Disaster risk management and climate change adaptation are integrated, interinstitutional, multisectoral, and interdisciplinary processes. They generally give rise to public policies with the same goals. It is not very appropriate to refer to slope instability or landslide adaptation in a general sense without alluding to disaster risk management. Promoting risk management is equivalent to promoting adaptation, although the risk derived from slope instability is not always associated with climate change.
The increase in intensity and frequency of precipitation as a result of global warming is a driver of the slope instability hazard and therefore the associated risk for exposed elements. However, the increase in the hazard is also due to environmental degradation and human action and therefore this hazard is considered to be socio-natural. On the other hand, the increase in risk is also due to the increase in vulnerability, which is the result of social processes and inappropriate land use. In other words, this type of risk is not simply the result of climate variability and climate change.
The effectiveness of risk management or of adaptation is chiefly related to the use of correct information and a suitable application of models that provide an accurate diagnosis for appropriate decision making. The use of information that fails to give rise to clear intervention actions leads to maladaptation. An appropriate hazard and risk assessment contributes to adequate spatial planning, the relocation of exposed human settlements, the improvement of neighborhoods, the design and construction of erosion control and stability works, and the implementation of both structural and non-structural preventive measures, collective insurance, and landslide warning systems, among others.
Hazard intervention, the reduction of vulnerability, and an increase in resilience are goals of both risk management and planned adaptation. However, there are also examples of autonomous adaptation associated with the way some communities have implemented slope instability prevention measures and effective community warning systems, which have appropriately involved the population. For slope instability or landslides, the risk, as well as risk management and adaptation actions, are essentially local.
From a slope instability lens (although this may extend to the remaining sectors), risk management must be considered, for all intents and purposes, to be an adaptation and development strategy. Risk is a common denominator in management from the perspective of different approaches, disciplines and sectors, such as social and economic development, infrastructure, environmental protection, spatial planning, sustainability, resilience, climate change adaptation, and risk management itself, among others. A fragmented view of the issue is inappropriate and ineffective. In an ideal scenario, disaster risk management would be increasingly promoted as a development, sustainability, and transformation strategy that, in addition to being a strategy for anticipating risks associated with climate change, would also contribute to the rendering of ecosystem services and increasing sustainability in obtaining resources for future generations.