ArticlePDF Available

Safety Monitoring of Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Booster Doses Among Persons Aged ≥12 Years — United States, August 31–October 23, 2022

Authors:

Abstract

On August 31, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized bivalent formulations of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccines; these vaccines include mRNA encoding the spike protein from the original (ancestral) strain of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) and from the B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variants BA.4 and BA.5 (BA.4/BA.5). These bivalent mRNA vaccines were authorized for use as a single booster dose ≥2 months after completion of primary series or monovalent booster vaccination; Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent booster was authorized for persons aged ≥12 years and Moderna for adults aged ≥18 years.*,† On September 1, 2022, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that all persons aged ≥12 years receive an age-appropriate bivalent mRNA booster dose.§ To characterize the safety of bivalent mRNA booster doses, CDC reviewed adverse events and health impacts reported after receipt of bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna booster doses during August 31-October 23, 2022, to v-safe,¶ a voluntary smartphone-based U.S. safety surveillance system established by CDC to monitor adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination, and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS),** a U.S. passive vaccine safety surveillance system managed by CDC and FDA (1). During August 31-October 23, 2022, approximately 14.4 million persons aged ≥12 years received a bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech booster dose, and 8.2 million adults aged ≥18 years received a bivalent Moderna booster dose.†† Among the 211,959 registrants aged ≥12 years who reported receiving a bivalent booster dose to v-safe, injection site and systemic reactions were frequently reported in the week after vaccination (60.8% and 54.8%, respectively); fewer than 1% of v-safe registrants reported receiving medical care. VAERS received 5,542 reports of adverse events after bivalent booster vaccination among persons aged ≥12 years; 95.5% of reports were nonserious and 4.5% were serious events. Health care providers and patients can be reassured that adverse events reported after a bivalent booster dose are consistent with those reported after monovalent doses. Health impacts after COVID-19 vaccination are less frequent and less severe than those associated with COVID-19 illness (2).
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / November 4, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 44 1401
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Safety Monitoring of Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Booster Doses Among
Persons Aged ≥12 Years — United States, August 31–October 23, 2022
Anne M. Hause, PhD1; Paige Marquez, MSPH1; Bicheng Zhang, MS1; Tanya R. Myers, PhD1; Julianne Gee, MPH1; John R. Su, MD, PhD1;
Phillip G. Blanc, MD2; Alisha Thomas, MD2; Deborah Thompson, MD2; Tom T. Shimabukuro, MD1; David K. Shay, MD1
On August 31, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) authorized bivalent formulations of BNT162b2
(Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19
vaccines; these vaccines include mRNA encoding the spike
protein from the original (ancestral) strain of SARS-CoV-2
(the virus that causes COVID-19) and from the B.1.1.529
(Omicron) variants BA.4 and BA.5 (BA.4/BA.5). These
bivalent mRNA vaccines were authorized for use as a single
booster dose ≥2 months after completion of primary series
or monovalent booster vaccination; Pfizer-BioNTech biva-
lent booster was authorized for persons aged ≥12 years and
Moderna for adults aged ≥18 years.*,† On September 1, 2022,
the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
recommended that all persons aged ≥12 years receive an age-
appropriate bivalent mRNA booster dose.§ To characterize
the safety of bivalent mRNA booster doses, CDC reviewed
adverse events and health impacts reported after receipt of
bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna booster doses during
August 31–October 23, 2022, to v-safe, a voluntary smart-
phone-based U.S. safety surveillance system established by
CDC to monitor adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination,
and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS),**
a U.S. passive vaccine safety surveillance system managed by
CDC and FDA (1). During August 31–October 23, 2022,
approximately 14.4 million persons aged ≥12 years received a
bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech booster dose, and 8.2 million adults
aged ≥18 years received a bivalent Moderna booster dose.††
Among the 211,959 registrants aged ≥12 years who reported
receiving a bivalent booster dose to v-safe, injection site and
systemic reactions were frequently reported in the week after
vaccination (60.8% and 54.8%, respectively); fewer than 1%
of v-safe registrants reported receiving medical care. VAERS
received 5,542 reports of adverse events after bivalent booster
vaccination among persons aged ≥12 years; 95.5% of reports
were nonserious and 4.5% were serious events. Health care
providers and patients can be reassured that adverse events
* https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/144636/download
§ https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-
considerations-us.html
https://vsafe.cdc.gov/en
** https://vaers.hhs.gov
†† https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccination-demographic (Accessed
October 23, 2022).
reported after a bivalent booster dose are consistent with
those reported after monovalent doses. Health impacts after
COVID-19 vaccination are less frequent and less severe than
those associated with COVID-19 illness (2).
The v-safe system allows existing registrants to report receipt
of a COVID-19 booster dose and new registrants to enter infor-
mation about all doses received; registrants can also indicate
whether any other vaccines were administered during the same
visit. On September 2, 2022, v-safe was modified to allow par-
ticipants to enter up to 6 doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. Health
surveys sent daily during the first week after administration
of each dose include questions about local injection site and
systemic reactions and health impacts experienced; registrants
can provide additional information about these reactions or
health impacts via free text message.§§ CDC’s v-safe call center
staff members contact registrants who indicate that medical
care was received after vaccination to request more informa-
tion; registrants are also encouraged to complete a VAERS
report, if indicated.
VAERS accepts reports of postvaccination adverse events
from health care providers, vaccine manufacturers, and mem-
bers of the public.¶¶ Signs and symptoms and diagnostic
findings in VAERS reports are assigned Medical Dictionary
for Regulatory Activities preferred terms (MedDRA PTs) by
VAERS staff members.*** Reports of serious events to VAERS
during August 31–October 23, 2022, were reviewed by CDC
physicians to form a consensus clinical impression based on
available data.††† Death certificates and autopsy reports were
requested for any report of death. CDC physicians reviewed
§§ Children and adolescents aged ≤15 years must be enrolled by a parent or
guardian. Health check-ins are sent via text messages that link to web-based
surveys on days 0–7 after vaccination; then weekly through 6 weeks after
vaccination; and then 3, 6, and 12 months after vaccination.
¶¶ Under emergency use authorization regulations, health care providers are
required to report certain adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination to
VAERS, including death (https://vaers.hhs.gov/faq.html). VAERS forms ask
for patient, vaccine, administration, and adverse event information. https://
vaers.hhs.gov/docs/VAERS%202.0_Checklist.pdf
*** Each VAERS report might be assigned more than one MedDRA PT. A
MedDRA-coded event does not indicate a medically confirmed diagnosis.
https://www.meddra.org/how-to-use/basics/hierarchy
††† VAERS reports are classified as serious (based on FDA C.F.R. Title 21) if
any of the following are reported: hospitalization, prolongation of
hospitalization, life-threatening illness, permanent disability, congenital
anomaly or birth defect, or death. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/
cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
1402 MMWR / November 4, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 44 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
all available information for each decedent to form an impres-
sion about the cause of death. Using selected MedDRA PTs, a
search was performed to identify possible cases of myocarditis,
a rare adverse event that has been associated with mRNA
COVID-19 vaccines (2).
A bivalent booster dose in v-safe was defined as an age-
appropriate mRNA vaccine dose administered on or after
August 31, 2022, for registrants who had completed at least
a primary series (2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or
Novavax COVID-19 vaccine or 1 dose of Janssen [Johnson
& Johnson] vaccine). Local and systemic reactions and health
impacts reported during the week after a bivalent booster dose
vaccination were described for v-safe registrants aged ≥12 years
who received a bivalent booster dose during August 31–
October 23, 2022. VAERS adverse event reports after a bivalent
booster dose were described by serious and nonserious clas-
sification, demographic characteristics, and MedDRA PTs.
All analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.4;
SAS Institute). These surveillance activities were reviewed by
CDC and conducted consistent with applicable federal law
and CDC policy.§§§
Review of v-safe Data
During August 31–October 23, 2022, a total of 211,959 v-safe
registrants aged ≥12 years reported receiving an age-appropriate
bivalent booster dose (Table 1); 1,464 (0.7%) were aged
12–17 years, 68,592 (32.4%) were aged 18–49 years, 59,209
(27.9%) were aged 50–64 years, and 82.694 (39.0%) were aged
≥65 years. Most registrants indicated that a bivalent booster
dose was their fourth (96,241; 45.4%) or fifth (106,423;
50.2%) COVID-19 vaccine dose; 122,953 (58.0%) received
a Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent booster dose and 89,065 (42.0%)
received a Moderna bivalent booster dose. More than one third
(84,450; 39.8%) of registrants reported receiving at least one
other vaccination at the same visit as bivalent booster vaccina-
tion; 83,005 (98.3%) received influenza vaccine.
In the week after receipt of the bivalent booster dose, fre-
quency of reporting of local injection site reactions ranged
from 49.7% among adults aged ≥65 years to 72.9% among
adults aged 18–49 years; the prevalence of reported systemic
reactions ranged from 43.5% among adults aged ≥65 years to
67.9% among adults aged 18–49 years (Table 2). The most
frequently reported reactions among these age groups after
bivalent booster dose vaccination were injection site pain
(range = 45.0%–70.5%), fatigue (30.0%–53.1%), head-
ache (19.7%–42.8%), myalgia (20.3%–41.3%), and fever
(10.2%–26.3%).
§§§ 45 C.F.R. part 46, 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. Sect.
552a; 44 U.S.C. Sect. 3501 et seq.
TABLE 1. Demographic and vaccination characteristics of persons
aged ≥12 years* who reported receipt of a bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech
or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine booster dose to v-safe
United States, August 31–October 23, 2022
Characteristic
Vaccine, no. (%)
Pfizer-
BioNTech
n = 122,953
Moderna
n = 89,006
Total
N = 211,959
Sex
Female 77,913 (63.4) 56,651 (63.7) 134,564 (63.5)
Male 44,031 (35.8) 31,697 (35.6) 75,728 (35.7)
Unknown 1,009 (0.8) 658 (0.7) 1,667 (0.8)
Age group, yrs
12–17 1,464 (1.2) NA 1,464 (0.7)
18–49 41,022 (33.4) 27,570 (31.0) 68,592 (32.4)
50–64 34,947 (28.4) 24,262 (27.3) 59,209 (27.9)
≥65 45,520 (37.0) 37,174 (41.8) 82,694 (39.0)
Ethnicity
Hispanic 6,967 (5.7) 4,765 (5.4) 11,732 (5.5)
Non-Hispanic 112,895 (91.8) 82,009 (92.1) 194,904 (92.0)
Unknown 3,091 (2.5) 2,232 (2.5) 5,323 (2.5)
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native 441 (0.4) 328 (0.4) 769 (0.4)
Asian 6,884 (5.6) 4,750 (5.3) 11,634 (5.5)
Black or African American 6,574 (5.4) 4,583 (5.2) 11,157 (5.3)
Native Hawaiian or other
Pacific Islander
241 (0.2) 145 (0.2) 386 (0.2)
White 102,535 (83.4) 74,984 (84.3) 177,519 (83.8)
Multiracial 2,518 (2.1) 1,667 (1.9) 4,185 (2.0)
Other 1,873 (1.5) 1,262 (1.4) 3,135 (1.5)
Unknown 1,887 (1.5) 1,287 (1.5) 3,174 (1.5)
Total no. of COVID-19 vaccine doses received
2 86 (0.1) 52 (0.1) 138 (0.1)
3 4,919 (4.0) 3,186 (3.6) 8,105 (3.8)
4 57,603 (46.9) 38,638 (43.4) 96,241 (45.4)
5 59,807 (48.6) 46,616 (52.4) 106,423 (50.2)
6 538 (0.4) 514 (0.6) 1,052 (0.5)
Vaccine co-administration§
Yes 51,713 (42.1) 32,737 (36.8) 84,450 (39.8)
No 71,240 (57.9) 56,269 (63.2) 127,509 (60.2)
Abbreviation: NA = not applicable.
* On August 31, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration authorized bivalent
formulations of Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines for use as a
single booster dose ≥2 months after completing primary or booster
vaccination, Pfizer-BioNTech for persons aged ≥12 years and Moderna for
persons aged ≥18 years. In v-safe, a bivalent booster dose was defined as an
age-appropriate mRNA dose administered on or after August 31, 2022, for
registrants who completed a primary series (2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech,
Moderna, or Novavax COVID-19 vaccine or 1 dose of Janssen).
Includes registrants who completed at least one survey during days 0–7
postvaccination.
§ Other vaccines administered during the same visit.
Reported inability to complete normal daily activities ranged
from 10.6% among adults aged ≥65 years to 19.8% among
adults aged 18–49 years. Receipt of medical care was reported
by 0.8% of registrants; most received care via telehealth (0.3%)
or clinic (0.3%) appointment. Hospitalization was reported by
55 (0.03%) registrants. Among 45 registrants with information
about the hospitalization available from the v-safe call center or
free text message response, 29 indicated that the hospitalization
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / November 4, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 44 1403
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
TABLE 2. Adverse reactions and health impacts reported to v-safe for persons aged ≥12 years* who received a bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech or
Moderna COVID-19 vaccine booster dose — United States, August 31–October 23, 2022
Event
% Reporting reaction/health impact after vaccination, by age group, yrs
12–17
n = 1,464
18–49
n = 68,592
50–64
n = 59,209
≥65
n = 82,694
Total
N = 211,959
Any injection site reaction 68.7 72.9 62.0 49.7 60.8
Itching 4.6 8.9 7.8 6.9 7.8
Pain 66.9 70.5 58.8 45.0 57.3
Redness 8.5 10.8 9.1 7.6 9.1
Swelling or hardness 13.7 18.4 14.7 9.9 14.0
Any systemic reaction 59.8 67.9 55.2 43.5 54.8
Abdominal pain 6.4 5.5 3.6 2.1 3.6
Myalgia 33.6 41.3 29.0 20.3 29.6
Chills 19.6 20.6 13.7 9.1 14.2
Fatigue 45.2 53.1 40.0 30.0 40.4
Fever 26.3 23.7 16.6 10.2 16.4
Headache 36.3 42.8 31.5 19.7 30.6
Joint pain 14.5 21.7 16.8 11.1 16.1
Nausea 12.4 12.9 7.9 4.5 8.2
Diarrhea 3.0 6.7 5.4 3.8 5.2
Rash 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.1
Vomiting 2.5 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.7
Any health impact 26.8 24.2 17.3 11.6 17.3
Unable to perform normal daily activities 18.4 19.8 14.7 10.6 14.8
Unable to attend school or work 15.6 11.3 6.0 1.6 6.1
Needed medical care 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.8
Telehealth 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3
Clinic 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3
Emergency visit 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Hospitalization 0 0 0 0 0
* On August 31, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration authorized bivalent formulations of Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines for use as a single
booster dose ≥2 months after completing primary or booster vaccination, Pfizer-BioNTech for persons aged ≥12 years and Moderna for adults aged ≥18 years. In
v-safe, a bivalent booster was defined as an age-appropriate mRNA dose administered on or after August 31, 2022, for registrants who completed a primary series
(2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Novavax COVID-19 vaccine or 1 dose of Janssen).
Percentage of registrants who reported a reaction or health impact at least once during days 0–7 postvaccination.
was unrelated to vaccination, 13 completed a VAERS report,
and three did not wish to complete a VAERS report.
Review of VAERS Data
During August 31–October 23, 2022, VAERS received
and processed 5,542 reports of adverse events among per-
sons aged ≥12 years who reported receiving a bivalent booster
dose (Table 3).¶¶¶ The median recipient age was 60 years
(range = 12–101) and 3,559 (64.2%) were female; 939 (16.9%)
reports indicated at least one other vaccine was received at the
same visit as booster vaccination, of which influenza vaccine
was most commonly co-administered (852; 90.7%).
Events related to vaccination errors (e.g., incorrect product
formulation administered, incorrect dose administered, under-
dose, or wrong product administered) were commonly reported
(1,913; 34.5%); among 877 reports of vaccination errors after
receipt of Pfizer-BioNTech and 1,037 reports after receipt of
¶¶¶ Processed VAERS reports are those that have been coded using MedDRA,
deduplicated, and undergone standard quality assurance and quality control review.
Moderna bivalent booster doses, 225 (11.8%) reports indicated
that an adverse health event had occurred.
Most VAERS reports (5,291; 95.5%) were classified as
nonserious, including 2,762 (94.3%) after Pfizer-BioNTech
and 2,530 (96.8%) after Moderna bivalent booster vaccina-
tion. The most commonly reported events among nonserious
reports were headache (628; 11.9%), fatigue (575; 10.9%),
fever (561; 10.6%), pain (524; 9.9%), and chills (459; 8.7%).
Among 251 VAERS reports classified as serious, five were
reports of myocarditis, four were reports of pericarditis, and
20 were reports of COVID-19 disease. The age range of those
who experienced myocarditis or pericarditis was 12–78 years
and 46–78 years, respectively. Thirty-six deaths were reported;
median age of decedents was 71 years (range = 46–98 years).
For the four reports of death with sufficient information for
review at the time of this report, cause of death included cardiac
arrest, dementia, metastatic prostate cancer, and myocardial
infarction. CDC has requested medical and vital records for
the remaining decedents.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
1404 MMWR / November 4, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 44 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
TABLE 3. Events* reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for persons aged ≥12 years after receipt of a bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech
or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine booster dose — United States, August 31–October 23, 2022
Adverse events
Vaccine, no. reporting (%)
Pfizer-BioNTech Moderna Total§
Total 2,928 2,615 5,542
Vaccination errors877 (30.0) 1,037 (39.7) 1,913 (34.5)
Error without adverse health event 717 (81.8) 972 (93.7) 1,688 (88.2)
Error with adverse health event** 160 (18.2) 65 (6.3) 225 (11.8)
Error with nonserious health event†† 157 (17.9) 61 (5.9) 218 (11.4)
Error with serious health event 3 (0.3) 4 (0.4) 7 (0.4)
Nonserious reports§§,¶¶ 2,762 (94.3) 2,530 (96.8) 5,291 (95.5)
Headache 343 (12.4) 285 (11.3) 628 (11.9)
Fatigue 318 (11.5) 257 (10.2) 575 (10.9)
Fever 299 (10.8) 262 (10.4) 561 (10.6)
Pain 293 (10.6) 231 (9.1) 524 (9.9)
Chills 254 (9.2) 205 (8.1) 459 (8.7)
Pain in extremity 209 (7.8) 167 (6.6) 376 (7.1)
Nausea 213 (7.7) 144 (5.7) 357 (6.8)
Dizziness 212 (7.7) 135 (5.3) 347 (6.6)
Injection site pain 138 (5.0) 121 (4.8) 259 (4.9)
COVID-19 169 (6.1) 89 (3.5) 258 (4.9)
Serious reports***,††† 166 (5.7) 85 (3.3) 251 (4.5)
Allergic reaction/Anaphylaxis 6 2 8
Appendicitis 4 1 5
Arrythmia 8 5 13
Atrial fibrillation 5 4 9
Atrioventricular node block, second or third degree 2 0 2
Supraventricular tachycardia 0 1 1
Other 1 0 1
COVID-19 14 6 20
Death§§§ 27 9 36
Dyspnea 4 1 5
Fall 1 6 7
Guillain-Barré syndrome 2 0 2
Hypertension, acute 7 3 10
Pericarditis¶¶¶ 1 3 4
Pneumonia 6 1 7
Seizure 6 0 6
Thrombotic event 20 11 31
Stroke or transient ischemic attack 12 5 17
Pulmonary embolism 5 5 10
Other 3 1 4
Chest pain, not otherwise specified 9 3 12
Myocardial infarction 5 3 8
Myocarditis**** 3 2 5
Abbreviations: MedDRA PT = Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred term; VAERS = Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
* Signs and symptoms in VAERS reports are assigned MedDRA PTs by VAERS staff members. Each VAERS report might be assigned more than one MedDRA PT,
which can include normal diagnostic findings. A MedDRA PT does not indicate a medically confirmed diagnosis.
On August 31, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration authorized bivalent formulations of Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines for use as a single
booster dose ≥2 months after completing primary or booster vaccination, Pfizer-BioNTech for persons aged ≥12 years and Moderna for adults aged ≥18 years.
§ One report was for a person who received both Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent booster doses at the same visit and did not experience an adverse health event.
Vaccine administration or handling errors.
** The most common MedDRA PTs among reports of vaccination error included incorrect product formulation administered, incorrect dose administered, underdose,
and wrong product administered.
†† Adverse health events coded for reports with nonserious vaccination errors included arthralgia, headache, injection site erythema, injection site swelling, fever,
pain, and pain in extremity.
§§ Excluding vaccination error MedDRA PTs.
¶¶ Includes the top 10 most frequently coded MedDRA PTs among nonserious reports.
*** VAERS reports are classified as serious if any of the following are reported: hospitalization, prolongation of hospitalization, life-threatening illness, permanent
disability, congenital anomaly or birth defect, or death. Serious reports to VAERS were reviewed by CDC physicians to form preliminary clinical impressions.
https://www.meddra.org/how-to-use/basics/hierarchy
††† Because of the small number of serious reports, percentages are not provided for serious report events. Other clinical impressions included acute pancreatitis, acute respiratory
failure, aneurysm, arm pain, arthralgia, aseptic meningitis, bilateral pleural effusion, cellulitis, chronic anemia, compression fracture, confusion, contact dermatitis, costochondritis,
erythema nodosum, fever, glaucoma, hearing loss, leukocytoplastic vasculitis, lower extremity weakness, lymphadenopathy, migraine, myalgia, pancreatitis, pericardial and
pleural effusions, pericardial tamponade, pylephlebitis, rhabdomyolysis, unspecified bradycardia, unspecified tachycardia, transverse myelitis, vertigo, and vision loss.
§§§ For reports of death, cause of death was available for four reports: cardiac arrest, dementia, metastatic prostate cancer, and myocardial infarction.
¶¶¶ All four reports of pericarditis have been verified by medical record review.
**** Three of the five reports of myocarditis have been verified by medical record review.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
MMWR / November 4, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 44 1405
US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Summary
What is already known about this topic?
CDC recommended bivalent COVID-19 booster vaccination for
persons aged ≥12 years in August 2022; approximately
22.6 million bivalent booster doses were administered during
August 31–October 23, 2022.
What is added by this report?
Early safety findings from v-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System for bivalent booster doses administered to
persons aged ≥12 years during the first 7 weeks of vaccine
availability are similar to those previously described for
monovalent vaccine booster vaccines.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Adverse events reported after a bivalent booster dose appear
consistent with those reported after a monovalent booster and
are less common and less serious than health impacts associ-
ated with COVID-19 illness.
Discussion
This report provides findings from v-safe and VAERS data
collected during the first 7 weeks of bivalent Pfizer-BioNTech
and Moderna mRNA booster dose administration among
persons aged ≥12 years, when 22.6 million booster doses were
administered in the United States. The findings in this report
are generally consistent with those from safety data from
preauthorization clinical trials of a BA.1 Omicron bivalent
booster vaccination.****,††††
Reporting frequencies of reactions and health impacts among
the 211,959 v-safe registrants aged ≥12 years who received
an age-appropriate bivalent booster vaccination are similar to
those described after receipt of first and second booster vac-
cine doses among adults aged ≥50 years (35). Among adults
aged ≥18 years, reporting frequencies of local and systemic
reactions after bivalent booster vaccination decreased with
increasing age. This reporting pattern was also observed for
primary series COVID-19 vaccination; v-safe registrants aged
≥65 years reported reactions less frequently after primary series
doses than did younger adults (6).
Most reports to VAERS for persons aged ≥12 years after
a bivalent booster dose were nonserious (95.5%) and were
usually similar to those after first booster vaccination and sec-
ond booster vaccination among adults aged ≥50 years (35).
Vaccination errors were among the most common events
reported to VAERS (34.5%); most (88.2%) of which did not
list an adverse health event. Continued education of vaccine
providers could help reduce administration errors.
**** https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2022-09-
01/07-COVID-Swanson-508.pdf
†††† https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2022-09-
01/06-covid-miller-508.pdf
Myocarditis and pericarditis are rare adverse events associ-
ated with receipt of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (2). To date,
five reports of myocarditis and four reports of pericarditis after
bivalent booster vaccination were received by VAERS follow-
ing administration of 22.6 million doses among persons aged
≥12 years in the United States. Reporting rates of myocarditis
following COVID-19 mRNA primary series and monovalent
booster vaccination were highest among adolescent and young
adult males; myocarditis rates after monovalent booster dose
in these early data are similar to or lower than those after
primary series doses (2,7). In one study, an increased risk of
pericarditis was detected in the first week after the second dose
of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines among males aged 12–50 years
and females aged 30–50 years (8).
Among nonserious reports to VAERS were 258 (4.9%)
reports of COVID-19 disease; there were 20 (8.0%) serious
reports of COVID-19 disease. Vaccine effectiveness studies
have shown that among persons who were diagnosed with
COVID-19, previous vaccination with mRNA-based vac-
cines reduced COVID-19 disease severity, including the risk
of hospitalization and death (9,10).
The findings in this report are subject to at least three limita-
tions. First, v-safe is a voluntary program; therefore, data might
not be representative of the vaccinated population. Second, as
a passive surveillance system, VAERS is subject to reporting
biases and underreporting, especially of nonserious events (1).
Finally, conclusions drawn from these data are limited by the
7-week surveillance period; safety monitoring will continue
during the bivalent booster vaccination program.
As of October 12, 2022, ACIP recommends that all persons
aged ≥5 years receive an age-appropriate bivalent mRNA
booster dose ≥2 months after completion of a COVID-19
primary series or receipt of a monovalent booster dose (3).
Preliminary safety findings after bivalent booster vaccination
among persons aged ≥12 years are similar to those after mon-
ovalent booster vaccination (35). Health care providers and
patients can be reassured that adverse events reported after a
bivalent booster dose are consistent with those reported after
monovalent doses. Health impacts after COVID-19 vaccina-
tion are less frequent and less severe than those associated with
COVID-19 illness. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor
vaccine safety and will provide updates as needed to help guide
COVID-19 vaccination recommendations.
Acknowledgments
Charles Licata, Isaac McCullum, David Yankey.
Corresponding author: Anne M. Hause, voe5@cdc.gov.
1CDC COVID-19 Emergency Response Team; 2Food and Drug Administration,
Silver Spring, Maryland.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
1406 MMWR / November 4, 2022 / Vol. 71 / No. 44 US Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
All authors have completed and submitted the International
Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential
conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
References
1. Shimabukuro TT, Nguyen M, Martin D, DeStefano F. Safety monitoring
in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Vaccine
2015;33:4398–405. PMID:26209838 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
vaccine.2015.07.035
2. Block JP, Boehmer TK, Forrest CB, et al. Cardiac complications after
SARS-CoV-2 infection and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination—
PCORnet, United States, January 2021–January 2022. MMWR Morb
Mortal Wkly Rep; 2022;71:517–23. PMID:35389977 https://doi.
org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7114e1
3. Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, et al. Safety monitoring of COVID-19
vaccine booster doses among adults—United States, September 22,
2021–February 6, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:249–
54. PMID:35176008 https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e1
4. Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, et al. Safety monitoring of COVID-19
vaccine booster doses among persons aged 12–17 years—United States,
December 9, 2021–February 20, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly
Rep 2022;71:347–51. PMID:35239637 https://doi.org/10.15585/
mmwr.mm7109e2
5. Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, et al. Safety monitoring of COVID-19
mRNA vaccine second booster doses among adults aged ≥50 years—
United States, March 29, 2022–July 10, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal
Wkly Rep 2022;71:971–6. PMID:35900925 https://doi.org/10.15585/
mmwr.mm7130a4
6. Rosenblum HG, Gee J, Liu R, et al. Safety of mRNA vaccines
administered during the initial 6 months of the US COVID-19
vaccination programme: an observational study of reports to the Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System and v-safe. Lancet Infect Dis
2022;22:802–12. PMID:35271805 https://doi.org/10.1016/
S1473-3099(22)00054-8
7. Shimabukuro TT. COVID-19 vaccine safety update: primary series in
young children and booster doses in older children and adults. Presented
at the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting, Atlanta,
GA; September 1, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/
downloads/slides-2022-09-01/05-covid-shimabukuro-508.pdf
8. Le Vu S, Bertrand M, Jabagi MJ, et al. Age and sex-specific risks of
myocarditis and pericarditis following Covid-19 messenger RNA
vaccines. Nat Commun 2022;13:3633. PMID:35752614 https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41467-022-31401-5
9. Tenforde MW, Self WH, Adams K, et al. Association between mRNA
vaccination and COVID-19 hospitalization and disease severity. JAMA
2021;326:2043–54. PMID:34734975 https://doi.org/10.1001/
jama.2021.19499
10. Link-Gelles R, Levy ME, Natarajan K, et al. Association between
COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and COVID-19 illness and severity during
Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 sublineage periods. medRxiv [Preprint posted
online October 5, 2022]. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.04.22280459
... A woman in her 70s vaccinated with Pfizer BA.1 and a man in his 20s vaccinated with Moderna BA.4/5 had a causal relationship, and the causality for the remaining cases was either not established or was under investigation [17]. In addition, no specific symptoms were identified beyond the previously known AEs, and there was no significant difference in the incidence rate [18,19]. Analyzing the relationship between vaccines and deaths requires considerable time and effort; therefore, a comparative analysis with existing death statistics should be conducted before interpreting these findings. ...
... Analyzing the relationship between vaccines and deaths requires considerable time and effort; therefore, a comparative analysis with existing death statistics should be conducted before interpreting these findings. The results of the TMS were consistent with those previously reported from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine clinical trials [18][19][20][21][22]. Most cases were mild or moderate and temporary, with pain at the injection site being the most common local AE. ...
... Fatigue and myalgia were the most commonly reported systemic AEs, and no serious events were documented. According to both the TMS in Korea and V-Safe data from the United States, most events affecting daily life occurred on the day following vaccination (Figure 2) [18,19,22,23]. According to the Australian Active Surveillance data, the most frequently reported local AEs after vaccination with both Pfizer and Moderna BA.1 and BA.4/5 were pain at the injection site. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives The aim of this study was to disseminate information about the safety of bivalent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA booster vaccines administered to adults in the Republic of Korea. Methods Two databases were used to assess the safety of COVID-19 booster doses of Pfizer BA.1, Pfizer BA.4/5, Moderna BA.1, and Moderna BA.4/5 vaccines for adults aged 18 years and older. Adverse events (AEs) were analyzed using data reported to the web-based COVID-19 vaccination management system (CVMS) and a self-reported text-message survey. Results Between October 11, 2022 and March 30, 2023, the CVMS received reports of 2,369 (93.7%) non-serious AEs from vaccinated adults, along with 158 (6.3%) serious AEs, which included 5 cases of anaphylaxis and 33 deaths. From October 11, 2022 to January 27, 2023, 40,022 people aged 18 and older responded to a survey conducted via text message. The booster doses were associated with fewer local and systemic AEs compared to the original vaccines. After receiving the bivalent vaccine, the most commonly reported AEs were pain at the injection site, headache, fatigue, and myalgia. Conclusion Overall, bivalent vaccines exhibited fewer AEs compared to the original vaccines. The majority of AEs were non-serious, and serious AEs were rare among adults aged 18 years and older following vaccination with the Pfizer and Moderna bivalent vaccines.
... Vaccination against COVID-19 is an effective and safe strategy to reduce the likelihood of negative health impacts due to contracting COVID-19. [2][3][4] Additionally, certain disability types were associated with increased mortality and an increased risk of hospitalization with COVID-19. 5,6 An October 2021 study found that adults with disabilities had a lower likelihood of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, despite being less likely to report hesitancy, suggesting that there are barriers to accessing the vaccine. ...
Article
Over a quarter of adults in the United States live with a disability, increasing their risk for severe outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Additionally, people with disabilities face continuous barriers in accessing COVID-19 vaccinations. Disability-led organizations are catalytic partners for public health departments to reach and provide services to and build partnerships with people with disabilities. For this reason, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation funded three disability-led organizations, two nationally focused and one locally focused, to partner with state and local public health agencies to identify and address barriers to COVID-19 vaccination and emergency response planning in their communities. These partners identified key strategies for inclusion in emergency response and vaccination planning, including creating accessible materials and messaging, ensuring the accessibility of vaccination sites, and addressing the historical mistrust between people with disabilities and health systems. Through this funding, 59 partnerships between disability-led organizations and disability or public health partners were formed with 26 memorandums of understanding being executed. This project provides actionable recommendations and illustrates that disability-led organizations are key public health partners in planning for and implementing strategies that benefit people with disabilities and the community more broadly.
... The safety monitoring of the bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, for instance, has shown that most reports were nonserious and usually similar to those after first and second booster vaccinations. However, myocarditis and pericarditis, though rare, have been associated with mRNA vaccines (68). In conclusion, while the initial results from animal models are promising, the long-term safety of mRNA vaccines must be rigorously evaluated through extended follow-up studies and surveillance. ...
Article
Full-text available
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp), a unique pathogen devoid of a cell wall, is naturally impervious to penicillin antibiotics. This bacterium is the causative agent of M. pneumoniae pneumonia, an acute pulmonary affliction marked by interstitial lung damage. Non-macrolide medications may have potential adverse effects on the developmental trajectory of children, thereby establishing macrolides as the preferred treatment for M. pneumoniae in pediatric patients. However, the emergence of macrolide-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains of M. pneumoniae presents significant challenges to clinical management and public health. Vaccines, particularly those based on mRNA technology, are regarded as a promising avenue for preventing and controlling M. pneumoniae infections due to their inherent safety, immunogenicity, and adaptability. Our research delves into the P1 adhesin of M. pneumoniae, a protein that binds to host cell receptors with its immunodominant epitopes located at the carboxyl terminus, known to provoke robust immune responses and pulmonary inflammation. We have developed an mRNA vaccine harnessing this dominant antigenic epitope and assessed its protective immunity in BALB/c mice against M. pneumoniae infection. The vaccine elicited potent humoral and cellular immune responses, effectively diminishing inflammation. It notably decreased IL-6 levels in the lungs of infected mice and concurrently elevated IL-4, IL-10, and IFN-γ levels post-immunization. The vaccine also reduced pathological changes in the lungs and the M. pneumoniae DNA copy numbers in the infected animals. Collectively, these findings underscore the mRNA vaccine’s remarkable immunogenicity and protective potential against M. pneumoniae infections, offering valuable insights for the development of mRNA vaccines targeting mycoplasma infections. IMPORTANCE M. pneumoniae, a bacteria without a cell wall, is known for causing pneumonia and is resistant to penicillin. The increasing prevalence of macrolide-resistant strains has complicated treatment options, emphasizing the need for new strategies. Our research explores an mRNA vaccine candidate that targets the P1 adhesin of M. pneumoniae, a protein critical for the bacteria’s interaction with host cells. In a mouse model, this vaccine has shown potential by inducing immune responses and suggesting a possible reduction in inflammation, as indicated by changes in cytokine levels and lung pathology. While further research is required, the vaccine’s preliminary results hint at a potential new direction in managing mycoplasma infections, offering a promising avenue for future therapeutic development. This study contributes to the ongoing search for effective preventive measures against M. pneumoniae.
... Studies on the efficacy and effectiveness of vaccines have been conducted to determine public health policy strategies for effective control of COVID-19 over time up to 2022 (4). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) (2023), out of 550 million doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administered, only about 0.0042% of serious adverse events were reported (5,6). Long-term monitoring by VAERS has shown a lower frequency of reports of serious side effects related to mRNA vaccines (7). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background There are few studies in the literature evaluating post-COVID mortality in Brazil, along medium and long term, especially in those who presented severe clinical disease. Objective This study aims to investigate the factors associated with post-COVID mortality of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) cases from 2020 to 2023 in Brazil, along medium and long term. Methods Retrospective cohort study using notification data of SARS classified as COVID-19 from the Brazilian National Information System, “Sistema de Vigilância Epidemiológica (SIVEP),” during the period 2020 to 2023. Data included demographics, comorbidities, vaccination status, number of COVID-19 vaccine doses, city of residence, and survival outcomes. Classic Cox, Cox mixed effects, and Cox fragility models were used to assess medium and long-term risks of dying post-COVID. Results In the medium and long-term periods studied, 5,157 deaths were recorded out of 15,147 reported SARS/COVID-19 cases. Of these deaths, 91.5% (N = 4,720) occurred within the first year, while 8,5% (N = 437) after the first year. People without formal education, the older adult, had higher percentages of deaths in both periods. In the medium-term post-COVID period, the risk of death was reduced by 8% for those who had been vaccinated while in the long-term post-COVID period, the risk of death almost doubled for those who had been vaccinated. While in the medium term, there was a reduction in mortality risk for those who took two or three doses, in the long term the risk of death was greater for those who took one or two doses. Conclusion The protective effect of COVID-19 immunization was observed up to one year after the first symptoms. After one year, the effect was reversed, showing an increased risk of death for those vaccinated. These results highlight the need for further research to elucidate the factors that contribute to these findings.
Article
Purpose Active monitoring of health outcomes after COVID‐19 vaccination provides early detection of rare outcomes post‐licensure. We evaluated health outcomes following bivalent COVID‐19 Pfizer‐BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA‐1273.222) vaccination in the United States. Methods Multiple health outcomes were monitored monthly from August 2022 to July 2023 in four administrative claims databases (CVS Health, Carelon Research, Optum, and Medicare). The study included individuals 6 months and older who received a bivalent COVID‐19 BNT162b2 or mRNA‐1273.222 vaccination during the study period and met a minimum continuous enrollment requirement in a medical insurance plan prior to COVID‐19 vaccination. Descriptive analyses monitored counts of vaccinations, outcomes, and concomitant COVID‐19 and influenza vaccination. Maximized Sequential Probability Ratio Testing (MaxSPRT) tested for elevations in the observed incidence rate of outcomes post‐vaccination compared to annual historical rates estimated from 2019 or 2020, adjusted for claims delay in the observed rate. Where case counts permitted, historical rates were standardized by age and/or sex for all persons, and race and/or nursing home residency status for Medicare persons only. Results Overall, 13.9 million individuals 6 months and older received a bivalent COVID‐19 vaccine. A statistical signal occurred for two outcomes in one database (significance level of 1%): anaphylaxis following both bivalent COVID‐19 vaccines in persons 18–64 years and myocarditis/pericarditis following bivalent BNT162b2 vaccines in individuals 18–35 years. Among 642 142 vaccinated children 6 months–17 years, no signals were identified. Conclusions Results were consistent with published COVID‐19 vaccine safety studies and support the safety profile of bivalent COVID‐19 mRNA vaccines.
Article
Full-text available
Background To provide a detailed understanding and apply a comprehensive strategy, this study examines the association between COVID-19 vaccination and cardiovascular events. We conducted a Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis using summary data across multiple outcomes including myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmia, and CAD, considering potential dependencies in the data. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods were detected for easy implementation of the Bayesian approach. Also, the sensitivity analysis of the model was done by using different priors. Methods Fifteen studies were included in the systematic review, with eleven studies comparing the results between the vaccine group and the unvaccinated group. Additionally, six studies were used for further analysis to compare mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna). Results Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a link between vaccines and CAD risk (OR, 1.70; 95% CrI: 1.11–2.57), particularly after BNT162b2 (OR, 1.64; 95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) and second dose (OR, 3.44; 95% CrI: 1.99–5.98). No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine. Conclusions Secondary analysis showed no notable disparity in cardiovascular outcomes between BNT162b2 and mRNA vaccines. The association of COVID-19 vaccination with the risk of coronary artery disease should be considered in future vaccine technologies for the next pandemic.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background To mitigate the spread of variants such as Omicron in COVID-19 pandemic, the development and utilization of COVID-19 bivalent vaccines have become essential. However, an expected subset of individuals may experience serious adverse events (AE) after receiving the COVID-19 bivalent vaccine. Methods In this research, we conducted an in-depth analysis of data obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 bivalent vaccines administered between 9/15/2022 and 9/1/2023. The Standard Federal Regions were used for region partitions. To broaden our understanding of post-vaccination AE, we performed temporal analysis to investigate the trends of Top 10 reported AE in all serious adverse event reports. We also examined the similarity of AE across diverse regions within the United States. Results Our findings indicated that a relatively stably decreasing trend was observed over time, with four peaks in December 2022, February 2023, Mar 2023 and April 2023. In terms of spatial analysis, the middle and northern regions exhibited higher rates of reported AEs associated with COVID-19 bivalent vaccine. An obvious similar pattern of AE is observed across regions (III, IV, V, VI, VII). Conclusion Overall, our research underscores the ongoing need for vigilant post-licensure vaccine monitoring, emphasizing the continuous surveillance and analysis essential for upholding the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 bivalent vaccines.
Preprint
Full-text available
Importance: Recent sublineages of the SARS–CoV–2 Omicron variant, including BA.4 and BA.5, may be associated with greater immune evasion and less protection against COVID–19 following vaccination. Objective: To evaluate the association between COVID–19 mRNA vaccination with 2, 3, or 4 doses among immunocompetent adults and the risk of medically attended COVID–19 illness during a period of BA.4/BA.5 predominant circulation; to evaluate the relative severity of COVID–19 in hospitalized cases across Omicron BA.1, BA.2/BA.2.12.1, and BA.4/BA.5 sublineage periods. Setting, Design and Participants: Test-negative study of adults with COVID–19–like illness (CLI) and molecular testing for SARS–CoV–2 conducted in 10 states from December 16, 2021, to August 20, 2022. Exposure: mRNA COVID–19 vaccination. Main Outcomes and Measures: Emergency department/urgent care encounters, hospitalizations, and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or in-hospital death. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for the association between prior vaccination and medically attended COVID-19 was used to estimate VE, stratified by care setting and vaccine doses (2, 3, or 4 doses vs 0 doses as reference group). Among hospitalized case-patients, demographic and clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes including ICU admission and death were compared across sublineage periods. Results: Between June 19 – August 20, 2022, 82,229 ED/UC and 21,007 hospital encounters were included for the BA.4/BA.5 vaccine effectiveness analysis. Among adults hospitalized with CLI, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.83) for receipt of 2 vaccine doses at ≥150 days after receipt, 0.32 (95% CI: 0.20–0.50) for a third dose 7–119 days after receipt, and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.58–0.71) for a third dose ≥120 days (median 235 days) after receipt for cases vs controls. For COVID-19-associated hospitalization, among patients ages ≥65 years 7-59 and ≥60 days (median 88 days) after a fourth dose, ORs were 0.34 (95% CI: 0.25–0.47) and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.34–0.56), respectively. Among hospitalized cases, ICU admission and/or in-hospital death occurred in 21.4% during the BA.1 vs 14.7% during the BA.4/BA.5 period (standardized mean difference: 0.17). Conclusion: VE against medically attended COVID-19 illness decreased over time since last dose; receipt of one or two booster doses increased effectiveness over a primary series alone.
Article
Full-text available
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that all persons aged ≥5 years receive 1 booster dose of a COVID-19 vaccine after completion of their primary series.* On March 29, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized a second mRNA booster dose ≥4 months after receipt of a first booster dose for adults aged ≥50 years and persons aged ≥12 years with moderate to severe immunocompromise (1,2). To characterize the safety of a second mRNA booster dose among persons aged ≥50 years, CDC reviewed adverse events and health impact assessments reported to v-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) after receipt of a second mRNA booster dose during March 29-July 10, 2022. V-safe is a voluntary smartphone-based U.S. active surveillance system that monitors adverse events occurring after COVID-19 vaccination. VAERS is a U.S. passive surveillance system for monitoring adverse events after vaccination, managed by CDC and FDA (3). During March 29-July 10, 2022, approximately 16.8 million persons in the United States aged ≥50 years received a fourth dose.† Among 286,380 v-safe registrants aged ≥50 years who reported receiving a second booster of an mRNA vaccine, 86.9% received vaccines from the same manufacturer for all 4 doses (i.e., homologous vaccination). Among registrants who reported homologous vaccination, injection site and systemic reactions were less frequent after the second booster dose than after the first booster dose. VAERS received 8,515 reports of adverse events after second mRNA booster doses among adults aged ≥50 years, including 8,073 (94.8%) nonserious and 442 (5.1%) serious events. CDC recommends that health care providers and patients be advised that local and systemic reactions are expected after a second booster dose, and that serious adverse events are uncommon.
Article
Full-text available
Cases of myocarditis and pericarditis have been reported following the receipt of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. As vaccination campaigns are still to be extended, we aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the association, by vaccine and across sex and age groups. Using nationwide hospital discharge and vaccine data, we analysed all 1612 cases of myocarditis and 1613 cases of pericarditis that occurred in France in the period from May 12, 2021 to October 31, 2021. We perform matched case-control studies and find increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis during the first week following vaccination, and particularly after the second dose, with adjusted odds ratios of myocarditis of 8.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7 to 9.9) for the BNT162b2 and 30 (95% CI, 21 to 43) for the mRNA-1273 vaccine. The largest associations are observed for myocarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination in persons aged 18 to 24 years. Estimates of excess cases attributable to vaccination also reveal a substantial burden of both myocarditis and pericarditis across other age groups and in both males and females.
Article
Full-text available
As of February 20, 2022, only BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine has been authorized for use in persons aged 12-17 years in the United States (1). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amended the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on December 9, 2021, to authorize a homologous* booster dose for persons aged 16-17 years ≥6 months after receipt of dose 2 (1). On January 3, 2022, authorization was expanded to include persons aged 12-15 years, and for all persons aged ≥12 years, the interval between dose 2 and booster dose was shortened to ≥5 months (1). To characterize the safety of Pfizer-BioNTech booster doses among persons aged 12-17 years (adolescents), CDC reviewed adverse events and health impact assessments during the week after receipt of a homologous Pfizer-BioNTech booster dose reported to v-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based safety surveillance system for adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination, and adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive vaccine safety surveillance system managed by CDC and FDA. During December 9, 2021-February 20, 2022, approximately 2.8 million U.S. adolescents received a Pfizer-BioNTech booster dose.† During this period, receipt of 3,418 Pfizer-BioNTech booster doses were reported to v-safe for adolescents. Reactions were reported to v-safe with equal or slightly higher frequency after receipt of a booster dose than after dose 2, were primarily mild to moderate in severity, and were most frequently reported the day after vaccination. VAERS received 914 reports of adverse events after Pfizer-BioNTech booster dose vaccination of adolescents; 837 (91.6%) were nonserious and 77 (8.4%) were serious. Health care providers, parents, and adolescents should be advised that local and systemic reactions are expected among adolescents after homologous Pfizer-BioNTech booster vaccination, and that serious adverse events are rare.
Article
Full-text available
During September 22, 2021-February 6, 2022, approximately 82.6 million U.S. residents aged ≥18 years received a COVID-19 vaccine booster dose.* The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized a booster dose of either the same product administered for the primary series (homologous) or a booster dose that differs from the product administered for the primary series (heterologous). These booster authorizations apply to all three COVID-19 vaccines used in the United States (1-3).† The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended preferential use of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273 [Moderna] or BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech]) for a booster, even for persons who received the Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen [Johnson & Johnson]) COVID-19 vaccine for their single-dose primary series.§ To characterize the safety of COVID-19 vaccine boosters among persons aged ≥18 years during September 22, 2021-February 6, 2022, CDC reviewed adverse events and health impact assessments following receipt of a booster that were reported to v-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based safety surveillance system for adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination, and adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive vaccine safety surveillance system managed by CDC and FDA. Among 721,562 v-safe registrants aged ≥18 years who reported receiving a booster, 88.8% received homologous COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Among registrants who reported a homologous COVID-19 mRNA booster dose, systemic reactions were less frequent following the booster (58.4% [Pfizer-BioNTech] and 64.4% [Moderna], respectively) than were those following dose 2 (66.7% and 78.4%, respectively). The adjusted odds of reporting a systemic reaction were higher following a Moderna COVID-19 vaccine booster, irrespective of the vaccine received for the primary series. VAERS has received 39,286 reports of adverse events after a COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination for adults aged ≥18 years, including 36,282 (92.4%) nonserious and 3,004 (7.6%) serious events. Vaccination providers should educate patients that local and systemic reactions are expected following a homologous COVID-19 mRNA vaccine booster; however, these reactions appear less common than those following dose 2 of an mRNA-based vaccine. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor vaccine safety and provide data to guide vaccine recommendations and protect public health.
Article
Cardiac complications, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis, have been associated with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection (1-3) and mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (2-5). Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS) is a rare but serious complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection with frequent cardiac involvement (6). Using electronic health record (EHR) data from 40 U.S. health care systems during January 1, 2021-January 31, 2022, investigators calculated incidences of cardiac outcomes (myocarditis; myocarditis or pericarditis; and myocarditis, pericarditis, or MIS) among persons aged ≥5 years who had SARS-CoV-2 infection, stratified by sex (male or female) and age group (5-11, 12-17, 18-29, and ≥30 years). Incidences of myocarditis and myocarditis or pericarditis were calculated after first, second, unspecified, or any (first, second, or unspecified) dose of mRNA COVID-19 (BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] or mRNA-1273 [Moderna]) vaccines, stratified by sex and age group. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated to compare risk for cardiac outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection to that after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. The incidence of cardiac outcomes after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was highest for males aged 12-17 years after the second vaccine dose; however, within this demographic group, the risk for cardiac outcomes was 1.8-5.6 times as high after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after the second vaccine dose. The risk for cardiac outcomes was likewise significantly higher after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after first, second, or unspecified dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination for all other groups by sex and age (RR 2.2-115.2). These findings support continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons aged ≥5 years.
Article
Background In December, 2020, two mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines were authorised for use in the USA. We aimed to describe US surveillance data collected through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive system, and v-safe, a new active system, during the first 6 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination programme. Methods In this observational study, we analysed data reported to VAERS and v-safe during Dec 14, 2020, to June 14, 2021. VAERS reports were categorised as non-serious, serious, or death. Reporting rates were calculated using numbers of COVID-19 doses administered as the denominator. We analysed v-safe survey reports from days 0–7 after vaccination for reactogenicity, severity (mild, moderate, or severe), and health impacts (ie, unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, or received care from a medical professional). Findings During the study period, 298 792 852 doses of mRNA vaccines were administered in the USA. VAERS processed 340 522 reports: 313 499 (92·1%) were non-serious, 22 527 (6·6%) were serious (non-death), and 4496 (1·3%) were deaths. Over half of 7 914 583 v-safe participants self-reported local and systemic reactogenicity, more frequently after dose two (4 068 447 [71·7%] of 5 674 420 participants for local reactogenicity and 4 018 920 [70·8%] for systemic) than after dose one (4 644 989 [68·6%] of 6 775 515 participants for local reactogenicity and 3 573 429 [52·7%] for systemic). Injection-site pain (4 488 402 [66·2%] of 6 775 515 participants after dose one and 3 890 848 [68·6%] of 5 674 420 participants after dose two), fatigue (2 295 205 [33·9%] participants after dose one and 3 158 299 participants [55·7%] after dose two), and headache (1 831 471 [27·0%] participants after dose one and 2 623 721 [46·2%] participants after dose two) were commonly reported during days 0–7 following vaccination. Reactogenicity was reported most frequently the day after vaccination; most reactions were mild. More reports of being unable to work, do normal activities, or of seeking medical care occurred after dose two (1 821 421 [32·1%]) than after dose one (808 963 [11·9%]); less than 1% of participants reported seeking medical care after vaccination (56 647 [0·8%] after dose one and 53 077 [0·9%] after dose two). Interpretation Safety data from more than 298 million doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered in the first 6 months of the US vaccination programme show that most reported adverse events were mild and short in duration. Funding US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Article
Importance: A comprehensive understanding of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination requires consideration of disease attenuation, determined as whether people who develop COVID-19 despite vaccination have lower disease severity than unvaccinated people. Objective: To evaluate the association between vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines-mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech)-and COVID-19 hospitalization, and, among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, the association with progression to critical disease. Design, setting, and participants: A US 21-site case-control analysis of 4513 adults hospitalized between March 11 and August 15, 2021, with 28-day outcome data on death and mechanical ventilation available for patients enrolled through July 14, 2021. Date of final follow-up was August 8, 2021. Exposures: COVID-19 vaccination. Main outcomes and measures: Associations were evaluated between prior vaccination and (1) hospitalization for COVID-19, in which case patients were those hospitalized for COVID-19 and control patients were those hospitalized for an alternative diagnosis; and (2) disease progression among patients hospitalized for COVID-19, in which cases and controls were COVID-19 patients with and without progression to death or mechanical ventilation, respectively. Associations were measured with multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 4513 patients (median age, 59 years [IQR, 45-69]; 2202 [48.8%] women; 23.0% non-Hispanic Black individuals, 15.9% Hispanic individuals, and 20.1% with an immunocompromising condition), 1983 were case patients with COVID-19 and 2530 were controls without COVID-19. Unvaccinated patients accounted for 84.2% (1669/1983) of COVID-19 hospitalizations. Hospitalization for COVID-19 was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of vaccination (cases, 15.8%; controls, 54.8%; adjusted OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.13-0.18), including for sequenced SARS-CoV-2 Alpha (8.7% vs 51.7%; aOR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06-0.16) and Delta variants (21.9% vs 61.8%; aOR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.10-0.21). This association was stronger for immunocompetent patients (11.2% vs 53.5%; aOR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.09-0.13) than immunocompromised patients (40.1% vs 58.8%; aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.69) (P < .001) and weaker at more than 120 days since vaccination with BNT162b2 (5.8% vs 11.5%; aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27-0.49) than with mRNA-1273 (1.9% vs 8.3%; aOR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09-0.23) (P < .001). Among 1197 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, death or invasive mechanical ventilation by day 28 was associated with decreased likelihood of vaccination (12.0% vs 24.7%; aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.58). Conclusions and relevance: Vaccination with an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was significantly less likely among patients with COVID-19 hospitalization and disease progression to death or mechanical ventilation. These findings are consistent with risk reduction among vaccine breakthrough infections compared with absence of vaccination.
Article
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conduct post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous (or passive) reporting system. This means that after a vaccine is approved, CDC and FDA continue to monitor safety while it is distributed in the marketplace for use by collecting and analyzing spontaneous reports of adverse events that occur in persons following vaccination. Various methods and statistical techniques are used to analyze VAERS data, which CDC and FDA use to guide further safety evaluations and inform decisions around vaccine recommendations and regulatory action. VAERS data must be interpreted with caution due to the inherent limitations of passive surveillance. VAERS is primarily a safety signal detection and hypothesis generating system. Generally, VAERS data cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused an adverse event. VAERS data interpreted alone or out of context can lead to erroneous conclusions about cause and effect as well as the risk of adverse events occurring following vaccination. CDC makes VAERS data available to the public and readily accessible online. We describe fundamental vaccine safety concepts, provide an overview of VAERS for healthcare professionals who provide vaccinations and might want to report or better understand a vaccine adverse event, and explain how CDC and FDA analyze VAERS data. We also describe strengths and limitations, and address common misconceptions about VAERS. Information in this review will be helpful for healthcare professionals counseling patients, parents, and others on vaccine safety and benefit-risk balance of vaccination. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
COVID-19 vaccine safety update: primary series in young children and booster doses in older children and adults. Presented at the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting
  • T T Shimabukuro
Shimabukuro TT. COVID-19 vaccine safety update: primary series in young children and booster doses in older children and adults. Presented at the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting, Atlanta, GA; September 1, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/ downloads/slides-2022-09-01/05-covid-shimabukuro-508.pdf