ArticlePDF Available

Case Report: Glucagon-Inducing Vomiting for a Mid-Esophageal Coin Ingestion

Authors:
  • King Saud University Medical City
Clinical Case Reports: Open Access
Case Report | Vol 6 Iss 2
ISSN: 2582-5038
https://dx.doi.org/10.46527/2582-5038.254
Citation: Yousif A, Alwulayi HH, Bazie EA, et al. Case Report: Glucagon-Inducing Vomiting for a Mid-Esophageal Coin Ingestion. Clin
Case Rep Open Access. 2023;6(2):254.
©2023 Yumed Text.
1
Case Report: Glucagon-Inducing Vomiting for a Mid-Esophageal Coin
Ingestion
Amal Yousif1, Hind Hamad Alwulayi2, Elsharif A Bazie3*and Fahad Mishal Alharbi4
1Pediatric Medicine Emergency Consultant, King Abudullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Prince Noura University,
Saudi Arabia
2General Pediatrics Resident, Royal Commission Hospital, Saudi Arabia
3Pediatrics Consultant, Pediatric Emergency Physician, Security Forces Hospital, Saudi Arabia
4Pediatric Medicine Consultant, Security Forces Hospital, Saudi Arabia
*Corresponding author: Elsharif A Bazie, Pediatrics Consultant, Pediatric Emergency Physician, Security Forces Hospital,
Saudi Arabia, Tel: +966 11 802 4444; E-mail: elsharifbazie@gmail.com
Received: April 04, 2023; Accepted: April 27, 2023; Published: May 05, 2023
1. Introduction
Foreign body (FB) ingestion is commonly encountered by paediatricians and emergency physicians. In 2000, the American
Association of Poison Control Centers documented more than 107 000 incidents of FB ingestion by children and adolescents
[1]. Children make up 80% of the patients seeking medical care after ingesting FBs, with the peak occurrence being between 6
months and 3 years of age [2].
As far back as 1936, Chevalier Jackson attributed the swallowing or aspiration ofto 'carelessness' [3]. Unfortunately, even the
most conscientious parents are unable, at times, to prevent their children from placing objects into their mouths, either because
the child moves too quickly, or the parents are unaware of the ingestion (which can make the diagnosis more difficult) [4].
Abstract
Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a commonly encountered problem by pediatricians and emergency physicians. We presented a
nine-year-old boy with mid-esophageal cion ingestion who vomited the coin after glucagon injection.
Keywords: Coin; Esophogeal; Glucagon; Vomiting
www.yumedtext.com | May-2023 | ISSN: 2582-5038 | https://dx.doi.org/10.46527/2582-5038.254
2
Coins are the commonly encountered ingested FBs leading to paediatric consultations, with 92 166 cases reported to poison
centres 2003 [5].
Although FBs cause severe morbidity in less than 1% of all patients, approximately 1500 deaths annually in the USA are
attributed to ingested FBs [6].
Patients with retained oesophageal coins-whether symptomatic or asymptomatic-are at risk of complications. Symptomatic
patients often complain of pain, difficulty breathing, or difficulty swallowing. These patients are often agitated and should
undergo immediate removal. The complications associated with symptomatic oesophageal coins include focal mucosal
necrosis, oedema, and agitation that can lead to airway compromise. Asymptomatic patients with oesophageal coins should
undergo emergency or urgent evaluation for complications associated with the retained coin. These complications vary in
severity and frequency. They include oesophageal stricture formation [7], perforation [8], oesophageal-aortic fistula formation
[9], tracheoesophageal fistula formation [10], as well as the development of life-threatening respiratory distress with or without
cyanosis [11].
2. Case Presentation
A healthy 9-year-old boy presented to our emergency department 4 hours after ingesting a coin. The chief complaints were
difficulty swallowing and neck pain. There was no drooling, shortness of breath, or cough. He was alert, well-perfused, and
had normal vital signs on examination. Chest auscultation revealed equal bilateral air entry and no added sounds. The findings
of the cardiovascular, abdominal, and neurological examinations were all normal. His anterior posterior and lateral chest x-rays
(FIG. 1&2) revealed mid-oesophageal lodging of a coin and normal chest findings. The patient was put on vital signs monitor,
and 1 mg of intravenous glucagon was administered. After this, he vomited the coin and was kept for 2 hours for observation
of oral intake and vital signs. He was then discharged in good condition.
FIG. 1. Anteroposterior chest x ray showing a mid-oesophageal coin.
www.yumedtext.com | May-2023 | ISSN: 2582-5038 | https://dx.doi.org/10.46527/2582-5038.254
3
FIG. 2. Lateral chest x ray showing a mid-oesophageal coin.
3. Discussion
In Saudi Arabia, coins are the most ingested FBs [12]. The first step of witnessed or suspected coin ingestion is a series of
radiographs to identify the presence and location of any coins, with a concentration on the edges of the coin to exclude the
double halo sign of a button battery, which may easily be mistaken for a coin [13].
The use of metal detectors has been recommended in asymptomatic patients [14-17].
Endoscopic retrieval is the most widely used retrieval method. Less-expensive alternative procedures include Foley catheter
extraction and bougienage [18-22]. Pharmacologic options, such as muscle relaxants, especially glucagon and benzodiazepines,
have been used sporadically [23,24]. Glucagon safe to administer to induce immediate and short-lived relaxation of enteric
smooth muscle [25]. Glucagon administration could increase the spontaneous passage of coins into the stomach and reduce the
need for invasive retrieval [12]. It also causes only nausea and vomiting in some patients and is contraindicated in patients with
glucagon hypersensitivity, insulinoma, and pheochromocytoma [26].
In their 10-year retrospective study, Ibrahim et al [27], found coins to be the most ingested type of FB, followed by button
batteries. Most of the swallowed coins were passed spontaneously, and those that necessitated intervention were managed using
upper endoscopy.
Assiri et al. [28] reported a case of a coin that was retained in the oesophagus for 4 years.
A double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted by Mehta et al. [29] demonstrated a lack of efficacy of glucagon in dislodging
oesophageal coins.
Our patient regurgitated the coin after he was given the glucagon getting the benefit from glucagon inducing vomiting.
www.yumedtext.com | May-2023 | ISSN: 2582-5038 | https://dx.doi.org/10.46527/2582-5038.254
4
4. Conclusion
Coins are the most encountered retained FBs in children. Symptomatic patients require immediate intervention to prevent
complications associated. More data and studies are needed regarding glucagon's emetogenic effect as a treatment option for
retained oesophageal FBs.
REFERENCES
1. Litovitz TL, Felberg L, White S, et al. 1995 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers
Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. Am J Emerg Med. 1996;14(5):487-537.
2. Webb WA. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract: update. Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;41(1):39-51.
3. Henderson FF, Gaston EA. Ingested foreign body in the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Surg. 1938;36(1):66-95.
4. Louie J, Alpern E, Windreich R. Witnessed and unwitnessed esophageal foreign bodies in children. Ped Emerg Care.
2005;21(9):582-5.
5. Watson WA, Litovitz TL, Klein-Schwartz W, et al. 2003 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control
Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System. Am J Emerg Med. 2004,22(5):335-404.
6. Uyemura MC. Foreign body ingestion in children. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(2):287-91. Erratum in: Am Fam
Physician. 2006;73(8):1332.
7. Doolin EJ. Esophageal stricture: an uncommon complication of foreign bodies. Ann Otol Rhinol
Laryngol.1993;102(11):863-6.
8. Nahman BJ, Mueller CF. Asymptomatic esophageal perforation by a coin in a child. Ann Emerg Med. 1984;13(8):627-
9.
9. Vella EE, Booth PJ. Foreign body in the oesophagus. Brit Med J. 1965;2:1042
10. Obiako M. Tracheoesophageal fistula A complication of foreign body. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1982;91(3 Pt
1):325-7.
11. Byard RW, Bourne AJ, Adams PS. Sudden and unexpected death - A late effect of occult intraesophageal foreign
body. Pediatr Pathol. 1990;10(5):837-41.
12. Altokhais TI, Al-Saleem A, Gado A, et al. Esophageal foreign bodies in children: Emphasis on complicated cases.
Asian J Surg. 2017;40(5):362-6.
13. Kramer RE, Lerner DG, Lin T, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies in children: a clinical report of the
NASPGHAN Endoscopy Committee. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60(4):562-74.
14. Beiehler J, Tuggle D, Stacy T. Use of the transmitter-receiver metal detector in the evaluation of pediatriccoin
ingestions. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993;9(4):208-10.
15. Younger RM, Darrow DH. Handheld metal detector confirmation of radiopaque foreign bodies in the esophagus. Arch
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(11):1371-4.
16. Schalamon J, Haxhija E, Ainoedhofer H, et al. The use of a handheld metal detector for localization of ingested
metallic foreign bodies: a critical investigation. Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163(4-5):257-9.
17. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, et al. Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest
Endosc. 2002;55(7):802-6.
www.yumedtext.com | May-2023 | ISSN: 2582-5038 | https://dx.doi.org/10.46527/2582-5038.254
5
18. Berggreen PJ, Harrison E, Sarnowski RA, et al. Techniques and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction
in children and adults. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39(5):626-30.
19. Schunk JE, Harrison M, Corneli HM, et al. Fluoroscopic Foley catheter removal of esophageal foreign bodies in
children: experience with 415 episodes. Pediatrics. 1994;94(5):709-14.
20. Campbell JB, Condon VR. Catheter removal of blunt esophageal foreign bodies in children. Survey of the Society for
Pediatric Radiology. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;19(6-7):361-5.
21. Emslander HC, Bonadio W, Klatzo M. Efficacy of esophageal bougienage by emergency physicians in pediatric coin
ingestion. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27(6):726-9.
22. Bonadio WA, Jona J, Cohen R. Esophageal bougienage technique for coin ingestion in children. J Pediatr Surg.
1988;23(10):917-8.
23. Trenkner SW, Maglinte DD, Lehman GA, et al. Esophageal food impaction: treatment with glucagon. Radiology.
1983;149(2):401-3.
24. Tibbling L, Bjorkhoel A, Jansson E, et al. Effect of spasmolytic drugs on esophageal foreign bodies. Dysphagia.
1995;10(2):126-7.
25. Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, Hoke SE, et al. Effect of glucagon on esophageal motor function. Gastroenterology.
1974;69(1):160-5.
26. Marks HW, Lousteau RJ. Glucagon and esophageal meat impaction. Arch Otolaryngol. 1979;105(6):367-8.
27. Ibrahim AH, Andijani A, Abdulshakour M, et al. What Do Saudi Children Ingest? A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis
of Ingested Foreign Bodies From a Tertiary Care Center. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(12):e1044-50.
28. Assiri H, Alshareef W, Aldriweesh B, et al. Coin retained in the upper esophagus for more than 4 years: A case report
and literature review. Ear Nose Throat J. 2022;7:1455613221106212.
29. Mehta D, Attia M, Quintana E, et al. Glucagon Use for Esophageal Coin Dislodgment in Children: A Prospective,
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(2):200-3.
... In 2000, the American Association of Poison Control Centers reported that 75% of the patients presented with foreign body ingestions were children vomiting can be used in mid-oesophageal coins [8]. Our aim is to study the presentation and outcomes of patients attending our Emergency Department with foreign body ingestion. ...
Article
Full-text available
Foreign body ingestion is the accidental or intentional swallowing of an object that can affect the oesophagus. The clinical presentation depends on the foreign body's location, size, and nature. Common clinical presentations include coughing, difficulty breathing, nausea, vomiting, chest pain, and fever. Objective To study the demographic data, presentation and disposition of foreign body ingestion patients. Material and Methodology This research was a retrospective study conducted within a Security Forces Hospital setting. The study protocol involved the inclusion of all patients aged 0 to 14 who visited the Paediatric emergency department and reported foreign body ingestion. Result The total study population were 45 patients; males were 24 (53.3%). 88.2% of our patients had no symptoms at presentation. Coins ingestion occurs in 18 (40%) patients. Conclusion Our study findings are similar to the literature description for foreign body ingestion.
Article
Full-text available
Coins are among the most common foreign bodies ingested by children, especially those below 5 years of age. Early endoscopic retrieval of esophageal coins minimizes the risk of serious complications. However, significant morbidity and mortality are reported when coins are retained in the gastrointestinal tract for prolonged periods of time. We report a case in which a coin was retained in the upper esophagus for 4 years and presented a distinctive clinical course. An esophageal coin retained for a prolonged period may place the patient at a risk of complications such as tracheoesophageal fistulas. The management of patients with complicated aerodigestive tract foreign bodies is challenging. To avoid a delayed diagnosis and to improve the patients’ safety, the quality of medical care in rural areas should be monitored by implementing continuous educational programs for primary physicians.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: Few studies investigated the correlation between foreign body (FB) ingestion and occurrence of complications. The local literature is limited to case reports and small case series on esophageal FBs. We conducted this study to identify the high-risk factors predisposing to complications among Saudi children ingesting FBs. Methods: The medical records of 436 children (boys, 59.6%; mean age, 4.4 ± 2.7 years) presenting to the emergency department (ED) between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Relative risk analysis of clinical variables was performed between 2 groups: The first group constituted children without FB-related complications (n = 389), and the second group included those with major complications (n = 14). Major complication was defined as any event associated with significant morbidity such as esophageal stricture, esophageal perforation, esophageal fistula, and intestinal perforation or fistula formation. Results: Most of the 436 cases presented between ages 2 and 4 years (35.1%). Coin was the most commonly ingested FB (22.9%) followed by button battery (19.5%). Most of the ingested FBs passed spontaneously without intervention (69%). Upper endoscopy was performed in 121 cases (27.7%). By multivariate analysis, the variables that were significantly associated with major complications included the following: very young age group (0-2 years; odds ratio [OR], 11.5), button battery (OR, 4), FB impacted at upper esophagus (OR, 8.7), and longer time duration to visit the ED (OR, 14.7). Conclusion: Button battery impaction at upper esophagus in very young children and delayed presentation to the ED were the most significant risk factors of FB-related complications.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Esophageal foreign bodies (EFBs) are a relatively common clinical problem in pediatric patients. The majority of EFBs pass harmlessly through the gastrointestinal tract; however, some EFBs can cause significant morbidities. This study was conducted to review our experience in managing esophageal foreign bodies in pediatric patients, with an emphasis on the management and outcomes of complicated cases. Methods: Between March 1995 and March 2013, the records of all children up to the age of 12 years who were admitted to King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, with a final diagnosis of EFBs were reviewed. The medical records were analyzed with respect to demographic data, presenting symptoms, workup investigation, management, complications, and outcomes. Results: Seventy patients were identified (38 boys and 32 girls). The ages ranged from 5 days to 12 years (mean: 4.4 years). Fifty-three (75.7%) patients presented within 24 hours. Thirteen (18.6%) patients had underlying predisposing factors. The most common EFB, found in 30 (42.8%) patients, was a coin. Witnessed ingestion of a FB was documented in 52 (74.2%) patients. The most common symptoms were drooling of saliva in 42 (60%) patients, followed by vomiting in 36 (51.4%) patients. Four (5.7%) patients presented with complications secondary to FB impaction, including hypopharyngeal wall perforation, acquired esophageobronchial fistula, localized esophageal perforation with inflammation, and perforation with stricture formation. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 12 months, and all patients had complete recovery without any sequelae. Conclusion: EFBs are a relatively common problem in pediatric patients, and underlying predisposing factors to EFB impaction are not uncommon. Long-retained EFBs are associated with a higher incidence of complications. Rigid esophagoscopy was successful in extracting most of the EFBs and was shown to be a safe and effective procedure.
Article
Because many patients who have swallowed foreign bodies are asymptomatic, physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion. The majority of ingested foreign bodies pass spontaneously, but serious complications, such as bowel perforation and obstruction, can occur. Foreign bodies lodged in the esophagus should be removed endoscopically, but some small, blunt objects may be pulled out using a Foley catheter or bougie. Once they are past the esophagus, large or sharp foreign bodies should be removed if reachable by endoscope. Small, smooth objects and all objects that have passed the duodenal sweep should be managed conservatively by radiographic surveillance and inspection of stool. Endoscopic or surgical intervention is indicated if significant symptoms develop or if the object fails to progress through the gastrointestinal tract.
Article
Our interest in the problem of the ingested foreign body which presents itself below the esophagus has been stimulated by 2 cases seen within recent months at the Boston City Hospital. In 1 of these the anterior wall of the stomach near the pylorus had been perforated by a chicken bone, giving rise to a clinical picture which was confused with that of acute cholecystitis. In the second case the clinical picture was confused with that of acute fulminating appendicitis with perforation and local peritonitis. At operation the terminal portion of the ileum was found to have been perforated by a bit of squash rind. These cases are reported in detail later. In making this study we have limited our attention to those cases in which the foreign body, or the complications arising from it, have been located below the esophagus and above the rectum, since a foreign body in
Article
Foreign body ingestions in children are some of the most challenging clinical scenarios facing pediatric gastroenterologists. Determining the indications and timing for intervention requires assessment of patient size, type of object ingested, location, clinical symptoms, time since ingestion and myriad other factors. Often the easiest and least anxiety-producing decision is the one to proceed to endoscopic removal, rather than observation alone. Due to variability in pediatric patients' size, there are less firm guidelines available to determine which type of object will safely pass, as opposed to the clearer guidelines in the adult population. In addition, the imprecise nature of the histories often leaves the clinician to question the timing and nature of the ingestion. Furthermore, recent changes in the types of ingestions encountered, specifically button batteries and high-powered magnet ingestions, create an even greater potential for severe morbidity and mortality to children. As a result, clinical guidelines regarding management of these ingestions in children remain varied and sporadic, with little in the way of prospective data to guide their development. An expert panel of pediatric endoscopists was convened and produced this review that outlines practical clinical approaches to the pediatric patient with a variety of foreign body ingestions.This guideline is intended as an educational tool that may help inform pediatric endoscopists in managing foreign body ingestions in children. Medical decision-making, however, remains a complex process requiring integration of clinical data beyond the scope of these guidelines. These guidelines should therefore not be considered as a rule or as establishing a legal standard of care. Caregivers may well choose a course of action outside of those represented in these guidelines due to specific patient circumstances. Furthermore, additional clinical studies may be necessary to clarify aspects based on expert opinion rather than published data. Thus these guidelines may be revised as needed to account for new data, changes in clinical practice or availability of new technology.
Article
• Glucagon is suggested as an alternate method of treatment in difficult cases of esophageal meat impaction. Glucagon has been used in diagnostic roentgenology to facilitate smooth muscle relaxation. We describe its characteristics and mode of action, and we report two cases that emphasize the advantages of glucagon therapy as a primary modality or as an alternative in problem cases. (Arch Otolaryngol 105:367-368, 1979)
Article
This study evaluates the effect of exogenous glucagon on esophageal motor function in man. Manometric studies were performed using an infused catheter system. Resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was monitored before and after intravenous pulse doses of glucagon (1 to 100 mug). The effect of glucagon (0 mug ) on esophageal peristalsis was also studied. Multiple blood samples were taken for determination of glucagon, insulin, and glucose concentration. Glucagon effect on LES pressure was also evaluated after LES stimulation by continuous intravenous infusion and pentagastrin (0.04 mug per kg per min). Glucagon caused a transient significant decrease of LES pressure only at pulse doses (20 and 100 mug) which caused nonphysiological elevation of plasma glucagon levels. The temporal profile of decreased LES pressure correlated closely with maximal blood glucagon levels. Glucagon caused no demonstrable change in esophageal peristalsis. During LES stimulation by pentagastrin, glucagon caused significant transient decreases of LES pressure at doses as low as 1 mug per kg. We conclude that glucagon at sufficient dosage has an inhibitory effect on LES pressure. This inhibitory effect is not mediated through changes in serum insulin or glucose and appears to be pharmacological.
Article
Acute upper airway obstruction in a 4-month-old male infant who presented as sudden infant death syndrome is described. At autopsy external tracheal compression and tracheobronchitis with plugging of the trachea and bronchi by an abundant mucopurulent exudate were found. The source of the inflammation was the adjacent esophagus where previous impaction of a coin had caused pressure necrosis with mucosal erosion and transmural granulation tissue formation. This case is reported to demonstrate that foreign bodies that remain in the esophagus, having by-passed the larynx, may still result in upper airway obstruction and death in early infancy by this unusual mechanism.
Article
The membership of the Society for Pediatric Radiology was surveyed to determine the safety and efficacy of the Foley catheter technique. Completed questionnaires were returned from 148 institutions. Sixty-four institutions reported that they were currently removing blunt esophageal foreign bodies utilizing the balloon catheter. Over 2500 patients were reported as having been treated utilizing this technique. Only one potentially serious but reversible complication was observed.