Content uploaded by Pablo Manzano
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Pablo Manzano on Apr 19, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
4/18/23, 11:18 PM
Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands | Science
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq4062
21/25
269 S. Chatterjee, B. Price, Regression Analysis by Example (Wiley, ed. 2, 1991).
GO TO REFERENCE •GOOGLE SCHOLAR
SHOW FEWER
eLetters (2)
eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLet-
ters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded gures cannot be submitted, and
we discourage the use of gures within eLetters in general. If a gure is essential, please include a link to the gure
within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.
LOG IN TO S UBMIT A RE SP ONSE
MAR. 27, 2023
Grazing research should consider mobility and governance
PABLO MANZANO Basque Centre for Climate Change - BC3, Bilbao, Spain
FRANCISCO M. AZCÁRATE Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain
SLIMANE BENCHERIF University of Djelfa, Algeria
DANIEL BURGAS University of Jyväskylä, Finland
BAYARMAA BYAMBAA Technical University of Munich; Germany
MAR CABEZA University of Helsinki, Finland
LUIS CADAHÍA University of Oslo, Norway & University of Extremadura, Spain.
DAWN CHATTY University of Oxford, UK
JUSSI T. ERONEN University of Helsinki, Finland
KATHLEEN A. GALVIN Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.
PEDRO M. HERRERA Fundación Entretantos, Valladolid, Spain
ØYSTEIN HOLAND Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
MOUSTAPHA A. ITANI University of Helsinki, Finland
MARYAM NIAMIR-FULLER Retired-Director of UNEP GEF, Purcellville, VA, USA.
FERRAN PAUNÉ University of Vic, Spain.
GREGORY K. PERRIER Northern Virginia Community College; Manassas, VA, USA
IAN SCOONES University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
OULA SEITSONEN Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada & University of Oulu, Finland
NILS CHR. STENSETH University of Oslo, Norway
ELSA VARELA University of Göttingen, Germany
ANN WATERS-BAYER German Institute for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture (DITSL), Witzenhausen, Germany
Maestre et al. (1) analyse the effect of livestock grazing on drylands at the global scale, contrasting low, medium,
and high levels of grazing pressure. Their effort in putting together an extensive collection of sampling points in
many of the world’s grazing ecosystems, and measuring multiple environmental variables is commendable, with a
very detailed capture of environmental services. However, the study suffers from an excessively simplied under-
standing of livestock-husbandry practices in the drylands, leading to inappropriate assumptions and misleading
conclusions.
We suggest that the claimed negative effects of high grazing pressure on ecosystem services in dry rangelands are
misleading because the study i) fails to include pastoralist mobility as a grazing management factor, and therefore
follows the error of many who do not differentiate between livestock systems (2); ii) does not consider how do-
mestic livestock mobility can enhance ecosystem services, including the conservation of wild herbivores; and iii)
excludes consideration of rangeland governance systems centred on livestock mobility that can improve both pro-
ductivity and ecosystem services – including biodiversity – in variable dryland ecosystems.
Mobility is a core strategy that both domestic and wild herbivores use to respond to environmental variability, but
this factor is excluded from the study by Maestre et al. (1), in which only xed plots with assumed constant graz-
ing pressure are assessed. In sedentary livestock systems, productivity (3), climate change mitigation (4), tree re-
generation (5), and genetic health of plant populations (6) underperform compared to mobile livestock systems in
the same environment. This is particularly critical in dryland systems, where reduced net primary productivity
translates into slower recovery from continuous disturbances and where mobility is a crucial element for the sus-
tainable and efcient use of natural resources (3, 4, 7). Mobility is a key factor for the ecological functionality of
wild herbivore systems (8) and for the prevention of land degradation (9). Migratory use of the drylands can ac-
commodate a large biomass of both domestic and wild herbivores (10).
GRAZING AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICE DELIVER…
CHECK ACCESS
HOME
SCIENCE
VOL. 378, NO. 6622
PDF
Help
4/18/23, 11:18 PM
Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands | Science
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq4062
22/25
Maestre et al. (1) observe a correlation between low wild herbivore diversity and higher grazing pressure in drier
areas. This may, however, not reect causality but rather the need for wild herbivores to migrate seasonally away
from drier areas, or may reect poor governance of rangelands that impedes domestic or wild herbivore migration
in the areas that need it most. This may include undermining management of common resources and setting up
fences that prevent mobility through the landscape (11). While pastoralists can cope with such changes through
fodder provision if economic resources are available, this comes at a cost in terms of land degradation caused by
animal concentrations (12). This may be the effect measured by Maestre et al. (1) at some sites.
Pastoral systems are prime examples of socio-ecological systems (SES) where human communities are tightly cou-
pled with the local ecology, and have reciprocal feedbacks loops. They have developed in an intimate relationship
with their surroundings throughout their long history (13). While Maestre et al. (1) provide a good overview of the
grazing ecosystems, their viewpoint is mainly on the ecology and on the biotic/abiotic factors, and how these af-
fect the services provided from the ecosystem.Their viewpoint would gain much from deeper integration of the
human component, such as through the SES lens. It includes the modes of governance (both traditional and that
implemented by modern nation states), mobility, and stewardship by the drylands’ pastoral communities.
Effective governance is important for the quality of rangeland management (14). Different modes of governance
have major repercussions for ecosystem services through overuse of certain land areas, number of animals, and
the cascades that affect the biotic systems as a whole – and also interact with the abiotic environment.
Constraints on mobility in pastoral systems in dry rangelands can result in land degradation (15). Traditional pas-
toralist knowledge is holistic, but modern governance and also research have often overlooked it and its complex-
ity, triggering crises in pastoralism and land use caused by poorly thought-through policies (2, 13). But if mobile
systems are supported by appropriate policy and governance arrangements – which are measurable by specic in-
dicators (13) – then pastoralists’ productive and sustainable use of heterogeneous drylands would become evident.
The results reported in Maestre et al. (1) may therefore reect inappropriate policy and governance regimes in
dryland areas that limit mobility, rather than the inherent consequence of grazing, and may lead to inappropriate
policies for areas grazed by pastoralists’ livestock (2, 13) if such factors are not considered. We need more holistic
understanding of dryland ecosystems.
1. Maestre et al., Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands. Science 378, 915-920 (2022). doi
10.1126/science.abq4062
2. I. Johnsen, M. Niamir-Fuller, A. Bensada, A. Waters-Bayer, A Case of Benign Neglect: Knowledge Gaps about
Sustainability in Pastoralism and Rangelands (UNEP & GRID-Arendal, 2019).
3. Scoones, "New directions in pastoral development in Africa" in Living with Uncertainty: New Directions in
Pastoral Development in Africa (Intermediate Technology Publications, 1995), pp. 1–36.
4. Pardo, R. Casas, A. del Prado, P. Manzano, Carbon footprint of transhumant sheep farms: accounting for nat-
ural baseline emissions in Mediterranean systems. ResearchSquare 1838904 [Preprint] (2022).
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1838904/v1.
5. P. Carmona, F. M. Azcárate, E. Oteros-Rozas, J. A. González, B. Peco, Assessing the effects of seasonal grazing
on holm oak regeneration: implications for the conservation of Mediterranean dehesas. Biol. Cons. 159, 240-
247 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.11.015
6. García-Fernández et al., Herbivore corridors sustain genetic footprint in plant populations: a case for
Spanish drove roads. PeerJ 7, e7311 (2019). doi:10.7717/peerj.7311
7. Krätli, N. Schareika, Living off uncertainty: the intelligent animal production of dryland pastoralists. Eur. J.
Dev. Res. 22, 605-622 (2010). doi:10.1057/ejdr.2010.41
8. A. Kristensen, J.-C. Svenning, K. Georgiou, Y. Malhi, Can large herbivores enhance ecosystem carbon persis-
tence? Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 117–128 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.09.006
9. F. Starrs, Transhumance as Antidote for Modern Sedentary Stock Raising. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 71, 592-602
(2018). doi:10.1016/j.rama.2018.04.011
10. Nandintsetseg et al., Variability in nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors
of dryland ungulates. Ecosphere 10, e02924 (2019). doi: 10.1002/ECS2.2924
11. Y. Said et al., Effects of extreme land fragmentation on wildlife and livestock population abundance and dis-
tribution. J. Nat. Conserv. 34, 151-164 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2016.10.005
12. Bencherif, P. Manzano, in Proceedings of the Joint XXIV International Grassland and XI International
Rangeland Virtual Congress Kenya 2021 (KALRO, 2022), pp. 917–920.
13. Manzano et al., Toward a holistic understanding of pastoralism. One Earth 4, 651–665 (2021).
doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.012
14. M. Herrera, J. Davies, P. Manzano Baena, Eds, The governance of rangelands: collective action for sustainable
pastoralism (Routledge, 2014).
15. FAO, Making way: developing national legal and policy frameworks for pastoral mobility (FAO, 2022).
MAR. 28, 2023
Grazing pressure, rather than management practice, is key to interpret our results: A response to
Manzano et al.
GRAZING AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICE DELIVER…
CHECK ACCESS
HOME
SCIENCE
VOL. 378, NO. 6622
PDF
Help
Maestre et al. (1) observe a correlation between low wild herbivore diversity and higher grazing pressure in drier
areas. This may, however, not reflect causality but rather the need for wild herbivores to migrate seasonally away
from drier areas, or may reflect poor governance of rangelands that impedes domestic or wild herbivore migration