Conference PaperPDF Available

Wind turbines and their role in the future of energy systems Introduction

Authors:

Abstract

As fossil energy supplies dwindle, the development of alternative energy sources has become a necessity. Simultaneously, global energy demand is increasingly rising, placing the planet on the brink of a global energy crisis. Furthermore, the widespread use of traditional energy sources pollutes the atmosphere and leads to global warming. Wind and other renewable energy sources, on the other hand, are feasible and clean alternatives to fossil fuels. Wind is one of the most cost effective and efficient renewable energy sources because of its low operating costs and broad availability. One of the fastest growing clean energy technologies is wind power. Globally, consumption is growing, partially due to lower prices.
Wind turbines and their role in the future of energy systems
Arian gholami
1
(Master of Energy Economy University of Kurdistan)
Nafiseh ghahremani naghmeh
2
(Master of Energy Economy University of Kurdistan)
Abstract:
As fossil energy supplies dwindle, the development of alternative energy sources has become a
necessity. Simultaneously, global energy demand is increasingly rising, placing the planet on the
brink of a global energy crisis. Furthermore, the widespread use of traditional energy sources
pollutes the atmosphere and leads to global warming. Wind and other renewable energy
sources, on the other hand, are feasible and clean alternatives to fossil fuels. Wind is one of the
most cost effective and efficient renewable energy sources because of its low operating costs
and broad availability. One of the fastest growing clean energy technologies is wind power.
Globally, consumption is growing, partially due to lower prices.
Keywords: wind Energy, Solar Energy, Renewable Energy, Non-Renewable Energy, Wind Energy
1
ec.arian.gholami@gmail.com
2
Nafisehghahremani71@gmail.com
Introduction:
wind energy
Wind power is a type of energy conversion in which turbines transform wind kinetic energy into
mechanical or electrical energy that may be utilized as commercial wind turbines generate
electricity by harnessing rotational energy to power a generator. They are composed of a blade
or rotor and an enclosure known as a nacelle, which houses a drive train atop a tall tower. The
biggest turbines can generate 4.89.5 megawatts of electricity, with rotor diameters that can
exceed 162 meters (531 feet), and are mounted to towers that may reach 240 meters (787
feet). Wind energy is the most established and mature renewable energy source. It creates
electricity by using the kinetic energy created by the influence of air currents. It is a clean and
renewable energy source that decreases greenhouse gas emissions and protects the
environment.
Wind turbines:
Wind power has been utilized since antiquity to propel sail-powered vessels or to power mill
gear that moves mill blades. Wind turbines have been used to generate electricity since the
early twentieth century. The wind propels a propeller, which turns the rotor of a generator,
which generates power, via a mechanical system. Wind turbines are frequently clustered
together in wind farms to maximize energy efficiency and reduce environmental impact. The
machines have a twenty-year lifetime. Wind energy, also known as wind power, is generated by
employing a wind turbine, which is a device that harnesses the strength of the wind to generate
electricity.
The wind blows the turbine's blades, which are linked to a rotor that further rotates a
generator. Wind turbines are classified into two types: horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWTs)
and vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) (VAWTs). The most prevalent form of the wind turbine
is the HAWT. They often feature two or three long, thin blades, similar to an airplane propeller.
The blades are oriented to face straight towards the wind. VAWTs feature shorter, broader
curved blades that resemble electric mixer beaters.
Individual wind turbines may generate 100 kilowatts of power, which is enough to power a
house. Small wind turbines are also employed in locations such as water pumping facilities.
Wind turbines that are slightly bigger perch on towers that can reach 80 meters (260 feet) in
height and have rotor blades that can reach 40 meters (130 feet) in length. Wind turbines with
rotor blades that are more than 162 meters (531 feet) long can be seen sitting on towers that
rise 240 meters (787 feet) tall.
Uses of wind energy:
Some of the uses of wind energy are mentioned below;
generating electricity
milling grain
pumping water
powering cargo ships (via kites)
reducing carbon footprint
sailing
windsurfing.
land surfing
Once created, power can be utilized, linked to the electrical grid, or stored for later use.
How does a wind turbine generate electricity?
A turbine is a machine that rotates in a moving fluid (liquid or gas) and takes part of its energy.
All types of machines use some type of turbine; From the jet engine
The large rotor blades placed in front of the wind turbine have a curved shape similar to the
airfoil of an airplane wing. When the wind passes over these vanes, it will exert an upward force
on it, which is called "lift" force. Wind is part of kinetic energy
As you can probably guess, the amount of energy a turbine produces depends on the area
swept by the rotor blades. In other words, the longer the rotor blades, the more energy the
turbine produces. It is clear that the wind speed also has a great effect on the production of this
energy; So that if the wind speed doubles, the usable energy available for the turbine will be
eight times, because the wind energy is directly related to the cube of its speed.
Wind speed always changes, so the energy produced from it by a turbine also varies.
Connecting a large number of turbines to each other in wind farms, as well as connecting
several wind farms and forming a national energy grid, will lead to a more stable and reliable
source.
Onshore vs Offshore Wind: Which is Better?
1- Size of wind turbines
2- Energy production
3- Land use
4- Noise Pollution
5- Environment Impact
Cost
There has been a lot of debate about the advantages and disadvantages of onshore and
offshore wind farms. Which is better for the environment, cost-effective, and produces more
energy? This blog post will explore the pros and cons of both types of wind farms.
Offshore wind turbines are typically much larger than onshore turbines. The average offshore
turbine is about twice the height of an onshore turbine, with some even reaching heights of
over 600 feet! This is because offshore winds blow harder and steadier than onshore winds so
that larger turbines can take advantage of this. In the case of onshore wind turbines, there are
a lot of obstacles that can get in the way of the wind, such as trees, buildings, and hills, making
the wind comparatively weaker.
Energy production
Offshore wind farms generally produce more energy than onshore wind farms. This is because
offshore winds are stronger and steadier than onshore winds, allowing the turbines to spin
faster and generate more electricity. Offshore wind farms also have the potential to produce
more energy than onshore wind farms since they can take advantage of much larger turbines.
Land use
Offshore turbines need to be placed far away from shore to avoid interference from boats and
other objects, which means more space is required to install them.
However, this is not a problem since they are installed in the ocean or seas with plenty of
space!
On the other hand, onshore turbines need to be placed on land, sometimes relatively expensive
and difficult to find.
Visual Impact
Offshore wind farms are built far away from shore, so they are not as visible from land.
This means that they have minimal visual impact and do not spoil the landscape’s natural
beauty.
On the other hand, onshore wind farms are typically built near cities and towns.
While some people think that onshore wind farms are unsightly, others find them beautiful.
Some tourists spend money to visit onshore wind farms to see them!
Noise Pollution
Offshore wind turbines are built far away from shore, so the sound of their blades spinning
doesn’t affect people who live near the coast. However, they create underwater noise that can
be disruptive to marine life.
On the other hand, onshore turbines are often built near residential areas. As a result, the noise
from the blades can be noisy and disturb the peace of nearby residents.
Environment Impact
Offshore wind farms have less impact on the environment than onshore wind farms.
This is because they are built far away from shore, so they do not affect the wildlife or
ecosystems near the coast. However, they still have an impact on marine life.
On the other hand, onshore wind farms disturb the wildlife near them and affect the local
ecosystem.
Offshore wind farms are generally more expensive to build than onshore wind farms. This is
because they require specialized equipment and infrastructure that can withstand the harsh
conditions of the ocean, such as strong winds and waves. Additionally, you need to build a
transmission line to connect the offshore wind farm to the grid, which can be very costly On the
other hand, onshore wind farms are much cheaper to build. This is because they are often built
near you can use existing infrastructures, such as roads and transmission lines, to connect them
to the grid.
Advantages and disadvantages of wind turbines
Disadvantages of wind turbine
At first glance, it's hard to think of anything wrong with clean wind power, especially when
compared to polluting coal power or risky nuclear power. But wind energy also has
disadvantages. One of the characteristics of a wind turbine is that it does not produce more
energy than coal, gas or nuclear power plants. A typical new turbine has an output of
approximately 2 MW. This amount of energy is enough to run 1,000 2kW toasters at the same
time, or to power 1,000 homes if it runs 30% of the time.
Currently, the largest offshore turbine can generate around 6 to 8 megawatts of energy, as
turbines at sea are stronger and more continuous. In theory, we need 1000 2MW turbines to
generate power equivalent to a 2000MW nuclear or fossil power plant, but in practice, because
nuclear or fossil power plants produce energy continuously and the wind power is variable,
more wind turbines are needed to Let's reach this capacity.
Finally, wind power is variable and an efficient power grid requires predictable sources of
energy. In practice, this means that the network needs a combination of different resources to
meet the changing demand. Some of these sources operate continuously (such as nuclear
power plants), some supply shortages during peak demand (such as hydroelectric power
plants), and some produce energy only when possible (such as wind turbines). Therefore, wind
energy cannot be used as the only source of energy supply.
As we said, you can't install thousands of turbines close together and expect them to be
efficient. The turbines must have a suitable distance from each other; typically 3 to 5 times the
upwind rotor diameter between both turbines and about 8 to 10 times the downwind rotor
diameter between both turbines at the back and front. Put these two things together and you
get the biggest and most obvious drawback of a wind farm: taking up too much space. If you
want to make a country completely benefit from wind energy so that no other energy source is
needed, you have to cover a very large area with turbines.
Of course, you can still farm the space between the turbines, but each wind turbine takes up
about 5% of the farm space (for the turbine base, road access and grid connection). Many
farmers and landowners object to the new power lines, while others make good money by
renting out their land. In addition, turbines can be installed at sea level, but this itself brings
many problems and costs. Even in onshore turbines, the cost of connecting rows of turbines is
clearly higher than the cost of wiring a single turbine with the same power.
The need for economic subsidies to make wind energy accessible
The added cost of the complexity of the process of regulating the fluctuations of wind energy
with other forms of energy
Additional cost to upgrade the power grid and transmission lines, although the whole system is
profitable.
Variable output, although this problem is reduced by the construction of wind farms in different
areas.
Extensive land occupation, although 95% of the land can be used for agricultural purposes.
Inability to provide all the energy demand of a country throughout the year unlike fossil,
hydroelectric, nuclear and biomass power plants.
Loss of mining and drilling jobs
Advantages of wind turbines
On the positive side, we must say that wind turbines, unlike coal, are clean and green energy
sources. After the construction of wind turbines, there is no pollution caused by carbon dioxide
gas, which causes global warming, or sulfur dioxide, which produces acid rain. You pay once and
after that the energy they produce is endless and free for a lifetime of 25 years (except for
spare parts and maintenance costs). This is more of a bonus than it sounds, as the cost of
running a conventional power plant is highly dependent on high-risk factors such as major oil
and gas prices and energy market volatility.
In the construction of the wind turbine tower and nacelle, some metal and cement are used to
prevent it from falling (an average wind turbine has about 8000 parts), so the construction of
the turbine has environmental impacts. However, looking at their working life, we see that wind
turbines have one of the lowest carbon dioxide production among other sources of energy
production; Considerably much less than fossil plants, less than most solar or biomass plants.
In the meantime, nuclear power plants produce less carbon dioxide than wind power plants,
but wind power plants do not have the problems related to security, pollution, and waste
disposal that are attributed to nuclear power plants, and they are built more quickly and easily.
Also, according to Milligan's report in 2009, wind generated electricity is cheaper per kilowatt
hour; Almost half the price of nuclear power and two thirds of coal power plant. According to
the report of the World Wind Energy Council, a turbine in 3 to 6 months produces and replaces
the energy spent in its entire lifetime (construction, operation and recovery).
The advantages of wind turbines are as follows:
Very low carbon dioxide emissions (only for construction)
No pollution to air and water Absence of environmental effects such as mining and drilling No
payment for fuel fully stable; Unlike fossil fuels, wind never runs out.
Turbines work wherever it is windy enough; Unlike fossil resources that are only found in
certain areas.
Unlike fossil energy sources, wind energy utilization rates are predictable for years.
Lack of dependence on political fluctuations related to oil and gas prices with the increase in
the price of oil and gas, the price of wind power will be competitive.
What are the advantagesand challengesof wind power?
Wind power is one of the fastest-growing energy sources in the world because of its many
advantages. Wind power also presents inherent challenges in some regions of the world, which
are being addressed through research and development (R&D) projects around the globe.
1. Wind power is cost-effective in many regions. In others, wind power needs to compete with
other energy sources, but global R&D efforts are working on solutions to reduce the
levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of both onshore and offshore wind power.
2. Another advantage to wind power is that it is a domestic source of energy, harnessing a
limitless local resource. Some viable locations for wind farms, however, are located remote
areas that would present challenges in construction and electricity transmission logistics.
Technology breakthrough such as two-piece blades and modular construction are helping
overcome such challenges.
3. An additional benefit of wind power is it is a sustainable source of energy, as wind turbine
operation does not directly emit any CO2 or greenhouse gaseshelping countries meet
their emission reduction targets and combating climate change. Wind energy is plentiful,
readily available, and capturing its power does not deplete our valuable natural resources. In
fact, an environmental benefit to wind power is its ability to counter the detrimental effects
of climate change. The Global Wind Energy Outlook projects that by 2030 wind energy will
offset 2.5 billion tons per year of carbon
Clean wind energy storage
Dispatching and delivering clean energy when and where it is needed is important for wind
turbine operators. A battery energy storage solution offers new application flexibility and
unlocks new business value when combined with wind power generation. With clean wind
energy storage, you can help stabilize the electrical grid, control energy flow, optimize asset
operation and create new revenue.
1. Wind is almost everywhere
Not only is wind present almost everywhere on Earth, we also have precise information about
where it blows most frequently and powerfully. It’s a question of availability: since it’s well
known where the wind blows strongest, it’s possible to install wind plants based on our
considerable awareness of the local conditions. The windier an area, the more energy it can
produce, offsetting the costs of the initial investment.
2. Wind power is excellent in remote areas, wherever they may be
Like many other renewable energy sources, wind power is also advantageous because it can be
exploited using micro-grid solutions even in places where there is no connection to the
electricity grid. In more isolated areas far from towns or cities, this offers an important
opportunity because it can lead to significant savings from not having to build expensive
infrastructure. Unlike geothermal or hydroelectric power, wind can be exploited on a global
scale, with the exception of those few areas in which it is not beneficial to install wind turbines.
3. Wind is consistent in the medium and long-term
Often the intermittency of the wind from one moment to another or one day to the next is
brought up as one of the drawbacks of wind power. However, just as with solar power, there is
another side to this coin: wind does not generally depend on specific times of day or the
alternation of day and night, while it does have a seasonal or annual rhythm. So, on the whole,
it’s a resource that in the medium to long-term offers an excellent guarantee of regularity,
distinguishing itself with a variability that does not follow the same pattern as solar energy.
4. Excellent conversion efficiency
The transformation of wind power into electricity has already reached impressive performance
levels. Efficiency ranges from 40% to 50%: very close to the maximum theoretical level, which
according to Betz’s law is 59%.
5. Wind power occupies very little land
Even though they’re installed on land, wind turbines do not take up much space.
The blades extend vertically and the size at the base is almost negligible, especially compared
with photovoltaic plants, which makes wind power compatible with other uses of the land at
the same time.
6. The environmental impact is minimal
Although the visual aspect and the low level of noise pollution caused by the rotation of the
turbine blades are still a work in progress in order to make wind plants even more
environmentally friendly, it’s worth noting that the actual impact today is, nonetheless,
extremely limited. Wind power is, in fact, the green source with the lowest overall
impact because any emissions and consumption of resources is limited solely to the production,
transport and installation of the plant. Moreover, in many countries there are certifications that
must be obtained prior to beginning work on a wind power project, in order to ensure that any
collateral effects on flora and fauna are kept to a minimum. While in the majority of cases wind
turbines are installed on mountains, on hills or at sea, when they are located in fields or on
gentle inclines, the land can still be used for cultivating crops or as pasture for animals, without
creating any disturbance to either activity.
7. A green source that is truly economical
Compared to other energy sources, wind power has very low installation and operating costs.
Construction times are short: from two to twenty-four months depending on the size of the
plant. Moreover, technological advances are driving costs down even further, with a cost per
kilowatt hour of energy produced that has become negligible. Finally, wind power is
increasingly accessible thanks in part to national incentives, which have reduced the cost to the
end user and reduced costs more generally, thanks to the increasingly low cost of this
technology.
8. Maintenance is simple and only occasionally necessary
Keeping a wind plant running is very simple. Unless there are breakages or exceptional events,
which are nonetheless increasingly rare thanks to models that are more and more reliable and
digital monitoring systems that are enabling ever higher performance levels, maintenance is
minimal and inexpensive. In fact, towers and turbines can stay in operation for years without
needing any interventions; with small adjustments they can continue to operate for periods in
excess of twenty years.
9. Excellent circularity in the end-of-life phase
It can be said that wind plants are almost perfectly reversible. At the end of their working lives,
it’s possible to recover practically everything: the land on which they are positioned can be
completely returned to its former state, the plant itself can be dismantled into its basic
components and the materials can then be recycled in the future. In fact, the same raw
materials can be used to create a new latest generation plant, in line with the circular
economy model.
10. The opportunities for domestic wind power
Even on a significantly reduced scale, for example for an individual home, wind power can offer
numerous advantages. Thanks to mini-wind power and micro-wind power (systems of up to 200
kilowatts and 20 kilowatts, respectively), the power of the wind can be exploited at the
domestic level to cover the energy needs of a building or a family. Typically, domestic wind
power is used in combination with other green sources like solar or geothermal to take
advantage of the benefits offered by each.
The prospects for the future
Compared to other energy sources, whether green or not, wind power is already
a mature technology, perhaps because it has been harnessed in various forms for millennia.
There are some aspects that we’re still working on, however: especially to improve some
specific characteristics of how this technology functions. For example, solutions are being
developed to counter the accumulation of ice on turbine blades, which can reduce efficiency
and increase wear and tear.
Another issue that is a focus of innovation is the question of installing plants in a way that is
harmonious with the surrounding landscape. In addition, for the future, there is increasing
interest in floating offshore wind plants, where neither people nor fish will be disturbed by their
existence. All of this makes wind power an even more perfect technology on the road
to decarburization and sustainability.
Conclusion:
Many of the benefits of wind power are common to other renewables. First of all is its role in
combatting climate change: exploiting wind power means reducing the use of fossil fuels,
thereby cutting emissions of carbon dioxide, fine particles and other climate altering substances
responsible for the greenhouse effect. Furthermore, wind power can also help achieve energy
self-sufficiency, offering undeniable economic benefits for the countries that adopt it while also
being a step in the direction of sustainable development because it is essentially free once the
wind turbine has been installed. Moreover, wind is an abundant source of energy that is both
inexhaustible and unlimited over time, available on most parts of the Earth’s surface.
Among the particular features of wind power that make it such a promising form of green
energy is the possibility to use it in combination with solar power. In addition to coexisting at
the same plant, the two forms of energy also have several features that are complementary.
There are, however, some aspects of wind power that distinguish it from other renewables like
hydroelectric, geothermal and solar power. We’ve organized these into 10 points to
demonstrate how, moving forward, wind power can become the second most important green
energy source worldwide and the protagonist of a sustainable future for many countries.
References:
Aird, J. A., Barthelmie, R. J., Shepherd, T. J., and Pryor, S. C.: Occurrence of Low-Level Jets over
the Eastern U.S. Coastal Zone at Heights Relevant to Wind Energy, Energies, 15, 445, 2022.
Alvera-Azcárate, A., Barth, A., Rixen, M., and Beckers, J. M.: Reconstruction of incomplete
oceanographic data sets using empirical orthogonal functions: application to the Adriatic Sea
surface temperature, Ocean Model., 9, 325346 , 2005.
Banta, R. M., Pichugina, Y. L., Brewer, W. A., James, E. P., Olson, J. B., Benjamin, S. G., Carley, J.
R., Bianco, L., Djalalova, I. V., Wilczak, J. M., Hardesty, R. M., Cline, J., and Marquis, M. C.:
Evaluating and Improving NWP Forecast Models for the Future: How the Needs of Offshore
Wind Energy Can Point the Way, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 11551176, 2018.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management: Outer Continental Shelf Renewable Energy Leases Map
Book (last access: 19 December 2022), 2018.
Byun, D., Kim, S., Cheng, F.-Y., Kim, H.-C., and Ngan, F.: Improved Modeling Inputs: Land Use
and Sea-Surface Temperature, Final Report, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (last
access: 19 December 2022), 2007.
Chen, F., Miao, S., Tewari, M., Bao, J.-W., and Kusaka, H.: A numerical study of interactions
between surface forcing and sea breeze circulations and their effects on stagnation in the
greater Houston area, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D12105, , 2011.
Chen, Z., Curchitser, E., Chant, R., and Kang, D.: Seasonal Variability of the Cold Pool Over the
Mid-Atlantic Bight Continental Shelf, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 82038226, 2018.
Chin, T. M., Vazquez-Cuervo, J., and Armstrong, E. M.: A multi-scale high-resolution analysis of
global sea surface temperature, Remote Sens. Environ., 200, 154169, 2017.
Colle, B. A. and Novak, D. R.: The New York Bight Jet: Climatology and Dynamical Evolution,
Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 23852404, 2010.
Debnath, M., Doubrawa, P., Optis, M., Hawbecker, P., and Bodini, N.: Extreme wind shear
events in US offshore wind energy areas and the role of induced stratification, Wind Energ. Sci.,
6, 10431059, 2021.
Donlon, C. J., Martin, M., Stark, J., Roberts-Jones, J., Fiedler, E., and Wimmer, W.: The
Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis (OSTIA) system, Remote Sens.
Environ., 116, 140158, 2012.
Dragaud, I. C. D. V., Soares da Silva, M., Assad, L. P. d. F., Cataldi, M., Landau, L., Elias, R. N., and
Pimentel, L. C. G.: The impact of SST on the wind and air temperature simulations: a case study
for the coastal region of the Rio de Janeiro state, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 131, 10831097, ,
2019.
Fiedler, E. K., Mao, C., Good, S. A., Waters, J., and Martin, M. J.: Improvements to feature
resolution in the OSTIA sea surface temperature analysis using the NEMOVAR assimilation
scheme, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 36093625, 2019.
Gerber, H., Chang, S., and Holt, T.: Evolution of a Marine Boundary-Layer Jet, J. Atmos. Sci., 46,
13121326, 1989.
Källstrand, B.: Low level jets in a marine boundary layer during spring, Contrib. Atmos. Phys.,
71, 359373, 1998.
Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The
Lantz, E. J., Roberts, J. O., Nunemaker, J., DeMeo, E., Dykes, K. L., and Scott, G. N.: Increasing
Wind Turbine Tower Heights: Opportunities and Challenges, United States, OSTI technical
report NREL/TP-5000-73629, NREL, 2019.
Li, H., Claremar, B., Wu, L., Hallgren, C., Körnich, H., Ivanell, S., and Sahlée, E.: A sensitivity study
of the WRF model in offshore wind modeling over the Baltic Sea, Geosci. Front., 12,
101229, 2021.
Lombardo, K., Sinsky, E., Edson, J., Whitney, M. M., and Jia, Y.: Sensitivity of Offshore Surface
Fluxes and Sea Breezes to the Spatial Distribution of Sea-Surface Temperature, Bound.-Lay.
Meteorol., 166, 475502, 2018.
Miller, S. T. K., Keim, B. D., Talbot, R. W., and Mao, H.: Sea breeze: Structure, forecasting, and
impacts, Rev. Geophys., 41, 1011, , 2003.
Murphy, P., Lundquist, J. K., and Fleming, P.: How wind speed shear and directional veer affect
the power production of a megawatt-scale operational wind turbine, Wind Energ. Sci., 5, 1169
1190, 2020.
... To meet these demanding requirements, composite materials are the go-to choice for constructing wind turbine blades. This review will explore the various types of composite materials used in wind turbine blades and the key considerations when choosing the right material for the job [33]. ...
Article
Full-text available
With the global shift towards renewable energy sources, the wind energy industry has seen remarkable advancements in recent years. One of the key development areas has been the materials used for wind turbine blades. The integration of advanced composite materials has played a pivotal role in enhancing these blades' performance, efficiency, and durability. This review aims to explore the recent advances and future perspectives of composite materials for wind energy turbine blades. Recent advances in composite materials have significantly improved the performance and durability of wind energy turbine blades, enabling the development of larger and more efficient turbines. The use of advanced composite materials, such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP), has led to increased structural integrity, reduced weight, and improved fatigue resistance. Moreover, researchers are exploring new composite material combinations, such as hybrid CFRP-GFRP and basalt fiber reinforced polymers (BFRP), to further enhance properties like impact resistance and corrosion protection. Future perspectives include the development of smart composites with integrated sensors and self-healing capabilities, as well as the use of 3D printing technology to create complex composite structures with tailored properties. These advancements have the potential to enable the development of even larger and more efficient wind turbines, ultimately driving down the cost of wind energy and increasing its share in the global energy mix. In this study, the historical development of composite materials in the production of wind energy turbine blades is reviewed. Specifically, the work is focused on the composite materials used for manufacturing wind energy blades and the level of penetration of composites in the rotor and blades while mentioning some recent developments in composite selection, design, and structure and focusing on the characterization and testing of composite parts. Finally, a novel approach for improving the reliability, life, and sustainability of wind energy blades is highlighted, mentioning opportunities for future research in the area of wind energy composite materials.
Article
Full-text available
As the offshore wind industry emerges on the US East Coast, a comprehensive understanding of the wind resource – particularly extreme events – is vital to the industry's success. Such understanding has been hindered by a lack of publicly available wind profile observations in offshore wind energy areas. However, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority recently funded the deployment of two floating lidars within two current lease areas off the coast of New Jersey. These floating lidars provide publicly available wind speed data from 20 to 200 m height with a 20 m vertical resolution. In this study, we leverage a year of these lidar data to quantify and characterize the frequent occurrence of high-wind-shear and low-level-jet events, both of which will have a considerable impact on turbine operation. In designing a detection algorithm for these events, we find that the typical, non-dimensional power-law-based wind shear exponent is insufficient to identify many of these extreme, high-wind-speed events. Rather, we find that the simple vertical gradient of wind speed better captures the events. Based on this detection method, we find that almost 100 independent events occur throughout the year with mean wind speed at 100 m height and wind speed gradient of 16 m s-1 and 0.05 s-1, respectively. The events have strong seasonal variability, with the highest number of events in summer and the lowest in winter. A detailed analysis reveals that these events are enabled by an induced stable stratification when warmer air from the south flows over the colder mid-Atlantic waters, leading to a positive air–sea temperature difference.
Article
Full-text available
Accurate wind modeling is important for wind resources assessment and wind power forecasting. To improve the WRF model configuration for the offshore wind modeling over the Baltic Sea, this study performed a sensitivity study of the WRF model to multiple model configurations, including domain setup, grid resolution, sea surface temperature, land surface data, and atmosphere-wave coupling. The simulated offshore wind was evaluated against LiDAR observations under different wind directions, atmospheric stabilities, and sea status. Generally, the simulated wind profiles matched observations, despite systematic underestimations. Strengthening the forcing from the reanalysis data through reducing the number of nested domains played the largest role in improving wind modeling. Atmosphere-wave coupling further improved the simulated wind, especially under the growing and mature sea conditions. Increasing the vertical resolution, and updating the sea surface temperature and the land surface information only had a slight impact, mainly visible during very stable conditions. Increasing the horizontal resolution also only had a slight impact, most visible during unstable conditions. Our study can help to improve the wind resources assessment and wind power forecasting over the Baltic Sea.
Article
Full-text available
Most megawatt-scale wind turbines align themselves into the wind as defined by the wind speed at or near the center of the rotor (hub height). However, both wind speed and wind direction can change with height across the area swept by the turbine blades. A turbine aligned to hub-height winds might experience suboptimal or superoptimal power production, depending on the changes in the vertical profile of wind, also known as shear. Using observed winds and power production over 6 months at a site in the high plains of North America, we quantify the sensitivity of a wind turbine's power production to wind speed shear and directional veer as well as atmospheric stability. We measure shear using metrics such as α (the log-law wind shear exponent), βbulk (a measure of bulk rotor-disk-layer veer), βtotal (a measure of total rotor-disk-layer veer), and rotor-equivalent wind speed (REWS; a measure of actual momentum encountered by the turbine by accounting for shear). We also consider the REWS with the inclusion of directional veer, REWSθ, although statistically significant differences in power production do not occur between REWS and REWSθ at our site. When REWS differs from the hub-height wind speed (as measured by either the lidar or a transfer function-corrected nacelle anemometer), the turbine power generation also differs from the mean power curve in a statistically significant way. This change in power can be more than 70 kW or up to 5 % of the rated power for a single 1.5 MW utility-scale turbine. Over a theoretical 100-turbine wind farm, these changes could lead to instantaneous power prediction gains or losses equivalent to the addition or loss of multiple utility-scale turbines. At this site, REWS is the most useful metric for segregating the turbine's power curve into high and low cases of power production when compared to the other shear or stability metrics. Therefore, REWS enables improved forecasts of power production.
Article
Full-text available
The data assimilation scheme used in the Met Office's Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Ice Analysis (OSTIA) system has been updated from an Optimal Interpolation (OI)‐type scheme to a variational assimilation scheme. The updated system includes a dual length‐scale background error correlation operator, and a flow‐dependent component to adjust the length‐scale combination in favour of the short scale in regions of high sea surface temperature (SST) variability. The variational assimilation scheme improves both the analysis performance and the representation of SST features in the OSTIA analysis compared to the OI scheme of the original system. The results of spectral analysis, assessment of horizontal SST gradients and the response of an atmospheric model to the OSTIA SST analysis as a boundary condition indicate that the flow‐dependent formulation successfully contributes to improvements in the feature resolution capability of the analysis. Overall, using a short length‐scale of 15 km and including a flow‐dependent adjustment component produces the best results compared to using either 40 km or the first Rossby radius of deformation as the short length‐scale. The new system successfully captures realistic ocean variability without introducing noise into the analysis, allowing the feature resolution capability of the new system to out‐perform that of other comparable SST analysis products.
Article
Full-text available
The impact of Sea Surface Temperature (SST) on the wind and air temperature numerical simulations over the coastal region of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was investigated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. The study period comprised January 24–26, 2014, characterized by the occurrence of coastal upwelling. Two numerical experiments were performed. The first, called EGFS, used the Global Forecast System (GFS) results to prescribe the initial and boundary conditions. In the second, called EMUR, the SST was replaced by the Multi-scale Ultra-high-Resolution SST (MUR SST). The experiments showed significant differences between the SST fields, being higher than 10 °C. Through the comparison with observations, we verified that the upwelling was better represented in the EMUR, which consequently generated improvements in the temperature at 2 m above ground level (AGL) over this region. In the offshore region, over areas with higher SST, the wind speed at 10 m AGL was stronger, and opposite behavior was observed over low SST areas. In addition, in regions with higher SST differences between the experiments, differences of wind direction at 10 m AGL higher than 90° were detected. The SST influence on the air temperature and wind speed profiles was significant up to 300 and 900 m, respectively. The comparisons between the wind observations with the numerical results show that the land–sea breeze simulation (thermal forced) was underestimated in relation to the synoptic forcing (South Atlantic Subtropical Anticyclone), even with significant SST differences between experiments.
Article
Full-text available
To advance the understanding of meteorological processes in offshore coastal regions, the spatial variability of wind profiles must be characterized and uncertainties (errors) in NWP model wind forecasts quantified. These gaps are especially critical for the new offshore wind energy industry, where wind profile measurements in the marine atmospheric layer spanned by wind turbine rotor blades, generally 50–200 m above mean sea level (MSL), have been largely unavailable. Here, high-quality wind profile measurements were available every 15 min from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA/ESRL)’s high-resolution Doppler lidar (HRDL) during a monthlong research cruise in the Gulf of Maine for the 2004 New England Air Quality Study. These measurements were compared with retrospective NWP model wind forecasts over the area using two NOAA forecast-modeling systems [North American Mesoscale Forecast System (NAM) and Rapid Refresh (RAP)]. HRDL profile measurements quantified model errors, including their dependence on height above sea level, diurnal cycle, and forecast lead time. Typical model wind speed errors were ∼2.5 m s−1, and vector-wind errors were ∼4 m s−1. Short-term forecast errors were larger near the surface—30% larger below 100 m than above and largest for several hours after local midnight (biased low). Longer-term, 12-h forecasts had the largest errors after local sunset (biased high). At more than 3-h lead times, predictions from finer-resolution models exhibited larger errors. Horizontal variability of winds, measured as the ship traversed the Gulf of Maine, was significant and raised questions about whether modeled fields, which appeared smooth in comparison, were capturing this variability. If not, horizontal arrays of high-quality, vertical-profiling devices will be required for wind energy resource assessment offshore. Such measurement arrays are also needed to improve NWP models.
Article
Full-text available
A series of numerical sensitivity experiments is performed to quantify the impact of sea-surface temperature (SST) distribution on offshore surface fluxes and simulated sea-breeze dynamics. The SST simulations of two mid-latitude sea-breeze events over coastal New England are performed using a spatially-uniform SST, as well as spatially-varying SST datasets of 32- and 1-km horizontal resolutions. Offshore surface heat and buoyancy fluxes vary in response to the SST distribution. Local sea-breeze circulations are relatively insensitive, with minimal differences in vertical structure and propagation speed among the experiments. The largest thermal perturbations are confined to the lowest 10% of the sea-breeze column due to the relatively high stability of the mid-Atlantic marine atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) suppressing vertical mixing, resulting in the depth of the marine layer remaining unchanged. Minimal impacts on the column-averaged virtual potential temperature and sea-breeze depth translates to small changes in sea-breeze propagation speed. This indicates that the use of datasets with a fine-scale SST may not produce more accurate sea-breeze simulations in highly stable marine ABL regimes, though may prove more beneficial in less stable sub-tropical environments.
Article
The Mid-Atlantic Bight (MAB) Cold Pool is a distinctive cold (lower than 10 °C) and relatively fresh (lower than 34 practical salinity unit) water mass. It is located over the middle and outer shelf of the MAB, below the seasonal thermocline, and is attached to the bottom. Following this definition, we put forward a method that includes three criteria to capture and quantify Cold Pool characteristics, based on a 50-year (1958–2007) high-resolution regional ocean model hindcast. The seasonal climatology of the Cold Pool and its properties are investigated during its onset-peak-decline cycle. Three stages of the Cold Pool event are defined according to its evolution and characteristics. The Cold Pool cores travel along the 60-m isobath starting south of the New England shelf to the Hudson Shelf Valley at a speed of 2–3 cm/s. Furthermore, the northern extent of the Cold Pool retreats about 2.6 times faster than the southern extent during the summer progression. The heat balance of near-bottom waters over the MAB and Georges Bank is computed and it is found that the heat advection, rather than vertical diffusion, dominates the resulting spatial patterns of warming. Possible origins of the Cold Pool are investigated by performing a lead-lag correlation analysis. Results suggest that the Cold Pool originates not only from local remnants of winter water near the Nantucket Shoals, but has an upstream source traveling in the spring time from the southwestern flank of the Georges Bank along the 80-m isobath.
Article
The Multi-scale Ultra-high Resolution (MUR) sea surface temperature (SST) analysis presents daily SST estimates on a global 0.01° ×0.01° grid. The current version (Version 4.1, http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/GHGMR-4FJ04) features the 1-km resolution MODIS retrievals, which are fused with AVHRR GAC, microwave, and in-situ SST data by applying internal correction for relative biases among the data sets. Only the night-time (dusk to dawn locally) satellite SST retrievals are used to estimate the foundation SST. The MUR SST values agree with the GHRSST Multi-Product Ensemble (GMPE) SST field to 0.36°C on average, except in summer-time Arctic region where the existing SST analysis products are known to disagree with each other. The feature resolution of the MUR SST analysis is an order of magnitude higher than most existing analysis products. The Multi-Resolution Variational Analysis (MRVA) method allows the MUR analysis to use multiple synoptic time scales, including a 5-day data window used for reconstruction of mesoscale features and data windows of only few hours for the smaller scale features. Reconstruction of fast evolving small scale features and interpolation over persistent large data voids can be achieved simultaneously by the use of multiple synoptic windows in the multi-scale setting. The MRVA method is also a “mesh-less” interpolation procedure that avoids truncation of the geolocation data during gridding and binning of satellite samples. Future improvements of the MUR SST analysis will include ingestion of day-time MODIS retrievals as well as more recent high-resolution SST retrievals from VIIRS.
Article
Pilot balloon trackings were performed at the coast of a small island in the Baltic Sea on 52 days during spring 1991, in order to study the occurrence of Low Level Jets (LLJs). 73% of the pibal profiles showed a more or less distinct wind maximum. About 2/3 of the jetlike profiles have been identified to result from an inertial oscillation in space wich develops due to frictional decoupling of the upper boundary layer flow over the relatively cold sea surface. the increase of the wind speed at different heights due to the evolution of the LLJ has been estimated from a comparison of the observed wind profiles with model results using a parameterized one-dimensional boundary layer wind model. Effects of the LLJ on the wind energy potential in the Baltic region are discussed. The estimated increase of the mean wind speed corresponds to a wind energy potential of 24% and 40% at 75 m and 125 m, respectively, for the studied measurements.