ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The most widely used domestic water heaters in Bulgaria are the electric ones, with a storage tank. The main construction factors for the efficiency of the hot water boiler are considered in the present study: the temperature of water and the volume of the tank; the dimensions of the tank; the time for heating and discharge time; the insulation material and the thickness of insulation; the power of the electric heater. The average volume temperatures have been calculated analytical, the stratification effect is not taken into account. The different variants for design, insulation and the power of heater have been proposed. The results indicate for a possibility of reducing electricity for preparing hot water up to 13%. The further evaluation of the economic capability of the options has to be made.
Content may be subject to copyright.
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Reduction of electricity for domestic hot water with
tank-style heater
To cite this article: Tomislav Atanasov 2023 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1128 012006
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
You may also like
A method for a cradle-to-cradle life cycle
assessment of integrated collector-storage
solar water heaters
Ruth M Saint, Francesco Pomponi and
John I Currie
-
An innovative control system of a hybrid
tankless water heaters using LabVIEW
R F Garcia and A Chua
-
Estimating residential hot water
consumption from smart electricity meter
data
Joseph L Bongungu, Paul W Francisco,
Stacy L Gloss et al.
-
This content was downloaded from IP address 94.176.88.112 on 18/01/2023 at 00:33
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
PEPM-2022
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1128 (2023) 012006
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1128/1/012006
1
Reduction of electricity for domestic hot water with tank-style
heater
Tomislav ATANASOV
Technical University of Sofia, Department of Heating and Refrigeration Engineering,
1156 Sofia, Bulgaria,
E-mail: toatanasov@tu-sofia.bg
Abstract. The most widely used domestic water heaters in Bulgaria are the electric
ones, with a storage tank. The main construction factors for the efficiency of the hot
water boiler are considered in the present study: the temperature of water and the
volume of the tank; the dimensions of the tank; the time for heating and discharge
time; the insulation material and the thickness of insulation; the power of the electric
heater. The average volume temperatures have been calculated analytical, the
stratification effect is not taken into account. The different variants for design,
insulation and the power of heater have been proposed. The results indicate for a
possibility of reducing electricity for preparing hot water up to 13%. The further
evaluation of the economic capability of the options has to be made.
Keywords: water domestic heater, reduction of the electricity, factor for efficiency, analytic
determination of temperatures.
1. Introduction
Hot water is necessary for different needs in the home and industry. Every building must have an
installation for providing hot water, which - unlike heating and air conditioning - is used all year
round. The most common water heaters are [1]:
Tank-style water heaters (electric, gas, wood or oil)
Tankless on-demand or “instantaneous” water heaters
Indirect water heaters connected to a boiler (solar systems, thermodynamic systems)
For the reasons of the lowest initial costs and two tariffs for electricity, widely used domestic water
heaters in Bulgaria is the electric one, with a storage tank, insulated with polyurethane foam. The all
quantity of water is heated from 22:00 to 06:00, when the cost is significantly lower for domestic
PEPM-2022
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1128 (2023) 012006
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1128/1/012006
2
users, and is stored until it is used. The heat loss rise electricity consumption and they waste money
[2[. Measures to reduce heat losses are of two types - organizational and constructive.
The organizational decisions:
convergence of heating and consumption cycles;
delayed start of heating, depending on the water temperature in the boiler at 22:00 and power
of the electric heater;
reduction of the water heating temperature in case of decreasing the number of inhabitants or
in other instances of reduced consumption.
The constructive decisions:
the temperature of water and the volume of the tank - increasing the water content would
allow the water temperature in the boiler to decrease, but this means higher and unjustified
initial capital costs;
the dimensions of the tank - determining the diameter and the height of the water heater (at a
given volume) so that tank surface is as small as possible;
the time for heating - choosing an electric heater with a reasonably larger wattage than
required, which means a shorter heating cycle and less heat waste;
the thickness of insulation - as the thickness of the insulation increases, the heat loss
decreases, but this means higher initial capital costs, which should be justified;
For the aims of the present study, the following conditions were adopted:
temperature of the consumption water 37.5 °C;
distributed water temperature 40 °C;
necessary amount of hot water (at the above temperature) for one day 250 l;
warm-up time - between 22:00 and 6:00;
time for intensive consumption between 18:00 and 22:00.
type of the heater tank-style, with electric heater
water heating temperature in the boiler - not lower than 60°C.
The heater is shown in figure 1.
Figure 1. Tank-style heater.
PEPM-2022
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1128 (2023) 012006
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1128/1/012006
3
2. Structural dimensioning
2.1. Volume of the tank and the water heat temperature
The mixing of the hot and cold water can be described by the next equations:
=,().
[kg] (1)
.,.+.,.=+.,. [kJ] (2)
where,
 is the mass of water, [kg];
,() is the specific density of water at a given temperature, [kg/m³];
is the volume of the water, [m³];
 is the mass of hot water in the tank [kg];
 is the mass of cold water [kg];
, is the water specific heat capacity, [kJ/(kg.K)];
is the hot water temperature, [°C];
 is the cold water temperature, [°C];
is the mixed water temperature, [°C].
Water with temperature 40°C can be obtained with mixing the hot water from the tank and cold
water from the water network (10°C) figure 2. For 250 [l] per day we can choose between 2 options
- a tank with a volume of 200 [l] and temperature 80 [°C] or a tank with volume of 250 [l] and
temperature 73 [°C]. The better option is the 200 [l] tank with temperature 80 [°C], because of the
lower investments, the smaller dimensions and the smaller external surface.
Figure 2. Water tank volume selection.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
tg=60°C
tg=65°C
tg=70°C
tg=75°C
tg=80°C
tg=85°C
tg=90°C
Mixed water quontity [l]
Water temperature in the tank [°C]
V=100 l
V=150 l
V=200 l
V=250 l
PEPM-2022
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1128 (2023) 012006
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1128/1/012006
4
2.2. Tank dimensions
Several variations for 200 [l] tank are shown in figure 3. The variant D=0.6 [m] and H=0.7 [m] have
minimum external surface 1.9 [m²]. The most mass-produced tanks have configurations close to
variant D=0.4 [m] and H=1.6 [m]. This article examines three options M1, M2, M3 table 1.
2.3. Tank insulation
The most common used domestic heaters are insulated with 50 [mm] polyurethane foam (specific
thermal conductivity λ=0.032 [W/(m.K)]). Three options for thickness are considered: 50; 75; 100
mm. The heat transfer coefficient are calculated and shown in table 2.
Figure 3. External surface for tanks with different dimensions.
2.4. Electric power of the heater
To heat water with an initial temperature of 40 [°C] to 80 [°C] over a period of 8 hours, an electric
heater with a power of 1.16 kW is required. Three options of heaters are considered 1.0; 1.5; 2.0
[kW].
Table 1.
BOILER
D X H
Ext. surface
Ф50
Ф75
Ф100
V=200 l
m x m
[W/°C]
[W/°C]
[W/°C]
M1
0.40 x 1.60
2.3
1.662
1.233
1.012
M2
0.50 x 1.00
2.0
1.369
0.996
0.803
М3
0.60 x 0.70
1.9
1.265
0.905
0.720
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
D=0.4 [m]
D=0.5 [m]
D=0.6 [m]
D=0.7 [m]
D=0.8 [m]
Tank height H [m]
Tank external surface [m²]
V = 200 [l]
Ehternal surface [m²]
H [m]
PEPM-2022
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1128 (2023) 012006
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1128/1/012006
5
Table 2. Energy for heating the water
Insulation λ=0.032 [W/(m.K)]
50mm
75mm
100mm
Ext.
surface
α
[W/m².K]
U50
[W/m².K]
U75
[W/m².K]
U100
[W/m².K]
ver
10
0.602
0.409
0.310
hor↑
12
0.608
0.412
0.312
hor↓
8
0.593
0.405
0.308
3. Analytical models
The analytical model for tanks in heating and accumulating mode [3] is used. The procedures give
results for average water temperatures into the tank and take into account:
geometrical and the constructive parameters of the tank (D, H, insulation);
fluid characteristics;
temperatures the initial fluid temperature and the ambient air temperature.
3.1. Analytical model for accumulation mode
The equations (3) - (7) described the processes [3] are:
,(=)=. ., +󰇛1 . 󰇜. 󰇟󰇠 (3)
,=,(=).1.
. , 󰇟󰇠 (4)
(,,)=1
. ,
, , [s] (5)
=
., , [1/s] (6)
=(.), [W/] (7)
   
 
where,
,(=) is the water temperature in moment [s], [°C];
, is the initial temperature of the water, [°C];
, is the final temperature of the water, [°C];
is the ambient air temperature, [°C];
(,,) is the time for change the temperature from ,  , [s].
is the mass of the water in the tank, [kg];
, is the water specific heat capacity [kJ/kg.K].
3.2. Analytical model for the heating mode
The equations (8) - (11) described the processes [3] are:
,(=)=. ., +󰇛1 . 󰇜.+󰇛1 . 󰇜.
, [C]; (8)
PEPM-2022
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1128 (2023) 012006
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1128/1/012006
6
,1,2=1
.,2
,1
,
[s]; (9)
=
.,
,
[1/s]; (10)
 =.󰇡,,󰇢
3600
,
[kWh] (11)
where,
 is the electricity for heating, [kWh];
is the electric power of heater, [kW];
4. Analytical calculations
4.1. Analytical calculations for accumulation mode
The average temperature in the tank have to be 80 [°C] at 18:00. The required water temperature in the
tank 12 hours (720 min) earlier (at 6:00) are calculated by (4) in the next conditions:
The volume of the tank is 200 [l];
Initial temperatures of water , (at 22:00) is 40 [°C];
The ambient temperature is 15 [°C];
Φ is calculated from (7) with the data in table 2.
The temperature curves for the different models M1, M2… M9 are shown in figure 4. The highest
temperature (85.6 [°C]) is for the basic model M1 with 50 [mm] insulation, the lowest temperature
(82.5 [°C]) is for the model M3 with 100 [mm] insulation.
Figure 4. Water temperatures at 6:00.
4.2. Analytical calculations for heating mode
The time to heat the water in the tank for different cases are calculated by (9). The consumption of
electricity for variants with 1000, 1500 and 2000 [W] heaters are calculated by (11). The results are
shown in table 3.
85.8
82.5
79.0
80.0
81.0
82.0
83.0
84.0
85.0
86.0
060 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720
INITIAL TEMPERATURE [°C]
TIME (MIN)
M1; 50mm
M2; 50mm
M3; 50mm
M1; 100mm
M1; 150mm
M2; 75mm
M3; 75mm
M2; 100mm
M3; 100mm
PEPM-2022
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1128 (2023) 012006
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1128/1/012006
7
Table 3. Energy for heating the water
Model
tw,b
[°C]
Qh=1000 [W]
Qh=1500 [W]
Qh=2000 [W]
insulation
Energy consumption Eel [kWh]
M1; 50mm
85.8
11.6
11.3
11.1
M2; 50mm
84.7
11.1
10.9
10.8
M3; 50mm
84.4
11.0
10.8
10.7
M1; 100mm
84.3
11.0
10.7
10.6
M1; 100mm
83.5
10.6
10.5
10.4
M2; 75mm
83.4
10.6
10.4
10.3
M3; 75mm
83.1
10.5
10.3
10.2
M2; 100mm
82.7
10.3
10.2
10.1
M3; 100mm
82.5
10.2
10.1
10.1
5. Reduction of electricity
The net electricity savings for the variants of boiler construction, insulation and installed capacity, can
be calculated from the data in table 3. The savings, related to the consumption of the base model, are
shown in figure 5.
Figure 5. Relative savings of electricity.
6. Conclusions
By applying of the represented in [3] analytical method for calculating the average temperature in
water thermal accumulators and heaters are estimated different models of domestic tanks for hot
water. The different variants for design, insulation, power of heater are considered. The results shows
0.0%
4.0%
5.1%
5.5%
8.3%
8.6%
9.6%
10.9%
11.7%
2.8%
6.2%
7.1%
7.4%
9.8%
10.0%
10.9%
12.1%
12.7%
4.2%
7.2%
8.1%
8.4%
10.5%
10.8%
11.6%
12.6%
13.2%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
M1;
50mm
M2;
50mm
M3;
50mm
M1;
75mm
M1;
100mm
M2;
75mm
M3;
75mm
M2;
100mm
M3;
100mm
Reduction of the Electricity
compared with the base case
Q=1000 W
Q=1500 W
Q=2000 W
base case
PEPM-2022
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1128 (2023) 012006
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1128/1/012006
8
a possibility of reducing electricity for heating up to 13% end gives opportunity for future evaluation
of the economic compatibility of the options.
Acknowledgment
The author would like to thank the Research and Development Sector at the Technical University of
Sofia for the financial support.
References
[1] Hohne P.A, Kusakana K and Numbi B.P 2019 A review of water heating technologies Energy
Reports Vol 5 p 1-19 ISSN 2352-4847 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.10.013.
[2] Sowmy D and Prado R 2008 Assessment of energy efficiency in electric storage water heaters
Energy and Buildings vol 40 Iss 12 p 2128-2132 ISSN 0378-7788
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.06.007.
[3] Tomov G 2022 Reduction of Electricity Consumption in the Production of Thermally Modified
Wood Proc. of 22-nd Internetional Symposium on Electrical Apparatus and Technologies (Bourgas,
Bulgaria), IEEE Xplore (in press)
[4] Kepplinger P, Huber G and Petrasch J 2016 Field testing of demand side management via
autonomous optimal control of a domestic hot water heater Energy and Buildings vol 127
p 730-735 ISSN 0378-7788
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.021.
[5] Nel P.J.C, Booysen M.J. and van der Merwe B 2016 An analysis of behaviour and
understanding of electric water heaters Energy for Sustainable Development vol 32 p 62-70
ISSN 09730826
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.03.006
[6] Yan C, Wang S, Ma Z and Shi W 2015 A simplified method for optimal design of solar water
heating systems based on life-cycle energy analysis Renewable Energy Vol 74 p 271-278 ISSN 0960-
1481 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.021.
[7] Keinath C.M and Garimella S 2017 An energy and cost comparison of residential water heating
technologies Energy Vol 128 p 626-633 ISSN 0360-5442
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.055.
[8] Atikol U and Aldabbagh , L.B.Y 2015 The impact of two-stage discharging on the
exergoeconomic
performance of a storage-type domestic water-heater Energy Vol 83 p 379-386 ISSN 0360-5442
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.031
[9] Hohne P. A, Kusakana K and Numbi B. P 2018 Operation cost and energy usage minimization
of
a hybrid solar/electrical water heating system International Conference on the Domestic Use of
Energy (DUE) pp. 1-7, doi: 10.23919/DUE.2018.8384387.
[10] Tomov G 2022 Reduction of Electricity Consumption in the Production of Thermally Modified
Wood 22-nd Internаtional Symposium on Electrical Apparatus and Technologies SIELA'2022
(Bourgas, Bulgaria) p 1-6 ISBN: 978-1-6654-1139-4
https://doi.org/10.1109/SIELA54794.2022.9845726
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Using data from an online national survey conducted in South Africa, this paper aims to investigate: the awareness of energy savings measures for electric water heaters (EWHs); whether or not consumers are implementing suggested measures; and if consumers understand and effectively control their EWHs’ energy usage. Additionally, the data is used to determine the success of educational and rebate programmes aimed at reducing residential energy usage and to determine possible motivations for encouraging users to reduce or alter their EWH energy and warm water consumption. The results of this questionnaire indicate that: convenience is a key factor in consumers’ willingness to implement curtailment actions; users don’t understand the energy consumption of their EWHs; and they don’t know how to control their EWHs efficiently.
Article
The process of water heating consumes enormous amounts of energy. South African households may see up to 40% of their total energy be allotted to the heating of water. The implementation of energy efficient or renewable energy source technologies, for the main purpose of heating water, may assist in reducing the magnitude of the energy crisis that South Africans are facing daily. This will, in turn, reduce energy consumption and costs, so that the energy price hikes do not affect the consumers as severely as it would otherwise.The purpose of this paper is to provide a survey of the most frequently used domestic water heating technologies. The paper aims to critically analyse and summarize recent advancements made in renewable and non-renewable water heating technologies, particularly in the South African case. These technologies include the electric storage tank water heater, solar water heaters (passive and active circulation), heat pump water heater, geothermal water heating, photovoltaic-thermal water heater, gas-fired tankless water heater, biomass water heater and oil-fired water heater.Substantial research works and other academic studies focusing on efficiency improvement, optimal design and control, were consulted and categorized in terms of contributions, focus and respective technologies. The key findings of the review conducted on the various water heating technologies are discussed and organized, based on the advantages, drawbacks, approximate initial investment, average life expectancy and payback period.The results of this survey identify gaps in existing research. The aim is to propose a new perspective on the importance of energy efficient hybrid water heating systems and the cost savings they might offer. Keywords: Water heating systems, Domestic usage, Efficiency, Literature review, Southern Africa
Article
Water heating is a significant user of energy. Several studies have investigated the development of more efficient systems. The present study compares several commercially available options for water heating and compares them with the performance of a recently developed of a gas-fired heat pump water heating system. Comparisons of each technology are conducted using annual energy use and operating cost metrics. Payback period predictions for the gas and electric heat pumps are performed with the electric and non-condensing gas storage units as a base case. Electric and gas heat pumps, at total initial costs of 2,400,areestimatedtorequire3.6and3.1yearpaybackperiodswhencomparedtoanelectricstorageunit,respectively,whileagasheatpumpwithatotalinitialcostof2,400, are estimated to require 3.6 and 3.1 year payback periods when compared to an electric storage unit, respectively, while a gas heat pump with a total initial cost of 2000 is estimated to require 2.3 years. For this study a gas heat pump cost of $2400 was assumed. Daily total draw cases for a gas heat pump of 243, 303 and 379 L compared to a non-condensing gas storage unit as the base case show payback periods of 4, 3.2 and 2.5 years, respectively. This analysis shows that electric and gas heat pump technologies offer significant energy use and operational cost savings compared to baseline water heating technologies with reasonable payback periods.
Article
While many approaches for using domestic hot water heaters (DHWH) for demand side management (DSM) have been proposed, only few of these approaches, have been implemented and tested in the field. Results from an implementation of autonomous optimization of a DHWH for DSM based on one-way communicated pseudo cost functions (PCF) are presented. An off-the-shelf DHWH was equipped with sensors and actuators. In-house software running on a Raspberry Pi handles data acquisition and optimization. Day-ahead prices serve as the PCF and are communicated via a publish/subscribe messaging service. The device was deployed in a two-person household for a period of 36 days. The first 18 days, the DHWH was operated conventionally by power line communication based on time of use-tariffs (TOU). During the second half of the field test, it was operated by optimization. In accordance with prior simulations, monetary and energy costs went down without loss of comfort. The average reduction of costs per unit electric energy was approximately 3.6%, the average reduction of cost per unit heat was approximately 12.3%, and optimization-based operation improved the thermal efficiency from 63.0% to 69.3%.
Article
The present study is concerned with the exergoeconomic performance analysis of a storage-type electrical water heater, being subjected to two volumes of hot water removals at 5 L/min; the first one immediately after the heating of water in the tank, and the second, after some time has been waited since the completion of the first discharge. This two-stage discharging regime is designed and experimented in such a way to represent the two shower taking periods after the hot water preparation in the tank is accomplished. From the experimental results, correlations between exergy destruction and the standing time between the two discharging periods, for different initial volume extractions are developed. Using these correlations it is deduced that in order to minimize the cost of exergy destruction in a two stage discharging regime, the initial withdrawal of hot water volume must be maximized, while the standing period between the two discharges is minimized. For long standing periods, the economic feasibility of thicker thermal insulation must be assessed.
Article
Nowadays there are several ways of supplying hot water for showers in residential buildings. One of them is the use of electric storage water heaters (boilers). This equipment raises the water temperature in a reservoir (tank) using the heat generated by an electric resistance. The behavior of this equipment in Brazil is still a research object and there is not a standard in the country to regulate its efficiency. In this context, an experimental program was conducted aiming to collect power consumption data to evaluate its performance. The boilers underwent an operation cycle to simulate a usage condition aiming to collect parameters for calculating the efficiency. This 1-day cycle was composed of the following phases: hot water withdrawal, reheating and standby heat loss. The methods allowed the identification of different parameters concerning the boilers work, such as: standby heat loss in 24h, hot water withdrawal rate, reheating time and energy efficiency. The average energy efficiency obtained was of 75%. The lowest efficiency was of 62% for boiler 2 and the highest was of 85% for boiler 9.
A review of water heating technologies
  • Hohne