ArticlePDF Available

Project Failure: A Bad Communication (Case Study)

Authors:
  • Maldives Transport and Contracting Company Plc

Abstract

The most common cause of project failure is miscommunication. It is most underrated and purposefully not deeply planned by most of the contractors, like Sujata, who become confused when changes and updates are not communicated correctly and on time. This ambiguity leads to errors, missed steps in the process, conflicts, and other problems. All these scenarios impacted the project, resulting in delays or budget overruns in the end. In this case, multiple stakeholder communications and changes in client requirements caused the project to fail and updates are not communicated correctly and on time. This ambiguity leads to errors, missed steps in the process, conflicts, and other issues. All these scenarios will result in delays or budget overruns in the end. In this case, multiple stakeholder communications and changes in client requirements caused the project to fail. As a result, internal conflicts will arise, with teams blaming each other for inefficiencies and poor deliverables. This case also entails the importance of stakeholder engagement at different levels of the project and the strategy to be implemented for stakeholder management. The goal of this case study is to draw attention to the difficulties that arise when small and medium-sized businesses fail to recognize the value of communication management in stakeholder engagement, which provided them success but were unable to account for the losses they suffered. This will enable them to account for the costs associated with change management involving stakeholder engagement.
International Journal of Management and Humanities (IJMH)
ISSN: 2394-0913 (Online), Volume-9 Issue-5, January 2023
5
Retrieval Number: 100.1/ijmh.E1553019523
DOI: 10.35940/ijmh.E1553.019523
Journal Website: www.ijmh.org
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication (BEIESP)
© Copyright: All rights reserved.
Abstract: The most common cause of project failure is
miscommunication. It is most underrated and purposefully not
deeply planned by most of the contractors, like Sujata, who
become confused when changes and updates are not
communicated correctly and on time. This ambiguity leads to
errors, missed steps in the process, conflicts, and other problems.
All these scenarios impacted the project, resulting in delays or
budget overruns in the end. In this case, multiple stakeholder
communications and changes in client requirements caused the
project to fail and updates are not communicated correctly and on
time. This ambiguity leads to errors, missed steps in the process,
conflicts, and other issues. All these scenarios will result in delays
or budget overruns in the end. In this case, multiple stakeholder
communications and changes in client requirements caused the
project to fail. As a result, internal conflicts will arise, with teams
blaming each other for inefficiencies and poor deliverables. This
case also entails the importance of stakeholder engagement at
different levels of the project and the strategy to be implemented
for stakeholder management. The goal of this case study is to draw
attention to the difficulties that arise when small and
medium-sized businesses fail to recognize the value of
communication management in stakeholder engagement, which
provided them success but were unable to account for the losses
they suffered. This will enable them to account for the costs
associated with change management involving stakeholder
engagement.
Keywords: Communication Management, Failure in Success,
Interior Project, Project Management.
I. INTRODUCTION
Sujata Kalpade, a project manager at Adhan Bharat LLP,
was disenchanted on June 3, 2022, after hearing from the site
supervisor about the delivered light of a fit-out project.
Chuliars India (CI), a Singapore-based company, was chosen
as the general contractor by Udhar Swiss (US), a
foreign-based bank (NBFC), to develop the new office fit-out
project as part of their expansion plan. Further, GC has
awarded Adhan Bharat LLP (ABL) a civil and interior
package for a fit-out project with a total value of INR 24
million.
Sujata required a robust solution to the problem; however,
the lights being delivered are not ABL's responsibility;
however, they provide SK with a sense of pride in timely
completion and enhance ABL's reputation. Meanwhile,
Deepak Arora, the US representative, is equally concerned
about the timely completion of the US office, given the
Manuscript received on 02 December 2022 | Revised
Manuscript received on 17 December 2022 | Manuscript
Accepted on 15 January 2023 | Manuscript published on 30
January 2023.
* Correspondence Author(s)
Sahil Kumar Arora*, Project Manager, Special Construction Division,
MTCC, Maldives. Email: sahilkarora065@gmail.com, ORCID ID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5293-9798
© The Authors. Published by Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and
Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the
CC-BY-NC-ND license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
upcoming visit from foreign delights. A critical component of
the project is the new regional office, which must be
developed and handed over to the business operations unit by
July 7, 2022. (EOT approved)
This new office is part of an expansion plan for the US in
India, as this would boost their operational occupancy and
also provide an easy commute to the top officials as the
location is nearer to International Airport, Delhi.
The US (the client) had awarded the project to CI as the
lowest bidder for the general contract work. MEP services,
LV services, data and networking, and civil and interior
works are all included in the INR 58 million total. The US
also appointed Jalandhar Laung Elaichi (JLE), India, an
America-based company, as a PMC for the project. The
architect and consultant were chosen as partners by the US in
a separate contract to execute all projects in India. The client
has also appointed its AV vendor.
According to the tender terms and conditions, the project
must be developed and handed over to the client within three
months of the construction phase contract being awarded.
The PMC is the entity in charge of coordinating between the
architect, consultants, and client and is authorized to
represent the client in providing quality and timely project
completion.
The Similar Nature project was completed earlier in Pune,
India, for the US, where the JLE, consultants, and architects
were the same. The client wants the project to be LEED
certified with a platinum rating.
II.
CONTRACT
DIVERSITY
The packages have also been sublet by the general contractor
Iluminate Electricals as the electrical vendor partner.
Saaf Air is the HVAC partner.
Liram as the LV partner.
ABL is the C&I and PFF (plumbing and firefighting
partner).
Armer is the carpet partner.
Kimra was named loose furniture partner, and Layvord
was named modular furniture partner.
The Plumbing consultants, electrical consultants,
mechanical consultants, and cost consultants based in
Mumbai have been appointed.
A. Abbreviations and Acronyms
LV: Low Voltage Works, C&I: Civil and Interior Works,
HVAC: Hydraulic Ventilation and Air Conditioning, PFF:
Plumbing and Fire Fighting Works, NBFC stands for
Non-Banking Financial Company. General Contractor;
PMC: Project Management Consultancy; MEP: Mechanical,
Electrical, and Plumbing Services; LVT: Luxury Vinyl Tile;
EOT: Extension of Time.
Project Failure: A Bad Communication (Case Study)
Sahil Kumar Arora
Project Failure: A Bad Communication (Case Study)
6
Retrieval Number: 100.1/ijmh.E1553019523
DOI: 10.35940/ijmh.E1553.019523
Journal Website: www.ijmh.org
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication (BEIESP)
© Copyright: All rights reserved.
B. Communication Plan
The meeting for project progress between the GC,
PMC, and client is held once a week to monitor the
progress of the project.
The meeting for design augmentation between the
GC, PMC, client, architect, and consultants of the
project occurs at a frequency of once a week.
The site update meeting between GC and its affiliate
partners, as well as PMC, takes place once a week.
Issues related to meetings between the architect,
consultants, GC and its affiliate partner, and PMC as
per the requirements previously informed
ABL and similar affiliates are not allowed to
communicate directly with JLE, consultants, or the
architect.
They can communicate all their queries to CI, which
can further discuss them with other stakeholders and
provide the answer similarly.
C. Project Planning and its Features
The project is planned for a three-month duration. The total
area of the project is 5000 sq ft (464.52 m2). The area
comprises three critical rooms: two 6-person meeting rooms,
an 18-person boardroom, two senior manager cabins, one
finance room, two other rooms, one store, one cafeteria, one
washroom, and one hall to accommodate 20 workstations.
The project consists of Italian marble flooring, LVT, carpet,
acoustic paint on the ceiling, rafter ceilings, baffle ceilings,
and gypsum ceilings. Grid ceilings, modular partitions,
gypsum partitions, block works, texture paint, wallpaper,
graphics, and signage.
III. PROJECT EXECUTION AND CHALLENGES
Sujata and Changez Gupta, a project manager from
Chuliars India, visited the site for due diligence on March
16th and discovered that the existing floors were not levelled,
which could cause a quality issue later with the carpet
installation. The floor where the marble flooring will be
installed must be removed in any case. Sujata requested that
Changez provide her with the necessary approval for the
complete floor dismantling after noticing the quality issue.
Later, on March 20, 2022, Changez received approval and
gave Sujata permission to perform the dismantling work.
While the dismantling work appears to be done to achieve
high quality, it later proves to be a nightmare for all
stakeholders.
The work can only be done at night to avoid disrupting the
work of other tenants during official working hours. The
previous night's work had been halted because the developer
had rented the adjacent, similar space to a company that
operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
This issue was discussed further, and an agreement was
reached to work at night from 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM, Monday
through Friday, with 24x7 weekend coverage until Monday
6:00 AM. This knowledge modified Sujata's plan, which she
must revise following approved timelines.
On March 26th, 2022, the project site was dismantled and
cleared. Site marking was carried out according to the
drawings received, and it was discovered that there was a
difference between the drawing and the actual site
dimensions. Sujata highlighted this to the GC, who brought it
up with the PMC, who relayed it to the architect, who
informed the client of the discrepancies. Another three days
passed in vain, with no word from Sujata on how to begin the
work. Fortunately, another ABL site is on the upper floor to
accommodate the labour's idle time.
The proposed alterations by the architect were authorized
on March 30, 2022, following input from JLE's top
management. Because ABL is not directly bound to the
project's primary stakeholders, Sujata advised a direct
connection with the architect after seeing how much time was
being lost in this process. However, this suggestion broke the
contract for the project.
The client purposefully opposed her request because,
according to the contracts, ABL has no right to communicate
directly with the project stakeholders appointed by the client.
She issued an RFQ, requesting that the queries be forwarded
to the GC in the hopes that they would be resolved in time for
the project to proceed smoothly.
Sujata was informed of a change in drawings on April 17,
2022, and some drawings were kept as originals. Sujata
requested that the GC provide the consolidated drawing set
for the latest drawings. The team was unsure which drawing
to follow, and she was unsure because she had never attended
the regular weekly design meeting with the GC, PMC,
architects, consultants, and clients.
On April 20th, 2022, a new challenge appeared as the
building was very old and the floor height above the slab
bottom was 2900 mm as per the drawings. Work is being
done to raise the ceiling to 2400 mm. This turned out to be
another communication problem, as the HVAC drawings
suggested a ceiling height of 2300 mm, which was duly
approved by the consultant. No change is being made to the
interior drawings, and no information is being shared with
Sujata. This halted the work for nearly ten days, and on May
3, 2022, the revised ceiling heights of 2350 mm and 2200 mm
were received.
Sujata was just happy enough to realize that the EID
festival had become more of an issue for her, causing further
delays in bringing the labour. On May 8th, she received her
planned labour, and a revised completion date of June 30th
was requested, highlighting the issues being recorded and
approved by the clients.
Sujata received the revised consolidated drawing on May
17, 2022, following a long battle. On May 20, 2022, after a
client visit and a follow-up visit from the architect, the
drawings were revised again, and the changes were
communicated informally.
The battle for consolidated drawings has resumed, and a
meeting has been scheduled for June 3rd, 2022, to resolve the
issues that highlight two 6-pax meeting rooms that should be
identical, resulting in rework. Sujata also demanded that AV
vendors visit the site before she began the final stages of the
project. The AV vendor recently visited and suggested some
additional changes.
The client of a foreign delight visiting the office declared a
deadline; the ultimate due date was July 7, 2022. All required
clearances were received.
International Journal of Management and Humanities (IJMH)
ISSN: 2394-0913 (Online), Volume-9 Issue-5, January 2023
7
Retrieval Number: 100.1/ijmh.E1553019523
DOI: 10.35940/ijmh.E1553.019523
Journal Website: www.ijmh.org
Published By:
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering
& Sciences Publication (BEIESP)
© Copyright: All rights reserved.
When the major lights failed to arrive in time for the
three-day visit on July 3, 2022, the lights were delivered as
hanging lights with clutch wire arrangements, and the
challenge was figuring out how to install the lights. The
ceiling was designed specifically to receive the concealed
linear lights in the cabins.
Sujata had previously highlighted the same for
cross-checking with the light supplier, but the supplier never
visited. To accommodate the lights, the entire ceiling had to
be dismantled and rebuilt.
The general contractor was aware that the electrical
consultant had previously authorized the lighting plans, but
neither the architect nor the C&I vendor had been informed.
IV. OBSERVATION
Sujata deployed more staff and teams to work 24 hours a
day, seven days a week, for the next three days, and the site
visit became a success [4]. The above scenario is apparent
since the client failed to properly communicate his
requirements to the architect. [5] As a coordinator, the PMC
failed miserably. [1] The company erred in communicating
the change to the affiliate member. [2] If Sujata's request to
directly contact the stakeholders had been granted, the story
might have turned out differently. [3]
It also raises the question of how this type of diversity can
harm the project; what do you recommend?
V. CONCLUSION
The communication channel must be properly designed at the
beginning of the project. The preceding scenario
demonstrates the significance of stakeholder involvement.
Multi-level communication like including the subcontractor
in the design-related meeting will not only aid in
subcontractor planning but will also provide significant
progress and serve as a useful tool in the accurate assessment
of the project's impacts because of changing the design
mid-project. Additionally, the levels of attention and
impactboth actual and desiredof various stakeholders
will vary. The sunk cost related to stakeholder engagement
can be decreased, and the client will be able to manage the
expense.
DECLARATION
Funding
Conflicts of Interest/
Competing Interests
Ethics Approval
Consent to Participate
Consent for
Publication
Availability of Data
and Material
Authors
Contributions
Code Availability
REFERENCES
1. Atul R Nikumbh, D. S. (Jan, 2014). Role of Project Management
Consultancy in Construction. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil
Engineering (IOSR-JMCE). [CrossRef]
2. Elias Defalgn Debelo, Z. B. (2022). Effect of Contractor
Subcontractor Relationship on the Performance of Construction
Project: A Case Study of Dire Dawa Construction Projects. American
Journal of Civil Engineering. [CrossRef]
3. Hongyan Li, J. F. (vol. 2021). "Collaborative Evolution Mechanism
of PMC Project Organizational Management System from the
Perspective of Organizational Conflict". Mathematical Problems in
Engineering,. [CrossRef]
4. Institute, P. M. (2008). A guide to the project management body of
knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (Fourth ed.). Project Management
Institute.
5. Udo, N. (2009). Starting right: establishing requirements. Paper
presented at PMI® Global Congress.
AUTHORS PROFILE
Sahil Kumar Arora, Education: PGP ACM from
NICMAR (2020 batch), B.E.-Civil Engineering.
Project Manager, Special Construction Division,
Maldives Transport and Contracting Company plc,
Maldives. He was born in Saharanpur and plays district
cricket. He also has an interest in singing. He graduated
in 2016 from AKTU (formerly UPTU). Later, he began
working in the construction industry. Before joining the Nicmar, he worked
as a project engineer in Nepal for an ADB-funded project. The post-graduate
experience instilled in me the ability to write and a keen interest in research
publication. He got placed in an interior design project, and during those
times, the idea stuck in his mind to write this case study when he was in a
similar project and experiencing the same challenges.
... In fact, miscommunication among engineers mostly has disastrous effects on the efficiency and accuracy of achieving projects. The ambiguity and the lack of coordination among engineers lead to missed steps, problems and conflicts that usually end with delays and budget overruns [21]. The construction industry needs effective communication management between the different stakeholders. ...
Article
English language has become the established language for academic communication, the international language for science and technology and the most reputable journals in engineering publish mainly in English language. This study investigates the English language speaking and writing functions needed by postgraduate engineers in Saudi Arabia upon joining the labor market. To this end, the researcher selected fifty experienced engineers from different engineering companies in Jeddah. The researcher prepared a few questions related to the communications needs in English language that post graduate students usually find important while dealing with other multi-nationality engineers. He also built a questionnaire for the same purpose. The findings of the study revealed that there is agreement that speaking and writing functions in English language are unavoidable and an engineer unable to communicate orally and in writing in English language is considered illiterate. This study found an urgent need for a syllabus as a remedial procedure to train fresh graduate engineers on enhancing their competence in speaking and writing in English language.
... Consequently, many risks go unidentified due to inadequate communication. Without open communication among stakeholders, conflicts may arise in risk selection, leading to inaccurate risk assessments [72]. Disruptions in team communication can also delay conveying information about emerging risks, rendering applied mitigation strategies ineffective [73]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Risk management in the software development lifecycle (SDLC) is a continuous process that addresses risks throughout a system's lifecycle, including acquisition, development, maintenance, or operation. Despite its importance, ineffective risk management practices can lead to project failures, impacting organizations financially and reputationally. Therefore, there is a need for a systematic understanding of risk management practices in SDLC. This study conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) related to risk management activities performed by previous research during the SDLC. The SLR method combines Kitchenham with the toll-gate method to select literature for use. This SLR aims to investigate activities in traditional waterfall and agile development processes, which will be mapped into risk management activities in SDLC according to ISO 16085:202. Additionally, the review highlights the challenges encountered in implementing risk management in the SDLC process, including project complexity, adherence to policies and standards, lack of communication, lack of resources, and organizational culture.
... Leaving the comfort zone is a real challenge for many people. People do not want change in the company for the following reasons (Arora, 2023): no proper information transfer (if they do not understand the process and the effects), not being able to (if they are confronted with new systems and are afraid that they will not be able to cope with them), not wanting to (those who have a lot to lose certainly do not make the changes with a good heart). The change manager must understand how to overcome these barriers. ...
Article
The present paper reveals a qualitative exploratory study of change management processes in either reorganization measures or system changes in German companies. The empirical endeavor deals with the content analysis of four descriptive case studies in the field of change management, built with and promoted for instructional purposes. Our results may serve as incentives for change management practitioners (i.e., change agents, project managers, coaches, and trainers) and scholars aiming the change management field of study and its related disciplines. We thus, encourage firstly, (1) the use of instructional case studies while teaching and learning about change and secondly, (2) the intensification of qualitative research endeavors, which offer an in depth understanding of the organizational mechanisms and flows
... Implementations violate project privacy (Zhang et al., 2018b) (Arora, 2023). Utilization might differ in project cycle (Kanagarajoo et al., 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming a cornerstone in the evolution of project management. Its capabilities extend beyond simple automation, fostering improved decision-making processes and enhancing collaborative efforts. Among the various AI tools available, chatbots stand out as particularly transformative for project management. This study delves into the role of AI-powered chatbots in project stakeholder engagement, a critical aspect of successful project management. Chatbots, powered by sophisticated AI algorithms, can provide continuous support and interaction with project stakeholders. This is particularly vital in managing complex projects where continuous communication and prompt responses can significantly influence project success. The study examines how these AI-driven chatbots facilitate stakeholder engagement, focusing on key benefits such as improved communication, increased stakeholder satisfaction, and better overall project outcomes. Through a detailed analysis, we have identified that chatbots enhance communication by offering stakeholders immediate, personalized responses, thereby reducing response times and improving the efficiency of information exchange. This immediacy and personalization contribute to heightened stakeholder satisfaction, as stakeholders feel their concerns and queries are addressed promptly and effectively. Furthermore, our findings suggest that these improvements in stakeholder engagement directly correlate with enhanced project outcomes, including better adherence to timelines, improved project quality, and increased likelihood of meeting project objectives. However, the deployment of chatbots in project management is not without its challenges. One significant hurdle is the need for advanced natural language processing (NLP) capabilities. Effective chatbots must understand and process complex human language nuances to interact effectively with stakeholders. Another challenge observed is the potential for chatbots to become disruptive or annoying. This can occur when chatbots fail to provide relevant or accurate information, or when their interaction style does not align with stakeholder expectations. In conclusion, AI-powered chatbots hold substantial promise for revolutionizing stakeholder engagement in project management. While they present remarkable benefits in improving communication, stakeholder satisfaction, and project outcomes, there are challenges that need to be addressed. These include enhancing NLP capabilities and fine-tuning the interaction style of chatbots to suit diverse stakeholder groups. With these improvements, AI-powered chatbots could significantly contribute to the success of various projects, marking a new era in project management where AI plays a pivotal role in stakeholder engagement and overall project success.
Article
Full-text available
Because of the common practice of subletting construction work into smaller packages, subcontracting has become an attractive technique in the construction business. Effective subcontractor selection and monitoring reduce the problem while also determining the performance of construction firms. The engagement of a subcontractor in a building construction project results in relationships with the main contractor, which will influence the project's success. The purpose of this study was to look at how main contractors choose subcontractors and to analyze the effect of the main contractor-subcontractor relationship on project performance. This research used a descriptive survey method to look at the underlying characteristics that influence the relationship between the main contractor and subcontractors and their effect on the performance of construction projects. The findings of the study confirmed that most contractor depends on subcontractors for the execution of their work and therefore procurement and management of subcontractors highly affects the performance of the construction project. It was also discovered that the subcontractor often performs 20 percent to 50 percent of the work. Main contractors used subcontractors primarily to offer skilled labor, lower overhead expenses, and relieve work and financial burden on themselves. The major causes of issues between the main contractor and the subcontractor include the main contractor's delay in releasing payments, the subcontractor's shortage of trained personnel, and scheduling conflicts among the subcontractors on a given project. To eliminate antagonistic relationships, the study advises a trust-based cooperative partnership that incorporates subcontractors into a partnering strategy. Furthermore, for optimal construction project performance, simpler and complete subcontract documents would improve the interaction between the main contractor and the subcontractor.
Article
Full-text available
Limited by traditional construction project management ideas and systems, the implementation of the PMC model in China still has serious problems such as opposition and frequent conflicts. How to reveal the causes of organizational conflicts and explore the key mechanism of the implementation of the PMC model from the system perspective are urgent problems to be solved. Based on the idea of engineering system view, this paper abstracts the PMC project participants with self-organizing characteristics of the organizational management system, in which the internal structure is closely related, and defines the connotation of synergy and synergistic evolution of the PMC project organizational management system. Using the Cucker–Smale model to describe the group movement, the hierarchical system and the acceleration efficiency function of the project legal person’s free will are constructed, and the structure, movement, and development law of the system itself are emphasized to simulate the ordered evolution trend of PMC project organizational management system and reveal the intrinsic causes of conflicts in PMC project and the key mechanisms of the PMC model application. The results show that first, the intensity of information communication between PMC subjects has a significant positive contribution to the orderliness of the organizational management system; second, too much acceleration of the project legal person’s free will causes group chaos in the system, while too little slows down the group stabilization time, which has a negative impact on cost and schedule; third, the more the organizational structure of PMC contractors tends to the whole-process integrated control, the more it can drive the group to gather in an orderly manner and form a synergistic control mode combining self-organization and other organizations; and fourth, the implementation of the PMC model should focus on eliminating the traditional institutional and conceptual barriers, forming a project management model with integrated control of the whole process of the PMC project contractor and effective macro supervision of the project legal person. The research results of this paper revealed the intrinsic causes of conflicts in PMC projects and the key mechanisms of PMC model application; it can help solve the confrontational situation of PMC project participants, promote the development of the PMC model, and give full play to the investment benefits. 1. Introduction China’s construction industry is a pillar industry of the national economy and has driven a large number of related industries, making important contributions to economic and social development, urban and rural construction, and improvement of people’s livelihood. About 3,424.7 billion yuan of investment in fixed assets for transportation and 770 billion yuan of investment in water conservancy were completed in 2020, and the large-scale, modern infrastructure, industrial, and civil building construction have demonstrated the advanced and reliable nature of China’s engineering technology, technical standards, and work methods. The “One Belt and One Road” initiative has been proposed for more than seven years and has won wide recognition from the international community. By the end of January 2021, China has signed 205 cooperation documents with 140 countries and 31 international organizations for the co-construction of “One Belt and One Road.” China’s construction industry has made remarkable achievements in the field of international engineering construction, but there is still a big gap compared with the construction industry of advanced industrialized countries; the construction labor productivity is only about two-thirds of that of developed countries; the construction industry is still big but not strong; the organization of engineering construction is backward; the level of architectural design needs to be improved; there are more market violations; the core competitiveness of enterprises is not strong; and other problems are more prominent. Under the influence of Chinese traditional thinking and traditional system, the organization and management of construction projects are still limited to the scope of project contracting business and split organization model [1]. In the traditional management model, the participants who are responsible for decision-making, construction, and operation services [2] provide services on behalf of the interests of the project legal person in the corresponding phase. Medium and large construction projects span civil, electrical, planning, environmental, and other functional departments to work together, and the connection between the participants is extensive and close and affects each other. As the project progresses, the relationship between participants changes dynamically, resulting in greater complexity of project organization and management. In addition, the different expertise and experience of each participant also increase the complexity of project coordination, which is more likely to cause problems such as confrontation and conflict among project participants. The high-quality development of the construction industry urgently needs to establish real good cooperation between all participants and improve the efficiency of organizational implementation [3]. Obviously, the traditional project management system, management style, and philosophy in China cannot meet to the needs of modern medium and large-scale project management. Engineering practice cases showed that the PMC model (project management contracting model) has the advantages of design optimization, integrated management, risk redistribution, and cost-saving compared with traditional DB and DBB models [4]. PMC model is an organizational model to meet the market demand and implement the whole process of engineering consulting in the project decision-making and construction implementation stages [5], mainly to provide high-quality intellectual and technical services for construction activities. PMC model refers to the engineering project management enterprise (PMC contractor), in accordance with the contract, preparing a feasibility study, feasibility analysis, and project planning for the owner at the decision-making stage; providing bidding agent, design management, procurement management, construction management, and commissioning (completion and acceptance) services for the owner at the implementation stage; and carrying out quality, safety, progress, cost, contract, and information management and control of the project on behalf of the owner. The PMC contractor shall generally bear certain management risks and economic responsibilities in accordance with the contract. Its essence is to provide high-quality whole-process intellectual and technical services for the project legal person. PMC project refers to the construction project that adopts the PMC model for the whole process integrated and professional organization and management. In February 2017, the Ministry of Housing and Construction issued document 19, the first time mentioned “whole process engineering consulting” concept, and in 2019, the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development jointly issued “Guidance on Promoting the Development of Full-Process Engineering Consulting Services” (Development and Reform Investment Regulations (2019) No. 515), which pointed out the urgent need to innovate the organization and implementation of consulting services and vigorously develop full-process engineering consulting service model oriented by market demand and meeting the diversified needs of commissioners. A series of construction project management-related regulations and practical applications have accumulated rich experience in promoting professional management of large-scale engineering project management [6]. PMC model is widely used in large-scale international project construction, for example, the South China Sea ethylene project undertaken by SINOPEC Engineering and Construction Corporation, the Bangladeshi Chittagong-Dhaka refined oil Pipeline Project undertaken by Langfang CNPC Langwei Engineering Project Management, the China-Myanmar Oil and Gas Pipeline Project undertaken by CNPC Pipeline Engineering Co., and so on [7]. The PMC model has become one of the important project management models in oil, transportation, water conservancy, and other industries [8]. The current research on the PMC model focuses on the theoretical definition and scope of the PMC model, risk study of the PMC model [9], schedule and cost control study [10], application practice study, and comparison study with other models [11]. Both domestic and foreign scholars have focused on the operational aspects of the PMC model, discussing how the PMC contractor conducts planning, design, and management scope of the PMC contractor, the risk of lump-sum contracts under unclear conditions, and institutional barriers to the promotion of the model. The research results of the PMC model have provided reference ideas for the professional management of construction projects [12], as an extension of the owner; the PMC contractor manages the whole process of project construction to achieve safe, high quality, low cost, and on-schedule completion of the project in accordance with the predetermined objectives and to optimize the technical and economic indicators over the life of the project. In the traditional project management model, the decision-making, implementation, and operation phases are independent, and the professional engineers who undertake the tasks of different phases provide consulting services for the owner in the corresponding phases, and the antagonism between the owner and the contractor is deep-rooted. Field research on PMC projects is implemented in China, due to the lack of systematic operation norms and references, and the influence of traditional construction project management ideas and systems; conflicts between PMC contractor and owner, supervisor, designer, and constructors are frequent in the project implementation Owners and PMC contractors do not trust each other; supervisor and designer and PMC contractor constrain each other in the implementation; and constructors do not recognize PMC contractor’s management. The PMC contractor is in an awkward position, and it is difficult to coordinate the relationship between all parties, and the confrontation and contradiction between the parties is intensifying as the project progresses. This is extremely mismatched with the current development demand of the construction industry; it is difficult to meet the needs of a high-quality development strategy [13]. It is urgent to introduce the system thought to explore the overall and integrated way of organization and coordination [14]. In view of this, the paper abstracts the PMC participants into an organizational management system with self-organizational characteristics from the perspective of system theory, using the Cucker–Smale group movement model, emphasizing the structure, movement, and development law of the system itself, highlighting the integrity and dynamics of the system operation, simulating the PMC participants of exchanging information and interacting with each other within the system, and identifying the underlying causes of organizational conflict among PMC project participants in the Chinese context, to facilitate in-depth study of the management mechanism of PMC projects. The paper explores the evolutionary mechanism and evolutionary dynamics of synergy formation in PMC project organizational management systems so that the PMC model can get rid of management dilemmas such as antagonistic participants, frequent conflicts, and low organizational efficiency; realize efficient collaboration among the participants, in order to promote the development of the PMC model in the field of Chinese construction project; and provide theoretical references for the revolution of the project management model. 2. Literature Review The existing collaborative studies of construction projects were mainly based on the relationship between the participants to construct the relationship network [15]. Dogan et al. used SNA to construct an e-mail communication network between the participants of a large airport construction project and calculated closeness centrality to evaluate project coordination performance [16]. Zhao et al. constructed an organizational network between participants based on e-mail log data from a $20 million AEC project to identify inconsistencies between organizational and collaborative networks, with the aim of analyzing the patterns of collaboration achieved by the project [17]. Conflict within the organization is one of the main factors affecting project synergy due to the diversity of interests and goals among project participants [18]. Conflict in the project construction process is dominated by interorganizational conflict, which refers to the interactive process in which actors show different interests, views, and preferences [19]. With the development of the economy, the increasing scale and technical complexity of engineering projects, the emergence of various new transaction models and project management models, the organizational conflicts of construction projects have increased dramatically. In addition to multi-cultural, multi-disciplinary, and different objectives that lead to organizational conflicts, the technical capacity or coordination ability, experience, and economic capacity of the professional team also lead to organizational conflicts [20]. In owner management, untimely owner decisions, excessive supervision, poor coordination, lack of management ability, failure to provide information or sites in a timely manner, and failure to follow procedures for handling unreasonable contractor claims can lead to conflicts [21]. This requires the project manager to have the ability to coordinate conflicts between the participants and make the project organization synergistic [22]. Most conflicts originate early in the project lifecycle, and it is important to take measures to mitigate them early on [23]. Jin et al. proposed conflict resolution strategies for the planning, construction, and handover phases by building a dynamic social network model among project participants [18]. Wang et al. discussed the causes and solutions of conflict in the construction project through multiple case studies and proposed the following six resolution strategies: (1) prevention, (2) compromising, (3) mediation, (4) resolving, (5) avoidance, and (6) smoothing [24]. Postevaluation of conflict management is also an important part, assessing the quality of conflict management in five dimensions: satisfactory resolution outcome, comprehensive resolution process, conflict prevention, perception of fairness, and postconflict effects [25]. The construction field has conducted relatively in-depth research from both the analysis of the root factors of conflict and conflict management strategies, with a focus on the study of the conflict between owners and contractors. Construction projects are open organizational systems involving many important stakeholders, while medium and large construction projects have more complex social, cultural, and legal contexts so more complex conflict factors within the organization [26]. Most of the existing studies on conflict management are based on the local perspective of some participants or in phases, the studies on project organization issues and organizational behavior are still scattered, and there is a lack of systematic studies on conflict management in medium- and large-scale projects [27]. Systems theory stems from the investigation of natural phenomena; in 1978, Qian et al. published the article “Technology of Organizational Management-Systems Engineering,” which opened a new era of systems engineering research in China [28]. In this article, a system is defined as an organic whole with specific functions, which consists of several components that interact and depend on each other, and any engineering project is a social system with continuous dynamic evolution composed of subsystems that interact and work together. Yin et al. from the perspective of engineering ontology and engineering system view proposed to look at engineering from the perspective of human survival and development, not only recognize various elements of engineering composition but also see engineering as a system, and recognize, analyze and grasp engineering from the system viewpoint [29]. The study of construction project organizational behavior requires a broader systematic perspective. As temporary organizations, construction project organizations can be viewed as complex adaptive organizations, where the behaviors of participants at all levels interact and change dynamically [30]. Principled negotiation and joint cooperative action among participants within the project organizational system can play an important role in mediating conflicts, and interorganizational trust has direct and indirect positive impacts on improving cost performance [31]. Based on the engineering system theory, the project organizational management system is a group composed of many independent participants who depend on each other [32], which belongs to an open organizational system, and the relationship between the participants constitutes the organizational structure. In this paper, the definition of synergistic project organizational management system is as follows: under the disturbance of the external environment, the internal participants of the system have a stable connection, forming an orderly structure of internal and external energy, material and information exchange, and continuously maintaining the dynamic stability of the system structure. Definition of PMC project organizational management system synergy evolution is an organizational process in which the interactions between project participants move toward orderly and dynamic stability, forming a life-like group that combines self-organization and other organizations, in which the participants under the leadership of the commander adapt to other participants in the system by changing their rules, with the ability of self-development, self-improvement, and spontaneous synergy so that the overall system exhibits dynamic synergy. The research results help PMC projects mitigate organizational conflicts and synergize the strengths of all parties involved, provide theoretical references for innovative project management models and the implementation of specialized PMC models, open up paths for achieving integrated and specialized management of the whole process in the field of construction, and significantly improve management effectiveness and construction management levels. 3. Methodology It is observed that self-driven particles such as flocks of birds, fish, and sheep have self-organized group behavior and can transition from disorder to orderly motion using local information and simple rules. Group behavior is characterized by certain macroscopically ordered behaviors of individuals in a group through interactions, with “order” usually referring to the same movement patterns [33]. In 1995, Vicsek et al. proposed the first numerical model to describe animal group behavior, and Jadbabaie et al. proved the correctness of the above numerical model from the mathematical point of view [34, 35]. Based on the above research, Cucker and Smale studied the formation mechanism of orderliness and proposed the Cucker–Smale model to describe interactions between particles [36, 37]. The Cucker–Smale model analyzes the formation mechanism of group coherence by describing the position and velocity of individuals and interindividual interactions during group motion and establishing a mathematical model; the authors also demonstrate the validity of the model by using the formation of a common language in primitive societies and the emergence of the vowel system as examples. Each individual in the Cucker–Smale model adjusts its velocity by summing the weighted average of the difference between its own velocity and that of other individuals. Given particles in dimensional Euclidean space, denotes the position and velocity of the -th particle (), and the velocity and position updates of these particles obey following the system of the below equation:where and denote the position and velocity of individual at time , respectively, and is the time step. quantifies the strength of interactions between individuals, and the strength of interactions between individuals is a smooth decreasing function of relative distance, as shown in equation (2). As can be seen from , the model is a symmetric interaction model, that is, the information transfer is bidirectional, and the interactions between subjects diminish as the relative distance increases, but the interactions are always strong or weak.where , , and are the system parameters and is the decay rate. Definition 1.1. The solution of system (1) with asymptotic group effect means that(1)Relative velocity tends to be 0, that is, , (2)Relative displacement aggregation, that is, , Shen proved the correctness of the Cucker–Smale model using induction and obtained convergence results similar to the original model [38]. Cucker and Dong further explored the Cucker–Smale model with a hierarchical structure using a subsystem induction approach and using a flock of birds perched on a branch and suddenly disturbed by a predator as an empirical case [39]. Subsequent researchers have proposed various improvements to the Cucker–Smale model to suit different application scenarios and have also validated the validity of the model from different perspectives. Cucker et al. and Dong et al. studied improved models affected by noise and time delay, giving threshold conditions for the occurrence of group behavior [40–42]. Cucker and Markou I et al. improved the model for collision avoidance by adding repulsive forces [43–45]. Cucker and Dong studied the Cucker–Smale model with the introduction of hierarchy and topologically acting neighborhoods, giving conditions for the occurrence of cluster clustering [46, 47]. Cluster dynamics models were originally used to simulate the group motion of animal groups in nature, and in recent years, such models have also been mostly used to study the control mechanisms of the asymptotic behavior in multi-intelligent body systems [48]. Examples including aircraft formations [49], robotic mass movements, and engineering science research [50] provide basic coordination and consistency algorithms for mobile autonomous individual systems. The famous Chinese economist Cheng pointed out that the most essential characteristic of a complex system is that its components have some degree of intelligence, that is, the ability to understand their environment, anticipate its changes, and act on predetermined goals, which is intrinsically responsible for biological evolution, technological innovation, economic development, and social progress [51]. The current research on the coordination of construction project participants is mostly based on SNA. SNA portrays the intersubject relationship through the network structure model and conducts a static quantitative evaluation of the density, centrality, and other indicators, but the organizational network structure changes dynamically as the project advances, and the static evaluation of SNA can hardly reflect the dynamic nature. The PMC project organizational management system is composed of several participants, who have independent interest goals and act according to the predetermined goals. As the project progresses, the interaction between the participants will prompt them to continuously receive information [52], summarize the experience, adjust action rules, improve their own adaptability, and make the system evolution more and more complex. In summary, this research introduces the Cucker–Smale cluster dynamics model, considers the characteristics of PMC project organizational structure, constructs the effectiveness function of the interaction between participants in the PMC project organizational management system, simulates the evolution process of the interaction of participants, identifies the causes of conflicts in PMC project organizational management systems, and explores the mechanisms and paths to achieve synergy and consistency. The research framework is shown in Figure 1.
Starting right: establishing requirements
  • N Udo
Udo, N. (2009). Starting right: establishing requirements. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress.
Effect of Contractor
  • Debelo Elias Defalgn
Role of Project Management
  • D S Atul R Nikumbh