Rapid and Efficient Regeneration of Rhododendron decorum from Flower Buds

Abstract

Rhododendron decorum is a woody species with high ornamental and medical value. Herein, we introduce a novel in vitro regeneration method for R. decorum. We used flower buds to develop an efficient and rapid plant regeneration protocol. Sterile flower buds of R. decorum of a 2 cm size were used as explants to study the effects of the culture medium and plant growth regulators on the callus induction and adventitious shoot differentiation, proliferation, and rooting. According to the results, the optimal medium combination for callus induction was WPM + 1 mg/L TDZ + 0.2 mg/L NAA, and its induction rate reached 95.08%. The optimal medium combination for adventitious shoot differentiation from the callus was WPM + 0.5 mg/L TDZ + 0.1 mg/L NAA, and its differentiation rate reached 91.32%. The optimal medium combination for adventitious shoot proliferation was WPM + 2 mg/L ZT + 0.5 mg/L NAA, for which the proliferation rate reached 95.32% and the proliferation coefficient reached 9.45. The optimal medium combination for rooting from adventitious shoots was WPM + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 1 mg/L IBA, and its rooting rate reached 86.90%. The survival rates of the rooted regenerated plantlets exceeded 90% after acclimatization and transplantation. This regeneration system has the advantages of being simple and highly efficient, and it causes little damage to the shoots of the mother plants, laying a foundation for the plantlet propagation, genetic transformation, and new-variety breeding of R. decorum.

Full text

Citation: Wu, H.; Ao, Q.; Li, H.;
Long, F. Rapid and Efficient
Regeneration of Rhododendron
decorum from Flower Buds.
Horticulturae 2023,9, 264.
https://doi.org/10.3390/
horticulturae9020264
Academic Editor: Jean Carlos
Bettoni
Received: 14 January 2023
Revised: 11 February 2023
Accepted: 12 February 2023
Published: 15 February 2023
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
horticulturae
Essay
Rapid and Efficient Regeneration of Rhododendron decorum
from Flower Buds
Hairong Wu, Qian Ao, Huie Li * and Fenfang Long
College of Agriculture, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550000, China
*Correspondence: lihuiesh@126.com
Abstract:
Rhododendron decorum is a woody species with high ornamental and medical value. Herein,
we introduce a novel
in vitro
regeneration method for R. decorum. We used flower buds to develop an
efficient and rapid plant regeneration protocol. Sterile flower buds of R. decorum of a 2 cm size were
used as explants to study the effects of the culture medium and plant growth regulators on the callus
induction and adventitious shoot differentiation, proliferation, and rooting. According to the results,
the optimal medium combination for callus induction was WPM + 1 mg/L
TDZ + 0.2 mg/L NAA
,
and its induction rate reached 95.08%. The optimal medium combination for adventitious shoot
differentiation from the callus was WPM + 0.5 mg/L TDZ + 0.1 mg/L NAA, and its differentiation
rate reached 91.32%. The optimal medium combination for adventitious shoot proliferation was
WPM + 2 mg/L ZT + 0.5 mg/L NAA
, for which the proliferation rate reached 95.32% and the pro-
liferation coefficient reached 9.45. The optimal medium combination for rooting from adventitious
shoots was WPM + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 1 mg/L IBA, and its rooting rate reached 86.90%. The survival
rates of the rooted regenerated plantlets exceeded 90% after acclimatization and transplantation.
This regeneration system has the advantages of being simple and highly efficient, and it causes little
damage to the shoots of the mother plants, laying a foundation for the plantlet propagation, genetic
transformation, and new-variety breeding of R. decorum.
Keywords:
Rhododendron decorum; tissue culture;
in vitro
culture; flower buds; callus induction;
adventitious shoot; regeneration system; plant growth regulators
1. Introduction
Rhododendron decorum Franch. is a woody ornamental plant species that belongs to
the subgenus Hymenanthes of Rhododendron of Ericaceae. It is distributed in southwest
China and northeast Myanmar, and it grows under forests at an altitude of 1000–3700 m.
Its inflorescence is huge, white, and graceful, with fragrance and late flowering, which
make the plant popular. This plant is suited to a cool and humid climate and humus-rich
and slightly acidic soil. It requires sunlight, but it is not resistant to strong sunlight [
1
,
2
].
In addition to its high ornamental value, R. decorum also has high medicinal value, and
its roots, branches, and leaves are all traditional medicinal materials for local people in
China [
3
]. Its corolla is rich in various amino acids, polysaccharides, minor elements, and
other substances, and is a good food resource for locals [
4
–
7
]. In recent years, given the
indiscriminate exploitation of its wild resources, the habitat of R. decorum has been seriously
damaged, and its resources are being increasingly endangered [
8
]. Thus, its propagation
and conservation are urgently needed.
The species of the subgenus Hymenanthes are difficult to propagate by cuttings, and
particularly R. decorum [
9
]. The species of this subgenus are mainly propagated by seeds,
but the seeds are small, the germination rate is low, the seedling growth cycle is long,
and the traits of the seed seedlings are prone to variation [
10
]. Tissue culture technology
can effectively solve these problems. The establishment of a tissue regeneration system
not only provides an efficient technique for the propagation of R. decorum, but it also
Horticulturae 2023,9, 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9020264 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/horticulturae

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 2 of 11
serves as an important prerequisite for genetic transformation and gene function verifi-
cation
studies [11–14]
. Previous studies on R. decorum have mainly focused on genetic
polymorphism [
15
,
16
], medicinal components [
17
,
18
], interspecific hybridization [
19
,
20
],
and mycorrhizal fungi [
21
,
22
]. However, an efficient tissue regeneration system has not
been reported.
Therefore, the effects of the flower bud culture medium and plant growth regulators
on the callus induction and adventitious shoot differentiation, proliferation, and rooting of
R. decorum were studied to provide a basis for its efficient propagation, further research on
breeding, and related genetic studies.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials
The flower buds of R. decorum were collected from a rhododendron nursery in Guizhou
Province, China, on 10 December 2021. The flower buds were soaked in tap water for
2 h
. The outer sepals were removed and rinsed five times for 1 min with tap water, and
the surfaces were dried with tissue paper. Then, the flower buds were sterilized with
75% alcohol (v/v) for 1 min, washed with sterile water five times, sterilized with 5%
sodium hypochlorite (v/v) for 10 min and/or 0.1% mercuric chloride (v/v) for 10–30 min
to compare the efficiency of the sterilization, and finally rinsed five times for 1 min with
sterile distilled water. All the remaining sepals were finally removed. The white 2 cm sized
sterile flower buds in the medium for tissue culture and their contamination and survival
rates were observed after 2 weeks and were determined using the following equation:
contamination rate (%) = number of flower buds contaminated/total number of flower
buds
×
100%; survival rate (%) = number of flower buds that survived/total number of
flower buds ×100%.
2.2. Culture Medium and Conditions
The uniform flower bud explants were cultured vertically on the media. The culture
media included Murashige and Skoog (MS) [
23
], Woody Plant Medium (WPM) [
24
], and
Driver and Kuniyuki Walnut (DKW) [
25
]. Agar as the gelling agent (7 g/L) and sucrose
(30 g/L) were added to each medium, and 15 g/L of sucrose was added to the rooting
culture. The pH values of the media were adjusted to 5.8 with 1 N NaOH or 1 N HCl,
and the media were autoclaved at 121
◦
C for 20 min. The callus induction culture was
incubated in artificial climate chambers without light at 25
±
1
◦
C, and the other cultures
were incubated in artificial climate chambers under a 12 h light cycle with a light intensity
of 20–30
µ
mol
·
m
−2·
s
−1
at 25
±
1
◦
C. All chemicals and reagents used in this study were
purchased from Solarbio Company, Beijing, China.
2.3. Callus Induction
The flower buds were placed on the basal media MS, WPM, and DKW in the dark for
the selection of the suitable basal medium for callus induction. Then, after 2 weeks, the
flower buds were placed on a basal WPM containing different combinations of thidiazuron
(TDZ) (0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/L) and naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) (0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 mg/L)
in the dark for the screening of the best suitable combination of plant growth regulators
for callus induction. All induction rates were determined after 30 days of the culture of
the flower buds with the following equation: callus induction rate (%) = induction of the
number of flower buds from the callus/total number of flower buds ×100%.
2.4. Shoot Induction
Calluses were transferred to a WPM containing different plant growth regulator
combinations of TDZ (0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/L) and NAA (0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 mg/L) under
light conditions for adventitious shoot induction. All induction rates were determined
after 30 days of the culture of the calluses with the following equation: induction rate of

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 3 of 11
adventitious shoots (%) = number of callus-induced adventitious shoots/total number of
calluses ×100%.
2.5. Shoot Proliferation
Adventitious shoots up to 1 cm high with two intact leaves were defined as effective
shoots. They were transferred to the WPM containing different combinations of zeatin (ZT)
(1, 2, and 3 mg/L) and NAA (0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 mg/L) for shoot proliferation. All induction
rates were determined after 30 days of culture of the shoots with the following equation:
adventitious shoot proliferation rate (%) = number of shoot-induced effective shoots/total
number of shoots
×
100%; proliferation coefficient = number of proliferating shoots/total
number of shoots.
2.6. Cytological Observation
The cytological changes during callus induction, callus proliferation, and the differen-
tiation of complete adventitious shoots were observed on paraffin sections prepared every
20 days of culture. The shoots were initially fixed in FAA solution (formalin, acetic acid,
and 70% ethanol in a 1:1:13 ratio) for 24 h, dehydrated in the tertiary butyl alcohol series,
and embedded in liquid paraffin [
26
]. The transverse sections of a 5–10
µ
m thickness were
sliced using a rotary microtome (Erma, Yoshikawa, Japan). The sections were stained with
1% (w/v) safranin and mounted in glycerin. The specimens were microphotographed with
a Leica DM 750 LED microscope, as described.
2.7. Rooting and Acclimatization
After the adventitious shoot proliferation culture, adventitious shoots of approximately
2 cm in height were cultured vertically on a WPM for rooting. Effective shoots were
transferred to WPM medium combinations of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) (0.5 and 1 mg/L)
and NAA (0.1 and 0.5 mg/L) for rooting. The rooting status was recorded after 30 days.
Regenerated plantlets with six fully developed leaves were transferred from an artificial
climate and incubated under natural light for 5–7 days. The tissue culture bottles were
opened for 2 days for the refinement of the seedlings. Plantlets were transferred to pots
containing a sterilized substrate (vermiculite:peat soil = 3:1) at 121
◦
C for 1 h, and then
covered with polyethylene film. Water was sprayed daily to create saturated conditions
of relative humidity. The plantlets remained in a growth room at 24
±
1
◦
C under a
16 h light cycle at a 35
µ
mol
·
m
−2·
s
−1
photosynthetic photon flux density, provided by
fluorescent lamps. After 4 weeks of acclimatization, the survival rate of the regenerated
plantlets was determined using the following equation: rooting rate (%) = number of
rooting shoots/numbers of transplanted shoots
×
100%; survival rate (%) = number of
surviving regenerated plants/total number of transplanted regenerated plants ×100%.
2.8. Statistical Analysis of Data
In the regeneration experiments, one flower bud was cultured on the medium of each
bottle, and 20 flower buds were cultured for each experiment with three replicates. The
results are presented as means
±
standard errors (SEs). The mean and SE values were
assessed using Microsoft Excel 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics v26 (Armonk, NY, USA) was used
for the variance analyses. The significance of the differences among the mean values was
assessed using Duncan’s multiple range test at p
≤
0.05. The results are presented as the
mean ±SE of three replicates.
3. Results
3.1. Sterilization of Flower Buds
The results of the different combinations of sterilization methods showed that sodium
hypochlorite (5%) or mercury chloride (0.1%) resulted in a high rate of contamination
and the low survival rate of the explants, whereas the combination of sodium hypochlo-
rite and mercury chloride resulted in a lower rate of contamination than that of sodium

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 4 of 11
hypochlorite and mercury chloride alone (Table 1). The sterilization combination of 5%
sodium hypochlorite for 10 min followed by 0.1% mercury chloride for 30 min yielded
the best result.
Table 1. Effects of different sterilization methods on explants.
Sodium Hypochlorite
(min)
Mercury Chloride
(min)
Contamination Rate
(%)
Survival Rate
(%)
10 0 100.00 ±0.00 a 0.00 ±0.00 g
0 10 65.84 ±2.84 b 34.16 ±1.54 f
0 20 46.12 ±3.03 c 53.88 ±2.08 e
0 30 34.67 ±4.04 d 65.33 ±3.48 d
10 10 16.63 ±1.42 e 83.37 ±2.02 c
10 20 5.72 ±1.81 f 94.28 ±0.69 b
10 30 0.00 ±0.00 g 100.00 ±0.00 a
Different letters in same column are significantly different at p< 0.05 (DMRT).
3.2. Effects of Different Media on Callus Induction
Calluses could be induced and grew well in the flower buds on the WPM, DKW, and
MS media without plant growth regulators, but the induction rate varied significantly
(Table 2). Two weeks after the flower buds were cultured in the different basal media, the
bases of the flower buds began to swell and produce white calluses. No differences in the
sizes or colors of the calluses were observed. The induction rates in the WPM and DKW
media were significantly higher than the induction rate in the MS medium, and the WPM
medium had the highest induction rate at 93.97%.
Table 2. Effects of basal media on callus induction rate of R. decorum flower buds.
Medium Induction Rate (%)
WPM 93.97 ±1.51 a
DKW 85.72 ±3.31 b
MS 65.25 ±1.93 c
Different letters in same column are significantly different at p< 0.05 (DMRT).
3.3. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Callus Induction
TDZ and NAA were used to induce the R. decorum calluses, and the induction effects
are shown in Table 3. After the callus induction in the medium supplemented with plant
growth regulators for 2 weeks in the dark, the flower bud bases expanded and produced
white and soft calluses. The best callus induction combination was WPM + 1 mg/L
TDZ + 0.2 mg/L NAA
, and the induction rate was 95.08%. The induction rate increased
with the TDZ and NAA concentrations, but the rate decreased when the concentration
exceeded the optimal concentration (1 mg/L TDZ and 0.2 mg/L NAA).
Table 3. Effects of TDZ and NAA on callus induction.
TDZ (mg/L) NAA (mg/L) Induction Rate (%)
0.1 0.1 36.67 ±1.53 f
0.1 0.2 51.02 ±5.29 e
0.1 0.5 54.66 ±3.51 e
0.5 0.1 65.73 ±1.52 d
0.5 0.2 72.33 ±3.79 c
0.5 0.5 78.67 ±0.58 c
1 0.1 85.66 ±2.08 b
1 0.2 95.08 ±1.02 a
1 0.5 78.45 ±5.13 c
Different letters in same column are significantly different at p< 0.05 (DMRT).

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 5 of 11
3.4. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Adventitious Shoot Induction
The calluses began to differentiate adventitious shoots by culture on the shoot induc-
tion media after 2 weeks (Table 4). The best induction rate was 91.32% on the medium
combination WPM + 0.5 mg/L TDZ + 0.1 mg/L NAA. The induction rate initially increased,
and it then decreased with the increasing TDZ concentrations. In addition, when the TDZ
concentration was low, a high concentration of NAA improved the induction rate of the
adventitious shoots, and when the concentration of TDZ was high, a low concentration of
NAA was more suitable for the adventitious shoot induction. Although the concentration
of the growth regulator exceeded the optimal value, the growth rate of the adventitious
shoots decreased with their increasing induction rate, but the adventitious shoot leaves
were bright green and healthy. When cultured under a light environment, most of the
calluses differentiated into adventitious shoots, and a few calluses did not, which exhibited
browning and eventually died (Figure 1).
Table 4. Effects of TDZ and NAA on adventitious shoot induction.
TDZ (mg/L) NAA (mg/L) Induction Rate (%)
0.1 0.1 46.05 ±2.45 f
0.1 0.2 61.21 ±4.35 d
0.1 0.5 74.00 ±2.36 c
0.5 0.1 91.32 ±2.36 a
0.5 0.2 84.02 ±1.56 b
0.5 0.5 73.07 ±4.36 c
1 0.1 58.33 ±0.57 d
1 0.2 55.53 ±0.88 d
1 0.5 51.45 ±2.03 e
Different letters in same column are significantly different at p< 0.05 (DMRT).
Figure 1.
Adventitious shoots induced within 30 days: (
a
) adventitious shoots of callus differentiation;
(b) browning callus. Bars = 1.0 cm.
3.5. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Adventitious Shoot Proliferation
After 1 week of culture, adventitious shoots began to proliferate. Low and high concen-
trations of NAA and ZT produced adventitious shoots with low proliferation coefficients
and weak growth shoots with abnormal leaves (Figure 2). The combination of 0.5 mg/L
NAA and 2 mg/L ZT resulted in the best adventitious shoot proliferation rate of 95.32%
and a proliferation coefficient of 9.42 (Table 5). The shoot leaves were fresh green, the
shoot stems were strong, and the growth rate was fast. The deformed adventitious shoots
produced by proliferation had a slow growth rate and death during the culture process.

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 6 of 11
Figure 2.
Adventitious shoot proliferation of calluses on different medium combinations:
(a) adventitious
shoots with high proliferation coefficient containing green and normal leaves or
(d) hyperhydric
; (
b
) adventitious shoots with low proliferation coefficient containing green normal
leaves or (c) yellow-green and abnormal leaves. Scale bars = 1.0 cm.
Table 5. Effects of NAA and ZT on adventitious shoot proliferation.
NAA
(mg/L)
ZT
(mg/L)
Proliferation
Rate (%)
Proliferation
Coefficient Growth Status
0.1 1 66.34 ±3.06 d 4.67 ±0.47 f Leaves were green and healthy,
shoots were small
0.2 1 74.03 ±3.12 c 5.57 ±0.15 e Leaves were green and healthy,
shoots were small
0.5 1 76.67 ±3.21 c 7.47 ±0.36 c Leaves were green and healthy,
shoots were stout
0.1 2 81.47 ±6.51 b 8.67 ±0.11 a Leaves were green and healthy,
shoots were stout
0.2 2 88.76 ±4.51 a 8.97 ±0.44 a Leaves were green and healthy,
shoots were stout
0.5 2 95.32 ±2.56 a 9.42 ±0.27 b Leaves were green and healthy,
shoots were stout
0.1 3 89.32 ±4.14 a 4.21 ±0.31 b Leaves were yellow-green and
small, with a few abnormal leaves
0.2 3 84.34 ±2.65 b 2.64 ±0.09 c
Leaves were yellow-green and
hyperhydric, with many abnormal
leaves
0.5 3 74.43 ±2.52 c 1.95 ±0.21 e
Leaves were yellow-green and
hyperhydric, with many abnormal
leaves
Different letters in same column are significantly different at p< 0.05 (DMRT).
3.6. Cytological Observation of Shoot Regeneration
Cytological observation at three stages of the adventitious shoot formation from the
calluses showed that white and fluffy calluses formed at the bases of the shoots after
20 days
of culture (Figure 3a,d). The cells divided rapidly and were closely arranged. After 40 days
of culture, the proliferation of the calluses was completed, and the cells continued to divide
and expand (Figure 3b,e). After 60 days of culture, adventitious shoots differentiated from
the calluses, which are clearly shown on the paraffin section (Figure 3c,f), suggesting that
the shoot regeneration from the calluses was indirect.

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 7 of 11
Figure 3.
Observation on paraffin section of shoot regeneration of R. decorum: (
a
) white fluffy callus;
(
b
) proliferation of fluffy calluses; (
c
) differentiation of adventitious shoots from calluses; (
d
) arrow
shows cells that divided rapidly after 20 days of culture; (
e
) arrow shows cells that divided and
expanded after 40 days of culture; (
f
) arrow shows adventitious shoots that differentiated from callus
after 60 days of culture. Bars = 100 µm.
3.7. Rooting and Acclimatization
The adventitious shoots were rooted in a medium containing NAA and IBA. The
results are shown in Table 6. Adventitious roots were induced after 30 days of culture
(Figure 4). The best medium combination for rooting was WPM + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 1 mg/L
IBA, with a rooting rate of 86.9%. A high concentration of IBA and low concentration of
NAA induced healthy adventitious roots, the rooting speed was fast, and no calluses ap-
peared at the bases of the adventitious shoots (Figure 4a,b). However, a high concentration
of NAA induced slow rooting with fewer roots and a large number of calluses at the base.
In addition, after 30 days of transplantation, the survival rates of the rooted plantlets were
higher than 90%, and the plantlets were in good growth condition (Figure 4c,d).
Table 6. Effects of NAA and IBA on adventitious shoot rooting.
NAA (mg/L) IBA (mg/L) Rooting Rate (%)
0.1 0.5 59.33 ±4.09 b
0.1 1 86.90 ±2.97 a
0.5 0.5 21.53 ±2.49 d
0.5 1 42.67 ±2.84 c
Different letters in same column are significantly different at p< 0.05 (DMRT).
Figure 4.
Roots and acclimatization of rooted plantlets: (
a
) roots in WPM medium after 30 days of culture;
(b) rooted plantlets; (c,d) acclimatized plantlets from ex vitro rooting after 30 days. Bars = 1.0 cm.

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 8 of 11
4. Discussion
There are 8–10 small flower buds in the racemes of R. decorum before blossom. Hence,
its buds can be used as explants for developing tissue culture systems. Wang et al. [
27
]
reported that the performance of a tissue culture using the flower buds of Rhododendron
hybrids cn.’Dr. Tjebbe’ as explants had a low contamination rate and high induction rate.
The use of flower buds as explants neither harms the mother plant nor causes mutation
because small flower buds are wrapped in sepals, which are easy to sterilize and do not
easily brown [
28
]. These features may be the reasons that the survival rates of the flower
buds subjected to sterilization treatment reached 100% in this study.
In the process of tissue culture, the basal medium is the main source of the nutrients
required by the explants, and the appropriate basal medium type is essential for the rapid
and healthy growth and development of explants from different plant species [
29
–
31
].
Different parts of the same genotype can have different growth responses to a certain basal
medium [
32
–
34
]. Therefore, the screening of the basal medium is beneficial to the smooth
progress of the tissue culture. For example, in the rapid propagation of Vaccinium ashei
Reade, which is a species belonging to Ericaceae, the basal medium DKW is more suitable
for the rapid propagation culture of the stem segments than WPM or MS [
35
]. By contrast,
in the present study, WPM was the most suitable basal medium for culturing the flower
buds of R. decorum, which is a species that belongs to the same family, followed by DKW
and MS. This difference may be caused by the low nitrogen demand of R. decorum. WPM,
with a low nitrogen content, met this demand [
36
,
37
], whereas the DKW and MS media,
with relatively high contents of nitrogen, did not [38].
Plant growth regulators are minor natural compounds that are produced in plant
metabolism, and they regulate the growth and development processes of plants [
39
,
40
].
In tissue culture, plant growth regulators play a key regulatory role in the formation
of calluses and the induction and proliferation of adventitious shoots. This effect is af-
fected by the concentration and type of growth regulator, as well as by the interaction
between growth regulators. A reasonable ratio of growth regulators is especially crucial for
the induction and proliferation of adventitious shoots; thus, the formulas of the growth
regulators in tissue culture systems vary among [
41
,
42
]. In the tissue culture process
of woody plants, the commonly used plant growth regulators are TDZ, NAA, IBA, and
kinetin [
43
,
44
]. However, different species have different degrees of sensitivity to plant
growth regulators. TDZ is currently considered to be one of the most active cytokinins,
with good induction effects on calluses and adventitious shoots, and it is widely used in
the regeneration processes of R. calophytum [
45
], R. delavayi [
46
], and Rhododendron ‘Fra-
grantissimum Improved’ [
47
]. Similarly, in the present study, the plant growth regulator
combination
0.2 mg/L NAA + 0.5 mg/L TDZ
was the most suitable for the induction of
the adventitious shoots of the flower buds of R. decorum, and the adventitious shoots grew
rapidly and healthily.
Proliferation culture is an indispensable step in the process of tissue culture, and the
proliferation coefficient can reflect the speed and efficiency of the propagation
in vitro
and
is an important index for estimating the total production of plantlets. Previous studies have
shown that ZT is the most ideal exogenous hormone to induce differentiation and prolifer-
ation during the tissue culture process of Rhododendron [
48
]. When the ZT concentration
was extremely high, the adventitious shoot proliferation rate and proliferation coefficient
were also increased, but the adventitious shoots were prone to elongation, thinness, and
deformity, and they were hyperhydric [49].
Rooting induction is another important step in the establishment of a rapid propa-
gation system
in vitro
. IBA and NAA are commonly used for the rooting induction of
Rhododendrons species plantlets, which have a high rooting rate and multiple and strong
roots, as well as a high survival rate after transplantation. For example, Elmongy et al. [
50
]
found that 2 mg/L of IBA was suitable for the rooting of two azalea cultivars: ‘Mingchao’
and ‘Zihudie’. Almeida found that 1 mg/L of IBA + 2 mg/L of NAA was suitable for
the rooting of R. ponticum [
51
]. In this study, NAA and IBA were found to be suitable

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 9 of 11
for inducing the rooting of R. decorum adventitious shoots. The results showed that high
concentrations of NAA resulted in slow rooting and weak roots, whereas high concentra-
tions of IBA were conducive to the induction of root development and root health. A high
concentration of IBA was conducive to the induction of root development, and the root
system was developed and strong. The root systems of the regenerated plants were thick,
and the survival rate of transplantation was high.
Tissue culture involves the induction, proliferation, rooting, and transplanting of plant
materials within a sterile and controlled environment. In this study, the flower buds of
R. decorum were used for regeneration. The protocol was as follows: (1) the induction
of calluses using sterilized flower buds in WPM + 1 mg/L TDZ + 0.2 mg/L NAA in the
dark; (2) the induction of adventitious shoots using fluffy calluses in WPM + 0.5 mg/L
TDZ + 0.1 mg/L NAA
under a 12 h light cycle; (3) the proliferation of adventitious shoots
using shoots up to 1 cm in WPM + 2 mg/L ZT + 0.5 mg/L NAA under a 12 h light
cycle; (4) the rooting of adventitious shoots using shoots up to 2 cm in WPM + 0.1 mg/L
NAA + 1 mg/L
IBA under a 12 h light cycle; (5) the transplanting of the rooted plantlets
after acclimation under a 16 h light cycle.
5. Conclusions
This study established an
in vitro
propagation system for R. decorum through indirect
organogenesis using its flower buds as explants by screening the influencing factors, such
as different sterilization method, basal medium, and plant growth regulator combinations.
Tissue culture using flower buds as explants has the advantages of thorough sterilization,
efficient and rapid regeneration, and it causes little damage to the mother plants. This
regeneration system is simple and highly efficient, and it lays a foundation for the plantlet
propagation, genetic transformation, and new-variety breeding of R. decorum.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, H.W. and F.L.; methodology, H.W.; validation, Q.A.;
formal analysis, H.W., Q.A. and F.L.; investigation, H.W., Q.A., H.L. and F.L.; data curation, H.W.
and H.L.; writing, H.W., H.L., Q.A. and H.L.; visualization, Q.A. and H.L.; supervision, H.L.; project
administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published
version of the manuscript.
Funding:
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32260415).
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Flora of China Editorial Committee; Chinese Academy of Sciences. Flora of China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1994; pp. 16–17.
2. Min, T.L. A revision of subgenus Hymenanthes (Rhododendron L.) in Yunnan and Xizang. Plant Divers. 1984,6, 1.
3.
Wang, B.; Zhou, L.Y.; Xia, H.M. Impacts of sucrose, boric acid and Ca+ on pollen germination of Rhododendron decorum Franch.
Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2021,49, 129–133.
4.
Zhu, Y.-X.; Zhang, Z.-X.; Yan, H.-M.; Lu, D.; Zhang, H.-P.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.-B.; Li, Y. Antinociceptive Diterpenoids from the Leaves
and Twigs of Rhododendron decorum.J. Nat. Prod. 2018,81, 1183–1192. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
Rateb, M.E.; Hassan, H.; Arafa, E.-S.; Jaspars, M.; Ebel, R. Decorosides A and B, Cytotoxic Flavonoid Glycosides from the Leaves
of Rhododendron decorum.Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014,9, 473–476. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6.
Zhu, Y.-X.; Zhang, Z.-X.; Zhang, H.-P.; Chai, L.-S.; Li, L.; Ma, S.-G.; Li, Y. A new ascorbic acid derivative and two new terpenoids
from the leaves and twigs of Rhododendron decorum.J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2019,21, 579–586. [CrossRef]
7.
Shi, Y.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, X. Poisonous delicacy: Market-oriented surveys of the consumption of Rhododendron
flowers in Yunnan, China. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021,265, 113320. [CrossRef]
8.
Zhang, S.; Dang, Z.; Zhang, L.Y. Research on seeds aseptic germination and seedling growth condition of Rhododendron decorum
Franch. North. Hortic. 2014,305, 77–80. (In Chinese with English Abstract)
9.
Lin, L.-C.; Wang, C.-S. Influence of Light Intensity and Photoperiod on the Seed Germination of Four Rhododendron Species in
Taiwan. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2017,20, 253–259. [CrossRef]
10.
Giri, C.C.; Shyamkumar, B.; Anjaneyulu, C. Progress in tissue culture, genetic transformation and applications of biotechnology
to trees: An overview. Trees 2003,18, 115–135. [CrossRef]

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 10 of 11
11.
Yavuz, D.Ö. Optimization of Regeneration Conditions and In Vitro Propagation of Sideritis Stricta Boiss & Heldr. Int. J. Biol.
Macromol. 2016,90, 59–62. [CrossRef]
12.
Nada, S.; Chennareddy, S.; Goldman, S.; Rudrabhatla, S.; Potlakayala, S.D.; Josekutty, P.; Deepkamal, K. Direct Shoot Bud
Differentiation and Plantlet Regeneration from Leaf and Petiole Explants of Begonia tuberhybrida. Hortscience
2011
,46, 759–764.
[CrossRef]
13.
Zhang, H.P.; Wang, H.B.; Wang, L.Q.; Bao, G.H.; Qin, G.W. A new 1,5-seco grayanotoxane from Rhododendron decorum.J. Asian
Nat. Prod. Res. 2005,7, 87–90. [CrossRef]
14.
Long, Y.; Yang, Y.; Pan, G.; Shen, Y. New Insights Into Tissue Culture Plant-Regeneration Mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci.
2022
,13,
926752. [CrossRef]
15.
Xue, Q.W.; Yuan, H.; Chun, L.L. Assessing the genetic consequences of flower-harvesting in Rhododendron decorum Franchet
(Ericaceae) using microsatellite markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2013,50, 296–303.
16.
Wang, X.-Q.; Huang, Y.; Long, C.-L. Isolation and Characterization of Twenty-four Microsatellite Loci for Rhododendron decorum
Franch. (Ericaceae). Hortscience 2009,44, 2028–2030. [CrossRef]
17.
Jin, H.Z.; Chen, G.; Li, X.F.; Shen, Y.H.; Yan, S.K.; Zhang, L.; Yang, M.; Zhang, W.D. Flavonoids from Rhododendron decorum.Chem.
Nat. Compd. 2009,45, 85–86. [CrossRef]
18.
Zhang, W.; Jin, H.; Chen, G.; Li, X.; Yan, S.; Zhang, L.; Shen, Y.; Yang, M. A new grandame diterpenoid from Rhododendron decorum.
Fitoterapia 2008,79, 602–604. [CrossRef]
19.
Zha, H.-G.; Milne, R.I.; Sun, H. Morphological and molecular evidence of natural hybridization between two distantly related
Rhododendron species from the Sino-Himalaya. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2008,156, 119–129. [CrossRef]
20.
Li, Q.; Li, H.E.; Yang, L.; Guo, Q.; Fu, Y.; Huang, J. Asymmetric hybridization origin of Rhododendron ageratum (Ericaceae) in
Guizhou, China. Phytotaxa 2021,510, 197–212. [CrossRef]
21.
Sun, L.; Pei, K.; Wang, F.; Ding, Q.; Bing, Y.; Gao, B.; Zheng, Y.; Liang, Y.; Ma, K. Different distribution patterns between putative ercoid
mycorrhizal and other fungal as-semblages in roots of Rhododendron decorum in the Southwest of China. PLoS ONE 2018,7, e49867.
22.
Tian, W.; Zhang, C.; Qiao, P.; Milne, R. Diversity of culturable ericoid mycorrhizal fungi of Rhododendron decorum in Yunnan,
China. Mycologia 2011,103, 703–709. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23.
Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant.
1962
,
15, 473–497. [CrossRef]
24.
McCown, B.H. Woody Plant Medium (WPM)-a mineral nutrient formulation for microculture for woody plant species. Hortscience
1981,16, 453.
25. Driver, J.A.; Kuniyuki, A.H. In Vitro Propagation of Paradox Walnut Rootstock. Hortscience 1984,19, 507–509. [CrossRef]
26.
Zaytseva, Y.G.; Poluboyarova, T.V.; Novikova, T.I. Effects of thiazine on
in vitro
morphogenic response of Rhododendron sichotense
Pojark. and Rhododendron catawbiense cv. Grandiflorum leaf explants. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2016,52, 56–63. [CrossRef]
27.
Wang, W.Q.; Xiao, J.Z.; Li, Z.M.; Hu, J.; Bai, X. Study on the bud tissue culture and establishment of optimization system of
Rhododendron.J. Hebei Norm. Univ. Sci. Technol. 2012,26, 17–22. (In Chinese with English Abstract)
28.
Tomsone, S.; Gertnere, D.
In vitro
Shoot Regeneration from Flower and Leaf Explants in Rhododendron.Biol. Plant.
2003
,46,
463–465. [CrossRef]
29.
Nobuaki, M.; Shinsaku, T. Effects of medium components and shear conditions on the formation and growth of adventitious bud
derived from hairy roots of Atropa belladonna L. Environ. Control Biol. 2012,50, 393–406.
30. Debnath, S.C. Propagation of Vaccinium in vitro: A review. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2007,6, 47–71. [CrossRef]
31.
Mohammed, A.; Chiruvella, K.K.; Namsa, N.D.; Ghanta, R.G. An efficient
in vitro
shoot regeneration from leaf petiolar explants
and ex vitro rooting of Bixa orellana L.—A dye yielding plant. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2015,21, 417–424. [CrossRef]
32.
Tanmayee, M.; Arvind, G.; Arnab, S. Somatic embryogenesis and genetic fidelity study of micropropagated medicinal species,
Canna indica.Horticulture 2015,1, 3–13.
33.
Nowakowska, K.; Pi ´nkowska, A.; Siedlecka, E.; Pacholczak, A. The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, biochemical
changes and genetic stability of Rhododendron ‘Kazimierz Odnowiciel’ in the
in vitro
cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. PCTOC
2022,149, 675–684. [CrossRef]
34.
Blazich, F.A.; Giles, C.G.; Haemmerle, C.M. Micropropagation of Rhododendron chapmani.J. Environ. Hortic.
1986
,4, 26–29.
[CrossRef]
35.
Komakech, R.; Kim, Y.-G.; Kim, W.J.; Omujal, F.; Yang, S.; Moon, B.C.; Okello, D.; Rahmat, E.; Kyeyune, G.N.; Matsabisa, M.G.;
et al. A Micropropagation Protocol for the Endangered Medicinal Tree Prunus africana (Hook f.) Kalkman: Genetic Fidelity and
Physiological Parameter Assessment. Front. Plant Sci. 2020,11, 548003. [CrossRef]
36.
Zhou, J.; Liu, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yang, G.; Xu, Z. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on the Rapid Propagation
System of Broussonetia papyrifera L. Vent Explants. Forests 2021,12, 874. [CrossRef]
37.
Bell, R.L.; Srinivasan, C.; Lomberk, D. Effect of nutrient media on axillary shoot proliferation and preconditioning for adven-titious
shoot regeneration of pears. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2009,45, 708–721. [CrossRef]
38.
Tang, Q.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, G.; Sun, H.; Wang, W.; Shen, X. An optimized protocol for indirect organogenesis from
root explants of Agapanthus praecox subsp. orientalis ‘Big Blue’. Horticulture 2022,8, 715. [CrossRef]
39.
Poothong, S.; Reed, B.M. Modeling the effects of mineral nutrition for improving growth and development of micro propagated
red raspberries. Sci. Hortic. 2014,165, 132–141. [CrossRef]

Horticulturae 2023,9, 264 11 of 11
40.
Carlín, A.P.; Tafoya, F.; Alpuche-Solis, A.; Pérez-Molphe-Balch, E. Effects of different culture media and conditions on biomass
production of hairy root cultures in six Mexican cactus species. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2015,51, 332–339. [CrossRef]
41.
Nic-Can, G.I.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. The role of the auxins during somatic embryogenesis. In Somatic Embryogenesis: Fundamental
Aspects and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 171–182.
42.
Debnath, S.C.; McRae, K.B. An efficient adventitious shoot regeneration system on excised leaves of micro propagated lin-gonberry
(Vaccinium vitisidaea L.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2002,77, 744–752. [CrossRef]
43.
Zheng, M.; Yang, H.; Yang, E.; Zou, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J. Efficient
in vitro
shoot bud proliferation from cotyledonary nodes and
apical buds of Moringa oleifera Lam. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022,187, 115394. [CrossRef]
44.
Ahmad, Z.; Yadav, V.; Shahzad, A.; Emamverdian, A.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Ding, Y. Micropropagation, encapsulation, physiological,
and genetic homogeneity assessment in Casuarina equisetifolia.Front. Plant Sci. 2022,13, 905444. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45.
Coste, A.; Vlase, L.; Halmagyi, A.; Deliu, C.; Coldea, G. Effects of plant growth regulators and elicitors on production of secondary
metabolites in shoot cultures of Hypericum hirsutum and Hypericum maculatum.Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. PCTOC
2011
,106,
279–288. [CrossRef]
46.
Luo, L.; Bai, J.; Chen, C.; Chen, X.; Chen, K.; Chen, F. Study on plantlet regeneration for blade segments and the physiological
trait for heat tolerance in the callus of Rhododendron calophytum.J. Bot. Northwest China
2014
.34, 1377–1382. (In Chinese with
English Abstract)
47. Tian, G.; Peng, L.C.; Qu, S.P.; Wang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Li, S.; Jie, W.; Guan, W. Studies on the adventitious bud induction from in vitro
leaves of Rhododendron delavayi var. delavayi and sociological observation on the bud formation. J. Hortic.
2020
,47, 2019–2026. (In
Chinese with English Abstract)
48.
Hebert, C.J.; Touchell, D.H.; Ranney, T.G.; LeBude, A.V.
In vitro
shoot regeneration and polyploid induction of Rhododendron
‘Fra-grantissimum Improved’. Hortic. Sci. 2010,45, 801–804.
49.
Wei, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.
In vitro
shoot culture of Rhododendron fortunei: An important plant for bioactive phytochem-
icals. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018,126, 459–465. [CrossRef]
50.
Elmongy, M.S.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Xia, Y. Root development enhanced by using indole-3-butyric acid and naphthalene acetic acid
and associated biochemical changes of in vitro Azalea micro shoots. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018,37, 813–825. [CrossRef]
51.
Almeida, R.; Gonçalves, S.; Romano, A.
In vitro
micropropagation of endangered Rhododendron ponticum L. subsp. baeticum
(Boissier & Reuter) Handel-Mazzetti. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005,14, 1059–1069. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.