A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Current Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Current Psychology (2024) 43:811–826
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04384-9
Irrelevant angry, butnothappy, faces facilitate response inhibition
inmindfulness meditators
SurabhiLodha1· RashmiGupta1
Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published online: 13 February 2023
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023
Abstract
Mindfulness enhances executive control and regulates emotion, but the role of mindfulness in response inhibition in emo-
tional contexts remains unclear. The present study used a stop-signal task to investigate the interactive effect of mindfulness,
response inhibition, and emotions. Individuals with prior experience in mindfulness meditation and no meditation experience
participated in the study. In the stop-signal task, participants responded to the target stimulus using keypress on go trials and
inhibited the response on stop trials. On each trial, an emotional face (prime; angry, happy, or neutral) preceded the target
stimulus, but they were instructed to ignore the face. After the task, participants filled out self-report scales associated with
attention and awareness, affect, mood, and impulsivity. No group differences were found on any self-report measure. The
task results showed that happy face primes enhanced response inhibition in non-meditators, whereas angry face primes
enhanced response inhibition in mindfulness meditators. The results are explained through functional perspectives of how
mindfulness influences attentional resource deployment to emotional stimuli, affecting response processes over time. The
study demonstrates the existence of emotional asymmetry in the inhibitory process arising from mindfulness practice. The
findings contribute to understanding the temporally dynamic patterns through which mindfulness modulates the attention-
emotion interface to promote meaning in the face of difficulty.
Introduction
Attention is vital in prioritizing and focusing on the cur-
rent task goals but is often biased towards emotional stim-
uli. Emotional stimuli are salient and attention-grabbing;
emotional information often captures our attention and
distracts us from the primary task, commonlytermed emo-
tional interference (Gupta etal., 2016; Gupta & Deák,
2015; Okon-Singer etal., 2007). Despite our attentional
bias toward emotional information, we might be able to
ignore emotional distractions. Usually, a succession of
control processes collectively called cognitive control
(Cohen, 2017; Gratton etal., 2018; Gupta etal., 2011;
Miller, 2007) shifts the attention to the main task. For
example, when attentional resources are consumed by a
difficult task (Gupta, 2011, 2012, 2016; Gupta etal., 2019;
Okon-Singer etal., 2007) or when distractors frequently
occur (Grimshaw etal., 2018).
According to the seminal model of attention (Posner
& Petersen, 1990), it consists of an executive control
network, which is involved in high-order information
processing and guides the response-level decision-mak-
ing (Corbetta & Shulman, 2002). The executive control
network is associated with resolving conflicts between
competing tasks and planning the execution of correct
responses. The response inhibition component of the
executive control network (Miyake etal., 2000) inhibits
prepotent responses and suppresses irrelevant informa-
tion, thought, or action, which is considered essential for
adaptive everyday functioning (Gupta & Srinivasan, 2009;
Van Veen & Carter, 2006; Verbruggen & Logan, 2008).
Impairments in response inhibition have been implicated
in various psychopathological conditions like attention-
deficit hyperactivity disorder (Alvarez & Emory, 2006;
Gupta & Kar, 2010; Gupta etal., 2006, 2011; Verbruggen
& Logan, 2008; Walcott & Landau, 2004) and depression
(Gotlib & Joormann, 2010; Gupta, 2007).
* Rashmi Gupta
rash_cogsci@yahoo.com
1 Cognitive andBehavioural Neuroscience Laboratory,
Department ofHumanities andSocial Sciences, Indian
Institute ofTechnology Bombay, First Floor, Mumbai,
Maharashtra400076, India
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.