ArticlePDF Available

Inclusive Education: Advantages and Overcoming Barriers

Authors:

Abstract

Schools and other learning environments have increasingly promoted equal educational opportunities among all students in recent years to create more inclusive learning environments. Inclusive education has impactful benefits on all students, not just those with diverse needs, as it is "the gateway to full participation in society" (United Nations, n.d, pg. 3). However, barriers to inclusion such as staff training and funding are necessary to consider in order to create and maintain meaningful, inclusive learning environments. In order to overcome these barriers to inclusive education, educators have been encouraged to integrate aspects of both Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI) to maintain the least restrictive environment while tailoring to individual student needs. The integration of UDL principles into classroom/learning environments promotes inclusion through supports for all students, including those with diverse needs. Educators can utilize strategies like the Three-Block Model of Universal Design for Learning (TBM) and ADAPT to aid them in the integration of UDL.
Vol. 6(1) | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31542/muse.v6i1.2281
MacEwan University Student eJournal | © 2022 under CC BY-NC | ISSN 2369-5617
MUSe
2022
Inclusive Education: Advantages and Overcoming Barriers
Emily Volker, Shaelyn Gupta, & Brindy Brown
Abstract
Schools and other learning environments have increasingly promoted equal educational
opportunities among all students in recent years to create more inclusive learning environments.
Inclusive education has impactful benefits on all students, not just those with diverse needs, as
it is "the gateway to full participation in society" (United Nations, n.d, pg. 3). However, barriers to
inclusion such as staff training and funding are necessary to consider in order to create and
maintain meaningful, inclusive learning environments. To overcome these barriers to inclusive
education, educators have been encouraged to integrate aspects of both Universal Design for
Learning (UDL) and Differentiated Instruction (DI) to maintain the least restrictive environment
while tailoring to individual student needs. The integration of UDL principles into
classroom/learning environments promotes inclusion through supports for all students, including
those with diverse needs. Educators can utilize strategies like the Three-Block Model of
Universal Design for Learning (TBM) and ADAPT to aid them in the integration of UDL.
Introduction
Inclusive education is an approach that encourages diversity and promotes equal educational
opportunities among all students, despite any differences one may possess (Government of
Alberta, 2021). Inclusive education has become a norm in our Canadian society, with its origins
tied partially to the 1982 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Hutchinson & Specht,
2020) and its goals of equality. The Inclusive Education approach is one that has education
programs that should adapt to the individual needs of all students with support and compassion
in the least restrictive environment. Effective inclusion practices in an educational environment
are essential in making meaningful learning accessible to all students. There are many
advantages and disadvantages involved in inclusive education, which mainly depend on the
school environment. Educators and stakeholders need to understand strategies available that
will ensure success among all students.
Benefits of Inclusion
The advantages of inclusive education are abundant: fostering social relationships, community
building, providing access, unconditional acceptance, creating goals based on individual ability
and needs, motivation through peer connections, parent involvement, and promoting an
atmosphere of respect and belonging (Hutchinson & Specht, 2020).
The United Nations Toolkit of Disability (n.d.) explains that the educational inclusion of students
with diverse needs is "the gateway to full participation in society" and "promotes inclusive and
tolerant societies" (Module 14, p. 3). Alberta Education (2021) echoes this sentiment by
2
MUSe
2022
"...promote[ing] equal opportunities for all learners in Alberta...[and] accepting responsibility for
all children and students" (para.1). Furthermore, research reveals that inclusion creates an
advantage for all students, increasing the opportunity for friendships to arise and preparing
students for inclusion outside of the classroom (Mieghem et al., 2018).
Barriers to Inclusion
When discussing the topic of inclusive education, it is crucial to understand and awareness of its
many impactful benefits, not just on learning but also on schools, students, and society. So why
is it not the universal standard form of education? To fully develop an inclusive education
environment, the whole education system is transformed (UNICEF, 2017). This is a complex
and time-consuming process and as such, possesses many barriers that need consideration.
Ahmad (2012) acknowledges physical, attitudinal and communication barriers that negatively
affect inclusive education. "One of the most significant barriers is the attitudes of parents,
teachers and students" (p. 3). Lack of access to infrastructure, training, support staff, and
funding were some of Brown's (2018) significant concerns (para. 2). Despite government
policies and norms emphasizing inclusive education in Canada, practices and funding have not
kept pace with these changes. Improving the education of educators and documenting student
outcomes and experiences can be a valuable response to improve this barrier (Cologon, 2013).
Thoughts and Needs for Inclusive Education
The idea of tailoring learning may include modifications or accommodations, least restrictive
environment (LRE), Universal Design for Learning (UDL), or Differentiated Instruction (DI)
(Hutchinson & Specht, 2020). Influenced by universal design in architecture, the goal of UDL is
to support equal opportunity and promote structure and success among all learners within the
classroom (CAST, 2018). UDL encourages teachers to provide means and pedagogical
materials that can meet the needs of all students (Hutchinson & Specht, 2020, p. 6).
Jennifer Katz's (2013) Three-Block Model of Universal Design for Learning (TBM) details a
block system comprised of 3 main ideas to support inclusion successfully.
First Block: Social and Emotional Learning (Respect Diversity Program). Building
learning environments that utilize respect, compassion, and democratic classroom
management (as cited in Katz, 2013, p. 158). Katz claims “results show profound impact
in terms of social inclusion and engagement for both students and teachers” (as cited in
Katz, 2013, p. 158).
Second Block: Inclusive Instructional Practice. Firstly, ensuring access to learning
opportunities that address the individual needs of students and then planning academic
instruction involving evidence-based practices (as cited in Katz, 2013, p. 158). For
example, building rubrics “…that reflect multiple developmental levels of understanding,
and can be used to assess multi-modal expression and understandings” (Katz, 2013, p.
159).
3
MUSe
2022
Third Block: Systems and Structures. School leadership holds a critical influence on how
students are supported by how they support their staff. Creating policies within the
school, professional development to educate staff, and moving away from segregated
practices are a few ways that school leadership can begin prioritizing inclusion (Katz,
2013, p. 192)
In Katz’s 2013 study, classrooms implementing the model showed “promising” results (p. 182);
students were significantly more engaged academically and socially. The Three-Block Model of
UDL shows a potential framework educators can use to increase universal support in their
classrooms while reducing potential stress and worries about UDL implementation.
Differentiated instruction (DI) aids teachers in making decisions that address a student's specific
characteristics, skills, experiences, and difficulties (Hutchinson & Specht, 2020, p. 6). DI
maximizes learning by considering individual learning styles to support an inclusive classroom
and recognizes that some students may require modifications or accommodations to
demonstrate learning in meaningful ways. Incorporating UDL and DI in the classroom allows
educators to determine ways of removing barriers and engaging students to create access for
all.
Hutchinson and Specht (2020) developed an inclusion strategy called "ADAPT" (p. 24). The
five-step tool was designed for educators to assist in maintaining an inclusive classroom
environment.
Step 1) Account of Students’ Strengths and Needs: educators should understand each
student’s social, emotional, behavioural, physical, and academic strengths and needs
through files such as an IPP and observations (p. 24-25)
Step 2) Demands of the Classroom on Students: considering the social, emotional,
behavioural, physical, and academic demands is important when adapting the classroom
to include all students. For example, think about if respectful interactions are being
modelled, if the classroom layout is accessible, especially for those in wheelchairs or are
blind, or if each student has the tools needed to access the academic materials like
reading a textbook or writing an essay (p. 25).
Step 3) Adaptions: comparing the needs of a student to the demands of the classroom
will help educators identify where adaptations are needed to best support that student’s
learning. Hutchinson and Specht (2020) outline strategies to ADAPT such as bypassing
(e.g., spell check to bypass spelling challenges) and teaching basic skills (e.g., “study
skills may be an urgent need for students with LD, there are likely to be others in the
class who will benefit”) (p. 26).
Step 4) Perspectives and Consequences: reflect on adaptions and consider the
perspectives of the students and educators. Educators may want to choose simple
adaptions that benefit many or all students in the classroom in order to maintain and
manage the potential additional demands that adaptions may place on the educator (pg.
4
MUSe
2022
26). Reflecting on the user’s experience is critical to ensure an adaptions success; do
the students feel comfortable and confident using it? Do they feel like they are drawing
unwanted attention? “Ask the student, and ADAPT in a way that is respectful of him”
(Hutchinson & Specht, 2020, p. 27).
Step 5) Teach and Assess the Match: assess “how well the adaption has matched
student strengths and needs to the classroom demands” (Hutchinson & Specht, 2020, p.
27). Observations, conversations, and charting marks while the adaption is in use can
help determine whether it needs to be altered or not for future use (p. 27).
Strategies like ADAPT have been developed but ADAPT is unique in how it includes
perspectives of students affected by this strategy (p. 24). Using strategies like ADAPT aids
educators on how to meaningfully include students with diverse learning needs by creating
adaptations that consider the needs and strengths of the student and the demands of the
classroom environment (Hutchinson & Specht, 2020, p. 24).
Community, acceptance, and participation are needed for successful inclusive educational
systems. A community allows students to feel encouraged by adults who genuinely care about
them and their educational success (Hutchinson & Specht, 2020, p. 18). Alberta's education
system states that "inclusion is a way of thinking and acting that demonstrates universal
acceptance and promotes a sense of belonging for all learners (Government of Alberta, 2021). It
is crucial to foster good teaching by embracing community within the classroom to create an
opportunity for all students to develop and maintain a sense of belonging. For an inclusive
education environment to work, educators must be prepared to play a critical role in "prepar[ing]
the next generation to honor our national commitment to inclusion of persons with disabilities in
all aspects of Canadian society" (Hutchison & Specht, p. 5).
Ensuring students' needs are being met can be done by utilizing resources like Indicators of
Inclusive Schools (2013). The indicators are organized around 5 dimensions (p. 6).
1. Establishing Inclusive Values and Principles (e.g., “Diversity is valued as an enriching
aspect of the school environment” (Alberta Ed., 2013, p. 8)).
2. Building Inclusive Learning Environments (e.g., “The school building is physically
accessible to all students” (Alberta Ed., 2013, p. 9)).
3. Providing Supports for Success (e.g., “Ongoing assessment identifies when students are
in need of additional supports, interventions and services” (Alberta Ed., 2013, p. 10)).
4. Organizing Learning and Instruction (e.g., “Teachers provide multiple ways for students
to access new information and concepts” (Alberta Ed., 2013, p. 11)).
5. Engaging with Parents and the Community (e.g., “Staff and parents collaborate to
support student success” (Alberta Ed., 2013, p. 12)).
5
MUSe
2022
“Each dimension is supported by sample indicators that provide descriptions, based on current
research…, of what each particular dimension might look like” (Alberta Ed., 2013, p. 6). Utilizing
resources like Indicators of Inclusive Schools (2013) can support educators implement, reflect,
assess, and improve learning environments to be more inclusive through a series of tools and
surveys (Alberta Ed., 2013, p. 5).
Conclusion
Education programs should adapt to the individual needs of all students with support and
compassion in the least restrictive environment. Inclusion is not a privilege. It is a right; every
student should be provided with an opportunity to learn and reach their full potential in an
environment that promotes community and belonging. The knowledge, beliefs, and values about
inclusion create what an educator chooses to represent in a classroom environment and,
furthermore in society. Every student is capable of learning and participating when given the
appropriate resources and support.
6
MUSe
2022
References
Alberta Education (2013). Indicators of Inclusion. Alberta.ca. Retrieved from
https://open.alberta.ca/publications/9781460107157
Alberta Education. (2021). Inclusive education. Alberta.ca. Retrieved from
https://www.alberta.ca/inclusive-education.aspx
Brown, S. (2018, December 3). Inclusive education in Canada: Steps taken and the long road
ahead. Education International. Retrieved October 25, 2021, Retrieved from
https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/22684:inclusive-education-in-canada-steps-taken-and-the-
long-road-ahead- by-dr-sherri-brown
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.2. Retrieved from
http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Cologon, K. (2013). Inclusion in education towards equality for students with disabilities.
Children with Disability Australia. Retrieved from https://apo.org.au/node/36129
Hutchinson, N. L., & Specht, J. A. (2020). Inclusion of learners with exceptionalities in
Canadian schools: A practical handbook for teachers. Pearson.
Inclusive Education Canada. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://inclusiveeducation.ca/about-2/
Katz, J. (2013). The Three Block Model of Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Engaging
students in inclusive education. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(1), 153-194.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/canajeducrevucan.36.1.153.pdf.
Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2018). An Analysis of Research on
Inclusive Education: A Systematic Search and Meta Review. Retrieved from:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012
Roldan, S., Marauri, J., Aubert, A., & Flecha, R. (2021). How Inclusive Interactive Learning
Environments Benefit Students Without Special Needs. Frontiers in Psychology:
Educational Psychology. Retrieved from:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661427/full
United Nations. (n.d.). Module 14: Inclusive Education. Toolkit on Disability for Africa.
https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/disability/Toolkit/Inclusive-Education.docx
United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund. (2017, September). Inclusive
Education - UNICEF.
https://www.unicef.org/eca/sites/unicef.org.eca/files/IE_summary_accessible_220917_0.pdf
... This can involve setting diversity goals and implementing blind recruitment processes to reduce bias. Current research has and continues to show that a wide-ranging education positively impacts all constituency members, not just those with diverse needs, and is considered the gateway to full social participation (Volker et al., 2022). Education leaders' sense of self-efficacy is a critical indicator of the success of comprehensive education initiatives, and their experiences, perceived administrative support, and stress levels can impact inclusion success (Sharma & Subban, 2023). ...
... To actively consider diverse candidates for leadership roles, it is imperative to implement inclusive hiring practices, as supported by relevant scholarly works. In order to foster the growth of aspiring women leaders, it is essential to address the unique challenges minority women leaders face Rodriguez & Brown, 2021;Volker et al., 2022). Policies supporting diversity in leadership roles should be actively supported, something many relevant researchers and sources assert. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Minority women encounter a myriad of challenges and disparities in their pursuit of leadership positions in K-12 education. While the number of women leading independent schools has increased, they are more likely to achieve headship in small and K-8 schools rather than in larger schools and secondary settings. Marginalizing policies and climates still exist within schools, but women leaders are working for change through activism and efforts intended to promote gender equity. Equitable leadership and social justice are essential concepts in addressing the needs of women and minoritized people in educational leadership. As such, increasing the number of women of color in educational leadership positions can have a positive effect on such topics as racism, poverty, oppression, and work-life balance, among others. Moreover, advancing the number of minority women in K-12 leadership can, and indeed does, positively contribute to students' academic success.
... There are many advantages and disadvantages to inclusive education, which mainly depend on the school environment. Educators and stakeholders need to understand the strategies available to ensure success among all students (Volker, Gupta & Brown, 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study focuses on how primary school teachers evaluate inclusive education as a way to include all children in schools, which is a problem in education systems around the world. A phenomenology design, one of the qualitative research patterns, was used in the study. The study group consists of 11 primary school teachers with disadvantaged students in their classes in Istanbul. According to the information obtained, teachers stated that they did not take inclusivity/multiculturalism education courses at the Faculty of Education; therefore, they did not consider themselves sufficient, the materials necessary for inclusive education in their classrooms were not sufficient, they did not devote enough time to students with differences due to the large number of students in their classes, they could not cooperate with families. Since the findings are obtained from the experiences of teachers working in the field, they can contribute to all other teachers and to the literature and educational program designers.
... An educational system that supports individuals with varying needs has been a crucial discussion over the years (Volker, Gupta & Brown, 2022). Disabilities vary in form and type. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: This study explored the challenges visually impaired (VI) students face concerning fashion skill acquisition. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research design was based on qualitative. The combination of purposive and snowball sampling techniques was chosen to ensure a diverse participant pool, capturing a range of perspectives on what visually impaired students face concerning fashion skill acquisition. Thematic analysis was employed to uncover patterns and themes, contributing to a rich understanding of the subject matter. Findings: The findings revealed that the visually impaired are challenged by barriers to enrolment in fashion programmes, the cost-intensive nature of training, lack of sight, lack of skilled teachers and perceptions about Students with Visual Impairments (SVI) in Fashion. The study initiates further stakeholder discussions regarding designing a simplified inclusive curriculum to accommodate individuals with visually impaired and interested in enrolling on fashion courses. The Research Limitation: Purposive and snowball sampling techniques may introduce selection bias, as participants are recruited based on specific criteria and through referrals. This may result in a sample that is more inclined to share similar perspectives, potentially overlooking the diversity of experiences within the visually impaired student community. Practical Implication: Implementation of these practical measures can contribute to breaking down barriers and ensuring equal access to opportunities in the field of fashion for all students, regardless of visual ability. Social Implication: Inclusive fashion education for the visually impaired has the potential of developing such individuals socially and economically thereby relieving the government of potential financial burden and reducing the social exclusion that the visually impaired experience. Originality/ value: The novelty of studying visually impaired students regarding fashion skill acquisition lies in its potential to uncover unique challenges, innovative solutions, and opportunities for inclusivity in education and vocational training.
Article
Full-text available
This quasi-qualitative study explored the concerns, barriers, and impacts of implementing Inclusive Education (IE) in elementary schools in Sumatra and Java, Indonesia. Despite the Indonesian government's mandate to implement IE through Ministry of Education Act No. 70 of 2009, various challenges hinder its effective implementation. This study aims to provide a thorough assessment of IE strategies employed in Indonesian elementary schools by analyzing key factors and offering recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of IE for both students and teachers. A survey and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 elementary school teachers to gain insight into their experiences and perceptions of IE. The findings suggest that teachers often lack confidence in employing inclusive strategies because of limited knowledge and large class sizes, highlighting the need for ongoing professional development. Additionally, while there is evidence of positive attitudes towards special educational needs (SEN) students among peers and parents, teachers may not fully embrace IE. These findings will inform policymakers, educators, and stakeholders about the current state of IE and the necessary steps to improve it, ultimately contributing to developing a more inclusive and equitable education system in Indonesia.
Article
Full-text available
When the Three Block Model of Universal Design for Learning (Katz, 2012a) is implemented, outcomes related to student academic and social engagement were investigated in this study. 631 students from Grades 1 to 12 attending ten schools located in two rural and three urban school divisions in Manitoba took part in the study. Intervention and control groups were assessed pre and during intervention for academic and social engagement. Student and teacher demographics, types of task and grouping structures being assigned were investigated to determine impacts on engagement. Students completed several measures of classroom climate, belongingness, student autonomy, and inclusivity/exclusivity, and a selected sample were observed to obtain detailed information about their engaged behavior. Data were analyzed using repeated measures MANCOVAs. The intervention significantly increased students' engaged behavior, particularly active engagement, and promoted social engagement through increased peer interactions, student autonomy, and inclusivity.
Article
Across the world, there have been many policy developments in and reviews of inclusive education (IE) but what appears to be missing is an up to date and thorough review of IE in general. What is required is a synopsis of previous reviews to help guide future practice and research. The aim of this paper is to analyse existing reviews of IE regarding (1) which themes have been studied, (2) what can be learned from these reviews and (3) what gaps there are in the research that can be addressed. Published reviews were identified through a systematic search using the Education Resource Information Center (ERIC) and Web of Science (WoS) databases. A thematic analysis of 26 reviews revealed five main themes: attitudes towards IE, teachers’ professional development in IE, IE practices, student participation and critical reflections on IE research. The conclusion is that for the implementation of IE, it is vital that there is professional development for teachers regarding evidence-informed IE practices which would lead to successful teacher experiences. In addition, suggestions for research into the attitudes of all students, with and without special educational needs, and school leaders are made, as well as some suggestions regarding students’ academic participation in IE.
Indicators of Inclusion. Alberta.ca
References Alberta Education (2013). Indicators of Inclusion. Alberta.ca. Retrieved from https://open.alberta.ca/publications/9781460107157
Inclusive education. Alberta.ca
Alberta Education. (2021). Inclusive education. Alberta.ca. Retrieved from https://www.alberta.ca/inclusive-education.aspx
Inclusive education in Canada: Steps taken and the long road ahead. Education International
  • S Brown
Brown, S. (2018, December 3). Inclusive education in Canada: Steps taken and the long road ahead. Education International. Retrieved October 25, 2021, Retrieved from https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/22684:inclusive-education-in-canada-steps-taken-and-thelong-road-ahead-by-dr-sherri-brown
Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.2
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Inclusion in education towards equality for students with disabilities. Children with Disability Australia
  • K Cologon
Cologon, K. (2013). Inclusion in education towards equality for students with disabilities. Children with Disability Australia. Retrieved from https://apo.org.au/node/36129
Inclusion of learners with exceptionalities in Canadian schools: A practical handbook for teachers
  • N L Hutchinson
  • J A Specht
Hutchinson, N. L., & Specht, J. A. (2020). Inclusion of learners with exceptionalities in Canadian schools: A practical handbook for teachers. Pearson.
How Inclusive Interactive Learning Environments Benefit Students Without Special Needs
  • S Roldan
  • J Marauri
  • A Aubert
  • R Flecha
Roldan, S., Marauri, J., Aubert, A., & Flecha, R. (2021). How Inclusive Interactive Learning Environments Benefit Students Without Special Needs. Frontiers in Psychology: Educational Psychology. Retrieved from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661427/full