ChapterPDF Available

The Effect of Microwave Treatment on Aflatoxin B1 Levels in De-oiled Groundnut Cake and its Storage Study

Authors:

Abstract

The current study was designed to study the effect of microwave heating on the concentration and detoxification of Aflatoxin B 1 of deoiled groundnut cake as well as to study the changes in Aflatoxin B 1 concentration during its three month storage study. Besides untreated sample, the samples were treated in microwaves for 2, 4, 6, and 8 minutes and the concentration of Aflatoxin B 1 was determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The maximum concentration was found in untreated sample at 567.79 ppb, while the lowest concentration was found in 8 minute microwave treated sample at 269.40 ppb, showing highest % detoxification (52.58 %). Samples treated for shorter duration under microwaves shown less detoxification. After three months of storage study, the untreated deoiled groundnut cake sample showed highest concentration of Aflatoxin B 1 (695.39 ppb) while 8 minute microwave treated sample showed lowest concentration of Aflatoxin B 1 (354.42 ppb). Both treated and untreated sample shown increase in Aflatoxin B 1 concentration throughout three month of storage study. The results concluded that the microwave heating is effective method to reduce the Aflatoxin B 1 concentration and longer treatment duration under microwaves increased the detoxification, while the storage study concluded the increase in concentration of Aflatoxin B 1 during three months.
Page | 155
Chapter - 11
The Effect of Microwave Treatment on Aflatoxin
B1 Levels in De-oiled Groundnut Cake and its
Storage Study
Authors
Hemrajsinh Chhasatiya*
Department of Food Processing Technology, Anand
Agricultural University Anand, Gujarat, India
Govind Tagalpallewar
Department of Food Processing Technology, Anand
Agricultural University Anand, Gujarat, India
Kedar Damle
Department of Food Safety and Testing, Anand Agricultural
University, Anand, Gujarat, India
Hiren Bhatt
Department of Food Safety and Testing, Anand Agricultural
University, Anand, Gujarat, India
Page | 156
Page | 157
Chapter - 11
The Effect of Microwave Treatment on Aflatoxin B1 Levels
in De-oiled Groundnut Cake and its Storage Study
Hemrajsinh Chhasatiya*, Govind Tagalpallewar, Kedar Damle and Hiren Bhatt
Abstract
The current study was designed to study the effect of microwave heating
on the concentration and detoxification of Aflatoxin B1 of deoiled groundnut
cake as well as to study the changes in Aflatoxin B1 concentration during its
three month storage study. Besides untreated sample, the samples were
treated in microwaves for 2, 4, 6, and 8 minutes and the concentration of
Aflatoxin B1 was determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass
spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The maximum concentration was found in
untreated sample at 567.79 ppb, while the lowest concentration was found in
8 minute microwave treated sample at 269.40 ppb, showing highest %
detoxification (52.58 %). Samples treated for shorter duration under
microwaves shown less detoxification. After three months of storage study,
the untreated deoiled groundnut cake sample showed highest concentration
of Aflatoxin B1 (695.39 ppb) while 8 minute microwave treated sample
showed lowest concentration of Aflatoxin B1 (354.42 ppb). Both treated and
untreated sample shown increase in Aflatoxin B1 concentration throughout
three month of storage study. The results concluded that the microwave
heating is effective method to reduce the Aflatoxin B1 concentration and
longer treatment duration under microwaves increased the detoxification,
while the storage study concluded the increase in concentration of Aflatoxin
B1 during three months.
Keywords: Aflatoxin, microwave, groundnut, detoxification, liquid
chromatography, mycotoxin.
1. Introduction
India is fortunate to have a diverse range of oilseed crops growing in its
diverse agro-climatic zones. After the United States, China, Brazil, and
Argentina, India is ranked fifth in the world's vegetable oil economy. A
widespread range of oilseed crops are cultivated in various agro-climatic
Page | 158
zones, but their growth performance is subject to a variety of risks
throughout time and across different agroclimatic regions. Many biotic,
abiotic, technical, institutional, and socio-economic restrictions prevent
many oilseed crops from realizing their full yield potential, particularly
groundnut. Among the oilseed crops, peanut, often known as groundnut, has
a significant position in the country's oilseed profile.
Groundnut is a member of the Papillionaceae family and is known as the
"monarch of oilseeds," "poor man's cashew nut," and "wondernut”. Around
4050% of the oil in groundnut is present. In many countries, groundnut oil
is utilized as an edible oil, and the oil cake is used as cattle feed once the oil
is extracted. Groundnut has the potential to thrive in agro-climatic
circumstances that are less than ideal. After soybean, rapeseed, cotton, and
sunflower, groundnut ranks fifth with 7.3 percent of total world oilseed
production. After China, India is the world's following biggest producer of
groundnut. During the 2018-19 crop year, India produced 6727.18 tonnes of
groundnut on 4730.76 thousand hectares. Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh,
Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan, and Karnataka are the leading
producers of groundnut in India. Gujarat is the foremost groundnut producer
in India, by an area of 1594.21 thousand hectares and a harvest of about
2202.82 thousand tonnes, accounting for 33.69 percent of the total area and
32.74 percent of the total production, followed by Rajasthan with 14.23
percent of the area and 22.55 percent of the production, Andhra Pradesh with
15.81 percent of the area and 6.87 percent of the production, and Tamil Nadu
with 7.09 percent of the area and 13.55 percent of the production (Nayak,
2021).
Some strains of filamentous microfungi produce a group of secondary
harmful compounds known as mycotoxins. Animal feed and plant products
such as maize, groundnuts, wheat, rice, and soya contain mycotoxins
(Alshannaq, 2017). These toxins are formed in feed and grain during the
growing, harvesting, and storage periods (Andrade & Caldas, 2015). There
are 450 different forms of mycotoxins that have been found so far, but only a
few of them are relevant to humans. Aspergillus, Alternaria, Claviceps,
Fusarium, and Penicillium are the genera that produce the majority of
mycotoxins (Pitt et al., 2013).
Mycotoxicosis refers to the diseases produced by mycotoxins in humans
and animals. Fungal illnesses range in severity from acutely hazardous to
cancer-causing or immunosuppressive. Mycotoxins are not only hazardous
to human beings, but they are also a source of immunosuppressants,
antibiotics, and substances that are used to treat migraine headaches and
Page | 159
postpartum haemorrhage. (Peraica et al., 1999). Because of their innate
cancer-causing qualities and pathogenetic effects in humans and animals,
Aflatoxins are the most investigated group of mycotoxins. Aspergillus
parasiticus, Aspergillus pseudotamarii, Aspergillus nomius, Aspergillus
flavus, and Aspergillus tamari and produce these secondary metabolites.
Only A. parasiticus and A. flavus produce concentrations larger enough to be
economically significant. Special strains of A. parasiticus and A. flavus
produce the Aflatoxin B1, Aflatoxin B2, Aflatoxin G1, and Aflatoxin G2.
Aflatoxin B is only produced by A. flavus, whereas Aflatoxin B and G are
produced by other species (Aiko & Mehta, 2015).
Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is broken down into Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1), which
is secreted in urine and milk (Zain, 2011). AFB1 and AFM1 are classified as
human carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IRCA) (Liu & Wu, 2010). AFs are potent toxins that have been
demonstrated to be immunosuppressive, mutagen, teratogen, and carcinogen
(Egmond, 2007). Because contaminated foods are typically avoided, acute
aflatoxicosis is uncommon in people. However, Aflatoxins can cause
tumours (carcinogenesis) and mutations (mutagenesis), particularly
hepatocellular carcinoma. Toxic effects such as nutritional interference and
immunosuppression occur as a result of long-term exposure to low quantities
of Aflatoxins (Bennett, 2003).
Even low doses of Aflatoxins over time can be extremely harmful, and
this risk is heightened by poor nutrition. Kwashiorkor is caused by a protein
deficiency in the diet. Irritability and exhaustion are two early kwashiorkor
symptoms. Weight loss, skin abnormalities, slower growth, generalized
edoema, liver and belly enlargement, muscle wasting, and a weakened
immune system causing frequent infections are all symptoms that develop as
the disease advances. As a result, if a human is fed a low-nutrient diet,
Aflatoxin can be extremely harmful. Humans can be exposed to Aflatoxins
either directly or indirectly by drinking milk from animals fed Aflatoxins-
contaminated feed, in which Aflatoxin B1 or Aflatoxin B2 is converted into
Aflatoxin M1 or Aflatoxin M2 and released into the milk (Stoloff, 1991).
Groundnuts and maize, and also a range of other nuts and cereal grains
and, have been related to aflatoxin contamination. Aflatoxin contamination
of groundnuts and groundnut products is common in the field and during
storage, especially in hot and humid regions like those prevalent in India.
Excessive moisture and temperature, relative humidity, insect damage, and
other variables all influence the production of aflatoxins. Aflatoxin
contamination is more common in tropical and sub-tropical agricultural
Page | 160
commodities, partially due to the warm and humid climate, and partly due to
inadequate harvesting, processing, and storage techniques (Ahmad, 1994).
Depending on the moisture content, natural composition, type of matrix,
and additions in food and food processing, particularly cooking, alters levels
of naturally occurring Aflatoxins. Various food processing processes have
been shown to impair the stability of Aflatoxins in food in previous studies.
Aflatoxin is destroyed to some amount through food processing, but there is
a general resistance to destruction. Various cooking methods, such as
roasting, frying, and microwave treatment, have exhibited varying degrees of
Aflatoxins decontamination.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Raw material procurement
A fresh sample of de-oiled groundnut cake was procured from Vinay
Solvent Industries, Junagadh, Gujarat.
2.2 Sample collection and storage
The de-oiled groundnut cake was initially coarsely grounded in wet dry
grinder. From which 10 samples weighing 500 gm were collected for 4
microwave treatments and 3 replications for different time duration of
2,4,6,8 minutes while 3 samples were collected as control samples. The
samples were filled in laminated plastic pouches and kept at room
temperature.
2.3 Microwave treatment
After collecting the samples all the samples excluding the control
samples were given microwave treatment in IFB Model 30SC3 microwave
for varying time duration of 2,4,6,8 minutes at 0.9 kWh.
2.4 Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-
MS/MS) apparatus
The samples were analyzed in Agilent Technologies 6440 Triple Quad
LC-MS/MS.
2.5 Sample preparation
Xu et al (2016)'s method was used to develop the sample preparation
procedure. The groundnut sample (5g) was carefully weighed into a 50-mL
centrifuge tube, and the extraction solvent (20mL, 70:29:1 (v/v)) was added.
AFB1 was extracted for 1 minute in a turbine mixer, then vigorously
vortexing for 30 minutes in an automatic vibrator. The supernatant was
Page | 161
obtained after centrifuging the extract for 5 minutes at 10,000 r/min. A one-
milliliter aliquot of the supernatant was transferred to a five-milliliter
centrifuge tube and diluted to three millilitres with water. For LCMS/MS
analysis, the sample solution (1mL) was directly transferred into vials.
2.6 LCMS/MS conditions
Acetonitrile (A) and water with 0.2 percent formic acid were used as the
gradient elution solvent (B). The gradient was set up like this: 0-1 minute,
95-80 percent B; 1-4 minute, 80-75 percent B; 4-6 minute, 75 percent B; 6-8
minute, 75-0 percent B; 8-8.5 minute, 0 percent B; 8.5-10 minute, 0-95
percent B; and 10-12 minute, 95 percent B. The injection volume was 10mL
and the column temperature was 40 °C. The flow rate was 0.3mL/min.
2.7 Methodology
To eliminate matrix effects, matrix-matched calibration standards were
created using blank extracts of the samples. Pipetting appropriate volumes
into a series of 50-mL calibrated tubes and diluting to volume was employed
to generate working standard solutions. 500, 100, 50, 10, 1, 0.5, and 0.1 ppb
were the concentrations. Peak area was used as the dependent variable (y-
axis) and the concentration of each analyte (x-axis) was used as the
independent variable to create the calibration curve illustrated in figure 1.
The correlation coefficient (r) value of each calibration curve was used to
determine linearity (figure 2).
Figure 1: Standard calibration curve for Aflatoxin B1
Page | 162
Figure 2: Chromatograph for standard solution of Aflatoxin B1 (500 ppb) and control
sample
3. Results
The results obtained by LC-MS/MS analysis are shown in the table 1,
where it was observed that control sample having fresh untreated de-oiled
groundnut cake powder had highest concentration of the Aflatoxin B1 at
567.7911 ppb. It was observed that the increase in time for microwave
treatment increased the detoxification effect as sample treated for 2 minutes
found to have 471.841 ppb concentration while sample treated for 8 minutes
found to have 269.4039 ppb concentration of Aflatoxin B1. Figure 3
demonstrates the concentration of Aflatoxin B1 for different time of
treatment in form of line chart. The percentage detoxification is shown in the
table 1 with the highest detoxification occurred at 8 minutes treatment time
(52.58 %) and lowest detoxification occurred at 2 minutes treatment time
(16.89 %). Figure 4 demonstrates the percentage detoxification in form of
line chart. Table 2 shows the ANOVA test for Concentration of Aflatoxin B1
at the start of experiment.
Page | 163
Figure 3: Concentration of Aflatoxin B1 at the start of experiment (ppb)
Figure 4: Percentage detoxification of Aflatoxin B1
Page | 164
Figure 5: Concentration of Aflatoxin B1 (ppb) for different treatments throughout the
3 month storage study
Table 1: Concentration of Aflatoxin B1 (ppb) at the start of experiment
Sr. No.
Treatment time
Concentration of Aflatoxin B1
at the start of experiment
% Detoxification
1
Control (Untreated)
567.7911
-
2
2 min
471.841
16.8988
3
4 min
412.4497
27.3589
4
6 min
379.9462
33.0834
5
8 min
269.4039
52.5881
Table 2: ANOVA test for concentration of Aflatoxin B1 at the start of experiment
Variance
df
Cal.F
Tbl. F 5%
T Value
Result
Treat.
4
235.5908
3.48
2.228
S.Em.=
7.20
Error
10
CD at 5%=
22.69
Total
14
C.V. %=
2.97
Table 3 demonstrates concentration of Aflatoxin B1 during its 3 months
of storage study. Showing increase amount of concentration with time in
treated as well as untreated samples, with the highest concentration found in
untreated sample at the end of 3 months at 695.3941 ppb and lowest
concentration in 8 minute treated samples at 354.422 ppb. Figure 5
demonstrates the concentration of Aflatoxin B1 for different treatments
throughout the 3 month storage study. Table 4 shows the ANOVA test for
Concentration of Aflatoxin B1 at after 3 months of storage study.
Page | 165
Table 3: Concentration of Aflatoxin B1 (ppb) during 3 months of storage study
Sr. No.
Month
Treatment time
Control
2 min
4 min
6 min
8 min
1
At the start of experiment
567.7911
471.841
412.4497
379.9462
269.4039
2
After 1 month of treatment
632.7546
486.8267
435.5333
419.8733
291.3598
3
After 2 month of treatment
673.8517
509.9264
466.5713
456.9162
328.2967
4
After 3 month of treatment
695.3941
524.9752
481.7159
463.9034
354.422
Table 4: ANOVA test for concentration of Aflatoxin B1 for 3 month storage study
Variance
df
S.S.
M.S.
Cal. F.
Tbl. F 5%
T Value
Result
Treat.
19
762274.1
40119.69
633.0206
1.855
2.021
S.Em.=
4.60
Error
40
2535.127
63.37818
CD at 5%=
13.14
Total
59
764809.3
C.V. %=
1.71
4. Discussion
Microwave treatment shown a significant effect on the concentration of
Aflatoxin B1 showing greater impact of microwaves on microorganisms
responsible for producing Aflatoxin B1. The untreated samples were found to
be maximum in concentration of Aflatoxin B1 and throughout the storage
study of deoiled groundnut cake the concentration of Aflatoxin B1 kept
increasing with time. While the treated sample found to be less in
concentration of Aflatoxin B1 due to effect of microwaves on aflatoxin
producing microorganisms. It was observed that control sample having fresh
untreated de-oiled groundnut cake powder had highest concentration of the
Aflatoxin B1 at 567.7911 ppb. It was observed that the increase in time for
microwave treatment increased the detoxification effect as sample treated for
2 minutes found to have 471.841 ppb concentration while sample treated for
8 minutes found to have 269.4039 ppb concentration of Aflatoxin B1.
However, throughout the storage study the concentration of Aflatoxin B1
kept increasing as the untreated samples. With the highest concentration
found in untreated sample at the end of 3 months at 695.3941 ppb and lowest
concentration in 8 minute treated samples at 354.422 ppb. The detoxification
of the Aflatoxin B1 was found to be greater in case of samples treated for
longer period of time under the microwaves. The highest % detoxification
was found in 8 minute treated sample with 52.58 % reduction in Aflatoxin
B1 concentration while lowest concentration was found in 2 minute treated
sample with 16.89 %. Showing that longer duration of microwave treatment
resulted more detoxification. During the 3 month storage study of deoiled
groundnut cake the Aflatoxin B1 concentration increased gradually in both
treated and untreated samples.
Page | 166
5. Conclusion
Microwave treatment is an efficient way to lower Aflatoxin B1 levels in
deoiled groundnut cake. As de-oiled groundnut cake is a very good of source
of protein and can be used in variety of fortified foods. As de-oiled cake is a
by-product of oil industries as well as the production of groundnut
throughout India is remarkable, it can be easily obtained. However, poor
post-harvest handling can lead to development of Aflatoxin, mainly
Aflatoxin B1. Microwave treatment can be an effective way for
detoxification of Aflatoxin. This study concluded that increased microwave
treatment time reduced the concentration of Aflatoxin B1 that shows the
increased detoxification. After three month of storage period the
concentration of Aflatoxin B1 was found to be increased but it was observed
that the increase in concentration was less in samples treated for longer
duration with microwaves than shorter duration. The microwave treatment
for the duration of 8 min was found to be most effective way for
detoxification of Aflatoxin B1 and samples also showed less increase in
concentration meaning it hindered the further development of Aflatoxin B1.
Acknowledgement
All the study was carried out the College of Food Processing
Technology and Bio-energy, Anand Agricultural University, Anand.
Conflict of interest
There was no disagreement among the writers over the research project.
References
1. Ahmad, M. A., Khan, B. A., Shamsuddin, Z. A., & MA, K. (1994).
Problem of Aflatoxins in Edible Nuts in Pakistan. Impact of Food
Research on New Product Development”, Proceedings, 179-183.
2. Aiko, V., & Mehta, A. (2015). Occurrence, detection and detoxification
of mycotoxins. Journal of biosciences, 40(5), 943-954.
3. Alshannaq, A., & Yu, J. H. (2017). Occurrence, toxicity, and analysis of
major mycotoxins in food. International journal of environmental
research and public health, 14(6), 632.
4. Andrade, P. D., & Caldas, E. D. (2015). Aflatoxins in cereals:
worldwide occurrence and dietary risk assessment. World Mycotoxin
Journal, 8(4), 415-431.
5. Asghar, A. (2011). Aflatoxins B1 and B2 contamination of peanut and
peanut products and subsequent microwave detoxification. Journal of
Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences, 1, 1-3.
Page | 167
6. Bennett, J. W., & Klich, M. (2003). Mycotoxins. Clinical microbiology
reviews, 16(3), 497516.
7. Egmond, H. P., Schothorst, R. C., & Jonker, M. A. (2007). Regulations
relating to mycotoxins in food. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry,
1(389), 147-157.
8. Ehrlich, K. C., Kobbeman, K., Montalbano, B. G., & Cotty, P. J. (2007).
Aflatoxin-producing Aspergillus species from Thailand. International
journal of food microbiology, 114(2), 153-159.
9. Fakruddin, M., Chowdhury, A., Hossain, M. N., & Ahmed, M. M.
(2015). Characterization of aflatoxin producing Aspergillus flavus from
food and feed samples. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1-6.
10. Liu, Y., & Wu, F. (2010). Global burden of aflatoxin-induced
hepatocellular carcinoma: a risk assessment. Environmental health
perspectives, 118(6), 818-824.
11. Nayak, A. (2021). Growth and Instability Analysis of Groundnut
Production in India and Karnataka. Economic Affairs, 66(1), 61-69.
12. Peraica, M., Radić, B., Lucić, A., & Pavlović, M. (1999). Toxic effects
of mycotoxins in humans. Bulletin of the World Health
Organization, 77(9), 754.
13. Pitt, J. I., Taniwaki, M. H., & Cole, M. B. (2013). Mycotoxin production
in major crops as influenced by growing, harvesting, storage and
processing, with emphasis on the achievement of Food Safety
Objectives. Food control, 32(1), 205-215.
14. Stoloff, L., Van Egmond, H. P., & Park, D. L. (1991). Rationales for the
establishment of limits and regulations for mycotoxins. Food Additives
& Contaminants, 8(2), 213-221.
15. Xu, J. J., Zhou, J., Huang, B. F., Cai, Z. X., Xu, X. M., & Ren, Y. P.
(2016). Simultaneous and rapid determination of deoxynivalenol and its
acetylate derivatives in wheat flour and rice by ultra high performance
liquid chromatography with photo diode array detection. Journal of
separation science, 39(11), 2028-2035.
16. Zain, M. E. (2011). Impact of mycotoxins on humans and
animals. Journal of Saudi chemical society, 15(2), 129-144.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Groundnut is grown throughout the tropics and extended to the subtropical countries. India is the second largest producer of groundnut in the world after China. The fact is that groundnut crops in India, particularly in Karnataka are mainly covered under rain fed situation, which in turn has to depend on the arrival of monsoon, climatic changes and drought. Hence, the productivity level of groundnut crop was erratic. It was in this backdrop, an attempt was made through the present study to examine the growth and instability of groundnut in India and Karnataka by way of analyzing the time series data of 48 years. The results revealed that the level of instability was marginally higher in groundnut area (8.7 %) during period II compared to period I (2.9%) and period III (7.3%). The variation in production and yield of groundnut was higher during the period III compared to period I and II. Change in the mean area is contributing more to change in average production of groundnut in India and in Karnataka followed by interaction between changes in mean area and mean yield. Change in area variance is the predominant component contributing to the change in variance of production of groundnut in India as well as in Karnataka. From the outcome of the result, it is concluded that the researchers and policy makers have to pay more attention to develop location specific cultural practice to increase and sustain groundnut production and yield in the nation. Highlights m The groundnut crops in India, particularly in Karnataka are mainly covered under rain fed situation, which in turn has to depend on the arrival of monsoon, climatic changes and drought. Hence, the productivity level of groundnut crop was erratic. m Instability is one of the important decision parameters in development dynamics and more so in the context of agriculture production. m Change in area variance is the predominant component contributing to the change in variance of production of groundnut in India as well as in Karnataka.
Article
Full-text available
Mycotoxins are toxic secondary metabolites produced by certain filamentous fungi (molds). These low molecular weight compounds (usually less than 1000 Daltons) are naturally occurring and practically unavoidable. They can enter our food chain either directly from plant-based food components contaminated with mycotoxins or by indirect contamination from the growth of toxigenic fungi on food. Mycotoxins can accumulate in maturing corn, cereals, soybeans, sorghum, peanuts, and other food and feed crops in the field and in grain during transportation. Consumption of mycotoxin-contaminated food or feed can cause acute or chronic toxicity in human and animals. In addition to concerns over adverse effects from direct consumption of mycotoxin-contaminated foods and feeds, there is also public health concern over the potential ingestion of animal-derived food products, such as meat, milk, or eggs, containing residues or metabolites of mycotoxins. Members of three fungal genera, Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium, are the major mycotoxin producers. While over 300 mycotoxins have been identified, six (aflatoxins, trichothecenes, zearalenone, fumonisins, ochratoxins, and patulin) are regularly found in food, posing unpredictable and ongoing food safety problems worldwide. This review summarizes the toxicity of the six mycotoxins, foods commonly contaminated by one or more of them, and the current methods for detection and analysis of these mycotoxins.
Article
Full-text available
Mycotoxins have been identified as important toxins affecting animal species and humans ever since the discovery of aflatoxin B1 in 1960. Mycotoxigenic fungi are ubiquitous in nature and are held responsible for economic loss as they decrease crop yield and quality of food. The presence of fungi and their mycotoxins are reported not only in food grains but also in medicinal herbs and processed foods. Since prevention is not always possible, detoxification of mycotoxins have been attempted using several means; however, only few have been accepted for practical use, e.g. ammonia in the corn industry. Organizations such as the World Health Organization, US Food and Drug Administration and European Union have set regulations and safety limits of important mycotoxins, viz. aflatoxins, fusarium toxins, ochratoxin, patulin zearalenone, etc., to ensure the safety of the consumers. This review article is a brief and up-to-date account of the occurrence, detection and detoxification of mycotoxins for those interested in and considering research in this area.
Article
Full-text available
Aspergillus flavus is one of the major producers of aflatoxin and can contaminate wide range of agricultural commodities either in field or in storage. 15 presumptive Aspergillus flavus has been isolated from 30 feed and grain samples. All the isolates were morphologically similar to Aspergillus flavus type strains. All the isolates were found to be aflatoxigenic. DNA sequencing of 5.8 s rDNA confirmed all of them to be Aspergillus flavus. Only 1 isolate possessed all the seven toxigenic gene (aflR, aflS, aflQ, aflP, aflD, aflM, and aflO) while aflP & aflQ were most prevalent in the isolates. All the isolates possessed at least three toxigenic genes. Toxin producing ability in solid culture media showed that 11 isolates isolates were able to produce both aflatoxin B1 & B2. More than 90% isolates produced aflatoxin B1 ranging 7–22 μg/g of agar. This study alarms us about the potential risks of Aspergillus flavus to public health if contaminate agricultural commodities such as grains or raw materials such as poultry feed. Proper harvest and storage management is required to reduce the risk of aflatoxin in feed and grains.
Article
Full-text available
The effectiveness of microwave heating has been evaluated for the detoxification of aflatoxins contaminated peanut and peanut products. The products comprise of various confectionery such as peanut brittle toffee, peanut brittle slabs of sugar and jaggery, roasted and salted peanut and peanut butter which were highly contaminated with aflatoxins B1 ranging from 5 to 183μg/kg and aflatoxin B2 ranging from 7 to 46.7μg/kg. The level of aflatoxins was determined and subsequently products were treated to microwave heating, which resulted in the reduction of aflatoxins content. The microwave cooking resulted in 50 to 60 % reduction in the levels of aflatoxins B1, while B2 was reduced to non-detectable limits.
Article
Full-text available
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or liver cancer, is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with prevalence 16-32 times higher in developing countries than in developed countries. Aflatoxin, a contaminant produced by the fungi Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus in maize and nuts, is a known human liver carcinogen. We sought to determine the global burden of HCC attributable to aflatoxin exposure. We conducted a quantitative cancer risk assessment, for which we collected global data on food-borne aflatoxin levels, consumption of aflatoxin-contaminated foods, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) prevalence. We calculated the cancer potency of aflatoxin for HBV-postive and HBV-negative individuals, as well as the uncertainty in all variables, to estimate the global burden of aflatoxin-related HCC. Of the 550,000-600,000 new HCC cases worldwide each year, about 25,200-155,000 may be attributable to aflatoxin exposure. Most cases occur in sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and China where populations suffer from both high HBV prevalence and largely uncontrolled aflatoxin exposure in food. Aflatoxin may play a causative role in 4.6-28.2% of all global HCC cases.
Article
A simple and reliable method of ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled with photo-diode array detection has been proposed for the simultaneous determination of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated derivatives in wheat flour and rice, especially focusing on the optimization of sample extraction, clean-up and chromatographic separation conditions. Sample pretreatment consisted of a first step using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe based extraction procedure and a subsequent clean-up step based on solid-phase extraction. The method was extensively validated in wheat flour and rice, obtaining satisfactory analytical performance with good linearity (R(2) ≥ 0.999), acceptable recoveries (80.0-104.4%) and repeatability (RSDs 1.3-10.7%). The limits of detection (21.7-57.4 μg/kg) and quantitation (72.3-191.4 μg/kg) for deoxynivalenols were lower than those usually permitted by various countries' legislation in these food matrices. The method was applied to 34 wheat and rice samples. The results were further compared with results of ultra high performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
The worldwide occurrence of aflatoxins (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, AFG2), genotoxic mycotoxins, in raw maize, rice, sorghum and wheat samples collected since the year 2000 was evaluated using published data and occurrence data from the GEMS/Food database (https://extranet.who.int/gemsfood). Dietary risk assessments were conducted using GEMS/Food total aflatoxin occurrence and food consumption data obtained from the 17 Cluster Diets. Risk characterisation arising from aflatoxin exposure was conducted using both cancer risk and margin of exposure (MOE) approaches. A total of 89 publications were retrieved from the literature, reporting data related to 18,097 samples, of which 37.6% were positive for at least one aflatoxin. The total upper bound (UB) mean for all samples analysed was 13.6 μg/kg, and was higher for rice (24.6 μg/kg) and sorghum (25.9 μg/kg). Of data related to the analysis of 4,536 samples reported to GEMS/Food database, 12.7% were positive for at least one aflatoxin. The total UB mean was 1.9 μg/kg, and was higher for rice (2.4 μg/kg) and maize (1.6 μg/kg). Total intakes ranged from 3.0 ng/kg bw/ day (Cluster C11) to 17.1 ng/kg bw/day (Cluster C09). On average, the consumption of rice contributed to 41.6% of the total aflatoxin intake in all clusters, followed by wheat (35.4%), maize (21.2%) and sorghum (1.8%). The lowest cancer risk was found in cluster C11 (0.057 cancers/year/105 individuals), and the highest in cluster C09 (0.467 cancers/year/105 individuals). MOE ranged from 56 (C11) to 10 (C09), indicating a potential risk to consumers. These results highlight the need for continuous action by health authorities to decrease aflatoxin contamination in cereals, as they are staple foods in diets worldwide. These actions include the enforcement of code of practices at the national level and the establishment of maximum contamination levels by the Codex System.
Article
Cited By (since 1996):42, Export Date: 18 October 2014
Article
The concept of Food Safety Objective (FSO) has mostly been applied to understanding the effects of handling and processing on levels of bacterial pathogens in foods, but it is also applicable to the formation and removal of mycotoxins. This paper provides a general overview of how the concept of FSO can be used to understand increases and decreases in mycotoxin levels in foods, on the basis that international regulatory limits are equivalent to an FSO. Detailed information is provided on the ecology of the formation of aflatoxins, fumonisins, ochratoxin A and deoxynivalenol in major commodities. Methods in use to reduce levels of these mycotoxins, to meet an FSO, are then detailed. Each of the major mycotoxin – food combinations is visualised using a novel graphical method.