A preview of this full-text is provided by Optica Publishing Group.
Content available from Optics Letters
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Letter Vol. 48,No. 1 /1 January 2023 / Optics Letters 127
Temporal coherence in an unbalanced SU(1,1)
interferometer
Yunxiao Zhang,1Nan Huo,1Liang Cui,1Xueshi Guo,1Xiaoying Li,1,∗AND Z. Y. Ou2,3
1College of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronics Information Technology, Ministry of
Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2Department of Physics, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
3e-mail: jeffou@cityu.edu.hk
*Corresponding author: xiaoyingli@tju.edu.cn
Received 11 July 2022; revised 27 October 2022; accepted 31 October 2022; posted 9 November 2022; published 22 December 2022
In classical coherence theory, coherence time is typically
related to the bandwidth of the optical field. Narrowing the
bandwidth by optical filtering will result in the lengthening
of the coherence time. In the case of a delayed pulse photon
interference, this will lead to pulse overlap and recovery of
interference, which is otherwise absent due to time delay.
However, this is changed for entangled optical fields. In this
Letter, we investigate how the temporal coherence of the
fields in a pulse-pumped SU(1,1) interferometer changes
with the bandwidth of optical filtering. We find that the
effect of optical filtering is not similar to the classical coher-
ence theory in the presence of quantum entanglement. A full
quantum theory is presented and can explain the phenom-
ena well. © 2022 Optica Publishing Group
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.470115
In quantum mechanics, indistinguishability is a fundamental
concept for quantum interference. When there exist distinguish-
able paths for two interfering fields, no interference can occur.
This is at the heart of Bohr’s complementarity principle for
quantum interference [1]. However, path distinguishability can
be erased by projection measurement in quantum erasers [2,3].
This erasure of distinguishability can also be achieved in the
measurement process. For example, optical filtering can increase
the coherence time of an optical field. In an interference experi-
ment involving optical pulses, when optical delay is introduced
to achieve distinguishability in time, no interference occurs by
direct detection. However, placing a narrowband filter in front of
the detector can erase the temporal distinguishability by length-
ening the pulse and recover the interference effect. This is what
leads to the important concept of coherence time in classical
coherence theory. Coherence time is the time interval in which
an optical field keeps its phase correlation and, according to the
classical coherence theory, it is typically related to the reciprocal
bandwidth of an optical field [4] and can be lengthened by opti-
cal filtering. Indeed, a Gaussian-shaped field passing through
a filter of Gaussian profile of width σfhas its coherence time
changed from its original Tcto
T′
c=T2
c+1/σ2
f.(1)
However, there exists quantum entanglement for quantum
fields. The strong quantum correlations between two entangled
fields can lead to disappearance of interference in one field from
the distinguishability of the other [5,6] and recovery of inter-
ference by erasure of this distinguishability through projection
measurement [2,3]. Moreover, it is even possible to remotely
manipulate the coherence property of one field by controlling
the other entangled field [7]. All this poses a challenge for the
aforementioned traditional concept of coherence time as related
to the reciprocal bandwidth of the field.
An SU(1,1) interferometer is an interferometer involving
quantum entanglement, which is a perfect platform for this
study. It uses parametric amplifiers (PAs) to replace beam split-
ters in traditional classical interferometers [8,9]. The signal and
idler fields generated in the PA were shown to be entangled to
each other [7,10,11], and are used to probe phase changes in
the interferometer [12]. Such a novel quantum interferometer
has recently been widely applied to quantum imaging, quantum
sensing, quantum state engineering, and quantum measurement
[7,9,12]. Because of the involvement of two-partite quantum
entanglement in the interferometer, its properties can be quite
different from a traditional classical interferometer [12].
In this Letter, we investigate how optical filtering can affect the
performance of an unbalanced pulsed SU(1,1) quantum inter-
ferometer where a recent experiment demonstrated the loss of
interference in direct intensity detection due to temporal distin-
guishability but recovery of interference by homodyne detection
[13]. A question arises naturally about whether an optical filter
can be placed in front of the detector to recover interference in
direct intensity measurement in the unbalanced SU(1,1) inter-
ferometer, in a similar way to a traditional interferometer. Our
investigation finds that the effect of optical filtering plays out
differently under different pumping conditions and for delays in
different fields (signal or idler) in the interferometer. We investi-
gate in both theory and experiment what parameters determine
the appearance of interference. Our investigation is useful for the
application of an SU(1,1) interferometer, in which the sample
length makes the two arms between two PAs unequal.
The experimental setup of our SU(1,1) interferometer is
shown in Fig. 1(a). The two parametric amplifiers (PA1,PA2)
are based on pulse-pumped four-wave mixing (FWM) in
dispersion-shifted fibers (DSF1, DSF2). PA1 functions as a wave
0146-9592/23/010127-04 Journal ©2023 Optica Publishing Group
Corrected 5 January 2023