Article

Dynamics of Transformation of Right to Education in India from Directive Principle to Fundamental Right: A History of Denial

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

The demand for free and compulsory education in India began more than a century ago. The narration of free and compulsory education during British rule in India was a chequered history of unfulfilled vision. India attained its independence from British rule in 1947. On 26 January 1950 when the Constitution of India came into operation, the constitutional directive for free and compulsory education was under the directive principles as a ‘non-justiciable’ right through Article 45 promising to fulfil within a period of ten years from its commencement. But the state failed to do so for the next 5 decades. Ultimately, the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (Right to Education Act), 2009, came into effect on 1 April 2010, pursuant to the 86th Amendment to the Constitution of India (2002), which mandates elementary education as a fundamental right. India took more than a half-century in evolving free and compulsory education from the directive principle to fundamental right, from ‘justiciable right’ to ‘non-justiciable right’. However, this article intends to analyse the dynamics of transformation of the right to free and compulsory education in India from directive principle to fundamental right in light of the history of persistent denial in the post-Constitutional era. The article also explores what actually happened at the time of framing the Indian Constitution that the right to education was finally shifted from a ‘justiciable right’ to ‘non-justiciable right’ in the final text of the Constitution of India.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the RTE Act, 2009) came into effect since 1st April 2010, pursuant to the 86th Amendment to the Constitution of India (2002), which promises elementary education as a fundamental right. It makes legally binding on the State to ensure free and compulsory education to all children of the age of 6–14 years all over India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The 1st April 2020 marked the decadal anniversary of the RTE Act. The present study aims to examine the achievements and gaps in the implementation of the Act after a decade, with the objectives of gaining insights into the major hindrances towards its successful implementation, with a future roadmap based upon the recurring challenges.
Article
Full-text available
Attempts to make free and compulsory education accessible to Indian children began a little more than a century ago. A strong consciousness for the need of free and compulsory Primary Education in India was highly moved by enactment of the Compulsory Education Act in 1870 in England. Education has been formally recognized as a human right since the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948. This has since then been reaffirmed in numerous global human rights treaties. Ultimately, universalization of elementary education has been one of the most important goals of educational development in India since independence. The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (RTE Act), 2009, came into force from April 1, 2010, pursuant to the Eighty-Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of India (2002), which guarantees elementary education as a fundamental right. This article attempts to delve into the checkered history of development of the free and compulsory primary education in India under the British Raj. The history of compulsory and free primary education during the British Rule in India is an uphill journey replete with suggestions, advocacies, demands, experimentations, attempts, promises, and movements within legislative framework. The British rulers adopted a good number of policies on education, but these were framed in tune with the needs of the colonial power. Consequently, compulsory and free primary education remained an unfulfilled dream during the British Raj, in spite of the stirring efforts of the Indians.
Article
The original constitutional provision for free and compulsory education, granted under Article 45 stated that it was to be available for ‘all children until they complete the age of fourteen years’, but it did not specify the lower age limit nor the stage of education (whether elementary or primary) that would be free and compulsory. This has led to much speculation about the ‘real intentions’ of the founding fathers of the Constitution and even led to ‘policy framing’ in support of various preferred strategies. However, this article, based on recent research that traces the genesis of this clause, shows that the pre-final text of what was adopted in the Constitution of India as Article 45 originated from four sister clauses that together represented the essence of the Sargent Plan of 1944, with the intention of making only the primary stage of education free and compulsory.
National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA)
  • N Juneja
Correcting a historical injustice
  • N Juneja
Fundamental Right Status for education opportunity or eyewash
  • A S Seetharamu
National Portal of India
  • India Government Of