ArticlePDF Available

The type and extent of travel for professional footballers undertaking national team duties for a national football federation

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Elite football (soccer) involves club, continental and international fixtures, requiring players to undertake extensive travel [1]. For a national football federation, this includes the transport of players between club and camp/tournament commitments, which is often a point of contention between respective organisations [2]. Partly this contention results from the effects of travel, whereby jet lag and travel fatigue can negatively affect physical performance [3-5] and athlete wellbeing [6, 7]. Given the scarcity of data on elite players following travel, an initial step for any national football federation is to understand the volume and nature of travel undertaken by national team players. Such insight may better identify the schedule, timelines and needs of athletes' post travel. Better awareness of these travel needs can help maximise availability for training and minimise the impact of travel related stresses on performance or wellbeing. However, the regularity and volume of travel to national football team commitments has not previously been described. Further, travel demands are likely to vary significantly based on the location of the athlete and the national team camp. For countries outside of Europe, such as Australia, the travel demands and ensuing effects on player preparation can be substantial for both arrival into national team and on return to clubs [7]. Hence, detailed information regarding the type, frequency, and extent of travel for national team duties is important to aid in planning optimal travel schedules and interventions to assist players for international or club duty.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Biology of Sport, Vol. 40 No3, 2023 707
Ewan Clements et al. Travel demands for national team footballers
INTRODUCTION
In the absence of player data in the research literature, specic detail
related to national team travel demands is needed, as the inuence
of jet lag and travel fatigue will differ based on anumber of different
factors related to the journey. Time zone shifts of>3hare likely to
induce symptoms of jet lag, though athletic performance reductions
exist with greater time zone differences[8,9]. For example, reduc-
tions in intermittent and maximal sprint performance[4] and jump
performance[3,4] are observed after time zone shifts of>8h.
Similarly, long-haul travel of>22 hcan reduce sleep dura-
tion[5,6,10,11], which may explain elevated fatigue,[6,10] and
reduced intermittent sprint performance[6] and lower body power[5]
following arrival. In contrast, northbound travel of 10hwhere athletes
did not travel overnight had negligible effects on sleep and well-
ness[12]. The lack of effect from this ight may be attributed to the
northward direction of travel and thus lack of signicant time zone
change, while it is also possible that the timing of the ight relative
to the sleep period may be more critical than the duration of travel.
Thus, ights of roughly>10hwith time zone changes of>3hshould
be of concern given the likelihood of inducing jet lag symptoms or
The type and extent of travel for professional footballers
undertaking national team duties for anational football
federation
AUTHORS: Ewan Clements1,2, Fabian Ehrmann2, Andrew Clark2, Mark Jones2, Donna Lu1,2,
Rob Dufeld1,2
1 School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
2 Football Australia, Sydney, Australia
ABSTRACT: Elite football (soccer) involves club, continental and international xtures, requiring players to
undertake extensive travel[1]. For anational football federation, this includes the transport of players between
club and camp/tournament commitments, which is often apoint of contention between respective organisations[2].
Partly this contention results from the effects of travel, whereby jet lag and travel fatigue can negatively affect
physical performance[3–5] and athlete wellbeing[6,7]. Given the scarcity of data on elite players following
travel, an initial step for any national football federation is to understand the volume and nature of travel
undertaken by national team players. Such insight may better identify the schedule, timelines and needs of
athletes’ post travel. Better awareness of these travel needs can help maximise availability for training and
minimise the impact of travel related stresses on performance or wellbeing. However, the regularity and volume
of travel to national football team commitments has not previously been described. Further, travel demands
are likely to vary signicantly based on the location of the athlete and the national team camp. For countries
outside of Europe, such as Australia, the travel demands and ensuing effects on player preparation can be
substantial for both arrival into national team and on return to clubs[7]. Hence, detailed information regarding
the type, frequency, and extent of travel for national team duties is important to aid in planning optimal travel
schedules and interventions to assist players for international or club duty.
CITATION: Clements E, Ehrmann F, Clark A et al. The type and extent of travel for professional footballers
undertaking national team duties for anational football federation. Biol Sport. 2023;40(3):707–713.
Received: 2022-03-17; Reviewed: 2022-07-22; Re-submitted: 2022-07-27; Accepted: 2022-09-01; Published: 2022-10-06.
interrupting normal sleep cycles. Understanding the frequency and
extent of potentially problematic travel may assist national football
federations in planning training schedules and recovery interventions
following arrival.
Currently, only two studies report travel in national football teams,
with trips of 15hacross 4time zones[13] and 19hacross 11time
zones[7]. Separately, the travel schedules of Australian club sides
competing in Asian continental competitions report travel durations
of 10h[12] and 25.6h[11]. However, these reports do not de-
scribe the full range of travel demands likely to be experienced or al-
low planning for the diversity of demands for national team players.
Furthermore, it is possible that the travel demands for players con-
tracted to clubs outside of their home continent are greater than play-
ers within the national domestic competition. For anational football
federation based outside of Europe, such as Australia, alarge num-
ber of national team players are contracted to European and Asian
clubs. Agreater understanding of the travel demands of national
team players based on club location can inform tailored travel sched-
ules and interventions based on specic needs. Accordingly, the aim
Original Paper
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.119288
Key words:
Soccer
Jet lag
Travel fatigue
National team transition
Performance
Corresponding author:
Ewan Clements
School of Sport, Exercise and
Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health,
University of Technology Sydney,
Australia
E-mail: Ewan.J.Clements@
student.uts.edu.au
ORCID:
Ewan Clements
0000-0002-7371-1773
Donna Lu
0000-0001-6294-4953
Fabian Ehrmann
0000-0002-7371-1773
Rob Dufeld
0000-0002-5641-1314
708
Ewan Clements et al. Travel demands for national team footballers
reported in 3hgroupings to better report the range and frequency
of travel demands. For comparisons between club locations, all ights
were labelled as being either outbound (travelling to national team
duty, n=244) or return (returning to club from national team,
n=244). Transition trips between national team commitments or
to alocation other than the players club were excluded from loca-
tion-based comparisons (n=71).
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive data for mean, standard deviation, median, minimum,
and maximum values for all ight variables are reported. Shapiro-Wilk
normality tests demonstrated that the data was not normally distrib-
uted, and comparisons between club location groups for all travel
variables were assessed using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests
from the “stats” package in R[14]with signicance set at p<0.05.
Where asignicant difference was observed between the groups,
pairwise comparisons were made using Dunn Tests[15] with Holm
corrected pvalues. All statistical tests were performed in the Rsta-
tistical software[14].
RESULTS
Amajority of trips involved time zone differences of3h (66%),
though 34% of ights involved differences of>3 hand 17% of
ights involved large time differences of8h(Figure1). The direc-
tion of time shifts included 50% westward travel, 43% eastward and
7% without any change in time zone. Travel times of10hoccurred
in 51% of trips, while 8% involved24htravel time. For ight
durations, 41% of trips involved10hight time, while 7% in-
volved20hight time. Most ights (64%) did not include overnight
travel, while 33% involved one night and 3% involved two nights.
The most common arrival time was in the evening between 18:00and
24:00 (39%), with early morning arrivals between 24:00and
09:00occurring for 23% of ights and 39% of ights arrived during
the day (09:00to 18:00). Players most often departed during the
day between 09:00and 18:00 (59%), while 21% of trips departed
in the evening (18:00–24:00) and 20% of trips departed in the
early morning (24:00–09:00).
Asignicant effect of player location on time zone change was
observed for both outbound (H=10.18, p=0.006; Table1) and
return (H=7.505, p=0.023; Table2) travel. Asian-based play-
ers crossed signicantly fewer time zones than Australian- (p=0.042)
and European-based players during outbound travel (p= 0.004),
and Australian-based (p=0.018) players during return travel.
Signicant differences for total travel time existed for both out-
bound (Table1) and return (Table2) travel (Outbound: H=6.159,
p=0.046; Return: H=16.754, p<0.001) and for total ight
time (Outbound: H=7.580, p=0.023Return: H=16.221,
p<0.001). Travel time was signicantly greater in Australian- com-
pared to European-based players for return travel (p=0.001) and
neared signicance for greater outbound travel duration (p=0.073).
Australian-based players had significantly greater return travel
of this study is to describe the nature and extent of travel performed
by Australian national team football players for international duties
over atwo-year period. In addition, this study compared the travel
demands for national duties between players based in Australian
(domestic), Asian and European club locations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Participants
Participants were 58male senior Australian national football (soccer)
team representatives who had undertaken travel to train or compete
for the national team between March 2018and November 2019.
Through contractual agreements, participants provided consent to
Football Australia for the use of their anonymous data for research
purposes, and human ethics approval was provided by the institu-
tional Human Ethics Committee (ETH20 –5080).
Data Collection
Details of all travel schedules undertaken as apart of Australian
national team duties between March 2018and November 2019were
provided by Football Australia. This included the details of 569dif-
ferent trips (including multiple ights per trip). Of note, during this
period the Australian team competed in the 2018FIFA World Cup
Finals in Russia, the 2019AFC Asian Cup Finals in the United Arab
Emirates, and the Round 2qualifying process for the 2022World
Cup. Participant data was anonymised prior to being provided with
player names replaced by numerical codes.
All ights were provided based on booked travel schedules, which
were then independently veried to obtain the actual arrival and de-
parture times through an online ight database (Flightera.net). For
each listed trip, the following data was extracted, i) total ight time
ii) total travel time iii) time zone change iv) number of overnights per
trip v) departure time vi) arrival time vii) number of trips per player
and viii) generic direction i.e. East/West. In dening these variables,
arrival and departure time relate to the specic time the aircraft took
off and landed, as reported via the online ight database. Total ight
time was measured as the duration of all ights included in the jour-
ney from departure to arrival location. The total travel time was the
difference between departure time and arrival time, and included
both ight time and stop-over time, however, did not include any ad-
ditional travel requirements outside air-travel. The time zone change
was calculated based on the difference between the arrival and de-
parture time zone on the day in which the player arrived and coded
for direction as East, West, or No change. Atrip was considered to
have occurred overnight if the arrival time was later than midnight
of the day of departure. The geographical continent in which aplay-
er competed at club level at the time of travel was provided by Foot-
ball Australia and was used for comparisons between the travel de-
mands of players in Australia, Europe and Asia. All ight measures
for each player were collated in aMicrosoft Excel spreadsheet and
time-based measures were converted into adecimal of hours (i.e.
12h30min was equal to 12.5h). Time-based variables are
Biology of Sport, Vol. 40 No3, 2023 709
Ewan Clements et al. Travel demands for national team footballers
return travel, Australian-based players arrived signicantly earlier in
the day than European-based players (p=0.035). Signicant dif-
ferences existed in departure time for return (H=9.556, p=0.008),
but not outbound travel (H=2.050, p=0.359). Post-hoc analy-
sis showed signicantly earlier departure times for European com-
pared to Asian-based players (p=0.049) for return trips.
No signicant differences existed for the total number of trips per
player for outbound (H=3.967, p=0.138) or return (H=3.694,
p=0.158) travel. Signicant differences existed in the number of
trips in both eastward (Outbound: H=31.282, p<0.001Return:
H=20.497, p<0.001) and westward (Outbound: H=28.667,
p<0.001Return: H=31.468, p<0.001) directions. European-
based players completed signicantly more outbound eastward trips
than both Australian (p<0.001) and Asian-based players
(p=0.016) and signicantly less westward outbound trips than
duration (p=0.001) and neared signicance for greater outbound
travel duration (p=0.064). Total ight time for both outbound and
return groups was signicantly greater for Australian-based players
(European Outbound: p=0.030Return: p=0.003; (Asian Out-
bound: p=0.043Return: p=0.001).
The number of overnight trips per player was signicantly differ-
ent between groups for both outbound (H=6.066, p=0.048) and
return (H=11.850, p=0.003). With Bonferroni correction, no
pairwise comparisons reached signicance for outbound travel, while
Australian-based players travelled overnight more frequently than
both European- (p=0.002) and Asian- (p=0.046) based players
during return travel. Signicant differences existed in arrival time for
both outbound (H=6.597, p=0.037) and return travel (H=6.567,
p=0.038); however, with Bonferroni correction, no pairwise com-
parisons for outbound travel reached signicance (p>0.05). For
FIG. 1. Distribution of A) Total Travel Time B) Total Flight Time C) Time Difference D) Flights per Trip E) Arrival Time F) Departure
Time for national team footballers during a twoyear period (n=569) for Eastward (Dark), Westward (Light) time zone shifts, and
No time change (Grey). Percentages above bars represent the proportion of each bar relative to all trips.
710
Ewan Clements et al. Travel demands for national team footballers
TABLE 1. Travel demands of Australian professional footballers
based on club geographical location travelling to anational team
commitment over atwo-year period (n=244)
Measure Player
Location Mean (±SD) Median Min. Max.
Trips per
Player (N)
All Players 4.1 ± 2.4 3.5 1.0 10.0
Australia 3.2 ± 1.9 3.0 1.0 7.0
Europe 4.6 ± 2.6 4.5 1.0 10.0
Asia 3.2 ± 1.6 3.0 1.0 7.0
Flight
Duration
(Hours)
All Players 9.2 ± 6.4 6.7 0.8 23.0
Australia 12.1 ± 6.5*#12.8 0.9 20.8
Europe 8.9 ± 6.4 6.4 0.8 23.0
Asia 7.9 ± 5.4 7.5 1.2 17.8
Travel
Duration
(Hours)
All Players 11.1 ± 8.1 7.7 0.8 31.0
Australia 14.3 ± 8.0 14.1 0.9 27.6
Europe 10.7 ± 8.2 6.9 0.8 31.0
Asia 9.5 ± 6.4 10.0 1.2 21.5
Time
Difference
(Hours)
All Players 3.8 ± 3.3 2.0 0.0 10.0
Australia 4.3 ± 3.5# 5.0 0.0 10.0
Europe 3.9 ± 3.3#2.0 0.0 10.0
Asia 2.6 ± 3.0 1.0 0.0 9.0
Eastward
Trips per
Player (N)
All Players 2.8 ± 2.5 2.0 0.0 8.0
Australia 0.2 ± 0.4* 0.0 0.0 1.0
Europe 4.1 ± 2.3#4.0 0.0 8.0
Asia 1.3 ± 0.9 1.0 0.0 3.0
Westward
Trips per
Player (N)
All Players 1.0 ± 1.5 0.0 0.0 7.0
Australia 2.8 ± 1.7* 3.0 1.0 7.0
Europe 0.3 ± 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.0
Asia 1.2 ± 1.3 1.0 0.0 3.0
Overnight
Trips per
Player (N)
All Players 2.3 ± 1.8 2.0 0.0 7.0
Australia 1.5 ± 1.4 1.0 0.0 5.0
Europe 2.7 ± 2.0 2.5 0.0 7.0
Asia 1.3 ± 1.2 1.0 0.0 3.0
Arrival Time
(HH:mm)
All Players 13:54 ± 07:18 14:59 00:00 23:54
Australia 12:42 ± 05:42 11:48 00:18 22:18
Europe 14:24 ± 07:48 16:54 00:00 23:54
Asia 11:48 ± 05:36 11:12 00:54 21:18
Departure
Time
(HH:mm)
All Players 14:36 ± 05:36 14:42 00:12 24:00
Australia 13:06 ± 07:42 10:42 00:12 23:42
Europe 15:00 ± 04:42 15:00 02:06 23:00
Asia 13:48 ± 06:42 11:54 00:36 24:00
* Signicantly different to Europe (p<0.05); # Signicantly different
to Asia (p<0.05)
TABLE 2. Travel demands of Australian professional footballers
based on club geographical location returning to club teams
following anational team commitment over a two-year period
(n=244)
Measure Player
Location Mean (±SD) Median Min. Max.
Trips per
Player (N)
All Players 4.1 ± 2.4 4.0 1.0 10.0
Australia 3.3 ± 1.9 4.0 1.0 8.0
Europe 4.7 ± 2.7 4.0 1.0 10.0
Asia 3.1 ± 1.4 3.0 1.0 6.0
Flight
Duration
(Hours)
All Players 9.6 ± 5.8 8.5 0.6 21.8
Australia 12.2 ± 5.3*#12.9 1.2 19.3
Europe 9.3 ± 5.8 7.7 0.6 21.8
Asia 7.2 ± 5.3 4.6 0.9 18.3
Travel
Duration
(Hours)
All Players 12.2 ± 7.3 11.1 0.6 30.7
Australia 15.9 ± 7.0*#16.4 1.2 29.2
Europe 11.7 ± 7.1 10.3 0.6 30.7
Asia 9.3 ± 7.0 8.0 0.9 23.9
Time
Difference
(Hours)
All Players 3.7 ± 3.3 2.0 0.0 11.0
Australia 4.8 ± 3.5#6.5 0.0 10.0
Europe 3.6 ± 3.3 2.0 0.0 11.0
Asia 2.8 ± 3.2 1.0 0.0 9.0
Eastward
Trips per
Player (N)
All Players 1.2 ± 1.4 1.0 0.0 6.0
Australia 2.8 ± 1.6* 3.0 1.0 6.0
Europe 0.6 ± 0.9 0.0 0.0 3.0
Asia 1.3 ± 0.9 1.0 0.0 3.0
Westward
Trips per
Player (N)
All Players 2.5 ± 2.4 1.5 0.0 8.0
Australia 0.2 ± 0.4* 0.0 0.0 1.0
Europe 3.8 ± 2.2#4.0 0.0 8.0
Asia 0.9 ± 0.6 1.0 0.0 2.0
Overnight
Trips per
Player (N)
All Players 1.3 ± 1.4 1.0 0.0 5.0
Australia 2.8 ± 1.8*#3.0 0.0 5.0
Europe 0.9 ± 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0
Asia 1.0 ± 1.2 1.0 0.0 3.0
Arrival Time
(HH:mm)
All Players 15:00 ± 05.48 17:00 0.1 23.9
Australia 13:06 ± 06.24* 18:00 04:54 22:36
Europe 15:36 ± 05.30 11:00 01:00 23:54
Asia 14:48 ± 05:54 17:12 00:06 23:24
Departure
Time
(HH:mm)
All Players 11:48 ± 06:00 10:54 00:30 23:42
Australia 13:12 ± 06:00 10:06 01:36 23:18
Europe 11:06 ± 06:00#14:36 00:30 23:12
Asia 13:48 ± 05:00 13:48 03:24 23:42
* Signicantly different to Europe (p<0.05). # Signicantly
different to Asia (p<0.05)
Biology of Sport, Vol. 40 No3, 2023 711
Ewan Clements et al. Travel demands for national team footballers
Australian- (p<0.001) and Asian-based (p=0.074) players. For
return trips, European-based players completed signicantly more
westward trips than both Australian (p<0.001) and Asian-based
(p=0.009) players, and signicantly fewer eastward trips than Aus-
tralian-based players (p<0.001).
DISCUSSION
This study describes the type and extent of travel demands for Aus-
tralian national team duties and compares travel demands based on
aplayer’s club location. Alarge number of trips by national team
players are unlikely to affect performance and wellbeing
(66%3htime difference, 64% not overnight, 49%<10htrav-
el time). Despite this, anumber of ights exceed 3hof time difference
(34%), occur overnight (36%) or are prolonged in duration
(51%,>10h) and therefore potentially pose concerns for perfor-
mance or recovery. Being aware of the frequency of extensive travel
demands may in turn allow national team staff to better prepare for
the arrival of players and guide preventative measures before and
after travel. Furthermore, Australian-based players generally had
greater travel demands than Asian or European-based players. There-
fore, travel strategies should consider location-specic demands of
players; with those travelling into the national team from Europe or
returning to Australian-based clubs needing greater attention for cir-
cadian adaption and promotion of sleep assistance strategies.
This study shows anumber of trips resulting in time zone differ-
ences of>3h(34%), which have been previously observed to in-
duce jet lag symptoms in athletes[13,16–18], though symptoms
are expected to be more detrimental with greater time zone differ-
ences[19–21]. Although no performance measures were recorded
in this study, 17% of trips, exceeded 8hof time zone difference,
with such time zone changes previously being shown to cause re-
ductions in intermittent and maximal sprint as well as jump perfor-
mance[3,4]. This study highlights that many national team trips
for this federation have the potential to induce detrimental jet lag
symptoms and thus practitioners should consider interventions that
can hasten the rate at which an athlete adapts to time zone chang-
es. Further, 36% of trips required overnight air travel, with this po-
tentially putting athletes at risk of impaired sleep[6,10,11]. Im-
pairments in sleep may then have further implications for wellbeing
and performance[5,6,10,22], highlighting the need for appropri-
ate strategies to monitor and promote sleep during travel[10,11,13].
Related to the overnight nature of travel, 33% of ights arrived in
the rst half of the day (24:00–12:00), and thus are likely to involve
longer durations between full sleep periods which may have addi-
tional consequences for sleep and adaptation[23]. For such trips,
daytime naps may be useful where athletes were unable to obtain
sufcient sleep during travel[24]. Currently, no studies have report-
ed jet lag, travel fatigue or other perceptual responses of national
team footballers across varying travel demands. Although no specif-
ic jet lag or travel fatigue measures were available, based on the ob-
servations of previous research and the extent of travel observed in
this study, it is likely that aconsiderable volume of national team
travel may induce circadian misalignment, jet lag or sleep disrup-
tion. Hence, given the short-turnaround between club and national
team xtures, strategies to alleviate these consequences are recom-
mended i.e. sleep hygiene, naps and awareness of travel schedules.
Such strategies may be important in maximising the availability of
players to train and prepare for both national team and club
competition[24].
Understanding locational differences in travel demands of play-
ers travelling into national team commitments will enable staff to
better cater to player-specic needs. Despite similarities in time zone
difference for European- and Australian-based players, travelling from
Europe required more eastward trips. Although not measured here,
eastward trips are reported to induce more prolonged symptoms of
jet lag[4,20,25] and may warrant earlier arrivals for European
players or greater focus on interventions to hasten circadian adap-
tation. Asian-based players experienced signicantly smaller time
zone changes and thus the risk of jet lag when travelling into camp
is less than that for European- or Australian-based players. Interest-
ingly, players who were based at clubs in Australia had the greatest
travel durations. Such anding likely reects the unique situation of
the Australian national team in which the country is geographically
based in Oceania but competes under the Asian Confederation and
thus often compete in Asia. While time zone changes may still be
aconcern for Australian-based players, the greater concern may re-
sult from travel fatigue due to longer travel durations and potential
implications of long-duration ights[9,19,21]. However, as long-
haul daytime travel10hhas not been observed to affect perfor-
mance and wellbeing[12], similar travel fatigue symptoms theoret-
ically may persist in all groups given overnight travel requirements
were similar[5,6,10]. The similarities in overnight travel amongst
all players suggests interventions to reduce travel induced sleep loss
should be of focus for national team practitioners for player arrival
into camp. Accordingly, aneed for attention on circadian re-entrain-
ment exists for European-based players, while sleep-promoting in-
terventions during and after travel are required for all players arriv-
ing for national team duties.
Given the prevalence of xture congestion in elite football[1], re-
turning players to clubs from national teams requires effective com-
munication between national and club team staff to enhance player
recovery and selection availability. During return travel, Australian-
based players had the worst travel schedules, with more eastward
trips, longer travel durations and more trips requiring overnight trav-
el. These travel schedules may place the athletes at greater likelihood
of jet lag due to the longer lasting effects following eastward trav-
el[4,26], while longer travel durations and overnight ights have
previously been observed to reduce sleep and increase fatigue[5,11].
Therefore, additional focus on hastening time zone adaptations in
players returning to Australian clubs is suggested, while attempts to
reduce sleep decits from overnight travel are also recommended.
Earlier arrivals have previously been observed to contribute to
712
Ewan Clements et al. Travel demands for national team footballers
greater symptoms of jet lag due to longer durations between full sleep
periods[23]; and should also be considered in Australian-based play-
ers who on average arrived signicantly earlier than European-based
players. While greater attention is required for Australian-based play-
ers, the average time zone differences of 3.5 ± 3.2hmay still be
enough to induce jet lag in European-based players[8,9,19]. Giv-
en these players largely travelled westward on return to clubs, it is
speculative whether these symptoms may potentially alleviate quick-
er than eastward travelling players[4,20,26].
Despite the novelty of these results, several limitations should be
considered when interpreting these ndings. Importantly, as this
study did not obtain any measures of wellness, performance or sleep
from players, any suggested effects of travel are based on previous
research. Additionally, the travel demands represent acase study of
one national team undertaking tournaments at that point of the time.
Furthermore, while abroad date range was used there is likely abias
in the ndings based on the location of tournaments. Different trav-
el demands are therefore likely to be observed between other nation-
al teams and time frames. Lastly, while amajority of international
travel is performed via aircraft, this study does not consider addition-
al modes of transport i.e. road or railway travel and its potential ef-
fects on players, nor does it account for travel to and from the
airport[8].
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, this study provides adetailed case-study of the type and extent
of travel involved in anational football team, while demonstrating that
these demands are likely to differ based on aplayer’s club location.
Travel for national team duties are diverse, and there remains many
schedules that require planning to maximise performance and wellbe-
ing. Asingle squad-wise approach to travel scheduling may not be
appropriate as the nature of travel differs signicantly between player’s
club locations. For the Australian national team, travel into camp is
likely most demanding for European-based players, while Australian-
based players may be more at risk of negative travel consequences
following return travel. As such, it is important to consider the spe-
cic demands of players on an individual or at least regional basis.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the players, coaches and staff of the
Sports Science Sports Medicine Department of Football Australia for
their support and feedback in the development of this project. No
nancial assistance was provided for this project.
Disclosure of Interest
All authors of this study were current employees of Football Austra-
lia; however, no additional funding was provided for the purpose of
this study.
Funding Details
This research did not receive any specic grant from funding agencies
in the public, commercial, or not-for-prot sectors.
1. CarlingC, McCallA, Le GallF, DupontG.
What is the extent of exposure to periods
of match congestion in professional
soccer players? J Sports Sci. 2015;
33(20):2116–24.
2. McCallA, DavisonM, AndersenTE,
BeasleyI, BizziniM, DupontG, etal.
Injury prevention strategies at the FIFA
2014World Cup: perceptions and
practices of the physicians from the
32participating national teams. Br
JSports Med. 2015;49(9):603–8. doi:
10.1136/bjsports-2015–094747.
3. ChapmanD, BullockN, RossA,
RosemondD, MartinD. Detrimental
effects of West to East transmeridian
ight on jump performance. Eur JAppl
Physiol. 2012; 112(5):1663–9. PubMed
PMID: 74188120.
4. FowlerP, KnezW, CrowcroftS,
MendhamAE, MillerJ, SargentC, etal.
Greater Effect of East versus West Travel
on Jet Lag, Sleep, and Team Sport
Performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
2017; 49(12):2548–61. PubMed PMID:
126249201.
5. FowlerP, DufeldR, MorrowI, RoachG,
VaileJ. Effects of sleep hygiene and
articial bright light interventions on
recovery from simulated international air
travel. Eur JAppl Physiol. 2015;
115(3):541–53.
6. FowlerP, DufeldR, VaileJ. Effects of
simulated domestic and international air
travel on sleep, performance, and
recovery for team sports. Scandinavian J
Med Sci Sports. 2014;25(3):441–51.
7. FowlerP, McCallA, JonesM, DufeldR.
Effects of long-haul transmeridian travel
on player preparedness: Case study of
anational team at the 2014FIFA World
Cup. JSci Med Sport. 2017;
20(4):322–7. doi: 10.1016/j.
jsams.2016.08.021.
8. ReillyT, WaterhouseJ, EdwardsB. Some
chronobiological and physiological
problems associated with long-distance
journeys. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2009;
7(2):88–101. doi: 10.1016/j.
tmaid.2008.05.002.
9. WaterhouseJ, ReillyT, AtkinsonG,
EdwardsB. Jet lag: trends and coping
strategies. The Lancet. 2007;
369(9567):1117–29.
10. StevensCJ, ThorntonHR, FowlerPM,
EshC, TaylorL. Long-Haul Northeast
Travel Disrupts Sleep and Induces
Perceived Fatigue in Endurance
Athletes. Front Physiol. 2018; 9. doi:
10.3389/fphys.2018.01826.
11. LastellaM, RoachGD, SargentC. Travel
fatigue and sleep/wake behaviors of
professional soccer players during
international competition. Sleep Health.
2019; 5(2):141–7. doi: 10.1016/j.
sleh.2018.10.013.
12. FowlerP, DufeldR, HowleK,
WatersonA, VaileJ. Effects of
Northbound Long-Haul International Air
Travel on Sleep Quantity and Subjective
Jet Lag and Wellness in Professional
Australian Soccer Players. Int JSports
Physiol Perform. 2015; 10(5):648–54.
PubMed PMID: 103585268.
13. FullagarHHK, DufeldR, SkorskiS,
WhiteD, BloomeldJ, KollingS, etal.
Sleep, Travel, and Recovery Responses of
National Footballers During and After
REFERENCES
Biology of Sport, Vol. 40 No3, 2023 713
Ewan Clements et al. Travel demands for national team footballers
Long-Haul International Air Travel. Int
JSports Physiol Perform. 2016;
11(1):86–95. PubMed PMID:
112512276.
14. RCore Team. R: Alanguage and
environment for statistical computing.
4.1.1ed. Vienna, Austria: RFoundation
for Statistical Computing; 2021.
15. DinnoA. dunn.test: Dunn’s Test of
Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums.
2017.
16. KöllingS, TreffG, WinkertK, FerrautiA,
MeyerT, PfeifferM, etal. The effect of
westward travel across ve time zones on
sleep and subjective jet-lag ratings in
athletes before and during the 2015’s
World Rowing Junior Championships.
JSports Sci. 2017; 35(22):2240–8. doi:
10.1080/02640414.2016.1265141.
17. BullockN, MartinDT, RossA,
RosemondD, MarinoFE. Effect of long
haul travel on maximal sprint
performance and diurnal variations in
elite skeleton athletes. Br JSports Med.
2007; 41(9):569–73. doi: 10.1136/
bjsm.2006.033233.
18. LemmerB, KernRI, NoldG, LohrerH.
Jet lag in athletes after eastward and
westward time-zone transition.
Chronobiol Int. 2002; 19(4):743–64.
doi: 10.1081/CBI-120005391.
19. LeatherwoodWE, DragooJL. Effect of
airline travel on performance: areview of
the literature. Br JSports Med. 2013;
47(9):561–7.
20. Forbes-RobertsonS, DudleyE,
VadgamaP, CookC, DrawerS, KilduffL.
Circadian Disruption and Remedial
Interventions: Effects and Interventions
for Jet Lag for Athletic Peak Performance.
Sports Med. 2012; 42(3):185–208.
21. WaterhouseJ, ReillyT, EdwardsB. The
stress of travel. JSports Sci. 2004;
22(10):946–66. doi:
10.1080/02640410400000264.
22. FullagarH, SkorskiS, DufeldR,
HammesD, CouttsAJ, MeyerT. Sleep
and Athletic Performance: The Effects of
Sleep Loss on Exercise Performance, and
Physiological and Cognitive Responses to
Exercise. Sports Med. 2015;
45(2):161–86. doi: DOI 10.1007/
s40279–014–0260–0.
23. WaterhouseJ, EdwardsB, NevillA,
CarvalhoS, AtkinsonG, BuckleyP, etal.
Identifying some determinants of “jet lag”
and its symptoms: Astudy of athletes
and other travellers. Br JSports Med.
2002; 36(1):54–60. doi: 10.1136/
bjsm.36.1.54.
24. WaterhouseJ, AtkinsonG, EdwardsB,
ReillyT. The role of ashort post-lunch
nap in improving cognitive, motor, and
sprint performance in participants with
partial sleep deprivation. JSports Sci.
2007; 25(14):1557–66. doi:
10.1080/02640410701244983.
25. ReillyT, AtkinsonG, EdwardsB,
WaterhouseJ, ÅkerstedtT, DavenneD,
etal. Coping with jet-lag: APosition
Statement for the European College of
Sport Science. Eur J Sport Sci. 2007;
7(1):1–7. doi:
10.1080/17461390701216823.
26. EastmanCI, BurgessHJ. How to Travel
the World Without Jet Lag. Sleep Med
Clin. 2009; 4(2):241–55. doi:
10.1016/j.jsmc.2009.02.006.
... National team staff should plan optimal travel conditions. 6 Selecting a comfortable seat (e.g., business class), giving preference to travel in charter flights, reducing the number of stopovers, finding the optimal flight times, providing the players with personalized trip plans, supplement packs, blue light filtering glasses, and other commercially available devices that stimulate blood circulation and prevent jet lag are highly recommended travel management strategies. ...
... Furthermore, 65% of players felt that international travel had a negative impact on their recovery, performance, or health [6]. According to a study conducted with the Australian men's national football team, footballers playing domestic football in Europe made an average of 9.3 nine-hour flights across multiple time zones to participate with the national team during a two-year period [7]. While an association between travel and injuries has not been established, extensive travel across multiple countries and continents is likely to have a negative impact on the performance and wellness of professional footballers [8,9]. ...
Article
Full-text available
There are concerns over the impact of the congested international match calendar on professional footballers' physical and mental well-being, and injury susceptibility. This study aimed to determine whether there were differences in match workload and international travel between injured and non-injured male football players over two elite competition seasons. An observational, retrospective , case-control study was conducted using data from the 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 seasons of five top-tier European men's football leagues. Student t-tests were used to compare cumulative match workload and international travel data over a 28-day period preceding 1270 injuries and 2540 controls. There were significant differences in match workload and international travel variables between the injured groups (all injuries and hamstring injuries) and the control group. Match workload variables were higher (p < 0.01), recovery variables lower (p < 0.01), and international travel variables higher (p < 0.01). An overload of match workload and international travel contribute to increased injury susceptibility in professional men's football. This emphasizes the need to address international match calendar concerns, including the number of games per season, the frequency of back-to-back games, and international travel requirements. Additionally, the findings highlight the importance of monitoring player match workloads, and implementing squad rotations and tailored training programs to mitigate injury risks.
Article
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between travel demands and match loads on perceptual recovery, fatigue, and sleep following postmatch travel in national football teams. In addition, the influence of travel demands and the time between match kickoff and travel departure on postmatch recovery was examined. Methods: Match-running load (via GPS) and travel data were obtained from 79 male national-team footballers. Postmatch travel duration, direction, context, time-zone difference, and time between kickoff and travel departure were collated. Athletes provided perceptual ratings of fatigue, soreness, sleep, stress, and recovery from 1 day prematch through to 3 days after postmatch travel. Linear mixed models assessed the influence of match load and travel on perceptual ratings for 3 days posttravel. Additional models assessed a standardized postmatch time point of match day + 3 to determine whether timing and extent of travel influenced recovery. Results: Higher match loads were associated with poorer recovery, fatigue, soreness, and sleep (P = .001-.032). Athletes reported poorer fatigue, soreness, and recovery when traveling from national teams back to clubs compared with between national-team matches (P < .001). Traveling eastward was associated with poorer sleep (P = .004). Longer periods between kickoff and travel departure were associated with poorer sleep on match day + 3 (P = .003). Conclusions: Perceptual recovery, fatigue, sleep, and soreness following postmatch travel were affected by both match load and travel demands. Greater match loads and eastward postmatch travel may impair recovery. In addition, departing later after a match was associated with poorer sleep on match day + 3; however, no relationships existed to any other recovery measures.
Article
Purpose: This study examined the relationship of prematch travel and in-camp training on ensuing physical and technical match performance of footballers (soccer) competing for a national team. Methods: Match running and technical performance data were obtained from 68 national-team footballers competing in international matches (N = 108). Match performance data were aligned with the confirmed travel durations, time-zone change, travel direction, and time between arrival and kickoff for the travel to the match. In addition, in-camp training load from the 3 days prior to national-team matches was also collated. Linear mixed models assessed relationships between travel and training measures with physical and technical match performance outcomes. Results: Travel variables explained little variance in outcomes (R2 = .02-.16). Traveling eastward was associated with an increase in total (P = .042) and very high-speed distance (P = .030) in matches and a 5% decrease in pass accuracy (P = .012). Greater time-zone difference was associated with increased match decelerations (P = .027), while arriving later for matches was associated with increased total (P = .041) tackles. Increases in training high-speed distance were associated with increases in match high-speed distance (P = .004) and number of decelerations (P < .001). An increase in training total distance was associated with a decrease in match decelerations (P = .002). Conclusions: Prematch travel appeared to have minimal effects on physical and technical performance in this national team. Training loads prior to matches may have some relationship with match running performance, and, thus, readiness to train should be a priority for athletes arriving in national-team camps.
Article
Purpose: This study examined posttravel perceptual responses of national-team footballers (soccer) following different flight paths, arrival/departure times, and trip contexts. Methods: Details of 396 flights from national-team players (N = 68) were obtained and verified via an online flight database. Each player provided ratings of perceptual fatigue, sleep, soreness, stress, and jet lag for 2 days before and after each trip. The flight path (continents of departure and arrival), travel context (into vs out of national team), and arrival and departure times were obtained for each trip. Linear mixed models compared the pretravel with posttravel change in perceptual responses based on flight path, context, and schedule. Results: Perceived jet-lag ratings were more responsive to travel variables (R2 = .48) than other perceptual ratings (R2 < .26). Travel from Asia to Europe (P < .05) and Europe to Australia (P < .001) had significantly higher jet-lag ratings than all other paths. Fatigue scores were worst following Asia to Europe (P < .05) and Europe to Australia (P < .05) travel, while sleep scores were worst following Europe to Australia travel (P < .01). Perceptual responses were poorer following travel from national team to club compared with all other travel contexts (P < .05). Arrival during the daytime (11 AM to 5 PM) resulted in better perceptual responses than early-morning or late-night arrivals (P < .05). Conclusions: Perceived jet-lag ratings are more responsive to travel demands than perceptual wellness scales in national-team football athletes. Poorer perceptual responses may be expected when travel is longer in nature, ends later in the day, or involves travel out of the national team back to club.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Long-haul transmeridian travel is known to cause disruptions to sleep and immune status, which may increase the risk of illness. Aim: This study aimed to determine the effects of long-haul northeast travel for competition on sleep, illness and preparedness in endurance athletes. Methods: Twelve trained (13.8 ± 3.2 training h/week) masters (age: 48 ± 14 years) triathletes were monitored for sleep (quantity via actigraphy and quality via self-report), mucosal immunity (salivary immunoglobulin-A) and stress (salivary cortisol) as well as self-reported illness, fatigue, recovery and preparedness. Baseline measures were recorded for 2 weeks prior to travel for all variables except for the saliva samples, which were collected on three separate days upon waking. Participants completed normal training during the baseline period. Measures were subsequently recorded before, during and after long-haul northeast travel from the Australian winter to the Hawaiian summer, and in the lead up to an Ironman 70.3 triathlon. Results: All comparisons are to baseline. There was a most likely decrease in sleep duration on the over-night flight (-4.8 ± 1.2 h; effect size; ±90% confidence limits = 3.06; ±1.26) and a very likely increase in sleep duration on the first night after arrival (0.7 ± 1.0 h; 1.15; ±0.92). After this time, sleep duration returned to baseline for several days until it was very likely decreased on the night prior to competition (-1.2 ± 1.0 h; 1.18; ±0.93). Nap duration was likely increased on the first day after arrival (36 ± 65 min; 3.90; ±3.70). There was also a likely increase in self-reported fatigue upon waking after the first night in the new destination (1.1 ± 1.6 AU; 0.54; ±0.41) and there were three athletes (25%) who developed symptoms of illness 3–5 days after arrival. There were no changes in sleep quality or mucosal measures across study. Discussion: Long-haul northeast travel from a cool to a hot environment had substantial influences on sleep and self-reported fatigue, but these alterations had returned to pre-departure baseline 48 h after arrival. Endurance athletes undertaking similar journeys may benefit from optimizing sleep hygiene, especially on the first 2 days after arrival, or until sleep duration and fatigue levels return to normal.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The magnitude of travel completed by professional Australian soccer teams during domestic competition is substantial. The inclusion of Australian soccer teams into the Asian Champions league has seen additional stress placed on soccer players' training and competition schedules. For management staff, the complexity of organizing training and travel schedules during domestic competition and the Asian Champions league is challenging. Design: Case study. Participants: Seven male professional soccer players (mean ± SD: age 25.2 ± 3.2 years, height 182.8 ± 5.2 cm, body mass 84.6 ± 7.4 kg). Measurements: This study examined the sleep and fatigue levels of Australian soccer players during an intensive home and away travel schedule during the Asian Champions league. Seven male professional soccer players' (mean ± SD: age 25.2 ± 3.2 years, height 182.8 ± 5.2 cm, body mass 84.6 ± 7.4 kg) sleep/wake behavior was assessed using sleep diaries and wrist activity monitors for 19 days, including 9 days before, 5 days during, and 4 days after a home and away group stage match of the Asian Champions league. Analyses examined differences in sleep/wake behavior and fatigue levels between day type (training day, rest day, pregame, and postgame) and between sleep location (Adelaide, during flight, and Hiroshima). Results: Sleep/wake behavior and fatigue levels were poorest the night immediately after games compared to the night before games, training days, and rest days. Soccer players' sleep/wake behaviors were disrupted during flights such that they obtained 3.6 hours less sleep during flights compared to sleep in Ad-elaide (7.0 ± 1.6 hours) and Hiroshima (7.0 ± 2.1 hours). Conclusion: The sleep/wake behaviors of professional soccer players are compromised when they are required to travel and compete in multiple matches within a short period of time. Crown
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Determine the recovery timeline of sleep, subjective jet-lag and fatigue, and team-sport physical performance following east and west long-haul travel. Methods: Ten, physically-trained males underwent testing at 09:00 (AM) and 17:00 (PM) local time on four consecutive days two weeks prior to outbound travel (BASE), and the first four days following 21 h of outbound (WEST) and return (EAST) air travel across eight time-zones between Australia and Qatar. Data collection included performance (countermovement jump [CMJ], 20-m sprint and Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery level 1 [YYIR1] test) and perceptual (jet-lag, motivation, perceived exertion and physical feeling) measures. In addition, sleep was measured via wrist activity monitors and self-report diaries throughout the aforementioned data collection periods. Results: Compared to the corresponding day at BASE, the reduction in YYIR1 distance following EAST was significantly different to the increase WEST on day 1 post-travel (p<0.001). On day 2, significantly slower 20-m sprint times were detected in EAST compared to WEST (p=0.03), with large effect sizes also indicating a greater reduction in YYIR1 distance in EAST compared to WEST (d=1.06). Mean sleep onset and offset were significantly later and mean time in bed and sleep duration were significantly reduced across the four days in EAST compared to BASE and WEST (p<0.05). Lastly, mean jet-lag, fatigue and motivation ratings across the four days were significantly worse in EAST compared to BASE and WEST (p<0.05), and WEST compared to BASE (p<0.05). Conclusions: Long-haul transmeridian travel can impede team-sport physical performance. Specifically, travel east has a greater detrimental effect on sleep, subjective jet-lag, fatigue and motivation. Consequently, maximal- and intermittent-sprint performance is also reduced following travel east, particularly within 72 h following arrival.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Describe the effects of eastward long-haul transmeridian air travel on subjective jet-lag, sleep and wellness in professional football (soccer) players prior to the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil. Design Single cohort involving twenty-three male professional football players representing a national football team. Methods Data was collected from players prior to and following international travel from Sydney, Australia to Vitoria, Brazil. In total there were three flights, 19-h and 14,695 km of travel east across 11 time-zones. Training load and wellness measures were obtained in the week prior to and following travel, whilst sleep and jet-lag measures were collected on the day prior to travel (Pre), the day of arrival and for five days following travel (Post 1 to 5). Results Compared to Pre, perceived jet-lag was significantly increased on Post 1 to 4, with significantly greater levels on Post 1 compared to Post 5 (p < 0.05). Self-reported sleep duration during travel was 5.9 (4.8-7.0) h, which was significantly lower than all other nights (p˂0.01), except for the night of arrival, where time in bed and sleep duration were significantly reduced compared to Post 1, 2, 3 and 4 (p˂0.01). Lastly, compared to the week prior to travel, mean wellness was significantly reduced during the week following travel (p˂0.01). Conclusions Self-reported sleep disruption during and following eastward long-haul transmeridian air travel, together with exacerbated jet-lag symptoms may result in reduced player wellness. Consequently, player preparedness for subsequent training and competition may be impeded, though physical performance data is lacking.
Article
Full-text available
The present study examined the sleep, travel and recovery responses of elite footballers during and following long-haul international air travel, with a further description of these responses over the ensuing competitive tour (including two matches). In an observational design, 15 elite male football players undertook 18 h of predominately westward international air travel from the United Kingdom to South America (-4 h time-zone shift) for a 10-day tour. Objective sleep parameters, external and internal training loads, subjective player match performance, technical match data and perceptual jet-lag and recovery measures were collected. Significant differences were evident between outbound travel and recovery night 1 (night of arrival; P<0.001) for sleep duration. Sleep efficiency was also significantly reduced during outbound travel compared to recovery nights 1 (P=0.001) and 2 (P=0.004). Furthermore, both match nights (5 and 10), showed significantly less sleep than non-match nights 2-4 and 7-9 (all P<0.001). No significant differences were evident between baseline and any time point for all perceptual measures of jet-lag and recovery (P>0.05); although large effects were evident for jet-lag on Day 2 (two days after arrival). Sleep duration is truncated during long-haul international travel with a 4 h time-zone delay, and following night matches in elite footballers. However this lost sleep appeared to have a limited effect on perceptual recovery, which may be explained by a westbound flight and a relatively small change in time-zones, in addition to the significant increase in sleep duration on the night of arrival following the long-haul flight.
Article
Full-text available
The available scientific research regarding injury prevention practices in international football is sparse. The purpose of this study was to quantify current practice with regard to (1) injury prevention of top-level footballers competing in an international tournament, and (2) determine the main challenges and issues faced by practitioners in these national teams. A survey was administered to physicians of the 32 competing national teams at the FIFA 2014 World Cup. The survey included 4 sections regarding perceptions and practices concerning non-contact injuries: (1) risk factors, (2) screening tests and monitoring tools, (3) preventative strategies and (4) reflection on their experience at the World Cup. Following responses from all teams (100%), the present study revealed the most important intrinsic (previous injury, accumulated fatigue, agonist:antagonist muscle imbalance) and extrinsic (reduced recovery time, training load prior to and during World Cup, congested fixtures) risk factors during the FIFA 2014 World Cup. The 5 most commonly used tests for risk factors were: flexibility, fitness, joint mobility, balance and strength; monitoring tools commonly used were: medical screen, minutes/matches played, subjective and objective wellness, heart rate and biochemical markers. The 5 most important preventative exercises were: flexibility, core, combined contractions, balance and eccentric. The present study showed that many of the National football (soccer) teams' injury prevention perceptions and practices follow a coherent approach. There remains, however, a lack of consistent research findings to support some of these perceptions and practices. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Article
This study examined sleep-wake habits and subjective jet-lag ratings of 55 German junior rowers (n = 30 male, 17.8 ± 0.5 years) before and during the World Rowing Junior Championships 2015 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Athletes answered sleep logs every morning, and Liverpool John Moore's University Jet-Lag Questionnaires each evening and morning. Following an 11-h westward flight with 5-h time shift, advanced bedtimes (-1 h, P < .001, ηp(2) = 0.68), reduced sleep onset latency (P = .002, ηp(2) = 0.53) and increased sleep duration (P < .001, ηp(2) = 0.60) were reported for the first two nights. Jet-lag symptoms peaked upon arrival but were still present after 6 days. Sleep quality improved (P < .001, ηp(2) = 0.31) as well as some scales of the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes. Participation was successful as indicated by 11 of 13 top 3 placings. Overall, the initial desynchronisation did not indicate negative impacts on competition performance. As travel fatigue probably had a major effect on perceptual decrements, sleep during travel and time to recover upon arrival should be emphasised. Coaches and practitioners should consider higher sleep propensity in the early evening by scheduling training sessions and meetings until the late afternoon.
Article
This study investigated exposure to periods of match congestion in regular starter players in a professional soccer team across 4 competitive seasons (2009-2013). Players were divided into 2 groups: club players (club match exposure only, n = 41) and national team players (club and national team exposure, n = 22). The frequency of congested periods that players were potentially exposed to per season was initially determined: 2-match cycles - potential exposure to 2 successive matches separated by a ≤ 3-day interval calculated immediately from the end of play in match 1 to the start of play in match 2 occurred on 12.5 ± 5.1 and 16.0 ± 4.7 occasions for club and national team players, respectively. Multiple-match cycles: potential exposure to 3-, 4-, 5- or 6-matches played successively within a ≤ 4-day period commencing from the day after each match occurred on 8.5 ± 2.1, 4.3 ± 1.7, 3.0 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.5 occasions for club and 11.5 ± 2.4, 6.5 ± 0.6, 4.5 ± 1.9 and 3.0 ± 1.4 occasions for national team players, respectively. With regard to actual exposure in club and national team players, respectively, participation in both matches in 2-match cycles attained 61.2% and 59.3% while 90-min play in both matches was only completed on 38.2% and 40.5% of occasions and ≥75-min play on 47.6% and 50.0% of occasions, despite availability to play in both groups being >86%. While availability to play in all players was frequently >70% for multiple-match cycles, a trend was observed for a sharp decline in participation as the number of matches in the cycles increased. Therefore, the present players were not extensively exposed to periods of fixture congestion.
Article
Background: Travelling across multiple time zones disrupts normal circadian rhythms and induces “jet lag”. Possible effects of this on training and performance in athletes were concerns before the Sydney Olympic Games. Objective: To identify some determinants of jet lag and its symptoms. Methods: A mixture of athletes, their coaches, and academics attending a conference (n = 85) was studied during their flights from the United Kingdom to Australia (two flights with a one hour stopover in Singapore), and for the first six days in Australia. Subjects differed in age, sex, chronotype, flexibility of sleeping habits, feelings of languor, fitness, time of arrival in Australia, and whether or not they had previous experience of travel to Australia. These variables and whether the body clock adjusted to new local time by phase advance or delay were tested as predictors for jet lag and some of its symptoms by stepwise multiple regression analyses. Results: The amount of sleep in the first flight was significantly greater in those who had left the United Kingdom in the evening than the morning (medians of 5.5 hours and 1.5 hours respectively; p = 0.0002, Mann-Whitney), whereas there was no significant difference on the second flight (2.5 hours v 2.8 hours; p = 0.72). Only the severity of jet lag and assessments of sleep and fatigue were commonly predicted significantly (p<0.05) by regression analysis, and then by only some of the variables. Thus increasing age and a later time of arrival in Australia were associated with less jet lag and fatigue, and previous experience of travel to Australia was associated with an earlier time of getting to sleep. Subjects who had adjusted by phase advance suffered worse jet lag during the 5th and 6th days in Australia. Conclusions: These results indicate the importance of an appropriate choice of itinerary and lifestyle for reducing the negative effects of jet lag in athletes and others who wish to perform optimally in the new time zone.