Article

CILFIT Criteria for the Acte Clair/Acte Éclairé Doctrine in Direct Tax Cases of the CJEU

January 2012
Intertax 40(Issue 12):654-665

DOI:10.54648/TAXI2012068

Authors:

In the Da Costa and CILFIT decisions, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) developed what is known as the acte éclairé and the acte clair doctrine which sets the criteria when the national courts are not obliged to make a preliminary reference to the CJEU about the matter of interpretation of EU law. These criteria were often criticized in the literature, especially their application in the field of direct taxes. This article represents a critical overview of this doctrine and proposes a new criterion for the classification of preliminary questions primarily concerning direct taxation.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Chapter

Slovenia

October 2012

Nana Šumrada

While there is no Slovenian GAAR, the Tax Procedure Act contains a general rule indicating that tax avoidance is not effective to defeat the tax liability ordinarily due. This provision is applied by the tax administrator on a case-by-case basis. In addition, anti-avoidance case law from the European Court of Justice furnishes some guidance for addressing artificial tax arrangements. These rules ... [Show full abstract] have been implemented by incorporation of EU directives into domestic law. Double taxation conventions between Slovenia and other countries incorporate anti-abuse principles.

Article

Full-text available

Indirect Taxation of Events Beyond the Control of the Taxpayer in Crucial Tax and Customs Judgements...

December 2021 · Comparative Law Review

Krzysztof Lasiński-Sulecki

Indirect taxes are shaped in such a way that the final customers bear their economic burden. The scope of taxation is usually delineated to cover all goods (and services) reaching the afore-mentioned final consumers. One may assume that the aim of a lawmaker is that goods (or services) supplied to the consumers should not remain untaxed. However, the intensity of pursuing this aim differs between ... [Show full abstract] VAT, excise duties, and customs duties. A scientific question that the rules outlined above bring about is whether it is acceptable – under the general principles of the European Union law perceived through a number of tax (customs) cases – to impose duties on a person or to deprive a taxpayer of rights owing to tax-relevant facts that have been entirely out of the control of this person or this taxpayer (customs debtor). Although the position of the Court of Justice towards this issue is not homogenous, the author of this article claims that situations that are wholly beyond the scope of control of a diligent person should not affect the tax (customs) situation to the detriment of such a person.

Article

Taxation of Cross-Border Dividends in the European Union from Past to Future

April 2010 · EC Tax Review

Mario Tenore

The article aims at achieving consistency in the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the taxation of dividends from the perspective of the Home State and that of the Host State. Based on the assumption that EU Member States are obliged to ensure the neutrality with regard to inbound dividends and outbound dividends, the author demonstrates that schedular tax systems are nowadays ... [Show full abstract] the ones that comply with EU Law while keeping its effective exercise of national taxing rights upon dividends. The article also deals with the application of the pan-European approach (also known as ‘overall approach’), which, in the author’s view, is by far the most controversial current issue in relation to the taxation of dividends. The ECJ in Commission v. Italy correctly limited the application of the pan-European approach though without entirely removing the uncertainties that derive from its application to the taxation of cross-border dividends.

Article

Full-text available

Exchange of information in the field of direct taxation in the European Union Law and in the practic...

January 2014 · Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Novi Sad

Cvjetana Cvjetkovic

This paper is dedicated to one form of mutual assistance in tax matters in the field of direct taxation - the exchange of information which in terms of the functioning of the single market of the European Union is gaining more importance. This paper also presents new solutions of Directive 2011/16/EU. Special attention in this paper is focused on the practice of the European Court of Justice in ... [Show full abstract] the area of the exchange of information.

Article

International Cooperation to Avoid Double Taxation in the Field of VAT: Does the Court of Justice Pr...

June 2016 · EC Tax Review

Ilse De Troyer

The EU Court of Justice recently confirmed that EU Member States have a duty to cooperate to help ensure that Value Added Tax (VAT) is correctly assessed. In the Court’s view, this implies that they have to exchange information whenever a request for information may prove expedient, or even necessary for determining where the VAT is due. This judgment deviates from former case law. It may ... [Show full abstract] considerably affect the rights of taxable persons facing a double VAT taxation of their transactions. This article provides an overview of (possible) implications of this judgment.

Article

HYDINA SK. Suspension of the Tax Audit in case of Exchange of Information. Court of Justice, Highlig...

December 2021

Giorgio Beretta

Article

On the Liability of the Uninformed Taxable Person in EU VAT

July 2019 · Intertax

Frank J.G. Nellen

In this contribution, the author analyses the information need of the taxable person in EU value added tax (VAT). He explores the extent to which the taxable person depends, in the course of taxation, on the provision of information that is held by others. In addition, the author discusses EU Court of Justice (ECJ) case law in order to establish whether the taxable person can be held liable for ... [Show full abstract] the payment of VAT in case that person is unable to obtain all necessary information.

Preprint

Full-text available

Beggars can’t be choosers, or can they? Turnover taxes, the fight for the national tax base and the...

May 2021

The taxation of corporate turnover has emerged in the EU and its Member States as part of efforts to secure the national tax base and to enable a fair and equitable distribution of the tax burden among corporate taxpayers covered by the national tax jurisdiction. It enables the exercise of the taxation prerogative over value generated in the national analogue and digital economy when traditional ... [Show full abstract] corporate income taxation seems to fail in achieving the same. However, the introduction of turnover taxation is problematic from a legal perspective and its legitimacy is contestable as a matter of both EU and national law. After years of contestation before the European Commission and the courts of the EU, it has been clarified that EU law is not available to address the central issues involved in the regulation of turnover taxes. As the law now stands, there is a possibility that in this area of taxation Member States can get away with misrepresenting their policy intentions and abusing their taxing rights in this way.

Article

Means to combat tax evasion in the European Union

May 2010

Alia Gabriela DUTA

Invoking the law in an abusive manner can aim to avoid the provisions of national law rather than illegitimate gains or wholly contrary to EU legislation. We know that if direct taxation jurisdiction of Member States, the European Court of Justice required that the exercise of those powers to be in conformity with Community law, in particular with the Treaty on freedom of movement.

Article

The Internal Market versus the Right of Member States to Levy Direct Tax-A Clash of Fundamental Prin...

January 2013 · Intertax

Sylvia Elwes

The EU treaties do not give specific powers to the Council to pass laws on direct tax. Nevertheless, the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU formerly ECJ) has been carrying out the negative integration of tax laws. On preliminary reference applications, the court has interpreted the treaty articles about the Internal Market in such a way as to adversely affect national tax laws. A ... [Show full abstract] Member State which does not amend or repeal a national tax provision which breaches an Internal Market article is in breach of an EU treaty obligation and can be brought before the CJEU by the Commission. This article shows how individual taxpayers have avoided paying tax by pleading before a national court that the law under which they are being taxed conflicts with EU law. The author argues that the present situation is unsatisfactory, and recommends changes that could be made to the Treaties to regularize the situation.

Article

National Tax Law Presumptions and EU Law

August 2014 · EC Tax Review

Claudia Sanò

Legal presumptions serve essential and legitimate needs in national legal orders, where they are introduced for the purpose of simplifying the assessment and the recovery of tax or for tackling tax avoidance or evasion. Nowadays, however, the national choices concerning the use of tax law presumptions must be tested against European Union (EU) law, both in uniform or harmonized sectors and, ... [Show full abstract] albeit to a different extent, in non-harmonized ones. In this article, after a brief discussion of the meaning and relevance of the concept on the basis of national juridical traditions, the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concerning the repayment of taxes unduly levied is analysed, so as to highlight the core scheme adopted when it evaluates the national tax law presumption's compatibility with EU law. Afterwards, an examination of the most relevant CJEU case law on legal presumptions in different tax matters (customs law, VAT, direct taxation) is carried out. This, with a view to catching some interpretative trends peculiar to specific domains of taxation which should guide national legislators. Finally, some general conclusions are developed on the overall approach to national tax law presumptions in the context of EU law, with an eye to national experiences.

Article

Turnover Taxes, the Fight for the National Tax Base and the EU Court of Justice: An Undeserved Trium...

November 2021 · Legal Issues of Economic Integration

The additional taxation of corporate turnover has emerged in the EU Member States and at the EU level as part of efforts to secure the national tax base and presumably to enable a fair and equitable sharing of the tax burden among corporate taxpayers covered by the national tax jurisdiction. Its introduction is usually based on the expectation that such taxation enables the exercise of taxing ... [Show full abstract] rights over value generated in the national analogue and digital economy when the traditional taxation of corporate income seems to fail in achieving the same. However, turnover taxes are problematic tax instruments from a legal perspective and their lawfulness is debatable as a matter of both EU and national law. After years of contestation before the European Commission and the courts of the EU based on EU internal market and State aid law, it has been revealed that EU law is not available to challenge some of the fundamental problems with the regulation of turnover taxes. As the law now stands, there is a possibility that in this area of taxation Member States can get away with misrepresenting their intentions and abusing their taxing rights in this way. This latter issue must not be overlooked when addressing the non- or under-taxation of corporate taxpayers in the national and the European economy.