ArticlePDF Available

Hematological and Biochemical parameters study of female albino rats treated with lamotrigine drug

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The present study was aimed to investigate the possible effects of the anti-epileptic drug lamotrigine (LTG) on some haematological and biochemical parameters in adult female rats. Forty-eight female rats were divided into three groups (each group=16). Group one can be considered as a control group, group two and three administrated lamotrigine drugs orally at a dose of 3.57mg/kg body weight and 7.14mg/kg body weight for 7,14,21,28 day and all groups fed with standard rat feed. The results showed that there were significant (P≤0.05) changes in haematological parameters in group two and three when compared with the control group during all period except the mean level of corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC). The liver enzyme aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) and serum urea, creatinine with calcium, potassium, sodium and chloride ion showed significant alteration in the treated group, the relative organ weight showed significant changes in group two and three in comparison with control group during 7,14,21 and 28 days. Estradiol level in group three increased at 7, 14 and 21 day and decreased at 28 days of treatment when compared with group two and the control group. This study suggested that treatment of healthy female albino rats with therapeutic doses of lamotrigine drug for 28 days generally affect on included parameters in this study.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science Vol. 24 (3) 2019
23
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science
ISSN: 1813 1662 (Print) --- E-ISSN: 2415 1726 (Online)
Journal Homepage: http://tjps.tu.edu.iq/index.php/j
Hematological and Biochemical parameters study of female albino rats
treated with lamotrigine drug
Gawhar Ahmed Shekha , Kalthum Asaaf Maulood
Department of Biology, College of Education, Salahaddin University , Hawler , Kurdistan region , Iraq
https://doi.org/10.25130/tjps.v24i3.365
A r t i c l e i n f o.
Article history:
-Received: 18 / 10 / 2018
-Accepted: 26 / 12 / 2018
-Available online: / / 2019
Keywords: Lamotrigine,
Hematological, Biochemical change,
Estradiol, Female Rat.
Corresponding Author:
Name: Kalthum Asaaf Maulood
E-mail: Kalthuma5@gmail.com
Tel:
ABSTRACT
The present study was aimed to investigate the possible effects of the
anti-epileptic drug lamotrigine (LTG) on some haematological and
biochemical parameters in adult female rats. Forty-eight female rats were
divided into three groups (each group=16). Group one can be considered
as a control group, group two and three administrated lamotrigine drugs
orally at a dose of 3.57mg/kg body weight and 7.14mg/kg body weight
for 7,14,21,28 day and all groups fed with standard rat feed. The results
showed that there were significant (P≤0.05) changes in haematological
parameters in group two and three when compared with the control group
during all period except the mean level of corpuscular haemoglobin
concentration (MCHC). The liver enzyme aspartate transaminase (AST)
and alanine transaminase (ALT) and serum urea, creatinine with calcium,
potassium, sodium and chloride ion showed significant alteration in the
treated group, the relative organ weight showed significant changes in
group two and three in comparison with control group during 7,14,21
and 28 days. Estradiol level in group three increased at 7,14 and 21 day
and decreased at 28 days of treatment when compared with group two
and the control group. This study suggested that treatment of healthy
female albino rats with therapeutic doses of lamotrigine drug for 28 days
generally affect on included parameters in this study.
1. Introduction
Numerous non-epileptic central nervous system
disturbances were treated with Antiepileptic drugs
(AEDs), in both psychiatry and neurology[1]. AEDs
have many mechanisms of action, which comprise
modification of c-aminobutyric acid and
glutamatergic neurotransmission, and changes of
voltage-gated ion channels or intracellular signaling
route. These mechanisms of action may describe the
efficiency of AEDs in the treatment of epilepsy,
bipolar disturbance and neuropathic ache [2].
Lamotrigine consist of 6- (2,3- dichlorophenyl)-1,2,4-
triazine 3,5-diamine C9H7Cl2N5 is a new
antiepileptic drug derived from pyrimethamine,
which differs from ordinarily available AEDs. It has
an effective role in treating both partial and
generalized seizure [3].
Lamotrigine effort its antiepileptic activity by
blocking the release of excitatory neurotransmitters,
especially glutamate and aspartate in the central
nervous system [4]. LTG considered as the second
generation of anti-epileptic drug (AED) that has been
widely used for partial and generalized seizures in
adults and children if it's used as monotherapy or in
combination with other AEDs [5]. In addition,
because of its safety feature, it has been recognized as
a first line drug for the treatment of women during
pregnancy and childbearing age [6]. LTG display first
request linear pharmacokinetics following oral
administration, it is rapidly and completely absorbed
into the circulatory system with an extreme
concentration in plasma after 13 hours [7]. Hepatic
metabolism is the main path of lamotrigine
elimination, unchanged LTG excreted by renal
system accounts for less than 10% [8].
In most countries, women constitute the broadly of
users of these new AEDs [9]. In a study, mice treated
with lamotrigine 6 and 12 mg/kg-1 bm for 21 days
showed that a significant increase in total white blood
cell count [10]. Healthy rats treated with lamotrigine
for different periods noted a significant increase in
blood parameters when compared with the control
group [11]. There were no significant changes in
hematological parameters among healthy males
treated with 50mg lamotrigine [12] Milosheska et.al.
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science Vol. 24 (3) 2019
24
2016 [13] showed non-significant differences in
serum AST and ALT in patients treated with
lamotrigine at dose 50mg/day. After long-term
treatment with lamotrigine in male and female rats,
no changes were demonstrated in liver, kidney and
brain weight [14]. Lamotrigine does not alter the
serum concentrations of estradiol when used with
another ant-epileptic drug in healthy female [15].
This study aimed to quest the effect of two doses of
lamotrigine drug on some haematological,
biochemical, ions, estradiol level of a female albino
rat for different periods.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Drug
Lamotrigine drug was used in the present work which
manufactured by ELEA neuroscience Company,
Argentina, obtained from a local market (pharmacy)
in Hawler province-Iraq. The applied therapeutic
dose was 3.57mg/kg bw and 7.14mg/kg bw. The
applied doses were orally administrated by gavage
once daily for 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. Determination
of drug doses were depended on the animal’s body
weight [16].
2.2. Animals
Forty-eight healthy adult female albino rats of Wistar
strain, Sprague-Dawley, weighing between 125-
175gm. Obtained from the animal house in the
Department of Biology, College of Education,
University of Salahaddin-Erbil were used. The rats
were housed in plastic cages under a standard
condition at 22±2 oC temperature with, 12:12
light/dark cycle during the experimental period. They
were fed with pellet diet and tap water ad libitum at
least for 7 days before the experiment. Animals were
divided into 3 experimental groups of 16 rats per
group. The 3.57mg/kg bw and 7.14mg/kg bw dose of
LTG administrated orally by gavage to each treated
animals every morning once daily for 7,14,21,28 days
according to animal body weight, while the control
group administrated with 1 ml water for 7, 14, 21, 28
days.
Blood collection
Blood was collected from each animal through
cardiac puncture and collected into sterilized EDTA
tubes for evaluation of hematological parameters such
as white blood cell (WBC) count, red blood cell
(RBC) count, hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, Packed
cell volume (PCV) level, red blood cell indices (mean
corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular
volume (MCV), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin
concentration (MCHC)) and platelet (PLT) count by
using automated hematology analyzer (Japan).
Serum was separated using gel tube and centrifuged
at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes and then stored frozen
until used.
Liver enzymes: Serum used to determine aspartate
transaminase, alanine transaminase using the kits for
each test by Cobas E411.
Kidney function test: Serum used to estimate, urea
and creatinine using the kit for each one.
Ion evaluation: Serum used to evaluate calcium,
potassium, sodium and chloride ion levels
Hormonal Assay: Serum used to determine estradiol
level using ELISA.
Organs Weight: At the end of the treatment, each rat
was sacrificed using ketamine hydrochloride (100mg/
kg bw) the liver, kidney, brain, and lung were
removed, cleaned from adherent tissues and
weighted.
Statistical Analysis: Data was analyzed using
factorial test and Duncan according to the Statistical
Package for Social Science (SPSS) system version
20. The level of significance was accepted under level
probability 0.05. [17]
Results
Treatment of rat with two doses of lamotrigine drug
for 28 days were associated with a significant
decrease in haemoglobin concentration in group 3
(7.14mg/kg bw) in days 7, 21 and 28, in day 14
increased significantly, group2(3.57mg/kg bw)
decreased significantly in days 14 and 28 when
compared with control group. Packed cell volume
level decreased significantly in group3 in days 7, and
28, group 2 decreased significantly in days 14 and 28,
with a nonsignificant decrease in group 2 and 3 in day
21. White blood cell count decreased significantly in
group 3 in days 7 and 21 and increased significantly
in day 28 when compared with group 2 and the
control group. About platelet count, the statistical
analysis showed a significant increase in group 3 in
days 7 and 14, with a non-significant increase in both
groups in day 28 (Table 1).
Table (1): Mean ± S.E. of lamotrigine drug effect on haemoglobin concentration, packed cell volume,
white blood cell count and platelet count of rat treated with 3.57mg, 7.14mg, and control group
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science Vol. 24 (3) 2019
25
for 28 days.
M±S.E. of Haematological parameters
Hb gm/dl
PCV %
WBC 10 9 /l
Plate109 /l
Treated for 7 days
12.18±0.40ef
30.85±1.93d
10.70±1.08b
624.75±24.16cd
13.08±0.28edc
35.13±0.63bc
8.80±0.35cb
676.68±9.52bc
11.95±0.21f
30.38±1.02d
6.73±0.83d
741±34.66ba
Treated for 14 days
13.50±0.14bc
36.83±0.23b
10.88±0.28b
483.71±11.65e
12.53±0.42edf
32.85±1.30c
10.43±0.72b
795.32±73.87a
13.88±0.41bac
37.15±1.15ba
10.83±0.36b
731±12.73ba
Treated for 21 days
14.63±0.08a
39.95±0.22a
10.85±0.52b
643.65±38.83bcd
14.18±0.17ba
38.13±0.46ba
7.97±0.39cd
735.50±35.72ba
13.33±0.49bdc
37.63±1.51ba
6.30±0.07d
595.50±27.30cd
treated for 28 days
13.73±0.36bac
37.23±0.83ba
7.25±1.13cd
566±10.09cd
12.43±0.26edf
31.38±0.34d
13.65±0.43a
573.75±11.21ed
13.68±0.28bac
36.78±0.39ba
10.85±0.67b
585.13±9.37ed
Means with the same letter are not significantly different
Red blood cell (RBC) count and indices in days 7, 14,
21 and 28 of all experimental group were
demonstrated in the table (2). RBC count in group 2
and 3 decreased significantly in days 21 and 28 and
insignificantly in day 14, and day 7. Group 2
increased significantly while group 3 decreased when
compared with the control group. Both of two groups
showed a significant decrease in the level of mean
corpuscular volume in days 21 and 28 with a
nonsignificant decrease in day 14 and non-significant
alteration in day 7, mean corpuscular haemoglobin
level decreased non-significantly in days 21 and 28,
significant differences in day 14. Mean corpuscular
haemoglobin concentration level increased
significantly in group 2 and 3 in day 28, non-
significant increase in days 7, 14 and 21.
Table (2): Mean ± S.E. of lamotrigine drug effect on red blood cell and RBC indices of rat treated with
3.57mg, 7.14mg, and control group at 28 days of treatment.
Groups
M±S.E. of Haematological parameters
RBC 1012/l
MCV fl
MCH pg
MCHC gm/dl
treated for 7 days
Control
6.05±0.16fe
52.35±0.85dc
20.43±0.59ba
38.17±0.60a
Group2
6.40±0.31dec
56.98±1.29a
20.13±0.49b
38.90±0.84ba
Group3
5.69±0.13f
54.08±1.39bac
20.90±0.27ba
39.18±1.21a
treated for 14 days
Control
6.38±0.19dec
54.78±0.13bac
20.75±0.21ba
36.38±0.23ba
Group2
6.32±0.21de
53.08±1.42c
20.23±0.39b
38.78±0.57a
Group3
6.00±0.11bdec
56.57±1.33bc
21.73±0.61a
38.50±0.56a
treated for 21 days
Control
7.20±0.17a
56.85±0.59a
21.18±0.43ba
36.83±0.17ba
Group2
6.58±0.18bdec
55.40±0.68bac
20.55±0.39ba
37.45±0.34ba
Group3
6.72±0.23bdac
53.58±0.89bc
20.13±0.42b
37.63±0.43ba
treated for 28 days
Control
6.98±0.16bac
55.15±0.81bac
20.45±0.14b
34.23±0.44ba
Group2
6.42±0.12dec
49.68±0.40d
20.28±0.74ba
36.35±3.06b
Group3
6.08±0.14ba
53.50±0.51bc
20.38±0.22ba
38.23±0.34a
Means with the same letter are not significantly different
Table (3) shows that the level of liver enzymes which
include aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine
transaminase (ALT). AST level in group 2 increased
significantly, while in group 3 decreased significantly
in days 7,14 and 28, and both of them changed non-
significantly in day 21. The significant decrease
observed in the level of ALT in group 3 in days 14
and 21, and non-significantly in days 7and 28. Group
2 decreased non-significantly during all period except
in day 14, serum urea and creatinine level increased
significantly in group 2 and 3 in day 14, while in days
7,21 and 28 the level decreased gradually.
Table (3): Mean ± S.E. of lamotrigine drug effect on serum AST, ALT, urea and creatinine of rat treated
with 3.57mg, 7.14mg, and control group at 28 days of treatment
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science Vol. 24 (3) 2019
26
Groups
M±S.E. of Biochemical parameters
AST U/L
ALT U/L
Urea mg/dl
Creatinine mg/dl
treated for 7 days
Control
191.50±0.65bc
63±1.29a
49.50±1.55a
0.45±0.06b
Group2
211.75±23.05ba
64.25±1.38a
41.75±0.85bc
0.33±0.05c
Group3
147.48±6.28d
61.50±4.11ba
45.23±1.11ba
0.40±0.03cb
treated for 14 days
Control
154.25±1.89dc
63.75±1.93a
29.52±0.96f
0.35±0.03a
Group2
223.71±28.99ba
51.25±2.39dc
38±041edc
0.40±0.04cb
Group3
138.74±4.59d
51.75±2.87dc
43.50±1.44bac
0.42±0.06cb
treated for 21 days
Control
155.50±7.93dc
55.25±1.11bc
34.50±3.97edf
0.40±0.07cb
Group2
159.25±6.49dc
49.72±1.49dc
34.19±3.47edf
0.37±0.08cb
Group3
144.75±9.59d
45.51±5.48d
31.25±3.20ef
0.28±0.01a
treated for 28 days
Control
204.25±12.39ba
64.25±0.48a
38.24±2.81bdc
0.40±0.02cb
Group2
240.50±13.53a
61.22±1.11ba
35.71±1.26bdc
0.33±0.01c
Group3
136.50±9.12d
63.47±0.65a
37±0.41edc
0.36±0.07cb
Means with the same letter are not significantly different
A significant increase of liver weight was observed in
group 3 in days 7 and 21 and non-significantly in
group 2 and 3 in days 14 and 28. Right, and left
kidney weight increased significantly in group 3 in
day 7. Lung weight decreased significantly in group 3
in day 7 while brain weight increased significantly in
group 2 and 3 in days 14 and 28 and non-significantly
in days 7 and 21. (Table 4).
Table (4): Mean ± S.E. of lamotrigine drug effect on the liver, right and left kidney, lung, and brain of rat
treated with 3.57mg, 7.14mg and control group at 28 days of treatment.
Groups
M±S.E. of Organ weight mg
Liver
R. kidney
L. kidney
Lung
Brain
treated for 7 days
Control
5.83±0.22dc
0.62±0.04b
0.52±0.03c
1.57±0.19a
1.70±0.08cbd
Group2
6.87±0.52ba
0.70±0.05ba
0.57±0.02bc
1.30±0.07ba
1.72±0.02cbd
Group3
7.50±0.15a
0.76±.03a
0.69±0.06ba
1.19±0.12b
1.79±0.06cb
treated for 14 days
Control
6.28±0.08bdc
0.72±0.05ba
0.63±0.02bac
1.47±0.01ba
1.48±0.01e
Group2
7.31±0.39ba
0.73±0.02ba
0.67±0.03bac
1.42±0.09ba
1.70±0.02cbd
Group3
7.15±0.33ba
0.75±0.05a
0.72±0.05a
1.47±0.15ba
1.82±0.01b
treated for 21 days
Control
7.08±0.11ba
0.69±0.01ba
0.67±0.02ba
1.49±0.07ba
1.60±0.03cbd
Group2
6.39±0.10bdc
0.62±0.05b
0.58±0.04bc
1.29±0.07ba
1.65±0.03d
Group3
5.52±0.14d
0.61±0.01b
0.58±0.01bc
1.22±0.04b
1.69±0.03cd
treated for 28 days
Control
6.62±0.27bac
0.73±0.05ba
0.66±0.04ba
1.41±0.02ba
1.53±0.03a
Group2
6.99±0.67ba
0.68±0.02ba
0.64±0.05bac
1.38±0.08ba
1.68±0.04cd
Group3
7.23±0.16ba
0.72±0.03ba
0.65±0.04ba
1.40±0.07ba
1.79±0.06cb
Means with the same letter are not significantly different
Effect of lamotrigine on estradiol level observed in
fig. (1). A significant increase was shown in group 2
and 3 in day 7, nonsignificant increase in days 14 and
21 with a significant decrease in day 28 when
compared with the control group.
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science Vol. 24 (3) 2019
27
Figure (1): Effect of lamotrigine on serum estradiol level
after days 7,14,21 and 28 in female rat treated with
3.5mg,7.14mg, and control group.
Figure (2) demonstrated a significant increase in
calcium ion level in group 2 and 3 in days 14 and 21
with non-significant changes in days 7 and 28.
Figure (2): Effect of lamotrigine on serum calcium ion
level after 7, 14, 21 and 28 days in female rat treated
with 3.5mg, 7.14mg and control group.
Potassium ion level increased significantly in group 2
and 3 in day 14 and a significant decrease in day 28
with the nonsignificant change at day 21.fig. (3).
Figure (3): Effect of lamotrigine on serum potassium ion
level after 7, 14, 21 and 28 days in female rat treated
with 3.5mg, 7.14mg, and control group.
According to sodium ion level, there was a
nonsignificant increase in group 2 and 3 in days 14,
21 and 28, a significant decrease in day 7. Fig. (4).
Figure (4): Effect of lamotrigine on serum sodium ion
level after 7, 14, 21 and 28 days in female rat treated
with 3.5mg, 7.14mg, and control group.
Fig. (5) showed chloride ion level in group 2 and 3
which non-significant in days 7,21and 28 and a
significant increase in group3 in day 14.
Figure (5): Effect of lamotrigine on serum chloride ion
level after 7, 14, 21 and 28 days in female rat treated
with 3.5mg, 7.14mg, and control group.
Discussion
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) prescribed as typical
treatment and are widely used for not only epilepsy,
bipolar disorder, and chronic pain but also for a
diversity of nonepileptic conditions [18]. One out of
three antiepileptic drugs users used these drugs for
epilepsy [19]. A huge number of AEDs are
obtainable. Since 1990, 16 new or second-generation
AEDs have been recorded, and lamotrigine is one of
them [20]. Lamotrigine after oral administration is
quickly and completely absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract with Tmax values of 2.2 hours.
Food does not affect the bioavailability of lamotrigine
and the pharmacokinetics are dose relative [21]. By
glucuronidation, N-2 glucuronide is considered as a
major metabolite of Lamotrigine [22].
In healthy volunteers, the elimination half-time is
32.8 hours [21]. The present study showed significant
in hematological parameters especially in hemoglobin
concentration, packed cell volume and white blood
cell count in group 2 and 3 in days 7 and 28, this
result is in agreement with Adeneye et.al. 2006 [23]
who noted that, the blood considered as an
appropriate medium of transport for numerous drugs
in the human body and for that matter components of
red blood cells, white blood cells, haemoglobin, and
platelets are exposed to notable concentrations of
toxic compounds, as damage and demolition of the
blood cells which are harmful to the normal
functioning of the body.
About 1-3 million blood cells (erythrocytes,
leucocytes, and platelets) produced in a healthy adult
and this value could be changed in abnormal
physiological or pathological condition [24]. The
normal ranges of haematological parameters and
blood formation rate were affected by these drugs
which including cytotoxic agents [25]. LTG does not
change the weights of many organs or laboratory
measures such as complete blood count and
biochemical parameters [26].
In healthy volunteers, using lower doses of
lamotrigine (25mg/day) may be hard to measure in
clinical laboratory method; while high doses cause
serious adverse events [12]. Serum AST, ALT, urea,
and creatinine were altered and the value of some of
them were significant and others were not. A
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science Vol. 24 (3) 2019
28
significant increase of liver enzymes ALT & AST
was observed at the end of 21 days of treatment with
lamotrigine in adult male Wistar rats after picrotoxin
treatment -induced convulsions [27]. Many studies
recorded that most antiepileptic drugs could cause
hepatotoxicity, LTG caused a temporary elevation of
liver enzymes without appearing symptoms or signs
of hepatic dysfunction to hepatotoxicity [28].
Serum AST and ALT are good index of liver function
and increasing of these enzymes can be used as
biomarkers to previse the possible toxicity of
lamotrigine drug [29]. These enzymes play an
important role in different metabolic routes [30].
Level of AST and ALT increased significantly in the
group treated with lamotrigine which showed the
lamotrigine effect on liver function and often
suggests the presence of liver problems [31]. While
Fayad and Choueiri,2000 [32] reported that the
discontinuous use of LTG does not affect liver
function and liver enzymes. In spite of using
lamotrigine or any medical does, dietary choline
deficiency and physical exercise may cause elevation
of liver enzymes [33].
Ali et.al.2003 [34] revealed that acute treatment with
any dose of LTG (1.3, 2.6 and 5.2 mg/kg) does not
affect many biochemical parameters, and chronic
treatment (21 days) with all doses of LTG did not
exhibit any hepatotoxic activity. Second-generation
antiepileptic drugs cause less induction of liver
enzymes in comparison to the first generation
antiepileptic drugs [35]. In this study (fig.1), showed
level of estradiol after 28 days of treatment with
lamotrigine changed significantly when compared
with control group, this result is similar with[(36]
which proved that, healthy female patients took
lamotrigine and the combined oral contraceptive,
individually or as co-therapy for 130 days, recorded
slight effect of lamotrigine on estradiol level.
Lamotrigine drug reduces estradiol level [37]. While
[11] found that, healthy rats treated with lamotrigine
for different period caused a significant increase in
the level of estradiol.
Lamotrigine is considered traditional sodium
channelblocking antiepileptic drugs, is confirmed its
therapeutic effects by reacting with sodium channels
[38]. A large reduction of the high-voltage-activated
calcium currents produced by lamotrigine and slight
use-dependent inhibition of the sodium conductance
[39]. Sodium inward current, voltage-gatedcalcium
currents and the transient potassium outward current
affected by lamotrigine drug may cause potent
mechanisms to inhibit pathological irritation in
epilepsy and a possible advantage in treating
disturbances in bipolar disorder [40].
Conclusion
Treating of female albino rats with two doses of
lamotrigine drug for 28 days have a significant effect
on altering the level of most hematological,
biochemical parameters, ions, and estradiol level
included in this study, Further studies are necessary
to investigate the high doses and long-term effect of
this drug on healthy and epileptic rats.
References
[1] Biale, M.(2012). Why are antiepileptic drugs used
for nonepileptic conditions? Epilepsia, 53(7):2633.
[2] Leppik, I.E. (1994). Antiepileptic drugs in
development: prospects for the near future.
Epilepsia, 35 ( 4): 29-40.
[3] Leach, M.J.; Harden, C.M. and Millar, A.A.
(1986). Pharmacological studies of lamotrigine, a
novel potential antiepileptic drug, II: Neurochemical
studies on the mechanisms of action. Epilepsia, 27
(5): 490-497.
[4]Pellock, J.M. (1997). Lamotrigine. Journal of
Child Neurology, 12(1): S1-S1
[5] Cohen, A.F. et al. (1987). Lamotrigine, a new
anticonvulsant: pharmacokinetics in normal humans.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutic, 42(5): 535
541.
[6] EURAP Study Group. (2006). Seizure control and
treatment in pregnancy: observations from the
EURAP epilepsy pregnancy registry. Neurology,
66(3): 354360.
[7] Garnett, W.R. (1997). Lamotrigine:
pharmacokinetics. Journal of Child Neurology,
12(1): S1015.
[8] Doig, M.V. and Clare, R.A. (1991). Use of
thermospray liquid chromatography - mass
spectrometry to aid in the identification of urinary
metabolites of a novel antiepileptic drug, lamotrigine.
Journal of Chromatography, 554(1-2): 181189.
[9] Pickrell, W.O. et al. (2014). Trends in the first
antiepileptic drug prescribed for epilepsy between
2000 and 2010. Seizure, 23(1):7780.
[10] Abu-rish, E.Y.; Elhayek, Sh. Y.; Mohamed,
Y.S.; Hamad, I. and Bustanji, Y. (2017). Evaluation
of immunomodulatory effects of lamotrigine in
BALB/c mice. Acta Pharmaceutica, 67(4): 543555
[11] Al-taee, A.A. (2016). Histological and
Biochemical Study of Female Albino Rats (Rattus
rattus) Treated with Lamotrigine. International
Journal of PharmTechResearch,9(9): 321-329.
[12] Perez-Lloret, S.L.; De Mena,O.F.; Pieczanski,P.;
and Moncalvo. J.R. (2012). Bioequivalence of
Lamotrigine 50-mg Tablets in Healthy Male
Volunteers: A Randomized, Single-Dose,2-Period, 2-
Sequence Crossover Study. Arzneimittelforschung,
62(10):470-476.
[13] Milosheska, D. et al. (2016). Pharmacokinetics
of lamotrigine and its metabolite N-2-glucuronide:
Influence of polymorphism of UDP-
glucuronosyltransferases and drug transporters.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 82(2):399-
411
[14] Roste, L.S.et al.(2003). Gonadal morphology
and sex hormones in male and female Wistar rats
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science Vol. 24 (3) 2019
29
after long-term lamotrigine treatment. Seizure,12(8):
621627.
[15] Sidhu J, Job S, Singh S, and Philipson R.(2006).
The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
consequences of the co-administration of lamotrigine
and a combined oral contraceptive in healthy female
subjects. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,
61(2):191199.
[16] Shin, J.W.; Seol, I.C. and Son, C.G. (2010)
Interpretation of Animal Dose and Human Equivalent
Dose for Drug Development. The Journal of Korean
Oriental Medicine.31(3): 1-7.
[17] Peter, A. and Kellie, B. (2012). SPSS statistics: a
practical guide version 20. Cengage learning,
Australia.
[18] Landmark, C.J. (2008). Antiepileptic drugs in
non-epilepsy disorders: relations between
mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy. CNS
Drugs .22(1):2747.
[19] Hamer, H.M, et al. (2012). Prevalence,
utilization, and costs of antiepileptic drugs for
epilepsy in Germany a nationwide population-based
study in children and adults. Journal of Neurology,
259(11):23762384.
[20] Hsieh, L.P, and Huang, C.Y.(2011). Trends in
the use of antiepileptic drugs in Taiwan from 2003 to
2007: a population-based national health insurance
study. Epilepsy Research ,96(1-2):8188.
[21] Biton, V. (2006). Pharmacokinetics, toxicology
and safety of lamotrigine in epilepsy. Expert Opinion
Drug Metabolism Toxicology, 2(6): 1009 1018.
[22] Sinz, M. W, and Remmel, R. P.(1991). Isolation
and characterization of a novel quaternary
ammonium-linked glucuronide of lamotrigine. Drug
Metabolism Disposition,19(1): 149 153.
[23] Adeneye, A. A.; Ajagbonna, O. P.; Adeleke, T. I.
and Bello, S.O. (2006). Preliminary toxicity and
phytochemical studies of the stem bark aqueous
extract of Musanga cecropioides in rats. Journal of
Ethnopharmacology, 105(3):374379.
[24] Guyton, A. C. and Hall, J. E. (2000). Textbook
of Medical Physiology. 10th edn., Philadelphia:
Saunders: p 421
[25] Zuk, A.; Targosz-Korecka, M. and Szymonski,
M. (2011). Effect of selected drugs used in asthma
treatment on morphology and elastic properties of red
blood cells.International .Journal of Nanomedicine.
6: 249257.
[26] Betts, T. (1992). Clinical uses of lamotrigine.
Seizure. 1(1):3-6
[27] Shams El Dine, S.M. (2014). Possible effects of
lamotrigine on liver of Wistar rats exposed to
chemoconvulsion and Chronic Restraint model.
American Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience.
2(4): 50-55.
[28] Ziegler D. et al. (2009). Neuropathic pain in
diabetes, prediabetes and normal glucose tolerance:
the MONICA/KORA Augsburg Surveys S2 and S3.
Pain Medicine. 10(2): 393-400
[29] Day, A.; Mayne, P. and Mayne, P.D. (1994).
Clinical Chemistry in Diagnosis and Treatment. 6th
edn. London: Ahodder Arnold Publication:
[30] Johnston, D.E. (1999). Special considerations in
interpreting liver function tests. American Family
Physician . 59(8):2223-2230.
[31] Meldrum, B.S. (1994). Lamotrigine a novel
approach. Seizure. 3 (SupplA): 41-45.
[32] Fayad, M., Choueiri, R. and Mikati, M. (2000).
Potential hepatotoxicity of lamotrigine. Pediatric
Neurology. 22(1): 49-52.
[33] Paul, T. Giboney, M.D. (2005). Mildly elevated
liver transaminase levels in the Asymptomatic
Patient. American Family Physician. 71(6):1105-
1110.
[34] Ali, A. et al.(2003). Lamotrigine is not hepatoxic
in mice. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 35(4): 248-
249.
[35] McAuley, J.W. and Anderson, G.D. (2002).
Treatment of epilepsy in women of reproductive age,
pharmacokinetic considerations. Clinical Pharma-
cokinetic. 41(8):559579.
[36] Sidhu, J; Job, S.; Singh, S. and Philipson, R.
(2006). The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
consequences of the co-administration of lamotrigine
and a combined oral contraceptive in healthy female
subjects. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
61(2): 191199.
[37] Reimers, A. (2014) New antiepileptic drugs and
women. Seizure 23(8): 585-591.
[38] Niespodziany I, Leclère N, Vandenplas C,
Foerch P, and Wolff, C.(2013). Comparative study of
lacosamide and classical sodium channel blocking
antiepileptic drugs on sodium channel slow
inactivation. Journal of Neuroscience Research.
91(3):436443.
[39] Stefani, A.; Spadoni,F. and. Bernardi, G.(1997).
Differential Inhibition by Riluzole, Lamotrigine, and
Phenytoin of Sodium and Calcium Currents in
Cortical Neurons: Implications for Neuroprotective
Strategies. Experimental Neurology.147(1):115-122.
[40] Grunze, H.; von Wegerer, J.; Greene, R.W. and
Walden, J. (1998). Modulation of Calcium and
Potassium Currents by Lamotrigine.
Neuropsychobiology. 38(3): 131138.


Tikrit Journal of Pure Science Vol. 24 (3) 2019
30



16
37.14
28,21,14,7

  





            28,21,14,7

   
28

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Modulation of the immune system has recently been shown to be involved in the pharmacological effects of old antiepileptic drugs and in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. Therefore, the most recent guidelines for immunotoxicological evaluation of drugs were consulted to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of lamotrigine, a newer antiepileptic drug, in BALB/c mice. These included the in vivo effects of lamotrigine on delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response to sheep red blood cell (SRBC) antigens, hemagglutination titer assays and hematological changes. In vitro effects of lamotrigine on ConA-induced splenocyte proliferation and cytokine secretion were assessed. The results showed that lamotrigine treatment significantly increased the DTH response to SRBC in the mouse model of this study. This was accompanied by a significant increase in relative monocyte and neutrophil counts and in spleen cellularity. Lamotrigine significantly inhibited ConA-induced splenocyte proliferation in vitro and it significantly inhibited IL-2 and TNF-α secretion in ConA-stimulated splenocytes. In conclusion, the results demonstrated significant immunomodulatory effects of lamotrigine in BALB/c mice. These data could expand the understanding of lamotrigine-induced adverse reactions and its role in modulating the immune system in epilepsy.
Article
Full-text available
Since 1990, sixteen new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced. Most of these new AEDs are only insufficiently studied with respect to women-specific aspects such as endogenous sex hormones, hormonal contraception, pregnancy, breastfeeding, or menopause. This is concerning, because it has been shown for some of the new AEDs that these issues may have a clinically significant impact on their pharmacokinetics and seizure control. Also, new AEDs may exert effects like affecting hormone homeostasis, and pass over into breast milk. The best studied of the new AEDs are lamotrigine, levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine. Although gabapentin and pregabalin are even more frequently used (due to their therapeutic effects in nonepileptic conditions), these two drugs are surprisingly poorly studied. Little to nothing is known about zonisamide, retigabine/ezogabine, lacosamide, perampanel and the other new AEDs. Nevertheless, many small studies and case series have been published on new AEDs and women-specific aspects. This review gives an overview on what is known today.
Article
Aims: This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for quantitative evaluation of the influence of genetic variants in metabolic enzymes and transporters on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics while taking into account the influence of various clinical, biochemical and demographic factors. Methods: We included 100 patients with epilepsy on stable dosing with lamotrigine as mono or adjunctive therapy. Lamotrigine and lamotrigine N-2-glucuronide concentrations were determined in up to two plasma samples per patient. Patients were genotyped for UGT1A4, UGT2B7, ABCB1, and SLC22A1. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Prior knowledge from previous pharmacokinetic studies was incorporated to stabilize the modelling process. A parent-metabolite model was developed to get a more detailed view on the covariate effects on lamotrigine metabolism. Results: With a base model absorption rate (interindividual variability) was estimated at 1.96 h(-1) (72.8%), oral clearance at 2.32 L/h (41.4%) and distribution volume at 77.6 L (30.2%). Lamotrigine clearance was associated with genetic factors, patient's weight, renal function, smoking and co-treatment with enzyme inducing or inhibiting drugs. In patients with UGT2B7 -161TT genotype clearance was lower compared to GT and GG genotypes. Clearance was particularly high in patients with UGT2B7 372 GG genotype (compared to AA genotype it was 117%; 95% CI: 44.8-247% higher). Conclusions: Variability in lamotrigine pharmacokinetics is large and quantification of its sources may lead to more precise individual treatment. Genotyping for UGT2B7 may be useful in various clinical settings. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
To investigate changes in the choice of first anti-epileptic drug (AED) and co-prescription of folic acid after a new diagnosis of epilepsy. We searched anonymised electronic primary care records dating between 2000 and 2010 for patients with a new diagnosis of epilepsy and recorded the first AED prescribed and whether folic acid was co-prescribed. From 13.3 million patient years of primary care records, we identified 3714 patients with a new diagnosis of epilepsy (925 children and 649 women aged 14-45 years). Comparing first time AED prescriptions in 2000 and 2001 to those in 2009 and 2010 showed a significant decrease in the proportion of carbamazepine and phenytoin prescribed and a significant increase in the proportion of lamotrigine and levetiracetam prescribed. In women aged 14-45 years, and girls aged <18 there was a significant decrease in the proportion of sodium valproate prescribed. Women aged 14-45 years were significantly more likely to be co-prescribed folic acid with their first AED compared to all other patients (20% vs 3%, p-value<0.001). The proportion of folic acid co-prescribed with the first AED did not change significantly between 2000 and 2010. The changing trends in the first AED prescribed over the last decade, particularly in women of childbearing age, reflect published evidence in terms of AED efficacy, tolerability and safety.
Article
Many antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) exert their therapeutic activity by modifying the inactivation properties of voltage-gated sodium (Na(v) ) channels. Lacosamide is unique among AEDs in that it selectively enhances the slow inactivation component. Although numerous studies have investigated the effects of AEDs on Na(v) channel inactivation, a direct comparison of results cannot be made because of varying experimental conditions. In this study, the effects of different AEDs on Na(v) channel steady-state slow inactivation were investigated under identical experimental conditions using whole-cell patch-clamp in N1E-115 mouse neuroblastoma cells. All drugs were tested at 100 μM, and results were compared with those from time-matched control groups. Lacosamide significantly shifted the voltage dependence of Na(v) current (I(Na) ) slow inactivation toward more hyperpolarized potentials (by -33 ± 7 mV), whereas the maximal fraction of slow inactivated channels and the curve slope did not differ significantly. Neither SPM6953 (lacosamide inactive enantiomer), nor carbamazepine, nor zonisamide affected the voltage dependence of I(Na) slow inactivation, the maximal fraction of slow inactivated channels, or the curve slope. Phenytoin significantly increased the maximal fraction of slow inactivated channels (by 28% ± 9%) in a voltage-independent manner but did not affect the curve slope. Lamotrigine slightly increased the fraction of inactivated currents (by 15% ± 4%) and widened the range of the slow inactivation voltage dependence. Lamotrigine and rufinamide induced weak, but significant, shifts of I(Na) slow inactivation toward more depolarized potentials. The effects of lacosamide on Na(v) channel slow inactivation corroborate previous observations that lacosamide has a unique mode of action among AEDs that act on Na(v) channels. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Article
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used to treat various nonepileptic central nervous system (CNS) disorders, both in neurology and psychiatry. Most AEDs have multiple mechanisms of action (MOAs), which include modulation of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission, and alteration of voltage-gated ion channels or intracellular signaling pathways. These MOAs may explain the efficacy of AEDs in the treatment of bipolar disorder and neuropathic pain. Bipolar disorder and epilepsy have some common features, such as their episodic nature and associated kindling phenomena, which led to the regulatory approval and use of the AEDs carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) in the treatment of bipolar disorder. A major limitation for the development of drugs with improved mood-stabilizing activity is the lack of knowledge on the mechanism of treatment for bipolar disorder. In contrast to epilepsy, no animal models in bipolar disorder are universally accepted and no model is able to exhibit the characteristic mood swings. Although most AEDs have now been investigated for their mood-stabilizing effects, only three (e.g., VPA, CBZ, and LTG) demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients. This suggests that the mechanism of drug action in mood disorder and in epilepsy only partially overlaps. Peripheral nerve damage leads to the initiation of cellular and molecular changes in the nervous system resulting in ectopic, repetitive firing perceived as chronic pain. Epileptic seizures are also characterized by hyperexcitability of neurons in the brain. The spontaneous electrogenesis in neuropathic pain has similarities to that of epilepsy. Alteration in sodium channels expression suggests that the mechanism underlying epileptic hyperexcitability may be similar to those underlying neuropathic pain. The AEDs gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB) have become the mainstay of treatment for various neuropathic pain syndromes, owing to their ability to inhibit neuronal hyperactivity along the pain pathways. One explanation for how GBP and PGB relieve neuropathic pain is that they bind selectively to the Ca(+2) -channel subunit α2-δ in muscle tissue and brain. With 16 new AEDs having entered the market since 1990 the antiepileptic market is crowded. Consequently, epilepsy alone is not attractive in 2012 to the pharmaceutical industry, even though the clinical needs of refractory epilepsy remain unmet. Due to this situation, the future design of new AEDs must also include a potential in nonepileptic CNS disorders, such as bipolar disorder and neuropathic pain. The global market size of each of these two indications is similar to that of epilepsy, whereas they both currently have fewer approved drugs for treatment than epilepsy. Therefore, a new AED with additional approved indications in bipolar disorder and neuropathic pain might have a potential market size three times larger than that of epilepsy alone.
Article
Unlabelled: OBEJCTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of two 50-mg lamotrigine dispersible tablet formulations (Epilepax®, Ivax-TEVA Argentina Laboratories, Argentina, as a test formulation, and Lamictal®, GlaxoSmithKline, UK, as a reference formulation) in 24 healthy male volunteers. Material and methods: This study was a randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover design that was open for subjects and investigators, but blind for the bioanalytical lab. Serum samples were obtained over a 120-h interval. A 9-day wash-out period was allowed between treatments. The concentrations of lamotrigine were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography followed by ultraviolet-visible detection. Lamotrigine time-concentrations curves were obtained and the following pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated: AUC0-t, AUC0-inf and Cmax. Bioequivalence was declared if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the mean test/reference ratios for AUC0-t, AUC0-inf and Cmax were within 80.00-125.00%. Results: The geometric mean and respective 90% CI of test/reference percent ratios were 100.83% (92.53-107.88%) for AUC0-t, 99.91% (93.79-108.40%) for AUC0-inf, and 95.62% (90.91-100.57%) for Cmax. No serious adverse events were observed. 1 patient reported a mild rash following the administration of each formulation. Conclusion: This single dose study found that the test and reference products met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in this sample of fasting healthy volunteers. These results suggest that bioequivalence studies evaluating 50-mg doses of Lamotrigine are feasible and recommended, since such doses may minimize the risk of severe rash or Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. This study was registered at the Argentinean Clinical Trials National Registry (www.anmat.gov.ar), No 1666/2008.
Article
Lamotrigine (LTG) [3,5‐diamino‐6‐(2,3‐dichlorophenyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine] is a novel anticonvulsant chemically unrelated to current antiepileptic drugs and with a pharmacological profile similar to that of phenytoin. The effect of LTG has been compared with that of phenytoin, on the release of endogenous amino acids and radiolabelled acetylcholine evoked by veratrine or potassium, from slices of rat cerebral cortex in vitro. Both veratrine and potassium evoked a marked release of glutamate and γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA), with a more moderate release of aspartate. LTG inhibited veratrine‐evoked release of glutamate and aspartate, with ED 50 values of 21 μ M for both amino acids, but LTG was less potent in the inhibition of GABA release (ED 50 = 44 μ M ). At concentrations up to 300 μ M , LTG had no effect on potassium‐evoked amino acid release or on spontaneous release. Also, LTG was some five times less potent in the inhibition of veratrine‐evoked [ ³ H]acetylcholine release (ED 50 = 100 μ M ) than in glutamate or aspartate release. The total lack of effect of LTG on potassium‐evoked release and the potent effect on veratrine‐evoked release (at concentrations found in rat brain after anticonvulsant doses) strongly suggest that LTG acts at voltage‐sensitive sodium channels to stabilise neuronal membranes and inhibit transmitter release, principally glutamate. The role of glutamate in the aetiology of epilepsy is discussed. RESUME La lamotrigine (3,5‐diamino‐6‐{2,3‐dichlorophenyl}‐1,2,4 triazine) (LTG) est un nouvel anticonvulsivant, de structure originale par rapport aux medications antiépileptiques connues, avec un profil pharmacologique proche de celui de la phénytoïne. Nous avons comparé l'effet de la LTG et de la phénytoïne sur la libération d'acides aminés endogènes et de ³ H‐acétylcholine entraǐnée par la vératrine ou le potassium, sur des lames de cortex cérébral de rat in vitro. La vératrine et le potassium ont entraǐné une nette libération de glutamate et de GABA, une libération plus faible d'aspartate. La LTG inhibe la libération de glutamate et d'aspartate post‐vératrine avec une DE‐50 de 21 μ M pour les 2 acides aminés, mais s'est montrée moins active dans l'inhibition de la libération du GABA (DE‐50 = 44 μ M ). A toutes les concentrations, jusqu'à 300 μ M , la LTG n'a pas eu d'effet sur la libération spontanée ou induite par le potassium. La LTG s'est également montrée environ 5 fois moins efficace dans l'inhibition de la libération de ³ H acétylcholine après vératrine (DE‐50 = 100 μ M ) que dans celle du glutamate ou de l'aspartate. L'absence totale d'effet de la LTG sur la libération après potassium et l'effet important sur la libération après véralrine (à des concentrations cérébrales anticonvulsivantes chez le rat) suggèrent que la LTG agit au niveau des canaux sodium sensibles au voltage, en stabilisant les membranes neuronales et en inhibant la libération des transmetteurs, principalement du glutamate. Le rǒle du glutamate dans l'étiologie de l'épilepsie est discuté. RESUMEN La lamotrigina [LTG; 3,5‐diamino‐6‐(2,3‐diclorofenil)‐1,2,4‐triazina es un anticonvulsivante nuevo que no está relacionado quimicamente a las medicaciones antiepilépticas usuales y que tiene un perfil farmacológico semejante a la fenitoína. El efecto de la LTG ha sido comparado con la fenitoína, en su capacidad de liberar aminoácidos endógenos y acetilcolina radiomarcada, liberación evocada por la veratrina o el potasio en secciones de la corteza cerebral de la rata in vitro. Ambos compuestos, la veratrina y el potasio, evocaron una considerable liberación de glutamato y GABA y una más moderada liberación de aspartato. La LTG inhibió la liberación de glutamato y aspartato evocada por la veratrina con ED 50 s de 21 μ M para ambos aminoácidos pero fue menos potente en la inhibición de la liberación de GABA (ED 50 = 44 μμ M ). En concentraciones de hasta 300 μ M , la LTG no produjo ningún efecto en la liberación de aminoácidos producida por el potasio ni en la liberación espontánea. También la LTG fue 5 veces menos potente en la liberación de la acetilcolina producida por la veratrina [ ³ H] (ED 50 = 100 μ M ) que en la liberación de glutamato o aspartato. La falta total de efecto de la LTG sobre la liberación evocada por el potasio y el efecto potente sobre la liberación evocada por la veratrina (en concentraciones encontradas en el cerebro de la rata después de dosis anticonvulsivas) firmemente sugiere que la LTG actúa sobre los potenciales de sodio voltaje‐sensibles estabilizando las membranas neuronales e inhibiendo la liberación de trasmisores, principalmente el glutamato. SE discute el papel que juega el glutamato en la etiología de la epilepsia. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG Lamotrigin (LTG; 3,5‐Diamino‐6‐(2,3‐Dichlorphenyl‐1,2,4‐Triazin) ist ein neues Antikonvulsivum, das chemisch keine Beziehung zu den bekannten Antiepileptika aufweist. Sein pharmakologisches Profil ähnelt dem Phenytoin. Die Wirkung des LTG wurde mit Phenytoin hinsichtlich der Freisetzung endogener Aminosäuren und radioaktiv markierten Acetylcholins durch Veratrin oder Kalium aus Schnitten des zerebralen Kortex der Ratte in vitro verglichen. Sowohl Veratrin als auch Kalium verursachen eine deutliche Freisetzung von Glutamat und Gaba zusammen mit einer mäßigen Freisetzung von Aspartat. LTG inhi‐biert die durch Veratrin ausgelöste Freisetzung von Glutamat und Aspartat mit einer ED 50 von 21 μmol für beide Aminosäuren. LTG war aber weniger wirkungsvoll, die Gaba‐Freisetzung (ED 50 = 44 μmol) zu inhibieren. In Konzentration bis 300 μmol hatte LTG keine Wirkung auf die Kalium‐evozierte Freisetzung von Aminosäuren oder auf die spontane Freisetzung. Außerdem war LTG etwa fünfmal weniger wirkungsvoll, die ³ H Acethylcholin Freisetzung (ED 50 = 100 μmol) zu inhibieren, als die Glutamat‐ oder Aspartat‐Freisetzung. Die völlige Wirkungs losigkeit von LTG auf die Kalium‐evozierte Freisetzung und die deutliche Wirkung auf die Veratrin‐evozierte Freisetzung (bei den Konzentrationen, die im Rattengehirn nach antikonvulsiven Dosen gefunden werden) läßt deutlich vermuten, daß LTG seine Wirkung auf die spannungssensiblen Natriumkanäle entfaltet, um neuronale Membrane zu stabilisieren und die Transmitter‐freisetzung, besonders des Glutamats zu verhindern. Die Rolle des Glutamats in der ätiologie der Epilepsie wird diskutiert.