Content uploaded by Annelize Van Niekerk
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Annelize Van Niekerk on Apr 12, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Contemporary Management
Volume 20 Issue 1
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 1
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Open access under the terms and conditions of the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of
employee well-being during change
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35683/jcman1004.186
DEDRIEKA MAGDALENA NEL
Department of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, University of South Africa,
South Africa
Email: d@extrico.co.za
ANNELIZE VAN NIEKERK*
Department of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, University of South Africa,
South Africa
Email: vnieka2@unisa.ac.za
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-5708
*corresponding author
ABSTRACT
Purpose of the study: Organisational change is inevitable within the increasingly volatile and complex world
of work; this is a reality that no organisation or employee can escape. It is well known that change failure may
have a profoundly negative impact on employees’ well-being. Many previous studies exploring the impact of
organisational change on employee well-being adopted a quantitative approach –
hence the need for a
qualitative study that focuses on the lived experiences of change recipients.
Design/methodology/approach: This qualitative, hermeneutic phenomenological study explored employees’
lived experiences of organisational change and its impact on their well-being. This qualitative study used
purposive sampling, where semi-structured interviews yielded rich data.
Findings: Organisational change comprises both personal and professional ill-being and well-being descriptors.
Those affected by restructuring and system change – and who ‘survive’ it – deal with mixed emotions, as they
not only have to cope with its burden on themselves, but also on those working with them.
Recommendations/value: The subsequent negative impact this has on employee well-being can, however, be
moderated by creating an inclusive, safe organisational support environment in which effective communication
channels allow the voices of employees and management to influence the change management process, as
well as its outcomes for organisational strategy and goals
Managerial implications: Management should understand the social context within which change occurs and
how it impacts on employee well-being. Organisational change should be informed contextually to ensure a
systematic and inclusive approach, emphasising the importance of communication.
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 2
Keywords
Communication; Content analysis; Employee well-being; Ill-being; Interpretivist paradigm; Multidimensional;
Organisational change; Qualitative study; Semi-structured interviews; Survivor syndrome
JEL Classification: M12, M50
1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The world of work is shaped by trends such as technological advances, environmental
emergencies and the global economy (Simuth, 2017). With continuous volatility, uncertainty,
complexity and ambiguity in the world of work (Malatjie, 2019), organisations must adapt
quickly to survive (Crosina & Pratt, 2019). Consequently, organisational change is inevitable
(Malatjie, 2019), a reality that not one organisation or employee can escape (Hay et al., 2020).
Yet, it is well known that organisational change, if not managed effectively, can have a
profoundly negative impact on employees’ well-being (Nielsen et al., 2020), leading to
insecurity and uncertainty, increased anxiety and stress levels, all of which result in reduced
organisational growth and productivity and, ultimately, change failure.
Many previous studies focused on the impact of organisational change on objective measures
of organisational change initiatives by means of productivity and result indicators (Franco et
al., 2015; De Jong et al., 2016; Rafferty & Jimmieson, 2017; Jacobs & Keegan, 2018).
However, over the last few years, numerous researchers have expressed the urgent need to
explore further the subjective lived experiences of employees and the impact of change on
their well-being (Franco et al., 2015; De Jong et al., 2016; Rafferty & Jimmieson, 2017; Jacobs
& Keegan, 2018). While organisational change clearly has an impact on employee well-being,
the subjective perceptions of employees in this respect are still unclear (Rafferty & Jimmieson,
2017). This raises the following question: What are employees’ lived experiences of
organisational change and its impact on their well-being? Hence the need for this qualitative
study to gain an in-depth understanding of employees’ lived experiences of the impact of
organisational change on their well-being. Another objective of the study was to develop a
conceptual framework (Figure 1) outlining these experiences, which will contribute to the
literature and provide a better understanding of “the active roles that change recipients play in
organisational change events” (Oreg et al., 2018:65) towards assisting organisations in better
managing change initiatives directed at enhancing employee well-being.
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 3
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
This section presents a review of literature conceptualising organisational change and well-
being. It will conclude with a review of how organisational change impacts employee well-
being.
2.1 Organisational change
Generally, change refers to creating something different (Brijball-Parumasur, 2013). Similarly,
in the organisational context, change refers to changing the prevailing conditions in an
organisation from one state to another and it often relates to structural and/or process-related
changes (Fløvik et al., 2019). Over the years, numerous change theories have been
developed and these have informed change initiatives in organisations. Such theories include
Kurt Lewin’s (1947) classic change model, Mintzberg’s (2003) change model, the system
learning concept of Senge (1990), Kotter’s (1996) model of change and the transformational
versus transactional models of Hargrove (2003). In organisations, the aim of the change agent
is to change the current status quo by communicating the newly required state and ensuring
it is implemented successfully. This requires taking employees out of their comfort zones and
getting them to embrace the change (Maharaj & Pooe, 2021).
Inevitably, change results in considerable uncertainty, fear and anxiety among employees for
numerous reasons, which could include change agents’ poorly executing their roles, flawed
change management plans and employees’ possibly losing their employment (Kazmi &
Naaranoja, 2013; Maharaj & Pooe, 2021). This necessitates a better understanding of the
interaction between the organisational change context, the change process and the impact of
organisational change on employee well-being (Biron & Karanika-Murray, 2015; Nikolova et
al., 2016; Harney et al., 2018).
2.2 Well-being
Early perspectives on well-being are well represented in the works of scholars, such as
Maslow’s self-actualisation, Rogers’s optimally functional person, Frankl’s will to meaning,
Antonovsky’s salutogenic characteristics, Diener’s subjective well-being and Veenhoven’s
equation of well-being with happiness and quality of life, to name but a few (Wissing, 2020).
Research distinguishes between general well-being and employee well-being since the work
context can be quite different from general life situations (Zheng et al., 2015; Jarden et al.,
2021) – all of which are important to employees. “Employee well-being” is defined as “the
entire quality of an employee’s experience and functioning at the workplace” (Grant et al.,
2007:52). Similarly, Kaplan et al. (2017:4) defined employee well-being as “the sum of a
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 4
person’s emotional experiences and the subjective evaluations of their work and life
situations”. According to Grant et al. (2007), employee well-being may be best understood in
terms of the three core dimensions of happiness, health and relationships. However, to create
a flourishing positive institution in which employee well-being is key, Rothmann (2020) focuses
on the importance of emotional well-being and social well-being. Emotional well-being
includes cognitive components, which indicate the degree to which “we perceive our wants to
be met”, and affective components, which consider the extent “to which our needs are
satisfied” (Rothmann, 2020:272). Social well-being is aligned with relationships (Grant et al.,
2007), which include our experience of social integration, social acceptance, social
contribution, social actualisation and social coherence (Keyes, 2005; Rothmann, 2020).
2.3 Impact of organisational change on employee well-being
Change recipients may experience organisational change as an opportunity to gain or as a
potential risk of loss, with either good or bad outcomes (McKinley & Scherer, 2000 & Fløvik et
al., 2019). Many previous studies indicate that organisational change has a predominantly
negative impact on employees’ well-being (Westgaard & Winkel, 2011; Burke et al., 2015; De
Jong et al., 2016; Koukoulaki et al., 2017; Harney et al., 2018; Otto et al., 2018). Such
experiences are mostly due to an overpowering sense of uncertainty, which subsequently
results in employees' viewing organisational change initiatives in a negative light (Armstrong-
Stassen & Schlosser, 2008; Köper & Richter, 2014; Pahkin et al., 2014; Gupta, 2016; Nikolova
et al., 2016; Fløvik et al., 2019; Malatjie, 2019). While organisational change generally has an
adverse impact on employees, Fløvik et al. (2019) found that the adverse impact decreased
as time passed. Loretto et al. (2010) found that change will not necessarily have a negative
impact on change recipients and, occasionally, a positive impact might be expected. Wiezer
et al. (2011) agree with Loretto et al. (2010) that organisational change does not adversely
impact all employees and that some employees may regard organisational change as positive,
as it has the potential to improve chances of securing better positions in the organisation and
enables employees to influence the future state of the organisation positively (Wiezer et al.,
2011). Thus, although organisational change is generally experienced as negative, employees
also retain a sense of hope and expectation that the outcome of a change process and/or
initiative may lead to increased organisational success (Hay et al., 2020).
The literature also indicates that all employees are either directly or indirectly affected by
change initiatives such as restructuring, thus leaving no one exempt (Burke et al., 2015;
Koukoulaki et al., 2017). Notably, organisational change poses a threat to employees’ well-
being (Kaltianen et al., 2020), with significant consequences for all employees (Winslow et al.,
2017), the organisation in question and the broader economy (Kaplan et al., 2017). An
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 5
example would be how employees of organisational change experience a form of
organisational trauma that manifests as reduced organisational commitment, poor job
satisfaction, low morale and a lack of trust (Vermeulen & Wiesner, 2000; Nielsen et al., 2020).
As such, it is of the utmost importance that organisations pay attention to promoting employee
well-being to ensure employees are capable of performing their roles in line with organisational
strategy (Diener et al., 2017).
Ultimately, although change may be unavoidable, the adverse impact of change on employee
well-being can be moderated (Day et al., 2017). Researchers have considered the importance
of communication, employee participation and organisational support in organisational change
contexts (Westgaard & Winkel, 2011; Wiezer et al., 2011; Van Den Heuvel et al., 2013;
Erciyes, 2019). Franco et al. (2015) suggested that the presence of trust, transparency and
care may positively affect employee well-being. Dimitrova (2019) found that trust is a key
requirement for the successful implementation of change initiatives and according to Rahman
et al. (2020), both organisational support and organisational empowerment are positively
associated with employee well-being. However, existing research seems to have largely
overlooked the impact of organisational change on the lived experiences of employees with
the aim of providing a framework that could assist in the process of managing change
initiatives to enhance employee well-being.
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research approach
The researchers in this study followed a qualitative approach (Salkind, 2018) underpinned by
the interpretive research paradigm (O’Neil & Koekemoer, 2016). They used an inductive
research approach (Newman et al., 1998) by providing rich information (Featherston, 2008)
about the descriptions of employees’ lived experiences. Furthermore, they adopted a
hermeneutic phenomenological strategy to gain an in-depth understanding of the
organisational change context and the impact it has on employee well-being by using rich and
descriptive language (Kafle, 2011).
The research was conducted within the South African workplace context with the primary focus
on employees involved in organisations that implemented restructuring and system change
processes. The restructuring involved changes to the existing structure of the organisation
(McKinley & Scherer, 2000), and the system change processes included the updating and
renewing of systems (Werner, 2016).
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 6
3.2 Selection of participants
The study included participants from numerous organisations who have been exposed to and
experienced organisational change initiatives, such as leadership changes, policy and
strategic changes, retrenchments and/or restructuring in the South African workplace context.
Therefore, it was not possible to determine the population size. The researchers used
purposive sampling to identify information-rich cases (Kafle, 2011). This involved the
identification and selection of six participants who were well-versed in the phenomenon being
studied, namely organisational change settings, which included restructuring and system
change processes (Etikan et al., 2016) to gain an in-depth understanding of the phenomenon
and to enable the development of a framework (Benoot et al., 2016). A brief demographic
overview of the participants is provided in Table 1. Most (67%) of the participants were female,
and 33 percent were male. While 67 percent reported having a university degree, 34 percent
had a high school certificate or college diploma. One-third of the participants reported their
roles were best described as support, another third as professional or technical, and the last
third as managerial. All the participants were exposed to a combination of change initiatives.
All participants were exposed to policy and strategic changes, while 67 percent of the
participants were exposed specifically to leadership changes and 33 percent to system and
process changes. Eighty-three percent were part of the restructuring, and 83 percent of the
participants reported having been exposed to a retrenchment process. The sample size of six
participants was deemed sufficient when a point of data saturation was achieved (Guest et al.,
2006) and no new information, codes and themes emerged (Guest et al., 2006; Fusch & Ness,
2015).
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 7
Table 1: Sample demographics
Demographics %
Gender
Female 67%
Male 33%
Education
High school certificate 17%
Some college diploma 17%
BCom, BSc, or other university degree 50%
Graduate degree 17%
Nature of position
Support 33%
Professional/Technical 33%
Manager 33%
Nature of change exposed to
Leadership changes 67%
Policy and strategic changes 100%
System and process changes 33%
Restructuring 83%
Retrenchments 83%
Source: Authors compilation.
3.3 Data collection
The data were obtained through semi-structured interviews, which enabled the researchers to
gain an in-depth understanding of employees’ lived experiences of organisational change and
the impact on their well-being (Kafle, 2011). An interview guide was prepared and used to
guide the interviews (Bryman & Bell, 2014). The following questions were asked. What is your
understanding of what constitutes well-being in the workplace? What is your understanding of
organisational change? Describe how organisational change has impacted or is currently
impacting your well-being in the workplace. What recommendations would you make to the
organisation as to how the organisation may improve your experience of organisational
change so that it impacts more positively on your well-being? By applying techniques such as
reflection, paraphrasing, summarising and clarifying, the researchers were able to encourage
the participants to elaborate on their lived experiences (Bryman & Bell, 2014).
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 8
Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and the interviews were digitally
recorded and transcribed verbatim by the researchers. The reliability was checked by reading
the transcriptions while listening to the recordings (Terre Blanche & Kelly, 1999). These
transcriptions were anonymised by allocating pseudonyms to each participant.
3.4 Data analysis
The process included collecting suitable data, whereafter the researchers engaged in the
process of making sense of the data (Elo et al., 2014). Engaging with the data in this way
familiarised the researchers with the body of material while classifying the data into smaller,
more manageable items for analysis (words or themes) (Elo & Kyngäs, 2008). These words
or themes were added to the text as notes and headings while the researchers read the
interview transcripts. The headings were then transferred onto a coding sheet. Categories
were generated to describe the research phenomenon by grouping the headings together
based on their similarity and relatedness. The researchers used a colour-coding system by
assigning different colours to different groups. This process was followed repeatedly to make
the necessary adjustments and refinements that led to the emergence of overarching themes.
Each of the themes was represented by several words and short phrases that served as sub-
themes. This process enabled the researchers to gain an in-depth understanding of the
participants’ perspective regarding the impact of organisational change on their well-being and
to report on these by using content-related categories to describe the phenomenon.
3.5 Measures of trustworthiness
Gaya and Smith (2016) propose that credibility, transferability and dependability are
analogous to the concepts of reliability and validity used in quantitative approaches. In this
study, credibility was ensured by transcribing the audio recordings verbatim and using
representative verbatim quotations to report the findings (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).
Therefore, the data reported in the findings were representative of the participants’ true voices.
Transferability was addressed with purposive sampling, providing a detailed description of the
research context and using appropriate quotations (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).
Dependability was ensured by providing a detailed account and description of the research
process, including the data collection, data analysis and data interpretation, and by reporting
on the findings using appropriate quotations (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).
3.6 Ethical considerations
Ethical clearance was obtained from the appropriate research ethics review committee. All
participants were required to sign an informed consent before the interviews commenced. The
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 9
researchers also took the necessary steps to ensure all participants’ anonymity and
confidentiality, for example, by using pseudonyms and ensuring all data were securely stored.
4. RESEARCH FINDINGS
The findings of this study are based on the sample material, that is, verbatim transcripts of the
interviews that were conducted with six participants to gain a deeper understanding of their
subjectively lived experiences of how their well-being is influenced within organisational
change contexts. A further objective of this study was to develop a basic framework (see figure
1 below) that can act as a guide to enable organisations to manage change initiatives so that
suitable consideration is given to how employee well-being can be better protected. Four
prominent themes emerged from the interview data, namely (1) well-being descriptors, (2) ill-
being descriptors, (3) employee expectations and (4) survival. The comments from the
participants (noted as Participant 1, Participant 2, etc.) are interspersed with the reporting of
the findings.
Theme 1: Well-being descriptors
As illustrated below, well-being played a significant role in the way that the participants
experienced organisational change and it remained a central concept throughout the
interviews. Well-being was found to be a multidimensional concept (Marsh et al., 2020;
Ruggeri et al., 2020) that considers the “whole person” (Butler et al., 2019; Lee, 2022). For
instance, the participants stated that well-being included physical, mental and emotional well-
being:
I think there are lots of elements to well-being – there is your physical well-being …
mental well-being (Participant 3).
… well-being in the workplace would be like a healthy working environment … like
emotional and like mental … (Participant 4).
The participants perceived that a genuine sense of belonging enables them to overcome
obstacles, grow and excel in their work and engage with organisations. These experiences
closely resemble eudaimonic well-being, that is, practising and acting with virtue (Athota,
2017) to realise optimum human potential (Ryan & Deci, 2001). The specific responses
included the following:
… as a human being, of where I belong and why I can add value (Participant 1).
… that you feel valued by your employer. That there is space for you to grow
(Participant 2).
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 10
Feeling as if there are resources available (Participant 3).
It was found that happiness underpins well-being in the workplace and that employees who
feel happy in the workplace tend to feel more energetic, more productive, more engaged and,
ultimately, more committed to the objectives, such as the change initiative. These positive
feelings are then an incentive to increase work performance (Kidd, 2008; Zito et al., 2019)
and, hence, organisational profitability (Awada & Ismail, 2019). Such experiences are closely
aligned with hedonic well-being, which has a strong pleasure orientation (Athota, 2017). The
participants expressed the following views:
I think it is massively important, um, because I think if you are in an environment where
you feel happy and healthy and your well-being is taken seriously, then you are likely
to want to spend time there (Participant 3).
I think if people, uhm, are happy and it's a good environment, then it'll reflect in their
work. Um, people would go above and beyond (Participant 4).
… you'll be very positive and, uh, give much more inputs (Participant 5).
… everyone participates ... It makes everyone happier (Participant 5).
That you can just give your best for the company, you will walk the extra mile for the
company (Participant 6).
Theme 2: Ill-being descriptors
The findings of the study support the literature, which indicates that organisational change has
a generally negative impact on employee well-being (Day et al., 2017; Rafferty & Jimmieson,
2017), which manifests as ill-being. The experiences of ill-being manifested in the participants’
personal and professional lives and affected them financially, emotionally and psychologically
(Schiro & Baker, 2009; Lee, 2022).
The participants specifically referred to the impact of organisational change and how their
experiences had manifested in their personal lives as a major concern, especially the
concomitant inability to plan for the future. The uncertainty associated with the organisational
change was a major contributing factor to ill-being, flamed by feelings of nervousness –
perhaps even anxiety – as a result of the lack of security and, to some extent, the urge to flee
(Smollan, 2017). This had a negative impact on employee well-being (Burke et al., 2015;
Harney et al., 2018). The participants’ responses included the following:
I'm very uncertain about future prospects (Participant 1).
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 11
It kind of leaves you, you know, like on shifting ground, you're not really sure of what
to do, how to do your job. You know, it messes a little bit with the security of the
employees (Participant 2).
There was so much insecurity and so that makes you really nervous (Participant 3).
I think it just it impacts on you emotionally and mentally because you never know what's
going to happen (Participant 4).
But, not knowing, I mean you just can't run away (Participant 5).
The participants also perceived professional ill-being as a dimension of subjective well-being,
which combines the properties of physical, mental and emotional ill-being and alludes to
resistance to change. The participants stated that they tended to disengage from their work,
and productivity appeared to have stagnated or decreased. The specific responses included
the following:
You don't work as hard as you used to and it's not because you don't want to, it kind
of just happens? (Participant 2).
In that negative space you feel like you only want to do what your contract says.
Nothing more, nothing less (Participant 2).
… just very uninterested in the work … you feel like you just have no interest in your
work (Participant 4).
He’ll just sit in a meeting and listen to everything and he won't give any input at the
meeting (Participant 5).
Theme 3: Employee expectations
Employees’ well-being is affected by organisational changes and is informed by not only the
organisation’s expectations of the employee (Lee, 2022) but also the employees’
expectations. Disregarding employees’ expectations may have an adverse impact on their
well-being (Lundmark et al., 2022). Communication is often a key expectation of employees
and is crucial during change processes. As illustrated below, poor communication was cited
by participants as a significant contributor towards understanding how ill-being manifests for
employees in organisational change contexts (Smollan, 2017). The findings relating to
employee expectations indicated that the participants had not received any communication
from the organisation in some instances or that communication was perceived to be
inadequate in other cases; in certain instances, employees even believed that the organisation
was not being transparent or open in what was communicated. Consequently, participants
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 12
alluded to the fact that the communication failed to meet their expectations. They stated the
following:
If they can be open and transparent about the plans for the future (Participant 1).
I feel a lot more comfortable going to my manager and asking him because he's being
open to us. What you give is what you get (Participant 2).
… they could have handled their communication a lot better (Participant 2).
… some line of communication would have been nice (Participant 4).
… open the lines of communication. Uhm, give us more information as to why they
were restructuring or what was this process was in aid of (Participant 4).
The participants also saw consultation as a key consideration. It was clearly important for the
participants to feel included and heard before decisions were taken. For instance, the
participants stated the following:
If there's an issue, let them know about it, deal with it and get on with life (Participant
2).
... it's so frustrating when you've got questions and they're not being addressed ...
Instead of someone actually looking to listening to you (Participant 3).
… more open communication and maybe ask us for our input into the whole process
or if you have any ideas or you know things that they could have done differently in in
how they carried out the process (Participant 4).
I think it's very important that you get input of everyone involved (Participant 5).
Just speak to them before you take that decision (Participant 6).
Theme 4: Survival
It was clear that all the participants – both those who survived the change or those who saw
themselves as victims of it – felt that their mental health had been affected by the
organisational change context (Schiro & Baker, 2009; Simuth, 2017; Fløvik et al., 2019). The
participants’ expressions indicated that they were/had been carrying the burden of the impact
of organisational change on their well-being, as well as the burden they experienced on behalf
of the victims who had not survived the organisational change initiatives. The participants
found it exceedingly difficult to cope with organisational change and to survive, even long after
the aftermath of the change (Kidd, 2008; Dlouhy & Casper, 2020). Some participants made
these observations:
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 13
It’s still impacting me. It’s now been two years since we've lost the majority of the team
members we had (Participant 1).
There's no ways to be unaffected when they're such big change happening around you
(Participant 3).
That's really hard. ’Cause you get used to the people you get very used to your
management. You get used to everything (Participant 6).
The participants reported mixed emotions following the organisational change event. Mixed
emotions refer to the intense and relatively enduring positive and negative feelings that
employees experience in relation to the change event (Zoogah & Beurgre, 2013). Participant
3 stated the following:
But in my team there were only two of us, so we were watching this change almost
from the outside. Um, and it was, uh, it was. I don't know if it. I don't know. It was very
confusing position to be in because you're incredibly grateful that you your job is
secure. Where's all your colleagues are facing massive employment insecurity, but in
the same breath you your feeling for your colleagues and your heart is breaking for
them and the trauma that they’re going through (Participant 3).
5. DISCUSSION
The four themes that emerged from the empirical part of the study (i.e. well-being descriptors,
ill-being descriptors, employee expectations and survival), together with the literature
reviewed, provide a better understanding of the participants’ lived experiences of
organisational change and its impact on employee well-being. Figure 1 depicts these findings
as a conceptual framework.
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 14
Figure 1: Conceptual framework for managing change initiatives directed at enhancing
employee well-being
Source: Compiled by authors
Organisational change is a constant in the world of work, stretching employees and taking
them out of their comfort zone as it changes the status quo, often resulting in feelings of
uncertainty, fear and anxiety, all of which directly affect an employee’s well-being (Harney et
al., 2018; Maharaj & Pooe, 2021). The changes may assume the form of structural and/or
process-related changes within an organisation (Fløvik et al., 2019).
The results of this study illustrate the significant role that well-being plays in how the
participants experienced organisational change and interacted with it. Well-being was found
to be a multidimensional concept (Marsh et al., 2020; Ruggeri et al., 2020) that considers the
“whole person” and includes physical, mental and emotional well-being (Grant et al., 2007;
Butler et al., 2019; Lee, 2022). Aligned with the work on the emotional and social well-being
of Rothmann (2020), participants emphasised the important role that a sense of belonging
plays in enabling employees to deal with the challenges arising from the change initiatives
through positive experiences of social integration, social acceptance, social contribution,
social actualisation and social coherence. These findings also align well with eudaimonic well-
being, that is, practising and acting with virtue to function optimally (Athota, 2017; Wissing,
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 15
2020). Also, in line with the hedonic well-being perspective, it was evident from the findings
how happiness (pleasure orientation) results in increased work engagement, employee
commitment to meet the objectives of the change initiative and overall better performance,
productivity and organisational profitability (Awada & Ismail, 2019; Zito et al., 2019; Wissing,
2020).
On the other hand, ill-being also seems to play a vital role, considering the longstanding
perception that organisational change is always negative and affects an employee’s life both
personally (emotionally, economically and psychologically) and professionally (lack of job
security, uncertainty, disengagement and poor performance) (Rafferty & Jimmieson, 2017;
Harney et al., 2018; Lee, 2022). Ill-being can therefore prove to be a major source of
resistance to change, resulting in the change initiative’s failing or not meeting its set objectives
(Smollan, 2017).
Employee expectations emerged as an important point of consideration for organisations
during any organisational change initiative, yet it is often ignored or dealt with as an
afterthought (Smollan, 2017; Lee, 2022). It is clear how change agents seem to focus
predominantly on the organisation’s expectations and, as a result, decisions are made that
affect not only the employees’ well-being but also the success of the change initiative
(Lundmark et al., 2022). Management of effective communication is key as it will provide
employees with the opportunity to consult with management so that the employees have a
platform to express their concerns, share their knowledge and give inputs before important
decisions are made that will affect them directly. It also imparts feelings of trust in the
employees when such communication occurs promptly, comprehensively and transparently
(Zwikael & Smyrk, 2015; Van Niekerk, 2017).
Living through a change initiative seems to be a fight for survival that coincides with many
mixed emotions, both positive and negative (Zoogah & Beugre, 2013). No person’s well-being
is left unscathed by the burden that they are required to carry, whether it is because they feel
guilty that they survived the restructuring/change while their colleagues did not or merely from
witnessing the impact of the change on the well-being of others or on themselves (Kidd, 2008;
Schiro & Baker, 2009; Simuth, 2017; Fløvik et al., 2019; Dlouhy & Casper, 2020).
Organisational support becomes an important enabler for organisational change initiatives to
succeed as it is key to ensuring healthy, engaged employees who are vital in executing the
change initiative and thus having a positive influence on the potentially adverse impact of the
change initiative on the employees’ well-being (Day et al., 2017; Van Niekerk, 2017; Alfes et
al., 2019). Ensuring a successful change initiative while simultaneously ensuring the well-
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 16
being of the employees is mainly driven by three factors, namely communication, participation
and support (Ryan & Deci, 2001; Erciyes, 2019; Marsh et al., 2020; Ruggeri et al., 2020).
Employees should be afforded the opportunity to participate throughout the change process
and have their voices heard through a process of consultation (Van Niekerk, 2017). A well-
structured communication strategy should be developed to ensure transparent, prompt and
comprehensive communication that inspires trust in the employees. Finally, change agents
should acknowledge employees’ potential fears, anxieties and uncertainties and create a work
environment that empowers employees and makes them feel safe to share their lived
experiences and how these affect their well-being (Franco et al., 2015; Rahman et al., 2020).
6. CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND DIRECTION FOR
FUTURE RESEARCH
The objective of this study was to understand the impact of organisational change on
employee well-being. Although the participants’ experiences of organisational change differed,
they generally emphasised the negative impacts of organisational change. Four themes
emerged from the data, namely well-being descriptors, ill-being descriptors, employee
expectations and survival. The participants highlighted the extent to which the implementation
of inadequate communication strategies appeared to be problematic. However, Figure 1
illustrates that the adverse impact of organisational change could be overcome by recognising
and meeting employees’ expectations, ensuring effective communication and providing the
appropriate organisational support.
Essentially, organisations and facilitators of change management should understand that
communication is a point of immense concern for employees and that the implementation of
effective communication strategies is key in determining how employees’ well-being is
affected by organisational change. Cultivating a sense of belonging through consultation and
considering employee inputs before making key decisions will enhance employees’
engagement in and commitment to the change process. Change agents, leaders and industrial
and organisational psychologists should attune themselves to the moderating factors that will
alleviate the negative impact of change and enhance employee well-being by creating a more
humane organisational change context. It is proposed that this be done by creating forums in
which employees’ voices can be heard during the planning, implementation and concluding
phases of the change process.
Since organisational change is both dynamic and complex in nature and, given the limited
focus on participants’ experiences, longitudinal studies could be undertaken to gain a better
understanding of the impact of organisational change on employee well-being over time.
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 17
Future research could also explore the differences between the experiences of the victims and
the survivors of change. Future research could focus on the managers who must enact the
change to gain insights into their experiences and the competencies that they need to steer
organisations and employees successfully through the change initiatives.
REFERENCES
Armstrong-Stassen, M. & Schlosser, F. 2008. Taking a positive approach to organizational downsizing. Canadian
Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25(2):93-106. [https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.63].
Athota, V.S. 2017. Foundations and future of well-being: how personality influences happiness and well-being. In
Háša, S. & Brunet-Thornton, R. (eds). Impact of organizational trauma on workplace behavior and
performance. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. pp. 279-294. [https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2021-4.ch012].
Awada, N.I. & Ismail, F. 2019. Happiness in the workplace. International Journal of Innovative Technology and
Exploring Engineering, 8(9S3):1496-1500. [https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.I3313.0789S319].
Benoot, C., Hannes, K. & Bilsen, J. 2016. The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a
worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory. BMC Medical Research Methodology,
16(1):1-12. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6].
Biron, C. & Karanika-Murray, M. 2015. From black and white to colours: moving the science of organizational
interventions for stress and well-being forward. In Biron, C. & Karanika-Murray, M. (eds). Derailed
organizational interventions for stress and well-being: confessions of failure and solutions for success.
Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 275-282. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9867-9].
Brijball-Parumasur, S.B. 2013. Organisational change and stress management. In Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A.,
Odendaal, A. & Roodt, G. (eds). Organisational behaviour: global and Southern African perspectives. 3rd
ed. Cape Town: Pearson.
Bryman, A. & Bell, E. 2014. Research methodology: business and management contexts. Cape Town: Oxford.
Burke, R.J., Ng, E.S.W. & Wolpin, J. 2015. Economic austerity and healthcare restructuring: correlates and
consequences of nursing job insecurity. International Journal of Human Resource Management,
26(5):640-656. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.921634].
Butler, L.D., Mercer, K.A., McClain-Meeder, K., Horne, D.M. & Dudley, M. 2019. Six domains of self-care: attending
to the whole person. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(1):107-124.
[https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1482483].
Crosina, E. & Pratt, M.G. 2019. Toward a model of organizational mourning: the case of former Lehman Brothers
bankers. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1):66-98. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0140].
Day, A., Crown, S.N. & Ivany, M. 2017. Organisational change and employee burnout: the moderating effects of
support and job control. Safety Science, 100:4-2. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.004].
De Jong, T., Wiezer, N., D.E Weerd, M., Nielsen, K., Mattila-Holappa, P. & Mockałło, Z. 2016. The impact of
restructuring on employee well-being: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress,
30(1):91-114. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1136710].
Diener, E., Heintzelman, S.J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L.D. & Oishi, S. 2017. Findings all psychologists
should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie
Canadienne, 58(2):87-104. [https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000063].
Dimitrova, Y. 2019. Corporate culture change management. Economic Alternatives, (2):296-312. [Internet:
https://www.change-management-institute.com/sites/default/files/uploaded-
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 18
content/field_f_content_file/12_yanica_alternatives_en_2_2019.pdf; date of access: 24 March 2022].
Dlouhy, K. & Casper, A. 2020. Downsizing and surviving employees' engagement and strain: the role of job
resources and job demands. Human Resource Management, 1-20. [https://doi.org/ 10.1002/hrm.22032].
Elo, S., Kääriäinenk, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utrianen, K. & Kyngäs, H. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: a
focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1):1-10. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(07)11003-7].
Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1):107-115.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x].
Erciyes, E. 2019. A literature review on change management in security organizations. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi,
8(2):215-227. [https://doi.org/10.28956/gbd.646290].
Etikan, I., Musa, S.A. & Alkassim, R.S. 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling.
American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1):1-4.
[https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11].
Featherston, J. 2008. Qualitative research. In Davis, S.F. & Buskist, W. (eds). 21st century psychology: a reference
handbook. 2nd ed. SAGE. pp. 93-102. [https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956321].
Fløvik, L., Knardahl, S. & Christensen, J.O. 2019. The effect of organizational changes on the psychosocial work
environment: changes in psychological and social working conditions following organizational changes.
Frontiers in Psychology, 10:1-18. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02845].
Franco, K.S., Neivan, E.R., Nery, V.D.F. & Demo, G. 2015. The relationship between context, attitudes and well-
being in organizational change. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32:1-10. [https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-
3772e32ne219].
Fusch, P.I. & Ness, L.R. 2015. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report,
20(9):1408-1416.
Gaya, H.J. & Smith, E.E. 2016. Developing a qualitative single case study in the strategic management realm: an
appropriate research design? International Journal of Business Management & Economic Research,
7(2):529-538.
Graneheim, U.H. & Lundman, B. 2004. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and
measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2):105-112.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001].
Grant, A.M., Christianson, M.K. & Price, R.H. 2007. Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and
employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Executive, 21(1):51-63.
[https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.26421238].
Guest, G., Bunce, A. & Johnson, L. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation
and variability. Field Methods, 18(1):59-82. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903].
Gupta, A.R.P. 2016. A research paper on the employees’ attitude towards organizational change. Journal of Dental
and Medical Sciences, 15(2):44-47. [https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-152124447].
Hargrove, R. 2003. Masterful coaching. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
Harney, B, Fu, N. & Freeney, Y. 2018. Balancing tensions: buffering the impact of organisational restructuring and
downsizing on employee well-being. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(2):235-254.
[https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12175].
Hay, G.J., Parker, S.K. & Luksyte, A. 2020. Making sense of organisational change failure: an identity lens. Human
Relations, 74(2):180-207. [https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0018726720906211].
Jacobs, G. & Keegan, A. 2018. Ethical considerations and change recipients’ reactions: it’s not all about me.
Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1):73-90. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3311-7].
Jarden, R.J., Jarden, A., Weiland, T.J., Taylor, G., Bujalka, H., Brockenshire, N. & Gerdtz, F. 2021. New graduate
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 19
nurse wellbeing, work wellbeing and mental health: A quantitative systematic review. International Journal
of Nursing Studies, 121:1-35. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103997].
Kafle, N.P. 2011. Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified. Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
5(1):181-200. [https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v5i1.8053].
Kaltianen, J., Lipponen, J., Fugate, M. & Vakola, M. 2020. Spiraling work engagement and change appraisals: a
three-wave longitudinal study during organizational change. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,
25(4):244-258.
Kaplan, S., Deshond, R.P. & Tetrick, L.E. 2017. The bigger picture of employee well-being: its role for individuals,
families and societies. SHRM-SIOP Science of HR Series, 1-21. [Internet: http://siop.org/SIOP-
SHRM/2017_02_SHRM-SIOP_Employee_Well-being.pdf; date of access: 12 April 2022].
Kazmi, S.A.Z. & Naaranojan, M. 2013. Comparative approaches of key change management models - a fine
assortment to pick from as per situational needs. The 3rd Annual International Conference on Enterprise
Marketing & Globalization in Singapore. (22-23 April 2013). [https://doi.org/10.5176/2251-1970].
Keyes, C.L.M. 2005. Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of
health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3):539-548. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-
006X.73.3.539].
Kidd, J.M. 2008. Exploring the components of career well-being and the emotions associated with significant career
experiences. Journal of Career Development, 35(2):166-186.
[https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845308325647].
Köper, B. & Richter, G. 2014. Restructuring of organisations and potential implications for their staff. Federal
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1-11. [https://d-nb.info/1156951089/34].
Kotter, J. 1996. Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
Koukoulaki, T., Pinotsi, D., Geogiadou, P., Daikou, A., Zorba, K., Targoutzidist, A., Poulios, K., Naris, S., Panousi,
P., Skoulatakis, Y., Drivas, S., Kapsali, K. & Pahkin, K. 2017. Restructuring seriously damages well-being
of workers: the case of the restructuring programme in local administration in Greece. Safety Science,
100:30-36. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.002].
Lee, R. 2022. Unprecedented times: an examination of workers’ experiences of ill-being and well-being during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Toronto: The University of Guelph. (Dphil thesis).
Lewin, K. 1947. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
Loretto, W., Platt, S. & Popham, F. 2010. Workplace change and employee mental health: results from a
longitudinal study. British Journal of Management, 21:526-540. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
8551.2009.00658.x].
Lundmark, R., Richter, A. & Tafvelint, S. 2022. Consequences of managers’ laissez-faire leadership during
organizational restructuring. Journal of Change Management, 22(1):40-58.
[https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1951811].
Maharaj, S. & Pooe, R. 2021. Overcoming challenges associated with managing change towards digital banking
– a case of a South African Bank. Journal of Contemporary Management, 18(1):70-92.
[https://doi.org/10.35683/jcm20054.97].
Malatjie, I. 2019. The impact of organisational change on employee job satisfaction at the National School of
Government. Africa Journal of Public Sector Development and Governance, 2(1):84-99.
Marsh, H.W., Huppert, F.A., Donald, J.N., Horwood, M.S. & Sahdra, B.K. 2020. The well-being profile (WB-Pro):
creating a theoretically based multidimensional measure of well-being to advance theory, research, policy,
and practice. Psychological Assessment, 32(3):294-313. [https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000787].
McKinley, W. & Scherer, A.G. 2000. Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring. The
Academy of Management Review, 25(4):735. [https://doi.org/10.2307/259202].
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 20
Mintzberg, H. 2003. The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall:
Pearson.
Newman, I., Benz, C.R. & Ridenour, C.S. 1998. Qualitative-quantitative research: a false dichotomy. In Newman,
I. & Ridenour, C.S. (eds). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: exploring the interactive
continuum. Southern Illinois University Press. pp. 1-12. [https://doi.org/0-8093-2150-5].
Nielsen, K., Dawson, J., Hasson, H. & Von Thiele Schwarz, U. 2020. What about me? The impact of employee
change agents’ person-role fit on their job satisfaction during organisational change. Work & Stress,
35(1):57-73. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2020.1730481].
Nikolova, I., Van Ruysseveldt, J., Van Dam, K. & De Witte, H. 2016. Learning climate and workplace learning: does
work restructuring make a difference? Journal of Personnel Psychology, 15(2):66-75.
[https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000151].
O’Neil, S. & Koekemoer, E. 2016. Two decades of qualitative research in psychology, industrial and organisational
psychology and human resource management within South Africa: a critical review. SA Journal of
Industrial Psychology, 42(1):1-16. [https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1350].
Oreg, S., Bartunek, J.M., Lee, G. & Do, B. 2018. An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational
change events. Academy of Management Review, 43(1):65-86. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0335].
Otto, K., Thomson, B. & Rigotti, T. 2018. When dark leadership exacerbates the effects of restructuring. Journal
of Change Management, 18(2):96-115. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2018.1446691].
Pahkin, K., Nielsen, K., Väänänenv, A., Mattila-Holappa, P., Leppänen, A. & Koskinen, A. 2014. Importance of
change appraisal for employee well-being during organizational restructuring: findings from the Finnish
paper industry’s extensive transition. Industrial Health, 52:445-455.
Rafferty, A.E. & Jimmieson, N.L. 2017. Subjective perceptions of organizational change and employee resistance
to change: direct and mediated relationships with employee well-being. British Journal of Management,
28(2):248-264. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12200].
Rahman, A., Björk, P. & Ravald, A. 2020. Exploring the effects of service provider’s organizational support and
empowerment on employee engagement and well-being. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1):1-19.
[https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1767329].
Rothmann, S. 2020. Positive institutions. In Wissing, P.M., Potgieter, J.C., Guse, T., Khumalo, I.P. & Nel, L. (eds).
Towards flourishing: embracing well-being in diverse contexts. 2nd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik, pp. 257-
302.
Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., Maguire, Á., Matz, S. & Huppert, F.A. 2020. Well-being is more than happiness
and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,
18(192):1-16. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y].
Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and
eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1):141-166. [https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-
1958].
Salkind, N.J. 2018. Exploring research. 9th ed. Essex: Pearson.
Schiro, J.B. & Baker, R.L. 2009. Downsizing and organizational change survivors and victims’: mental health
issues. International Journal of Applied Management and Technology, 7(1):91-121.
Senge, P. 1990. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organisation. New York:
Doubleday/Currency.
Simuth, J. 2017. Psychological impacts of downsizing trauma. In Háša, S. & Brunet-Thornton, R. (eds). Impact of
organizational trauma on workplace behavior and performance. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. pp. 120-139.
[https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2021-4.ch005].
Smollan, R.K. 2017. Supporting staff through stressful organizational change. Human Resource Development
DM NEL
A VAN NIEKERK
Gain or loss: A conceptual framework of employee
well-being during change
Journal of Contemporary Management
DHET accredited
ISSN 1815-7440
Volume 20 Issue 1
2023
Pages 83-103
Page 21
International, 20(4):282-304. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2017.1288028].
Terre Blanche, M. & Kelly, K. 1999. Interpretive methods. In Terre Blanche, M. & Durrheim, K. (eds). Research in
practice: applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: UCT Press. pp. 123-146.
Van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B. & Schaufeli, W.B. 2013. Adapting to change: the value of change
information and meaning-making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(1):11-21.
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.004].
Van Niekerk, A. 2017. The psychosocial components of an operational risk management model: risky business in
Tanzania. Pretoria: University of South Africa. (DAdmin thesis).
Vermeulen, L. & Wiesner, R. 2000. Downsizing and the survivor syndrome: the South African case. South African
Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 3(3):387-402.
[https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v3i3.2618].
Werner, A. 2016. An introduction to organisational behaviour. In Werner, A. (ed.). Organisational behaviour: a
contemporary South African perspective. 4th ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik. pp. 3-34.
Westgaard, R.H. & Winkel, J. 2011. Occupational musculoskeletal and mental health: significance of rationalization
and opportunities to create sustainable production systems – a systematic review. Applied Ergonomics,
42(2):261-296. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.07.002].
Wiezer, N., Nielsen, K., Pahkin, K., Widerszal-Bazyl, M., De Jong, T., Mattila-Holappa, P. & Mockałło, Z. 2011.
Exploring the link between restructuring and employee well-being. Työterveyslaitos. Warsaw: National
Research Institute.
Winslow, C.J., Kaplan, S.A., Bradley-Geist, J.C., Lindsey, A.P., Ahmad, A.S. & Hargrove, A.K. 2017. An
examination of two positive organizational interventions: for whom do these interventions work? Journal
of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2):129-137. [https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000035].
Wissing, M.P. 2020. Pathways to flourishing and recognising the changing landscape of positive psychology. In
Wissing, P.M., Potgieter, J.C., Guse, T., Khumalo, I.P. & Nel, L. (eds). Towards flourishing: embracing
well-being in diverse contexts. 2nd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik. pp. 4-26.
Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H. & Zhang, C. 2015. Employee well-being in organizations: theoretical model, scale
development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5):621-644.
[https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1990].
Zito, M., Cortese, C.G. & Colombo, L. 2019. The role of resources and flow at work in well-being. SAGE Open,
9(2):1-12. [https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019849].
Zoogah, D.B. & Beurgre, C.D. 2013. Managing organizational behavior in the African context. New York:
Routledge.
Zwikael, O. & Smyrk, J. 2015. Project governance: balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. International
Journal of Project Management, 33(4):852-862. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.012].