PresentationPDF Available

On the reliability of dive computer generated run times: the 2022 synopsis of our 9-part series with dive computer evaluations

  • November 2022
DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.34921.98406
  • Conference: TEC 4.0: update ETH/IL
Authors:
Miri Rosenblat at Tel Aviv University
Miri Rosenblat
Download file PDFDownload file PDF
Read file
Download citation

Abstract

On the reliability of dive computer generated run times: the 2022 synopsis of our 9-part series with dive computer evaluations, we give a brief overview, summarize our results and list all the topics / references so far. During 2021 & 2022 we presented these results at various „TEC 4.0: update-meetings“ in (alphabetical order): Athens (GR), Constance (DE), Eilat (IL) and Tel Aviv (IL) for researchers, divers and instructors, diving physicians & diving contractors and made them visible thereafter @ RESEARCHGATE. During the previous 9 parts ([1] to [9] and all the references therein), we observed by some of the dive computer manufacturers deviations from documented algorithms/decompression models. Up to now, these deviations have never been systematically analyzed nor is there any complete documentation from the dive computer manufacturers publicly available.
run-times_referenc
es.pdf
Content uploaded by Miri Rosenblat
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Miri Rosenblat on Dec 23, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Run_Times_Synopsis_20
22.pdf
Content uploaded by Miri Rosenblat
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Miri Rosenblat on Nov 11, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
On the reliability of dive computer
generated run-times: Synopsis
References:
[1] Salm, A. (26.07.2021)
On the reliability of dive computer generated run-times, Part I;
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16260.65929
[2] Salm, A. (11.01.2022)
On the reliability of dive computer generated run-times, Part II;
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11343.41126
[3] Salm, A. (02.02.2022)
On the reliability of dive computer generated run-times, Part III;
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21973.50405
[4] Salm, A. (22.02.2022)
On the reliability of dive computer generated run-times, Part IV;
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11469.72169
[5] Salm, A. (07.02.2022)
On the reliability of dive computer generated run-times, Part V;
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18129.81763
2
On the reliability of dive computer
generated run-times: Synopsis
References:
[6] Rosenblat, M. ;Vered, N.; Eisenstein, Y.; Salm A. (23.02.2022)
On the reliability of dive computer generated run-times, Part VI;
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36242.32969
[7] Salm, A. (2021) Synopsis & Fact Sheet
DIVE Version 3_11,
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17024.56326
[8] Salm, A. (2022) Recovery of selected ZH-86 air-diving schedules via a
decompression shareware
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34235.13609
[9] Salm, A. (2012) Variations in the TTS: where do they come from?
International Journal of the Society for Underwater Technology, Vol 31, No 1,
pp 43–47
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.