ArticlePublisher preview availableLiterature Review
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Background There is robust evidence that creatine monohydrate supplementation can enhance short-term high-intensity exercise in athletes. However, the effect of creatine monohydrate supplementation on aerobic performance and its role during aerobic activities is still controversial. Objective The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the supplementation effects of creatine monohydrate on endurance performance in a trained population. Methods The search strategy in this systematic review and meta-analysis was designed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were explored from inception until 19 May, 2022. Only human experimental trials, controlled with a placebo group, evaluating the effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation on endurance performance in a trained population were analyzed in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Results A total of 13 studies satisfied all the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results for the pooled meta-analysis showed a non-significant change in endurance performance after creatine monohydrate supplementation in a trained population (p = 0.47), with a trivial negative effect (pooled standardized mean difference = − 0.07 [95% confidence interval − 0.32 to 0.18]; I² = 34.75%). Further, after excluding the studies not evenly distributed around the base of the funnel plot, the results were similar (pooled standardized mean difference = − 0.07 [95% confidence interval − 0.27 to 0.13]; I² = 0%; p = 0.49). Conclusions Creatine monohydrate supplementation was shown to be ineffective on endurance performance in a trained population. Clinical Trial Registration The study protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) with the following registration number: CRD42022327368.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Sports Medicine (2023) 53:1017–1027
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01823-2
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Effects ofCreatine Monohydrate onEndurance Performance
inaTrained Population: ASystematic Review andMeta‑analysis
JulenFernández‑Landa1,2 · AsierSantibañez‑Gutierrez1,2· NikolaTodorovic2· ValdemarStajer2·
SergejM.Ostojic2,3
Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published online: 6 March 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023
Abstract
Background There is robust evidence that creatine monohydrate supplementation can enhance short-term high-intensity
exercise in athletes. However, the effect of creatine monohydrate supplementation on aerobic performance and its role during
aerobic activities is still controversial.
Objective The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the supplementation effects of creatine
monohydrate on endurance performance in a trained population.
Methods The search strategy in this systematic review and meta-analysis was designed following Preferred Reporting Items
for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus
databases were explored from inception until 19 May, 2022. Only human experimental trials, controlled with a placebo
group, evaluating the effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation on endurance performance in a trained population
were analyzed in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated
using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.
Results A total of 13 studies satisfied all the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-
analysis. The results for the pooled meta-analysis showed a non-significant change in endurance performance after creatine
monohydrate supplementation in a trained population (p = 0.47), with a trivial negative effect (pooled standardized mean
difference = − 0.07 [95% confidence interval − 0.32 to 0.18]; I2 = 34.75%). Further, after excluding the studies not evenly
distributed around the base of the funnel plot, the results were similar (pooled standardized mean difference = 0.07 [95%
confidence interval 0.27 to 0.13]; I2 = 0%; p = 0.49).
Conclusions Creatine monohydrate supplementation was shown to be ineffective on endurance performance in a trained
population.
Clinical Trial Registration The study protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO)
with the following registration number: CRD42022327368.
* Julen Fernández-Landa
julenfdl@hotmail.com
1 Physical Education andSports Department, Faculty
ofEducation andSport, University oftheBasque Country
(UPV/EHU), Vitoria, Spain
2 Applied Bioenergetics Lab, Faculty ofSport andPhysical
Education, University ofNovi Sad, NoviSad, Serbia
3 Department ofNutrition andPublic Health, University
ofAgder, Kristiansand, Norway
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Despite the abovementioned evidence, the effects of creatine supplementation in the context of endurance sports remain largely unexplored. A recent meta-analysis found that creatine supplementation exerts no significant beneficial effects on endurance performance as assessed with 'classic' indicators such as the lactate threshold, maximum oxygen uptake (VO 2max ), time trial (TT) performance, or time to exhaustion [18]. However, given its potential to facilitate ATP resynthesis while also buffering hydrogen ion accumulation, it has been recently hypothesized that, despite potential increases in body mass, creatine supplementation might be effective to improve endurance performance, particularly in those endurance sports involving repeated high-intensity efforts [19]. ...
... Despite the growing popularity of creatine in endurance sports [19], evidence remains scarce and inconclusive. In fact, a recent meta-analysis including 13 studies found that creatine supplementation does not improve endurance performance [18]. It is worth noting, however, that the indicators used for the assessment of endurance performance Data are shown as mean ± SD. ...
... might play a major role. For instance, in the aforementioned meta-analysis Fernández-Landa et al. combined different indicators such as the lactate threshold-associated PO, time to exhaustion or VO 2max on an incremental test, or performance during a running, swimming or rowing TT [18]. Moreover, different populations were studied, including rugby, handball or soccer players, rowers, and swimmers [18]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Growing evidence supports the ergogenic effects of creatine supplementation on muscle power/strength, but its effects on endurance performance remain unclear. We assessed the effects of high-dose short-term creatine supplementation in professional cyclists during a training camp. Methods The study followed a double-blind, randomized parallel design. Twenty-three professional U23 cyclists (19 ± 1 years, maximum oxygen uptake: 73.0 ± 4.6 mL/kg/min) participated in a 6-day training camp. Participants were randomized to consume daily either a recovery drink (containing carbohydrates and protein) with a 20-g creatine supplement (creatine group, n = 11) or just the recovery drink (placebo group, n = 12). Training loads and dietary intake were monitored, and indicators of fatigue/recovery (Hooper index, countermovement jump height), body composition, and performance (10-second sprint, 3-, 6-, and 12-minute time trials, respectively, as well as critical power and W’) were assessed as study outcomes. Results The training camp resulted in a significant (p < 0.001) increase of training loads (+50% for total training time and + 61% for training stress score, compared with the preceding month) that in turn induced an increase in fatigue indicators (significant time effect [p < 0.001] for delayed-onset muscle soreness, fatigue, and total Hooper index) and a decrease in performance (significant time effect [p = 0.020] for critical power, which decreased by −3.8%). However, no significant group-by-time interaction effect was found for any of the study outcomes (all p > 0.05). Conclusions High-dose short-term creatine supplementation seems to exert no consistent beneficial effects on recovery, body composition or performance indicators during a strenuous training period in professional cyclists.
... Such sports may benefit from creatine supplementation, as it supports both quick energy release during intense efforts and recovery during lowerintensity phases [61]. Conversely, current evidence indicates that creatine supplementation may be ineffective in endurance performance [62]. ...
... Different studies show that creatine supplementation does not increase maximal oxygen consumption, submaximal oxygen consumption, or time trial performance [14,16], due to the fact that the percentage of the phosphogenic energy pathway is low [44], with the energy pathways of fat and carbohydrate oxidation being more in demand. Although it has been suggested that the water retention associated with creatine supplementation could enhance endurance performance, this mechanism has been shown to be ineffective in most studies examining creatine supplementation in endurance athletes [62]. Another justification for the absence of an ergogenic effect in sports with a high aerobic component is the fact that the increase in the body mass of the subjects after treatment with creatine would lead to a possible neutralization of the beneficial effects, with body mass being of great relevance in these sports for optimal efficiency [69]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Creatine monohydrate supplementation is widely used by athletes in high-intensity, power-based sports due to its ability to enhance short-term performance by increasing intramuscular phosphocreatine (PCr) stores, which aid in ATP resynthesis during intense muscle contractions. However, emerging evidence suggests that creatine monohydrate offers benefits beyond athletic performance. This narrative review explores the literature supporting the advantages of creatine supplementation in women, vegans, and clinical populations. In women, who typically have lower baseline intramuscular creatine levels, supplementation may help alleviate fatigue-related symptoms associated with the menstrual cycle, particularly during the early follicular and luteal phases. For vegans and vegetarians, who often have reduced creatine stores due to the absence of creatine-rich animal products in their diet, supplementation can improve both physical and cognitive performance while supporting adherence to plant-based diets. Additionally, creatine supplementation holds potential for various clinical populations. It may mitigate muscle wasting in conditions such as sarcopenia and cachexia, support neuroprotection in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Huntington’s, improve exercise capacity in cardiovascular diseases, and enhance energy metabolism in chronic fatigue syndrome. Creatine may also aid recovery from traumatic brain injury by promoting brain energy metabolism and reducing neuronal damage. In conclusion, creatine monohydrate supplementation can enhance physical performance, cognitive function, and overall health in women, vegans, and clinical populations by addressing creatine deficiencies, improving energy metabolism, and supporting recovery from physical and neurological challenges. Most available evidence supports the effectiveness of creatine monohydrate, which should be considered the preferred form of creatine supplementation over other variants. Additionally, proper creatine dosing is essential to maximize benefits and minimize potential adverse effects that may arise from chronic ingestion of excessively high doses.
... Consequently, creatine supplementation is widely utilized by athletes across various sports disciplines including team sports such as football, soccer, basketball and volleyball [2]. Substantial 11 evidence indicates that supplementation with creatine monohydrate can improve performance in short-duration, high-intensity exercise among athletes [18]. The ability of creatine to enhance multiple aspects of exercise performance is extensively supported by scientific evidence. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Creatine monohydrate is one of the most researched and tested supplements in sport known for its benefits on muscle strength, muscle mass gain and training performance. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from various studies to evaluate the impact of creatine monohydrate supplementation on the following outcomes. Aim of the study: To assess the effects of creatine monohydrate supplementation on muscle strength, muscle mass gain and training performance by summarizing evidence from case studies, clinical trials and long term research. State of knowledge: Studies confirm that creatine monohydrate supplementation effectively enhances athletic performance, accelerates recovery, increases muscle strength and muscle mass gain. Additionally, it offers therapeutic advantages for neurodegenerative diseases, type 2 diabetes, aging and various chronic conditions. Material and methods: A review and analysis of randomized clinical trials and clinical studies from 2017 to 2025 available in PubMed. Conclusions: Research findings indicate that long term creatine monohydrate supplementation demonstrates a positive impact on muscle strength, muscle mass gain and training performance. The evidence suggests that creatine enhances strength and hypertrophy of the muscle fibers, improves recovery, exercise capacity and high-intensity performance. These benefits make creatine monohydrate a valuable, safe and well-researched supplement for professional and amateur athletes, regardless of age and gender.
... The participants in our study reported side effects from supplement consumption, including gastralgia, dehydration, and fatigue, consistent with other studies. For example, Fernández-Landa et al. [49] observed slight negative effects of supplements on endurance in trained populations, while Poortmans and Francaux [50] noted that excessive intake of amino-group substances like creatine can strain the liver and kidneys. A case study described a 27-year-old male who developed jaundice after consuming creatine for eight to nine months and whey protein four weeks prior to symptom onset [51]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background/Objectives: The use of dietary supplements (DSs) has become common among fitness enthusiasts, aiming to enhance performance, recovery, and overall well-being. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the city of Beni Mellal from April to July 2024, assessed dietary practices, motivations for supplement use, and associated adverse effects among 420 survey participants. Results: The majority of dietary supplement users were aged 25–64 and had higher education levels. Colopathy (67.38%) was the most common eating disorder, followed by digestive (59.46%), inflammatory, and rheumatic diseases (53.50%). Dietary supplementation prevalence was 88.1%, with proteins (60.81%), medicinal plants (45.13%), and vitamins (42.70%) being the most consumed. Key motivations included supporting muscle, bone, and joint strength (musculoskeletal) (83.78%) and enhancing heart and lung function for cardiorespiratory health (82.43%). However, 28% of protein users experienced adverse effects, such as myalgia, gastralgia, palpitations, and insomnia. Multivariate linear regression indicated a significant negative association of creatine with effectiveness (β = −0.485, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Overall, while the benefits of dietary and sports practices are evident, the adverse effects associated with protein supplements highlight the necessity for enhanced nutrivigilance and nutritional education to ensure safe supplements.
... Our meta-analysis revealed a novel finding that Cr supplementation did not significantly affect 50 m time, 100 m time, or overall time in repeated interval swimming (Fig. 3). This result aligns with Fernández-Landa et al. (2023) meta-analyses, which indicated that Cr supplementation had no significant impact on endurance performance [45]. This might be due to Cr's action at the peripheral muscle level. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Although recent studies have increasingly focused on examining the potential benefits of creatine supplementation to improve performance in swimming events, the impact of creatine supplementation on swimming performance remains a topic of debate and controversy. A comprehensive meta-analytical review was undertaken to evaluate the effects of creatine supplementation on the performance, physiological response, and body composition among swimmers. Methods The research methodology adhered strictly to the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases (Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus) until March 23, 2024. Eligible studies that investigated the impact of creatine supplementation on swimming time, physiological parameters, and body composition in swimmers were included. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was employed to determine the collective effect and assess variations across distinct subgroups defined by swimming time, physiological metrics, and body composition. Meta-regression analysis was conducted on datasets comprising ten or more studies. Standardized mean differences (SMD) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. To evaluate the methodological rigor of the included studies, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was utilized. Results The systematic review included seventeen studies with a total of 361 subjects. No significant differences were observed in the overall effect during single sprint swimming (SMD: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.26, 0.15; p = 0.61), repeated interval swimming (SMD: -0.11; 95% CI: -0.46, 0.25; p = 0.56), physiological response (SMD: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.16, 0.23; p = 0.71), and body composition (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.41; p = 0.12) between creatine and placebo groups. Conclusions Creatine supplementation exhibited ineffectiveness in enhancing the performance, physiological response, and body composition among swimmers.
... Furthermore, for those cases in which more than one outcome measure per study was included to evaluate PA changes, the "MAd" package was employed, which reduces errors that affect the weight that the metaanalysis attributes to each study [26]. Therefore, a single estimation of the effect size was calculated [27] applying a within-study correlation of 0.7 [28]. Baseline and follow-up means in PA were used to obtain a weighted estimation of standardized mean difference (SMD) as Hedges'G [29] and were classified as trivial (< 0.2), small (0.2-0.3), moderate (0.4-0.8) or large (> 0.8) according with Cohen's criteria [30]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the long-term effect of combined physical activity (PA) and behaviour change techniques (BCT) interventions in PA maintenance of colorectal cancer survivors (CRCS) and identify the most frequent BCT implemented in them. Methods PRISMA recommendations were followed. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials up to October 2023. Studies in which CRCS completed a PA intervention based on any Theoretical Model of Behaviour Change (TMBC) and a subsequent follow-up period were included. Between-group differences at baseline and after follow-up were pooled for meta-analysis. BCT codification was performed using the BCT taxonomy v1. Methodological quality and evidence certainty were also assessed. Results Five studies involving 906 CRCS met the inclusion criteria. PA interventions applying BCT showed a significant change with a small positive effect (pooled SMD = 0.22 (0.09, 0.35)) on the PA after a follow-up period between 3 and 12 months. Twenty-two different BCTs were identified (mean 17.2, range 15–19) of which 12 were common across all interventions. Conclusions PA and BCT interventions have been found to be effective in improving the long-term maintenance of PA in CRCS. Further studies with higher methodological quality are needed to confirm these findings. Implications for Cancer Survivors Aerobic exercise, pedometers, PA diaries and educational materials seem to be important aspects to achieve sustainable adherence to an active lifestyle over time. Supervision, access to fitness areas and applying some BCT appear to be differentiating features to obtain more successful PA maintenance.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive changes in both motor and non-motor symptoms. Boxing exercise can improve PD symptoms. This review aimed to determine the effects of boxing exercise on lower extremity strength, balance, mobility, gait, depression, quality of life, disease severity, exercise safety, and adherence in patients with PD. Design A systematic review. Setting and participants Articles were selected if they included participants diagnosed with PD and used boxing exercise as the main intervention. Methods Systematic review study based on PRISMA criteria. Searches were implemented in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until February 2024. We selected studies reporting on the pre-post assessment of a boxing intervention with lower extremity strength, balance, mobility, gait, depression, quality of life, disease severity, exercise safety, and adherence in patients with PD. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database and ROBINS-I 2.0 criteria evaluated the literature’s quality. Results Out of 4,301 records, 13 studies were included, involving 402 PD patients aged 53–89, with 72.4% being male. Interventions lasted 6–96 weeks, primarily in community settings and gymnasiums. Moderate-quality evidence suggested boxing exercises is feasible and effective for enhancing lower extremity strength, balance, mobility, gait, depression, quality of life, disease severity, exercise safety and adherence in PD patients. Conclusions and implications Boxing exercise can effectively improve both motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients, with safety and high adherence. This review systematically summarizes the emerging evidence on the application of boxing exercise in the rehabilitation of patients with PD. Future research should include more homogenous PD patient populations and conducting randomized controlled trials.
Article
Full-text available
Creatine monohydrate supplementation is used in numerous sports to enhance an athlete’s performance by improving lean muscle mass. Athletes and men and women, who participate in recreational sports, take creatine before, during, or after training whether they are in the weight room or on the field/court. Creatine can also improve muscle recovery from intense exercise. This systematic review aims to assess the effects of creatine supplementation on an athlete’s muscle mass growth. A literature search was conducted utilizing two databases which included PubMed and Sports Discus. The databases discovered randomized controlled trials published between 2014 to 2024, using combinations of the search terms: “athletes,” “sports,” “athletics,” AND “creatine,” AND “muscle mass,” “hypertrophy,” AND “sports performance.” Reference lists of appropriate studies were manually searched for additional articles. The thirty-three studies offer support for the usage of creatine to improve lean muscle mass and sports performance. The results of this systematic review indicated muscle mass in athletes can increase significantly by creatine supplementation.
Article
Full-text available
ÖZ: Bu çalışmanın amacı glutamin ve kreatin kombine tüketiminin bisikletçilerin performansına akut etkisinin incelenmesidir. Bu çalışmaya lisanslı, aktif ve antrenmanlı 8 erkek bisikletçi (yaş: 25,85 ± 9,75 yıl; boy uzunluğu: 174,71 ± 5,18 cm; vücut ağırlığı: 69,81 ± 7,16 kg; beden kütle indeksi (BKİ): 22,95 ± 2,97 kg/m2 ; sporcu yaşı: 5,28 ± 2,28) gönüllü olarak katıldı. Randomize, tek kör ve çapraz döngü çalışmada, bisikletçiler rastgele 2 gruba ayrıldı ve 48 saat ara ile glutamin&kreatin (SUP) veya plasebo (PLA) alarak fonksiyonel eşik güç (FTP) testini uyguladı. Testlerin ardından Borg Skalası, Görsel Analog Skala (GAS) ve Gastrointestinal Semptom Derecelendirme Ölçeği (GSDÖ) uygulandı. Gruplar arası karşılaştırma bağımlı örneklem t-test ile analiz edildi. Ayrıca etki büyüklüğünün hesaplanması için Cohen’s d formülü uygulandı. Testler sonucunda kalp atım hızı (KAH), kadans, FTP (ortalama güç, W, W/kg), algılanan zorluk derecesi (AZD) ve GAS değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark olmadığı tespit edildi (p>0,05). Ayrıca, SUP grubu lehine kadans değerlerinde düşük (0,34) ve GAS değerlerinde yüksek etki büyüklüğü (0,83) bulunurken, AZD değerlerinde PLA grubu lehine orta etki büyüklüğü (0,61) tespit edildi. GSDÖ bulgularında gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığı tespit edildi (p>0,05). Sonuç olarak, çalışmamızda glutamin&kreatin kombine tüketiminin fonksiyonel eşik güç (FTP) ve performans üzerine akut etkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, glutamin&kreatin tüketiminin kas ağrılarına olumlu etki ettiği söylenebilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ergojenik Destek, Fonksiyonel Eşik Güç, Glutamin, Kreatin, Sporcu Beslenmesi. ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effect of the combined consumption of glutamine and creatine on the performance of cyclists. Eight licensed, active, and trained male cyclists (age: 25.85 ± 9.75 years; height: 174.71 ± 5.18 cm; body weight: 69.81 ± 7.16 kg; body mass index (BMI): 22.95 ± 2.97 kg/m2; sports age: 5.28 ± 2.28 years) voluntarily participated in this study. In a randomized, single-blind, and cross-over design, the cyclists were randomly divided into 2 groups and performed the functional threshold power (FTP) test by taking glutamine&creatine (SUP) or placebo (PLA) at a 48-hour interval. The Borg Scale, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) were utilized at the end of the tests. Between-group comparisons were analyzed with paired sample t-tests. Cohen’s d formula was applied to calculate the effect size. No statistical significance was found in heart rate (HR), cadence, FTP (average power, W, W/kg), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and VAS values (p>0.05). Also, while there was a small effect size in cadence (0.34) and a large effect size in VAS (0.83) in favor of the SUP group, a medium effect size (0.61) was observed in RPE in favor of the PLA group. In GSRS results, no significant difference was observed between the groups (p>0.05). In conclusion, it was determined that glutamine&creatine coingestion had no acute effect on functional threshold power (FTP) and performance. However, it can be said that glutamine & creatine consumption has a positive effect on muscle pain. Keywords: Creatine, Ergogenic Aid, Functional Threshold Power, Glutamine, Sports Nutrition.
Article
Bu çalışmanın amacı glutamin ve kreatin kombine tüketiminin bisikletçilerin performansına akut etkisinin incelenmesidir. Bu çalışmaya lisanslı, aktif ve antrenmanlı 8 erkek bisikletçi (yaş: 25,85 ± 9,75 yıl; boy uzunluğu: 174,71 ± 5,18 cm; vücut ağırlığı: 69,81 ± 7,16 kg; beden kütle indeksi (BKİ): 22,95 ± 2,97 kg/m2; sporcu yaşı: 5,28 ± 2,28) gönüllü olarak katıldı. Randomize, tek kör ve çapraz döngü çalışmada, bisikletçiler rastgele 2 gruba ayrıldı ve 48 saat ara ile glutamin&kreatin (SUP) veya plasebo (PLA) alarak fonksiyonel eşik güç (FTP) testini uyguladı. Testlerin ardından Borg Skalası, Görsel Analog Skala (GAS) ve Gastrointestinal Semptom Derecelendirme Ölçeği (GSDÖ) uygulandı. Gruplar arası karşılaştırma bağımlı örneklem t-test ile analiz edildi. Ayrıca etki büyüklüğünün hesaplanması için Cohen’s d formülü uygulandı. Testler sonucunda kalp atım hızı (KAH), kadans, FTP (ortalama güç, W, W/kg), algılanan zorluk derecesi (AZD) ve GAS değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark olmadığı tespit edildi (p>0,05). Ayrıca, SUP grubu lehine kadans değerlerinde düşük (0,34) ve GAS değerlerinde yüksek etki büyüklüğü (0,83) bulunurken, AZD değerlerinde PLA grubu lehine orta etki büyüklüğü (0,61) tespit edildi. GSDÖ bulgularında gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığı tespit edildi (p>0,05). Sonuç olarak, çalışmamızda glutamin&kreatin kombine tüketiminin fonksiyonel eşik güç (FTP) ve performans üzerine akut etkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte, glutamin&kreatin tüketiminin kas ağrılarına olumlu etki ettiği söylenebilir.
Article
Full-text available
Throughout the sport-science and sports-medicine literature, the term “elite” subjects might be one of the most overused and ill-defined terms. Currently, there is no common perspective or terminology to characterize the caliber and training status of an individual or cohort. This paper presents a 6-tiered Participant Classification Framework whereby all individuals across a spectrum of exercise backgrounds and athletic abilities can be classified. The Participant Classification Framework uses training volume and performance metrics to classify a participant to one of the following: Tier 0: Sedentary; Tier 1: Recreationally Active; Tier 2: Trained/Developmental; Tier 3: Highly Trained/National Level; Tier 4: Elite/International Level; or Tier 5: World Class. We suggest the Participant Classification Framework can be used to classify participants both prospectively (as part of study participant recruitment) and retrospectively (during systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses). Discussion around how the Participant Classification Framework can be tailored toward different sports, athletes, and/or events has occurred, and sport-specific examples provided. Additional nuances such as depth of sport participation, nationality differences, and gender parity within a sport are all discussed. Finally, chronological age with reference to the junior and masters athlete, as well as the Paralympic athlete, and their inclusion within the Participant Classification Framework has also been considered. It is our intention that this framework be widely implemented to systematically classify participants in research featuring exercise, sport, performance, health, and/or fitness outcomes going forward, providing the much-needed uniformity to classification practices.
Article
Full-text available
Although creatine supplementation is well-known to increase exercise performance in acute high-intensity exercises, its role in aerobic performance based on VO2max is more controversial. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of creatine supplementation on VO2max. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and ScienceDirect were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting VO2max in creatine supplementation and placebo groups before and after supplementation. We computed a random-effects meta-analysis on VO2max at baseline, within groups following supplementation, on changes on VO2max between groups, and after supplementation between groups. Sensitivity analyses and meta-regression were conducted. We included 19 RCTs for a total of 424 individuals (mean age 30 years old, 82% men). VO2max did not differ at baseline between groups (creatine and placebo). Participants in both groups were engaged in exercise interventions in most studies (80%). Using changes in VO2max, VO2max increased in both groups but increased less after creatine supplementation than placebo (effect size [ES] = −0.32, 95%CI = −0.51 to −0.12, p = 0.002). Comparisons after creatine supplementation confirmed a lower VO2max in the creatine group compared to the placebo group (ES= −0.20, 95%CI = −0.39 to −0.001, p = 0.049). Meta-analysis after exclusion from meta-funnel resulted in similar outcomes in a subgroup of young and healthy participants. Meta-regressions on characteristics of supplementation, physical training, or sociodemographic were not statistically significant. Creatine supplementation has a negative effect on VO2max, regardless of the characteristics of training, supplementation, or population.
Article
Full-text available
Creatine monohydrate (CrM) and β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) are common ergogenic aids in the field of sports and are frequently used in an isolated way. However, there are a few studies that have investigated the effect of combining both supplements on different variables related to performance, with controversial results. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and the degree of potentiation of 10 weeks of CrM plus HMB supplementation on sports performance, which was measured by an incremental test to exhaustion in elite male traditional rowers. In this placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 10-week study, participants (n = 28) were randomized to a placebo group (PLG; n = 7), CrM group (0.04 g/kg/day of CrM; n = 7), HMB group (3 g/day of HMB; n = 7) and CrM-HMB group (0.04 g/kg/day of CrM plus 3 g/day of HMB; n = 7). Before and after 10 weeks of different treatments, an incremental test was performed on a rowing ergometer to calculate the power that each rower obtained at the anaerobic threshold (WAT), and at 4 mmol (W4) and 8 mmol (W8) of blood lactate concentration. There were no significant differences in WAT and W4 among groups or in body composition. However, it was observed that the aerobic power achieved at W8 was significantly higher in the CrM-HMB group than in the PLG, CrM and HMB groups (p < 0.001; η2p = 0.766). Likewise, a synergistic effect of combined supplementation was found for the sum of the two supplements separately at WAT (CrM-HMBG = 403.19% vs. CrMG+HMBG = 337.52%), W4 (CrM-HMBG = 2736.17% vs. CrMG+HMBG = 1705.32%) and W8 (CrM-HMBG = 1293.4% vs. CrMG+HMBG = 877.56%). In summary, CrM plus HMB supplementation over 10 weeks showed a synergistic effect on aerobic power (measured as WAT, W4, and W8) during an incremental test but had no influence muscle mass.
Article
Full-text available
Although there are many studies showing the isolated effect of creatine monohydrate (CrM) and β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB), it is not clear what effect they have when they are combined. The main purpose of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of mixing CrM plus HMB in comparison with their isolated effects on sports performance, body composition, exercise induced markers of muscle damage, and anabolic-catabolic hormones. This systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement guidelines and the PICOS model, for the definition of the inclusion criteria. Studies were found by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus electronic databases from inception to July 3rd 2019. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by two authors independently, and disagreements were resolved by third-party evaluation, in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines samples. The literature was examined regarding the effects of the combination of CrM plus HMB on sport performance using several outcome variables (athletic performance, body composition, markers of muscle damage, and hormone status). This systematic review included six articles that investigated the effects of CrM plus HMB on sport performance (two on strength performance, showing improvements in one of them; three on anaerobic performance, presenting enhancements in two of them; and one on aerobic performance, not presenting improvements), body composition (three on body mass, showing improvements in one of them; two on fat free mass, presenting increases in one of them; and two on fat mass, showing decreases in one of them) and markers of muscle damage and hormone status (four on markers of muscle damage and one on anabolic-catabolic hormones, not showing benefits in any of them). In summary, the combination of 3-10 g/day of CrM plus 3 g/day of HMB for 1-6 weeks could produce potential positive effects on sport performance (strength and anaerobic performance) and for 4 weeks on body composition (increasing fat free mass and decreasing fat mass). However, this combination seems to not show positive effects relating to markers of exercise-induced muscle damage and anabolic-catabolic hormones.
Article
Full-text available
Background Citrulline is an increasingly common dietary supplement that is thought to enhance exercise performance by increasing nitric oxide production. In the last 5 years, several studies have investigated the effects of citrulline supplements on strength and power outcomes, with mixed results reported. To date, the current authors are unaware of any attempts to systematically review this emerging body of literature. Objective The current study sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature describing the effects of citrulline supplementation on strength and power outcomes. Methods A comprehensive, systematic search of three prominent research databases was performed to find peer-reviewed, English language, original research studies evaluating the effects of citrulline supplementation on indices of high-intensity exercise performance in healthy men and women. Outcomes included strength and power variables from performance tests involving multiple repetitive muscle actions of large muscle groups, consisting of either resistance training sets or sprints lasting 30 s or less. Tests involving isolated actions of small muscle groups or isolated attempts of single-jump tasks were not included for analysis due to differences in metabolic requirements. Studies were excluded from consideration if they lacked a placebo condition for comparison, were carried out in clinical populations, provided a citrulline dose of less than 3 g, provided the citrulline dose less than 30 min prior to exercise testing, or combined the citrulline ingredient with creatine, caffeine, nitrate, or other ergogenic ingredients. Results Twelve studies, consisting of 13 total independent samples (n = 198 participants), met the inclusion criteria. Between-study variance, heterogeneity, and inconsistency across studies were low (Cochrane’s Q = 6.9, p = 0.86; τ² = 0.0 [0.0, 0.08], I² = 0.0 [0.0, 40.0]), and no funnel plot asymmetry was present. Results of the meta-analysis identified a significant benefit for citrulline compared to placebo treatments (p = 0.036), with a small pooled standardized mean difference (SMD; Hedges’ G) of 0.20 (95% confidence interval 0.01–0.39). Conclusion The effect size was small (0.20), and confidence intervals for each individual study crossed the line of null effect. However, the results may be relevant to high-level athletes, in which competitive outcomes are decided by small margins. Further research is encouraged to fully elucidate the effects of potential moderating study characteristics, such as the form of citrulline supplement, citrulline dose, sex, age, and strength versus power tasks.
Article
Background: Creatine supplementation (Cr) increases strength during resistance training, but the time course of this strength increase is unclear. The aim was to determine the precise time course by which Cr could increase strength and whether Cr prevents muscle damage during eight weeks of resistance training. Methods: Young males were randomized (double blind) to Cr (n=9, 0.07g/kg/d) and placebo (n=9) during 8-weeks of resistance training (3d/week). Strength was assessed across six exercises every two weeks. Venous blood samples obtained at baseline, and 24 and 48 hours after the final resistance training session were assessed for creatine kinase [CK] and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] as measures of muscle damage. Results: Strength was significantly higher in the Cr versus placebo group (p<0.05) after two weeks of training for three of the six exercises (bench press, leg press, shoulder press). By the end of the eight weeks of training, strength was significantly higher in the Cr versus placebo group (p<0.05) for four of the six exercises (bench press, leg press, shoulder press, and triceps extension, but not biceps curl or lat-pulldown). Creatine supplementation did not prevent muscle damage. Indeed, muscle damage markers increased in the Cr compared to placebo group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Cr increased muscular strength in as little as two weeks during a resistance training program; however, this was not accompanied by decreased muscle damage. Greater muscle damage with Cr may be due to a greater training intensity enabled by Cr supplementation. This might lead to greater protein turnover and enhanced muscle adaptation.