ArticlePDF Available

CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKET TRANSFORMATION DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19

Authors:
  • Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Abstract and Figures

The pandemic and subsequent changes in various spheres of human activity have also transformed consumer behavior, particularly in the cryptocurrency market. The article is aimed at identifying the priority directions of transformations taking place in the cryp-tocurrency market in the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic under the influence of certain groups of factors. System and network approaches to understanding the cryp-tocurrency market have been identified. The cryptocurrency market is considered from a functional and institutional point of view. From a functional point of view, the crypto-currency market is a set of economic relations in cyberspace regarding cryptocurrency mining, initial coin offering (ICO) and circulation of cryptocurrencies based on the laws of supply and demand. From an institutional point of view, the cryptocurrency market is a set of participants in virtual currency schemes who carry out cryptocurrency transactions. The following signs of cryptocurrency market segmentation are justified such as those depending on the market capitalization of the cryptocurrency; on the nature of the crypto asset's movement; on operations carried out on the market; on the region; on consumers of services. Factors that influence the functioning of the cryptocurrency market are systematized according to the following groups: macroeconomic, price, environmental , geographic, market, behavioral and technological. The influence of gold, oil prices, the daily number of Covid-19 cases and deaths from Covid-19, the MSCI ACWI global stock index, the iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF, the Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index on the Bitcoin exchange rate is revealed. The trends in the crypto-currency market development in the postwar period are justified, namely the growth of investors' interest in cryptocurrencies against the background of the initial coin offering collapse; growth of payments in cryptocurrencies; strengthening the regulatory landscape on a global and national scale; integration of the cryptocurrency market with traditional finance; attracting non-typical participants to the cryptocurrency business; expansion of participants in the infrastructure of the cryptocurrency market due to the rapid cryptocurrency market development, in particular, due to the production of equipment for its operation.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ФІНАНСОВО-КРЕДИТНА ДІЯЛЬНІСТЬ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТЕОРІЇ ТА ПРАКТИКИ
Том 1 (48), 2023
114
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKET TRANSFORMATION
DURING THE PANDEMIC COVID-19
ABSTRACT
The pandemic and subsequent changes in various spheres of human activity have also
transformed consumer behavior, particularly in the cryptocurrency market. The article
is aimed at identifying the priority directions of transformations taking place in the cryp-
tocurrency market in the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic under the influence of
certain groups of factors. System and network approaches to understanding the cryp-
tocurrency market have been identified. The cryptocurrency market is considered from
a functional and institutional point of view. From a functional point of view, the crypto-
currency market is a set of economic relations in cyberspace regarding cryptocurrency
mining, initial coin offering (ICO) and circulation of cryptocurrencies based on the laws
of supply and demand. From an institutional point of view, the cryptocurrency market
is a set of participants in virtual currency schemes who carry out cryptocurrency trans-
actions. The following signs of cryptocurrency market segmentation are justified such
as those depending on the market capitalization of the cryptocurrency; on the nature
of the crypto asset's movement; on operations carried out on the market; on the region;
on consumers of services. Factors that influence the functioning of the cryptocurrency
market are systematized according to the following groups: macroeconomic, price, en-
vironmental, geographic, market, behavioral and technological. The influence of gold,
oil prices, the daily number of Covid-19 cases and deaths from Covid-19, the MSCI ACWI
global stock index, the iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF, the Wilshire 5000
Total Market Index on the Bitcoin exchange rate is revealed. The trends in the crypto-
currency market development in the post-war period are justified, namely the growth
of investors' interest in cryptocurrencies against the background of the initial coin offer-
ing collapse; growth of payments in cryptocurrencies; strengthening the regulatory
landscape on a global and national scale; integration of the cryptocurrency market with
traditional finance; attracting non-typical participants to the cryptocurrency business;
expansion of participants in the infrastructure of the cryptocurrency market due to the
rapid cryptocurrency market development, in particular, due to the production of equip-
ment for its operation.
Keywords: cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, mining, crypto assets, cryptocurrency business
JEL Classification: E49, E51, P44, O31
INTRODUCTION
The Covid-19 pandemic, declared by the World Health Organization, created challenges
not only for the health sector, but also affected sales, production, logistics, and unem-
ployment. The pandemic and subsequent changes in various spheres of human activity
have also transformed consumer behavior, particularly in financial markets. The uncer-
tainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic is contributing to the increased volatility and
unpredictability of financial markets. Due to the increased access to high-speed Inter-
net, the consumers’ propensity for digital financial services and currencies is growing.
This gives a powerful impetus to the development of the crypto economy, a component
of which is the cryptocurrency market. The pandemic accelerated the digitalization of
financial transactions (Mazaraki et al., 2021; Volosovych et al., 2021) and reduced cash
circulation. And although the pandemic is currently causing certain problems in the
functioning of financial systems, it is likely that in the long term, it may have a positive
effect. Both consumers and providers of financial services are beginning to realize the
potential of using FinTech tools. At the same time, cryptocurrency is gaining more and
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
Svitlana Volosovych
D.Sc. in Economics, Professor of the
Department of Finance,
State University of Trade and
Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine;
ORCID: 0000-0003-3143-7582
Antonina Sholoiko
D.Sc. in Economics, Associate
Professor of the
Department of Insurance, Banking and
Risk-management,
Taras Shevchenko National University
of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine;
e-mail: sholoiko@ukr.net
ORCID: 0000-0003-1239-4281
(Corresponding author)
Liudmyla Shevchenko
Candidate of Philological Sciences,
Associate Professor of the
Department of Foreign Languages,
Taras Shevchenko National University
of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine;
ORCID: 0000-0002-4543-3876
Received: 20/12/2022
Accepted: 12/01/2023
Published: 28/02/2023
© Copyright
2022 by the author(s)
This is an Open Access article
distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
115
more popularity in financial transactions. Cryptocurrency, the impetus for which was created by the financial crisis of 2008,
received an increase in interest from consumers of payment services during the pandemic crisis. Changes in traditional
financial markets push investors to diversify their portfolios at the expense of cryptocurrency. In particular, the fall in the
rates of traditional financial assets in the context of the pandemic contributes to the growth of interest in cryptocurrencies
among institutional and individual investors due to the need for a reliable asset so as to preserve value and the ability to
make payments. The sharp increase in demand for financial services with cryptocurrency creates the basis for various
transformations in all segments of the cryptocurrency market.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The growing popularity of cryptocurrencies is causing the expansion of the virtual money market (Volosovych & Baraniuk
(2018). The significant volatility of cryptocurrencies during the pandemic increases the public’s interest in carrying out
transactions in the cryptocurrency market with the aim of receiving income, despite possible financial losses. Nowadays,
the term “cryptocurrency market” appears in many publications. However, its application is often limited to its use in the
title of articles without analyzing its essence (Ji et al., 2019; Lahmiria & Bekiros, 2020; Noda, 2020).
In scientific literature and regulatory acts, more attention is focused on the content of cryptocurrency. Regarding the
essence of the cryptocurrency market, few researchers have paid attention to this issue. In our opinion, system and
network approaches to defining the cryptocurrency market can be distinguished. Within the first approach, Mnif E., Jarboui
A., Mouakharc K. (Mnif et al., 2020) understand cryptocurrency markets as complex systems based on speculation, within
which investors interact on the basis of certain strategies, and it generates certain biases, conditioning endogenous insta-
bility. But here the emphasis is on the secondary cryptocurrency market, without mentioning the primary one. At the same
time, attention is focused only on investment activities in the cryptocurrency market. Kuznyetsova A., Sydorchenko, T.,
Zadvorna, O., Nikonenko, U., Khalina, O. (2021) analyze the use of bitcoin and ethereum cryptocurrencies in the field of
e-commerce in Ukraine. T. Zhelyuk and O. Brechko (2016) somewhat expand the system approach, regarding the crypto-
currency market as a system that combines into one whole all the elements that ensure the release (emission) of crypto-
currencies and their circulation according to the laws of supply and demand among the participants of this market. Here
it should be taken into account that cryptocurrencies appear on the primary market due to their mining or initial placement
of coins (Initial coin offering, ICO). Understanding the cryptocurrency market within the system approach makes it possible
to state that it is a component of the financial market, of course, with a specific object, participants and relationships
among them. David Vidal-Tomás (2021) equates the cryptocurrency market with the cryptocurrency network. Taking into
consideration that cryptocurrency and transactions with it are possible only in cyberspace, this approach follows a certain
logic, despite the fact that the market and the network differ somewhat in their structural elements (Podnos, 2016) and
functions.
Based on the above, the cryptocurrency market can be considered from a functional and institutional point of view. From
a functional point of view, the cryptocurrency market is a set of economic relations in cyberspace regarding cryptocurrency
mining, initial coin offering (ICO) and circulation of cryptocurrencies based on the laws of supply and demand. From an
institutional point of view, the cryptocurrency market is a set of participants in virtual currency schemes who carry out
cryptocurrency transactions. In February 2015, the European Central Bank defined a virtual currency as a digital represen-
tation of value not issued by a central bank, credit organization, or electronic money institution, which can in some cases
be used as an alternative to money ECB (2015). To characterize the mechanism of transactions with virtual currencies,
the European Central Bank used the term "virtual currency scheme(s)", which has two aspects. On the one hand, it shows
the value, on the other hand, it demonstrates integral or built-in mechanisms that ensure the transfer of this value ECB
(2015).
The COVID-19 pandemic affected all areas of human life, in particular, the cryptocurrency market, where according to the
research conducted in 2020-2021, it caused:
increasing volatility. Thus, Lahmiria S. & Bekiros S. (2020) found that the pandemic has a stronger impact on the
cryptocurrency market in this context than on international stock markets, in particular, the stock market;
the growth of its effectiveness, which is proved by the results of research by Mnif E., Jarboui A., Mouakharc K. (2020).
At the same time, Noda A. (2020) notes that the level of efficiency of the Bitcoin market is higher than the level of
efficiency of Ethereum and that cryptocurrency markets with greater liquidity have achieved greater development.
At the same time, Mnif E, Jarboui A., Mouakharc K. (2020) state that Bitcoin was the most effective before the
pandemic; and after the outbreak of COVID-19, Ethereum turned out to be more effective due to the fact, that the
spread of the pandemic increases the effectiveness of all cryptocurrencies;
ФІНАНСОВО-КРЕДИТНА ДІЯЛЬНІСТЬ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТЕОРІЇ ТА ПРАКТИКИ
Том 1 (48), 2023
116
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
there is a convergence between cryptocurrencies with clear technological functions and classifications against the
background of changes in the market microstructure behavior and the introduction of Bitcoin futures contracts by
the Chicago Exchange N., Koutmos D., Payne J. (2021).
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
The article is aimed at identifying the priority directions of transformations taking place in the cryptocurrency market in
the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic under the influence of certain groups of factors.
Objectives include revealing the influence of gold, oil prices, the daily number of Covid-19 cases and deaths from Covid-
19, the MSCI ACWI global stock index, the iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF, the Wilshire 5000 Total Market
Index on the Bitcoin exchange rate.
METHODS
To establish the relationship between the daily rate of Bitcoin (Finance, 2021) and the prices of gold (dollar per troy ounce)
(Gold, 2021), oil (dollar per barrel) (Eia, 2021), the number of cases of Covid-19 and deaths from Covid-19 (Pkgstore,
2021), MSCI ACWI (Sg, 2021), iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF (Finance, 2021a), iShares Core MSCI Europe
ETF (IEUR) (Finance, 2021b), Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index (Finance, 2021c), iShares MSCI China ETF (Finance,
2021d) the Granger test was used. The research period was from January 1, 2020, to September 7, 2021, the time when
the pandemic began and reached its peak. The choice of this period was due to the beginning of the pandemic and its
greatest spread, which allows to identify or refute cause-and-effect relationships. The Granger test gives the possibility to
define the null hypothesis "X is not the cause of Y". The criterion for accepting the hypothesis is the P-value (if P is less
than 0.05, then the null hypothesis is rejected). A reverse check is simultaneously carried out. Granger tests were per-
formed for 15 lags. The Granger causality calculation was carried out in the Spyder software environment.
RESULTS
The development of the cryptocurrency market in the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic varies according to its seg-
ments. The segmentation of the cryptocurrency market is not clearly traced in the scientific literature. The Research and
Market study carried out in 2020 was based on the segmentation of the cryptocurrency market according to the following
criteria: geography, design goals, and market capitalization (GlobeNewswire, 2020). In 2021, the market is segmented on
the basis of applications, products and components, technologies, geography Research and Markets (2021). Markets and
Markets (2021) offers to analyze the cryptocurrency market according to end-user industries; programs used; cryptocur-
rency type; cryptocurrency profitability and geographic location of markets.
Table 1 represents the systematization of the mentioned approaches with the authors’ clarifications and additions to the
existing criteria for the cryptocurrency market segmentation and its types.
Table 1. Segmentation of the cryptocurrency market.
(Source: compiled on the basis of [33, 43])
Segmentation criteria
Market segment
Depending on the market capitalization of the cryptocurrency
Bitcoin market (BTC)
Ethereum market (ETH)
Binance Coin market (BNB)
Dogecoin market (DOGE)
XRP market
Tether Market (USDT)
Cardano Market (ADA)
Market of other cryptocurrencies
Depending on the nature of the crypto asset’s movement
Primary market of cryptocurrencies
Secondary market of cryptocurrencies
Mining
ІСО
Exchange cryptocurrency market
OTC cryptocurrency market
Depending on the operations carried out on the market
Mining
Payments
Trade
Investments
Transfer
Depending on the region
Global cryptocurrency market
Regional cryptocurrency market
Depending on the consumers of services
The segment of clients-individuals
Segment of corporate clients
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
117
As can be seen from Figure 1, during July 2016 to June 2021, the global cryptocurrency market grew. This trend is
especially clear during the Covid-19 pandemic. Thus, if on July 24, 2019, this indicator was USD 235.5 billion, then on July
29, 2020, it showed USD 274.4 billion and on June 20, 2021, there was an increase up to USD 1.3 trillion (bln) (Coinmar-
ketcap, 2021). At the same time, it is expected that due to the application of blockchain technology and the growth of
venture capital investments, the global cryptocurrency market will grow to USD 2.2 trillion (bln) dollars USA in 2026
(Research and markets, 2021). Figure 1 shows that during 2016-2022 the Bitcoin market was the leader in capitalization.
The second position is confidently occupied by Ethereum. Other cryptocurrencies from the TOP-5 in 2022, compared to
2021, slightly changed their positions.
Figure 1. The market capitalization of the global cryptocurrency market and top 5 cryptocurrencies during 2016-2022.
(Source: built on
the basis of [11])
The development of the cryptocurrency market is influenced by a system of various factors. Ji Q., Bourid E., Roubaude D.,
Kristoufek L. (2019). emphasize the interdependence of the energy, commodity, and cryptocurrency markets. In our opin-
ion, the factors influencing the cryptocurrency market functioning can be divided into the following groups:
macroeconomic;
price;
ecological;
geographical;
market;
behavioral;
technological.
Figure 2 shows the specifics of the cryptocurrency market functioning in pandemic conditions. Thus, there is a significant
transformation of the macroeconomic environment, reinforced by social distancing and quarantine restrictions, which led
to a drop-in world and domestic gross products, production, household incomes, and an increase in inflation. Undoubtedly,
this has a powerful impact on all areas of human life as a whole and on the formation of the cryptocurrency market
landscape.
The price factors influencing the cryptocurrency market include:
the price of gold;
exchange rate of certain national currencies, in particular, the USD;
electricity price;
prices for cryptocurrency mining equipment.
Zhu Y., Dickinson D., Li. J. (2017) found that the most significant influence on the Bitcoin rate in the pre-pandemic period
was the price of gold and the rate of the USD due to the fact that they have the same trend in the short term and different
trends in the long term. The findings of their research showed that the prices of gold and Bitcoin decreased because of
12099 80434
245873 235521 274409
1245214
971311
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
July 20, 2016 July 26, 2017 July25, 2018 July 24, 2019 July 29, 2020 July 20, 2021 June 24, 2022
Bitcoin Ethereum Tether XRP Litecoin overall cryptocurrency market cap
ФІНАНСОВО-КРЕДИТНА ДІЯЛЬНІСТЬ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТЕОРІЇ ТА ПРАКТИКИ
Том 1 (48), 2023
118
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
the growth of the US economy and the strengthening of the USD, which causes a decrease in the public interest to invest
in gold (Zhu et al., 2017). Electricity and equipment prices are related to cryptocurrency mining costs. The process of
producing cryptocurrency coins got its name by analogy with the mining of gold or other minerals. Thus, miners are
compared to prospectors when selecting the right combination of numbers for the crypto coin formation. Miners are not
cryptocurrency issuers in the legal sense of the word, as they have not been authorized by anyone to create the currency.
The energy consumption of this type of activity tends to increase. Thus, in 2018, according to some estimates, about 67
terawatt-hours per year were consumed during Bitcoin mining, as it was approximately done by the population of the
Czech Republic with more than 10 million people (Malanov & Lurie, 2019). Already in 2019, this indicator amounted to 73
terawatt-hours, which can be compared with the electricity consumption by the population of Austria with a larger popu-
lation (Kuzyuk, 2019). Mining requires powerful computers that consume a lot of electricity. As a result, the cost of elec-
tricity in the country is an important factor affecting the profitability of this activity. The most profitable is mining in
Venezuela, where mining 1 bitcoin costs USD 531 Zakon (2018), which is explained by the fact that the state subsidizes
electricity generation.
Cryptocurrency market
Primary
Pandemic
market
Cryptocurrency exchanges
ІСО
Mining
Covid-19
OTC cryptocurrency
Secondary
Price factors Market
factors Macroeconomic
factors
Environmental
factors
Development trends of
the cryptocurrency
market:
- growing investors
interest
- ICO compression
- growth of payments in
cryptocurrencies
- strengthening of the
regulatory landscape
- integration of the
cryptocurrency market
with traditional finance
- expansion of the circle
of cryptocurrency
market participants
Peculiarities of the
cryptocurrency market
during the pandemic:
- increasing volatility
- increasing efficiency
- convergence of
cryptocurrencies
Geographical
factors Behavioral
factors Technological
factors
Figure 2. The specifics of the cryptocurrency market functioning in the conditions of the pandemic.
Geographical risks relate to the concentration of mining and equipment manufacturing in China. The largest manufacturers
of Bitmain, Canaan Creative and Ebang cryptocurrency mining equipment are located in this country. This may lead to a
crisis in this component of the cryptocurrency market.
Although the concept of the cryptocurrency virtual nature dominates today, its destructive impact on the environment is
observed due to the consumption of significant amounts of electricity during mining. Even though the physical damage at
the site of the mining farms is minimal, the indirect environmental damage due to the consumption of electricity is not
controllable in contrast to economic entities involved in the extraction of minerals or a certain type of production. A 2020
study by researchers at Dublin City University, Trinity College Dublin, and the University of Southampton found that cryp-
tocurrency mining is a factor affecting prices in the electricity and utility markets (Laurent, 2021).
According to some estimates, thermal power plants that produce energy for mining emit about 35 tons of СО2 into the
atmosphere annually, or about 308 tons per Bitcoin transaction (Kuzyuk, 2019). Only 28% of the energy consumed in
global cryptocurrency mining is produced from renewable sources (Kuzyuk, 2019). The largest contribution to environ-
mental pollution is made by Chinese miners, whose share in carbon dioxide emissions is 47%. Although China’s role in
СО2 emissions into the atmosphere should decrease, given that in 2007 the share of thermal power plants operating on
coal was 80%, and by 2040 they are planned to be reduced to 40%, as currently in Germany (Kuzyuk, 2019). Additionally,
according to some estimates, Bitcoin mining could increase the Earth’s temperature by 2° by 2033 (Hightech, 2018). The
negative impact of cryptocurrency mining on the environment is uneven. In countries with a significant share of coal-fired
power plants, pollution levels are higher, particularly in China. In Iceland and Norway, where nearly 100% of all energy
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
119
production is renewable, cryptocurrency miners take advantage of cheap hydroelectric and geothermal energy to power
their machines. Low temperatures in Nordic countries cause cost reductions as a result of the natural cooling of computer
servers. In 2020, according to a Cambridge University study, about 39% of the electricity used in Bitcoin mining is gener-
ated from renewable sources (Hazlewood, 2018). It should also be noted that specialized equipment is used for mining,
in particular, reserve blocks that require annual renewal. As a result, about 11,500 tons of hazardous e-waste are generated
annually (Howson, 2021).
Among the market factors which influence the functioning of the cryptocurrency market, such factors as the stock market,
the supply of cryptocurrencies, and the effectiveness of operations carried out on the market should be highlighted.
Volatility in financial markets causes the transformation of investments from shares to safer savings, in particular, cash
and gold. Although Bianchi D., Guidolin M. & Pedio M. (2020), Kuznyetsova A., Sydorchenko, T., Zadvorna, O., Nikonenko,
U., Khalina, O. (2021) insist on the absence of a systematic influence of such factors as the stock market and the gold
market, in the conditions of the pandemic, a certain connection is still observed. The results of research by Arias-Oliva M.,
Pelegrín-Borondo J., Matías-Clavero G. (2019) show a significant influence on the decision to invest in cryptocurrency due
to the expected effectiveness of this operation.
A powerful factor influencing the state of the cryptocurrency market is the supply of cryptocurrencies, in particular, Bitcoin.
Halving the reward for adding a new block when mining bitcoins, which is determined by the halving procedure embedded
in the network protocol, slows down the process of creating new blocks. On May 11, 2020, the third bitcoin halving took
place, which reduced the mining reward from 12.5 bitcoins per block to 6.25 bitcoins. After 21 million Bitcoins are created
(estimated in 2140), their mining will be stopped. In the context of the pandemic, due to the increasing efficiency of
cryptocurrency markets compared to the gold market, and the limited supply of Bitcoin, cryptocurrency becomes a powerful
investment tool capable of protecting against the volatility of the stock market and becomes a digital form of value preser-
vation (Harper, 2020).
Yang H. (2019) investigated behavioral anomalies in cryptocurrency markets, noting that due to the lack of regulation in
the cryptocurrency market, operations of a speculative nature, which can be characterized as asset pricing anomalies from
the standpoint of the behavioral theory, are carried out. Matselyukh N. (2016, p.53) defines price anomalies as persistent
deviations of the prices of financial instruments from the predicted ones, the size of which allows for generating excess
profits. Based on the classification of price anomalies proposed by Raghubir P. & Das S. (1970), it can be assumed that
their impact on the cryptocurrency market is enhanced by the fact that it is characterized by volatility and significant
profitability in pandemic conditions.
Technological factors affecting the cryptocurrency market should include technology changes; conditions that facilitate
operations on the financial market, and technical capabilities of national energy systems.
Unlike physical goods, changes in technology affect the prices of cryptocurrencies. In July-August 2017, the price of Bitcoin
was negatively affected by controversy about changing the basic technology to improve transaction times. After the
changes were completed, the price of Bitcoin rose from USD 2,700 up to USD 4000 in just two weeks. Conversely, reports
on hacking often lead to lower prices (Mazer, 2021). The results of the research conducted by Arias-Oliva M., Pelegrín-
Borondo J., Matías-Clavero G. (2019) testify to the significant influence of conditions that facilitate the implementation of
transactions in the financial market on the decision-making process regarding transactions with cryptocurrency. The tech-
nical capabilities of national power systems to support mining will not be able to provide the miners’ need for electricity
under certain conditions. The growth of cryptocurrency mining may, according to various estimates, lead to an energy
crisis. Thus, in June 2019, Iran blocked cryptocurrency mining due to problems in the energy market.
The application of the Granger test made it possible to establish that the course of Bitcoin in the conditions of the Covid-
19 pandemic during January 2020-September 2021 largely depends on the prices of gold, oil, the daily number of patients
with Covid-19 and deaths from Covid-19, the index world shares MSCI ACWI, iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF,
Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index. At the same time, the Bitcoin exchange rate influenced the price of gold (Table 2).
ФІНАНСОВО-КРЕДИТНА ДІЯЛЬНІСТЬ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТЕОРІЇ ТА ПРАКТИКИ
Том 1 (48), 2023
120
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
Table 2. Results of the pairwise Granger test for all variables for 1.01.2020-7.09.2021 (rows are Y-variables, and columns are X-varia-
bles).
(Source: calculated on the basis of [14; 15; 16; 17; 18])
Rate
BTC/USD
gold
price,
$/o.z.
crude
oil WTI,
$/br.
daily
worldwide
new covid
cases
daily
worldwide
new covid
deaths
MSCI
ACWI
iShares
MSCI All
Country
Asia ex
Japan
ETF
iShares
Core
MSCI
Europe
ETF
Wilshire
5000 To-
tal Mar-
ket In-
dex (US
stock
market)
iShares
MSCI
China
ETF
(MCHI)
Course
BTC/USD
1
0.523
0.6381
0.2101
0.0653
0.103
0.0278
0.0938
0.1
0.0276
Gold price,
USD/o.z.
0.7382
1
0.2894
0.2746
0.1144
0.013
0.121
0.0005
0.0322
0.1462
Crude oil WTI,
USD/br.
0.0002
0.0049
1
0.0263
0.0005
0
0
0
0
0.0078
Daily world-
wide new
covid cases
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Daily world-
wide new
covid deaths
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
MSCI ACWI
0.1308
0.0122
0.0047
0.0979
0.0275
1
0.022
0
0.028
0.3996
iShares MSCI
All Country
Asia ex Japan
ETF
0.463
0.026
0.0244
0.0131
0.0012
0
1
0.0005
0
0.0551
iShares Core
MSCI Europe
ETF
0.0174
0.0571
0.0895
0.0342
0.01
0
0.1414
1
0.0001
0.3245
Wilshire 5000
Total Market
Index
0.2361
0.0052
0.0071
0.1204
0.026
0.1034
0.0805
0.0011
1
0.482
iShares MSCI
China ETF
(MCHI)
0.0916
0.008
0.2043
0.025
0.0059
0.0008
0.0063
0.0025
0.0003
1
Of course, the specifics of the cryptocurrency market development during the pandemic will to some extent shape its post-
covid landscape with the continuation of certain trends. Among the development trends of the cryptocurrency market, in
our opinion, it is worth highlighting:
growing investors’ interest in cryptocurrencies due to the ICO collapse;
growth of payments in cryptocurrencies;
strengthening of the regulatory landscape on a global and national scale;
integration of the cryptocurrency market with traditional finance;
expansion of participants and infrastructure of the cryptocurrency market, due to the rapid cryptocurrency market
development, in particular, the production of equipment for its operation.
DISCUSSION
Despite the instability and high level of risk of cryptocurrency transactions, investors continue to invest in crypto assets
during the pandemic. Research in behavioral finance suggests that people tend to convert all liquid assets into cash to be
prepared for a future crisis (Muhn, 2020). After reaching a market value of USD 1 trillion, Bitcoin has gained popularity
among the largest Wall Street banks and Fortune 500 companies (Browne, 2021). In May 2021 the oldest American bank
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. declared its readiness to carry out transactions with cryptocurrencies in the interests of its
clients (Mind, 2021). Due to the weak correlation of cryptocurrency with traditional and alternative asset classes in the
conditions of the pandemic, it becomes an ideal diversifier of the investment portfolio. A study conducted by the Frankfurt
School of Finance and Management and the German company Iconic Holding, which carries out cryptocurrency operations,
proves that having 1-5% of cryptocurrency in an investment portfolio will not only bring additional profits but also signifi-
cantly increase the Sharpe ratio and profitability (Muhn, 2020).
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
121
The growing interest of investors, in particular, institutional investors, in cryptocurrencies in the context of the pandemic
influenced their rate increase. According to forecasts of JPMorgan, against the background of bitcoin’s competition with
gold as a potential protection of investments against inflation in the conditions of the pandemic, the bitcoin rate may rise
to USD 146,000 (Browne, 2021). The information about Tesla’s USD 1.5 billion investment in Bitcoin (Biers, 2021) raised
its rate to a record. At the same time, with the sale of 10% of bitcoins in the amount of USD 272 million at the end of
March 2021, Tesla earned a profit of USD 101 million, which affected the growth of the company’s quarterly profit by 27
times, which in turn determined the growth of its exchange rate (Prime, 2021). In early June 2021, the value of Bitcoin
decreased by 3% after a short message by Elon Musk on Twitter, containing the word Bitcoin, its image and a broken
heart (Ixbt, 2021), which once again confirms the influence of behavioral factors on the cryptocurrency market. There are
suggestions that the enthusiasm of cryptocurrency investors may have some social impact. Thus, 94% of German investors
who have invested 50-75% of their net assets in Bitcoin report a deterioration in personal relationships due to their
investment (Lulay, 2021).
In the post-COVID period, the trend of interest in cryptocurrency payments should continue. Although approximately 60%
of Bitcoin is owned by individuals or companies that have never sold more than 25% of their Bitcoin, and only 19% of
Bitcoin is used for trading (Bambrough, 2020), cryptocurrency payment services have begun to expand significantly during
the pandemic. Thus, PayPal stated that it allowed its users to make payments in Bitcoin as well as other cryptocurrencies
such as Ethereum and Litecoin (Sotinel, 2020). At the same time, Tesla announced its readiness to accept cryptocurrency
from buyers of its electric cars (Biers, 2021). In May 2021, American collection car auction company Mecum Auction began
accepting payments in Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Dogecoin and stablecoins USD Coin (USDC), Dai (DAI), Gemini
Dollar (GUSD), Paxos Standard (PAX) and Binance USD (BUSD) via BitPay (Thepaypers, 2021a). In July 2021, Hong Kong-
based The Pavilions Hotels and Resorts, which partners with global cryptocurrency payment gateway Coindirect, enabled
its customers to pay for hotel reservations using Bitcoin, Ethereum and 40 other virtual currencies 24/7 (The Paypers,
2021b).
The Consumer Adoption Report 2021 “Cryptocurrencies in Retail” compiled by CryptoRefills Labs Big Dream Ventures BV
states that 63% of cryptocurrency buyers use it to make payments (of which 35% do so weekly and 40% monthly), while
72.4% of users believe in the further spread of crypto payments in the future (Cabuk & Silenzi, 2021).
The Covid-19 pandemic will accelerate the integration of the cryptocurrency market with traditional finance. In June 2021,
the Spanish bank Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (SABBVA.MC) said it was starting to provide Bitcoin trading and storage
services to private banking clients in Switzerland, where it operates through a franchise. SABBVA.MC limits these services
exclusively to Switzerland, motivating it by the appropriate level of regulation of cryptocurrency transactions in this country
due to the significant demand for such services. From July 2021, the American pension fund ForUsAll, which manages
assets in the amount of more than USD 1.7 billion for more than 70,000 employees of small and medium-sized businesses,
in cooperation with the cryptocurrency platform Coinbase, created the opportunity to invest up to 5% of employee retire-
ment funds in Bitcoin and Ethereum within the Alt 401 (k) pension plan. The fee will be 0.5% for transactions and crypto
assets management (Khatri, 2021).
The expansion of payments in cryptocurrency, increased investors’ interest and the inclusion of cryptocurrency operations
by banks in their services to some extent have caused the transformation of the global and national regulatory landscape.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision noted that the growth of cryptocurrency risks, despite their limitations for
banks, may result in increased risks of fraud, cyber-attacks, money laundering and terrorist financing. To prevent global
financial instability, in June 2021 it proposed a two-pronged approach to capital requirements for crypto assets held by
banks, which caused Bitcoin to rise by 1.5% (Jones & Wilson, 2021).
El Salvador has become the first country in the world to accept Bitcoin as a legal means of payment amid warnings from
many central banks about the risks of cryptocurrency transactions (Bbc, 2021). Meanwhile, in May 2021 the National
Internet Finance Association of China, the China Banking Association and the China Payment Clearing Association in a joint
statement banned financial institutions and payment companies from providing services related to cryptocurrency trans-
actions and warned investors against speculative cryptocurrency trading (Aljazeera, 2021). Argentina’s tax authority has
ordered cryptocurrency exchanges to submit data on their customers’ transactions in monthly reports. Exchanges must
identify the owners of cryptocurrency accounts and report on open accounts and the movement of funds to them on a
monthly basis (The Paypers, 2021c). Due to the strengthening of global and national regulation of the cryptocurrency
market, its participants are adapting their strategies of behavior on the market. Their associations are being created to
protect the interests of crypto investors, and former employees of financial regulators are being hired. Thus, the crypto-
currency exchange Coinbase, together with the investment companies Fidelity Investments, Paradigm and the financial
ФІНАНСОВО-КРЕДИТНА ДІЯЛЬНІСТЬ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТЕОРІЇ ТА ПРАКТИКИ
Том 1 (48), 2023
122
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
provider Square, created the “Crypto Council for Innovation” association. The policy of lobbying the interests of cryptocur-
rency exchanges is now actively pursued by cryptocurrency market players in India (Asokan, 2021).
The rapid development of the cryptocurrency market also led to the expansion of its infrastructure, in particular, the
production of equipment for its operation. According to some data, the global market for cryptocurrency mining equipment
will grow by USD 2.8 billion by 2024 (Rahul, 2021).
The pandemic contributed to the attraction of non-typical participants to the cryptocurrency business. Thus, in particular,
in Vietnam, Internet cafe owners, due to the suspension of their activities as a result of quarantine restrictions, began to
use computer equipment for mining cryptocurrencies (THG, 2021).
CONCLUSIONS
This study reveals the priority directions of cryptocurrency market transformations against the background of the Covid-
19 pandemic under the influence of various factors. In order to identify structural changes in the cryptocurrency market
in the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic, its segmentation was carried out depending on the market capitalization of
the cryptocurrency; the nature of the crypto asset’s movement; operations carried out on the market; on the region; on
consumers of services. At the same time, it was facilitated by the cryptocurrency market analysis in the functional and
institutional aspects.
To illustrate the transformational processes taking place in the cryptocurrency market due to the increased volatility and
unpredictability of financial markets, such groups of factors influencing its development as macroeconomic, price, environ-
mental, geographic, market, behavioral and technological were identified.
This analysis proved the dependence of the exchange rate of Bitcoin, as the largest cryptocurrency by capitalization, in
the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic during January 2020-September 2021, on the prices of gold, oil, the number of
daily detected cases of Covid-19 and deaths from Covid-19, the index of world shares MSCI ACWI, iShares MSCI All Country
Asia ex Japan ETF, Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index. At the same time, the Bitcoin rate affected the price of gold. The
results are proved on the basis of Granger test calculations.
The revealed specificity of the cryptocurrency market development during the pandemic made it possible to formulate the
following trends of the cryptocurrency market development in the post-COVID period, in particular, the growth of investors'
interest in cryptocurrencies due to the ICO collapse; growth of payments in cryptocurrencies; strengthening the regulatory
landscape on a global and national scale; integration of the cryptocurrency market with traditional finance; attracting non-
typical participants to the cryptocurrency business; expansion of participants and infrastructure of the cryptocurrency
market, due to the rapid cryptocurrency market development, in particular, the production of equipment for its operation.
In conclusion, the cryptocurrency market in pandemic conditions creates both challenges (environmental, regulatory, con-
sumer protection) for society and opportunities for further development of financial services as well as integration of the
cryptocurrency market with the traditional financial system.
Further efforts should establish new measures to limit the impact of cryptocurrency risks on the functioning of financial
systems.
REFERENCES
Aljazeera (2021). China bans finance firms from
servicing crypto transactions.
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2021/5/19/chin
a-bans-finance-firms-from-servicing-crypto-
transactions.
Apergis, N., Koutmos, D., & Payne, J. (2021).
Convergence in cryptocurrency prices? the role of
market microstructure.
Finance Research Letters, 40
,
101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101685
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pi
i/S1544612319314114.
Arias-Oliva, M., Pelegrín-Borondo, J., & Matías-
Clavero, G. (2019). Variables Influencing
Cryptocurrency Use: A Technology Acceptance Model
in Spain. Front Psychol, 10, 475. doi:
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00475.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436
067/.
Asokan, M. (2021, April 24). Cryptocurrency
exchanges in India on hiring frenzy as user base
grows.
https://bfsi.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/bloc
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
123
kchain/cryptocurrency-exchanges-in-india-on-hiring-
frenzy-as-user-base-grows/82226922.
Bambrough, B. (2020, June 18). The Bitcoin Market
Is Totally Dominated by A Tiny Number of Pro
Traders.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2020/
06/18/the-bitcoin-market-is-totally-dominated-by-a-
tiny-number-of-pro-traders/?sh=20c46fbd608c.
Bbc (2021, June 17). World Bank rejects El Salvador
request for Bitcoin help.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-57507386.
Bianchi, D., Guidolin, M., & Pedio, M. (2020).
Dissecting Time-Varying Risk Exposures in
Cryptocurrency Markets. BAFFI CAREFIN Centre
Research Paper No. 2020-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3609949
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id
=3609949.
Biers, J. (2021, February 8). Electric carmaker Tesla
invests $1.5 bn in bitcoin.
https://techxplore.com/news/2021-02-bitcoin-tesla-
investment.html?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_mediu
m=cpc&utm_campaign=TechXplore.com_TrendMD_
1.
Browne, R. (2021, February 22). Forget bitcoin
fintech is the ‘real Covid-19 story,’ JPMorgan says.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/22/forget-bitcoin-
fintech-is-the-real-covid-19-story-jpmorgan-
says.html.
Cabuk, U., & Silenzi, M. (2021). Cryptocurrencies in
Retail: Consumer Adoption Report 2021.
CryptoRefills Labs. 54р.
https://cryptorefills.s3.amazonaws.com/report/crypto
currencies-in-retail-2021.pdf.
Coinmarketcap (2021). Today's Cryptocurrency
Prices by Market Cap. https://coinmarketcap.com/.
Ecb (2015, February 15). Virtual currency schemes
a further analysis. European Central Bank.
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/virtualcurr
encyschemesen.pdf.
Eia (2021). Spot Prices (Crude Oil in Dollars per
Barrel, Products in Dollars per Gallon)
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_spt_s1_d.htm
Finance (2021). Bitcoin USD (BTC-USD)
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BTC-USD/history
Finance (2021a). iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex
Japan ETF (AAXJ)
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/AAXJ/history?p=AA
XJ.
Finance (2021b). iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF
(IEUR)
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/IEUR/history?p=IE
UR.
Finance (2021c). Wilshire 5000 Total Market Inde
(W5000)
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EW5000/history
?p=%5EW5000.
Finance (2021d). iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI).
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MCHI/history?p=M
CHI.
Globenewswire (2020, November 17). Global
Cryptocurrency Market (2020 to 2025) - Growth,
Trends, and Forecasts.
https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-
release/2020/11/17/2128140/28124/en/Global-
Cryptocurrency-Market-2020-to-2025-Growth-
Trends-and-Forecasts.html.
Gold (2021, February 2). Gold prices.
https://www.gold.org/goldhub/data/gold-prices.
Harper, J. (2020, November 18). Cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin hits three-year high as investors jump in.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54982604.
Hazlewood, T. (2018, February 18). Is Bitcoin an
Environmental Disaster Waiting to Happen?
https://levelup.gitconnected.com/is-bitcoin-an-
environmental-disaster-waiting-to-happen-
d770e4bea5e9.
Hightech (2018, October 29). Bitcoin mining could
increase Earth's average temperature by 2 °C.
https://hightech.fm/2018/10/30/mining-temperature.
Howson, P. (2021, February 17). Bitcoin isn’t getting
greener: four environmental myths about
cryptocurrency debunked.
https://theconversation.com/bitcoin-isnt-getting-
greener-four-environmental-myths-about-
cryptocurrency-debunked-155329.
Ixbt (2021, June 4). The price of Bitcoin fell on the
background of a new message from Elon Musk in
Twitter.
https://www.ixbt.com/news/2021/06/04/bitcoin-
razbil-serdce-ilonu-masku.html.
Ji, Q., Bourid, E., Roubaude, D., & Kristoufek, L.
(2019). Information interdependence among energy,
cryptocurrency and major commodity markets.
Energy Economics, vol. 81, pp. 1042-1055.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.005
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0
140988319301896.
ФІНАНСОВО-КРЕДИТНА ДІЯЛЬНІСТЬ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТЕОРІЇ ТА ПРАКТИКИ
Том 1 (48), 2023
124
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
Jones, H., & Wilson, T. (2021, June 10). Bank
regulators plot toughest capital rule for bitcoin.
https://www.reuters.com/business/bank-regulators-
plan-conservative-capital-rule-bitcoin-2021-06-10/.
Khatri, Y. (2021, June 10). Coinbase partners with
401(k) advisor to offer crypto investments for
retirement accounts.
https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/108034/coinb
ase-forusall-401k-advisor-crypto-retirement-
accounts.
Kuznyetsova A., Sydorchenko, T., Zadvorna, O.,
Nikonenko, U., Khalina, O. (2021). Assessment of
aspects of the COVID-19 crisis in the context of
ensuring economic security. International Journal of
Safety and Security Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp.
615-622. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.11060.
Lahmiria, S., & Bekiros, S. (2020). The impact of
COVID-19 pandemic upon stability and sequential
irregularity of equity and cryptocurrency markets.
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 138, 109936.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109936.
Laurent, L. (2021, January 26). Bitcoin Is an
Incredibly Dirty Business. This is virtual money with
a real carbon footprint.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-
01-26/is-bitcoin-mining-worth-the-environmental-
cost.
Lulay, R. (2021, May 25). Suddenly Rich: 60% of
Bitcoin Investors Complain of Negative Impact on
Relationships, Yet Crypto Adoption Continues Apace.
https://block-builders.net/suddenly-rich-60-of-
bitcoin-investors-complain-of-negative-impact-on-
relationships-yet-crypto-adoption-continues-apace/.
Markets and markets. (2021). Cryptocurrency Market
with impact of COVID-19 by Offering (Hardware, and
Software), Process (Mining and Transaction), Type,
Application (Trading, Remittance, Payment: Peer-to-
Peer Payment, Ecommerce, and Retail), and
Geography - Global Forecast to 2026.
https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-
Reports/cryptocurrency-market-158061641.html.
Mazer, J. (2021). Demystifying Cryptocurrencies,
Blockchain, and ICOs.
https://www.toptal.com/finance/market-research-
analysts/cryptocurrency-market.
Mind (2021, February 11). The oldest US bank BNY
Mellon will enter the cryptocurrency market.
https://mind.ua/news/20222060-najstarishij-bank-
ssha-bny-mellon-vijde-na-rinok-kriptovalyut.
Mnif, Е, Jarboui, А., & Mouakharc, К. (2020). How
the cryptocurrency market has performed during
COVID 19? A multifractal analysis. Finance Research
Letters, 36, 101647.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101647
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pi
i/S1544612320306346?via%3Dihub.
Muhn, J. (2020, July 10). How the coronavirus
impacts the appetite for cryptocurrency?
https://www.campdenfb.com/article/how-
coronavirus-impacts-appetite-cryptocurrency.
Noda, A. (2020). On the evolution of cryptocurrency
market efficiency. Applied Economics Letters, 28(6),
pp.433-439, DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1758617
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1350
4851.2020.1758617.
Pkgstore (2021). Covid-19.
https://pkgstore.datahub.io/core/covid-
19/worldwide-
aggregate_csv/data/95fb3cf2cb15f8caa084a3303caf
9917/worldwide-aggregate_csv.csv.
Prime (2021). Tesla made a million dollars from the
sale of bitcoin.
https://1prime.ru/finance/20210427/833556686.html
Raghubir, P., & Das, S. (1970). The Psychology of
Financial Decision Making: A Case for Theory-Driven
Experimental Enquiry.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2580663_
The_Psychology_of_Financial_Decision_Making_A_Ca
se_for_Theory-Driven_Experimental_Enquiry.
Rahul, N. (2021, May 5). Crypto Mining Hardware
Market Anticipates $2.8B Growth by 2024.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/crypto-mining-
hardware-market-anticipates-070800332.html.
Research and markets (2021). Global Cryptocurrency
Market with Impact of COVID-19 by Offering
(Hardware, Software), Process (Mining, Transaction),
Type, Application (Trading, Remittance, Payment:
Peer-to-Peer Payment, e-Commerce, and Retail), and
Geography - Forecast to 2026.
https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/53166
95/global-cryptocurrency-market-with-impact-of-
covid?utm_source=GNOM&utm_medium=PressRelea
se&utm_code=5h6nwg&utm_campaign=1532703+-
+Global+Cryptocurrency+Market+Report+2021-
2026%3a+Peer-
To+Peer+Payment+to+Dominate+the+Market+&ut
m_exec=chdo54prd.
Sg (2021). iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/quote/ACWI/history?p
=ACWI.
Sotinel J. (2020, November 8). Virtual gold? Bitcoin's
rise sparks new debate amid pandemic.
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
125
https://techxplore.com/news/2020-11-virtual-gold-
bitcoin-debate-
pandemic.html?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_medium
=cpc&utm_campaign=TechXplore.com_TrendMD_1.
Suslenko, V., Zatonatska, T., Dluhopolskyi, O., &
Kuznyetsova, A. (2022). Use of cryptocurrencies
bitcoin and ethereum in the field of e-commerce:
case study of Ukraine. Financial and Credit Activity
Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(42), 6272.
https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.1.42.2022.3603.
The paypers (2021a, May 18). Mecum Auctions now
accepts crypto for collector car purchases.
https://thepaypers.com/cryptocurrencies/mecum-
auctions-now-accepts-crypto-for-collector-car-
purchases--1249065.
The paypers (2021b, July 5). The Pavilions Hotels
and Resorts now allows crypto payments.
https://thepaypers.com/cryptocurrencies/the-
pavilions-hotels-and-resorts-now-allows-crypto-
payments--1250180.
The paypers (2021c, May 14). Argentina instructs
crypto exchanges to file transactions data.
https://thepaypers.com/cryptocurrencies/argentina-
instructs-crypto-exchanges-to-file-transactions-data--
1249034.
Thg (2021, February 18). Internet cafes in Vietnam
are moving to mining.
http://www.thg.ru/technews/20210216_181449.html
Vidal-Tomás, D. (2021). Transitions in the
cryptocurrency market during the COVID-19
pandemic: A network analysis. Finance Research
Letters, vol. 43, 101981.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.101981
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1
544612321000623.
Volosovych, S., & Baraniuk, Y. (2018). Tax control of
cryptocurrency transactions in Ukraine. Banks and
Bank Systems, vol. 13(2), pp. 89-106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(2).2018.08
https://www.businessperspectives.org/index.php/jou
rnals/banks-and-bank-systems/issue-286/tax-control-
of-cryptocurrency-transactions-in-ukraine.
Volosovych, S., Zelenitsa, I., Kondratenko, D.,
Szymla, W., & Mamchur, R. (2021). Transformation
of insurance technologies in the context of a
pandemic. Insurance Markets and Companies, vol.
12(1), pp.1-13. doi:
https://doi.org/10.21511/ins.12(1).2021.01.
Yang, H. (2019). Behavioral Anomalies in
Cryptocurrency Markets.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3174421.
Zakon (2018). Which country is cheaper to mine
bitcoin? https://www.zakon-i-
normativ.info/index.php/novosti-mirovoj-
ekonomiki?start=3776.
Zhu, Y., Dickinson, D., & Li, J. (2017, March 22).
Analysis on the influence factors of Bitcoin’s price
based on VEC model. Financial Innovation, 3.
https://jfin-
swufe.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40854-
017-0054-0.
Zheliuk, T., & Brechko, O. (2016). The use of
cryptocurrency in the payment market: new
opportunities for national economies. Bulletin of the
Ternopil National Economic University, vol. 3, pp. 50-
60.
http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bitstream/316497/14881
/1/%d0%96%d0%b5%d0%bb%d1%8e%d0%ba%2
0%d0%a2..pdf.
Kuziuk, D. (2019, December 6). Features of Bitcoin
mining in China: why miners choose China?
https://2bitcoins.ru/osobennosti-majninga-bitkoina-v-
kitae/.
Mazaraki, A., & Volosovych, S. (2021). Dominant to
the FinTech market during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bulletin of the Kiev National University of Trade and
Economics. Vol.2, pp. 4-19.
Malanov, A., & Lure, S. (2019, September 17). We
evaluate the economic effect of freedom from web
miners. https://securelist.ru/electricity-and-
mining/94714/.
Matseluh, N. (2016). Price anomalies formation at
the Ukrainian securities market. Bulletin of ONU
named after I.I. Mechnikov, vol. 21(3), pp.152-156.
http://visnyk-onu.od.ua/journal/2016_21_3/35.pdf.
Podnos, V. (2016). Network analysis. Dictionary of
terms.
https://mistosite.org.ua/uk/articles/merezhevyi-
analiz-slovnyk-terminiv.
ФІНАНСОВО-КРЕДИТНА ДІЯЛЬНІСТЬ: ПРОБЛЕМИ ТЕОРІЇ ТА ПРАКТИКИ
Том 1 (48), 2023
126
DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.1.48.2023.3949
Волосович C., Шолойко А., Шевченко Л.
ТРАНСФОРМАЦІЯ КРИПТОВАЛЮТНОГО РИНКУ В УМОВАХ ПАНДЕМІЇ COVID-19
Пандемія та викликані нею зміни в різних сферах життєдіяльності людини трансформували й поведінку споживачів,
зокрема й на криптовалютному ринку. Метою є виявлення пріоритетних напрямів перетворень, що відбуваються на
криптовалютному ринку в умовах пандемії Covid-19 під впливом певних груп чинників. Виявлено системний та ме-
режеві підходи до розуміння криптовалютного ринку. Запропоновано розглядати криптовалютний ринок із функці-
ональної та інституційної точок зору. Обґрунтовано ознаки сегментації криптовалютного ринку: залежно від ринко-
вої капіталізації криптовалюти; від характеру руху криптоактивів; від операцій, що здійснюються на ринку; від ре-
гіону; від споживачів послуг. Систематизовано чинники впливу на функціонування криптовалютного ринку на ос-
нові виокремлення таких їх груп: макроекономічні, цінові, екологічні, географічні, ринкові, поведінкові, технологічні.
Виявлено вплив на курс Bitcoin-цін на золото, нафту, щоденної кількості захворілих на Covid-19 та померлих від
Covid-19, індексу світових акцій MSCI ACWI, iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF, Wilshire 5000 Total Market
Index. Обґрунтовано такі тенденції розвитку криптовалютного ринку в постковідний період, як зростання зацікав-
леності інвесторів криптовалютами на тлі згортання первинного розміщення монет; зростання платежів у крипто-
валютах; посилення регуляторного ландшафту в глобальному та національному масштабі; інтеграція криптовалю-
тного ринку з традиційними фінансами; залучення до криптовалютного бізнесу нетипових учасників; розширення
учасників інфраструктури криптовалютного ринку, зумовленого бурхливим розвитком криптовалютного ринку, зо-
крема виробництва обладнання для його функціонування.
Ключові слова: криптовалюта, біткоїн, майнінг, криптоактиви, криптовалютний бізнес
JEL Класифікація: E49, E51, P44, O31
... These types of cryptocurrencies are unaffected by volatile investor sentiment or financial crises. Previously, a team of researchers (2023) emphasized that the development of the cryptocurrency market is influenced by such groups of factors as macroeconomic, price, environmental, geographic, market, behavioural, and technological [27]. At the same time, they proved that the Bitcoin exchange rate during the pandemic is dependent on the prices of gold, oil, the daily detected number of COVID-19 patients and deaths from COVID-19, the MSCI ACWI global stock index, iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF, Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index. ...
... 47.1% of respondents are men and 52.9% are women. The vast majority of 39.4% are respondents aged [18][19][20][21][22]18.3% are respondents aged [23][24][25][26][27][28]8.7% are respondents aged 29-33, 20.2% are respondents aged 34-40 and 13.3 % -respondents over 40 years old. The results of the survey were subjected to processing and statistical analysis, based on which the segments of the cryptocurrency market were identified that are attractive for users and potential users of cryptocurrencies in Ukraine for carrying out operations in war conditions. ...
... This work is a continuation of S. Volosovych, A. Sholoiko, and L. Shevchenko's (2023) [27] study of the cryptocurrency market in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. It supplemented the previous study in terms of identifying the impact of threats of military action on the functioning of the cryptocurrency asset market. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Russian-Ukrainian war transformed the needs of consumers of financial services, both in Ukraine and abroad. On the one hand, the civilian population and the Armed Forces of Ukraine needed immediate help from the international community. On the other hand, individual and institutional investors were concerned about threats to traditional financial investments. The purpose of the article is to identify the priority directions for the development of the cryptocurrency asset market against the background of the Russian-Ukrainian war. The article presents an analysis of the cryptocurrency asset market with an emphasis on its structural changes in the conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian war. In the study, a survey was conducted to find out the impact of the war on the Ukrainian cryptocurrency market. The analysis of the survey results substantiates the hypothesis about the impact of increased hacking attacks by pro-Russian forces and missile attacks on the functioning of the cryptocurrency market in Ukraine. It has been confirmed that investments and payments are promising segments of the cryptocur-rency market in Ukraine, in which, the most interested users and potential users of cryptocurrency are. Based on the received data, the weaknesses and strengths of the functioning of the cryptocurrency market in the conditions of war were identified. Threats and opportunities for the development of the cryptocurrency market against the background of Russian armed aggression are substantiated. The conducted research made it possible to formulate scenarios for the development of the cryptocurrency asset market in Ukraine in war conditions and the conditions for their implementation.
... Key factors contributing to this surge include the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies and the innovative blockchain technology underpinning them (Chen et al., 2019). Moreover, the integration of cryptocurrencies with traditional finance has sparked increased interest among investors (Volosovych et al., 2023). ...
... This structure enables peer-to-peer transactions without the need for intermediaries like banks (Andolfatto & Martin, 2022). Additionally, rapid technological innovation within the cryptocurrency sphere attracts diverse participants, consequently expanding the market infrastructure (Volosovych et al., 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Este estudio investiga los efectos del día de la semana en el mercado digital, con un enfoque en bitcoin y ethereum, abarcando desde el 1º de julio de 2020 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2023, en el período posterior al COVID-19. Empleando pruebas paramétricas y no paramétricas junto con el modelo GARCH (1,1), se analizó la dinámica del mercado. Los hallazgos indican un efecto significativo del día de la semana en ethereum, caracterizado por notables variaciones de rendimiento entre diferentes días, mientras que itcoin no muestra anomalías de calendario discernibles, lo que sugiere una mayor eficiencia del mercado. La susceptibilidad de ethereum a estos efectos subraya las complejidades actuales del mercado. Las disparidades en las anomalías del calendario surgen de la evolución de la dinámica del mercado, las diferencias metodológicas y la naturaleza especulativa del comercio de criptomonedas. Además, el mercado descentralizado y global complica la identificación precisa de los efectos en todo el mercado. Este estudio proporciona evidencia empírica sobre los efectos del día de la semana en el mercado de criptomonedas, lo que facilita a los inversionistas refinar las estrategias comerciales y la gestión de riesgos. Se justifica realizar más investigaciones para explorar los mecanismos subyacentes y monitorear los desarrollos regulatorios y tecnológicos para obtener información de los inversionistas.
... Rapid price growth encourages cryptocurrency miners to participate in production. They become investors, which leads to an increase in the value of cryptocurrencies (Volosovych et al., 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Las tecnologías económicas modernas se están transformando en las condiciones actuales de digitalización. Las criptodivisas operan en el mercado en determinadas condiciones e interactúan de cierta manera con los mercados financieros tradicionales. Dado que las criptodivisas son dinámicas en el mercado, se ofrecen perspectivas para el futuro uso de las nuevas divisas y posibles formas de interacción con los mercados financieros tradicionales. El objetivo principal del estudio es un análisis exhaustivo y las direcciones prospectivas de la interacción de las criptodivisas con los mercados financieros tradicionales. En el curso del modelo de la influencia de los indicadores económicos fundamentales y las tendencias del mercado de valores en la dinámica de los precios de las principales cryptocurrencies. Los resultados de la investigación permiten aclarar la naturaleza económica de las criptodivisas como instrumentos financieros específicos y mejorar los modelos existentes de gestión de inversiones teniendo en cuenta las propiedades estadísticas de los activos financieros virtuales. Basándose en el análisis de los nombres del mercado, se demuestra que las criptobolsas y criptodivisas mundiales se centran en las personas, la gestión, el ahorro y los servicios. Se ha estudiado el mercado internacional de criptodivisas y su estado general. Las conclusiones se reflejan en un estudio exhaustivo de cryptocurrencies y su rápido crecimiento como la principal innovación en la economía mundial y de Ucrania.
Article
Full-text available
The concept of trust has been extensively explored by governments, researchers, and academic communities focusing on public authorities and the financial system, albeit in separate contexts. Trust plays a vital role in both sectors, influencing various aspects of governance, economic stability, and societal well-being. However, the relationship and interdependencies between trust in the government and trust in the financial system remain relatively unexplored. In addressing this gap, this study aims to improve the understanding of the role of trust in the socio-economic system and provide a framework for analysing the complex causal mechanisms between developments in the financial and public sectors using trust concepts. To achieve this, the study adopts the Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM) method in combination with the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) as the methodological approach. The results highlight that even a small decline in trust can have severe repercussions on the stability of the financial system, deposit levels, exchange rate stability, and the prevalence of non-performing loans. Additionally, violations of trust in the financial sector also impact the development of the public sector, resulting in decreased trust in the government, fiscal stability, tax revenues, and government bond purchases. The study also demonstrated that when trust in both the financial sector and the government is eroded simultaneously, the complexities and the extent of negative consequences are amplified. These findings emphasize the interconnected nature of trust dynamics in both sectors and underscore the importance of a comprehensive approach to addressing trust-related challenges.
Chapter
This chapter investigates how blockchain technology is revolutionizing the conventional stock market ecosystem. Blockchain is becoming a disruptive force in many industries, and the financial sector specifically. The stock market has been one area where it has attracted a lot of attention. This study investigates the possible advantages, difficulties, and effects of incorporating blockchain technology into the architecture of the stock market. The chapter starts by giving a comprehensive introduction to blockchain technology, highlighting its safe and decentralized characteristics.
Article
Full-text available
Despite many revolutionary asset pricing models developed over the past decades, traditional finance does not explain investor behavior very well. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of behavioral biases on the investment decisions of investors of Pakistan Stock Exchange. In addition, the moderating influence of investment experience investigated in this study. The findings were reported using a sample of 230 individual investors, who make their own investments, typically through a mutual fund, bank, or internet broker. They make investments to achieve their unique investment objectives, such as saving for retirement, a child's education, or increasing their overall wealth. The influence of behavioral biases on investment decisions was calculated using regression analysis. Regression results show that beta and t-values are significant and have a significant impact on investment decisions. Regression findings show that Confirmation Bias, Gamblers Fallacy Bias, Negativity Bias, Bandwagon Effect Bias, Loss Aversion Bias, and Overconfidence Bias all have a substantial impact on Investment Decisions. Status quo prejudice and endowment bias have a favorable but minor influence on Investment Decisions. Investment Experience is regarded as an essential component that contributes to successful decision making under risk and uncertainty, however the results of this study show that moderating variables have a minor influence. According to the findings, the moderating variable had no effect on the connection between behavioral biases and investment decisions. And the reason for this is that behavioral biases persist regardless of investing experience.
Article
Full-text available
Crisis phenomena, such as economic downturns, health emergencies and geopolitical conflicts, had a significant impact on the transparency of information support for public financial management processes and the development of digitalization of the economy.The objective of the study is to assess the current state of information support and transparency of the management of fiscal risks caused by state-owned enterprises' activities under uncertainty.Within the study, the existing international approaches to identifying and assessing fiscal risks are analyzed; the areas for improving information support for managing fiscal risks caused by the activities of state-owned enterprises in emergency situations are identified; the impact of digital finance development on mitigating fiscal risks caused by emergencies is assessed. Proposals to increase the transparency of public finances and create additional revenues to the state budget by the development of innovative technologies are substantiated.Implementation of fiscal and monetary policy measures to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 and ensure sustainable post-pandemic recovery requires relevant financial information reflecting the country's financial position. A reliable source of such information is public financial and budgetary statements prepared by IPSAS and on an accrual basis. Given the negative impact of uncertainty caused by the coronavirus pandemic and war on the activities of state-owned enterprises, an important tool for improving the efficiency of fiscal risk management is the unification of approaches to establishing indicators for assessing relevant risks and providing information for their calculation. In response to lockdowns and social distancing measures during crises, citizens have increasingly relied on digital channels to access government services, pay taxes, and receive financial support. This has necessitated improved digital infrastructure and service delivery mechanisms.
Article
Full-text available
The article examines integration of cryptocurrencies as electronic payment systems in e-commerce enterprises. Practical usage of Ethereum and Bitcoin cryptocurrencies as electronic payment systems, as well as factors that may affect their functionality are studied. Coinbase Commerce and Bitpay, as market leaders in cryptocurrency payment providers, were analyzed to compare integration issues and commission analysis with traditional payment systems LiqPay, PayPal. It is determined that the factors influencing the integration of cryptocurrencies in the enterprise include the field in which this enterprise is operating, instability of the national currency, development of information technology. It has been proven that e-commerce companies specializing on selling consumer goods could use hybrid cryptocurrency payments in Bitcoin in 50% of transactions and Ethereum in 65% of transactions in the studied timeframe to reduce the cost of the transaction compared to the LiqPay system. Key words: electronic payment systems, cryptocurrency, e-commerce, transactions. JEL Classification D2, C50, G23, G41 Formulas: 0; fig.: 9; tabl.: 2; bibl.: 16.
Article
Full-text available
In this letter, we identify the transitions of the cryptocurrency market during the pandemic by means of a network analysis. This method allows us to observe that COVID-19 significantly affected cryptocurrencies during a short period of financial panic, from 12 March 2020 to 1 April 2020, giving rise to a remarkable increase of market synchronisation. However, since April 2020, the cryptocurrency market progressively recovered its initial state, since the strong synchronisation, observed as a consequence of COVID-19, continuously disappeared. Therefore, our analysis highlights different market phases, which can be related to some of the phenomena reported in the existing literature.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected different sectors of the economy, including insurance, and has become a problem and a clear catalyst for innovation. The pandemic has highlighted some inefficiencies of the traditional model of interaction between insurers and their customers and focused on insurance companies’ efforts on innovations and investments in the digital future. That is why the article aims to generalize the transformations of the institutional environment in the InsurTech ecosystem in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and identify prospects for its development in the post-pandemic period.The analysis of the functioning of InsurTech as an ecosystem necessitated the identification of challenges for the insurance market in the context of COVID-19. The peculiarities of the insurance market development have been identified: the blurring of boundaries between insurers, BigTech firms, and technological partners; expanding interaction with policyholders based on the principle of support and the use of social networks; changes in the structure of the implemented insurance services; an increase in insurance fraud cases; the growing demand for parametric insurance products; introduction of a digital approach to the interaction with customers and employees, modernization of technological infrastructure and expansion of data processing capabilities; remote risk identification; acceleration in the use of financial technologies by insurance market participants. There is a transformation of the insurance market under the influence of business processes digitalization because insurers are aware of the importance of InsurTech in the formation of competitive advantages. For many companies, the crisis has strengthened their innovative development strategies and accelerated the implementation of financial technology tools in their business processes against the background of modernization of technological infrastructure. Chatbots, telematics, the Internet of Things, machine learning, artificial intelligence, predictive analytics, etc., are widely used. In the future, InsurTech will also play an important role in introducing digital innovations in the insurance market.
Article
Full-text available
The first commercial transaction with the first cryptocurrency in 2010 marked the start of a revolution in transactions. Blockchain and cryptocurrencies will dramatically transform how we do transactions, just as the Internet revolutionized how we communicate. Currently, more than 2,000 cryptocurrencies are quoted on the market, and many more are being launched in initial coin offerings for use as an exchange method in a specific business ecosystem or as rights to assets or liabilities. As an emerging fintech, cryptocurrencies open up many opportunities, but they also pose significant challenges and limitations. This paper analyzes the key factors for the successful development of a cryptocurrency from a consumer-behavior perspective. Using a technology acceptance theoretical framework, we test a model able to explain almost 85% of the intention to use cryptocurrencies. Surprisingly, risk was not a significant factor. This could be because most of the respondents considered operating with cryptocurrencies to be risky; the lack of variability in their responses to the questions about perceived risk would explain this lack of explanatory power. However, willingness to manage cryptocurrency risk could be a precondition for adoption. The performance expectancy for a given cryptocurrency was the most important factor for its success. The research was conducted in Spain with college-educated adults with basic knowledge of the Internet.
Article
Full-text available
The current global financial market is witnessing the activation of cryptocurrency as a payment instrument and a means of accumulation. However, the risks of money laundering, terrorism financing and tax evasion that cryptocurrency transactions imply lead to the need to implement their state regulation, an important component of which is tax control. Therefore, the purpose of the article is to substantiate the value orientations when forming the system of cryptocurrency transactions tax control in Ukraine taking the positive experience of developed countries into account. The scientific results of the study consist in the emphasizing structural, functional, systemic and institutional approaches to understanding tax control, which became the basis for identifying the features of cryptocurrency transactions as a tax control object. It was revealed that the lack of personalization of the agreement parties, the relatively high level of information security, free international turnover and a decentralized payment system are the factors of the cryptocurrency market further development. On the other hand, this leads to the loss of tax revenues for Ukrainian budgetary system, taking into account the forecasted trends in the development of the cryptocurrency market by 2022 through methods of sums, least squares and expert estimates. Given the institutional approach to the understanding of tax control, an institutional structure of the cryptocurrency transactions tax control in Ukraine is proposed. It is established that domestic state institutions are able to carry out tax control over these transactions. It is also determined that introducing fiscal control will result in the receipt of additional revenues by budgets, reduction of shadow economy, counteraction to cybercrime and terrorism financing. The practical importance of the results is in the need to form an effective system of cryptocurrency transactions tax control as a function of public administration. It has been determined that transactions on cryptocurrency supply, on the determining exchange rates and transactions on cryptocurrency disposal should be an object of tax control in Ukraine. Mining transactions, receipt of income (profits) in the cryptocurrency are subject to general taxes, depending on the taxpayer’s legal status, in particular, personal income tax, corporate income tax and a unified social tax (UST). Taking into account the EU recommendations on the non-application of value added tax in the cryptocurrency transactions taxation, it is not appropriate to implement it in this area. Establishing tax control over cryptocurrency transactions will expand the powers of state authorities that are empowered to control observing financial discipline by economic agents in Ukraine and the financial capabilities of state and local budgets.
Article
Cryptocurrency markets are complex systems based on speculation. Where investors interact using strategies that generate some biases responsible for endogenous instabilities. This paper investigated the herding biases by quantifying the self-similarity intensity of cryptocurrency returns’ during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main purpose of this work was to study the level of cryptocurrency efficiency through multifractal analysis before and after the coronavirus pandemic. The empirical results proved that COVID-19 has a positive impact on the cryptocurrency market efficiency.
Article
We explore the evolution of the informational efficiency in 45 cryptocurrency markets and 16 international stock markets before and during COVID-19 pandemic. The measures of Largest Lyapunov Exponent (LLE) based on the Rosenstein's method and Approximate Entropy (ApEn), which are robust to small samples, are applied to price time series in order to estimate degrees of stability and irregularity in cryptocurrency and international stock markets. The amount of regularity infers on the unpredictability of fluctuations. The t-test and F-test are performed on estimated LLE and ApEn. In total, 36 statistical tests are performed to check for differences between time periods (pre- versus during COVID-19 pandemic samples) on the one hand, as well as check for differences between markets (cryptocurrencies versus stocks), on the other hand. During the COVID-19 pandemic period it was found that (a) the level of stability in cryptocurrency markets has significantly diminished while the irregularity level significantly augmented, (b) the level of stability in international equity markets has not changed but gained more irregularity, (c) cryptocurrencies became more volatile, (d) the variability in stability and irregularity in equities has not been affected, (e) cryptocurrency and stock markets exhibit a similar degree of stability in price dynamics, whilst finally (f) cryptocurrency exhibit a low level of regularity compared to international equity markets. We find that cryptos showed more instability and more irregularity during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to international stock markets. Thus, from an informational efficiency perspective, investing in digital assets during big crises as the COVID-19 pandemic, could be considered riskier as opposed to equities.
Article
The relationship between conventional and digital assets has become a prominent research topic, a focus partially emerging from the establishment of some large cryptocurrencies as legitimate financial assets. In this paper, we examine the information interdependence among various commodities—such as energy, metals and agricultural commodities—and leading cryptocurrencies. We use a time-varying entropy-based approach to identify the direction of return spillovers, and the results show that the nature of information spillovers changes over time, with cryptocurrencies becoming more connected and more prominent within the system; in contrast, the role of energy commodities is dependent on their price dynamics. We also apply a minimum spanning tree (MST) and various centrality measures, which reveal that agricultural and energy commodities form the core of the commodities network. The basic skeleton of the network remains rather stable over time even though the detailed connections are rather volatile. Our findings generally suggest that cryptocurrencies are integrated within broadly-defined commodity markets.