ArticlePDF Available

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older - United States, 2023

Authors:

Abstract

At its October 2022 meeting, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices* (ACIP) approved the Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule for Ages 19 Years or Older, United States, 2023. The 2023 adult immunization schedule summarizes ACIP recommendations, including several changes to the cover page, tables, notes, and appendix from the 2022 immunization schedule.† This schedule can be found on the CDC immunization schedule website (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules). Health care providers are advised to use the cover page, tables, notes, and appendix together to determine recommended vaccinations for patient populations. This adult immunization schedule is recommended by ACIP (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip) and approved by CDC (https://www.cdc.gov), the American College of Physicians (https://www.acponline.org), the American Academy of Family Physicians (https://www.aafp.org), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (https://www.acog.org), the American College of Nurse-Midwives (https://www.midwife.org), the American Academy of Physician Associates (https://www.aapa.org), the American Pharmacists Association (https://www.pharmacist.com), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (https://shea-online.org).
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / February 10, 2023 / Vol. 72 / No. 6 141
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization
Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older — United States, 2023
Neil Murthy, MD1; A. Patricia Wodi, MD1; Veronica McNally, JD2; Sybil Cineas, MD3; Kevin Ault, MD4
At its October 2022 meeting, the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices* (ACIP) approved the Recommended
Adult Immunization Schedule for Ages 19 Years or Older,
United States, 2023. The 2023 adult immunization schedule
summarizes ACIP recommendations, including several changes
to the cover page, tables, notes, and appendix from the 2022
immunization schedule. This schedule can be found on the
CDC immunization schedule website (https://www.cdc.gov/
vaccines/schedules). Health care providers are advised to use
the cover page, tables, notes, and appendix together to deter-
mine recommended vaccinations for patient populations.
This adult immunization schedule is recommended by ACIP
(https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip) and approved by CDC
(https://www.cdc.gov), the American College of Physicians
(https://www.acponline.org), the American Academy of Family
Physicians (https://www.aafp.org), the American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (https://www.acog.org),
the American College of Nurse-Midwives (https://www.
midwife.org), the American Academy of Physician Associates
(https://www.aapa.org), the American Pharmacists Association
(https://www.pharmacist.com), and the Society for Healthcare
Epidemiology of America (https://shea-online.org).
ACIP’s recommendations for the use of each vaccine are
developed after in-depth reviews of vaccine-related data,
including disease epidemiology and societal impacts, vaccine
efficacy and effectiveness, vaccine safety, quality of evidence,
feasibility of program implementation, and economic analyses
of immunization policy (1). The adult immunization schedule
is published annually to consolidate and summarize updates to
ACIP recommendations on vaccination of adults and to assist
health care providers in implementing current ACIP recom-
mendations. The use of vaccine trade names in this report and
* Recommendations for routine use of vaccines in adults are developed by ACIP,
a federal advisory committee chartered to provide expert external advice and
guidance to the CDC director on use of vaccines and related agents for the
control of vaccine-preventable diseases in the civilian population of the United
States. Recommendations for routine use of vaccines in adults are harmonized
to the greatest extent possible with recommendations made by the American
Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACIP recommendations
approved by the CDC director become agency guidelines on the date published
in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Additional information about
ACIP is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/.
Past immunization schedules are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/
schedules/hcp/schedule-related-resources.html#accordion-2-collapse-3.
in the adult immunization schedule is for identification pur-
poses only and does not imply endorsement by ACIP or CDC.
For further guidance on the use of each vaccine, including
any changes that might occur after annual publication of
the adult immunization schedule, health care providers are
referred to the respective ACIP vaccine recommendations
at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs. If errors or
omissions are discovered within the schedule, CDC will post
revised versions on the CDC immunization schedule website.§
Printable versions of the 2023 adult immunization schedule
and instructions for ordering hard copies of the schedule are
available on the immunization schedule website (https://www.
cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules).
Changes in the 2023 Adult Immunization
Schedule
Vaccine-specific changes in the 2023 immunization schedule
for adults aged ≥19 years include new or updated ACIP
recommendations for influenza vaccines (2) and pneumococcal
vaccines (3). Additional information was added for the
measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR), meningococcal
vaccine, and recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) sections.
The hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) section was rearranged and
revised to improve clarity in the language, and minor edits
were made to the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis
vaccination (Tdap) notes to improve readability. In addition,
COVID-19 vaccines have been added to the Tables and to the
Notes sections summarizing ACIP recommendations. A new
poliovirus vaccination section was also added to the Notes
section to describe the use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine
(IPV) in adults who are at increased risk for exposure to
polioviruses. Changes were also made to the appendix section
to improve clarity in the language.
§ CDC encourages organizations to use syndication as a more reliable method
for displaying the most current and accurate immunization schedules on an
organization’s website rather than copying these schedules to their websites.
Use of content syndication requires a one-time step that ensures an organization’s
website displays current schedules as soon as they are published or revised;
instructions for the syndication code are available on CDC’s website (https://
www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/resource-library/syndicate.html). CDC also
offers technical assistance for implementing this form of content syndication
(requests can be e-mailed to ncirdwebteam@cdc.gov).
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
142 MMWR / February 10, 2023 / Vol. 72 / No. 6 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Cover page
The American Pharmacists Association has been added as
a partner organization approving the adult immunization
schedule.
A newly recommended HepB vaccine (PreHevbrio) and a
newly recommended MMR vaccine (Priorix) have been
added to the table of vaccine abbreviations and trade names.
COVID-19 vaccines have been added to the table of vaccine
abbreviations and trade names. ACIP has developed new
abbreviations for the COVID-19 vaccine products. These
abbreviations contain information on the vaccine’s valency
(i.e., monovalent versus bivalent, indicated by “1v” and
“2v,” respectively) and vaccine platform (mRNA versus
acellular protein subunit, or “aPS”).
The pneumococcal conjugate vaccines PCV15 and PCV20
have been combined into one row in the table of vaccine
abbreviations and trade names.
The language in the injury claims section has been
modified to indicate which vaccines are covered by the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and
which vaccines are covered by the Countermeasures Injury
Compensation Program.
Table 1 (Routine Immunization Schedule)
COVID-19 row: The COVID-19 vaccine row is a new
addition to the tables this year. The color of this row is
yellow, indicating that COVID-19 vaccination is now
routinely recommended for all adults. The text overlay
states, “2- or 3-dose primary series and booster (See Notes).
MMR row: Overlaying text has been added to the column
for persons aged ≥65 years referring providers to the notes
for vaccination considerations for health care personnel
in this age group.
Hepatitis A row: The overlaying text has been updated
to “2, 3, or 4 doses depending on vaccine,” to account for
the possibility of an accelerated Twinrix series requiring
4 doses.
Table 2 (Immunization by Medical Indication Schedule)
COVID-19 row: The COVID-19 vaccine row is a new
addition to the tables this year. The color of this row is
yellow, indicating that COVID-19 vaccination is now
routinely recommended for adults with any of the medical
conditions or other indications listed. The text overlay for
the immunocompromised and HIV infection columns
states, “See Notes,” referring providers to the notes for
specific recommendations for this population.
Hepatitis A row: The overlaying text has been updated
to “2, 3, or 4 doses depending on vaccine,” to account for
the possibility of an accelerated Twinrix series requiring
4 doses.
Vaccine Notes
The notes for each vaccine are presented in alphabetical
order. Edits have been made throughout the Notes section to
harmonize language between the child and adolescent and the
adult immunization schedules to the greatest extent possible.
COVID-19: A new section was added to provide
additional details for use of COVID-19 vaccines. The
“Routine vaccination” section describes the primary series
recommendations for the general population. The “Special
situations” section describes the primary series
recommendations for persons who are moderately or
severely immunocompromised. Hyperlinks have been
provided referring health care providers to the latest
guidance for booster dose recommendations in both
populations, and to the recommendation for persons who
received the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19
vaccine. Additionally, hyperlinks to the current COVID-19
vaccination schedules, use of COVID-19 preexposure
prophylaxis in persons who are moderately or severely
immunocompromised, as well as Emergency Use
Authorization indications for COVID-19 vaccines, have
been added.
HepB: In the “Routine vaccination” section, PreHevbrio
was added to the description of the 3-dose series, and
information on the 4-dose series for persons on hemodialysis
was moved to the “Special situations” section. HepB
vaccination continues to be universally recommended for
all adults aged 19–59 years. Language has been added
stating that persons aged ≥60 years with known risk factors
for hepatitis B virus infection should complete a HepB
vaccination series, whereas persons aged ≥60 years without
known risk factors for hepatitis B virus infection may
complete a HepB vaccination series.
Influenza: Information was added to the routine
vaccination section for persons aged ≥65 years stating that
any one of quadrivalent high-dose inactivated influenza
vaccine, quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine, or
quadrivalent adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine is
preferred for this age group. A hyperlink to the 2022–23
influenza recommendations and a bullet for the 2023–24
influenza recommendations were added. In the “Special
situations” section, guidance for close contacts of severely
immunocompromised patients who require a protected
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / February 10, 2023 / Vol. 72 / No. 6 143
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
environment was added. In addition, the text describing
guidance for persons with egg allergy who have experienced
any symptom other than hives was moved from the
appendix to the “Special situations” section.
MMR: In the “Special situations” section, a hyperlink was
provided that describes the recommendation for additional
doses of MMR vaccine (including the third dose of
MMR vaccine) in the context of a mumps outbreak setting.
Meningococcal: In the “Special situations” section for
meningococcal serogroup B vaccine, guidance was added
stating that if the third dose of Trumenba is administered
earlier than 4 months after the second dose, a fourth dose
should be administered ≥4 months after the third dose.
Pneumococcal: The section has been substantially
updated to reflect ACIP’s new recommendations for the
use of PCV15 and PCV20 in persons who previously
received pneumococcal vaccines. In addition, a hyperlink
to the CDC app that can be used to determine a patient’s
pneumococcal vaccination needs has been included.
Poliovirus: A new section was added summarizing
poliovirus vaccination recommendations for adults.
Although routine vaccination of adults residing in the
United States is not necessary, the “Special situations
section describes the use of IPV in adults who are at
increased risk for exposure to poliovirus.
Tdap: Minor changes were made to the “Special situations”
section to improve clarity in the language.
Zoster: The “Routine vaccination” section was revised to
clarify that serologic evidence of prior varicella is not
necessary for zoster vaccination and to provide guidance
for situations in which serologic evidence of varicella
susceptibility becomes available. The “Special situations”
section was updated to provide guidance for persons with
immunocompromising conditions who do not have a
documented history of varicella, varicella vaccination, or
herpes zoster. In addition, minor changes were made to
the immunocompromising conditions bullet to clarify that
this includes persons with HIV regardless of CD4 count.
Appendix (Contraindications and Precautions)
The header of the “Contraindications” column was
changed to “Contraindicated or not recommended.
Influenza (egg-based) row: The information for persons
with history of egg allergy was moved from the precautions
column to the influenza vaccination notes section.
HepB row: The language regarding the use of Heplisav-B
and PreHevbrio in pregnant persons was modified. The
language now states that “Heplisav-B and PreHevbrio are
not recommended because of lack of safety data in
pregnant persons. Use other hepatitis B vaccines if HepB
is indicated.” A footnote providing information on the
pregnancy exposure registries for persons who were
inadvertently vaccinated with Heplisav-B and PreHevbrio
while pregnant was added.
Human papillomavirus row: The language regarding the
use of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among
pregnant persons was modified. The language now states,
“pregnancy: HPV vaccination not recommended.”
Additional Information
The Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule, United
States, 2023, is available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/
schedules/hcp/adult.html and in the Annals of Internal Medicine
(https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M23-0041). The
full ACIP recommendations for each vaccine are also available
at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/index.html. All
vaccines identified in Tables 1 and 2 (except PCV20 and RZV)
also appear in the Recommended Immunization Schedule for
Children and Adolescents, United States, 2023 (https://www.
cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html).
The notes and appendices for vaccines that appear in both
the adult immunization schedule and the child and adolescent
immunization schedule have been harmonized to the greatest
extent possible.
Acknowledgments
Rosters of current and past members of the Advisory Committee
on Immunization Practices are available at https://www.cdc.gov/
vaccines/acip/members/index.html.
ACIP Combined Immunization Schedule Work Group
Kevin Ault (Chair). Members: Henry Bernstein, Carolyn Bridges,
Uzo Chukwuma, Sybil Cineas, Sarah Coles, Katherine Debiec,
Marci Drees, John Epling, Susan Farrall, Mary-Margaret Fill, Holly
Fontenot, Sandra Fryhofer, Kathleen Harriman, Robert Hopkins,
Molly Howell, Paul Hunter, Karen Ketner, David Kim, Jane
Kim, Marie-Michelle Leger, Susan Lett, Veronica McNally, Sarah
McQueen, Amy B. Middleman, Pia Pannaraj, Diane Peterson,
Chad Rittle, William Schaffner, Ken Schmader, Rhoda Sperling,
Patricia Stinchfield, Peter Szilagyi, and L.J. Tan. Contributors:
A. Patricia Wodi (CDC co-Lead), Neil Murthy (CDC co-Lead);
CDC contributors: Tara Anderson, Jennifer Collins, Erin Conners,
Laura Cooley, Samuel Crowe, Lisa Grohskopf, Elisha Hall, Susan
Hariri, Holly Hill, Suzanne Johnson-DeLeon, Sarah Kidd, Miwako
Kobayashi, Andrew Kroger, Elisabeth Krow-Lucal, Tatiana Lanzieri,
Mona Marin, Lauri Markowitz, Lucy McNamara, Noele Nelson,
Sara Oliver, Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, Gabriela Paz-Bailey, Hilda
Razzaghi, Janell Routh, Sarah Schillie, Tami Skoff, Jacqueline Tate,
Mark Weng, Donna Williams, Akiko Wilson, and JoEllen Wolicki.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
144 MMWR / February 10, 2023 / Vol. 72 / No. 6 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Corresponding author: Neil Murthy, nmurthy@cdc.gov.
1Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and
Respiratory Diseases, CDC; 2Fanny Strong Foundation, West Bloomfield,
Michigan; 3The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence,
Rhode Island; 4University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
All authors have completed and submitted the International
Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of
potential conflicts of interest. Veronica McNally reports that she is
the president of the Franny Strong Foundation. Kevin Ault reports
having received consulting fees from PathoVax, serving as a volunteer
on the medical advisory board of Family Fighting Flu, and as a
committee member of the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
References
1. CDC. Charter of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC;
2018. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/committee/acip-charter.pdf
2. Grohskopf LA, Blanton LH, Ferdinands JM, et al. Prevention and control
of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory
Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, 2022–23
influenza season. MMWR Recomm Rep 2022;71(No. RR-1):1–28.
PMID:36006864 https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7101a1
3. CDC. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). ACIP
recommendations. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human
Services, CDC; 2022. Accessed December 7, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/
vaccines/acip/recommendations.html
... Several scientific societies have established recommendations regarding vaccination for patients with chronic liver diseases [43,44] who have a lower rate of seroconversion and a weaker immune response [45] and, thus, a higher incidence of complications and mortality. Specifically, British [43], American [46,47], and French health authorities [48] have agreed that vaccinations for hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza (recommended annually) [49], and pneumococcus (for which a booster dose is also recommended after 3-5 years) are recommended in this specific population. ...
... In addition, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends administering recombinant zoster vaccine to adults >50 years of age with chronic liver disease [47]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Vaccines prevent a significant number of deaths annually. However, certain populations do not respond adequately to vaccination due to impaired immune systems. Cirrhosis, a condition marked by a profound disruption of immunity, impairs the normal immunization process. Critical vaccines for cirrhotic patients, such as the hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, pneumococcal, and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), often elicit suboptimal responses in these individuals. The humoral response, essential for immunization, is less effective in cirrhosis due to a decline in B memory cells and an increase in plasma blasts, which interfere with the creation of a long-lasting response to antigen vaccination. Additionally, some T cell subtypes exhibit reduced activation in cirrhosis. Nonetheless, the persistence of memory T cell activity, while not preventing infections, may help to attenuate the severity of diseases in these patients. Alongside that, the impairment of innate immunity, particularly in dendritic cells (DCs), prevents the normal priming of adaptive immunity, interrupting the immunization process at its onset. Furthermore, cirrhosis disrupts the gut–liver axis balance, causing dysbiosis, reduced production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), increased intestinal permeability, and bacterial translocation. Undermining the physiological activity of the immune system, these alterations could impact the vaccine response. Enhancing the understanding of the molecular and cellular factors contributing to impaired vaccination responses in cirrhotic patients is crucial for improving vaccine efficacy in this population and developing better prevention strategies.
... For kidney transplant recipients, adhering to general population recommendations, age-appropriate vaccinations are recommended [57,60]. Live attenuated vaccines should be avoided posttransplant, and transplantation delayed by 4 weeks, if administered. ...
... Generally, posttransplant vaccination is ideally delayed by 3-6 months, except for inactivated influenza vaccination, which can begin after one month to cover the flu season. Certain non-live viral vaccines like hepatitis A, B, and HPV are considered for post-transplant recipients lacking pre-transplantation vaccination, seropositivity, or inadequate titers (anti-HBS) [60]. However, seroconversion rates may be suboptimal. ...
Article
Full-text available
Patients with kidney transplants have a significant co-morbidity index, due to a high number of pre-existing conditions and use of immunosuppression medications. These patients are at higher risk of developing conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, post-transplant diabetes, cardiovascular events, and anemia. Moreover, they are particularly susceptible to infections such as urinary tract infections or pyelonephritis, cancers, and gastrointestinal complications such as diarrhea, which in turn may be attributed to medication adverse effects or infectious causes. Along with these concerns, meticulous management of electrolytes and allograft function is essential. Prior to prescribing any new medications, it is imperative to exercise caution in identifying potential interactions with immunosuppression drugs. This review aims to equip primary care practitioners to address these complex issues and appropriate methods of delivering care to this rapidly growing highly susceptible group.
... The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued recommendations outlining a list of vaccines and their corresponding schedules for patients undergoing splenectomy [7]. Despite these guidelines, numerous studies in the literature highlight the prevalent issue of inadequate adherence to proper vaccination protocols among these individuals. ...
Article
Full-text available
The incidence of splenectomy due to traumatic injuries has decreased globally, owing to the advancements in hospital facilities and angioembolization techniques. Nevertheless, some patients still undergo splenectomy, leading to a lifelong risk of post-splenectomy sepsis. This risk is particularly heightened in immunocompromised individuals, presenting significant challenges in managing and preventing such infections. Compounding these challenges is the absence of comprehensive national guidelines and a splenic registry. While there have been improvements in postoperative prophylaxis through vaccination, patient education, and antibiotic usage, evidence supporting these strategies in immunocompromised patients remains lacking. Thus, there is an urgent need for expanded research in these areas to mitigate the morbidity and mortality associated with post-splenectomy sepsis in this vulnerable population. We report our experience of a young male having a penetrating abdominal injury who underwent splenectomy and had an immunocompromised status with both Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) positive status.
... on the use of the nine-valent HPV vaccine to prevent HPV infections. A summary of vaccines available in Korea is also added as follows [17][18][19]]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Korean Association of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation (KAUTII) and the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency updated the guidelines for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine against sexually transmitted HPV infections in Korea to respond to changing epidemiologic trends, evolving scientific evidence, and advances in laboratory diagnostics and research. Main purpose and recommendation of vaccination against HPV are as follows: (1) the purpose of HPV vaccine is to reduce the risk of genital warts and HPV-related cancers including cervical and vulvar cancer, head and neck cancer, anal cancer, and penile cancer; (2) in Korea, bivalent (16, 18) vaccines, quadrivalent vaccines (6, 11, 16, 18), and 9-valent vaccines (6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58) are used depending on the type of HPV; (3) bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines are national immunizations targeting girls aged 11–12 years and low-income young females aged 18–26 years (age and range of inoculation: routinely administered at 11 or 12 years of age, 2 doses at 0 and 6 months for 12–14 years of age; for females aged 15–26 years, 3 doses depending on the type of vaccine; vaccination can be given to those aged up to 45 years through consultation with a clinician); (4) in the case of administering 2 doses, at least 5 months apart; in the case of administering 3 doses, it is recommended to keep 4 weeks between the 1st and 2nd doses, 12 weeks between the 2nd and 3rd doses, and 5 months between the 1st and 3rd doses; (5) immunocompromised patients such as those with HIV, malignant neoplasms, and autoimmune diseases, and those undergoing transplantation or immunosuppressive therapy should receive 3 doses. HPV vaccine is not recommended during pregnancy.
... Hepatitis B vaccination is strongly recommended for all patients with CLD [18,19]. Despite this recommendation, the actual vaccination coverage is alarmingly low. ...
Article
Full-text available
This review addresses the vital role of vaccinations in managing patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), especially in the context of the post-COVID-19 landscape. The pandemic has highlighted the unique vulnerabilities of CLD patients, including those awaiting liver transplantation and post-transplant individuals, who face heightened risks of infection due to compromised immune responses. Recent advancements in vaccine technology, such as mRNA platforms, novel adjuvants, and advanced delivery systems, have significantly accelerated vaccine development, enhancing both speed and efficacy. Moreover, the emergence of personalized vaccines, tailored to everyone’s unique immunological profile, presents new opportunities, particularly for those with chronic conditions. This review synthesizes the current state of evidence regarding vaccine recommendations for CLD patients, focusing on their response to vaccinations and proposing effective strategies to protect this vulnerable group from vaccine-preventable diseases. It also explores the challenges in implementing these strategies and considers the impact of emerging vaccine delivery systems on improving outcomes for CLD patients. The paper aims to provide nuanced guidance on vaccination in the rapidly evolving healthcare landscape, addressing both technological innovations and comprehensive patient care strategies.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives The elderly are particularly prone to complications from a number of vaccine-preventable diseases. However, there are limited data on vaccine uptake for this vulnerable population in South Africa. Consequently, this study investigated influenza, pneumococcal and shingles vaccine uptake among elderly people in South Africa; reasons for their vaccination status; and factors associated with their uptake. Methods Cross-sectional study using an interviewer-administered questionnaire to survey 985 consenting adults aged ≥65 years in 2018. Participants were recruited from across South Africa. Bivariate analysis was used to identify socio-demographic variables associated with vaccine uptake, with multivariate logistic regression analysis used to identify key factors associated with vaccine uptake. Results Influenza vaccine uptake was 32.3% (318/985), with uptake highest in those aged 85–90 years. Pneumococcal and shingles vaccine uptake was 3.8% (37/985) and 0.4% (4/985) respectively, being highest among those aged >90 years. The strongest statistically significant predictors for influenza vaccination were previous influenza vaccination (OR: 8.42 [5.61–12.64]); identifying as ‘Coloured’ (OR: 8.39 [3.98–17.69]); and residing in Gauteng Province (OR: 5.44 [3.30–9.02]). The strongest statistically significant predictors of receiving pneumococcal vaccination included receiving influenza vaccination (OR = 10.67 [3.27–37.83]); residing in the Western Cape Province (OR: 7.34 [1.49–36.22]); identifying as ‘Indian’ (OR: 5.85 [2.53–13.55]); and having a university education (OR: 5.56 [1.25–24.77]). Statistically significant barriers to receiving influenza vaccination included following the Traditional African religion (OR: 0.08 [0.01–0.62]) and residing in Limpopo Province (OR: 0.16 [0.04–0.71]). The main reasons for non-vaccination were considering influenza as a mild illness (36.6%; 242/661), and lack of knowledge about the pneumococcal (93.4%; 886/948) and shingles (95.2%; 934/981) vaccines. Conclusion Vaccine uptake for all vaccines was sub-optimal, with multiple non-modifiable factors predicting vaccine uptake. These pre-COVID-19 data provide a baseline for measuring the effectiveness of future interventions to increase vaccine uptake and safeguard the health of the elderly.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Changing population demographics places a premium on optimizing older adult health. Vaccine-preventable diseases represent a substantial clinical and economic burden in older adults (≥65 years). Areas covered This narrative review summarizes the adult immunization landscape in three countries; Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Türkiye, informed by literature searches; PubMed (23–27 September 2023) supplemented by citation tracking via Google Scholar). Existing vaccination recommendations and published data were reviewed to evaluate vaccine uptake, chiefly focusing on core adult vaccines (seasonal influenza, pneumococcal, and herpes zoster). Barriers to vaccine access and uptake were reviewed, and initiatives to improve recommended vaccine uptake in older (≥65 years) or otherwise high-risk adults are described. Expert Opinion Uptake of recommended adult vaccines is low in all three countries. Receipt of annual seasonal influenza vaccine is typically below 50% in both older and at-risk younger adults; pneumococcal vaccination rates are even lower in eligible adults (<15% and often far lower), as is herpes zoster vaccine uptake (typically <5%). Low coverage is driven chiefly by low awareness of vaccine benefits, inconsistent recommendations, and vaccine hesitancy, together with often complex adult vaccine access pathways. Initiatives and remedies aimed at augmenting adult vaccination rates are warranted.
Article
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Care in Diabetes” includes the ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA’s clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Article
Full-text available
This report updates the 2021–22 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) concerning the use of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States (MMWR Recomm Rep 2021;70[No. RR-5]:1–24). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. For each recipient, a licensed and age-appropriate vaccine should be used. With the exception of vaccination for adults aged ≥65 years, ACIP makes no preferential recommendation for a specific vaccine when more than one licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate vaccine is available. All seasonal influenza vaccines expected to be available in the United States for the 2022–23 season are quadrivalent, containing hemagglutinin (HA) derived from one influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus, one influenza A(H3N2) virus, one influenza B/Victoria lineage virus, and one influenza B/Yamagata lineage virus. Inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV4s), recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) are expected to be available. Trivalent influenza vaccines are no longer available, but data that involve these vaccines are included for reference. Influenza vaccines might be available as early as July or August, but for most persons who need only 1 dose of influenza vaccine for the season, vaccination should ideally be offered during September or October. However, vaccination should continue after October and throughout the season as long as influenza viruses are circulating and unexpired vaccine is available. For most adults (particularly adults aged ≥65 years) and for pregnant persons in the first or second trimester, vaccination during July and August should be avoided unless there is concern that vaccination later in the season might not be possible. Certain children aged 6 months through 8 years need 2 doses; these children should receive the first dose as soon as possible after vaccine is available, including during July and August. Vaccination during July and August can be considered for children of any age who need only 1 dose for the season and for pregnant persons who are in the third trimester if vaccine is available during those months Updates described in this report reflect discussions during public meetings of ACIP that were held on October 20, 2021; January 12, 2022; February 23, 2022; and June 22, 2022. Primary updates to this report include the following three topics: 1) the composition of 2022–23 U.S. seasonal influenza vaccines; 2) updates to the description of influenza vaccines expected to be available for the 2022–23 season, including one influenza vaccine labeling change that occurred after the publication of the 2021–22 ACIP influenza recommendations; and 3) updates to the recommendations concerning vaccination of adults aged ≥65 years. First, the composition of 2022–23 U.S. influenza vaccines includes updates to the influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B/Victoria lineage components. U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines will contain HA derived from an influenza A/Victoria/2570/2019 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for egg-based vaccines) or an influenza A/Wisconsin/588/2019 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for cell culture–based or recombinant vaccines); an influenza A/Darwin/9/2021 (H3N2)-like virus (for egg-based vaccines) or an influenza A/Darwin/6/2021 (H3N2)-like virus (for cell culture–based or recombinant vaccines); an influenza B/Austria/1359417/2021 (Victoria lineage)-like virus; and an influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Yamagata lineage)-like virus. Second, the approved age indication for the cell culture–based inactivated influenza vaccine, Flucelvax Quadrivalent (ccIIV4), was changed in October 2021 from ≥2 years to ≥6 months. Third, recommendations for vaccination of adults aged ≥65 years have been modified. ACIP recommends that adults aged ≥65 years preferentially receive any one of the following higher dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccines: quadrivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV4), quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), or quadrivalent adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV4). If none of these three vaccines is available at an opportunity for vaccine administration, then any other age-appropriate influenza vaccine should be used This report focuses on recommendations for the use of vaccines for the prevention and control of seasonal influenza during the 2022–23 influenza season in the United States. A brief summary of the recommendations and a link to the most recent Background Document containing additional information are available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/vacc-specific/flu.html . These recommendations apply to U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines used according to Food and Drug Administration–licensed indications. Updates and other information are available from CDC’s influenza website ( https://www.cdc.gov/flu ). Vaccination and health care providers should check this site periodically for additional information.