Content uploaded by Kaywan Salm Tafok
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kaywan Salm Tafok on Feb 22, 2023
Content may be subject to copyright.
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
//jaes.tu.edu.iqhttp:
Tikrit Journal of Administration
and Economics Sciences
ISSN: 1813-1719 (Print)
Abstract:
The research aims to identify the role of e-government represented (capabilities,
human resources, infrastructure) in the quality of comfortable decisions in its
dimensions (clarity of strategic vision, quality and reliability of information, strategic
thinking). 120) doctors in seven private hospitals in the city of Erbil, and in order to
measure the reality of e-government in a number of private hospitals in the city of Erbil
and its impact on the quality of strategic decisions, through the use of statistical
methods for social sciences (SPSS) in order to test the research hypotheses, the research
found To a set of results, including the availability of the level of e-government
requirements, with a strong relationship and impact of e-government on the quality of
strategic decisions.
Keywords: e-government, quality of strategic decisions.
The role of e-government requirements in the quality of strategic
decisions/An analytical study of the opinions of a sample of doctors
in a number of private hospitals in Erbil governorate
Lecturer: Kaywan Salm Tofek
Lecturer: Ali Ibrahim Wali
College of Administration and Economics
College of Administration and Economics
Salahaddin University/Erbil
Salahaddin University/Erbil
Kaywan.tafek@su.edu.krd
ali.weli@su.edu.krd
Assist. Prof. Ahmed Azan Shareef
College of Administration and Economics
Salahaddin University/Erbil
ahmed.shareef@su.edu.krd
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
120
(SPSS)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
2021/7/122021/9/12
Governance
GlobalizationPrivatization
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
(Andrea & Panayiotou, 2003: 351-337)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
Gilmore, 2006: 2)
Khare, 2008: 1)
Garg, et al 2011: 535)Sharma, 2013: 29-30)
Lin, 2001: 10)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
Davida, 2011: 1 (Alloghani, 2017: 176) (Taveter, 2017: 26)
(Jackson & Davim, 2011: 37)paul, et al., 2013: 2
Dawes, 2008: 589
(Zhu & Kraemer, 2005: 95)
Daft & Lewin, 2008: 5)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
Ibrahim & Yusoff, 2015
(Harrison, 1995: 53)
Anchor, 2016: 648
(Dranev, 2017: 00-00)
Pablo, 2007: 319)
(Brandau, 2010: 72)
Correa, 2016: 5)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
Alkaraan, 2015: 53-66)
Coleman, 2016: 936)
(Intezari, 2017: 71)
Timlon, 2011: 89)
(Rehm, 2012: 23)
Joneidi Jafari, 2017: 00-00)
Gutiérrez-García, 2016: 245)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
(Alkaraan, 2016: 505)Majeed, 2016: 559)
Elbanna, 2014: 228
Wei & Wang: 2010: 238-240)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
Oswald et al., 1994: 477-479
Wilson, 1992: 18-20
Cossette, 2001: 173-175
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
(den Ouden et al., 2006: 821-822)
Management Information System
Meeker & Escoba, 2004: 1-3
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
(Kazmi & Naaranoja, 2015: 43-45)
Top et al., 2015: 5)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
(Abbott et al., 2005: 531-534)
Rosenthal et al., 2015: 1-4
(Younesi & Roghanian, 2015: 385-388)
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
CMC
120
24548.9
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
1
79
65.8
41
34.2
120
100
2
30
24
20
3140
47
39.16
4150
38
31.6
51
11
9.16
120
100
3
37
30.08
56
46.6
27
22.5
120
100
120
100
4
10
49
40.83
1020
67
53.3
21
7
5.83
45
100
65.8
34.2
31404150 39.1631.6
51
46.6
30.08
22.553.3
10205.83
20
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
X1-X7 3.71 0.93
%74.31 X4
3.950.93
X6
3.50.92%70
X8-X143.5
0.98%70X8%76.6
3.80.92
X11
%62.23.10.89
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
N = 120
Y1-Y5 3.82 0.86
%76.44 Y1
4.060.73
Y5
3.671.1%73.4
Y6-Y10
3.53 1.06 %76.6 Y9
%773.851.2
Y10
%63.6
3.331.1
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
Y11-Y153.66 0.93
%73.3Y14%78.2
3.910.93
Y13
%69.2 3.46
0.95
0.05
0.708**
(0.05)N=120
0.708**
(0.05)N = 120
0.651*0.570*
0.651*
0.570*
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
C
F
P
R2
-0.058
0.977
T
t
189.42
0.00
0.712
-0.24
14.56
(0.05)N = 120
%71.2
F
P
0.05
C
F
P
R2
-0.352
1.064
T
t
83.08
0.00
0.712
-0.764
9.044
(0.05)N = 120
F 82.12 R2
%71.2
C
F
P
R2
1.11
0.703
T
t
104.8
0.00
0.682
2.910)
10.385
(0.05)N = 120
F 104.8 %68.2
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
1. alloghani, m. a. m. a., hussain, a., al-jumeily, d., aljaaf, a. j., & mustafina, j., (2017),
gamification in e-governance: development of an online gamified system to enhance
government entities services delivery and promote public's awareness. in proceedings of
the 5th international conference on information and education technology
2. andrea panayiotou, p., (2003), electronic governance for the lands and surveys
department in cyprus, property management, 21(5).
3. daft, r.l., & lewin, a.y., (2008), perspective-rigor and relevance in organization studies:
idea migration and academic journal evolution, organization science, 19 (1).
4. .dessler, g., sutherland, g., & cole, n. d., (2012), human resources management in
canada. pearson education canada.
5. davids, e., (2011), assessing the e-readiness of the south african social security agency
(sassa) regional office western cape and its customers (doctoral dissertation,
stellenbosch: university of stellenbosch).
6. dawes, s. s., (2008), the evolution and continuing challenges of e‐governance, public
administration review, 68 (s1).
7. garg, j., garg, s. b., & choudhary, n., (2011), effective implementation of e-governance
in technical institutions in india using ict to make them world class. an international
journal of engineering sciences, 4.
8. hatto, p., & maclachlan, s., (2010), standardising nanotechnologies. materials world, 18
(12).
9. ibrahim, h., & yusoff, y. m., (2015), user characteristics as antecedents of techno stress
towards ehrm: from experts’ views. procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 172.
10. islam, g. z., khan, m. i., & mazady, m. a. b., (2008), december). developing a model of
e-governance for urban and rural areas of bangladesh. in computer and information
technology, (2008), iccit. 11th international conference.
11. jackson, m. j., & davim, j. p., (2011), machining with abrasives (pp.4-5), new york:
springer.
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
12. jamwal, s. s., gupta, r., & sambyal, n., (2011), penetration of e-governance in j & k: a
case study of national informatics centre, awaaz-e-awam and online employment
exchange.
13. khare, (2008), s. e-governance: success story and the way ahead. iso 690.
14. lin, anmin, (2001), successful strategies for e-commerce.
15. maramura, t. c., & thakhathi, d. r., (2016), electronic governance tools as support
systems for the public service in south africa.
16. paul j.h. schoemaker, steve krupp,and samantha howland, (2013), strategic leadership:
the essential skills, January-february 2013 harvard business review.
17. saxena, k. b. c., (2005)., towards excellence in e-governance. international journal of
public sector management, 18 (6),500.
18. sharma, m. k. e-governance: a gateway to smart governance. 2013: http://wikieduca tor.
org/images/0/0f. egovbook. pdf [2014-07-02].
19. gilmore, a., & d’souza, c., (2006), service excellence in e-governance issues: an indian
case study. joaag, 1(1), 2.
20. taveter, k., (2017), the challenges of e-governance implementation in nepal.
21. vaassen, e., (2010), control and the controller function, ecj monthly magazine for
accountancy and economics.
22. zhu, k., & kraemer, k. l., (2005), post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-
business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry, information
systems research, 16 (1).
23. harrison, e. f., & pelletier, m. a., (1995), a paradigm for strategic decision success.
management decision, 33 (7).
24. wand, y., & wang, r. y., (1996), anchoring data quality, dimensions in ontological
foundations. communications of the acm, 39 (11), 86-95
25. dranev, y., levin, a., & kuchin, i., (2017), r & d effects, risks and strategic decisions:
evidence from listed firms in r & d-intensive countries. foresight, (just-accepted).
26. pablo, a. l., (2007), using policy capturing to understand strategic decisions-concepts
and a mergers and acquisitions application. in research methodology in strategy and
management (pp. 319-341), emerald group publishing limited.
27. brandau, m., & hoffjan, a. h., (2010), exploring the involvement of management
accounting in strategic decisions and control: the case of offshoring. journal of
accounting & organizational change, 6 (1).
28. correa, c. r., & cagnin, c. h., (2016), prospective games for defence strategic decisions in
brazil. foresight, 18 (1).
29. alkaraan, f., (2015), strategic investment decision-making perspectives. in advances in
mergers and acquisitions emerald group publishing limited.
30. coleman, l., coleman, l., casselman, r. m., & casselman, r. m., (2016), optimizing
decisions using knowledge risk strategy. journal of knowledge management, 20 (5).
31. intezari, a., intezari, a., gressel, s., & gressel, s., (2017), information and reformation in
km systems: big data and strategic decision-making. journal of knowledge management,
21 (1).
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
32. timlon, j., (2011), sustainable strategic sourcing decisions: the logic of appropriateness
applied to the brazilian market. strategic outsourcing: an international journal, 4(1).
33. rehm, w., uhlaner, r., & west, a., (2012), taking a longer-term look at m & a value
creation. mckinsey quarterly, 2.
34. joneidi jafari, m., & nilipourtabataba'i, s. a., (2017), corporate foresight and its effect on
innovation, strategic decision making and organizational performance (case study:
iranian banking industry). foresight, (just-accepted), 00-00.
35. gutiérrez-garcía, e., & recalde, m., (2016), dialogue for strategic decision-making
processes: an idea model. in the management game of communication (pp. 245-263).
emerald group publishing limited.
36. alkaraan, f., & alkaraan, f., (2016), strategic investment decision-making-scanning and
screening investment opportunities: the expansion of guinness in west africa. meditari
accountancy research, 24 (4).
37. majeed, m. a., majeed, m. a., zhang, x. z., & zhang, x. z., (2016), competitive pressure
and managerial decisions: product market competition and earnings quality in china.
chinese management studies, 10 (3).
38. elbanna, s., andrews, r., & pollanen, r., (2016), strategic planning and implementation
success in public service organizations: evidence from canada. public management
review,1-26.
39. wei, h. l., & wang, e. t., (2010), the strategic value of supply chain visibility: increasing
the ability to reconfigure. european journal of information systems, 19 (2).
40. oswald, s. l., mossholder, k. w., & harris, s. g., (1994), vision salience and strategic
involvement: implications for psychological attachment to organization and job.
strategic management journal, 15 (6).
41. wilson, i., (1992), realizing the power of strategic vision. long range planning, 25 (5).
42. cossette, p., (2001), a systematic method to articulate strategic vision: an illustration
with a small business owner-manager. journal of enterprising culture, 9 (02).
43. den ouden, e., yuan, l., sonnemans, p. j., & brombacher, a. c., (2006), quality and
reliability problems from a consumer's perspective: an increasing problem overlooked
by businesses, quality and reliability engineering international, 22 (7).
44. meeker, w. q., & escoba, l. a., (2004), reliability: the other dimension of quality. quality
technology & quantitative management, 1(1).
45. kazmi, s. a. z., & naaranoja, m., (2015), cultivating strategic thinking in organizational
leaders by designing supportive work environment!. procedia-social and behavioral
sciences, 181, 4.
46. top, m., akdere, m., & tarcan, m., (2015), examining transformational leadership, job
satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust in turkish hospitals:
public servants versus private sector employees. the international journal of human
resource management, 26 (9).
47. abbott, g. n., white, f. a., & charles, m. a., (2005), linking values and organizational
commitment: a correlational and experimental investigation in two organizations.
journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 78(4).
Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, (31/3/2022); Vol. 18, No. 57, Part (3): 136-160
Doi: www.doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.18.57.3.9
48. rosenthal, a., verutes, g., mckenzie, e., arkema, k. k., bhagabati, n., bremer, l. l.,... &
vogl, a. l., (2015), process matters: a framework for conducting decision-relevant
assessments of ecosystem services. international journal of biodiversity science,
ecosystem services & management, 11 (3).
49. younesi, m., & roghanian, e., (2015), a framework for sustainable product design: a
hybrid fuzzy approach based on quality function deployment for environment. journal
of cleaner production, 108.
