ArticlePDF Available

The Influence of School’s Reward Systems on Students’ Development

Authors:

Abstract

This paper pays attention to how reward systems at school influence students’ development. Specifically, this paper discusses how different reward systems work on students with different life stage, and finally analyzes why those influence occur with the employment of reward systems, such as operant conditioning and reward addiction. In a nutshell, the paper reveals that school’s reward systems have both positive and negative effects on students’ development. They can attract students’ interests, foster good learning habits, establish a positive learning atmosphere, and increase students’ motivation. However, students may also develop reward addiction, increasing sensitivity to punishment, and decreasing intrinsic motivation. If teachers aim to maximize the advantages of reward systems, avoiding deficiencies and keep merits is an efficient way. This paper provides insights for several deficits in the usage of reward system, pointing out the importance of addressing those issues. Moreover, by showing positive influence of reward system, this paper emphasizes the advantages of reward systems and the accessibility of making it a better tool in the education setting. However, current research does not show whether the influence on reward system can be affected by individuals’ personalities. Thus, future direction of research can be oriented toward how people’s personalities exert effects on the impact of reward systems.
Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences EPHHR 2022
Volume 8 (2023)
1822
The Influence of School’s Reward Systems on Students’
Development
Zihan Chen *
University of California, Irvine, Irvine, 92697, The United States of America
* Corresponding Author Email: zihanc16@uci.edu
Abstract. This paper pays attention to how reward systems at school influence students’
development. Specifically, this paper discusses how different reward systems work on students with
different life stage, and finally analyzes why those influence occur with the employment of reward
systems, such as operant conditioning and reward addiction. In a nutshell, the paper reveals that
school’s reward systems have both positive and negative effects on students’ development. They
can attract students’ interests, foster good learning habits, establish a positive learning atmosphere,
and increase students’ motivation. However, students may also develop reward addiction, increasing
sensitivity to punishment, and decreasing intrinsic motivation. If teachers aim to maximize the
advantages of reward systems, avoiding deficiencies and keep merits is an efficient way. This paper
provides insights for several deficits in the usage of reward system, pointing out the importance of
addressing those issues. Moreover, by showing positive influence of reward system, this paper
emphasizes the advantages of reward systems and the accessibility of making it a better tool in the
education setting. However, current research does not show whether the influence on reward system
can be affected by individuals’ personalities. Thus, future direction of research can be oriented
toward how people’s personalities exert effects on the impact of reward systems.
Keywords: Reward systems; Students’ development; Age differences.
1. Introduction
Students’ growth has been one of the most significant concerns in countries all over the world.
Since some research [1,2] indicate that reward systems at school have substantial effects on students’
development, but the mechanisms behind the systems and the level of their influence are still
equivocal. Figuring out how the whole systems work and what effects they have can help teachers to
make better plans for educating students.
Former research did not focus on the effect of reward system on different ages of students and also
students with different personalities. Moreover, even though some research studies proposed flaws of
reward systems, they did not find solutions of the problems. As a result, this paper will demonstrate
effects of applying reward systems to students in different ages and unearth potential mechanism that
support the entire systems.
In the main body part, this paper will first introduce the characteristics of students in different life
stages, emphasizing the factors that may affect their growth. Then, this paper will discuss the flaws
and benefits of rewards to students. Lastly, reasons will be listed and analyzed.
2. Characteristics of Students in Different Ages
This paper will mainly focus on stages from primary school to high school and will first introduce
characteristics of primary school students, then middle school, and lastly high school.
2.1 Primary School Learners
Primary schoolers start to figure out who they are and what they want from the world. 6- to 8-year-
old students may act under the impact of impulsive and irrational emotions because of their immature
brain development [3]. As a result, students in this age range are very easy to do things without
considering any consequences. This is corresponded to the results of a 2019 study proceeded by
Chinese researchers [4]. In the study, researchers divided primary school learners into three
Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences EPHHR 2022
Volume 8 (2023)
1823
personality types based on Five-Factor analysis [4]. The resilient have the highest score, and the
undercontrolled have the lowest score. There was an upward trend in undercontrolled students, and it
reached the maximum level in grade 5 [4]. The reason why this trend took place is because primary
school students have insufficient self-regulation, which means that they do not have the ability to
control their feelings, emotions, and behaviors. However, since students in elementary schools show
“unlimited trust” and “obedience” to teachers and parents, it is a crucial time for teachers or parents
to promote their growth and teach them how to control themselves [3].
2.2 Middle School Learners
School work becomes a very important job for middle school learners to accomplish. Their
cognitive abilities develop, their memory retention increase, and their learning capabilities evolve.
Cognitively, their logical thinking swiftly enhances, so they gradually obtain the ability to think
properly. The expanding memory retention is significant for them since many exams require students
memorize the content in textbooks. At that time, middle schoolers seek for independence. They start
to disagree with teachers’ or parents’ ideas and sometimes deem they are wrong. They are willing to
accept new ideas, regardless of the quality. Also, in this age range, middle school learners confront
peer pressure and become anxious about their school grades [5]. In order to solve problems of learning
bad behaviors and overwhelming pressure, teachers could apply reward systems to encourage
students perform good behaviors and correctly deal with peer pressure.
2.3 High School Learners
High school learners face enormous stress on their academic works. Nevertheless, there are several
aspects of changes helping them to overcome certain difficulties. For example, their brains develop
maturely. The development of forebrain enables students to think critically, evaluate consequences
appropriately, regulate emotions properly, and memorize things efficiently [6]. Moreover, the well-
established self-esteem may allow students to remain competitive at school [6].
3. Categories of Reward Systems
Reward systems are methods that teachers use to boost students’ good behaviors in classrooms. It
can be divided into two categories: tangible reward systems and intangible rewards systems. Tangible
reward systems, also called external reward systems, include rewards like stickers, hand stamps, small
toys, crayons, and unbreakable mirrors [7]. Intangible reward systems, also called internal reward
systems, include teachers’ appreciation toward students’ works, a positive relationship with teachers,
and students’ senses of achievement [8].
4. The Influence of Reward Systems
4.1 The Positive Influence
Reward system stimulates students’ motivation to learn in both biological and psychological ways.
Students’ poor performance at school may be described to a lack of motivation. When students get
bad grades, they feel disappointed and do not know how to improve their grades. Without outside
help, they may feel less motivated to find solutions, so they keep being underperformed. Nevertheless,
when the teacher offers suggestions of improving grades and gives rewards after students are doing
better, students’ performance enhances. A longitudinal study by the University of Illinois’s
researchers has indicated that reward is a desirable thing for students, it can serve as an outside
reinforcement to increase students’ motivation to complete assignments and maintain good grades
[9]. Also, students could grasp a “healthy learning habit” by giving rewards properly [9]. Adrian
Galvan from the University of California, Los Angeles explores the corresponding brain functions,
and his finding suggests that students’ reward seeking behavior is highly correlated with hyper-
responsive dopamine system, meaning that the more desired rewards are given, the better
Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences EPHHR 2022
Volume 8 (2023)
1824
performance students can achieve [10]. As a result, through the application of reward system, students
could be highly responsive to the reward and will be motivated to reach a higher level of academic
performance.
Reward system can also reduce absenteeism. A study of Dagatan National High School
demonstrated that strategic reward intervention could effectively decrease students’ absenteeism [1].
Moreover, many teachers express positive perceptions toward the reward system. A study elicited
that all teachers agreed that reward have positive influence to students‘ learning [2]. Those teachers
found that rewards help establish a positive learning atmosphere, increase students’ participation, and
realize learning goals [2]. Furthermore, the study justified that students are happy to receive reward
from their teacher, and those rewards motivated them to study harder. When they got rewards, they
not only got recognition from teachers, but also obtained positive feedbacks that encouraged them to
inspire their spirits [2].
Overall, reward system is advantageous in increasing students’ motivation, fostering healthy
learning habits, and promote students’ developmental growth. By applying reward system like
behavioral charts or small toys to students, teachers could achieve their teaching goals efficiently.
Therefore, reward system is a powerful tool to develop students abilities. Importantly, the
appropriate use of reward systems can help students reach thier potentials.
Moreover, reward systems have different functions toward students in different ages, and for
students in different ages, teachers tend to use distinctive categories of reward systems. For primary
schoolers, reward systems can shape their appropriate behaviors, help them generate happy feelings
like a sense of pride and achievement, and increase their self-esteem [11]. In addition, they are more
likely to be motivated by external rewards like toys or stickers. But for middle school and high school
students, rewards are more likely to boost their academic performance and external motivations [12].
Moreover, they are more likely to be spurred by internal or intangible rewards like happiness caused
by their good exam scores.
4.2 Negative Influence
As teachers continuously use rewards in the teaching context, students could develop reward
addiction. It means that after repetitious exposure to rewards, students become reliant on them and
may not perform well if teachers stop giving rewards. This kind of addiction has several negative
effects. For example, a 2018 study revealed that reward addiction would increase students’ sensitivity
to punishment [13]. By implementing path analysis on the model constructed by several factors of
reward overdose and allergy to punishment, researchers discovered that the reward overdose variables
tremendously and positively affected students‘ level of fear to punishment [13]. Consequently, the
level of students‘ dependence on reward had a positive correlation with students‘ level of allergy to
punishment. The higher the addiction to reward, the more intense students‘ reaction to punishment.
The obvious outcome of increasing sensitivity to punishment is that students’ self-esteem is damaged
when they are punished [13]. Another harmful impact of reward addiction is losing control. While
gaining rewards from teachers, students feel delighted, and because they become dependent on
rewards, they will beocme out of control in exchange for the transient feeling of pleasure created by
reward systems [13]. The addiction will be intensified if the feeling of losing control continues, so
students will fall into a vicious cycle.
Additionally, most parents hold an opposing attitude toward the reward system in the classroom
because it brings increasingly competing pressure and inhibits intrinsic motivation. Some parents
state that reward system produces competing pressures, which causes children to be anxious and
“become overly critical” to themselves [14]. The behavior charts or color charts let students compete
and rank the performance of different students. Once students are behind others, and they do not earn
rewards, they may feel grieved and become afraid of not getting rewards in the future. This exerts
huge pressure on students and may destroy students’ confidence. Another reason parents demurring
reward system is that it impedes the development of intrinsic motivation [14]. This is due to the
reward addiction. Constant needs for reward have caused students to treat reward as a signal to
Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences EPHHR 2022
Volume 8 (2023)
1825
perform well in class. Without the signal, students may question whether they should do those
previous behaviors, and eventually abandon those good behaviors. They just focus on the reward, not
themselves. They have lost the ability to intrinsically motivate themselves.
In addition, there is no age difference for the negative influence of reward system on students’
development. For instance, for primary school, middle school, and high school students, they all will
develop addiction of reward and lower intrinsic motivations [11,12].
5. Reasons
5.1 Reasons of Positive Influence
5.1.1 Dopamine responsive
When a person is exposed to a rewarding stimulus, people’s brain areas will release a
neurotransmitter called dopamine [15]. Dopamine can be transferred in the brain, and through the
process of transportation, the level of dopamine increases. Since dopamine is related to reward and
pleasure, the increasing level of dopamine leads to people’s increasing satisfaction and happiness
created by rewards [15]. Thus, the more desired rewards are given, the better performance students
could achieve. In this way, reward is directly associated with students’ positive performance.
5.1.2 Operant conditioning
Operant conditioning is the theory behind the reward systems. It was proposed by B.F. Skinner
[16]. The mechanism of this theory is that “the consequences of a response” decide whether it will be
repeated [16]. Thus, theoretically, a behavior will be repeated if it is reinforced (rewarded) [16]. In
this way, desired behaviors can be achieved by giving rewards repetitively. In real-world situation,
for instance, if a teacher wants her students to actively participate in class, she can say “well done”
or “good job” every time after students answering her questions.
5.2 Reasons of Negative Influence
5.2.1 Reward addiction
Reward addiction is a phenomenon that people develop dependence upon both tangible rewards
and intangible rewards. The reason why it happens is that people’s dopamine system is highly
responsive to reward stimuli. When teachers give rewards to students, students’ dopamine system
will detect the intense stimuli and generate a sense of pleasure after receiving rewards [17]. Once
teachers continuously use reward systems, students’ dopamine systems will respond to stimuli that
“immediately precede and reliably predict the reward,” forming a strong association between
predictors and rewards [17]. In a long run, students’ responses to reward become reflexive and
eventually end with addiction.
5.2.2 Intrinsic motivtaion
Intrinsic motivation is a kind of motivation that do not require external rewards, which means that
people perform certain behaviors because they are enjoyable and meaningful [18]. The thing that can
destroy students’ intrinsic motivation is reward addiction, especially for tangible or external rewards.
Based on overjustification effect, when people are rewarded for doing something indeed “diminishes
intrinsic motivation to perform that action” [19]. As a result, an already internally rewarding activity
could turn to a less intrinsically motivated one [19]. Students gradually fixate on the external
rewarding motivation but ignore their ability to self-motivate.
6. Summary
Reward systems are instruments that teachers use at school. Tangible rewards like stickers and
behavioral charts and intangible rewards like students’ positive relationship with teachers are
frequently employed by teachers. This paper focuses on how reward systems at school can inflict
Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences EPHHR 2022
Volume 8 (2023)
1826
effects on students and how they will affect students’ development. Students in different ages have
different education backgrounds, possess distinctive levels of learning abilities, and will be affected
by reward systems to different extent. For example, reward systems help elementary school students
construct good behaviors and habits, but they assist middle schoolers to improve academic
performance. The application of reward systems to students in different ages have both positive and
negative effects. The positive effects contain healthy learning habits, positive learning environment,
and increasing motivations. The negative effects incorporate reward addiction, sensitivity to
punishment, diffidence, and lower intrinsic motivation. The mechanisms behind the positive
influence of reward system are operant conditioning and dopamine systems, which can reinforce
students‘ good behavior, enhance their academic performance, and foster healthy learning habits.
Reward systems‘ negative influences are caused by addiction and dopamine’s responsive feature with
rewards. By using reward systems, students may become dependenable on rewards for long-term
positive performance and lose their capabilities to motivate themselves. The significance of this paper
is alerting some educators and parents certain potential side effects of reward systems in classrooms
and encouraging scientists to conduct studies to overcome those problems and find ways to maximize
the efficiency of reward systems. Current studies lack exploration of the impact of students’
personalities on the implementation of reward systems. In addition, the measurement of the level of
reward overdose and fear to punishment is absent. Therefore, future studies should focus on how
students’ personalities can be affected by reward systems, figure out the basic patterns of the influence
and the potential benefits or risks of those influences, and form solutions or theories that can be
applied to take advantage of benefits or avoid risks. Additionally, it is crucial to create measurement
of students‘ obsession with reward and avoidance to punishment since these two elements are related
to students‘ development. If teachers could accurately measure students‘ reliance of reward and their
susceptibility to punishment, reward systems will escalate to a new level and function better in the
field of education.
References
[1] Beralde M. Reducing Student Absenteeism through Strategic Reward and Penalty System among Senior
High Students of Dagatan National High School. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
Abstracts, 2019, 3(2). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/8445.
[2] Saraswati, Ratminingsih. Utami. Students' and teachers' perception on reward in online English teaching
context. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 2022, 4(3).
303https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.27923.
[3] Nematovich N. A. Psychological Characteristics of Primary School Students of General Secondary
School. View of psychological characteristics of primary school students of General Secondary School
2022, https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjm/article/view/1756/1463.
[4] Yu Y, Y Zhang Y. Personality and developmental characteristics of primary school students’ personality
types. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693329.
[5] Morin A. Developmental milestones in middle school. Understood, 2022.
https://www.understood.org/en/articles/developmental-milestones-for-typical-middle-schoolers.
[6] Gustafson F., Richards. The physical, social & emotional characteristics of high school students. How To
Adult, 2020. https://howtoadult.com/physical-characteristics-high-school-students-8157910.html.
[7] Admin. Using reward systems in the classroom. Kaplan Early Learning Company, 2022.
https://blog.kaplanco.com/ii/using-reward-systems-in-the-classroom.
[8] Fuad M., Suyanto E., & Muhammad U. Can 'reward and punishment' improve student motivation?
Semantic Scholar, 1970. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Can-%E2%80%98Reward-and-
Punishment%E2%80%99-Improve-Student-Fuad-
Suyanto/d76a44c3234fc9c00e11ba349859483fb232b671.
[9] Wang L. A longitudinal study on activation to behaviors of reward. Proceedings of the 2021 International
Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021), 2021.
https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.248.
Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences EPHHR 2022
Volume 8 (2023)
1827
[10] Galvan A. Adolescent development of the reward system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.006.2010.
[11] eL, Infographics. Pros and cons of reward systems for primary school’s infographic - e-learning
infographics. 2015. https://elearninginfographics.com/pros-cons-reward-systems-primary-schools-
infographic/.
[12] Maria, WONG, MARGARETAMARIA, THOMSON. The effect of rewards on student motivation -
studia psy paed, 2014. https://studiapsypaed.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2-2014-8.pdf.
[13] Aypay A. Is reward a punishment? from reward addiction to sensitivity to punishment. International
Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 2018, 5(2): 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2018.02.001.
[14] Kowalski J. M., Froiland M. J. Parent perceptions of elementary classroom management systems and their
children’s motivational and emotional responses. Social Psychology of Education, 2020, 23(2): 433-448.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09543-5.
[15] Evans O., Guy. Brain reward system. Brain Reward System - Simply Psychology, 2021.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/brain-reward-system.html.
[16] Mcleod S. [Skinner - operant conditioning]. Study Guides for Psychology Students - Simply Psychology,
2018. https://www.simplypsychology.org/operant-conditioning.html.
[17] Wise A R, Robble A M. Dopamine and addiction. Annual Review of Psychology, 2022, 71(1): 79-106.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103337.
[18] Cherry K. Understanding intrinsic motivation. Verywell Mind, 2022.
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-intrinsic-motivation-2795385.
[19] Cherry K. Why does the overjustification effect reduce intrinsic motivation? Verywell Mind, 2022.
https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-overjustification-effect-
2795386#:~:text=The%20overjustification%20effect%20is%20a,motivation%20to%20perform%20that
%20action.
... Given that some students may be motivated by the rewards this scheme encourage, as its focus is on recording of good and bads with pending bonuses to reflect achievement-based nature. It might also demoralize others overlaying learning for a reward (Chen, 2023). ...
... Another concern with gamification is that it can fuel the competitive nature of students resulting in a belief contrary to what we hoped for, as to them learning is just competing (Chen, 2023). It can be understandably damaging for individuals who lag behind while the pace quickens, resulting in lowered self-efficacy and decreased engagement which eventually results in academic dropout. ...
... creative avenues which stimulate reflection based on student questions and innate desire to understand. Gamification can even be a little bit of a red herring, taking the focus too far out toward extrinsic rewards like points or badges and away from the learning (Chen, 2023). This may cause students to speed through their assignments for the incentives, bulldozing past key concepts in a trend that is making its way into top-level academic environments as well due to gamification. ...
... One of the strategies that the teacher uses with students in learning activities is using a reward. Rewards are one way to build student motivation in learning (Chen, 2022). It is one of the efforts of the teacher to make students more active in doing something to improve or maintain the achievement that is achieved. ...
... Intrinsic motivation refers to the drive to engage in a learning activity for its inherent satisfaction and personal interest. (Chen, 2022) describes intrinsic motivation as originating from within the individual, driven by a genuine desire to learn or achieve something for its own sake. On the other hand, extrinsic motivation is influenced by external factors such as rewards, grades, or recognition. ...
... By using rewards, teachers can create a positive environment that reflects care and appreciation for students' progress. (Chen, 2022) distinguishes between two types of reward systems: tangible and intangible. Tangible rewards, or external reward systems, include physical items like stickers, small toys, or other incentives. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to explore the impact of rewards on students' motivation to learn English, framed within an extrinsic motivation theoretical perspective. A mixed-methods research design was employed, combining quantitative data from questionnaires with qualitative insights from interviews. The sample consisted of 20 eleventh-grade students from one of the Islamic High School at MAS Al Mustaqim in Kubu Raya, selected through purposive sampling, with 5 students also participating in in-depth interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed that 75% of students strongly agreed that rewards such as praise and gifts significantly increased their motivation, with teacher influence being particularly impactful. Additionally, 75% of students agreed that receiving stationery as a reward for correct answers further enhanced their motivation. Interview data supported these findings, highlighting positive perceptions of rewards and increased enthusiasm for learning. The study concludes that extrinsic rewards can effectively boost students' motivation to learn English.
... In the context of spelling education, applying behaviourism involves conditioning techniques to reinforce accurate spelling and minimise errors. Positive reinforcement, such as praise or rewards, strengthens desired behaviour, creating associations between correct spelling and positive outcomes (Chen, 2023). ...
... Other responses included "You never shout at us" and "You never come to class angry and just yell at us like other teachers." These findings align with behaviourism theory, which supports the idea of modifying behaviour through reinforcement (Chen, 2023). These findings suggest that the researcher's behaviour served as a positive model, influencing how the grade 9 ESL learners behaved. ...
... A longitudinal study has shown that rewards are highly valued by students, serving as an outside reinforcement that can enhance their motivation to complete assignments and maintain good grades (Wang, 2021;Hussain et al., 2023). Beside the positive impact, Chen (2023) argued that the reward system can cause students to lost the ability to intrinsically motivate themselves. Therefore, teachers need to thoroughly examine the use of the reward system in the learning process. ...
Article
Full-text available
Collaboration is a core competency to promote effective teamwork and prepare students for success in both academic and professional environments. Permaculture gamification learning has the potential to enhance students' collaboration competency. Permaculture is an artificial ecosystem that encourages sustainable agricultural practices. There is a noticeable gap in the literature on integrating gamification into permaculture learning to improve students' collaboration skills. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the students’ collaboration competency improvement through the application of permaculture gamification as a learning strategy on ecosystem topics. This study used a quantitative research method with nonequivalent (pretest and posttest) control-group design. There are experimental group and control group, both groups take a pretest and posttest but only experimental group receives the treatment. The sample in this study consisted of 50 students from one high school in the city of Bandung. The students in the control group followed the regular learning process in the classroom. Meanwhile, the students in the experimental group followed the permaculture gamification learning. The instruments used in this study were collaboration assessment tools, including self-assessment, peer assessment, and observation rubric. Statistical t-test applied to analyze di difference on students collaboration competency outcomes after treatment. The N-Gain value was calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment to improve students’ collaboration competency. The t-test results showed that there is a significant difference in students’ collaboration competency between the two groups (p = 0.04). Permaculture gamification learning significantly improved students’s collaboration competency (p < 0.05). Based on the N-Gain value, permaculture gamification learning has a higher impact on students’ collaboration competency (N-Gain = 0.56) compared to the regular learning strategy (N-Gain = 0.40). It can be concluded that permaculture gamification learning can effectively improve students’ collaboration competency. Keywords: permaculture gamification, collaboration competency, ecosystem.
... These results are in line with the results of research (Chen, 2023) which states that giving rewards affects student interest in learning. ...
... These are examples of extrinsic rewards which are tangible in nature that teachers give their students that could influence their behavior (2024). According to Chen (2023), learners' motivation can be improved with the utilization of classroom reward system. Table 8 shows the survey mean scores, standard deviation, and interpretation for the learners' level of classroom engagement after receiving the treatment. ...
Preprint
Making research is a challenging task for students due to its nature, demands, and various guidelines to consider. Thus, many students are not enthusiastic about this subject. Most of the times, this is presented through lecture method that leads to boredom; thus, the researcher developed a gamified technique called Survivor Treasure Island. This study aimed to determine if this technique can enhance the learners’ motivation and classroom engagement. This employed pre-experimental research design and was implemented in eight (8) weeks. To measure the learners’ learners’ motivation and classroom engagement, they answered a validated survey questionnaire. The collected data were statistically treated using mean, standard deviation and t-Test of Independent Means. It was found out that the learners enjoyed the Survivor Treasure Island, as they became very highly motivated and very highly engaged in Practical Research 2 as shown in the survey mean scores. However, it revealed that sex and type of learning group are not determinants of their motivation and classroom engagement. To further analyze the effect of gamified technique, future researchers are encouraged to use triangulation method to get qualitative feedback. They may also explore its effect in other variables such as academic performance, critical, communication, and writing skills.
... However, non-monetary benefits, such as health insurance and investment opportunities, were perceived as lacking by some employees, highlighting an area where the organization could improve. According to Chen (2023), rewards that are more directly tied to employee performance, such as salary adjustments or bonuses, tend to be more effective in encouraging employees to work harder and develop their skills. Therefore, the organization may benefit from refining its reward system to offer more performance-based incentives and expanding the range of benefits to better meet employee needs. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of human resource management practices on employee performance at the Cadre Training and Conference Center (Hotel) in Xicheng District, Beijing. The unique challenges of HRM in the hospitality sector within a government-operated facility, which operates under different structural and operational constraints compared to private sector hotels.Methodology – This study involves surveying 180 employees at the Cadre Training and Conference Center in Beijing, selected through stratified random sampling. A questionnaire was used to gather data on human resource management practices and employee performance, covering three main sections: respondent information, HRM practices, and performance metrics. Data analysis includes descriptive statistics for initial data review and inferential statistics using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to test hypotheses, with a significance level set at 0.05.Results – human resource management practices, particularly in the areas of recruitment and selection, reward system, career management and performance appraisal, have a statistically significant influence on employee performance at Cadre Training and Conference Center (Hotel) in Xicheng District, Beijing, with a predictive power of 83.3%.Implications – The study suggests key implications for enhancing employee performance. Companies should improve performance appraisal systems to ensure fairness, transparency, and alignment with organizational goals. Recruitment processes should be thorough and transparent, attracting the right talent and supporting employee integration. A fair and well-communicated reward system is essential for maintaining motivation, and companies should offer additional benefits to meet employee needs. Lastly, clear career management strategies should be implemented to support employee growth, with regular monitoring to align career development with organizational goals.Originality/Value – This study offers new insights into how specific HRM practices—recruitment, reward systems, career management, and performance appraisals—significantly impact employee performance in the hospitality sector. It provides practical recommendations for improving HR strategies, making it valuable for HR professionals and managers in similar settings.
... However, individuals can also develop reward addiction, increased sensitivity to punishment, and decreased intrinsic motivation. If lecturers want to maximize the advantages of the reward system, avoiding disadvantages and maintaining advantages is an efficient way [115]. Several studies report that reward history is significantly related to students' motivational orientation and performance [116,117]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The progressive world of education needs to be accelerated by fulfilling the competencies of prospective teachers who are also progressive through a series of performance tasks that are relevant to learning needs in the 21st century. This research used Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) to innovate an integrated learning model for a micro-teaching course. A needs analysis was conducted on 75 students, two lecturers, and 30 teachers to assess actual performance, confirm desired performance, and identify causes of performance gaps. Researchers then designed performance tasks and validated them by 10 raters, tested them on 337 students to test the outer and inner models, and tested them on 30 students, 28 lecturers, and 49 teachers to test differences. Test content validity using the Aiken-V formula and test inter-rater reliability using ICC. Meanwhile, testing the validity and reliability of the construct uses outer and inner model analysis (CB-SEM), and the difference test uses ANOVA. The content validity results prove that all task performance meets the Aiken parameters (0.75-1.00), the interrater reliability value is 0.573, and the Cronbach alpha value is 0.931. Testing the outer model proves that the loading factor task performance value ranges from 0.709-0.874, the Cronbach alpha value ranges from 0.768-0.880, the composite reliability value ranges from 0.768-0.879, the AVE value ranges from 0.580-0.649, and the discriminant validity value ranges from 0.761-0.806. The inner model test proves that the Chi-Square/df value = 2.254, RMSEA value = 0.061, SRMR value = 0.036, NFI value = 0.910, TLI value = 0.936, and CFI value = 0.948. Meanwhile, the results of the ANOVA test confirm that the Sig value = 0.098, so it can be concluded that there are no significant differences between the three sample groups regarding the model innovation results. Thus, the 25-task performance in the integrated learning model has a significant psychometric function relative to the actual situation, so it becomes one of the references that lecturers can use to improve the competency of prospective teachers in micro-teaching courses (not limited to teaching skills, analytical thinking skills, academic integrity, and transformational leadership).
Article
On Lucía van Ryzin’s first day as a student teacher, she was given a sheet of stickers and told to give a sticker to each student who was seated, silent, and had a notebook out. As she walked around the room, she noticed that some students were more focused on getting the sticker than on thinking about their assignment. She uses the experience to weigh the value of extrinsic motivators like stickers for motivating student learning.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the current study was to investigate the personality characteristics and developmental characteristics of primary school students’ personality types in a cross-sectional sample of 10,366 Chinese children. The Personality Inventory for Primary School Student was used to evaluate primary school students’ personality. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to classify primary school students’ personality types. One-way ANOVA was used to explore the personality characteristics of personality types, and Chi-square tests were used to investigate grade and gender differences of primary school students’ personality types. Results showed that the primary school students could be divided into three personality types: the resilient, the overcontrolled, and the undercontrolled. Resilients had the highest scores, and undercontrollers had the lowest scores on all of five personality dimensions (intelligence, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional stability). The overcontrollers’ scores on personality were between the other two types, with lower emotional stability. As the grade level increased, the proportion of undercontrolled students in primary schools generally showed an upward trend and reached the maximum in grade 5. The proportion of resilient students in primary schools generally showed a downward trend. The proportion of resilient students was highest in grade 2 and lowest in grade 5. Girls were significantly more likely than boys to be resilient personality types, while boys were significantly more likely than girls to be undercontrolled personality types. The overcontrolled personality type did not show significant gender differences. Because of the undesirable internalizing problems related to overcontrollers and the externalizing problems related to undercontrollers, our results have implications for Chinese schools, families, and society in general.
Article
Full-text available
Rewarding is one of the factors that influence student learning outcomes so it is important to describe the reward given by the teacher, the teacher's perception of the reward and the student's perception of the reward given by the teacher. This qualitative study aimed to investigate the types of rewards used in teaching English online; frequency of rewarding by teachers in online learning; in what context the reward is given and for what purpose; how teachers perceive rewards in online learning; and how students perceive rewards in online classrooms. The subjects of this study were 116 people consisting of 112 first grade students and 4 first grade teachers. To collect data, there were 3 methods used, namely: observation, recording and taking note. Meanwhile, the main instrument was the researcher himself who was assisted by additional instruments, questionnaires and observation sheets. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively with the Miles and Hubberman model. The results of this study are 1) the teacher gives verbal and object rewards, 2) verbal rewards are more often given, 3) there are three contexts of giving rewards, namely: perfect, almost perfect and needs improvement with different goals, 4) teacher perceptions show giving rewards have a positive influence in academic and non-academic students and 5) students' perceptions of rewards are that they are very happy and motivated after receiving a reward. These results have implications for designing rewards to be diverse and creative to motivate students.
Article
Full-text available
Classroom management systems emphasizing rewards and consequences have long existed in schools within the US, but parental perceptions of the effects of these systems have largely been ignored. This survey study examined the ways in which 99 parents observed their children responding to various elementary classroom management systems. Regression results showed that behavior chart systems were negatively associated with student autonomous motivation to learn, whereas parent–school relationships and teacher autonomy support were positively associated with autonomous motivation. In hierarchical regression models, the frequency of students receiving rewards was negatively related to parent–school relationships. However, when teacher autonomy support (a strong positive predictor) was added to the model, the effects of reward frequency became non-significant. Parents’ open-ended responses revealed frustrations with systems that caused student anxiety, encouraged dependence on rewards, and oppressed students’ personalities. Implications include consideration of classroom management styles that better promote student autonomous motivation.
Article
Full-text available
This study introduces the topics of reward addiction and sensitivity to punishment in academic contexts to the literature. This study was designed firstly to develop reliable and valid measurement tools that can measure high school students' reward addiction and sensitivity to punishment in academic contexts, and secondly to test the structural equation model formed to identify the relationships between reward addiction and sensitivity to punishment. The participants of the study were a total of 506 high school students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the developed measurement tools were valid and reliable. According to the structural equation model formed between the variables of reward addiction and sensitivity to punishment, the reward addiction variable significantly and positively affected sensitivity to punishment. The findings of this study inform both parents and educators with a new perspective about the possible negative results of using punishment and rewards in academic context.
Article
Full-text available
Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by increased reward-seeking behavior. Investigators have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in conjunction with reward paradigms to test two opposing hypotheses about adolescent developmental changes in the striatum, a region implicated in reward processing. One hypothesis posits that the striatum is relatively hypo-responsive to rewards during adolescence, such that heightened reward-seeking behavior is necessary to achieve the same activation as adults. Another view suggests that during adolescence the striatal reward system is hyper-responsive, which subsequently results in greater reward-seeking. While evidence for both hypotheses has been reported, the field has generally converged on this latter hypothesis based on compelling evidence. In this review, I describe the evidence to support this notion, speculate on the disparate fMRI findings and conclude with future areas of inquiry to this fascinating question.
Article
Addiction is commonly identified with habitual nonmedical self-administration of drugs. It is usually defined by characteristics of intoxication or by characteristics of withdrawal symptoms. Such addictions can also be defined in terms of the brain mechanisms they activate; most addictive drugs cause elevations in extracellular levels of the neurotransmitter dopamine. Animals unable to synthesize or use dopamine lack the conditioned reflexes discussed by Pavlov or the appetitive behavior discussed by Craig; they have only unconditioned consummatory reflexes. Burst discharges (phasic firing) of dopamine-containing neurons are necessary to establish long-term memories associating predictive stimuli with rewards and punishers. Independent discharges of dopamine neurons (tonic or pacemaker firing) determine the motivation to respond to such cues. As a result of habitual intake of addictive drugs, dopamine receptors expressed in the brain are decreased, thereby reducing interest in activities not already stamped in by habitual rewards.
The physical, social & emotional characteristics of high school students
  • F Gustafson
  • Richards
Gustafson F., Richards. The physical, social & emotional characteristics of high school students. How To Adult, 2020. https://howtoadult.com/physical-characteristics-high-school-students-8157910.html.
Can 'reward and punishment' improve student motivation? Semantic Scholar
  • M Fuad
  • E Suyanto
  • U Muhammad
Fuad M., Suyanto E., & Muhammad U. Can 'reward and punishment' improve student motivation? Semantic Scholar, 1970. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Can-%E2%80%98Reward-and-Punishment%E2%80%99-Improve-Student-Fuad-Suyanto/d76a44c3234fc9c00e11ba349859483fb232b671.
Reducing Student Absenteeism through Strategic Reward and Penalty System among Senior High Students of Dagatan National High School
  • M Beralde
Beralde M. Reducing Student Absenteeism through Strategic Reward and Penalty System among Senior High Students of Dagatan National High School. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 2019, 3(2). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/8445.