Content uploaded by Velibor Božić
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Velibor Božić on Apr 06, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
VELIBOR BOŽIĆ
Research proposal
Cascading goals and measures
INFORMATION
Cascading goals and measures is a process of aligning organizational goals and objectives across
various levels of an organization, from top-level strategic goals down to individual performance objectives. The
process involves breaking down larger goals into smaller, more specific objectives and measures that can be
tracked and monitored at each level.
The cascading process typically starts with the organization's overall mission and strategic goals, which
are then translated into specific departmental or functional goals. These goals are further broken down into
individual objectives for each employee, which are then measured and tracked to ensure progress toward
achieving the overall mission and strategic goals.
Cascading goals and measures is a key element of performance management, as it ensures that all
employees are working towards a common set of objectives and that individual performance is aligned with
organizational goals. It also helps to ensure that resources are allocated efficiently and that progress towards
achieving goals is tracked and reported on a regular basis.
The process of cascading goals and measures typically involves several steps, including:
1. Defining the organization's mission and strategic goals
2. Developing departmental or functional goals that support the overall mission and strategic goals
3. Breaking down departmental or functional goals into specific objectives for each employee or team
4. Identifying specific measures and metrics for each objective
5. Tracking and monitoring progress towards achieving objectives and goals on an ongoing basis
6. Adjusting goals and measures as needed to ensure alignment with organizational priorities and
changing business conditions.
By cascading goals and measures throughout an organization, employees at all levels are able to see
how their individual contributions support the overall mission and strategic goals, which can increase
motivation and engagement. It also helps to ensure that resources are aligned with priorities and that progress
towards achieving goals is tracked and reported on a regular basis.
DECOMPOSITION OF STRATEGIC GOALS
Decomposition of strategic goals is the process of breaking down high-level strategic goals into more
specific and measurable objectives, tasks, and actions that can be implemented and monitored throughout an
organization. This process enables organizations to effectively align resources, set priorities, and track progress
towards achieving their strategic objectives.
There are several steps involved in the decomposition of strategic goals, including:
1. Clarify and prioritize strategic goals: The first step is to clearly define the strategic goals and prioritize
them based on their importance to the organization. This involves identifying the key drivers of the
organization's success and the critical success factors that must be achieved to reach the desired
future state.
2. Break down strategic goals into objectives: The next step is to break down the strategic goals into
specific and measurable objectives that support the achievement of the strategic goals. Objectives
should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).
3. Define tasks and actions: Once the objectives have been established, it is necessary to define the tasks
and actions required to achieve each objective. This involves identifying the specific actions that must
be taken to move the organization closer to its desired future state.
4. Assign responsibilities: Each task and action should be assigned to a specific person or team
responsible for its completion. This ensures accountability and helps to ensure that progress is tracked
and reported on a regular basis.
5. Establish timelines and milestones: To ensure that progress towards achieving the strategic goals is on
track, it is important to establish timelines and milestones for each objective, task, and action.
6. Monitor and adjust: Finally, the progress towards achieving the strategic goals should be monitored
and adjustments made as necessary. This involves regularly reviewing performance metrics,
identifying areas where progress is not on track, and taking corrective action as needed.
By decomposing strategic goals into more specific and measurable objectives, organizations can
ensure that their resources are aligned with their strategic priorities and that progress towards achieving their
goals is effectively tracked and monitored. This enables organizations to make data-driven decisions, adjust
course as needed, and ultimately achieve their desired future state.
VELIBOR BOŽIĆ
Research proposal
STRATEGIC GOAL MAPS
Strategic goal maps are a visual representation of an organization's strategic goals, objectives, and
initiatives. These maps provide a clear and concise overview of the organization's strategic plan, showing how
each goal and objective is related to the overall strategy and how they all fit together to achieve the desired
outcome.
The purpose of strategic goal maps is to help organizations communicate their strategy in a clear and
concise manner, and to ensure that all stakeholders understand how their individual efforts contribute to the
achievement of the overall strategy.
Creating a strategic goal map typically involves the following steps:
1. Define the strategic goals: The first step is to define the strategic goals that the organization wants to
achieve. These goals should be aligned with the organization's mission and vision, and should be
specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).
2. Identify the objectives: Once the strategic goals have been defined, the next step is to identify the
specific objectives that will help achieve each goal. Objectives should be specific and measurable, and
should align with the overall strategy.
3. Determine the initiatives: Initiatives are the specific projects and activities that will be undertaken to
achieve the objectives. These initiatives should be aligned with the objectives and should be
prioritized based on their potential impact on achieving the strategic goals.
4. Map the goals, objectives, and initiatives: The final step is to map the goals, objectives, and initiatives
on a visual representation such as a map, diagram, or chart. This allows stakeholders to see the
relationships between each element and how they contribute to the achievement of the overall
strategy.
Strategic goal maps provide a useful tool for organizations to communicate their strategy to
stakeholders, align resources and efforts towards achieving the strategic goals, and monitor progress towards
the desired outcomes. By creating a clear and concise visual representation of the strategy, organizations can
ensure that everyone is working towards the same goals and objectives, and that progress towards achieving
those goals is effectively tracked and monitored.
TACTICAL OBJECTIVE MAPS
Tactical objective maps are a visual representation of an organization's tactical objectives, which are
specific, short-term goals that are designed to help achieve the organization's strategic goals. These maps
provide a clear and concise overview of the organization's tactical plan, showing how each objective is related
to the overall strategy and how they all fit together to achieve the desired outcome.
The purpose of tactical objective maps is to help organizations communicate their tactical plan in a
clear and concise manner, and to ensure that all stakeholders understand how their individual efforts
contribute to the achievement of the overall strategy.
Creating a tactical objective map typically involves the following steps:
1. Define the strategic goals: The first step is to define the strategic goals that the organization wants to
achieve. These goals should be aligned with the organization's mission and vision, and should be
specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).
2. Identify the tactical objectives: Once the strategic goals have been defined, the next step is to identify
the specific tactical objectives that will help achieve each goal. Tactical objectives should be specific,
measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART), and should align with the overall strategy.
3. Determine the actions and tasks: Actions and tasks are the specific activities and steps that will be
undertaken to achieve the tactical objectives. These actions and tasks should be aligned with the
objectives and should be prioritized based on their potential impact on achieving the tactical
objectives.
4. Map the tactical objectives, actions, and tasks: The final step is to map the tactical objectives, actions,
and tasks on a visual representation such as a map, diagram, or chart. This allows stakeholders to see
the relationships between each element and how they contribute to the achievement of the overall
strategy.
Tactical objective maps provide a useful tool for organizations to communicate their tactical plan to
stakeholders, align resources and efforts towards achieving the tactical objectives, and monitor progress
towards the desired outcomes. By creating a clear and concise visual representation of the tactical plan,
organizations can ensure that everyone is working towards the same objectives, and that progress towards
achieving those objectives is effectively tracked and monitored.
VELIBOR BOŽIĆ
Research proposal
GOALS AND ORGANIZATIONAL FORMS
Organizational form refers to the structure or design of an organization, including its hierarchical
levels, lines of authority, and reporting relationships. Goals, on the other hand, refer to the desired outcomes
that an organization seeks to achieve. The goals of an organization can be influenced by its organizational form,
and vice versa.
Different organizational forms may be more effective at achieving certain types of goals. For example,
a highly centralized hierarchical structure may be more effective at achieving efficiency and cost reduction
goals, whereas a flatter, more decentralized structure may be more effective at achieving innovation and
responsiveness goals.
Similarly, an organization's goals may influence its choice of organizational form. For example, if an
organization's goal is to be highly innovative and responsive to changes in the market, it may choose to adopt a
flatter, more decentralized structure that allows for more collaboration and flexibility.
Furthermore, the goals of an organization may vary depending on its size, industry, and stage of
development. A small startup may have different goals than a large, established corporation, and may require a
different organizational form to achieve those goals.
The goals of an organization and its organizational form are closely intertwined, and organizations
must carefully consider both factors when designing their structure and setting their goals. The optimal
combination of goals and organizational form will depend on a variety of factors, including the organization's
size, industry, stage of development, and competitive environment.
CLASSIFICATION MATRIX OF OBJECTIVES
A classification matrix of objectives is a tool that is used to classify organizational objectives based on
different criteria or characteristics. The matrix is typically created by plotting objectives on a two-dimensional
grid, with each axis representing a different classification criteria. The resulting matrix can help organizations to
prioritize and manage their objectives more effectively.
One common classification matrix of objectives is the BCG matrix, which was developed by the Boston
Consulting Group. The BCG matrix is used to classify an organization's products or services based on two
criteria: market share and market growth rate. The resulting matrix is divided into four quadrants, each of
which represents a different strategic direction for the products or services:
1. Stars: Products or services with high market share and high market growth rate. These products or
services have high potential for growth and should be invested in to maintain their position.
2. Cash cows: Products or services with high market share and low market growth rate. These products
or services generate high profits and should be maintained and protected.
3. Question marks: Products or services with low market share and high market growth rate. These
products or services require significant investment to grow and should be carefully evaluated for their
potential.
4. Dogs: Products or services with low market share and low market growth rate. These products or
services should be divested or phased out.
Another example of a classification matrix of objectives is the McKinsey 7S framework, which is used
to classify an organization's internal elements based on seven criteria: structure, systems, style, staff, skills,
strategy, and shared values. The resulting matrix is used to identify areas where the organization is strong and
where improvements can be made to achieve its objectives.
A classification matrix of objectives is a useful tool that can help organizations to prioritize and manage
their objectives more effectively. The choice of matrix will depend on the specific needs and characteristics of
the organization.
THE PROCESS OF CASCADING GOALS
Cascading goals is the process of aligning an organization's goals and objectives from the top-down,
ensuring that each level of the organization has objectives that support the overall strategic goals of the
organization. The process typically involves breaking down the organization's strategic goals into smaller, more
specific objectives that can be assigned to different levels of the organization.
The process of cascading goals typically involves the following steps:
1. Define the organization's strategic goals: The first step is to define the high-level goals and objectives
of the organization. These goals should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound
(SMART).
VELIBOR BOŽIĆ
Research proposal
2. Identify key performance indicators (KPIs): Key performance indicators are the specific metrics that
will be used to measure progress towards achieving the strategic goals. KPIs should be quantifiable
and aligned with the overall strategy.
3. Break down the strategic goals into tactical objectives: Tactical objectives are specific, short-term
goals that are designed to help achieve the organization's strategic goals. These objectives should be
aligned with the overall strategy and should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-
bound (SMART).
4. Assign tactical objectives to different levels of the organization: Once the tactical objectives have been
identified, they should be assigned to different levels of the organization, ensuring that each level has
objectives that support the overall strategic goals of the organization.
5. Develop action plans: Action plans are the specific activities and steps that will be undertaken to
achieve the tactical objectives. These plans should be aligned with the objectives and should be
prioritized based on their potential impact on achieving the tactical objectives.
6. Monitor progress: Once the action plans have been developed, it is important to monitor progress
towards achieving the tactical objectives and adjust the plans as needed to ensure that they remain
aligned with the overall strategy.
By cascading goals in this way, organizations can ensure that each level of the organization has clear
objectives that support the overall strategic goals, and that everyone is working towards the same objectives.
This can help to improve alignment and collaboration across the organization, increase accountability, and
ensure that resources and efforts are focused on achieving the organization's most important objectives.
CHAINS OF CAUSE AND EFFECT OF TACTICAL OBJECTIVES
Chains of cause and effect of tactical objectives refer to the relationship between different tactical
objectives and the impact that achieving one objective can have on achieving another. In other words, it is the
cause-and-effect relationship between different tactical objectives that are necessary to achieve the
organization's strategic goals.
For example, let's say that the strategic goal of an organization is to increase customer satisfaction by
improving product quality. To achieve this goal, the organization may have several tactical objectives, such as:
1. Reduce the number of product defects
2. Improve product testing procedures
3. Increase employee training on quality control
4. Implement a customer feedback system
5. Develop new product designs that meet customer needs
The chain of cause and effect between these tactical objectives might look like this:
1. Reducing the number of product defects can lead to an increase in product quality
2. Improving product testing procedures can help to identify and address quality issues more quickly
3. Increasing employee training on quality control can improve the quality of products and reduce
defects
4. Implementing a customer feedback system can provide valuable insights into customer needs and
preferences, helping to guide product design and development
5. Developing new product designs that meet customer needs can help to increase customer satisfaction
and loyalty
Each tactical objective has a cause-and-effect relationship with the other objectives, with each one
contributing to the overall goal of increasing customer satisfaction by improving product quality. By
understanding these relationships and ensuring that each tactical objective is aligned with the overall strategic
goal, organizations can better prioritize their efforts and resources to achieve their objectives in a more
efficient and effective manner.
WHY CASCADING GOALS AND MEASURES ARE A KEY ELEMENT OF
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Cascading goals and measures is a key element of performance management because it helps to
ensure that everyone in the organization is aligned with the overall strategic goals and objectives of the
organization, and is working towards achieving them in a coordinated and focused manner. There are several
reasons why cascading goals and measures is so important for effective performance management:
1. Clarity: Cascading goals and measures provides clarity about what needs to be achieved at each level
of the organization and how each goal contributes to the overall strategic goals of the organization.
This clarity helps to ensure that everyone is on the same page and working towards the same
objectives.
VELIBOR BOŽIĆ
Research proposal
2. Alignment: Cascading goals and measures ensures that everyone's goals and objectives are aligned
with the organization's overall strategy. This alignment helps to ensure that resources and efforts are
focused on achieving the organization's most important objectives.
3. Accountability: Cascading goals and measures creates a sense of accountability throughout the
organization. Each level of the organization is responsible for achieving their own objectives, which are
tied to the objectives of the level above them. This accountability helps to ensure that everyone is
taking ownership of their role in achieving the organization's goals.
4. Monitoring and Evaluation: Cascading goals and measures makes it easier to monitor and evaluate
performance at each level of the organization. By breaking down the overall strategic goals into
smaller, more specific objectives, it is easier to track progress towards achieving those objectives and
to make adjustments as needed to ensure that the organization stays on track.
Cascading goals and measures is an essential element of performance management because it helps to
ensure that everyone in the organization is working towards the same objectives and that efforts and resources
are focused on achieving the organization's most important goals. This helps to improve alignment,
accountability, and ultimately, organizational performance.
KEY ELEMENTS FOR EFFECTIVELY CASCADING GOALS AND MEASURES
To effectively cascade goals and measures throughout an organization, there are several key elements
that are necessary:
1. Clear and measurable strategic goals: The organization's overall strategic goals must be clear and
measurable so that they can be broken down into smaller, more specific tactical objectives that can be
assigned to different departments or teams within the organization.
2. Communication and engagement: Effective communication and engagement is essential to ensure
that everyone in the organization understands the strategic goals and objectives, their role in
achieving them, and the importance of their contributions.
3. Alignment and integration: Cascading goals and measures requires alignment and integration of
objectives across different levels and functions of the organization. This ensures that each level of the
organization is working towards the same overall strategic goals.
4. Performance measurement and monitoring: Effective performance measurement and monitoring is
necessary to track progress towards achieving objectives at each level of the organization and to make
adjustments as needed to ensure that the organization stays on track.
5. Flexibility and adaptability: Cascading goals and measures requires flexibility and adaptability to adjust
objectives and strategies as needed in response to changes in the internal or external environment of
the organization.
By ensuring that these key elements are in place, organizations can effectively cascade goals and
measures throughout the organization, aligning everyone's efforts towards achieving the organization's
strategic goals and objectives.
IMPORTANCE OF CASCADING GOALS AND MEASURES FOR ORGANIZATION
Cascading goals and measures is important for organizations for several reasons:
1. Alignment: Cascading goals and measures helps to ensure that everyone in the organization is aligned
with the overall strategic goals and objectives of the organization. By breaking down the overall
strategic goals into smaller, more specific tactical objectives that are assigned to different
departments or teams within the organization, everyone is working towards the same goals.
2. Accountability: Cascading goals and measures creates a sense of accountability throughout the
organization. Each level of the organization is responsible for achieving their own objectives, which are
tied to the objectives of the level above them. This accountability helps to ensure that everyone is
taking ownership of their role in achieving the organization's goals.
3. Focus: Cascading goals and measures helps to ensure that resources and efforts are focused on
achieving the organization's most important objectives. By breaking down the overall strategic goals
into smaller, more specific tactical objectives, it is easier to prioritize efforts and resources on the
most important objectives.
4. Performance Management: Cascading goals and measures is an important element of performance
management. By setting clear, measurable objectives and tracking progress towards achieving them,
organizations can improve performance management and ensure that everyone is working towards
the same goals.
5. Adaptability: Cascading goals and measures allows organizations to be more adaptable and responsive
to changes in the internal or external environment. By breaking down the overall strategic goals into
VELIBOR BOŽIĆ
Research proposal
smaller, more specific tactical objectives, it is easier to adjust objectives and strategies as needed in
response to changes in the environment.
Cascading goals and measures is important for organizations because it helps to ensure alignment,
accountability, focus, performance management, and adaptability, all of which are critical to the success of an
organization in achieving its strategic goals and objectives.
VULNERABILITIES OF CASCADING GOALS AND MEASURES
While cascading goals and measures can be a powerful tool for improving alignment, accountability,
and focus within an organization, there are several potential vulnerabilities that organizations should be aware
of:
1. Lack of alignment: If the overall strategic goals of the organization are not clearly defined or
communicated, or if there is a lack of alignment between the goals and objectives of different
departments or teams, cascading goals and measures may not be effective. This can result in
confusion, inefficiency, and a lack of progress towards the organization's overall goals.
2. Overreliance on metrics: While metrics can be a powerful tool for measuring progress towards goals,
an overreliance on metrics can also be a vulnerability. Organizations may become overly focused on
achieving specific metrics at the expense of the overall strategic goals, or may use metrics that are not
well-suited to measuring progress towards the organization's goals.
3. Lack of flexibility: While it is important to set clear, measurable objectives, organizations must also be
willing to adjust their goals and objectives as needed in response to changes in the internal or external
environment. A lack of flexibility can make it difficult for organizations to adapt to changing
circumstances and may result in goals and objectives that are no longer relevant or achievable.
4. Lack of ownership: Cascading goals and measures requires that everyone in the organization takes
ownership of their role in achieving the organization's goals. If individuals or departments do not take
ownership of their objectives, or if there is a lack of accountability for achieving those objectives,
cascading goals and measures may not be effective.
5. Complexity: Cascading goals and measures can become overly complex if there are too many levels or
if objectives are not clearly defined. This can make it difficult for individuals to understand how their
work contributes to the overall strategic goals of the organization, or may result in a lack of clarity
about what objectives are most important.
Overall, organizations should be aware of these potential vulnerabilities and take steps to mitigate
them in order to ensure that cascading goals and measures are effective in achieving the organization's overall
strategic goals and objectives.
OVERCOMING THE VULNERABILITES
Organizations can take several steps to overcome the potential vulnerabilities associated with
cascading goals and measures:
1. Ensure alignment: To overcome the vulnerability of lack of alignment, organizations should ensure
that their overall strategic goals are clearly defined and communicated throughout the organization.
This may involve regular communication and collaboration between different departments or teams
to ensure that everyone is working towards the same goals.
2. Balance metrics with qualitative data: To overcome the vulnerability of overreliance on metrics,
organizations should balance quantitative metrics with qualitative data, such as feedback from
customers or employees. This can help to ensure that the organization is achieving its goals in a way
that is sustainable and aligned with its values.
3. Build in flexibility: To overcome the vulnerability of lack of flexibility, organizations should build in
mechanisms for regularly reviewing and adjusting their goals and objectives as needed. This may
involve regular strategic planning sessions or frequent check-ins to ensure that objectives are still
relevant and achievable in light of changing circumstances.
4. Foster ownership: To overcome the vulnerability of lack of ownership, organizations should foster a
culture of accountability and ownership throughout the organization. This may involve setting clear
expectations for performance, providing regular feedback and coaching, and recognizing and
rewarding individuals and teams who take ownership of their objectives.
5. Simplify: To overcome the vulnerability of complexity, organizations should strive to keep their
cascading goals and measures as simple and clear as possible. This may involve consolidating
objectives or reducing the number of levels in the cascading framework to ensure that objectives are
easy to understand and achievable.
VELIBOR BOŽIĆ
Research proposal
By taking these steps, organizations can overcome the potential vulnerabilities associated with
cascading goals and measures and ensure that this tool is effective in achieving their overall strategic goals and
objectives.
EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL CASCADING GOALS AND MEASURES
There are many examples of successful cascading goals and measures in practice. Here are a few
examples:
1. Google: Google is known for its rigorous performance management system, which includes cascading
goals and measures. At Google, each employee sets quarterly goals that are aligned with the
company's overall strategic objectives. These goals are reviewed regularly and progress is tracked
using a system called OKRs (Objectives and Key Results).
2. Procter & Gamble: Procter & Gamble uses a cascading goal system that starts with the company's
overall strategic objectives and cascades down to individual employee goals. The system is designed to
ensure that each employee's goals are aligned with the company's overall objectives and that progress
is tracked and reviewed regularly.
3. Marriott International: Marriott International uses a cascading goal system called "Putting People
First," which is designed to align the company's goals with the needs of its employees, customers, and
shareholders. The system includes a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) that are used to track
progress towards the company's strategic objectives.
4. Toyota: Toyota uses a cascading goal system called Hoshin Kanri, which is designed to align the
company's goals with the needs of its customers and stakeholders. The system includes a process for
setting and reviewing goals, as well as a system of performance metrics that are used to track progress
towards those goals.
5. Amazon: Amazon uses a cascading goal system that includes a set of leadership principles and a
system of goals and metrics that are designed to ensure that the company is focused on delivering
value to its customers. The system includes a set of metrics that are used to track progress towards
the company's overall strategic objectives, as well as individual goals for each employee.
In all of these examples, the cascading goals and measures system is used to align the organization's
goals with its overall strategic objectives, track progress towards those objectives, and ensure that each
employee's goals are aligned with the needs of the organization. This helps to ensure that the organization is
focused on delivering value to its customers and stakeholders, and that progress towards its strategic
objectives is regularly monitored and reviewed.
Cascading goals and measures is an important tool for performance management in organizations. By
aligning individual goals and objectives with the overall strategic goals of the organization, cascading goals and
measures helps to ensure that everyone in the organization is working towards the same goals and objectives.
This tool also allows organizations to track progress towards their goals, identify areas for improvement, and
make necessary adjustments to their strategy.
However, to successfully implement cascading goals and measures, organizations need to ensure
alignment, balance metrics with qualitative data, build in flexibility, foster ownership, and simplify the process.
By taking these steps, organizations can overcome the potential vulnerabilities associated with cascading goals
and measures and ensure that this tool is effective in achieving their overall strategic goals and objectives.
Overall, cascading goals and measures is a powerful tool for driving performance in organizations, and its
effectiveness depends on how well it is implemented and managed.
ABOUT REFERENCES….
There is a lot of literature available on cascading goals and measures, as it is an important tool for
performance management in organizations. Here are a few key sources of information on this topic:
1. "The Strategy-Focused Organization" by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton: This book provides a
comprehensive overview of the balanced scorecard approach to performance management, which
includes cascading goals and measures. The authors describe how to create a strategy map, align
individual goals with the overall strategy, and measure progress towards strategic objectives.
2. "The Execution Premium" by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton: This book builds on the concepts
introduced in "The Strategy-Focused Organization" and provides practical guidance on how to
implement a strategy-focused organization. The authors describe how to cascade goals and measures
throughout the organization and use the balanced scorecard to drive performance.
3. "Managing by Objectives" by Peter Drucker: This classic book introduces the concept of management
by objectives, which includes cascading goals and measures. Drucker describes how to set objectives
VELIBOR BOŽIĆ
Research proposal
that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound, and how to align those objectives
with the overall strategy of the organization.
4. "Hoshin Kanri: The Strategic Approach to Continuous Improvement" by Thomas L. Jackson: This book
describes the Hoshin Kanri approach to performance management, which is used by Toyota and other
Japanese companies. The approach includes cascading goals and measures throughout the
organization and using them to drive continuous improvement.
5. "OKRs: The Simple Idea that Drives 10x Growth" by Paul Niven: This book provides practical guidance
on how to implement the OKR (Objectives and Key Results) system, which is used by many companies,
including Google. The system includes cascading goals and measures and provides a simple way to
align individual goals with the overall strategy of the organization.
6. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The execution premium: Linking strategy to operations for
competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press.
7. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible
outcomes. Harvard Business Press.
8. Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. HarperCollins.
9. Niven, P. R. (2016). OKRs: The simple idea that drives 10x growth. John Wiley & Sons.
10. Jackson, T. L. (2006). Hoshin Kanri: The strategic approach to continuous improvement. CRC Press.
11. Jones, S. R. (2008). Cascading goals: Aligning your organization, your department, and your team.
AMACOM.
12. Lynch, R., & Cross, K. (1991). Measure up—the essential guide to measuring business performance.
Mandarin.
13. Zainal, N., & Yusoff, R. M. (2012). Cascading strategic goals and objectives: A case study in a Malaysian
government-linked company. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 2(3), 29-41.
14. Duncan, W. J., & Gibson, N. C. (2006). Measures and metrics for cascading strategy: A practical toolkit.
Journal of Business Strategy, 27(4), 42-50.
15. Doss, J. G., & Morris, T. (2017). The performance management process: Aligning strategy with action.
Business Horizons, 60(2), 235-244