Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Citation: Rhouma, M.; Archambault,
M.; Butaye, P. Antimicrobial Use and
Resistance in Animals from a One
Health Perspective. Vet. Sci. 2023,10,
319. https://doi.org/10.3390/
vetsci10050319
Received: 19 April 2023
Accepted: 25 April 2023
Published: 28 April 2023
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
veterinary
sciences
Editorial
Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Animals from a One
Health Perspective
Mohamed Rhouma 1,2,3,* , Marie Archambault 1,3 and Patrick Butaye 4
1Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitéde Montréal,
3200 Rue Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 2M2, Canada
2Groupe de Recherche et d’Enseignement en SalubritéAlimentaire (GRESA), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
Universitéde Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 2M2, Canada
3Swine and Poultry Infectious Diseases Research Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
Universitéde Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 2M2, Canada
4Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
*Correspondence: mohamed.rhouma@umontreal.ca; Tel.: +1-450-773-8521 (ext. 52416)
Among the many global health issues, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one that
exemplifies the One Health approach, defined as a joint effort in which multiple disciplines
collaborate to provide solutions for human, animal, and environmental health [
1
]. Indeed,
AMR is predominantly the result of the irresponsible and excessive use of antimicrobials in
various sectors, such as human/veterinary medicine and agriculture (e.g., plant health).
Accordingly, solutions must be contributed by all relevant stakeholders to address this
global issue. The real dangers posed by the rapid loss of antimicrobial effectiveness, which
has been precipitated by the selection and spread of AMR bacteria, have prompted policy
makers to recognize this threat to health care systems and the economy while considering
it as a budgetary and regulatory priority [
2
]. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has
generated powerful incentives and momentum with respect to raising awareness of the
importance of having effective drugs to treat microbial infections and the need to ensure
their efficacy over time [
3
]. As the number of brand-new antimicrobials available on the
market has drastically decreased since the 1990s [
4
], it is therefore crucial to implement all
possible strategies, in both human and veterinary medicine, to minimize the selection of
AMR bacteria while preserving the efficacy of the existing drugs and ensuring their optimal
longevity. Notably, the protection of the current antimicrobial arsenal is of particular
concern in veterinary medicine, where the possibility of acquiring new antimicrobials is
extremely limited and drug repurposing has been scarcely explored (unlike the trend in
human medicine) [4].
Hence, the theme of this Special Issue is very topical and of particular interest to
the various stakeholders involved in the management of AMR in animals and at the
human–animal–environment interface. Indeed, several studies have shown that the misuse
and excessive use of antimicrobials in the human health care and livestock industries
are the main drivers of AMR [
5
–
7
]. How livestock contributes to the spread of AMR in
humans continues to be studied. The most recent studies do not quite indicate that there is
a large impact of AMR in animal bacteria on AMR in human bacteria, with the exception of
zoonotic bacteria [
7
–
9
]. However, it was recently shown that the effect of antimicrobial use
(AMU) on AMR have a bidirectional influences on AMR in human and animal bacteria on a
global scale [
10
]. These recent findings once again underscore the critical need to accelerate
the implementation of the One Health approach to address the global AMR crisis.
Among the possible solutions, research on alternatives to antibiotics for use in an-
imals seems necessary to contain the threat of AMR. For instance, it has been reported
that Romanian propolis ethanolic extracts present significant
in vitro
antibacterial activ-
ity against clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dog-derived superficial
Vet. Sci. 2023,10, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10050319 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/vetsci
Vet. Sci. 2023,10, 319 2 of 3
dermatitis samples and could, therefore, constitute a promising therapeutic option against
this potential skin infection [
11
]. Likewise, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) present
in vitro
antibacterial activity against some bacterial pathogens (e.g., Staphylococcus pseudintermedius,
Staphylococcus aureus,Escherichia coli) and low toxicity to mammalian cells, suggesting that
AgNPs could be used as an alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial skin
infections, including infected wounds in animals [12].
The monitoring of AMR in animals and the characterization of the AMR patterns of
certain indicator bacterial strains are of crucial importance for the development of policies
that will ensure the responsible use of antimicrobials in animals. The development of
standardized AMR testing methods and harmonized interpretive criteria in veterinary
medicine are necessary to facilitate scientifically based stewardship and justified AMU in
animals [
13
]. It has also been shown that the susceptibility testing of bacteria, which are
not routinely investigated for AMR profiling, should sometimes be incorporated in AMR
surveillance systems alongside the consideration of the epidemiological and microbiological
data specific to certain countries [
14
] or to certain animal production sectors (e.g., the fish-
farming sector) [15].
Moreover, AMR in zoonotic bacteria (e.g., Salmonella) remains problematic in some
countries, with high rates of bacterial resistance to first- and second-line antimicrobials
being reported, thus urging various stakeholders in animal production to implement
effective policies to limit the spread of AMR [16].
Drug repurposing and repositioning, which consist of identifying new therapeutic
uses for existing molecules, have been scarcely investigated in veterinary medicine. In this
regard, it has been shown that the anti-inflammatory properties of doxycycline may be
useful for the long-term treatment of severe bronchiectasis in dogs [17].
Finally, in an overview of AMU in food-producing animals and of the current state of
knowledge regarding the role of farm animals in the spread of AMR in humans, actions
taken in the livestock industry were presented, from a sustainable animal production
perspective, in order to limit the spread of AMR bacteria and preserve the effectiveness of
antimicrobials [18].
Notably, the Guest Editors of this Special Issue have remarked that despite the growing
interest in veterinary antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), the optimization of the therapeutic
use of antimicrobials (with respect to dose, administration intervals, and treatment dura-
tions), which constitutes the key component of this concept, has not received the attention
it deserves in animals compared to that seen in human medicine, and this aspect must be
improved in future studies.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.;
writing—review and editing, M.R., M.A. and P.B.; supervision, M.R. and P.B. All authors have
read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments:
We are grateful to all authors and reviewers who contributed to the success of
this Special Issue.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Velazquez-Meza, M.E.; Galarde-López, M.; Carrillo-Quiróz, B.; Alpuche-Aranda, C.M. Antimicrobial resistance: One Health
approach. Vet. World 2022,15, 743. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Rhouma, M.; Madec, J.-Y.; Laxminarayan, R. Colistin: From the shadows to a One Health approach for addressing antimicrobial
resistance. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2023,61, 106713. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.
Rhouma, M.; Tessier, M.; Aenishaenslin, C.; Sanders, P.; Carabin, H. Should the increased awareness of the One Health approach
brought by the COVID-19 pandemic be used to further tackle the challenge of antimicrobial resistance? Antibiotics
2021
,10, 464.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.
Boyd, N.K.; Teng, C.; Frei, C.R. Brief overview of approaches and challenges in new antibiotic development: A focus on drug
repurposing. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021,11, 684515. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vet. Sci. 2023,10, 319 3 of 3
5.
Ahmad, I.; Malak, H.A.; Abulreesh, H.H. Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: A potential threat to public
health. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021,27, 101–111.
6.
Holmes, A.H.; Moore, L.S.; Sundsfjord, A.; Steinbakk, M.; Regmi, S.; Karkey, A.; Guerin, P.J.; Piddock, L.J. Understanding the
mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 2016,387, 176–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
Pokharel, S.; Shrestha, P.; Adhikari, B. Antimicrobial use in food animals and human health: Time to implement ‘One
Health’approach. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020,9, 181. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.
Tang, K.L.; Caffrey, N.P.; Nóbrega, D.B.; Cork, S.C.; Ronksley, P.E.; Barkema, H.W.; Polachek, A.J.; Ganshorn, H.; Sharma,
N.; Kellner, J.D. Restricting the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals and its associations with antibiotic resistance in
food-producing animals and human beings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Planet. Health
2017
,1, e316–e327.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.
Mughini-Gras, L.; Dorado-García, A.; van Duijkeren, E.; van den Bunt, G.; Dierikx, C.M.; Bonten, M.J.; Bootsma, M.C.; Schmitt,
H.; Hald, T.; Evers, E.G. Attributable sources of community-acquired carriage of Escherichia coli containing
β
-lactam antibiotic
resistance genes: A population-based modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2019,3, e357–e369. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.
Allel, K.; Day, L.; Hamilton, A.; Lin, L.; Furuya-Kanamori, L.; Moore, C.E.; Van Boeckel, T.; Laxminarayan, R.; Yakob, L. Global
antimicrobial-resistance drivers: An ecological country-level study at the human–animal interface. Lancet Planet. Health
2023
,7,
e291–e303. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11.
Dégi, J.; Herman, V.; Igna, V.; Dégi, D.M.; Hulea, A.; Muselin, F.; Cristina, R.T. Antibacterial activity of Romanian propolis against
Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from dogs with superficial pyoderma: In vitro test. Vet. Sci. 2022,9, 299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12.
Thammawithan, S.; Siritongsuk, P.; Nasompag, S.; Daduang, S.; Klaynongsruang, S.; Prapasarakul, N.; Patramanon, R. A
biological study of anisotropic silver nanoparticles and their antimicrobial application for topical use. Vet. Sci.
2021
,8, 177.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
13.
Fernandes, V.; Cunha, E.; Nunes, T.; Silva, E.; Tavares, L.; Mateus, L.; Oliveira, M. Antimicrobial resistance of clinical and
commensal Escherichia coli canine isolates: Profile characterization and comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility results according
to different guidelines. Vet. Sci. 2022,9, 284. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.
Mahmoud, S.F.; Fayez, M.; Swelum, A.A.; Alswat, A.S.; Alkafafy, M.; Alzahrani, O.M.; Alsunaini, S.J.; Almuslem, A.; Al Amer,
A.S.; Yusuf, S. Genetic Diversity, Biofilm formation, and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cow, camel,
and mare with clinical endometritis. Vet. Sci. 2022,9, 239. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.
Ojasanya, R.A.; Gardner, I.A.; Groman, D.B.; Saksida, S.; Saab, M.E.; Thakur, K.K. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of bacteria
commonly isolated from farmed salmonids in Atlantic Canada (2000–2021). Vet. Sci. 2022,9, 159. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.
Oueslati, W.; Rjeibi, M.R.; Benyedem, H.; Mamlouk, A.; Souissi, F.; Selmi, R.; Ettriqui, A. Prevalence, risk factors, antimicrobial
resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella in northeast Tunisia broiler flocks. Vet. Sci.
2021
,9, 12. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
17.
Szatmári, V.; van Geijlswijk, I.M. Sub-antimicrobial dosage scheme of doxycycline for the chronic treatment of bronchiectasis in a
dog. Vet. Sci. 2022,9, 137. [CrossRef]
18.
Rhouma, M.; Soufi, L.; Cenatus, S.; Archambault, M.; Butaye, P. Current insights regarding the role of farm animals in the spread
of antimicrobial resistance from a One Health perspective. Vet. Sci. 2022,9, 480. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.