ArticlePDF Available

Educational Success and Social Participation of Socially and Educationally Disadvantaged Students with Migration Background in Extended Education

Educational Success and Social Participation of Socially and Educationally
Disadvantaged Students with Migration Background in Extended Education
Haiqin Ning, Jule Schmidt, Nanine Lilla, MarianneSchüpbach
The project is funded within the Framework Programme for Empirical Educational Re-
searchof the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under the funding code
01JB2112 A-C. Project duration: 01. 10.202130.09.2024. As acollaborative project, there
are three partners working together:
Team Freie Universität Berlin: Prof. Dr. MarianneSchüpbach (Coordinator of the col-
laborative research project), Dr. Nanine Lilla, Haiqin Ning, Jule Schmidt, Dr. Jan Willem
Nieuwenboom, Hanna Lehmkuhl, Magdalena Reichenbach|Primary Education, Berlin
Team Universität Hamburg: Prof. Dr. Ingrid Gogolin, Luise Krejcik, Tobias Potthoff |
General, Intercultural and International Comparative Education, Hamburg
Team German Children and Youth Foundation: Anna-Margarete Davis, Dr. Alexander
Wedel |School Success &All-Day School as well as Research &Development, Berlin
Starting Position
Transforming half-day schools into all-day schools (i. e. aform of extendededucation)isoften
seen as away to deal with thechallenges addressedtothe German education system. Recent
research shows that first- and second-generation migrant children in Germany continue to be
at adisadvantage throughout their educational pathway, and oftenintwo senses: through their
social background (e.g. low-income, low SES, rural areas) and their migration background
(e.g. cultural and linguistic minority) (e. g. Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung, 2020;
Köller et al., 2019).
All-day schools are expected to achieve measurable improvements in the educational
success and social participation of students with amigration background (KMK, 2015), who
are often if not always also living in sociallyprecarious circumstances. It is evident that the
extra-curricular offerings of all-day schools are used by students at the primary level in
Germany (Steiner, 2009; Willems et al., 2014). However, these expectations for all-day
schools have not been adequately fulfilled in Germany, e. g. no direct effects on subject-
related learning have been proven (StEG Consortium, 2016). Regarding the question of how
all-day school settings can contribute to reducing disadvantages in respect of linguistic,
cultural, and social heterogeneity, there is not much research-based knowledgeavailable in the
German context (Reinders et al., 2011; Bremm, 2018).
International Journal forResearch on Extended Education, Vol. 10,Issue 1/2022, 7578
In other countries, however, there are comparable high-quality offerings of extended
education that have been shown to be effective. Findings from studies in the US indicate that
participation in high-quality afterschool programs over alonger period of time, which are
comparabletoall-day schools, leads to higher scores in achievement tests than non-partic-
ipation (Durlak et al. 2010; Vandell et al., 2015). In their meta-analysis (based on 68 studies),
Durlak et al. (2010) emphasize that programsthat are sequential, active, focused,and explicit
(SAFE) are effective both in terms of subject-related and non-academic competencies. The
meta-analysis by Lauer et al. (2006)also shows that the disadvantaged students in particular
benefit from participationinspecific intervention programs. In South Korea, participation in
afterschool programs has been shown to have apositive effect on subject-related performance
especially for socially and educationally disadvantaged students (Bae et al., 2010).
Against this background, there is assumed potential in the German all-day school settings.
The question arises whether the existing offerings can be optimized by incorporating em-
pirical findings from international contexts on such learning settings as well as conditions for
their successfulimplementation.
Therefore, the objective of the project is to harness empirical findings and knowledge
from other national contexts to better exploit the potential of all-day schools in Germany as
well. Socially and educationally disadvantaged students with migration background are the
target group of this project with aspecial focus on primary schools.
Theoretical framework
Based on research questions, several theoretical frameworks are referred to in this research
project. In international contexts, there are many different forms of extended education, which
can differ considerably in their design. The characterization tool and aspects of charac-
terization according to Schüpbach (2018, p. 137) serve as abasis for characterizing the
current offerings in Germany and in other countries. The basic points are
(a) What is the (age) range of the participants?
(b) What is the focus?
(c) What form does it take?
(d) When does it take place?
(e) Who is the provider?
(f) Where is it located?
(g) Who participates?
(h) What is the professional background of the staff?
(i) Who pays the costs?
Based on this tool, different forms of extended education in the (inter)national fields can be
described in its current basic features.
The concept of educational quality is based on the work of Tietze et al. (2005). In their
German version of the School-Age Care Environment Rating Scale (SACERS) by Harms et
al. (2013) in German Hort- und Ganztagsangeboteskala(HUGS) Tietze et al. (2005)
describe three levels of educational quality: The educational process quality is placed in the
International Journal forResearch on Extended Education, Vol. 10,Issue 1/2022, 757876
center, which includes aspects of the offering concept,such as the spatial and material
equipment, moreoverall interactions that promote education and development of the students.
The educational processesare framed by the structural quality and orientation quality: While
the structural quality includes the conditions of the learning environment, which are mainly
politically regulated (e. g. group size and composition, qualification of the pedagogical staff),
the level of orientation quality refers to aspects of the educational attitude of the pedagogical
staff (Tietze et al., 2005).
At the same time, theempirical, interdisciplinary, and action-oriented project follows the
rationale of co-construction of innovation (Maasen,2020) for the transfer of scientific
findings to school practice. The German Childrenand Youth Foundation is acollaborative
partner. Cooperation with the service agencies Ganztägig lernen(All-Day learning) as well
as the participating federal states, in particular their education administrations, will already
start at an early stage of the project. This enables acontinuousreview of preconditions for the
implementation of the created concepts and products in school practice.
The project is designed as aqualitative study, which is divided into four phases and utilizes
different methods to collect and analyze empirical data.
In the first phase, all-day primary schools in Germany are characterized with aspecial
focus on the target group (Schüpbach, 2018). On this basis, (inter)national experts are going to
be interviewed and evaluate the current implementationinGermany with regard to learning
settings and necessary conditions of high-quality learning settings of the extra-curricular
offerings in all-day primary schools.
In the secondphase, (inter)national experts receive asummary of the assessments from all
experts concerning the offerings currently implemented in the German context for asecond
evaluation. Then, the evaluations of the(inter)national experts are analyzed in asequential
procedure with the help of qualitative content analysis (Mayring, 2014).
In the third phase, theinsights gained are to be discussed in focus groupsconsisting of
German practitioners (e. g. education administrators, educational institutions and extra-
curricular cooperation partners, school principals, teachers, and other educational staff) with a
view to transferring them into innovative concepts, measures, and products in the German
context (Morgan,1997). The focus group discussions are also to be analyzed using qualitative
content analysis.
In the fourth phase, these concepts will be developed and their suitability for the local
context will be tested together with German practitioners and transfer partners at selected all-
day primary schools in four federal states of Germany. Afinal survey with schools and their
cooperationpartners aims at generating assessments of whether the concepts and measures
developed are practicable and purposeful.
77H. Ning, J. Schmidt, N. Lilla, M. Schüpbach: Educational Success and Social Participation
Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung. (2020). Bildung in Deutschland 2020: Ein in-
dikatorengestützter Bericht mit einer Analyse zu Bildung in einer digitalisierten We lt. wbv Media.
Bae, S., Oh, H., Kim, H., Lee, C., &Oh, B. (2010). The impact of after-school programs on educational
equality and private tutoring expenses. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(3), 349361.
Bremm, N. (2018). Schulen mit ganztägigem Angebot. Eine empirisch ermittelte Typologie. Weinheim
München: Beltz Juventa.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., &Pachan, M. (2010). Ameta-analysis of after-school programs that seek
to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 45(34), 294309.
Harms, T., Jacobs, E. V., &White, D. R. (2013). School-Age CareEnvironment Rating Scale, updated
edition (SACERS). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Köller, O., Klieme, E., Reiss, K., &Weis, M. (2019). PISA 2018: Grundbildung im internationalen
Ve rgleich. Waxmann Verlag. KMK.
(2015). Ganztagsschulen in Deutschland: Bericht der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 03. 12. 2015.
Köller, O., Klieme, E., Reiss, K. &Weis, M. (Ed.). (2019). PISA 2018. Grundbildung im internationalen
Ve rgleich. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., &Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-
of-School-Time Programs: AMeta-Analysis of Effects for At-Risk Students. Review of Educational
Research, 76(2), 275313.
Maasen, S. (2020). Innovation und Relevanz. Forschung im Gerangel widerstreitender Anforderungen.
In A. M. Horatschek (Ed.), Competing knowledges Wissen im Widerstreit (pp. 123140). De
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software
solution. SSOAR.
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd. ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Reinders, H., Gogolin, I., Gresser, A., Schnurr, S., Böhmer, J., &Bremm, N. (2011). Ganztags-
schulbesuch und Integration von Kindern mit Migrationshintergrund im Primarbereich: Erste
Näherungen an empirische Befunde einer vergleichenden Untersuchung. ZeitschriftFür Erzie-
hungswissenschaft(Sonderband 14), 163183.
Schüpbach, M. (2018). Useful terms in English for the field of extended education and acharacter-
ization of the field from aSwiss perspective. International Journal for Research on Extended
Education, 6(2), 132143.
StEG-Konsortium. (2016). Ganztagsschule: Bildungsqualität und Wirkungen außerunterrichtlicher
Angebote. Ergebnisse der Studie zur Entwicklung von Ganztagsschulen 20122015. DIPF.
Steiner, C. (2009). Mehr Chancengleichheit durch die Ganztagsschule? Zeitschriftfür Pädagogik (54.
Beiheft), 81105.
Tietze, W., Roßbach, H.G., Stendel, M., &Wellner, B. (2005). Hort- und Ganztagsangebote-Skala
(HUGS): Feststellung und Unterstützung pädagogischer Qualität in Horten und
Außerunterrichtlichen Angeboten. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Vandell, D. L., Larson, R. W., Mahoney, J. L., &Watts, T. W. (2015). ChildrensOrganized Activities.
Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (7), 140.
Willems, A.S., Wendt, H., Gröhlich, C., Walzebug, A. &Bos, W. (2014). Mehr Chancengerechtigkeit
durch die Ganztagsschule?InH.G. Holtappels et al. (Ed.), Jahrbuch der Schulentwicklung.
Band 18. Daten, Beispiele und Perspektiven (S. 62100). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
International Journal forResearch on Extended Education, Vol. 10,Issue 1/2022, 757878
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Full-text available
In science policy, current concepts like “Responsible Research and Innovation” or “Citizen Science” document a new understanding of the relationship between science and society: Beyond being innovative, science should also engender an entirely new responsive, participatory, and sustainable research culture. Simultaneously, civil society has been demanding a responsible science as well as citizen participation for some time. These expectations manifest in increasing evaluations, selective research funding and demands for relevance and usefulness, producing new research formats. By way of two instructive examples - the Human Brain Project and Citizen Science -, this contribution asks whether we are on our way to a new ‘contract’ between science and society, in which science has to be legitimated through innovations that are characterised by excellence and relevance. My conclusion is: Excellence and relevance cannot be readily reconciled, but they are related to each other through pragmatic compromises (managerialisation, public engagement).
Full-text available
In the last 20 years, interest in the field of extended education has been growing worldwide. Countries in the East and the West have been investing in developing systems to support student learning after traditional school hours. In this contribution, we first clarify concepts and terms currently used in Switzerland and then, from an international point of view, focus on possible useful terms in this new field in English. In the third part, we attempt to outline the field of extended education by means of basic points, illustrated using Switzerland as an example.
Full-text available
Der Beitrag berichtet erste Befunde einer Studie bei Ganztags- und Halbtagsschülern in Bayern und Hamburg. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Frage, inwieweit Ganztagsschulen eine bessere soziale Integration von Migrantenkindern und eine günstigere Entwicklung der Sprachkompetenz im Deutschen ermöglichen als Halbtagsschulen. Basierend auf einem Modell der Schuleffektivität werden neben dem Schultyp auch Faktoren der ethnischen Komposition der Schülerschaft und des Förderangebots der Schulen als mögliche erklärende Variablen in Mehrebenenanalysen herangezogen. Der Längsschnitt mit Messzeitpunkten in der ersten und zweiten Klasse umfasst insgesamt 775 Schüler an 29 Schulen. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf, dass nicht der besuchte Schultyp, sondern die Zusammensetzung der Schülerschaft Varianz bei den abhängigen Variablen erklärt. Zugleich zeigt sich die begrenzte Aussagekraft von formalen Merkmalen der Unterscheidung zwischen Ganz- und Halbtagsschulen. Abstract The paper presents first results of a longitudinal study conducted at full-time and part-time schools in Hamburg and Bavaria. The major interest of this research is whether or not full-time schools provide better opportunities for the social integration of students and the development of language competence in German. According to a model of school effectiveness, ethnic composition of students and support programs for intercultural learning and acquisition of German are used as predictors to explain differences between students in the domains of social integration and language competence. Multi-level analyses with 775 students at 29 schools were conducted and results indicate that composition of students partly explains differences in the dependent variables. At the same time the severe limitations of the analyses of formal features that differentiate between full-time and part-time schooling become obvious.
Full-text available
Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution Mayring, Philipp Erstveröffentlichung / Primary Publication Monographie / monograph Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Mayring, Philipp : Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt, 2014. URN: Nutzungsbedingungen: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden Sie hier: Terms of use: This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Attribution Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information see:
Qualitative Content Analysis designates a bundle of text analysis procedures integrating qualitative and quantitative steps of analysis, which makes it an approach of mixed methods. This contribution defines it with a background of quantitative content analysis and compares it with other social science text analysis approaches (e.g. Grounded Theory). The basic theoretical and methodological assumptions are elaborated: reference to a communication model, rule orientation of analysis, theoretical background of those content analytical rules, categories in the center of the procedure, necessity of pilot testing of categories and rules, necessity of intra- and inter-coder reliability checks. Then the two main procedures, inductive category formation and deductive category assignment, are described by step models. Finally the procedures are compared with similar techniques (e.g. codebook analysis) and strengths and weaknesses are discussed.
Organized activities (including afterschool programs, extracurricular activities, sports, community service, summer camps, and other activities outside of the regular school day) account for a significant segment of children and adolescents' lives. These activities often provide hands-on, child-driven experiential learning that often involve youth working collaboratively with peers. Although research on organized activities is comparatively recent, it suggests that these types of activities support the development of self-direction, initiative, teamwork, and emotional skills, as well as cognitive and academic skills. In this chapter, bioecological and sociocultural theories are used to guide our understanding of organized activities. Methodological strategies and common assessments used to study organized activities are reviewed. Key parameters and processes, including dosage, type of activities, and program quality, are described. We consider individual, family, peer, and school/community factors that predict participation in organized activities. We also evaluate evidence of links between organized activities and child developmental outcomes. Finally, youth experiences and outcomes associated with unsupervised settings are juxtaposed to experiences and outcomes found in organized activities.
The purpose of this study was to examine how the implementation of after-school programs in Korea’s public schools is related to educational equality and private tutoring expenses. The analyzed data was from the Survey on the Status of Private Tutoring and the Study of the Policy Measures to Reduce Private Tutoring Expenses conducted by KEDI (Korea Education Development Institute) in (International conference for exploring the ways to activate the after-school program, KEDI, Seoul, 2007). The Chi-square test was employed to investigate (a) the relationship between after-school participation and family income and residential location of students (b) the association between after-school engagement and the reduction in private tutoring expenses. The study found that: (a) in general, low-income and rural students participated more than higher income and urban peers in after-school programs and (b) after-school participation was generally negatively associated with private tutoring engagement and the impact of after-school participation on the reduction in private tutoring expenses was stronger for low-income students in elementary and high schools and rural students in high schools. The overall findings provide further research issue regarding whether after-school programs can help foster educational equality by offering more opportunities for learning and achievement improvement for disadvantaged students. The results also imply the potential of after-school programs in reducing private tutoring expenses, particularly for low-income families. KeywordsAfter-school programs-Educational equality-Private tutoring