ArticlePDF Available

Knowledge Regarding Oral Anticoagulant Therapy among Patient with Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement: A Cross-Sectional Study in

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Objectives: To determine the knowledge of mechanical heart valve replacement patients regarding oral anticoagulants. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study on patients with mechanical valve prostheses was conducted at Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The duration of the study was 6 months. Overall, 345 participants were included in the study. Consecutive sampling technique has been used. Information was collected using adopted, validated questionnaire. Results: Overall, 345 patients with mechanical valve prostheses were included in the study with mean age of the participants were 37.91 years. The age of the participants were ranging from 19 to 62 years. Male patients (59%) exceeded female patients (41%). Only 10% study patients received education regarding oral anticoagulant therapy. Majority (78.3%) patients had inadequate overall knowledge score regarding oral anticoagulants (Warfarin) while 16.5% had moderate adequate knowledge and 5.2% had adequate knowledge score. Conclusion: The majority of studied patients had inadequate overall knowledge regarding oral anticoagulant (Warfarin). Patient's education in health care setups is very low. Area of improvement in patient's education has been identified. There is need of strategies to improve the patient's knowledge regarding oral anticoagulant to minimize the risk of therapy.
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Medical Science and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
Available Online at: www.ijmacr.com
Volume 2, Issue – 6, November - December - 2019, Page No. : 173180
Corresponding Author: Roheeda Amanullah Khan, Volume - 2 Issue - 6, Page No. 173 – 180
Page 173
ISSN: 2581 3633
PubMed - National Library of Medicine - ID: 101745081
Knowledge Regarding Oral Anticoagulant Therapy among Patient with Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement: A
Cross-Sectional Study in Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
1Roheeda Amanullah Khan.RN.RM.BScN.MScN., Institute of Nursing sciences, KMU.
2Prof Dr Riaz Anwar Khan, HOD, Cardiac Surgary, LRH, Peshawar.
3Dr Dildar Khan, BSN.PhD.MHPE.
4Sardar Ali, BSN.MSN.MHPE.INS KMU.
5Rashida Bibi, R.RM.PRN.BScN.MSc N.
6Nusrat Noreen, R.RM.PRN.BScN.MSc N.
Corresponding Author: Roheeda Amanullah Khan, RN.RM.BScN. MScN., Institute of Nursing sciences, KMU.
Type of Publication: Original Research Paper
Conflicts of Interest: Nil
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the knowledge of mechanical
heart valve replacement patients regarding oral
anticoagulants.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study on
patients with mechanical valve prostheses was conducted
at Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar, Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The duration of the study was 6
months. Overall, 345 participants were included in the
study. Consecutive sampling technique has been used.
Information was collected using adopted, validated
questionnaire.
Results: Overall, 345 patients with mechanical valve
prostheses were included in the study with mean age of
the participants were 37.91 years. The age of the
participants were ranging from 19 to 62 years. Male
patients (59%) exceeded female patients (41%). Only 10%
study patients received education regarding oral
anticoagulant therapy. Majority (78.3%) patients had
inadequate overall knowledge score regarding oral
anticoagulants (Warfarin) while 16.5% had moderate
adequate knowledge and 5.2% had adequate knowledge
score.
Conclusion: The majority of studied patients had
inadequate overall knowledge regarding oral anticoagulant
(Warfarin). Patient’s education in health care setups is
very low. Area of improvement in patient’s education has
been identified. There is need of strategies to improve the
patient’s knowledge regarding oral anticoagulant to
minimize the risk of therapy.
Keywords:
Oral Anticoagulant, Warfarin, Knowledge, Mechanical
heart valve replacement.
Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the main cause of
death. Around 30% to 40% of deaths globally are due to
cardiovascular diseases. CVD cause more than 19% of
deaths in the developing countries which is the highest
number of death as compared to other diseases(1). More
than 65 million deaths worldwide are caused by
cardiovascular diseases. 80% of all cardiovascular
diseases occurred in developing countries(2).Nearly
accounts for nearly 610000 deaths per year which is one
Roheeda Amanullah Khan, et al. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
© 2019, IJMACR, All Rights Reserved
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
Page174
out of three deaths in United States (US) (3). Even the rate
of mortality reduced from 1979 to 2015(4). More than
26000 Trans-catheter aortic valve replacements have been
performed from 2011 – 2014 at 348 centers in 48 states of
America (5).
One of the major categories of cardiovascular diseases is
Valvular Heart Disease (VHD). Valvular heart disease is a
significant problem in the developing countries in which
the primary sufferers from Valvular heart diseases are
children and adults. Valvular heart diseases prevalence is
more common in men than women (6). Moderate to severe
Valvular diseases cases are notable more common in
geriatric population. With aging, the valves of the heart
deteriorate its function which lead to sever heart problems
even death (7).
To maintain the function of the heart of Valvular heart
diseased patient and to reduce premature mortality from
cardiovascular disease, valve replacement is necessary.
Heart valve replacement is the most effective and
appropriate management for Valvular Heart Disorders (8).
The most common and effective procedure of cardiac
valve replacement is the Prosthetic valve replacement,
which is usually done when the cardiac valve is unable to
perform its function. On one hand the procedure is
effective and appropriate management of VHD, on the
other hand this procedure has several complication which
can even lead to death (9).. Bleeding, valve dysfunction of
the replaced valve, heart rhythm problems, stroke
infection and blood clots formation are some of the
complications of Valvular heart replacement procedure.
Among all the complications the most important one is
thrombotic event. Thrombotic event can cause stroke
when it block the supply of the blood to the brain can lead
to death (10) .
There are certain ways used to reduce the
complications of MHVR in which the most important one
is the use of oral anticoagulant therapy (warfarin). Oral
anticoagulant (OAC) are postoperative therapy, used to
overcome the occurrence of thrombosis(11).Anticoagulant
treatment is standard therapy in post heart valve replaced
patients. OAT prevents formation of thrombosis and also
prevents the occurrence of stroke. Among oral
anticoagulants warfarin is the best medicine used for heart
valve replaced patients (12).
OAT increases the life expectancy of post-operative heart
valve replacement patients. These medications can be used
for life long with very low side effects if the patients
observe PT/INR in therapeutic range. PT/INR above the
normal range may lead to severe bleeding and thrombosis
(13).
Only patients can monitor PT/INR themselves for any
complication of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT)
Warfarin. Meanwhile it is very important for patients to
know about OAT for optimal health. Patients Nurses
should educate the patients about OAT. Low patient’s
knowledge may lead to sever problems. One side warfarin
prevent clots formation while another side it causes
thrombosis(14).
No study was found in Pakistan on “Knowledge regarding
oral anticoagulant therapy among patient with mechanical
heart valve replacement (MHVR). This paper will
discuss methods used to systematically search, retrieve
and appraise evidence on Knowledge regarding oral
anticoagulant therapy among patient with (MHVR).
Studies included in the review were presented
comprehensive evidence on Knowledge regarding OAT
among patient with mechanical heart valve replacement.
Subjects and Methods
A descriptive cross-sectional study on patients with
mechanical valve prostheses was conducted at Lady
Reading Hospital Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Pakistan. The duration of the study was 6 months, starting
from February 2019 to August 2019.
Roheeda Amanullah Khan, et al. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
© 2019, IJMACR, All Rights Reserved
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
Page175
With 95% confidence level, margin of error of 5% and
population proportion of 66% the sample size for the
study was 345 subjects. Consecutive sampling technique
has been used. Study was conducted after approval of
ASRB and ethical review board of KMU.
Data was collected using adopted Oral Anticoagulant
Knowledge test (OAK) questionnaire from post-operative
mechanical heart valve replacement patients. The
questionnaire was standard and validated (Cronbach’s
alpha = 0.767). The questionnaire was translated to Urdu
and the content validity index calculated was 0.93 with
five expert’s opinion of Government College and
cardiovascular surgeons of Lady Reading Hospital
Peshawar.
Knowledge of participants regarding oral anticoagulant
therapy was recorded as inadequate, moderate adequate
and adequate knowledge. Data was analyzed using SPSS
24.
Results
A total of 345 post-operative mechanical heart valve
replacement patients who were on warfarin therapy were
included in the study. The age of the participants ranged
from 19 to 62 years. Mean age of the participants was
37.91 years. Nearly half (46%) of the study participants
were in range of 31-40 years, followed by 40-50% which
is 27%. More than half (59%) study participants were
male while 41% participants were female. The huge
numbers (n=299) of post-operative prosthetic valve
patients were married. More than half (58%) participants
were using warfarin therapy for less than three years.
Mitral valve was the most affected heart valve of the study
participants reported by 62% participants. Similarly,
Aortic heart valve replacement was reported by 21%
participants. Both Mitral and Aortic valve were replaced
in 15% of study population. Majority (51%) study
participants were having primary level of education; only
4% participants were having master level of education
(Table 1).
Table 1: Demographic Profile of the study population, (n=345).
Frequency
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Gender
Male
205
59.4
59.4
Female
140
40.6
100.0
Age (Years)
< than 20 years
4
1.2
1.2
21 -30 years
70
20.3
21.4
31-40 years
158
45.8
67.2
40-50 years
93
27.0
94.2
> than 50 years
20
5.8
100.0
Social Status
Roheeda Amanullah Khan, et al. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
© 2019, IJMACR, All Rights Reserved
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Page176
Married
299
86.7
86.7
Unmarried
45
13.0
99.7
Divorced
1
0.3
100.0
Duration of Warfarin Therapy (Years)
< than 3 years
202
58.6
58.6
4-7 years
60
17.4
75.9
8-10 years
59
17.1
93.0
> than 10 years
24
7.0
100.0
Prosthesis Position
Mitral
215
62.3
62.3
Aortic
75
21.7
84.1
Mitral and Aortic
55
15.9
100.0
Education
Primary
176
51.0
51.0
Matric
105
30.4
81.4
FA/FSC
49
14.2
95.7
Master
15
4.3
100.0
Table 2: Knowledge on oral anticoagulation therapy among valve replacement patients (N=345).
Level of Knowledge
Number
Percentage
Inadequate Knowledge (< than 50%)
270
78.3%
Adequate Knowledge (50 – 75%)
57
16.5%
Adequate Moderately Knowledge (> than 75%)
18
5.2%
Majority (78.3%) mechanical heart valve replacement
patients had inadequate knowledge, 16.5% participants
have adequate knowledge and only 5.2% respondents have
moderately adequate knowledge regarding oral
anticoagulant therapy (Table 2).
Roheeda Amanullah Khan, et al. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
© 2019, IJMACR, All Rights Reserved
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
Page177
There was no significant association between the socio-
demographic variables and level of knowledge of
participants regarding oral anticoagulant therapy.
Discussion
Many studies have been conducted in different countries
to evaluate the knowledge of post-operative mechanical
valve replaced patients regarding oral anticoagulants
therapy (OAT) but no study has been conducted in
Pakistan regarding this issue.
The main purpose of the study was to determine the
knowledge regarding OAT (warfarin) therapy among
patients with mechanical heart valve replacement
(MHVR). Overall, 20 questions regarding the knowledge
were included in the study. The present study discovered
that majority of the study participants 78.3% had
inadequate overall knowledge score. However, the results
of the other studies evidenced moderate knowledge level
of majority (66.7%) participants with mechanical valve
replaced regarding OAT (15). Similarly, another study also
reported (61.8%) moderate knowledge in patients with
MHVR regarding OAT (16).
In addition, the results of the current study showed
majority (196) of patients responded missing one dose of
warfarin can alter the effectiveness of OAT. Literature
supports, that missing one dose of warfarin may alter the
effectiveness of OAT. It is necessary for patients to take
tablet warfarin on regular bases because missing dose can
alter the normal range of PT/INR (17). One other study also
estimated, if patient misses a single dose of warfarin and
if they remember the dose on the same day, so, it is
permissible to take the missing dose on the same day, but
if they remember it on the next day so they should not take
the missing dose because it can overdose the patient .The
patient should consult the physician regarding the missing
dose(16).(17).
The current study revealed that 70% participants reported
that they identify warfarin tablets by color. Literature also
supports that the best way to distinguish between different
strengths of warfarin is color distribution(18).
Furthermore, recent study showed (58%) of the MHV
patients reported that eating green leafy vegetables with
warfarin therapy increase the risk of thrombosis. 13%
participants respond that eating green leafy vegetables
reduce the effectiveness of warfarin. Similarly, the current
findings indicate that majority (55%) of respondent
reported that vitamin A interacts with warfarin and only
18% participants answered the correctly that vitamin K
interacts with warfarin. According to literature vitamin K
is the most important vitamin which interacts with
warfarin. It is recommended for the MHVR patients to
avoid eating green leafy vegetables to maintain INR in
normal range(19). Similarly, the findings were reported by
the study majority of the patients had low knowledge
about the influence of diet on OAT(20).
The current study showed very few patients (15%)
answered correctly about the situation in which they
should contact the primary physician, while other study
showed 66%patients answered correctly regarding contact
with primary physician while on OAT (21).
In the existing study more than half (58%) of the patients
with MHV gave correct answer about PT/INR test. The
patients responded that the PT/INR is a blood test used to
monitor warfarin therapy. In the same perspective, studies
reported majority of the patients responded that PT/INR is
a test for monitoring the OAT (22). In the same way,
literature also supports that PT/INR is a test for the
patients used OAT. PT/INR monitors the level of warfarin
and indicate the dose adjustment accordingly(23).
Majority (84%) of the participants from the recent study
reported that warfarin may be used to treat patients that
already have a blood clot, while 39% reported that
PT/INR is a blood test that is rarely done while on
warfarin. Similarly, patients with MHVR from other
Roheeda Amanullah Khan, et al. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
© 2019, IJMACR, All Rights Reserved
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
Page178
studies also supports result of this study’s that (warfarin)
are used in patients who have already a blood clot (24).
In addition, results from this study highlighted that one
forth (25%) of patients with MHVR reported the correct
answer that PT/INR value below the normal range
increase the risk of clot, while 67% reported that it
increase the risk of bleeding of patients whose PT/INR is
below the normal range. Meanwhile others study showed,
majority of the patients know that PT/INR bellow the
normal range increase the risk of having a blood clot(25).
Only 10% of patients with MHVR from the current study
gave correct answer that medicines containing aspirin and
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) may
increase risk of bleeding while on warfarin, likewise
majority (82%) participants reported that NSAID reduce
the effectiveness of the warfarin. In same context, results
from the other study showed majority of patients with
MHVR reported the correct answer that aspirin and
NSAID may increase the risk of bleeding in patients with
warfarin (26).
Less than quarter of the patients from the current study
with MHVR reported the correct answer regarding the
importance of monitoring of signs of bleeding while on
warfarin therapy. Majority (79%) responded with the
wrong answer reported that the patients on warfarin
therapy should only monitor sign of bleeding when their
PT/INR is above the normal range. In the same context,
results from other studies showed majority patients have
knowledge regarding the importance of monitoring sign of
bleeding while on warfarin therapy (27).
There are some contradictions between the results of the
current study as compared to other studies. Present study
reported only 10% patients with MHVR have received
adequate education about OAT which is very low
percentage; while studies reviewed above reported
majority of the participants received anticoagulant
education. Education regarding anticoagulant has a very
strong association with patient’s knowledge.
Conclusion
The majority of studied patients had overall inadequate
knowledge regarding OAT at the same time they had
inadequate knowledge about diet, therapeutic level and
preventive measures of complications. Since the patients
had less knowledge on effective dietary management and
drug compliance will increase the complications relates to
warfarin. Area of improvement in patient’s education has
been identified. There is need of strategies to improve the
patient’s knowledge regarding oral anticoagulant to
minimize the risk of therapy.
References
1. Kalim uddin aziz , Azhar M. A. Faruqui, Najma patel
H jaffery. Prevalence and awareness o cardiovascular
disease including life styles in a lower middle class
community in an Asian country. Pakistan Hear J.
2008;41(3):1120.
2. Yusuf S, Vaz M, Pais P. Tackling the challenge of
cardiovascular disease burden in developing countries.
Am Heart J. 2014; 148:14. [PubMed: 15215784].
3. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain
AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart disease and
stroke statistics - 2018 update: A report from the
American Heart Association. Vol. 137, Circulation.
2018. 67-492 p.
4. Pagidipati NJ, Gaziano TA. Estimating deaths from
cardiovascular disease: A review of global
methodologies of mortality measurement. Circulation.
2013;127(6):74956.
5. Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma J. The global burden of
disease: 2004 update. WHO. 2008.
6. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS,
Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular
heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet.
2006;368(9540):100511.
Roheeda Amanullah Khan, et al. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
© 2019, IJMACR, All Rights Reserved
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
Page179
7. Howell EJ, Butcher JT. Valvular heart diseases in the
developing world: Developmental biology takes
center stage. J Hear valve Dis. 2013;21(2):23440.
8. Chen Y, Yiu K. Growing importance of valvular heart
disease in the elderly. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(12):1701
3.
9. Wysowski DK, Nourjah P, Swartz L. Bleeding
Complications With Warfarin Use. Arch Intern Med
[Internet]. 2007;167(13):1414. Available from:
http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.
1001/archinte.167.13.1414
10. Yahaya AH, Hassali MA, Awaisu A, et al. Factors
associated with warfarin therapy knowledge and
anticoagulation control among patients attending a
warfarin clinic in Malaysia. J Clin Diagn Res.
2009;3(4):1663-1670.
11. Chiquette E, Amato MG, Bussey HI. Comparison of
an anticoagulation clinic with usual medical care:
Anticoagulation control, patient outcomes, and health
care costs. Arch Intern Med. 2011;158(15):16417.
12. Saksena D, Muralidharan S, Mishra YK, Kanhere V,
Mohanty BB, Srivastava CP, et al. Anticoagulation
Management in Patients with Valve Replacement. J
Assoc Physicians India. 2018;66(January):5974.
13. Butchart EG. Prosthesis-specific and patient-specific
anticoagulation. In: Butchart EG, Bodnar E, eds.
Current Issues in Heart Valve Disease: Thrombosis,
Embolism and Bleeding. London: ICR Publishers,
1992; 293317.
14. Joshua JK, Kakkar N. Lacunae in Patient Knowledge
About Oral Anticoagulant Treatment : Results of a
Questionnaire Survey. Indian J hematol blood
transfus. 2015;31(June):27580.
15. Sharaf AY, Farouk A, Ibrahim AE. Knowledge and
Adherence to Oral Anticoagulant Therapy among
Patients with Mechanical Heart Valve Prosthesis.
2017;6(3):19–29.
16. Rocha HT. Knowledge of Patients with Mechanical
Valve Prostheses Concerning Chronic Oral
Anticoagulant Therapy. J Cardiol. 2010;18(4):696
702.
17. Mazor KM, Baril J, Dugan E, Spencer F, Burgwinkle
P, Gurwitz JH. Patient education about anticoagulant
medication : Is narrative evidence or statistical
evidence more effective ? 2007;69:14557.
18. Jaffer A, Bragg LEE. Practical tips for warfarin.
2003;70(4):36171.
19. Violi F, Lip GYH, Pignatelli P, Pastori D. Interaction
between dietary Vitamin K intake and anticoagulation
by Vitamin K antagonists: is it really true?: A
systematic review. Med (United States).
2016;95(10):17.
20. Henn CB, Rabelo ER, Boaz M, Souza EN.
Conhecimento dos pacientes sobre anticoagulação oral
crônica acompanhado sem ambulatórioespecializado.
Rev GaúchEnferm. 2008;29(2):207-13.
21. Li X, Sun S, Wang Q, Chen B, Zhao Z, Xu X.
Assessment of patients’ warfarin knowledge and
anticoagulation control at a joint physician-and
pharmacist-managed clinic in China. Patient Prefer
Adherence. 2018;12:78391.
22. Kumari MJ, Amirthavalli A, Dhananchezhian K,
Jennifer D, Elakkia G, Mathumalar N, et al.
Assessment of Knowledge on Oral Anticoagulation
Therapy among Valve Replacement Patients. Int J
Adv Res. 2015;3(4):123643.
23. Ma Q, Fang J. International normalized ratio for the
guidance of warfarin treatment in elderly patients after
cardiac valve replacement. Exp Ther Med.
2018;148691.
24. Wang Y, Kong MC, Lee LH, Ng HJ, Ko Y.
Knowledge, satisfaction, and concerns regarding
warfarin therapy and their association with warfarin
adherence and anticoagulation control. Thromb Res.
Roheeda Amanullah Khan, et al. International Journal of Medical Sciences and Advanced Clinical Research (IJMACR)
© 2019, IJMACR, All Rights Reserved
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
Page180
2014;133(4):5504.
25. Rahmani P, Guzman C, Kezouh A, Blostein M, Kahn
SR. Association between patient knowledge of
anticoagulation, INR control, and warfarin-related
adverse events. J Pharm Technol. 2016;32(4):1509.
26. Shrestha S, Sapkota B, Kumpakha A, Acharya U,
Sharma R. Evaluation of patients ’ knowledge on
warfarin in outpatient pharmacy of a tertiary care
cardiac center. BMC Res Notes. 2015;15.
27. Waqas S, Hira I, Richard A, Hassan S. Warfarin
Therapy : Survey of Patients ’ Knowledge of their
Drug Regimen. Malays J Med Sci. 2014;21(4):3741.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Warfarin is a widely used anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic index, and it requires close monitoring and adequate patient education. We aimed to assess the knowledge level regarding warfarin therapy among its users and to identify the factors that significantly influence anticoagulation control. Patients and methods Patients attending the Warfarin Clinic at the Beijing Tiantan Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients’ knowledge on warfarin was assessed using a validated Anticoagulation Knowledge Assessment (AKA) questionnaire. Patients’ responses to each question were analyzed to identify areas of improvement in current warfarin education. International normalized ratio (INR) control was defined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) calculated using the Rosendaal method. Spearman correlation analysis was used to investigate the association between TTR and the independent variables. Results A total of 65 patients were enrolled in this study. Eleven questions were answered correctly by <50% of the patients. A total of 858 INR results were recorded; 432 INR values (50.3%) reached the predefined goals, and the mean TTR was 49.8%±24.8%. There were significant associations between TTR and patients’ AKA scores (R=0.356, P=0.004) and between TTR and patients’ educational levels (R=0.339, P=0.006). No significant association was observed between other factors (age and duration of anticoagulation) and TTR. The INR outcome measure was positively associated with patients’ knowledge on warfarin and their educational levels. Conclusion Areas for improvement in patient education have been identified, and processes for educational modification are currently in development.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Warfarin is widely used for the prevention and treatment of cardiac, thromboembolic and hypercoagulable diseases. Since warfarin is a narrow therapeutic index medicine, it requires close monitoring when used in the outpatient setting and on long term basis. Warfarin has been found to be associated with a number of complications especially bleeding. Patients' knowledge on warfarin can improve anticoagulation control with decrease in adverse drug reaction and other associated complications. The objective was to assess knowledge level of warfarin therapy among its users and to provide adequate education and counseling to the patients. Methods: In the present cross sectional study, 34 patients on warfarin were interviewed. Patients' knowledge on warfarin was assessed using a validated Anticoagulation Knowledge Assessment (AKA) questionnaire comprising 29 questions. Each correct answer scored 3.45 points whereas an incorrect answer scored zero point. Patient who answered at least 21 questions correctly or scored (21 × 3.45 = 72.4 %) was considered to have adequate level of knowledge or have obtained a passing score. Association between independent variables and AKA score was assessed using Pearson Chi square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Patients were counseled regarding proper warfarin use by the researcher pharmacists at the end of each data collection schedule. Results: Of the 34 patients, only 5.8 % (n = 2) achieved a passing score whereas 94.1 % (n = 32) failed to achieve the passing score. 67.6 % of the patients (n = 23) achieved a score below 50 %. More than 50 % of the patients incorrectly answered 15 questions in the questionnaire. None of the patients scored 100 %. No significant association was found between age, gender of patients and total warfarin score. A significant association (p < 0.05) was found between duration of warfarin therapy and total warfarin score. Conclusions: Warfarin knowledge was poor among the patients. Hence, regular counseling with timely assessment of their understanding was felt necessary.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To determine the factors that correlated with the patient's knowledge of warfarin therapy, the level of medication adherence and INR control. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Warfarin Clinic of Hospital Teluk Intan, Malaysia. The systematic random sampling method was used in sample selection and face-to-face interviews using standard questionnaires were administered to determine the demographic characteristics, the patient's knowledge of warfarin therapy and medication adherence. Medical records were reviewed to determine anticoagulation control during the study period. Results: A total of 52 patients were enrolled in the survey (mean ± SD age of 58.73 ± 9.55 years), with a response rate of 95%. A large proportion (63.5%) of the respondents had only primary school education and 71.2% were low-income earners (below RM500 per month). About 69% of the respondents were able to read and 53.8% were able to understand Malay (the national language of the country). A majority of the patients (98%) had verbal medication education through medical or nursing officers. Only 44.2% of patients knew about their medications, but the medication adherence was fairly good at 76.1%. The study showed that age, income level, level of education, and literacy in various languages were significantly associated with the patient's knowledge on warfarin therapy (p< 0.05). The study also showed a significant difference between those patients who knew/did not know about their medications in terms of warfarin therapy knowledge (p<0.05). Conclusion: Age, income, educational level, literacy and race were significantly correlated with the patient's knowledge of anticoagulation. The study did not find any association between anticoagulation control and the knowledge of anticoagulation. Practice Implications: The disadvantaged groups receiving anticogulation therapy, including the low-income earners, the elderly, the less-educated and the illiterate, should be given utmost care and attention.
Article
Thus far, the target value for international normalized ratio (INR) has remained to be determined. The current study aimed to further explore the INR value of the anti-coagulation drug warfarin after cardiac valve replacement. The clinical data of 213 patients who underwent cardiac valve replacement at Linyi Central Hospital (Linyi, China) between January 2010 and May 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The warfarin dosage, prothrombin time (PT) and INR were compared among patients with hemorrhage or embolism, and those with no complications. A total of 31 cases (14.6%) developed adverse reactions and complications during the medication period, including 21 cases with hemorrhage (9.9%, hemorrhage group) and 10 cases with embolism (4.7%, embolism group), while 182 patients did not (85.4%, normal group). The average dosage of warfarin was 2.0±0.6, 3.1±0.7 and 1.7±0.6 mg/day in the normal, hemorrhage and embolism groups, respectively. The dosage of warfarin, the PT and the INR in the hemorrhage group were all significantly greater than those in the normal group and the embolism group (all P<0.05). INR monitoring is recommended to ensure the safety of the anti-coagulant drug warfarin, but further study is still required to determine a reasonable target INR value.
Article
background: Prosthetic valve implantation requires postoperative prophylactic anticoagulation to preclude thrombotic events. The aim of this review is to assess the role of anticoagulation therapy in the management of valve replacement patients. methodology: Literature from PubMed, Embase, Medline and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "valvular heart disease", "anticoagulant", "mechanical heart valve", "bioprosthesis", "bridging", "Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)", and "acenocoumarol". A committee comprising leading cardiothoracic surgeons from India was convened to review the literature and suggest key practice points. results: Prosthetic valve implantation requires postoperative prophylactic anticoagulation to preclude thrombotic events. A paramount risk of thromboembolic events is observed during the first three months after surgery for both mechanical and bioprosthetic devices. The VKA therapy with individualized target international normalized ratio (INR) is recommended in patients after prosthetic valve replacement. Therapies for the management of prosthetic valve complications should be based on the type of complications. Special care is mandated in distinguished individuals and those with various co-morbidities. conclusion: In patients with prosthetic valve replacement, anticoagulant therapy with VKA seems to be an effective option. The role for non-VKA oral anticoagulants in the setting of prosthetic valve replacement has yet to be established. Furthermore, whether the novel oral anticoagulants are safe and efficacious in patients after placement of a bioprosthetic valve remains unanswered.
Article
Each year, the American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and other government agencies, brings together in a single document the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and the cardiovascular risk factors listed in the AHA's My Life Check - Life's Simple 7 (Figure¹), which include core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure [BP], and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policy makers, media professionals, clinicians, healthcare administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke produce immense health and economic burdens in the United States and globally. The Update also presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease [CHD], heart failure [HF], valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). Since 2007, the annual versions of the Statistical Update have been cited >20 000 times in the literature. From January to July 2017 alone, the 2017 Statistical Update was accessed >106 500 times. Each annual version of the Statistical Update undergoes revisions to include the newest nationally representative data, add additional relevant published scientific findings, remove older information, add new sections or chapters, and increase the number of ways to access and use the assembled information. This year-long process, which begins as soon as the previous Statistical Update is published, is performed by the AHA Statistics Committee faculty volunteers and staff and government agency partners. This year's edition includes new data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, new metrics to assess and monitor healthy diets, new information on stroke in young adults, an enhanced focus on underserved and minority populations, a substantively expanded focus on the global burden of CVD, and further evidence-based approaches to changing behaviors, implementation strategies, and implications of the AHA's 2020 Impact Goals. Below are a few highlights from this year's Update.
Article
Background: Whether the level of patient’s knowledge about warfarin plays any role in maintenance of therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) is controversial. Several studies have looked at patients’ warfarin knowledge and the level of patients’ anticoagulation control (AC). Most studies had small numbers and did not use validated questionnaires. Objectives: To use the Oral Anticoagulation Knowledge (OAK) test to assess patients’ knowledge of AC and to examine associations between knowledge, INR, and adverse events. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients were asked to complete the OAK test. Data on clinical and demographic characteristics, INR values, and thrombosis or bleeding events during the preceding 1 year period were collected. Associations between OAK scores, patient characteristics, proportion of therapeutic INRs, and bleeding/thrombosis events were assessed. Results: A total of 225 patients completed the OAK test. Mean (SD) age was 70 (13.4) years, 53% were male, and 75% were on warfarin for >3 years. Over the preceding year, 57.3% of INRs were therapeutic, and there were 22 bleeding and 6 thrombotic events. The mean OAK score was 12/20 (passing score = 15/20); 64% of patients failed the OAK test. Predictors of passing the OAK test were younger age (P = .01) and higher level of education (P = .03). There was no association between OAK score and proportion of therapeutic INRs, or OAK score and bleeding or thrombosis events. Conclusion: We used the OAK test to assess patients’ AC knowledge. Results suggests that while younger and more educated patients were more likely to pass the OAK test, the OAK test results may not predict INR control or occurrence of bleeding or thrombotic events.