Conference Paper

The Enhanced Economics, Incentives, and Multinational Cooperation Enabled by Refueling Architectures Centered Around Debris Clusters for Sustainable Active Debris Removal

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

As Low Earth Orbit (LEO) sees ever increasing congestion, there has never been a more important time to find sustainable solutions to debris mitigation and removal. This debris congestion has far-reaching multinational effects and consequences that numerous bodies such as IADC, UNCOPUOS, and agencies worldwide have been working to mitigate. Although multiple active debris removal (ADR) missions have been proposed, they are often demonstrations that remove only a small portion of the overall debris mass and collision risk in orbit yet still require tremendous financial resources. The high mass and volume objects that pose the highest collision risk typically require highly-capable, large, expensive ADR vehicles with significant quantities of fuel to remove a single object, let alone multiple objects before fully depleting, which severely limits the number of missions each vehicle can perform before another is required. These fuel limits and costly capital replacements serve as major economic and feasibility challenges for comprehensive debris removal, which results in much of the funding and development of debris removal falling to a few single or multinational governmental parties. As debris is generated by and affects all space-faring nations, reducing these costs can better incentivise shared financial burden across them. The authors believe that a refueling architecture for ADR vehicles centered around each debris cluster is the key enabler to making this not only possible, but also economically sustainable. In previous studies by Orbit Fab, presented at the CNES Space Debris Modeling & Remediation Workshop, the highest risk objects, as defined by Dr. Darren McKnight, fall into 3 major delta-V clusters, where all objects are within a few hundred meters per seconds of each other: 1. inclination, 780-920km altitude, totalling ~100 tonnes across 50 objects 99. 0° ± 1. 0° 2. inclination, 840-950km altitude, totalling ~300 tonnes across 210 objects 82. 0° ± 1. 0° 3. inclination, 750-1500km altitude, totalling ~400 tonnes across 185 objects 72. 5° ± 1. 5° Together, the 445 objects within these clusters make up over 50% of the debris mass in orbit while representing less than 2.5% of the total amount of debris objects. This makes a strong case for developing refueling architectures to maximize accessibility with minimum fuel expenditure and effectively unlimited fuel availability for vehicles to perform multiple missions, thus dramatically reducing debris removal costs at economies of scale, which this paper will explore. A high-level legal framework required to achieve this debris removal at this scale will also be examined to understand the associated cost breakdowns and incentives for different parties globally to contribute to a safer, more sustainable space.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... All of this depends on the availability of plentiful supplies of propellants which will remove the significant constraints placed on current space operations by limited delta-V budgets, enabling life extension, reuse, dynamic retasking of assets, and new mission concepts and business models. Including refueling in mission plans has also been shown to reduce total implementation costs for a variety of mission scenarios [1] [2]. Widespread availability of fuel in space is critical for scaling up and enabling the next generation of space activities in a sustainable and scalable manner. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Orbit Fab is developing a dedicated Mission Operations Center (MOC) in Colorado, USA in order to support the next generation of Refueling and Satellite Servicing Missions for commercial and government customers and service providers. Mission Operations Centers have historically been designed around individual Earth Observation (EO) or Communications spacecraft operations; recently, these systems have been modified for operating large constellations. Further modifications to traditional MOCs will be needed to support the growing in-orbit servicing ecosystem and enable the next generation of missions which are designed around the utilization of these services. While In-space Servicing Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM) MOCs can benefit from the advances in automation that have come from constellation operations, new challenges also arise. ISAM missions differ from most commercial missions in their risk, operational cadence, and reliance on onboard automated control. In planning the four main components of satellite operations: the team, their procedures, software tools, and ground station communications, Orbit Fab has found that current methods bias heavily towards the EO and Comms use cases. This paper will explore key areas where Mission Operations needs to be designed uniquely for spacecraft expected to participate in ISAM, especially those whose primary mission involves repeated Proximity Operations and Docking-Undocking (POD-U). These areas include data sharing and collaboration with the client vehicle operations center, negotiating use of Ground Stations as a Service for close-to-continuous comms during POD-U while operating under other system constraints, dispersing the information necessary for other operators to steer clear of POD-U operations without requiring additional tools or analysis on their end, and developing operator views and tools that allow them to analyze and react to events at a rate commensurate with the dynamics of autonomous docking. Orbit Fab will seek out the best solutions to overcome these challenges in the process of developing their MOC to fly the Podracer mission and their future fleet of depots and shuttles. Podracer will launch in early 2024 and will serve as an orbital testbed for Orbit Fab's POD-U hardware, software, and operations.
... If clients can be clustered within several degrees of inclination of each other, the satellite servicing vehicles augmented by refueling, can be capable of serving them all without needing to launch more assets or rely upon dedicated launch option at very high costs for more exotic orbits. These trends are explored in detail in previous work by the authors presented at IAC 2022 titled 'The Enhanced Economics, Incentives, and Multinational Cooperation Enabled by Refueling Architectures Centered Around Debris Clusters for Sustainable Active Debris Removal' [12] exploring the cost benefit analysis of ΔV clustering debris removal targets with a comprehensive refueling constellation. While this analysis focuses on ADR missions, it is easily extensible to many other ISAM missions as they follow a similar conops where they must match orbits with a client object, complete rendezvous and proximity operations, expend some ΔV in the servicing process, and the move to the next client. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Satellite mission lifetimes are often constrained by the amount of fuel carried by the satellite at launch. The amount of fuel needed for a mission is typically carefully calculated during mission planning to enable completion of planned operations for a nominal lifetime. This approach means that using fuel at a higher rate than initially planned to retask an asset or recover from off-nominal scenarios directly reduces mission lifetime; in practice this results in retasking or pursuing new operational opportunities being costly and rarely worthwhile for commercial and government operators. In-space refueling has the potential to remove this barrier and give spacecraft operators the opportunity to maneuver without regret to retask assets and engage in unplanned operations. This paper presents several case studies of opportunities for retasking spacecraft and/or changing their operational mission profile. The case studies considered include relocation of GEO communications satellites between slots, reconfiguration of a LEO observation or communication constellation to provide additional coverage over an area of emergent interest, and relocation of satellite servicing vehicles between operational orbit regimes. For each case study, the feasibility with and without refueling is assessed and the technical and financial gains offered by refueling are quantified. The paper also presents an overview of the refueling technologies that Orbit Fab is developing to help enable refueling missions which will expand the operational capabilities and retasking options for satellite operators.
Article
Much attention has been paid recently to the issue of removing human-generated space debris from Earth orbit, especially following conclusions reached by both NASA and ESA that mitigating debris is not sufficient, that debris-on-debris and debris-on-active-satellite collisions will continue to generate new debris even without additional launches, and that some sort of active debris removal (ADR) is needed. Several techniques for ADR are technically plausible enough to merit further research and eventually operational testing. However, all ADR technologies present significant legal and policy challenges which will need to be addressed for debris removal to become viable. This paper summarizes the most promising techniques for removing space debris in both LEO and GEO, including electrodynamic tethers and ground- and space-based lasers. It then discusses several of the legal and policy challenges posed, including: lack of separate legal definitions for functional operational spacecraft and non-functional space debris; lack of international consensus on which types of space debris objects should be removed; sovereignty issues related to who is legally authorized to remove pieces of space debris; the need for transparency and confidence-building measures to reduce misperceptions of ADR as anti-satellite weapons; and intellectual property rights and liability with regard to ADR operations. Significant work on these issues must take place in parallel to the technical research and development of ADR techniques, and debris removal needs to be done in an environment of international collaboration and cooperation.
IADC space debris mitigation guidelines
IADC, IADC space debris mitigation guidelines, March 2020, https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/library/iadc-spac e-debris-guidelines-revision-2.pdf, (accessed 02.09.22)
Astroscale receives ESA funding for 2024 ELSA-M debris removal mission, Via Satellite
  • R Jewett
Jewett, R, Astroscale receives ESA funding for 2024 ELSA-M debris removal mission, Via Satellite, 27 May 2022, https://www.satellitetoday.com/in-space-services/2
ESA partners with startup to launch First Debris Removal Mission in 2025
  • S Mathewson
Mathewson, S, ESA partners with startup to launch First Debris Removal Mission in 2025, Space.com, 16 May 2021, https://www.space.com/esa-startup-clearspace-deb ris-removal-2025, (accessed 02.09.22)
Commercial removal of debris demonstration
  • Jaxa Research
  • Development Directorate
JAXA Research and Development Directorate, Commercial removal of debris demonstration, n.d., https://www.kenkai.jaxa.jp/eng/research/crd2/crd2 .html, (accessed 02.09.22)
Force selects 125 industry proposals for on-orbit servicing technologies
  • S Erwin
  • Space
Erwin, S,. Space Force selects 125 industry proposals for on-orbit servicing technologies, SpaceNews, 2 May 2022, https://spacenews.com/space-force-selects-125-in dustry-proposals-for-on-orbit-servicing-technologi es/, (accessed 02.09.22)
Regulating the space commons: Treating space debris as abandoned property in violation of the outer space treaty
  • C Muñoz-Patchen
Muñoz-Patchen, C, Regulating the space commons: Treating space debris as abandoned property in violation of the outer space treaty, Chicago Journal of International Law, 19, 233, 2019.