ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Two prominent Artificial Intelligence (AI) competitors, Google's Bard, run by Language Model for Dialogue Applications (LaMDA) and OpenAI's Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), compete for supremacy in the market. LaMDA is a transformer-based neural language model pre-trained on online chat data. ChatGPT, on the other hand, is built on the GPT-3.5 architecture and incorporates a reinforcement learning model with human feedback. While Google's Bard is not yet available to the public, its search engine income has increased. ChatGPT, on the other hand, streamlines business, finance, marketing, entrepreneurship, accounting, education, healthcare, and many other operations rapidly. Who will win yet? Time will answer, but both companies are working hard to keep up with the AI revolution.
The AI Race is On! Google's Bard and OpenAI's ChatGPT Head to Head:
An Opinion Article
Md. Saidur Rahaman*
Department of Business Administration, Metropolitan University Sylhet, Bangladesh
saidurmgt@gmail.com
M. M. Tahmid Ahsan
Department of Business Administration, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology,Sylhet.
mm43@student.sust.edu
Nishath Anjum
Department of Business Administration, Metropolitan University Sylhet, Bangladesh
nishath.tonny@gmail.com
Md. Mizanur Rahman
BRAC Business School, BRAC University, Bangladesh
mizanur.rahman@bracu.ac.bd
Md. Nafizur Rahman
Department of Business Administration in Finance & Banking, Bangladesh University of
Professionals (BUP), Bangladesh
nafizrahman23@gmail.com
Abstract
Two prominent Artificial Intelligence (AI) competitors, Google's Bard, run
by Language Model for Dialogue Applications (LaMDA) and Open
AI's Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), compete for
supremacy in the market. LaMDA is a transformer-based neural language
model pre-trained on online chat data. ChatGPT, on the other hand, is built
on the GPT-3.5 architecture and incorporates a reinforcement learning
model with human feedback. While Google's Bard is not yet available to
the public, its search engine income has increased. ChatGPT, because of its
exceptional conversational technology, has attracted considerable attention
and established the standard for AI chatbots. Who will win yet? Time will
answer, but both companies are working hard to keep up with the AI
revolution.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT , Google’s Bard, LaMDA
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351785
Introduction
This world is continually evolving, and there is no point in arguing that
these changes significantly transform the contemporary world. Every day,
people around the globe discover and experience a new technological marvel.
Once upon a time, no one could have anticipated holding a device that could
connect individuals from any corner of the world. Besides, this device could
allow them to complete all of their tasks in the blink of an eye, take images, and
write notes on the same machine without needing a separate camera or notepad.
This is how contemporary technology evolves and enhances the lives of humans.
The wonders of modern technology, from the World Wide Web (WWW) to
Artificial Intelligence (AI), have never stopped astonishing people with
incredible capacities. These days, ChatGPT, an AI-based chatbot, has captured
the tech community's interest, causing the internet to break down. Google, on the
other hand, is the throneless monarch of the modern tech industry. They
consistently take the lead in technology like great leaders and develop many
novel scientific and technological innovations. So they must do more than just
stay quiet and watch. So, they are also getting ready for their AI-based chatbot,
Bard, which LaMDA will run. People have already started to look into what's
warmer in the tech world and imagine the race between Google's Bard, OpenAI's
ChatGPT, and even other tech industries.
In a similar vein, chatbots such as Bard and ChatGPT will perform the
same functions. Even though both companies are operating successfully,
competition is a natural and unavoidable occurrence in the market. Speaking of
rivalries, throughout the decades, mass people have experienced some classic
battles of tech giants like Samsung Vs Apple in the Cellular Phone industries (Park
& Kim, 2021), iOS Vs Android in the operating system of phones (Sahani,
2017), Ferrari facing off against Ford in the automobile industries (Baime,
2009), Airbus going head to head against Boeing (Jones, 2005); there is no scarcity
of examples. Nevertheless, the thing is, all that can be observed from these
rivalries is; that the most successful survivors could adapt to new changes
promptly and get accustomed to them. Like all these technological marvels from
the past decades, the present world is preparing to face another epic battle. This
time, it is between the two AI-based conversation tools/models: Bard by Google
and ChatGPT by Open AI.
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351785
Google's Bard AI and OpenAI's ChatGPT: The future of conversational AI
In November 2022, OpenAI released ChatGPT, the most sophisticated
language model. It is a neural network-based method for processing natural
language that OpenAI has shown to be a very successful AI-based conversational
tool, providing services with extremely high accuracy and efficiency in a concise
amount of time. On the other hand, Bard was purpose-built for conversational
agents like chatbots. Although both models have been pre-trained using vast
volumes of text data, ChatGPT has a more extensive training corpus and can
produce text in more contexts. ChatGPT could generate text based on the first
responses to increase the authenticity of discussions. However, Bard was created
from the bottom up to provide contextually appropriate responses to a wide
range of questions. Bard's capacity to produce text in various voices and registers
gives it versatility as a content-generation tool. While ChatGPT lacks this feature,
its text generation is more flexible and unpredictable. The ability of Google Bard
AI to react to its surroundings quickly sets it apart from ChatGPT. The Bard AI
can now answer client inquiries rapidly while ensuring the data's highest level of
correctness and veracity. Another unique quality of Bard is that it refrains from
drawing erroneous inferences or making poor judgments or comments based on
presumptions. Users must choose their Google Search options to continue
obtaining Google's standard search results while using Google Bard AI. LaMDA
serves as the initiative's LaMDA's engine. However, ChatGPT is built on GPT.
Duplicate content may be found using the AI Text Classifier tool, which has been
used as an integrated anti-plagiarism tool. The use of Bard, Google's AI assistant,
is currently free. Additionally, OpenAI's accessible version has been in use since
it was made available in November of last year. However, it has now released a
new version of ChatGPT, the tool's premium edition, allowing users to use
premium features and benefits. Compared to Google's Bard (LaMDA), which has
1.37 billion parameters and a massive vocabulary base of more than one and a
half trillion words (Dhanshree, 2023). ChatGPT has 175 billion parameters, which
indicates that ChatGPT has an advantage.
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351785
Bard takes on ChatGPT: A battle for dominance in the NLP market
The Natural Language Processing (NLP) market is still new for marketers;
thus, everything will be unique to them. Those who take advantage of the
opportunities will be more successful. ChatGPT has the upper hand right now
because they have been in the market longer and have made a name for
themselves. However, Google is different from the kind of company that sits
back and lets others do well while they take over the market and leave them with
nothing to do but watch. They are also developing a plan to use their different
styles to make an AI-based chatbot to talk to people and give them quick
answers. The most important thing about Bard is that it can make answers using
different metrics, which is a great way to ensure the answers are correct (Byryne
Hager, 2022). Alphabet Inc., which also owns popular social media sites like
YouTube and subsidiary companies like Fitbit and Waze, is the company that
owns Google. This is a significant advantage for Google. This means that Google
can quickly make a strong name for Bard, the latest trend. Employees can now
use a converter box to ask the Bard questions, get text answers from it, and rate
and score the quality of the answers given by the Bard Chatbot. CNBC says
several comments show that Bard's answers can keep up with current events, but
ChatGPT cannot (CNBC, 2023). Google's familiarity with end users will help
them get this product to those users. It has also been said that Microsoft will add
ChatGPT to its "Bing" search engine (SEJ SEO, 2023). Google Search Engine vs
Bing by Microsoft is about to become the biggest rivalry, which will be very
exciting for people (Reuters, 2023).
Technology-driven competition: Market share
The present era is the era of modern technology, and there is very intense
competition among the rivals of this industry. No one is willing to give a single
inch of space to another. Everyone is fighting for their piece of bread. So there is
no room for staying in a standstill position and allowing the other rivals to thrive
in the spotlight. Every company is trying their best to improve the quality of its
offerings to have a firm grab at the market share. Whenever a new technology
comes into the knowledge of everyone, the developer of it tries to make sure that
it remains unique and they continue to improve and develop it.
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351785
On the other hand, rivals try to bring out something more valuable than
the existing one. Since the marketplace is always competitive, it is the fact that
the more up-to-date and advanced the companies can become and offer their
products and services to the clients accordingly, the easier it gets for them to
ensure a bigger slice of the pizza in the market share. This allows Google to rule
the market with this AI-generated conversation tool. Nevertheless, as it is an
entirely new feature and a wide range of opportunities available for the firms, all
the companies have similar scope to thrive into success. There is no limit to the
opportunities available, but the correct decision-making would be the game
changer in this rivalry.
Conclusion
Last but not least, a significant worry for OpenAI and Google Inc. should
be that other tech giants like Meta are also keeping up; they are closely
monitoring the events and may also gather the necessary data to start the study
for developing their version of the AI-based chat tool. Therefore, Google will
endure challenging testing in the following weeks or months. Although Google
has been devoting many resources to this project for a while, they have opted to
publish it as soon as possible because further launch delays will make it harder
for them to compete. The earlier they arrive, the more chance they have of
grabbing the market.
References
Baime, A. J. (2009). Go like hell: Ford, Ferrari, and their battle for speed and glory at Le
Mans. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Byryne Hager (2022), How Google's LaMDA AI works, and why it seems so
much smarter than it is, Android Police, Access from,
https://www.androidpolice.com/what-is-google-lamda/
CNBC, (2023) https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/31/google-testing-chatgpt-like-
chatbot-apprentice-bard-with-employees.html
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-64546299
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351785
Dhanshree S.S. (2023, January, 03), Google AI’s LaMDA Vs OpenAI’s ChatGPT,
Marketpost, Access from,
https://www.marktechpost.com/2023/01/03/google-ais-lamda-vs-
openais-chatgpt/
Jones, W. D. (2005). Airbus vs. Boeing: Some battle stats. IEEE Spectrum, 42(8), 13-
13.
Park, B. J., & Kim, D. (2021). Coopetition dynamics between giant entrants and
incumbents in a new convergent segment: a case in the smartphone
industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 29(3), 455-476.
Reuters (2023), Google unveils ChatGPT rival Bard, AI search plans in battle with
Microsoft, The Business StandardAccess
from, https://www.tbsnews.net/tech/google-unveils-chatgpt-rival-bard-
ai-search-plans-battle-microsoft-581138
Sahani, A. (2017). Android v/s IOSThe unceasing battle. International Journal of
Computer Applications, 180(3), 23-26.
SEJ SEO (2023), Microsoft Announces ChatGPT Capabilities Coming To Bing,
SEARCH ENGINE JOURNAL, Access
from, https://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-announces-
chatgpt-capabilities-coming-to-bing/478803/#close
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351785
... The present-day era's fast scientific advancement means that people from all walks of life encounter and learn about new technical marvels daily [1]. Who knew that a chatbot could help people save time and work more efficiently? ...
... The statistical analysis comprises the quantification of word count, the total number of bibliographies, the identification of real bibliographies, the identification of fake bibliographies, and the utilization of the plagiarism checker program, Plagiarism Checker X. Then the accuracy will be computed after performing a comparison based on specified criteria presented as (1). ...
Article
Full-text available
Chatbots are getting better every day due to the advancements in their capabilities in today's technological age. This study aims to assess the efficacy of ChatGPT-4 and Gemini in producing scientific articles. Two types of prompts are given: direct questions and complete scenarios. Subsequently, we evaluate the educational and ethical aspects of the produced material by employing statistical analysis. We verify the credibility of references, detect any instances of plagiarism, and ensure the precision of the articles generated by the chatbot. In addition, we utilize topic modeling to assess the extent to which the content of the articles corresponds to the specified topic. According to the findings, Gemini outperformed ChatGPT-4, specifically in scenario questions, where it achieved an accuracy rate of 85%, while ChatGPT-4 only achieved 35% accuracy. This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA license.
... OpenAI's ChatGPT is widely used for its strong language understanding and generation capabilities [7]. Google's Bard leverages vast search data to provide factual and accurate information [8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Owing to the rapid growth in the popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs), various performance evaluation studies have been conducted to confirm their applicability in the medical field. However, there is still no clear framework for evaluating LLMs. Objective This study reviews studies on LLM evaluations in the medical field and analyzes the research methods used in these studies. It aims to provide a reference for future researchers designing LLM studies. Methods & materials We conducted a scoping review of three databases (PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE) to identify LLM-related articles published between January 1, 2023, and September 30, 2023. We analyzed the types of methods, number of questions (queries), evaluators, repeat measurements, additional analysis methods, use of prompt engineering, and metrics other than accuracy. Results A total of 142 articles met the inclusion criteria. LLM evaluation was primarily categorized as either providing test examinations (n = 53, 37.3%) or being evaluated by a medical professional (n = 80, 56.3%), with some hybrid cases (n = 5, 3.5%) or a combination of the two (n = 4, 2.8%). Most studies had 100 or fewer questions (n = 18, 29.0%), 15 (24.2%) performed repeated measurements, 18 (29.0%) performed additional analyses, and 8 (12.9%) used prompt engineering. For medical assessment, most studies used 50 or fewer queries (n = 54, 64.3%), had two evaluators (n = 43, 48.3%), and 14 (14.7%) used prompt engineering. Conclusions More research is required regarding the application of LLMs in healthcare. Although previous studies have evaluated performance, future studies will likely focus on improving performance. A well-structured methodology is required for these studies to be conducted systematically.
... As for some previous research used as literature review material, such as research. conducted by [23] In this article, it discusses the intense competition between two leading AIs, Google Bard (Gemini) by Google and ChatGPT by OpenAI. The conclusion of this article is that the major concern for OpenAI and Google Inc. is that other tech giants like Meta are also keeping up with these developments; they are closely monitoring these events and may also be collecting the necessary data to begin studies to develop their own versions of AI-based chat tools. ...
Article
Full-text available
AI is becoming more and more crucial in the digital age to support kids in overcoming obstacles to learning and succeeding academically. The use of chatbots is one example of AI progress. Two well-known chatbots are Gemini and ChatGPT. Because they are useful and support a variety of learning tasks, including answering questions, producing articles, expanding knowledge, and other academic activities, both applications are highly well-liked and preferred by students. By using a case study on the Facebook community with the number of samples needed in this study as many as 377 respondents based on the Krejcie and Morgan formula, The purpose of this study was to determine whether user experiences with different applications differed. User experience measurement was carried out using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) approach on the variables of Efficiency, Novelty, Attractiveness, Stimulation, Perspicuity, and Dependability. The results of the study show that all user experience variables for the ChatGPT and Gemini applications received poor ratings, and there were no significant differences in any of these variables. However, based on UEQ measurements, it was found that both applications received better scores on the stimulation and novelty variables, while the attractiveness, clarity, efficiency, and accuracy variables received poor results. To improve user experience in the ChatGPT and Gemini applications, the quality of all variables needs to be enhanced.
... OpenAI's Chatbot, "Chat GPT," stands poised to revolutionize the industry with its vast knowledge base (Lund and Wang, 2023). Google has also made its mark with "Gemini," leveraging its expansive network and real-time updates (Rahaman et al., 2023). Organizations and institutions are increasingly adopting artificial intelligence (AI) across all fields of business and management including human resource management (HRM) (Bhatt and Muduli, 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Research on training and/or L&D effectiveness is predominantly conducted in a traditional L&D context. Little research is conducted on training and/or L&D in the context of artificial intelligence (AI)-based learning. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between the adoption of AI-based learning systems and learners’ behavior. Drawing from the theory of planned behavior, the research examines the impact of attitude (ATT), subjective norm (SN) and perceived behavioral control (PBC) as AI-based learning intention (ALI) factors relate to changes in learners' behavior. Additionally, inspired by the self-determination theory by Deci and Ryan, the study further examines the mediating role of learner engagement between ALI and behavioral change. Design/methodology/approach Following a theoretical framework and using a systematic literature review method, the survey research has been planned by considering a sample from Indian industries. The collected data have been analyzed using SPSS-AMOS 27. While path analysis has been conducted to analyze the direct impact of ALI on learners' behavior, Hay’s PROCESS macro has been used to check the mediating impact of learner engagement between ALI and learners' behavior. Findings The results proved a significant and positive impact of all ALI factors such as ATT, SN and PBC on learners’ behavioral change. Further, the research found that learning engagement (LE) successfully mediates between AI learning intention and behavioral change. Originality/value In the absence of any empirical study in identifying the relationship among learning intention, LE and behavioral outcome, the result of this study may provide useful insights to researchers and practitioners.
... Google Bard is trained on a dataset that includes text sourced from the internet, making it more likely to stay up-to-date with current events. In contrast, ChatGPT is trained on a dataset comprising text from books and articles, contributing to its accuracy in responding to factual questions [1,2,3]. These advanced chatbots mark a significant leap forward in the capabilities of AI-powered conversational agents, demonstrating not only their linguistic prowess but also their potential impact on delivering accurate and up-to-date information across various domains. ...
Article
Full-text available
AI chatbots emerged as a groundbreaking technology, poised to revolutionize education by offering immediate support, answering queries, and providing additional resources. This paper delves into the myriad ways AI chatbots are reshaping education, serving as virtual teaching assistants, and transforming the learning experience. The objective is to comprehensively explore the benefits, challenges, potential limitations, concerns, and prospects associated with integrating AI chatbots into educational settings. Through an exhaustive search across academic databases, relevant studies were selected based on predefined criteria for an in-depth review. The research findings highlight the extensive advantages of incorporating AI chatbots in education, focusing on the perspectives of both students and educators. Students derive significant benefits in three primary areas: homework and study assistance, personalized learning experiences, and skill development. Educators, on the other hand, experience advantages such as time-saving assistance and improved pedagogy. However, the research also underscores substantial challenges and critical considerations that educators must meticulously address. These challenges encompass issues related to the reliability, accuracy, and ethical implications of AI applications in education. As AI chatbots continue to gain prominence, this paper provides valuable insights into harnessing their potential while navigating the ethical and practical complexities inherent in their implementation in educational environments. The comprehensive examination of benefits and challenges serves as a guide for educators and policymakers aiming to leverage AI chatbots effectively in the ever-evolving landscape of education.
... ChatGPT is based on the GPT architecture, which emphasizes NLP capabilities, including generating contextually rich and accurate text. Gemini, while also designed for conversational agents, focuses more on handling dynamic, real-time queries through advanced data processing systems [9,11]. ...
Article
Full-text available
ChatGPT, an advanced language model, presents an opportunity to enhance human-robot collaboration by integrating a custom voice assistant. This approach tackles a fundamental problem in human-robot interaction (HRI) effective communication between humans and machines. By combining ChatGPT's natural language processing capabilities with a tailored voice interface, users can communicate with robots in their native language. The solution involves training ChatGPT on multilingual datasets, optimizing responses for context-relevant interactions, and ensuring flexibility across robotic platforms. Compared to traditional HRI methods, ChatGPT-based voice assistants offer several advantages. They enable more natural and intuitive communication, reducing the cognitive load on users. Additionally, the language model's contextual understanding and adaptive learning capabilities facilitate more personalized and engaging interactions. However, challenges persist, including potential biases inherited from training data, difficulty handling ambiguous queries, and ensuring factual accuracy. This paper reviews the applications of ChatGPT in HRI, highlighting its potential to revolutionize human-machine collaboration. It discusses the implementation approach, advantages, and limitations. Furthermore, it explores the role of natural language processing in affective computing and emotion recognition for enhanced social intelligence in robots. Overall, the integration of ChatGPT presents a promising avenue for advancing HRI towards more seamless, productive, and user-friendly interactions.
... Despite many obstacles in the development 236 and implementation procedure, such as sentinent behavior, LaMDA, and PaLM are 237 utilized to develop Bard chatbot [142,143]. Bard is an AI-powered chatbot designed to 238 be more conversational and generate more diverse and prolonged responses than GPT 239 models [144,145]. Claude and Claude 2.0 are two of the other powerful chatbots 240 released recently, with superior performance to generate longer responses and nuanced 241 reasoning [146,147]. Claude 2.0 has made significant strides in multiple fields, including 242 law and mathematics. ...
Article
Full-text available
Considering some drawbacks, the application of Chat Generative Pre-training Transformer (ChatGPT) in sustainable business, economics, and entrepreneurial projects has numerous advantages. This review seeks to comprehend the present scenario of ChatGPT utilization in business, economics, and entrepreneurial domains and its perceived benefits and drawbacks. The researchers employed a scoping literature review. Researchers used the SCOPUS and Google Scholar databases from January 2023 to March 2024. The research employed a five-stage process to design the study along with the guidelines of the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Finally, to synthesize the result, researchers used a thematic framework. Researchers included 40 studies excluding non-English records, clinical studies on ChatGPT, comparisons of ChatGPT performance on examinations to people and publications from non-academic sources like newspapers, internet websites, magazines, etc. The findings reveal that ChatGPT can augment decision-making procedures and boost the effectiveness of diverse business, economic, and entrepreneurial operations. In addition, organizations can enhance their ability to engage with consumers and clients, resulting in improved relationship-building and quick decision-making processes. Moreover, the over-dependence on ChatGPT raises ethical and privacy apprehensions. It is crucial to consider that ChatGPT requires further improvement in terms of reliability; it is currently prone to numerous errors and generates unsuitable responses for some contexts. The study also provides directions for future research on the application of ChatGPT. Ultimately, business organizations, entrepreneurs, and general readers will comprehensively understand the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating ChatGPT in the business , economics, and entrepreneurship world. Research Paper
Chapter
Students often approach statistics or other quantitative courses with dread and a disbelief in their ability to succeed, and this poses a great challenge to the educators to deliver the course and keep the learners motivated and engaged. This challenge is even higher for the new educators teaching statistics for the first time. Statistics is a complex subject that requires not only mathematical skills but also critical thinking and analytical reasoning. Hence, this paper uses ChatGPT as a supporting pedagogical tool to guide as how the instructors can design innovative teaching strategies such as flipped classroom, gamification to make this challenging course interesting. Additionally, this paper proposes some online tools and learning activities which the instructors can use in their classroom, and all these suggestions are supported by the responses generated by ChatGPT. Along with the advantages offered, ChatGPT also brings some disadvantages, and hence, the educators need to also conduct their independent research rather than totally relying on ChatGPT as a support system.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Generative AI (artificial intelligence) refers to algorithms and models that can be prompted to generate various types of content. Generative AI has quickly become a major factor in several industries, including health care. It has the potential to transform the sector, but we must understand how to use this technology in order to capitalize on its potential while avoiding the risks that may come with it while applying it to patient care. These models have played a crucial role in analyzing diverse forms of data, including medical imaging (encompassing image reconstruction, image-to-image translation, image generation, and image classification), clinical documentation, diagnostic assistance, clinical decision support, medical coding, and billing, as well as software engineering, testing and user data safety and security. In this review we briefly discuss some associated issues, such as trust, veracity, clinical safety and reliability, privacy and opportunities, e.g., AI-driven conversational user interfaces for friendlier human-computer interaction
Article
This study investigates the dynamic evolution of coopetition between giant entrants from different industries and incumbent leaders, and the role of coopetition in industry leadership battles in a convergent segment. We analyse the case of coopetition between Apple and Samsung in the smartphone industry, taking both a broad perspective and a more focused approach. Our findings suggest that in convergent situations, innovative leaders from other industries are likely to enter newly convergent segments and coopetition between giant entrants and incumbents plays an important role in the industry leadership battles. Also, from the dynamic perspective, the cooperative relationships between giant entrants and incumbents can change to coopetition over time. Thus, the way to value creation will change across the stages of the coopetition and balance is critical for the continuation of a coopetitive relationship.
Article
First Page of the Article
Microsoft Announces ChatGPT Capabilities Coming To Bing
  • Sej
  • Seo
SEJ ⋅ SEO (2023), Microsoft Announces ChatGPT Capabilities Coming To Bing, SEARCH ENGINE JOURNAL, Access from, https://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-announceschatgpt-capabilities-coming-to-bing/478803/#close
Go like hell: Ford, Ferrari, and their battle for speed and glory at Le Mans
  • A J Baime
Baime, A. J. (2009). Go like hell: Ford, Ferrari, and their battle for speed and glory at Le Mans. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
How Google's LaMDA AI works, and why it seems so much smarter than it is, Android Police, Access from
  • Byryne Hager
Byryne Hager (2022), How Google's LaMDA AI works, and why it seems so much smarter than it is, Android Police, Access from, https://www.androidpolice.com/what-is-google-lamda/
Google AI's LaMDA Vs OpenAI's ChatGPT, Marketpost, Access from
  • S S Dhanshree
Dhanshree S.S. (2023, January, 03), Google AI's LaMDA Vs OpenAI's ChatGPT, Marketpost, Access from, https://www.marktechpost.com/2023/01/03/google-ais-lamda-vsopenais-chatgpt/
Google unveils ChatGPT rival Bard, AI search plans in battle with Microsoft
  • Reuters
Reuters (2023), Google unveils ChatGPT rival Bard, AI search plans in battle with Microsoft, The Business StandardAccess from, https://www.tbsnews.net/tech/google-unveils-chatgpt-rival-bardai-search-plans-battle-microsoft-581138