Research ProposalPDF Available

Abstract

This Special Issue focuses on the importance of political institutions, such as democratic and autocratic beliefs, and examines their impact on international business (IB). The traditional definition of democracy refers to a political system characterized by “free and fair elections, adult suffrage, protection of civil liberties, and few non-elected tutelary authorities (e.g., militaries, monarchies, religious bodies)” (Filippaios, Annan-Diab, Hermidas, & Theodoraki, 2019: 1104). Under democratic governance, political governance risks can be reduced, and multinational corporations (MNCs) can benefit from democracy. In this sense, because “a true democracy” can strongly protect political rights and civil liberties (Levitsky & Way, 2010), politically transparent and democratic host countries can attract MNCs from democratic home countries (Filippaios et al., 2019).
CALL FOR PAPERS
Special Issue of the Journal of Business Research
DEMOCRACY AND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
Special Guest Editors:
Jeffrey J. Reuer (University of Colorado Boulder, USA, jeffrey.reuer@colorado.edu)
Marjorie Lyles (Florida International University, USA, mlyles@fiu.edu)
Samuel Adomako (University of Birmingham, UK,S.Adomako@bham.ac.uk)
Riikka M Sarala (University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA,rmsarala@uncg.edu)
Jeoung Yul Lee (Hongik University, Korea / Chongqing Technology & Business University, China,
jeoungyul@hongik.ac.kr)
Consulting Senior Editor: Lucia Naldi (Jönköping University, Sweden, Lucia.Naldi@ju.se)
Submission window: January 2 - September 30, 2024
Submission deadline:September 30, 2024
Tentative publication date: Spring 2026
Related tracks: International Business; CSR and Business Ethics
Motivation for the Special Issue
This Special Issue focuses on the importance of political institutions, such as democratic and
autocratic beliefs, and examines their impact on international business (IB). The traditional definition
of democracy refers to a political system characterized by free and fair elections, adult suffrage,
protection of civil liberties, and few non-elected tutelary authorities (e.g., militaries, monarchies,
religious bodies)” (Filippaios, Annan-Diab, Hermidas, & Theodoraki, 2019: 1104). Under democratic
governance, political governance risks can be reduced, and multinational corporations (MNCs) can
benefit from democracy. In this sense, because “a true democracy” can strongly protect political rights
and civil liberties (Levitsky & Way, 2010), politically transparent and democratic host countries can
attract MNCs from democratic home countries (Filippaios et al., 2019).
However, the intersection of the phenomenon of democracy and international business (IB) remains a
conceptual, theoretical, and empirical research gap in the IB field except for a few papers (e.g.,
Arregle, Miller, Hitt, & Beamish, 2013; Filippaios et al., 2019). In leading management and IB
journals, few studies have dealt with democracy in the business/management context from an IB
perspective (c.f., Stratu-Strelet et al., 2023). Furthermore, among these few studies, only two papers
have dealt with democracy and IB directly (Arregle et al., 2013; Filippaios et al., 2019). Within the
broader fields of political science and economics, the relationship between democracy, political risk,
and international trade has been examined, but few discussions have pertained to the level of
international firms, such as MNCs or small international firms (e.g., global firms), and managerial
decision-making. However, democratization plays a vital role for companies when deciding on the
modus operandi for their foreign investment (As-Saber et al., 2001). In addition, democratization can
leverage prosperity and free trade, which rely on the institutional determinants of both international
and local micro- and macroeconomic mechanisms and interest group rivalry (Henisz & Mansfield,
2006). This research gap implies interesting avenues for further research, including examining firms
in the context of less-developed, emerging markets and transition economies where “low intensity”
democratic or autocratic political regimes prevail, which influences MNCs’ operations and
globalization (Youngs, 2004).
To address this gap, this Special Issue aims to contribute to an interdisciplinary and heterogenous
understanding of the role of democracy in the IB. Democracy is a socially important and relevant
topic through which the IB can offer novel contributions with the broader goal of progress towards a
better and socially more equitable world. For example, the literature on international political
economy has examined the association between democratic governance and the degree of democracy
in host countries (Asiedu & Lien, 2011; Greider, 1998; Ursprung & Harms, 2001), with conflicting
results. Some studies have found that MNCs undertake FDI more in host countries where democratic
governance prevails (McGuire & Olson, 1996; Ursprung & Harms, 2001). On the other hand,
previous studies have revealed a negative association between MNCs’ FDI and democracies in host
countries (Greider, 1998; Wintrobe, 1998) or even a non-linear association between them (Adam &
Filippaios, 2007; Asiedu & Lien, 2011). Hence, all these studies are predominantly based on an
international political economy perspective, and there is no clear conclusion. In addition, there has
been limited exchange between the fields of international political economy and IB in translating the
findings to the level of specific critical decisions for international firm managers. There is a need to
bring interdisciplinary theorizing (from economics, political science, public administrative science,
sociology, and psychology) to the field of IB in an integrative manner, with a focus on different types
of international firms, their managers, employees, and stakeholders. Moreover, we encourage research
that pursues creative or innovative ways of operationalizing democracy and democratic governance to
capture its multiple dimensions.
Submissions should offer explicit and newtheoretical contributions(s) but can build on relevant
theoretical perspectives. It is crucial to employ a theoretical framework to link democracy—as a
broader, cross-disciplinary field of interest—and IB to develop novel theoretical insights and
contributions that can benefit decision-making in international firms.
We encourage multidisciplinary approaches and multilevel research designs. Researchers can study
democracy in the IB context based on various data sources. For example, to investigate the impact of
the political democracy of host countries and geographic regions on MNCs’ location selection,
Arregle et al. (2013) used a composite index based on factor analysis on datasets from multiple data
sources, such as Freedom House’s annual survey of political rights and civil liberties and the Political
Constraint Index (POLCON) dataset (Henisz, 2000). To explore the impact of a host country’s
political governance (democratic vs. autocratic regimes) on its attractiveness to MNCs, Filippaios et
al. (2019) measured political governance (a composite index on the spectrum of democratic and
autocratic regimes) based on Polity IV and civil liberties suppression based on Freedom House. In
addition, research can utilize content analysis based on Internet searches, newspapers, magazines,
academic journals, and surveys. Furthermore, qualitative research based on field research and
interviews can offer unique insights into these phenomena.
Specific Focus of the Special Issue
Given the understudied research gap on the effects of democracy on IB and vice versa, as well as the
related organizational outcomes and interaction effects, the themes of this call for papers are
purposefully very wide. We offer the following areas and research questions as illustrative examples
rather than an exhaustive list:
1.Democratic vs. autocratic political governance and organizations
What are the effects of different dimensions of democracy on organizational processes across
borders (e.g., international corporate social responsibility, international knowledge flows and
spillovers, internationalization process and entry mode decisions, location selections, and so on)
(Ursprung & Harms, 2001)?
● What are the relationships between institutions, political rights, civil liberties, and FDI outflows and
inflows?
● How does human capital moderate the relationship between civil liberties and FDI motives?
● What is the relationship between global CSR practices and democracy? What are their implications
on the behaviors of MNCs (Wettstein, Giuliani, Santangelo, & Stahl, 2019)? How do institutional
voids in home countries of emerging market MNCs allow them to decouple CSR from their
implementations (Tashman, Marano, & Kostova, 2018)?
What are the repercussions of well-established economic institutions and protection laws in home
and host countries to attract FDI inflows (Wong, 2016)?
2. Democracy vs. autocracy and global value chains, digitalization, environmental disruptions,
institutions, and non-market strategy
How do democracy and autocracy affect global value chains? What are their implications for the
regionalization and localization of global value chains currently? What are the implications of this
agenda for globalization/de-globalization and IB?
● How do digitalization and the fourth industrial revolution affect the relationship between democracy
and MNCs’ FDI?
How does democracy vs. autocracy affect the non-market strategies of MNCs? How do lobbying,
bribery, corruption, and political connections affect MNCs’ FDI decisions and entry modes, as well as
globalization/de-globalization?
● How do formal institutions and societal trust relate to democracy and IB (Gaur, Pattnaik, Singh, &
Lee, 2022)?
3. Research across levels of analysis
Democracy can be conceptualized at various levels, such as the supranational, regional, national,
corporate, subsidiary, functional area, team, or individual levels of analysis, as well. The examples are
as follows:
From the push-and-pull forces perspective, how does the home country’s political democracy
influence the internationalization of an MNC in a host country (Arregle et al., 2013)? How does the
host country’s “region-relative” political democracy influence the internationalization of an MNC
(Arregle et al., 2013)?
How can organizations maintain democratic rules across their overseas subsidiaries or operational
locations to obtain social outcomes or create global efficiency and outcomes?
● How do advanced vs. emerging economies-based business groups differ in their emphasis on human
rights or labor rights, and what are the implications for IB? How do different types of business groups
(i.e., widely held, state-owned, and family owned) (Cuervo-Cazurra, 2006) affect MNCs’ human or
labor rights orientation?
● How do organizations deal with human rights or labor rights across their global units (headquarters,
regional headquarters, and subsidiaries), functions, or teams?
How do entrepreneurs maintain the rule of human rights or labor rights when they expand their
start-ups to the global markets? How do MNC CEOs or senior managers maintain human rights or
labor rights for their employees in local subsidiaries, especially in the context of weak institutions?
Paper Development Workshop Conference and Symposium
To help authors further improve their papers, we will organize a paper development workshop
conference during February of 2025. We invite the authors of papers that receive the decision to
revise and resubmit their papers, but participation in the workshop is not a condition for the
acceptance of a paper for the Special Issue. This opportunity allows these authors to receive
constructive feedback from well-reputed journal editors, discussants, and conference participants, and
can support these authors in strengthening and improving their manuscripts.
In addition, we plan to hold a symposium at a major academic conference in 2026 for papers selected
for acceptance in our special issue to increase their visibility and impact.
Submission Process and Deadlines
All manuscripts will be reviewed as cohorts in this Special Issue. Manuscripts must be submitted
betweenJanuary 2 and September 30, 2024,at
https://www2.cloud.editorialmanager.com/jobr/default2.aspx, and the authors should select the article
type VSI: Democracy and IB.” All submissions will go through the JBR regular double-blind
review process and follow the standard norms and processes.
For more information on this call for a paper, please contact the Special Issue Editors.
References
Adam, A., & Filippaios, F. (2007). Foreign direct investment and civil liberties: A new perspective.
European Journal of Political Economy, 234, 1038–1052.
Arregle, J.-L., Miller, T. L., Hitt, M. A., & Beamish, P. W. (2013). Do regions matter? An integrated
institutional and semiglobalization perspective on the internationalization of MNEs. Strategic
Management Journal, 34(8), 910–934.
Asiedu, E., & Lien, D. (2011). Democracy, foreign direct investment, and natural resources. Journal
of International Economics, 841, 99–111.
As-Saber, S. N., Dowling, P. J., & Liesch, P. W. (2001). Geopolitics and its impacts on international
business decisions: A framework for a geopolitical paradigm of international business. School of
Management, University of Tasmania.
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). Business groups and their types. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,
23, 419–437.
Dunning, J. H. (1997). Governments and the macro-organization of economic activity: A historical
and spatial perspective. In J. H. Dunning (Ed.), Governments, globalization, and international
business. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and multinational enterprise: A neglected factor. Journal of
International Business Studies, 29(1), 45–66.
Filippaios, F., Annan-Diab, F., Hermidas, A., & Theodoraki, C. (2019). Political governance, civil
liberties, and human capital: Evaluating their effect on foreign direct investment in emerging and
developing economies Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 1103–1129.
Gaur, A., Pattnaik, C., Singh, D., & Lee, J. Y. (2022). Societal trust, formal institutions, and foreign
subsidiary staffing. Journal of International Business Studies, in press.
Greider, W. (1998). One world, ready or not: The manic logic of global capitalism. New York: Simon
& Schuster.
Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12,
1–31.
Henisz, W. J., & Mansfield, E. D. (2006). Votes and vetoes: The political determinants of commercial
openness. International Studies Quarterly, 50, 189–211.
Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and
inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57, 587–616.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGuire, M. C., & Olson, M., Jr. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: The
invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 72–96.
Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’ Manual 2007 Monty G. Marshall and Keith Jaggers.
Stratu-Strelet, D., Gil-Gómez, H., Oltra-Badenes, R., Oltra-Gutierrez, J. V. (2023). Developing a
theory of full democratic consolidation: Exploring the links between democracy and digital
transformation in developing eastern European countries. Journal of Business Research, 157,
113543
Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2018). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate
social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International
Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171.
Ursprung, H., & Harms, P. (2001). Do civil and political repression really boost foreign direct
investments? SSRN eLibrary.
Wettstein, F., Giuliani, E., Santangelo, G. D., & Stahl, G. K. (2019). International business and human
rights: A research agenda. Journal of World Business, 541, 54–65.
Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge Books.
Wong, M. Y. H. (2016). Democratic persistence and inequality: The role of foreign direct
investments. Studies in Comparative International Development, 51, 103–123.
Youngs, R. (2004). Democracy and the multinationals. Democratization, 11(1), 127–147.
About the Guest Editors
Professor Jeffrey J. Reuer has led courses and seminars on business and corporate strategies,
strategic investment decisions, and collaborative strategies in many graduate degree programs and
organizations. He has also taught executive education programs at Harvard Business School, Duke
University, INSEAD, the Indian School of Business, the University of Mannheim, the University of
St. Gallen, and Peking University. He served as an Associate Editor for the Strategic Management
Journal and as a Consulting Editor for the Journal of International Business Studies. He recently
coedited a special issue of the Strategic Management Journal on the interplay between competition
and cooperation. He served on the Board of Directors of the Strategic Management Society (SMS).
He has also served as the chair of the nomination and selection committee of the Fellows of the SMS,
Chief Grants Officer of the Strategy Research Foundation, co-founder of the Cooperative Strategies
Interest Group, and program chair of two SMS conferences. He is a Past Chair of the Strategic
Management Division of the Academy of Management and has also served on the organization's
executive and research committees. His recent projects have focused on the governance and design of
alliances, collaborative strategies, and applications of information economics and real options theory
to various problems in strategy, international business, and entrepreneurship. He was the first
recipient of SMS’s Emerging Scholar Award. He received the Silver Medal from the Journal of
International Business Studies for lifetime scholarly contributions to that journal.
Professor Marjorie Lyles is the International Business Distinguished Research Fellow at the Florida
International University College of Business International. She is the Past President of the Strategic
Management Society and is a Chancellor’s Emeritus Professor of Global Strategic Management at
Indiana University Kelley School of Business, and an Adjunct Professor at the Lilly Family School of
Philanthropy. She is a Fellow of the Strategy Management Society and the Association of
International Business. Her research has focused on emerging economies since the mid-1980s. Her
mixed methods and longitudinal research required her to seek research grants, including two National
Science Foundation grants that developed organizational learning and knowledge-based perspectives
by studying alliances in emerging economies. Lyles has worked with governmental, non-profit, and
corporate entities worldwide. She has served on the editorial boards of the Strategic Management
Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of International Business Studies (Area Editor),
and Global Strategy Journal.
Dr Samuel Adomako is an Associate Professor of Strategy and Innovation at the University of
Birmingham. His research examined the nexus between strategy and innovation. His research has
appeared in leading journals, including the Journal of Product Innovation Management, British
Journal of Management, International Small Business Journal, International Business Review,
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, Business Strategy and the
Environment, Management International Review, Journal of Institutional Economics, Journal of
Business Research, Journal of International Management, and many others. Dr. Adomako sits on the
editorial boards of Business Strategy and the Environment, and Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management. He has co-edited special issues in Journal of Business Research,
Industrial Marketing Management, Technological Forecasting, and Social Change. He is currently
co-editing two special issues of Journal of International Management and Management International
Review respectively. He received his PhD from the University of Warwick. He is a fellow of the
Higher Education Academy of the UK.
Professor Riikka M Sarala is a Professor of International Business at the University of North
Carolina at Greensboro. Her work focuses on corporate strategies and innovation in cross-cultural
contexts. She has published her research in the leading international business and management
journals, including Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of World Business, Strategic
Management Journal, Journal of Management, and Journal of Management Studies. She holds/has
held the position of Co-Editor-in-Chief in British Journal of Management and the Consulting Editor
of Journal of Management Studies and has co-edited special issues in Group & Organization
Management, Human Resource Management Review, and Journal of World Business. She strives to
promote a pluralistic, interdisciplinary, inclusive, and socially relevant IB research. She has been a
visiting scholar at Columbia University in NYC and EM Lyon in France, and a visiting professor at
Aalto University in Finland.
Professor Jeoung Yul Lee is a Professor of International Business at Hongik University School of
Business Management (South Korea) and a Chongqing Bayu Chair Professor selected by Chongqing
Municipality Education Commission (China) as an only Korean scholar. Currently, he serves as an
Associate Editor of the Journal of Business Research and The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, Deputy Editor of Asian Business & Management, editorial advisory board
member of the International Business Review, and editorial review board member of the Journal of
Management Studies, Management International Review, Management and Organization Review,
Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, International Journal of Consumer Studies, and European
Journal of International Management. He has served as a leading/managing guest editor of 12 SSCI
and one SCIE journal special issues of the Management International Review, Journal of Business
Research, Management and Organization Review, Management Decision, etc. He was a postdoctoral
fellow at Wharton School (USA) and a Visiting Associate Professor at Leeds University Business
School (UK). His work focuses on advanced and emerging market MNCs’ strategic management,
human rights and global supply chains, human resource management, and CSR. He has also published
63 papers in SSCI journals, such as the Journal of International Business Studies (2015, 2019, 2022,
2023) and Human Resource Management (2019, 2022).
Professor Lucia Naldi is a Professor in Business Administration and Vice President for Research.
She received her doctoral degree from the JIBS and held an M.Sc. at the University of Florence. Her
main research and teaching focus on entrepreneurship, international business, and strategy. Her
research focuses on the growth and internationalization of small and young firms. She is also
interested in entrepreneurship in various contexts, including family, media, and rural firms. Lucia’s
research has been published in several journal articles and book chapters. Lucia is affiliated with the
Centre for Family Enterprise and Ownership (CeFEO) and the Centre for Entrepreneurship and
Spatial Economics (CEnSE).
Article
Full-text available
Empirical studies that examine the impact of democracy on foreign direct investment (FDI) assume that the relationship between democracy and FDI is the same for resource exporting and non-resource exporting countries. This paper examines whether natural resources in host countries alter this relationship. We estimate a linear dynamic panel-data model using data from 112 developing countries over the period 1982-2007. We find that democracy promotes FDI if and only if the value of the share of minerals and oil in total exports is less than some critical value. We identify 90 countries where an expansion of democracy may enhance FDI and 22 countries where an increase in democratization may reduce FDI. We also find that the effect of democracy on FDI depends on the size and not the type of natural resources.
Article
This study examines the interactive effects of host-country societal trust and formal institutions on foreign subsidiary staffing strategies. Based on the conceptualization of institutions in new institutional economics, we demonstrate that high societal trust and strong formal institutions that support market-based exchange jointly reduce the incidence of expatriate staffing in foreign subsidiaries. We identify two contingency factors – subsidiary interdependence and host-country experience – that affect this relationship. Our finding suggests that the level of interdependence among subsidiaries within the MNE network and the host-country experience of the subsidiaries negatively moderate the interactive effect of formal and informal institutions on expatriate staffing. We test our hypotheses based on longitudinal data of 6675 foreign subsidiaries of 435 Korean MNEs in 42 countries between 1990 and 2014.
Article
We study the influence of a country’s political governance on its attractiveness to foreign direct investors. We argue that democracy is not a unidimensional concept and that the effect of host-country political governance on incoming foreign direct investment (FDI) differs depending on whether FDI originates from a democratic or an autocratic country. We also hypothesize that the effect of civil liberties depends on the motivations of investing multinational enterprises (MNEs) and that human capital moderates this relationship. We test our hypotheses on a sample of 35,000 investments in emerging and developing countries between 2003 and 2013.
Article
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is an important element of the global economy and a central component of economic development strategies of both developed and developing countries. Numerous scholars theorize that the economic benefits of attracting multinational corporations come at tremendous political costs, arguing that democratic political systems attract lower levels of international investment than their authoritarian counterparts. Using both cross-sectional and time-series cross-sectional tests of the determinants of FDI for more than 100 countries, I generate results that are inconsistent with these dire predictions. Democratic political systems attract higher levels of FDI inflows both across countries and within countries over time. Democratic countries are predicted to attract as much as 70 percent more FDI than their authoritarian counterparts. In a final empirical test, I examine how democratic institutions affect country credibility by empirically analyzing the link between democracy and sovereign debt risk for about eighty countries from 1980 to 1998. These empirical tests challenge the conventional wisdom on the preferences of multinationals for authoritarian regimes.
Article
Traditional research suggests a relationship between country-level institutions and the location choices of MNEs. However, more recent theory suggests MNEs also focus on regions (semiglobalization). Therefore, this study examines institutional effects in the context of semiglobalization by considering the influences of three formal institutions (i.e., regulatory control, political democracy, capital investments) of countries and geographic regions on MNEs' location choices of internationalization. We use a sample of Japanese MNEs operating in 45 countries within eight regions. The results show that their degree of internationalization into a country is influenced by both country and regional institutional environments. Additionally, a semiglobalization perspective provides better explanatory power than does the country-level perspective. These results present a new perspective on how MNEs consider institutional environments in their international strategy.
Article
This article has two main tasks. The first is to trace the lineage of academic writings since the time of Adam Smith, on the respective roles of markets, hierarchies, inter-firm alliances and governments as modes of organizing economic activity in a capitalist economy; and, also, to analyze why, and in what ways, economists, political scientists and organizational theorists have differed in their interpretation of the optimal role of governments. The second is to examine the implications of the internationalization, and more recently the globalization, of economic activity for the governance of resource creation and deployment, and the extent to which national administrations and supranational regimes need to modify their agendas and policy prescriptions in the light of the growing mobility of many tangible and intangible assets. The article will further argue that changing patterns of demand and technological advances - especially as they have impacted on the coordinating and transaction costs of value added activity, and on the institutions and cultural infrastructures underpinning such activity have critically affected the merits of alternative modes of economic organization; and that, over the years, the optimal combination of these modes has undergone a marked change.
Article
The conjecture that democracy discourages foreign direct investment (FDI) has been widely refuted in empirical studies. However, we find support of this view. We distinguish between civil and political liberties and propose that multinational firms tend to invest in countries with low civil but with high political liberties. We show that the negative relationship between civil liberties and FDI is hump-shaped. A threshold level of civil liberties exists, below which repression of civil liberties is associated with more FDI. The results are explained by different economic motives for FDI in different groups of countries.