ArticlePDF Available

Challenges Affecting Youth Participation in Governance: A Case of Tharaka-Nithi County

Authors:
Journal of
Public Policy and Administration
2022; 6(2): 100-104
http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/jppa
doi:
10.11648/j.jppa.20220602.16
ISSN: 2640-2688 (Print); ISSN: 2640-2696 (Online)
Challenges Affecting Youth Participation in Governance:
A Case of Tharaka-Nithi County, Kenya
Lumadede Japheth, Vengi Ambrose, Nzioka John
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Tharaka University College, Marimanti,
Kenya
Email address:
To cite this article:
Lumadede Japheth, Vengi Ambrose, Nzioka John. Challenges Affecting Youth Participation in Governance: A Case of Tharaka-Nithi County,
Kenya. Journal of Public Policy and Administration. Vol. 6, No. 2, 2022, pp. 100-104. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220602.16
Received: May 28, 2022; Accepted: June 15, 2022; Published: June 27, 2022
Abstract:
County governance can be improved by catalyzing youth participation at the local levels. This research sought to
gauge the status of governance in the counties. This study was guided by the theory of Positive Youth Development. The study
adopted a case study research design. The study was carried out in Tharaka-Nithi County. The target population of the study was
393,177, the adult population of the county, and the accessible population (N) was 3,698, which was the youth population in the
county that is politically active. From this, a sample of 36 was selected purposively. Among them, 28 were interviewed using
focus group discussions, and 8 participants used key informant interviews to give in-depth information on youth participation in
governance. The focus group discussion guide and interview schedule were the instruments of data collection. The instruments
were given to colleagues for validation. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach with the help
of MAX. Qda software. The findings of this study are of importance to the policy practitioners and county government officials
in their bid of enhancing youth participation in governance.
Keywords:
Governance, Accountability, Policy, Civic Engagement
1. Introduction
Young people in Kenya (the entire population of those
under the age of 35 years) constitute 75.1 percent of the
country’s population. On the other hand, those aged 65 years
and above constitute 3.9% of the entire population in the
country [11]. Despite constituting the majority of the
population, Kenya’s youth have remained at the periphery of
the country’s affairs for decades and their needs and
aspirations have not been accorded due recognition. The youth
have not been adequately engaged in the designing, planning,
and implementation of programmes and policies that affect
them and as result, their knowledge, skill, and energy are
underutilized [6, 16].
Devolution was an important step toward the promotion of
good governance. Unlike the national government, devolved
units, in Kenya’s case, counties are better placed to deliver
social services to the people [15], because the challenges a
county faces are specific to it, and only its local leadership
with its local knowledge is able to address them effectively.
Good governance requires that institutions serve all
stakeholders within a reasonable and acceptable time frame. It
means that institutions and processes produce results that
satisfy the needs and meet the needs of society while using
resources at their disposal at best [22]. Participation is at the
core of governance to ensure the leadership offered is
satisfactory. The governments are thus now under increasing
pressure to demonstrate that their services are citizen-focused
and thus citizens are engaged and own the developments.
Since Kenya adopted the new devolution framework
comprehensive analysis of challenges facing youths regarding
governance especially the dimension of governance on quality
of public service had never been studied in any of the Kenyan
counties. Yet it is important to constantly get citizens’
feedback on public service in order to improve it.
2. Literature Review
United Nations Youth observes that the youth are a
dynamic and creative force that is capable of making
significant change and improvement in governance all over
the world [21]. Despite this, they are rarely involved in any
101 Lumadede Japheth et al.: Challenges Affecting Youth Participation in Governance:
A Case of Tharaka-Nithi County, Kenya
meaningful engagement concerning governance and are often
afflicted with poverty, discrimination, ignorance, and limited
opportunities for employment and business [8]. In most
countries, for instance, the youth are encouraged to engage in
political, social, and economic pursuits while in higher
institutions of learning but are often discouraged from
pursuing these interests once they graduate. As a result, they
do not consider themselves competent enough in a world
beyond learning institutions.
The Kenyan youth continue to face discrimination, neglect,
and exclusion from political, social, and economic
participation. This is despite the fact that they constitute
more than two-thirds of the population of the country. They
have been condemned to poverty, joblessness, and little or no
participation in policy making on matters that could greatly
improve their lives. This section presents literature on some
of the challenges the youth face, which hinder them from
fully participating in leadership at various levels of
government [13].
Firstly, there is lack of adequate civic education intended to
sensitize the youth on their rights, freedoms and roles in
governance. There have been few attempts made to educate
them on the Kenyan constitution, policy making, their roles
and rights during elections, and many other public processes
in which they are required to participate. Lack of civic
education makes majority of these youth to rely on their
leaders, most of whom are older and would not wish to
relinquish power to younger generations, hence being easily
misled or manipulated [20].
A second challenge to youth participation is lack of
empowerment that comes with employment and job security.
The high number of youths is not proportional or
commensurate with the employment opportunities available
or created in both the public and private service. Lack of job
opportunities would mean that the youth are less interested in
participating in their civic duties and more engaged in finding
means of survival in harsh economic times. This would be a
disadvantage to them [18]. Most of the unemployed, despite
having adequate training in colleges and universities, settle for
small businesses and casual jobs which enable them to earn
barely enough for a daily living. Some of the skilled graduates
end up doing jobs they are not qualified for while others resort
to a life of crime to make ends meet [9].
Bialostocka argues that discrimination is also another
challenge the youth face when seeking opportunities for
leadership in Kenya. Job opportunities are more likely to be
awarded to undeserving relatives of the hiring parties without
fair consideration of the applicants. Similarly, in regards to
leadership, positions of governance are usually awarded to
those close to the management without due process [5]. This
means that some of the youth that get leadership opportunities
do not have the attributes of good leaders and therefore cannot
be relied upon to make good decisions on behalf of the rest of
the youth.
A major challenge to youth participation in governance is
the conception of the young people as chaotic, reckless and
without a rational capacity. As such, it is assumed that they
were always need constant monitoring. This mentality is
especially held by elder members of the society who mostly
argue that the youth need to be managed and not be involved
in matters of governance [3]. This assumption is ill-advised
and inconsiderate of the fact that most of the problems that
face the society, whether economic, social or political, mostly
affect the youth and they can validly propose practical
solutions to them.
It is imperative that the youth be given an opportunity to
participate in national and local governance processes if the
vision or goals of the Kenyan society are to be achieved [15].
Sidelining them was only limit the perspectives in which
problems are understood and was limit the possible
interventions for them.
Opportunities for the youth in governance can be
enhanced and made available through various means. Firstly,
there is need to implement available policies on youth
welfare and empowerment. Most of the policies have either
been ignored or given little attention by the concerned
authorities. For instance, the government should ensure that
they provide enough resources and trainers of civic
education to the youth. This has not been achieved to the
desired levels. The youth need to be trained to understand
their rights and freedoms as well as their role in
transformation of the society they live in [17].
According to Smith, Marks, Novelli, Valiente and
Scandurra, empowerment is dependent on the realization that
the youth have a free will and do not necessarily need to align
themselves with the demands and rules laid out by older
generations. Once they achieve autonomy, they can freely
choose the best course of action for their problems and
become agents of change in the Kenya society [19].
There is also need to revise the traditional ways of
educating and training the youth. Instead of training them
how to think and what to learn, they should be trained on
how to learn and the importance of committing themselves to
their decisions. Paradigms of communication should also be
revised so that elderly members of the society learn to treat
the youth like their equals and not as problem to be taken
care of [7].
This research was motivated by the observation that the
youth, who constitute the majority of the population in Kenya,
are rarely engaged in matters such as decision making
processes and governance. It sought to investigate various
challenges that affected the participation of youth in
governance. The significance of this study is that it will
provide information on these challenges, as experienced
among the youth in Tharaka Nithi County, and seek to offer
recommendations which will be applicable to the entire
country.
3. Methodology
The study used a case study research design. In this design,
the researcher conducts both quantitative and qualitative data
collection phases simultaneously, and then analyzes the
results. The study was carried out in Tharaka Nithi County
Journal of Public Policy and Administration 2022; 6(2): 100-104 102
which is a typical representation of other counties in Kenya.
The County has four sub counties: namely, Meru South,
Maara, Tharaka South and Tharaka North. Tharaka Nithi
County has a population of 393,177 (Maara 114,894, Igamba
53,210, Tharaka North 58,345, Tharaka south 75,250). The
accessible population of the study is the 3,698 politically
active youths in the counties. The rationale for selecting
Tharaka Nithi County was that, since it’s the locale where the
researchers reside, it was easier for them to sample the study
population because they are conversant with the area
population and the native languages.
The study adopted purposive and non-proportionate
sampling from the accessible population of 3,698. In each of
the four sub counties thus, 39 respondents were selected. 2 of
the respondents were interviewed using key informant
interviews, 7 were engaged in a focus group discussion and
the other 30 answered the questionnaires.
The study used interview schedules and focus group
discussion guide to collect data. Interview schedule was used
to collect qualitative data from key informants. The researcher
made appointments with 2 key respondents in every sub
county and conducted the interviews at a place of their
convenience. Focus group discussion was conducted with
selected number of youths. The researcher made appointments
with these selected youths and conducted the discussions at an
area that was convenient for them. Discussions were
tape-recorded with the permission of the respondents.
To ensure internal, construct and content validity of the
research instrument, the research instruments were given to
colleagues for expert judgement and thereafter corrections
were made as necessary. This was done by checking the
instrument items against the study objectives. The analysis
was done through thematic content analysis methods.
The entire research process was conducted with due respect
to ethical considerations of research. The researchers obtained
informed consent from the respondents to participate in the
study. The researchers were careful to avoid causing physical
or psychological harm to respondents by asking embarrassing
or irrelevant questions, using threatening language or making
respondents nervous. The researchers also treated the
respondents’ views with respect and utmost confidentiality.
4. Results and Discussions
The findings of the survey revealed that the sample of
citizens for this study consisted of 62% male youths and 38%
females. This means that the majority of male youths tend to
engage more in governance issues compared to their female
counterparts. The average age of youths engaging in
governance was also found to be 26 years. This means that
those who engage in governance are middle-aged youths. In
focus group discussions and key informant interviews, the
participants were asked about challenges that youths face to
access, participate, and be significantly involved in
governance. Most of the participants in the focus group
discussion and key informant interviews held in Igamba,
Maara, Tharaka South, and Tharaka North sub-counties said
that they experience challenges such as Lack of involvement
in development initiatives, Insufficient exposure to
opportunities, Inadequate awareness as well as education,
being looked down upon, lack of representation in the various
leadership opportunities, and corruption. The following
statements are in support:
The government has been working alone and government
initiatives do not truly reflect the priorities of the youth, we
are not engaged in deciding what we want and how we want
it. The government should know that enabling and
incorporating the youth in decisions allows us to evaluate
the projects and bring insights that are so important for
development (Discussant F; Male, Tharaka South).
The views of the respondent above agree with the findings
of other studies [12, 14] which place the youth among parties
that have been marginalized, both in the past and at present, in
important governance processes. Policies are formulated and
implemented without the input of this group, resulting in
ineffectiveness of these policies.
I think inadequate education among some youths limits
their ability to understand governance and what is expected
of them to do. Some of these notices and engagements are
available to youths through forums such as WhatsApp
groups and social media but they are ignored. (Discussant
A; Male, Maara).
In agreement with the above assertion, various studies have
demonstrated that ignorance is one of the greatest challenges
to youth knowledge of good governance and their
participation in ensuring it [1, 2]. Ignorance of their civic
rights and duties, lack of knowledge on how to monitor and
demand for proper governance, and the illusion that they are
marginalized, therefore, discriminated against is a challenge
that needs to be addressed urgently [4, 10].
In my opinion, I think the government whether at the county
level or at the national level should be at the forefront in
planning, organizing, and holding governance training for
the youths rather than just relying on the civil societies and
mass media for the role (Key Informant 2; Female, Tharaka
North).
Engaging the youths in political or leadership positions is
likely to bring the perception that the youths in those
positions will articulate their needs and opinions at the
decision-making table, hence the need to actually foster
more youths in such critical positions. This is however not
the case as there are many youths who are qualified,
brilliant, and can demonstrate exceptional skills but are not
given a chance to do the same. The youths feel marginalized,
and thus exhibit a lack of zeal or passion for governance
issues unless pushed to the wall (Discussant E; Female,
Meru South).
In most cases, however, the youths are looked down upon
such that they cannot access certain information in their
quest to ensure good governance. They end up giving up
and hence become discouraged from engaging in
governance matters (Key Informant 1; Female, Meru
South).
Since many youths think they have been limited to issues
103 Lumadede Japheth et al.: Challenges Affecting Youth Participation in Governance:
A Case of Tharaka-Nithi County, Kenya
pertaining to governance, some tend to self-exclude on the
basis that the discrimination against the youth in terms of
representation in leadership and political positions,
decision making as well as the fact that they are not heard
makes them exclude themselves (Discussant D; Male,
Tharaka North).
In A survey conducted by the UN IANYD in 2012, a
majority of 13000 respondents voicing their plights from over
186 countries highlighted that the main challenges for the
youths were limited opportunities in terms of effective
participation in the decision-making process. With such
limited opportunities and exposure to meaningfully participate
in inclusive decision-making processes, young men and
women feel excluded and marginalized in their societies i.e.,
the personal exclusion that they cannot be heard [23].
5. Conclusions
It is noteworthy to conclude that youths not being involved
in designing, planning, and implementing policies that are
affecting them directly was the most mentioned challenge and
inadequate education was the least mentioned challenge in
Tharaka Nithi County. The youths also lacked opportunities to
participate in governance in the county. It can also be
concluded that a majority of the youths wish to be trained by
the government and be included in political and leadership
opportunities and roles.
6. Policy Recommendations
The policy recommendations from this study include:
i. The youths should be engaged right from the onset in
planning, designing, and implementing policies that
directly affect them as such was make the acquainted
with what is expected and hence participate in
governance matters.
ii. The county and the national government should
endeavor to encourage and foster the participation of the
youths at all levels of governance as that was boost their
confidence and subsequent gaining of experience in
matters of governance.
iii. The youths should be accorded a chance to hold both
leadership and political positions since a good bunch of
the youths are well-educated, brilliant, and academic
luminaries. This was also ensured that they have their
own representatives that can articulate matters on their
behalf at decision-making levels.
7. Limitations and Future Research
The first limitation is that the study was conducted in one
county; therefore the reliability of the results restricts the
extent to which the findings can be generalized across the
Kenyan counties. Future research work especially on how
remote engagement via social media can be achieved will help
improve governance significantly.
References
[1] Amambia, S. C., Bivens, F., Hamisi, M., Lancaster, I., Ogada,
O., Okumu, G. O.,... & Zaid, R. (2018). Participatory Action
Research for Advancing Youth-led Peacebuilding in Kenya.
United States Institute of Peace.
[2] Awiti, A., & Scott, B. (2016). The Kenya youth survey report.
[3] Ayele, S., Khan, S., & Sumberg, J. (2017). Introduction: new
perspectives on Africa’s youth employment challenge.
[4] Benson, P. L., Scales, P. C., Hamilton, S. F., & Sesma Jr, A.
(2007). Positive youth development: Theory, research, and
applications. Handbook of child psychology, 1.
[5] Bialostocka, O. L. G. A. (2019). A culture-sensitive youth
policy for Kenya.
[6] European Youth Forum. (2020). Youth Participation. Retrieved
18 October 2020, from
https://www.youthforum.org/participation
[7] Grasso, M. T., & Bessant, J. (2018). Governing youth politics
in the age of surveillance. Routledge.
[8] Hall, S. (2017). Youth Employment in Kenya: A Literature
Review. Retrieved 18 October 2020, from
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source
=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj9ks6EsMDsA
hUcQEEAHdWVD_YQFjACegQIChAC&url=https%3A%2F
%2Fwww.britishcouncil.co.ke%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%
2Fng_kenya_youth_employment_in_kenya.pdf&usg=AOvVa
w38zF21mcv-Eq2HJ3wW3jKh
[9] Hammett, D. (2018). Engaging citizens, depoliticizing society?
Training citizens as agents for good governance. Geografiska
Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 100 (2), 64-80.
[10] Hope Sr, K. R. (2012). Engaging the youth in Kenya:
empowerment, education, and employment. International
Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 17 (4), 221-236.
[11] Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, (2020). 2019 Kenya
Population And Housing Census Results - Kenya National
Bureau Of Statistics. [online] Kenya National Bureau of
Statistics. Available at: https://www.knbs.or.ke/?p=5621
[Accessed 10 March 2020].
[12] King, E. (2018). What Kenyan youth want and why it matters
for peace. African Studies Review, 61 (1), 134-157.
[13] Mutua, E., Bukachi, S., Bett, B., Estambale, B., & Nyamongo, I.
(2017). Africa’s Youth Employment Challenge: New
Perspectives.
[14] Mutuku, C. M. (2011). Youth perspectives on their
empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Kenya
(Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi.).
[15] Ngigi, S., & Busolo, D. N. (2019). Devolution in Kenya: the
good, the bad and the ugly. Public Policy and Administration
Research, 9 (6), 9-21.
[16] Ogbonnaya, T. V. Role of Youths in National Development in
Ikwo Local Government Council, 2015-2020.
[17] Oosterom, M. (2018). Youth Engagement in the Realm of
Local Governance: Opportunities for Peace?
Journal of Public Policy and Administration 2022; 6(2): 100-104 104
[18] Sambo, W. (2016). Factors affecting youth entrepreneurship
development within Kibera, Kenya: the perspective of
entrepreneurship education. Problems and Perspectives in
Management, 14 (2-2), 2-2.
[19] Smith, A., Marks, C., Novelli, M., Valiente, O., & Scandurra, R.
(2016). The links between equity, governance, education and
peacebuilding in Kenya.
[20] Thuo, J., (2020). Challenges Facing Kenyan Youth | Study In
Kenya. [online] Studyinkenya.co.ke. Available at:
https://studyinkenya.co.ke/blog/challenges-facing-kenyan-you
th [Accessed 10 March 2020].
[21] United Nations Youth. (2020). YOUTH, POLITICAL
PARTICIPATION AND DECISION-MAKING. Retrieved 18
October 2020, from
https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/youth/fact-sheets/y
outh-political-participation.pdf
[22] Wälde, T. W. (2010). International Energy Agency. In
Handbook of Transnational Economic Governance Regimes
(pp. 923-942). Brill Nijhoff.
[23] World Youth Report (2012). Young People Transition to
Adulthood: Progress and Challenges. UN IANYD.
... The reviewed research emphasized the importance of youth participation in regional administration to improve governance in the area (Douglas, 2023). In addition, findings from various studies have urged governments and organizations to prioritize youth participation in social policies and community development programs to empower youth, effectively meet their needs, and enhance their personal growth and development (Japheth et al., 2022;Job, 2022). This shows that strategic social, economic, and political participation in positive youth development can bring about positive change. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
This study was carried out to study the role of youths in national development, using youths in Ikwo Local Government Area, Ebonyi State, Nigeria as a case study. Specifically, the study examined the contributions of youths to national development, investigate the challenges of youths to national development, and examine the strategies for effective mobilization and integration of youths for national development. The study employed the survey descriptive research design. Questionnaire was used for data collection which was raised against a four Likert scale of Strongly Agree(SA), Agree(A), Strongly Disagree(SD) and Disagree(D), and was analysed using Mean and Standard Deviation. The formulated hypotheses were tested with ANOVA. A total of 315 respondents were conveniently selected as sample size comprising of youths in Ikwo LGA of Ebonyi State. Out of the 315 respondents, 259 responses were validated from the survey. The study adopted the Democratic Theory, Role Theory, Maslow's Theory of Needs, and Self-Efficacy Theory. From the responses obtained and analysed, the findings revealed that the youths do significantly contribute to national development at (β = 0.887, R 2 = 0.936, P = .000). The findings also revealed that there are challenges of youths to national development at (β = 0.896, R2 = 0.952, P = .000). On the basis of these findings, it was therefore recommended that the youths should develop interest in politics and contest for offices. By so doing, will help give them youths voice in the policy making of the country.. More so, the government should make effective youth entrepreneurship policies for gainful employment and self-fulfillment. Furthermore, the government should create an enabling environment where youths can participate in political activities in the country.
Article
Full-text available
The adoption of devolved system of government in Kenya was a desire of citizens who wanted access to public services closer to them. The objects of devolution as provided for in Articles 174 and 175 of the Constitution about promotion of democracy and accountability in the exercise of power, fostering national unity by recognizing diversity, enhancing people's self-governance, enabling communities manage their own affairs, protecting and promoting interests and rights of minorities and the marginalized and ensuring equitable sharing of resources. To achieve these, there must be framework put in place and enabling environment provided to all stakeholders involved in implantation of devolution. However, the environment for implementation of devolution has not been smooth due to various challenges experienced for the past five years. Issues like disagreements between the National Government and County government over funding for County functions, poor or absence of consultation on matters that affect County Governments, little technical support for the implementation of functions, insufficient allocations and delayed disbursements of funds to Counties by the National Treasury, lack of capacity and skills to deliver services, corruption, lack public participation, gender inequality are some of the challenges this paper is going to analyze. It is clear that these challenges have affected the implementation of devolution in Kenya. To achieve the goal of devolution there should be a better working relationship between the two levels of government. Parliament, County Governments, the IGRTC, the Ministries, Independent Offices and Commissions, civil society-all should work together in the spirit of Article 6(2) for the good of devolution.
Article
Full-text available
This article frames and introduces the ten other contributions to this collection. First, the dominant narrative around Africa’s youth employment challenge is set out, as are four key points of debate and discussion that are subsequently addressed by the various contributions. We then draw from the ‘research into policy’ literature and note that it says little about how young researchers move into a policy engagement mode, or how they can be helped to move in this direction. This sets the stage for an introduction to the Matasa Fellows Network, which was established to do just this, with a particular focus on the youth employment challenge in Africa. The articles in this IDS Bulletin are authored by the ten members of the first cohort of Matasa Fellows and are briefly introduced in the last section.
Article
Full-text available
All over the world there has been an increased interest in entrepreneurship education and the society in general. Kenya was among the first countries in Africa to introduce aspects of entrepreneurship education in its education and training systems. Entrepreneurship and business creation are a growing alternative for young people in different economies whose age group often faces a labor market with double digit unemployment rates. This study seeks to investigate and report on the factors affecting youth entrepreneurship development with specific reference to entrepreneurship education in Kibera, a district of Kenya. Two objectives are identified, namely (i) to determine the government's provision and access to the entrepreneurship education and training among the Kenyan youth, and (ii) to determine whether there is a relationship between the level of education, training and development of youth entrepreneurship. A sample of three hundred entrepreneurs (aged 18-35) within the Kibera district in Kenya is drawn to participate in this study. Structured survey questionnaires are used to collect primary data from business owners in the Kibera district. Findings revealed a strong positive correlation between the provision of entrepreneurship education and development of youth entrepreneurship and the level of education has a very weak positive correlation to youth entrepreneurship development. This study concludes with recommendations on how youth entrepreneurship can be improved in Kibera and the rest of Kenya. A total of 300 questionnaires were administered via emails with a total response rate of 83.3% (250) returned for analysis.
Article
Full-text available
Youth bulges have become a global phenomenon and Kenya is no exception to this trend. In Kenya, the youth bulge presents a number of challenges for both the youth and the country. Youth represent the most abundant asset Kenya has or will have over the near future. Nonetheless, there have been a considerable number of surveys conducted and reports and studies published that invariably conclude that there are persistent risks and challenges faced by Kenyan youth. The youth are, and will remain, a significant share of Kenya's population for the foreseeable future. Developing and implementing appropriate strategies, policies and programmes to mitigate the risks and challenges they (the youth) face must be much more of a priority for the government than it currently is. Any failure to provide appropriate opportunities for this large segment of the population could have enormous economic, political, cultural, and social consequences. Engaging the youth population fully is therefore no longer a choice but an imperative in the development process. This work advocates for, and analytically discusses, strategies for engaging the youth through empowerment, education, and employment.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter describes positive youth development (PYD) as an emerging arena of applied developmental science. We show how PYD is both rooted in the theoretical traditions of developmental psychology, and fueled by newer emphases on nurturing the potentialities of youth more than addressing their supposed deficits, and on addressing and helping to shape the roles of developmental contexts, especially that of the community, and youth themselves as agents of their own development. We begin with an historical overview and a presentation on major conceptual frameworks, including the framework of developmental assets, which have significantly influenced PYD theory, research, and programs. The following section of the chapter poses seven broad hypotheses that represent the scientific foundation of PYD (e.g., contexts can be intentionally altered to enhance developmental success and changes in the context change the person), and reviews a wide array of studies that lends support to the hypotheses. After demonstrating the general utility of these hypotheses for understanding and promoting positive development in all youth, we review research that illustrates differences in developmental paths and outcomes across youth diversity in gender, age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The chapter ends by suggesting those areas of youth development knowledge where the field is relatively strong (e.g., taxonomies of factors that are correlated with positive outcomes), and those areas where significantly more research is needed (e.g., theories of change that articulate how youth, adults, and community systems move toward greater developmental attentiveness). We conclude by posing a number of theoretical questions, research challenges, and applied needs to be addressed if the promise of PYD as both a scientific and applied field is to be fully realized.
Article
The international aid community presents education and employment programs as the keys to mitigating youth participation in violence. Yet, existing evidence suggests that faith in such programs may be misplaced. This study investigates this disconnect between faith and evidence. It argues that education and employment programs are commonly built on an economically-focused “dominant discourse” that makes presumptions about youth and their interests. Based on qualitative research with youth in Nairobi, Kenya, it further argues that this dominant discourse overlooks self-identity and social connectedness factors that are crucial to youth, as well as the limitations imposed by governance and structural conditions.
Article
Discourses of citizenship are profoundly powerful tools both for defining membership of a national community and for establishing the expected dispositions of citizens. Governments and nongovernmental organisations utilise formal and informal education to promote specific understandings of citizenship. However, efforts to promote citizenship are often marked by tensions and paradoxes in terms of content, delivery and reception of these ideals, not least in negotiating global and national, liberal and neoliberal agendas. This paper explores the rationale for and discourses of citizenship presented through a World Bank-backed on-line, transnational active citizenship training and critically interrogates the explicit and implicit ideologies and understandings of citizenship promoted in the course and certain limitations to these, including the types of ‘active’ citizen proposed and the normalised version of participation and civil society these reflect, and apparent limitations in relation to both state- and citizen disengagement as well as the continued challenge of promoting security through engagement across difference.