Chapter

The Proper Objective Telos of Deontological Teleology: Making Persons as Such One’s End

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This book defends the idea that Kant’s virtue theory is best understood as a system of eudaemonism, indeed, as a distinctive form of eudaemonism that makes it preferable to other forms of it: a system of what this book calls Deontological Eudaemonism. In Deontological Eudaemonism, one achieves happiness both rationally conceived (as non-felt pleasure in the virtually unimpeded harmonious activity of one’s will and choice) and empirically conceived (as pleasurable fulfillment of one’s desires) only via authentic commitment to and fulfillment of what is demanded of all rational beings: making persons as such one’s end in all things. To tell this story of Deontological Eudaemonism, this book first, in Part I, defends the notion that Kant’s deontological approach to ethics is simultaneously (and, indeed, foundationally and most basically) teleological. Then, in Part II, it shows that the realization of an aptitude for the virtuous fulfillment of one’s obligatory ends provides the solid basis for simultaneous realization of happiness, both rationally and empirically conceived. Along the way, the book argues both that Kant’s notion of happiness rationally conceived is essentially identical to Aristotle’s conception of happiness as unimpeded activity, and that his notion of happiness empirically conceived is best realized via an unwavering commitment to the fulfillment of one’s obligatory ends.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.