicators of sexual
aggression against women, including acceptance of interpersonal
violence (Payne et al., 1999), adversarial sexual beliefs (Payne et al.,
1999), attraction to sexual aggression (Malamuth, 1989), sexual
assault perpetration (see Yapp & Quayle, 2018, for a review), and
rape proclivity and likelihood of raping (OConnor, 2021;Seabrook
et al., 2018). Given the consistent associations of rape myth adher-
ence with different indicators of sexual aggression against women,
researchers have examined sociocultural and dispositional factors
that may underlie mens endorsement of rape myths. Two of those
factorsone sociocultural and the other dispositionalare confor-
mity to masculine norms and the Dark Triad/Tetrad of personality,
respectively.
Conformity to Masculine Norms and MensRMA
Conformity to masculine norms refers to the degree to which
individuals endorse personally enacting the requirements of mascu-
line norms(Levant et al., 2020, p. 623). Examples of traditional
masculine norms in hegemonic U.S. culture include winning (drive
to win), emotional control (restriction of emotional expression),
power over women (desire to dominate women in ones life),
playboy (desire for multiple and/or uncommitted sexual partners),
and heterosexual self-presentation (aversion to being perceived as
gay; Parent & Moradi, 2009). For decades, theorists have posited that
adherence to traditional masculine (and feminine) norms (e.g., men
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
This article was published Online First May 25, 2023.
The author has no known conicts of interest to declare. The ideas and data
appearing in this article have not been previously disseminated.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to DavidM.
Tokar, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Central State
University, 1400 Brush Row Road, Wilberforce, OH 45384, United
States. Email: dtokar@centralstate.edu
Psychology of Men & Masculinities © 2023 American Psychological Association
2023, Vol. 24, No. 3, 237247 ISSN: 1524-9220 https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000435
237
... It is also important to highlight that the playboy norm is associated with other sexually maladaptive behaviors. Specifically, stronger endorsement of the playboy norm has been linked to sexually aggressive behavior (Locke & Mahalik, 2005) as well as greater acceptance of certain rape myths (Tokar, 2023). Therefore, identifying the extent to which men endorse the playboy norm, and ultimately encouraging men to consider the role that ideology plays in their lives, may serve to inoculate them against engaging in a variety of maladaptive sexual behaviors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Men experiencing stress related to masculinity seem to be at greater risk for contracting a sexually transmitted infection. This relationship may be due to the precarious nature of masculinity and degree to which men adhere to traditional masculine norms. The present study investigated the impact of threatening masculinity and the moderating role of the playboy masculine norm on delay and probability discounting of condom-protected sex. A final sample of 784 U.S. men (Mage = 37.5; 72% White; 83% heterosexual) completed the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory, presented as a personality test. Participants were randomly assigned to receive false feedback about their personality designed to lead them to believe they were more feminine (i.e., threat; n = 393) or somewhat more masculine (i.e., affirmed; n = 391) than other men. Subsequently, participants completed two behavioral discounting tasks, which assessed their willingness to wait a period of time for a condom (i.e., delay discounting) and engage in sex without a condom despite a specified risk of contracting a sexually transmitted infection (i.e., probability discounting). Threatened men were more likely to forgo condom use on the probability discounting task, but not on the delay discounting task. Additionally, greater adherence to the playboy norm was associated with a lower likelihood of using a condom on both tasks. However, the playboy norm did not moderate the effects of masculinity threat. Men who face a threat to their masculinity, as well as those who conform to the playboy ideology, may be more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior.
Article
During hookups some people use coercive tactics to obtain sex from a reluctant partner. The current study explored whether individuals with greater conformity to traditional masculine ideologies (TMIs) are more willing to use coercive and coaxing tactics following sexual rejection than are individuals with less conformity to TMIs. German-speaking participants (N = 771; 50.5% men and 49.5% women; age M = 27.98, SD = 8.04), recruited through Prolific or university-wide mailing lists, were randomly assigned to read one of two hypothetical scenarios depicting a hookup leading to sexual rejection. One scenario included rejection when trying to initiate sexual activity. In the other scenario, rejection followed after some consensual sexual activity had taken place. Participants reported their propensity to use coercive and coaxing tactics. Results showed significant associations between conformity to TMIs and an increased propensity to use coercion and coaxing tactics. Additionally, sexual rejection after sexual activities leads to an increased propensity to use coaxing tactics. During hookups, men and women with greater conformity to TMIs related to sexual interactions, power dynamics and the endorsement of aggressive behaviors may perceive sexual rejection as a loss of control and try to regain dominance and power by using coercive and coaxing tactics.
Article
Full-text available
We tested a model describing the characteristics of sexually aggressive men that may also be useful for understanding the causes of other antisocial acts against women. This model hypothesizes that sexual aggressors can be identified by two sets of characteristics, labeled hostile masculinity and impersonal sex. To test this model, we followed up a sample of men 10 years after first studying them when they were young adults. We sought to predict which men would be in distressed relationships with women, be aggressive sexually, be nonsexually aggressive, or some combination of these. These behaviors were measured not only by questioning the men themselves but also by questioning many of the men's female partners. Some couples' videotaped conversations were also analyzed. The data supported the ability of the model to predict behavior 10 years later. We also developed the model further and identified the common and unique characteristics contributing to sexual aggression as compared with the other conflictual behaviors studied. The data supported the usefulness of hierarchical modeling incorporating both general factors that contribute to various interpersonal conflicts as well as specific factors uniquely pertaining to dominance of women.
Article
Full-text available
Structural equation modeling was used to study the characteristics of college men (N = 2,652) who aggressed against women either sexually, nonsexually, or both. According to the model, hostile childhood experiences affect involvement in delinquency, leading to aggression through two paths: (a) hostile attitudes and personality, which result in coerciveness both in sexual and nonsexual interactions, and (b) sexual promiscuity, which, especially in interaction with hostility, produces sexual aggression. In addition, sexual and nonsexual coercion were hypothesized to share a common underlying factor. Although its development was guided by integrating previous theory and research, the initial model was refined in half of the sample and later replicated in the second half. Overall, it fitted the data very well in both halves and in a separate replication with a sample for whom data were available about sexual but not about nonsexual aggression.
Article
Full-text available
The Dark Tetrad is a cluster of four “dark” personality traits which are socially aversive, with distinct conceptual roots, but which are intercorrelated: narcissism, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and sadism. Narcissism is associated with an inflated self-esteem and feelings of grandiosity; psychopathy involves a reduced empathy and a lack of remorse or guilt; Machiavellianism is characterized by a tendency for manipulation for own personal benefit; sadism involves feelings of pleasure with the pain or suffering of others. Sexism is the group of beliefs linked with the perceived superiority of men over women. Previous studies have found relationships between the Dark Tetrad and the tolerance to the use of sexual violence, and between the former and sexism. Furthermore, sexism has been linked with the acceptance of sexual violence. This study aims to revise the literature exploring the link between each of the components of the Dark Tetrad and the legitimation of the use of sexual violence; it also aims to present the associations that have been found between the aforementioned variables and sexism, and related concepts, in multiple studies. Based on the previous literature, suggestions for aims of future research in this field (i.e., Dark Tetrad, sexual violence, sexism) are made, more specifically exploring the relative effect of each of the components of the Dark Tetrad in the explanation of the legitimation of sexual violence, as well as exploring a possible, at least partial, mediation of sexism in the link between each of the “dark” traits and the acceptance of sexual violence.
Article
Full-text available
When multiple hypothesis tests are conducted, the familywise Type I error probability correspondingly increases. Various multiple test procedures (MTPs) have been developed, which generally aim to control the familywise Type I error rate at the desired level. However, although multiplicity is frequently discussed in the ANOVA literature and MTPs are correspondingly employed, the issue has received considerably little attention in the regression literature and it is rare to see MTPs employed empirically. The present aims are three-fold. First, within the eclectic uses of multiple regression, specific situations are delineated wherein adjusting for multiplicity may be most relevant. Second, the performance of ten MTPs amenable to regression is investigated via familywise Type I error control, statistical power, and, where appropriate, false discovery rate, simultaneous confidence interval coverage and width. Although methodologists may anticipate general patterns, the focus is on the magnitude of error inflation and the size of the differences among methods under plausible scenarios. Third, perspectives from across the scientific literature are discussed, which shed light on contextual factors to consider when evaluating whether multiplicity adjustment is advantageous. Results indicated that multiple testing can be problematic, even in nonextreme situations where multiplicity consequences may not be immediately expected. Results pointed toward several effective, balanced, MTPs, particularly those that accommodate correlated parameters. Importantly, the goal is not to universally recommend MTPs for all regression models, but. rather to identify a set of circumstances wherein multiplicity is most relevant, evaluate MTPs, and integrate diverse perspectives that suggest multiplicity adjustment or alternate solutions.
Article
Full-text available
The perpetration of rape and sexual assault on college campuses is a pervasive problem that has been linked to narcissism and rape myth acceptance. Studies evaluating empathy priming-based prevention programs have yielded mixed results, and empathy priming has not been examined specifically among high-risk populations. The present study sought to address this gap in the literature by exploring how empathy priming interacts with narcissistic traits to predict heterosexual college males’ (n = 74) rape myth acceptance. Participants read a vignette depicting a date rape and were either primed to be empathetic or objective. Results showed that baseline empathy and narcissism were negatively and positively associated with rape myth acceptance, respectively. After priming, participants low on narcissistic traits had lower rape myth acceptance when they were in the empathy (vs. the objective) condition, whereas individuals high in narcissistic traits had higher rape myth acceptance when they were in the empathy priming condition. Findings suggest that males who were at higher risk of perpetration more strongly endorsed problematic beliefs about rape after being asked to empathize with a fictional rape victim. Future prevention and intervention studies should incorporate measures of personality traits and continue to explore the possibility that empathy priming may produce the opposite of the intended effect among high-risk males.
Article
Full-text available
Despite advances in the psychological study of masculinities, the term “masculinity” or “masculinities” has been conceptualized differently across diverse theoretical approaches. To address these challenges, this article seeks to integrate the myriad ways that masculinities have been studied by scholars. Drawing on scholarship from various fields, the authors delineate fived domains of masculinities—self-ascribed, other-ascribed, situational, performative, and macro masculinities. Reflecting an integration of these five domains, masculinities are conceived as the constellation of cultural and individual meanings attached to men and boys that are (a) attributed to the self as well as to (b) people, concepts, and objects; (c) embedded in situational cues; (d) performed as social practices; and (e) distributed through ecological influences. The authors propose a framework that pieces together these domains of masculinities, describes how they differ in their stability and proximity of influence on people’s lives, and explicates their linkages with each other. Finally, the authors explain how the framework and the five domains can guide future psychological research and practice.
Article
Full-text available
Both rape myth acceptance (RMA) and rape proclivity are associated with acts of sexual aggression. Although this relationship is assumed to be unidirectional with RMA contributing to rape proclivity, no studies have examined the possibility of a predictive relationship, with rape proclivity also impacting RMA. This is important to consider in a longitudinal context, as both constructs may increase risk of sexual assault perpetration and support each other over time, further escalating the risk of a sexual assault. Using longitudinal data with a sample of 488 college men, this study used cross-lagged panel analysis to investigate these relationships across 4 time points according to 2 models: autoregressive effects of RMA and rape proclivity, meaning each construct predicts itself over time, and RMA and rape proclivity predicting each other over time. The results of this study indicate that causality exists for RMA and rape proclivity. These findings have implications for prevention efforts directed toward modifying attitudes associated with sexual assault perpetration—particularly for men who are at high risk of perpetrating sexual assault, including those with high rates of RMA and rape proclivity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Full-text available
Although previous research has shown a positive association between traditional male gender role endorsement and rape myth acceptance, few studies have examined the factors that underlie the positive association between distinct masculine norms and rape myth acceptance. Given the prominence of sexual assault on college campuses and how rape myth acceptance helps perpetuate sexual assault perpetration, this study sought to further examine what may underlie the association between masculine norm conformity and rape myth acceptance. One gender-relevant factor may be nurturance or the extent to which men endorse qualities such as caring and tenderness. The current study examined (a) the extent to which conformity to distinct masculine norms and nurturance were associated with rape myth acceptance and (b) if nurturance mediated the associations between conformity to masculine norms and rape myth acceptance among 251 college-attending men. Results revealed that conformity to the masculine norms of power over women and disdaining gay men were positively associated with rape myth acceptance. Nurturance partially mediated the associations between the power over women and disdaining gay men norm and rape myth acceptance, such that men higher in those two masculine norms reported lower nurturance, which was associated with greater rape myth acceptance. Our findings emphasize the importance of examining how conformity to distinct masculine norms, especially norms that center on misogyny and devaluing women and femininity, may contribute to increased rape myth acceptance. Our findings also suggest that increasing nurturance may help to prevent men’s perpetuation of rape myth acceptance.
Article
The acceptance of rape myths persists at varying levels across societies, which creates a hostile environment in which rape is justified and victims are blamed for being assaulted. This study investigated experience and familiarity with sexual assault, the Dark Triad traits, and gender-based beliefs benevolent and hostile sexism, and masculine honor beliefs as predictors of rape myth acceptance in a Lebanese sample consisting of 311 participants (177 women). Men scored significantly higher than women in rape myth acceptance, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, hostile sexism, and masculine honor beliefs. Participants who were victims of sexual assault or knew someone who had been assaulted in the past scored significantly lower on rape myth acceptance than those who did not. In addition, familiarity with sexual assault moderated the relationship between psychopathy and both benevolent sexism and masculine honor beliefs. Results from Structural Equation Modeling demonstrated that both hostile sexism and masculine honor beliefs mediated the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and rape myth acceptance. These findings emphasize the role of specific personality traits, subjective experience and beliefs in shaping rape-enabling attitudes; such a model can be used as the foundation of rape prevention programs in the future.