- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Multimedia Tools and Applications
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15034-4
Research on the factors affecting accuracy of abstract
painting orientation detection
Qiang Zhao1,2 ·Zheng Chang3,4 ·Ziwen Wang2
Received:29 April 2022 / Revised: 6 November2022 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 /
©The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023
Abstract
An abstract painting’s hanging orientation directly affects how audiences judge its artistic
value. Choosing the optimal hanging orientation can preserve the artist’s primary inten-
tion, preserving the original aesthetic value to a greater extent. Aesthetic value is frequently
influenced by human subjective consciousness. Previous approaches improved direction
recognition accuracy only by improving the feature extraction method and deep learning
network. For this paper, the key factors that can influence recognition accuracy (such as
painting content, image features and learning models) were investigated in conjunction with
painting skills to find an experimental setting method that can enhance recognition accu-
racy. Experiment results show that the content of the painting has the greatest impact on
classification accuracy. Furthermore, the average accuracy can be increased to more than
90% by reducing the number of painting categories in a dataset and the number of direc-
tions to be classified. While the outcome is superior to the state of the art, it is one-sided
to rely solely on the information in the abstract painting. A combination of eye tracker data
and questionnaires will be used in the future to examine the effect of audience subjective
feelings on orientation classification.
Keywords Orientation detection ·Abstract paintings ·Recognition accuracy ·
Image feature ·Deep neural network
Qiang Zhao
hmoe@vip.qq.com
1Institute of Electronic and Information Engineering, University of Electronic Science
and Technology of China, Dongguan, China
2School of Automation and Software Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
3School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science
and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
4Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyv¨
askyl¨
a,
P.O. Box 35, FIN-40014, Jyv¨
askyl¨
a, Finland
Published online: 17 March 2023
Multimedia Tools and Applications (2023) 82:36231–36254
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.